Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Journal Reading of :
Submitted by:
dr. Tjoeng Steven
S571702001
Supervisor:
Prof. Dr. dr. M.Fanani, SpKJ (K)
dr. IGB. Indro Nugroho, Sp.KJ
i
VALIDATION
SURAKARTA
_________________________________ 2019
Supervisor
Prof. Dr. dr. M.Fanani, SpKJ (K) dr. IGB. Indro Nugroho, Sp.KJ
ii
PAGE OF APPROVAL
Date………..…………… 2019
1. …………………………………… …………………………
2. …………………………………………. ………………
3. …………………………………………. ………………
iii
STRESS, NEUROIMMUNE AND NEUROENDOCRINE RESPONSE
Margarita M. Maramis
Consultant psychiatrist in Biological Psychiatry and Neuroscience Division, lecturer at
Psychiatric Department Dr. Soetomo General Teaching Hospital – Universitas Airlangga,
Surabaya
Abstract
Stress has profound effects on the structure and function of the brain at the cellular and
subcellular levels. The response of the brain to stressors is a complex process involving multiple
interacting system such as neurotransmitter, neuroendocrine, neuroimmune, autonomic nervous
system, apoptotic cascade, intracellular process, etc.
The major areas of the brain most affected by stress are the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and
amygdala, probably because these areas contain abundant glucocorticoid receptors. Additionally,
neurons in these regions are known to be highly plastic, both functionally and structurally, in
response to repetitive activation. Neurons in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and amygdala
are highly sensitive to stressful stimuli, resulting in significant changes in their structure and
function even at the molecular level.
Long has been known that stress response of neuroendocrine system is through HPA axis
(Hypothalamus-pituitary axis). This will lead to release cortisol and its feedback system. In the
neuroimmune system, there is also activation of cytokines, which is in turn influence
neurotransmitter system, neuroendocrine system and autonomic nervous system as well.
Therefore, recovery of stress-induced changes in neural architecture after stress is not a
“reversal” but a form of neuroplasticity adaptation. Intervention such as psychopharmacology
and psychotherapy is given to stimulate this neuroplasticity adaptation.
4
Background
Through life, in self and life threatening condition, human will apply coping mechanism.
The most primitive coping mechanism are fight, or flight, or freeze.
Stress defined as internal condition caused by physical needs towards illness, exercise,
extreme temperature or by social and environment condition, which evaluate as harm,
uncontrollable or beyond the coping. Physical, environment, and social incident that cause stress
called as stressor. Stress happens while people perceive that they cannot resolve the needs and
threats towards their welfare (Lazarus RS, 1966).
Cox (1975) defined stress as involving external stimulus, physical response to the
stimulus and psychological process that may mediate stimulus and response. Psychological
process may include differences between individual and his perception to need for protection and
self‟s ability to encounter.
Based on medical dictionary, stress is physical, mental, and emotional factors, which
cause tense on body or mental. Stress can be from either external (environment, psychological or
social situation) or internal (illness or medical procedure).
External and internal stimulus on human will activate hypothalamus-pituitary axis (HPA
axis). Human is prefer to prolong period of the same system activity enhancement, that may help
coping acutely. Prolong of the enhancement can be caused by anxiety; constant exposure of poor
environment; interpersonal conflict and lifestyle and habit modification related to chronic
stressor illness. Selye emphasized adrenocortical system as notable response in result to stress
stimulus. Increasing of HPA axis activity frequently happens in recent event observation or
change of the system‟s stability.
5
adaptability of previous stage. When long exhaustion stage continues, the animals may die
(Taylor et al., 2012). (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Scheme of three stage of General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) resistance change by
Hans Selye (1946). Resistance towards stressor decreases in shock stage of alarm reaction and
increases during counter shock stage, then reach the peak during resistance stage. Further, in
exhaustion stage, decreases below normal, lastly the animals may die (Taylor et al., 2012).
6
stimulate HPA axis (Raber et al., 1997), so that in a negative glucocorticoid negative feedback
disorder, will increase IL-6 and glucocorticoid level because of the stimulation. It becomes a
vicious circle that leads to inflammation, delivers other proteins modulation.
7
Figure 2. Bidirectional communication between immune system and hypothalamus-pituitary-
adrenal (HPA axis) in human brain. ACTH=adrenocorticotropic hormone; AVP=arginine
vasopressin; CRH=corticotrophin releasing factor; hipp=hippocampus; IFN=interferon;
IL=interleukin; ME=median eminence; PVN=paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus;
TNF=tumor necrosis factor (Silverman et al., 2005).
8
HSP responds to normal state while physical exercise. Stress state triggers defensive
mechanism from cell, which has the role as emergency system to counter stressor, results in
misfolded proteins accumulation (Basson, 2006).
Since 10 years ago, it has been hypothesized that small vesicles, called as exosomes,
actively makes cell to release HSP. Exosomes are secreted by several hematopoietic cell such as
T and B-lymphocytes, dendritic cells, macrophages, and platelets (Lancaster and Febbraio,
2007), also several tumor cell lines, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) (Williams and
Hunter-Lavin, 2007). It is possible that releasing of HSP due to stress related exosome is specific
to this cell type (Lancaster and Febbraio, 2007).
