Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 17

ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

I. SCHOOL PROFILE/DATA

Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill‐ in only the grade levels that
are applicable to your school. This template aims to organize existing school and community data from
different sources. If you find it useful to lift data from other templates and transfer it here,you may do
so. Otherwise, you can just attach the other data templates to this form.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
School ID: 304824 Name of School: DREESMNHS
Address: Don Ruben, San Jose, Dinagat Islands Barangay: Don Ruben
District: San Jose Municipality: San Jose
Division: Dinagat Islands Region: CARAGA

A. GEOGRAPHY
A.1 Location of the School. Check the appropriate description.

√ Along the highway √ Near the coastline √√ Near a river or waterway

By the hillside On top of a mountain

A.2 Relative Distance of the School

Distance in Km Mode of Transportation


a. From the poblacion 1 Motorcycle
b. From the nearest public elementary school 0.1 Walking
c. From the nearest private elementary school 0.3 Walking
d. From the nearest public secondary school 1.3 Motorcycle
e. From the nearest private secondary school 0.3 Walking
f. From the District Office 1 Motorcycle
g. From the Division Office 16.8 Motorcycle, car

A.3 Incidence of crimes and other human‐induced hazards


A.3.1 Check if there have been incidences of the following in the last 3 years.

Armed conflict as a result of organized crime (terrorism, siege, etc.)


Crime against school head/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual harassment,
etc.)
√ Crime against school property (theft, robbery, arson)
√ Crime against student/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual harassment, etc.)
Crime against teacher/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual harassment, etc.)
√ Fire (Electrical wiring failure, etc.)
√ Health Threat(i.e. Dengue, Malaria, Measles, food poisoning, disease outbreak)

Oil Spill

1
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

Security threat as a result of civilian violence {Structural collapse (as a result of engineering
failures
√` Others. Pls. Specify: __On-line Computer Games addiction, Pornography, Bullying,
Vices: Gambling, Drinking Liquor,smoking and Drugs,
A.3.2 What are the 3 most frequent crimes/human‐induced hazards?

1st most frequent: On-line Computer Games Addiction


2nd most frequent: Crime Against School Property (theft, robbery)
3rd most frequent: Prohibited Drugs
A.4 Incidence of natural hazards
A.4.1 Check if there have been incidences of the following in the last 3 years.

Drought √ Tropical Cyclones (Storm, Typhoon, Tropical Depression, etc.)


√ Earthquake Oil Spill
√ Fire (includes forest fires and fires due to natural disasters Tsunami
√ Flood Volcanic eruption
Landslide Others. Pls. specify:
Storm surge

A.4.2 What are the 3 most frequent natural hazards?

1st most frequent: Flood /Drainage Problem


2nd most frequent: Tropical Cyclones (Storm, Typhoon, Tropical Depression, etc.)
3rd most frequent: Earthquake
A.5 Result of disaster incidents
School used as an evacuation center in the last 3 years
B. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

B.1 Classrooms and seats


B.1.1 Classroom quantity [SRC.15.]
No. of Classroom
Total
For
Level Enrollment, In Good Learner:classro
Repair/Rehabili Total
Current SY Condition om ratio 1
tation
Grade 7 397 1 7 8 50 :1
Grade 8 383 7 7 53:1
Grade 9 360 7 7 48:1
Grade I0 385 7 7 45:1
Total 1,404 1 28 29 48:1
1
Learner:classroom ratio = Total enrollment divided by the total number of classrooms

2
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

B.1.2 Classroom seat quantity [SRC.17.] Indicate the total number of seats in all classrooms.
Number Learner:seat ratio 2
1,580 1:1
2 Learner:seat ratio = Total enrollment divided by the total number of seats

B.2 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) facilities


B.2.1 Water supply/source. Check as appropriate.
√ Local piped water Rainwater catchments Without available Water

well/deep well Natural source

Is the main source of water functional at present?


√ YES NO If NO Pls. cite reasons why: ___________________

B.2.2 Handwashing. Is there space for handwashing?


