Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Division of Cavite
CITY OF TAGAYTAY
An Action Research
September, 2016
BLENDED LEARNING: AN APPROACH TO IMPROVE THE
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH OF THE
GRADE VI STUDENTS IN MENDEZ
CROSSING ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
Abstract
Division of Cavite
CITY OF TAGAYTAY
a. Introduction
learning interest and teaching content in the classroom in the 21st century. The main
crucial commitment for schools must be to foster students’ participation and active
whereby the learner interacts with other students, with the instructor, and with
technology-enhanced literacy teaching can advance pupils’ learning and allow them
process. A blended approach also gives the learner the opportunity to be more
responsible for his or her learning, which creates a learning situation that may be
2
In a blended learning approach, the learner can choose how his learning
before the week’s lesson or after a day the lesson is taught. This is done to give
pupils ample time to learn and master the lesson according to their own pace. Pupils
who are also absent have a chance to study the day’s lesson as they are given
access code in the said application to access the mentioned application. Aside from
the uploaded lectures, pupils can also answer quizzes online which of course gives
no reason of having missed quizzes because of their being absent. Videos, power
point presentations are also uploaded as well as activities. Scores are automatically
saved in the application for the teacher’s recording. In addition, the pupils can also
interact with other classmates and the teacher thru chat or messages. All
and malicious words. Likewise, lessons that are not discussed due to declared
holidays and suspended classes are uploaded for the pupils’ make up classes.
Based on the premise that English is one of the major subjects in the curriculum,
the researcher aims to investigate the effect of using blended learning in improving
Elementary School.
3
The researcher is motivated to conduct this study to find out that blended
This approach was confined only to selected Grade VI pupils, wherein these learners
were grouped as to those who have internet access thru laptop, computer or smart
phones versus those who do not use either computer or smart cellular phones. The
approach lasted for two months and was handled by the researcher herself being
(LMS) because they can access it anywhere there is Wi--‐Fi, students can
communicate with their teachers or as a group, and lessons can be studied at home
if necessary (Cavus, Uzuboylu & Ibrahim, 2006). Using the LMS, teachers can
Skalkidis, & Guerreiro, 2008). This enables students and teachers to build a sense of
complete assignments versus listening to a lecture and taking notes (Zhao, 2007).
be good, productive citizens and empowers them to higher level thinking (Griggs,
2010). Anytime teachers use technology in a manner that is relative to their course
4
Our schools are not ready to provide support for the broader range of literacies
that are multiliteracies (Cummins, et al. 2007). To cope with the current educational
student’s everyday use of web technologies and their participation on web both in
practices may facilitate students’ abilities to think, observe, participate, and apply
efficiency, but also shapes students’ learning and thinking for the diverse community
needs (Lankshear & Knobel, 2003; Cummins, et al. 2007). It can be expected that
school stakeholders can share challenges with others in this integrated learning
environment.
The study is almost similar to the present research that blended learning
pupils.
the Grade VI pupils at Mendez Crossing Elementary School for the school year
The purpose of this action research was to study and to determine the
Learning approach?
2. What is the performance of the Grade VI pupils in the first grading period
2. 1 controlled group
3. 1 controlled group
The main concern of this study was to determine the significant implication of
Elementary. Therefore, the findings of this study cannot be generalized across all
VI. Methodology
a. Sampling
(66 out of 193) of the total population of Grade VI pupils enrolled in Mendez
Crossing Elementary School who were divided in two groups: 33 pupils in the
controlled group and 33 pupils in the experimental group. The experimental group
who has internet access thru their smart phones, laptops or tablets were instructed
both in a traditional classroom setting and an online setting. The controlled group
who has no access in the internet on the other hand were instructed in a traditional
The general average in English for the school year 2015-2016 of the
respondents were collected. During the first quarter of the school year 2016-2017,
group while the controlled group only had the traditional classroom learning setting.