HSP has been classified based on molecular weight in kilo Dalton (kDa) and determined
by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Moreover, it has
divided to 5 families: HSP100, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, and small HSP (sHSP), including αB-
crystalline with molecular weight 12 – 43 kDa (Basson, 2006; Richter-Landsberg, 2007).
Production of HSP is important as the response to heat reaction and other stress. In unstressed
cell, this protein has important function for various protein metabolism aspects (Basson, 2006).
HSP has many roles in physiological process such as cell cycle control, cell proliferation,
cell growth, organization of cell cytoarchitecture, cell death and preservation regulation, cell
aging, directly lead to cell apoptosis and necrosis. HSP role in synthesis, folding, transport, and
translocation of the proteins is as main chaperon molecule in the cell (Basson, 2006; De Los Rios
et al., 2006; Richter-Landsberg, 2007; Haak and Kregel, 2008).
HSP accumulates and help misfolded and aggregated proteins, so that may be more
tolerance towards further stress due to stress state. HSP works along with ubiquitin proteasome
system during protein quality control process. In the neurons and glia, HSP expresses and
responds towards various stressor specifically (Basson, 2006; Richter-Landsberg, 2007), protects
neurons (Guzhova et al., 2001; Yenari, 2002) and has an anti-apoptotic activity (Franklin et al.,
2005).
Mechanism of HSP in responding stress state: (1) various physiological signal, including
hyperthermia, hypoxia, lack of energy, and ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) may activate Heat
Shock transcription Factors (HSF). Activated HSF enters nucleus and binds to Heat Shock
Elements (HSE) in the promotor region of HSP70 gen. Then, HSP70mRNA is transcribed and
leaves the nucleus to the cytosol, where recent HSP70 is synthesized. (2) Due to stress response,
9
HSP70 binds to misfolded protein in the cytoplasm and helps unfolding and refolding to the
original form. HSP70 may also binds to denatured peptide through stress or new peptide chain
results (3) refolding protein into the original form or (4) prevents protein aggregation. (5) HSP70
may binds to denatured protein due to stress or new peptide chain, this complex is transported to
various cell organelle, including mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (Haak and Gregel,
2008). See figure below:
Figure 3. Scheme of cell response to classic stress including HSP72kDa (HSP70) activation and
several intracellular roles (Asea et al., 2000; Asea et al., 2002).
Overexpression of HSP70 in the nerves and glia leads to neuron protection which also
has role in death and preservation cell regulation, related to neurodegenerative disorder and
inflammation of nervous system (Basson, 2006; Richter-Landsberg, 2007). HSP70 maintains
protein intact by preventing protein aggregation, actively triggers unfolding, dissolving
aggregate, pull translocation protein through membrane, and remodeling native protein complex
(Goloubinoff et al., 2007), stabilizing denatured protein, refolding reversible denatured protein
with other chaperon molecules, and facilitating degradation of irreversible denatured protein
(Tomanck et al., 2003; Brown, 2007).
10
Figure 4. Release of HSP70 from cell may interact with wide target cell (Calderwood SK, 2007).
HSP70 is released from cell and interacts with many cell targets. HSP70 may be released
by active secretion mechanism or necrotized cell. Result of extracellular HSP70 (red triangle)
interacts with neuron, monocytes, or macrophages or enters the circulation. HSP70 can be
released simultaneously with antigenic peptide (blue rectangle) and HSP70 peptide complex
taken by antigen presenting cells (APC) such as dendritic cell. The peptide can be transferred to
Major histocompatibility class I molecule (darker blue rectangle) through cross presentation
process. MHC complex class-1 peptide protein is recognized by CD8+ T lymphocytes, causes T-
cell activation. Similar property may be used for other HSP (Calderwood SK, 2007). (Figure 4).
11
through growth hormone and BDNF (Brain derived neurotropic factor) neurotropic disorder. e)
Environment exposure causes activation of NFkB inflammatory signal by increasing pro-
inflammatory sympathetic nervous system, binding of norepinephrine (NE) to α-AR and β-AR
adrenoceptors. f) Stressor inducts withdrawal of motoric inhibitory input of vagal nerve, which is
acetylcholine (Ach). Acetylcholine binds to α7 subunit from nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
(α7nAChR). g) Activation of mitogen activated protein by releasing glucocorticoid as HPA axis
response towards stress (Raison CL, 2007). (Figure 5).
Conclusion
Well living needs the stability of body metabolism, called as hemodynamics. Respond of the
body for any event has effects to a whole body system, such as neurotransmitter system, which
delivers signal for physical activities, mental, and behavior, beside the autonomic nervous
system. Slowly, neuroendocrine and neuroimmune system change through various proteins.
Another substantial system is stress protein HSP70 for cell recovery from damage. There are
12
several system involved such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) system, excess ROS may inhibit
protein function and trigger apoptosis. The other affected systems are intracellular, genetic, and
epigenetic system. They have harm effects and structural alterations, then clinically manifest as
physical and mental disorder. Therefore, recovery of stressor effects may not restore previous
function and structure of the neurons, but tend to trigger neuroplasticity adaptation. Intervention
such as psychopharmacology and psychotherapy is given to stimulate neuroplasticity adaptation.