√ YES NO If YES √ with soap without soap

B.2.3 Functional toilets [SRC.16.] B.2.4 Toilet bowls

Male Female Male Female


Number Ratio 3 Number Ratio 3 Number Ratio 4
Number Ratio 4
38 18:1 38 19:1 38 18:1 38 19:1
3
Learner:toilet ratio = Total enrollment divided by number of toilets: 36:1
4
Learner:toilet bowl ratio = Total enrollment divided by number of toilet bowls: 36:1

B.3 Textbooks. Indicate number of textbooks per grade level and subject [SRC.3.]
Subject:
Subject: Subject: Subject: Subject: Subject: Subject:
MAPEH(Arts &
ENGLISH MATH SCIENCE FILIPINO AP ESP
Level Music)
Num Num Num Num Num Num Num
Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio
ber ber ber ber ber ber ber
Grade 7 0 0 0 225 1:0.6 221 1:0.6 0 0
Grade 8 0 278 1:0.7 213 1:0.7 200 1:0.5 0 483 1:2 218 1:0.6
Grade 9 253 1:0.7 248 1:0.7 314 1:0.9 200 1:0.6 233 1:0.7 481 1:1.4 314 1:0.9
Grade I0 191 1:0.6 298 1:1 190 1:0.6 298 1:1 298 1:1 596 1:2 0
Total 444 1: 0.3 824 1:0.6 717 1:0.5 923 1:0.7 752 1:0.5 1,560 1:1 532 1:0.4

B.4 Library:
No. of books: __420_______
No. of tables: ____4____
No. of chairs: ___26____
Give additional information and qualitative descriptions of the library (on the lighting, space, other
fixtures present, etc.)
Well-lighted, internet connected and very much organized.

3
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

B.5 Other learning facilities/materials (Example: computers, science equipment. Insert new rows if
necessary.)
Facility/Material Number Number Qualitative description/condition
Computer 64 Condition/Functional
Science Equipment Condition/Functional
LCD 2 Condition/Functional
TV 12 Condition/Functional
Printers 6 Condition/Functional

B.6 Availability of electrical supply. What is the school's source of electricity?

√ Grid supply Solar power No source of electricity

Off-grid supply Generator Others. Pls. specify: ____

B.7 Internet connectivity


B.7.1 Are there Internet service providers in the area?
√ YES NO

If YES, check the appropriate Internet service provider/s servicing the


area:
BAYANTEL GLOBE √ SMART WIT Global (Satellite)
DIGITEL PLDT SUN Others. Pls. specify: _______

B.7.2 Does the school subscribe to any of the Internet service provider/s listed above?
√ YES NO
B.7.3 Are there Internet café/shops/WiFi‐enabled stations in the area?
√ YES NO Others. Pls. specify: _____________

C. TEACHERS
C.1 Number of teachers [SRC.14.]
C.1.1 Number of nationally‐funded teachers (current SY)

Male Female TOTAL Learner:teacher ratio 5


15 37 52 27:1
5
Learner:teacher ratio = Total enrollment divided by number of nationally‐funded teachers

C.1.2 Number of locally‐funded teachers and subsidized/volunteer teachers (current SY):


No. of Locally‐funded Teachers: 0
No. of Subsidized/ Volunteer Teachers: 3

4
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

C.2 Quality of teachers


C.2.1 Number of master teachers
Carries Full‐Time Assigned Part‐ Assigned Full‐
Assigned
Class Time to Time to
Position Number Grade
Teaching Load Class Teaching Ancillary Services
Levels
(YES/NO) (YES/NO) (YES/NO)

Master Teacher IV
Master Teacher III
Master Teacher II 1 Grade 8
YES
(Retired)
Master Teacher I 5 Grades
YES
7,8,9,10

C.2.2 Number of teachers meeting the desired competencies based on NCBTS


SY Before Previous Previous SY: Current SY:2015-
SY:2013-14 2014-15 16
Total No. of Teachers 54 48 52
No. of Teachers meeting the 54 48 52
standards
% meeting the standards 100% 100% 100%

C.2.3 Projects/interventions implemented to improve basic competencies of teachers

YES NO If YES, please describe


a. Does the school have mechanisms for sustained √
school‐based training?
b. Does the school use the result of the NCBTSTeacher's √
Strength and Needs Assessment as basis
for planning?
c. Are there other interventions implemented to √ Mid-year & Semestrial Break
improve competencies of teachers? In-Service Training for Techers