After the pilot testing of the blended learning approach, the first grading results were
collected.
b. Research Instruments
such as the :
1. General average in English for the school year 2015-2016 and the result of
2. Weighted mean - to determine the result of the First Grading period of the
experimental group
7
c. Ethical Issues
inform them on the conduct of the program. Permission was secured from the
parents as well. This program did not affect the delivery of the basic education in
d. Data Analysis
deviation were used to describe the significant implications of blended learning in the
To test the hypothesis and to answer the problems concerning the current status
of the subjects of the study and to describe the nature and situation as it exists at the
with each other and described the present behavior or characteristics of a particular
population.
Learning approach?
Table 1
1 78 80
2 78 81
3 77 78
4 79 77
5 83 80
6 84 84
7 81 84
8 79 77
9 75 79
10 76 78
11 75 78
12 77 78
13 79 77
14 77 77
15 76 79
16 78 79
17 78 77
18 78 76
19 77 76
20 79 79
21 79 78
22 79 78
23 81 78
9
24 77 79
25 78 77
26 77 76
27 77 77
28 77 76
29 77 77
30 79 75
31 81 78
32 77 75
33 79 75
Mean (AVERAGE) 78.24 77.97
SD 2.02 2.13
Percentage Mean (MPS) 78.24 77.97
The MEAN (Average) of the controlled group showed 78.24 while the
experimental group had 77.97. The Standard Deviation (SD) showed that the
controlled group had 2.02 while the experimental group had 2.13. Moreover, the
Percentage Mean (MPS) of the controlled group (78.24) was higher than the result
of the MPS of the experimental group (77.97). The data revealed that the controlled
group had a higher performance than the experimental group before Blended
2. What is the performance of the Grade VI pupils in the first grading period
2. 1 controlled group
Table 2
1 78 83
2 79 83
3 76 80
4 77 81
5 82 82
6 85 84
7 79 85
8 78 80
9 75 80
10 75 79
11 75 80
12 76 81
13 79 82
14 78 78
15 77 79
16 80 82
17 78 81
18 76 76
19 78 78
20 79 80
21 79 79
22 80 80
23 80 80
24 82 80
25 77 77
26 78 78
27 77 77
28 79 78
29 77 78
30 79 77
31 79 80
12
32 79 79
33 79 78
Mean (AVERAGE) 78.33 79.85
SD 2.12 2.12
Percentage Mean (MPS) 78.33 79.85
Percentage Increase 0.09 1.88
The MEAN (Average) of the controlled group showed 78.33 while the
experimental group had 79.85. The Standard Deviation (SD) showed that both the
controlled and the experimental group had 2.12. On the other hand, the Percentage
Mean (MPS) of the controlled group showed 78.33 while the experimental group had
79.85. The data on this table revealed that the experimental group had a higher
performance than the controlled group after Blended Learning was introduced.
3. 1 controlled group
Table 3
Comparison of Grades
SD 2.02 2.13
SD 2.12 2.12
The table showed that there was a Percentage increase in the result of the First
Grading Period in both groups. The controlled group increased 0.09 while the
experimental group raised to a percentage of 1.88. The data revealed that there was
level of the of the pupils after the implementation of Blended Learning approach.
Table 4
Controlled Experimental
Controlled Experimental
No. Of Group Group
Group Group
Pupils (First Grading Result (First Grading Result
(Gen. Av. 2015-2016) (Gen. Av. 2015-2016)
2016-2017) 2016-2017)
1 78 78 80 83
2 78 79 81 83
3 77 76 78 80
4 79 77 77 81
5 83 82 80 82
6 84 85 84 84
7 81 79 84 85
8 79 78 77 80
9 75 75 79 80
10 76 75 78 79
11 75 75 78 80
14
12 77 76 78 81
13 79 79 77 82
14 77 78 77 78
15 76 77 79 79
16 78 80 79 82
17 78 78 77 81
18 78 76 76 76
19 77 78 76 78
20 79 79 79 80
21 79 79 78 79
22 79 80 78 80
23 81 80 78 80
24 77 82 79 80
25 78 77 77 77
26 77 78 76 78
27 77 77 77 77
28 77 79 76 78
29 77 77 77 78
30 79 79 75 77
31 81 79 78 80
32 77 79 75 79
33 79 79 75 78
Expected 20 20
Values
Observed 11 29
Results
ᄃ
15
X2 = (-9)2/20 + (9)2/20
X2 = (81/20) + (81/20)
X2 = 4.05 + 4.05
X2 = 8.100
Based on the result of the general average in English for the school year 2015-
2015 and the result of the first grading period of the pupils under the experimental
group, the use of Blended Learning approach had a significant impact in the
academic performance of the Grade VI pupils in English since they were able to
access the lectures, learn and master the lesson at their own pace.