13
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Asea A, Kraeft SK, Kurt-Jones EA, Stevenson MA, Chen LB, Finberg RW, Koo GC,
Calderwood SK. 2000. HSP70 stimulates cytokine production through a CD140-dependant
oathway, demonstrating its dual role as a chaperone and cytokine. Nat Med 6:435-422
Asea A, Rehli M, Kabingu E, Boch JA, Bare O, Auron PE, Stevenson MA, Calderwood SK.
2002. Novel signal transduction pathway utilized by extracellular HSP70: role of toll-like
receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4. J Biol Chem 277: 15028-15034
BassonR, 2006. Heat Shock Protein 70 and cortisol as biomarker for cadmium, chromium, and
nickel contamination in oreochromis mossambicus. Dissertation in aquatic health.
University of Johannesburg Faculty of Science, pp.22-30.
Brown IA, 2007. Heat shock proteins and prtection of the nervous system. Presented at the
symposium session in „Heat shock proteins and cerebral protection‟ at the World
Conference on Stress held in Budapest in August.
Calderwood SK, Mambula SS, Gray Jr PJ, Theriault JR. 2007. Extracelllular heat shock proteins
in cell signaling. FEBS Letters 581; 3689-3694.
De Los Rios , Ben-Zvi A, Slutsky O, Azem A, Goloubinoff P, 200. Hsp70 chaperones accelerate
protein translocations and the unfolding of stable protein aggregates by entropic pulling.
PNAS, April 18, vol. 103 no.16; 6166-6171.
Frenklin TB, Krueger-Naug AM, Clarke DB, Arrigo AP, Currie RW, 2005. The role of heat
shock proteins Hsp70 and Hsp27 in cellular protection of the central nervous system. Int.J.
Hyperthermia, 21:379-392.
Gadek-Michalska A, Tadeusz J, Rachwalska P, Bujagski J. 2013. Cytokines, prostaglandins and
nitric oxide in the regulation of stress-response systems. Pharmacological Reports,
65(6):1655-62.
Goloubinoff P, De Los Rios P, 2007. The mechanism of Hsp70 chaperones: (entropic) pullingn
the models together. Trends Biochem Sci. 32(8):372-80.
Guidotti G, Calabrese F, Anacker C, Racagni G, Pariante CM, Riva MA. 2013. Glucocorticoid
receptor and FKBP5 expression is altered depressant treatment.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 38, 616-627.
14
Haak J, Kregel KC, 2008. 1962-2007: A cell stress odyssey. In The Biology of extracellular
molecular chaperones, Chadwick DJ, Goode J (eds.). Novartis founcation symposium 291,
vol. 291. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. United Kingdom, pp 3-22.
Lancaster GI, Febbraio MA, 2007. Mechanism of stress-induced celllular HSP72 release. In Heat
Shock Priteins vol. I, Asea AAA, Calderwood SK (eds.), Heat Shock Proteins: Potent
mediators of inflammation and immunity, Asea AAA, deMaio A (eds.). Springer, The
Netherlands, pp.35-36.
Pedersen KS, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V, 2005. Effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding in
Drosophila melanogaster – Hsp70 expression and fitness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology
18: 756 – 762.
Taber J, O‟Shea RD, Bloom FE, Campbell IL. 1997. Modulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-
adrenal function by transgenic expression of interleukin-6 in the CNS of mice. The Journal
of Neuroscience, December 15, 17(24):9473-9480.
Raison CL, Capuron L, Miller AH. 2006. Cytokines sing the blues: inflammation and the
pathogenesis of depression. Trends in Immunology No. 1 January, Vol.27.
Richter-Landsberg C, 2007. Heat Shock Proteins: Expression and functional roles in nerve cells
and glia. In Heat Shock Proteins in neural cells, Richter-Landsberg C (ed.), Neuroscience
Intelligence Unit, Landes Bioscience and Springer Science + Business Media, LLc, New
York, USA, pp 1-12.
Silverman MN, Pearce BD, Biron CA, Miller AH. 2005. Immune Modulation of the
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis during Viral Infection. Viral Immunol.
18(1):41 – 78.
Taylor, Shelley, Sirois, Fuschia. 2012. Health Psychology 2nd Canadian Edition.
Tomanek L, Sanford E, 2003. Heat-shock protein 70 (HSP70) as a biochemical stress indicator:
an experimental field test in two congeneric intertidal gastropods (genus: Tegula). Biol.
Bull. 205; 276-284.
Williams JHH, Hunter-Lavin, 2007. Roles of extracellular heat shock proteins: a new sense of
danger. In Heat Shock Proteins Vol. I, Asea AAA, Calderwood SK (eds.) Heat Shock
Proteins: Potent mediators of inflammation and immunity, Asea AAA, deMaio A (eds.).
Spronger, The Netherlands, pp. 35-50.
Yenari MA, 2002. Heat shock proteins and neuroprotection. Adv, Exp. Med. Biol. 513:281-299.
15
16