C.2.4 If the response to C.2.3.b is YES, list down the top 3 training needs mentioned and indicate the
number of teachers trained on these [SRC.4.]
SY Before Previous SY: Previous SY: 2014-2015 Current SY: 2015-2016
_2013-2014
Training Needs No. of % of No. of % of No. of % of
Teachers teachers Teachers teachers Teachers teachers
Trained trained trained trained trained trained

Top 1: k-12 18 72% 11 100% 11 91.67%


Top 2: Contextualization 25 52.08%
& Localization
Top 3: LAC 47 100%

5
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

C.2.5 If teachers weren't trained based on identified needs (as seen in C.2.4), cite reasons for the
lack of training.
Few teachers weren’t trained on the above identified needs due to the following resons:
first, limited slots of trainees per school; second, newly assigned teachers and the third is, teachers
resistance to attend the training.

D. CHILDREN HEALTH AND SAFETY


D.1 Nutritional status [SRC.2.]
D.1.1 Number of malnourished children for the current SY
Wasted Severely Wasted
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 7 38 25 13 5 4 1
Grade 8 25 16 9 3 2 1
Grade 9 12 10 2 2 2 0
Grade I0 16 10 6 1 1 0
Total 91 61 30 11 9 2
% of the Total 6.48% 4.34% 2.14% 0.78% 0.64% 0.14%

D.1.2 Projects/interventions implemented in the previous SY addressing malnourished children


(insert new rows if necessary)

Project/intervention Number of Children Covered


Implementation of School-Based Feeding Program (SBFP) 102
Supply Multivitamins All Students
Encouraged parents to have a backyard garden All Parents

D.2 Health status [SRC.2.]


D.2.1 Number of children who have other health problems for the current SY. Indicate common
ailments and corresponding number of children per type of ailment based on results of physical and
dental examinations. Insert new columns if necessary.

Types of Ailments (Current SY)


Ailment Ailment Ailment: Ailment Ailment Ailment Ailment Ailment Ailment Ailment
Level : : Toothac : : : : : : : Minor
Cough Fever he Cold Allergie Sore Headac Dizzines Abdomi Injuries
s Eyes he s nal Pain
Grade
28 17 30 25 3 4 68 8 27 12
7
Grade
19 5 15 22 6 2 41 1 15 13
8
Grade
18 3 11 24 4 1 35 1 3 15
9
Grade
9 2 6 20 6 2 28 6 2 6
I0
Total 74 27 62 91 19 9 172 16 47 34

6
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

D.2.2 Projects/interventions implemented in the previous SY addressing needs of children with other
health problems (insert new rows if necessary)

Project/intervention Number of Children Covered


Deworming All students
Referred to the Health Center/Rural Physician

D.3 Children reported as victims of abuse and violence


D.3.1 Number of children who were recorded victims of abuse and violence (physical, verbal, and
sexual). Should be supported by data from the Guidance Office/teachers.

Previous SY: 2014-15 Current SY _2015-16


Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 7 4 2 2 3 1 2
Grade 8 3 1 2 1 1
Grade 9 2 2 1 1
Grade I0 1 1
Total 10 6 4 5 3 2
% of Total 0.73% 0.44% 0.29% 0.35% 0.21% 0.14%

D.3.2 Projects/interventions implemented for children that were victims or suspected victims of
abuse
Number of
YES NO If YES, please describe the mechanisms Children
Covered
Assuring that the students are safe and
a. Does the school have
protected.
mechanisms to
promote safe and
Ensuring high acadenic achievements as All
protective practices
reflected in the CFSS Goals. stuudents
based on DepED's
Policy on Child
Information Dissemenation & Gender
Protection in School?
Awareness
b. Other interventions Implemented Counseling to students who are victims/abused of
implemented for any forms of violence.
children that were Conducted interviews and investigations.
victims or suspected
victims of abuse
(insert new rows if
necessary)

E. STATUS OF PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS OR CI PROJECTS [SRC.18. & SRC.19.]


These projects include those implemented by the school and other stakeholders. Insert new rows if
necessary.
7
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

Targ Status/Accomplishments
Implement Duration
Program/Project Title et Indicate progress of the program/ project, and its
er effect/impact on children's access to quality education.
Start End
GPTA Embarkment/Earthfilli Dec.
ng
GPP Coor June, 100% accomplished: 75% severely wasted
&Teachers GPP
2015 become normal

F. STAKEHOLDER SUPPORT TO EDUCATION [SRC.13.]


Indicate the amount of contributions made by parents/guardians and other stakeholders for
co‐curricular activities, extra‐curricular activities, and other major activities (such as meetings and
assemblies), as well as stakeholder attendance during these activities.