VI. Summary
Learning approach?
The MEAN (Average) of the controlled group showed 78.24 while the
experimental group had 77.97. The Standard Deviation (SD) showed that the
controlled group had 2.02 while the experimental group had 2.13. Moreover, the
16
Percentage Mean (MPS) of the controlled group (78.24) was higher than the result
of the MPS of the experimental group (77.97). The data revealed that the controlled
group had a higher performance than the experimental group before Blended
2. What is the performance of the Grade VI pupils in the first grading period
2. 1 controlled group
The MEAN (Average) of the controlled group showed 78.33 while the
experimental group had 79.85. The Standard Deviation (SD) showed that both the
controlled and the experimental group had 2.12. On the other hand, the Percentage
Mean (MPS) of the controlled group showed 78.33 while the experimental group had
79.85. The data on this table revealed that the experimental group had a higher
performance than the controlled group after Blended Learning was introduced.
3. 1 controlled group
The table showed that there was a Percentage increase in the result of the First
Grading Period in both groups. The controlled group increased 0.09 while the
experimental group raised to a percentage of 1.88. The data revealed that there was
level of the of the pupils after the implementation of Blended Learning approach.
Based on the result of the general average in English for the school year 2015-
2015 and the result of the first grading period of the pupils under the experimental
group, the use of Blended Learning approach had a significant impact in the
academic performance of the Grade VI pupils in English since they were able to
access the lectures, learn and master the lesson at their own pace.
VII. Conclusion
approach in the performance level of the pupils on the result of the first
grading period.
academic performance of the Grade VI pupils in English since they were able
to access the lectures, learn and master the lesson at their own pace.
VIII. Recommendation
Based on the significant findings of the study, these recommendations are offered:
3. The e-classroom should be utilized in the use of blended learning activity for the
IX. References
http://search.proquest.com.er.lib.k--‐state.edu/docview/61931375?accountid=
11789
Cummins, J., Brown, K., & Sayers, D. (2007). Literacy, technology, and diversity:
E. Massie, "Blended Learning: The Magic is in the Mix," in The ASTD E-Learning
http://search.proquest.com.er.lib.k--‐state.edu/docview/1437133487?accountid
=11789
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Web 2.0 and Classroom
246-259. doi:10.3102/0013189x09336671.
http://search.proquest.com.er.lib.k--‐state.edu/docview/881473459?accountid=
19
11789. (881473459;ED519954).
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and
http://search.proquest.com.er.lib.k--‐state.edu/docview/200076525?accountid=
1ᄃ1789
X. Acknowledgments
My heartfelt thanks to the following persons who helped me put this paper into
reality.
To our Supervisor, Dr. Joel O. Peregrino and all the school heads in the City of
Tagaytay for the utmost support,
To Tagaytay City researchers especially to Maám Jennifer Rojo and Sir Arvin
Marinduque who served as my critics,
To Olivarez College-Tagaytay for giving me the idea on how blended learning is done
and to my my MaEd classmates who in one way or another helped me during the
process, Ms. Fmari Panganiban, Sir Rogelio Nerveza Jr and Sir Anthony Literal,
To my husband, Eldickson, and to my kids, Lady and Lee, for the inspiration,