Activity Contributions Attendance


Volunteer Cash In Kind No. of No. invited Attendance
hours attendees rate
Co‐Curricular Activities
Nutrition Month/Oath P 10,000.00 Assorted 675 1404 48.08%
4
Taking Ceremony Food Items
Buwan ng Wika 3 5,000.00 430 1404 30.63%
DIPSA 10,000.00 100
DIPAM 50,000.00 50
CRAM
Extra‐curricular Activities
Brigada Eskwela 1,025,000.00 Assorted 976 1,404 69.52%
8
Items
HSD 4 100,000.00 845 1,404 60.19%
BSP/GSP 20,000.00 20
Other Major Activities
Completion/Recognition 4 10,000.00 1,350 1,404 96%
Meetings/Assemblies 4 1,200 1,404 86%

G. FUND SOURCES [SRC.5.]

Fund Source Amount


General Appropriations Act (School MOOE) P 1,625,000.00/year
General Appropriations Act (Subsidy for Special Programs -
Local Government Unit funds(3 Security Guards) 180,000.00
Canteen funds 5,000.00 monthly
Donations: a. LGU-Province for Earthfilling 150,000.00
b. LGU-Province for Coverd Court for roofing 500,000.00
c. LGU Municipal Level 500,000.00(Yearly)
d. LGU- Barangay for pathway 60,000.00
e. PTA-Income Generating Project (HDCandidates) for 168,780.00
WALKWAY
f. PTA Voluntary Coontribution 500,000.00

8
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

II. SITUATION OF CHILDREN / LEARNERS: ACCESS ‐ IN AND OUT OF SCHOOL

Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill‐in only the age
groups/grade levels that are applicable to your school.
1. CHILDREN NOT IN SCHOOL
1.1 Population of children in the municipality where school is located (current SY)

No. of children NOT in


Total Population % of children NOT in School
Age School
Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total
13 15 12 27
14 26 8 34
15 30 17 47
16 42 43 85
17 4 4 8
GRAND
899 914 1,813 117 84 201 13.01% 9.19% 11.09%
TOTAL

1.2 Reasons for not attending school in the current SY 6


Age No. of No. of children NOT in school according to reasons
schoolaged Distance
Financial Health Child Affected Lack of Disability Other
children of
Matters and Labor by Interest Reasons
not in School
Nutrition Disaster
school from
Home
13 27 7 1 0 2 2 15
14 34 9 1 1 9 1 13
15 47 5 1 3 10 26
16 85 16 5 7 11 44
17 8 0 0 0 6 0 2
GRAND
TOTAL
201 37 8 11 38 3 100
11.09%
% of Total 18.78% 4.06% 5.58% 0% 0% 19.29% 1.52% 50.70%
6
School Project Teams are encouraged to conduct interviews or focus group discussions with
parents/guardians/community members to probe deeper on reasons cited.

1.3 Number of children in the municipality NOT in school the last two SYs, depending on data availability
SY Before Previous SY:2013-2014 Previous SY: 2013-2014 No. of Out‐of‐school Children Attending
Age Other Forms of Learning in Previous SY
Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total
13 NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA
14 NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA
15 NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA
16 NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA
17 NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA
GRAND TOTAL

1.4 Projects/interventions implemented to ensure that out‐of‐school children are reached or


mainstreamed in school

9
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

YES NO If YES, please describe the


mechanism/
intervention used by the
school‐community
a. Does the school‐community have a mechanism to Child Mapping
actively Home Visitations, Dialogue with
seek out children not in school and give them access to parents/guardians
education (e.g., family mapping, Community‐Based
Management System, etc)?
b. Did the school use interventions in the previous SYs to Teachers campaign for
ensure that out‐of‐school children have access to education? enrolment, Campaign for Balik-
Aral/Enrol ALS

2. CHILDREN ENROLLED IN SCHOOL [SRC.1.]


2.1 Enrollment for the last 3 Sys

SY Before Previous SY:


Previous SY: 2014-15 Current SY: 2015-16
Age 2013-14
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 7 434 235 199 170 193 363 382 207 175
Grade 8 354 171 183 390 201 180 390 187 203
Grade 9 305 145 160 313 145 168 351 176 175
Grade I0 262 121 141 291 138 153 299 134 165
GRAND
1355 672 683 1357 663 694 1404 691 713
TOTAL
% of Total 49.59% 50 41% 48.86% 51.14% 49.22% 50.78%

2.2 Number of children with disabilities by type of disability (insert new columns if necessary)
Type of Disability (Current SY)
No. of
Children Disability: Disability: Disability: Disability: Disability: Disability: Disability: Disability:
Level Physically ______ ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ _______
w/
Disabilities Handicap
ped
Grade 7 1 /
Grade 8 1 /
Grade 9 1 /
Grade I0
GRAND TOTAL

% of Total

2.3 Other data


No. of Over‐aged No. of Muslim No. of 4Ps Learner
Level No. of IP Learners
Learners Learners recipients
Grade 7 0 0
Grade 8 0 0
Grade 9 0 0
Grade I0 0 0
TOTAL

10
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

III. SITUATION OF CHILDREN / LEARNERS: ACCESS ‐ ATTENDANCE AND RETENTION

Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill‐in only the grade levels
that are applicable to your school.

3. ATTENDANCE
3.1 Number of children regularly attending classes (at least 90% attendance) for the last three SYs 7

SY Before Previous SY:2013-


Previous SY: 2014-15 Current SY: 2015-16
Level 14
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 7 398 208 190 347 161 186 361 196 165
Grade 8 331 154 175 367 187 180 355 165 190
Grade 9 283 132 151 296 131 165 325 155 170
Grade I0 251 113 138 288 132 156 272 117 155
Total 1263 607 656 1298 611 687 1313 633 680
Percent of
93.21% 95.02% 93.39%
Total

3.2 Percentage of children regularly attending classes (at least 90% attendance) for the last three SYs

SY Before Previous SY:


Previous SY: 2014-15 Current SY: 2015-16
2013-14
Level
Total Male Femal Total Male Femal Total Male
Female
e e
Grade 7 91.70% 88.51% 95.48% 95.33% 93.60% 96.88 % 94.26% 95.61% 92.70%
Grade 8 93.50% 90.06% 95.63% 92.44% 87.79% 97.83% 93.18% 89.67% 96.45%
Grade 9 92.79% 91.03% 94.38% 95.48% 90.34% 100.00% 91.29% 89.08% 85.16%
Grade I0 95.80% 93.39% 97.87% 97.63% 95.65% 99.36% 95.10% 91.41% 98.10%
OVERALL 93.21% 90.33% 96.05% 95.02% 91.47% 98.42% 93.39% 91.61% 95.10%
7
no. of children regularly attending classes divided by the total enrollment x 100.

3.3 In the previous SY, how many children were frequently absent (below 90% attendance) and how
many of them were recipients of the Conditional Cash Transfer Program (Pantawid Pamilya) of DSWD?

Total Number of children who were frequently Number of frequently absent students
Level Enrollment absent that were recipients of Pantawid Pamilya
in Previous SY Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 7 382 22 9 13
Grade 8 390 26 19 7
Grade 9 351 31 19 12
Grade I0 299 14 11 3
GRAND
1404 93 58 35
TOTAL
Percent of
6.62% 4.13% 2.49%
Total

11
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

3.4 What were the reasons why children were frequently absent in the previous SY? Please indicate
number of children who are frequently absent according to reasons.

Total No. of Number of children who are frequently absent according to reasons 8 (Previous SY)
Children who
Financial Health Child Distance of Affected Affected Other
Level were Frequently
Matters and Labor School by by Reasons
Absent in
Previous SY Nutrition from Home Disaster Conflict
Grade 7 22 9 5 3 3 2
Grade 8 26 10 6 3 5 3
Grade 9 31 13 8 4 3 2
Grade I0 14 7 6 1
TOTAL 93 39 19 16 11 8
8
School Project Teams are encouraged to conduct interviews or focus group discussions with
parents/guardians/community members to probe deeper on reasons cited.

3.5 Projects/interventions implemented to address needs of children who are Number of


frequently absent (insert new rows if necessary) Children Covered

School Feeding 102


Home Visitation 65
Dialogue with parents

4. DROPOUT [SRC.7.]
4.1 Number of dropouts for the last three Sys
Level SY Before Previous SY _2013- Previous SY: 2014-15 Current SY: 2015-16
14
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 8 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0
Grade 9 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Grade I0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 0

4.2 Dropout rates for the last three Sys


Level SY Before Previous SY: 2013- Previous SY: 2014-15 Current SY: 2015-16
14
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Fem
ale
Grade 7 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Grade 8 0% 0% 0% 0.8% 0.10% 0.6% 0% 0% 0%
Grade 9 0% 0% 0% 0.3% 0% 0.6% 0% 0% 0%
Grade I0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Overall 0% 0% 0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0% 0% 0%

12
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

4.3 Number of dropouts by cause (insert new columns if necessary)


Level Total No. Number of Dropouts by Cause (Current SY)
of
Dropouts Cause: Cause: Cause: Cause: Cause: Cause: Cause: Cause:
(CurrentSY) Average Lack of Distance ______ ______ ______ ______ ____
Interest to School

Grade 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade I0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% of
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Total

4.4 Projects/interventions implemented for children at risk of dropping out

YE If YES, please describe the


4.4.a Does the school have mechanisms to: NO
S mechanisms used by the school
‐ track attendance and identify children at risk of Home Visitations/Dialogue with
dropping out and failing and design remedies to keep Parents or guardians/Encourage the
them in school? children to go to school everyday.
‐ anticipate and minimize disruptions of classes
especially with respect to emergencies (disaster and
conflict)?
‐ track teachers' attendance and ways of ensuring Checking daily teachers’ attendance
their regular presence based on CSC policy? using Performance Tracking System

4.4.b What are the interventions implemented for children


Number of Children Covered
at risk of dropping out? Insert new rows if necessary.
Home Visitations
Dialogue with Parents/Guardians

IV. SITUATION OF CHILDREN / LEARNERS: QUALITY

Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill‐in only the grade levels
that are applicable to your school.

5. PROMOTION/GRADUATION RATES [SRC.8.]


5.1 Number of promoted learners/graduates by grade level, for the last three Sys

Level SY Before Previous SY: Previous SY: 2014-15 Current SY: 2015-16
2013-14
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 7 398 208 190 347 161 186 361 196 165
Grade 8 331 154 175 367 187 180 355 165 190
Grade 9 283 132 151 296 131 165 325 155 170
Grade I0 251 113 138 288 132 156 272 117 155
Total 1263 607 656 1298 611 687 1313 633 680

13
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

5.2 Promotion/graduation rates for the last three SYs 9


SY Before Previous SY
Previous SY: 2014-15 Current SY: 2015-16
Level 2013-14
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Grade 7 91.70% 88.51% 95.48% 95.33% 93.60% 96.88 % 94.26% 95.61% 92.70%
Grade 8 93.50% 90.06% 95.63% 92.44% 87.79% 97.83% 93.18% 89.67% 96.45%
Grade 9 92.79% 91.03% 94.38% 95.48% 90.34% 100.00% 91.29% 89.08% 85.16%
Grade I0 95.80% 93.39% 97.87% 97.63% 95.65% 99.36% 95.10% 91.41% 98.10%
Overall 93.21% 90.33% 96.05% 95.02% 91.47% 98.42% 93.39% 91.61% 95.10%

9
Promotion rate: no. of promoted learners divided by the total enrollment x 100;Graduation rate:
no. of graduates divided by the total enrollment x 100

6. MEAN PERCENTAGE SCORES (based on National Achievement Tests for Grades 3 and 6) [SRC.9.]

6.1 Mean Percentage Scores of NAT Grade 3 and 6 (or Grade 8 and Grade 10 for the Secondary Level),
per subject for the last three Sys

Level SY Before Previous SY: _2013


English Filipino Math Science Aral Pan
Grade 8
Grade 10 60.63% 43.62% 50.56% 48.01% 48.42%
Level Previous SY: _2014
English Filipino Math Science Aral Pan
Grade 8
Grade 10 67.71% 60.33% 77.07% 68.51% 69.89%
Level Current SY: _2015
English Filipino Math Science Aral Pan
Grade 8
Grade 10 57.89% 68.60% 68% 61.83% 59.94%

6.2 Projects/interventions implemented to improve basic competencies of learners (insert


new rows if necessary)

Remedial Class
Enhancement of Basic Skills in the Learning Competences

14
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

7. LITERACY LEVEL [SRC.10.]

7.1 Number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional, and independent levels on
comprehension for the current SY (ENGLISH) 10

Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level


Level Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Pre-Test Results
Grade 7 327 152 175 32 23 29 10 4 6
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade I0
Level Post-Test Results
Grade 7 274 153 121 70 39 31 21 9 11
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade I0
10
Based on Phil‐IRI pre‐test results

7.1 Number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional, and independent levels on
comprehension for the current SY (FILIPINO) 10

Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level


Level Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Pre-Test Results
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade I0 117 42 75 129 68 61 53 41 12
Level Post-Test Results
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade 10 123 44 79 134 71 63 42 34 8

7.3 Projects/interventions implemented to improve reading skills of children (insert new


rows if necessary)

Remedial Reading Instruction and Comprehension Skills

15
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

8. AWARDS/RECOGNITIONS (TOP 3) [SRC.6.]


List down the awards/recognitions received by the school, the school head, teachers, and students.
Insert new rows if necessary.
Cate
Award‐giving Body (Please identify)
gory
of Y
Awar E Internatio-
District Division Regional National
dees Title A
nal

R
1 2 3 1s 2n 3r 1s 2n 3r 1 2 3 1 2 3
s n r t d d t d d s n r s n r
t d d t d d t d d
S Festival of Talents 2015 4 1 2
T Journalism-English 2015 6 3 1 1
U Journalism-Filipino 2015 3 2 4
D 2015 5 2 2 1 1
Science
E
Mathematics /Statistics 2015 4 5 4 3
N
T National Stat Essay Writing 2015 1 1
S DNR Stat Quiz Show 2015 1
Ffilipino 2015 2 1
Crime Prev. Week Extempo. Speech 2015 1
DPAM 2015 32 21 24
PNG – Mindanao LEG 2015 1 1 2
CRAM 2016 13 6 8
PNG National Champoinship 2016 1 2
TEACH
ERS
Outstanding Teacher 2014 1
Scho Outstanding Principal 2014 1
ol Division Most Outstanding 2015 1
Head Secondary School Principal
S Best Brigada Eskwela 2014 1
C Implementer
H Top 3 Best SBM 2015 1
O Implementer of Dinagat Div
O Overall Champion- First 2015 1
L DIPSAA 2015 Sec. Level
Overall Champion-Filiino 2015 1
Overall Champion-Science 2015 1
Fair
Overall Champion-
2015 1
Journalism (Eng)
Overall Champion-
2015 1
Journalism (Fil)
Overall Champion-Math
2015 1
Festicval
Overall Champion- Festival
2015 1
of Talent
Overall Champion DPAM
2016 1
Secondary Level
TOTAL 4 71 25 36 14 7 10 2 3 3

16
ANNEX 1A School‐Community Data Template

Prepared by the School-Community Planning Team composed of the following:

SPT Member Name Signature

TERESITA P. LOCA, MAEd _________________________


Secondary School Principal II

CHRISTINE BELLA L. PELEGRINO _________________________


SSG President (SY: 2016-2017)

ALEXANDER D. JUMAWAN _________________________


Faculty Club President

FE E. MALINOG _________________________
SBM Coordinator

ANACLITO R. VELEZ __________________________


GPTA President

WILMA L. GELLA __________________________


Bgy. Captain, Don Ruben

JESSIE D. ECLEO __________________________


SGC Chairman

DANILO C. BULABOS __________________________


DAA President

ENRIQUE R. ECLE, JR. __________________________


Disaster Preparedness Committee Chairman

WEDNESMERZON B. SARONA __________________________


School Guidance Counselor

17

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi