Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I.
A wandering word is the word of God. It has for echo the word of a wandering people. No oasis
for it, no shadow, no peace. Only the immense, thirsty desert, only the book of this thirst, the
devastating fire of this fire reducing all books to ashes at the threshold of the obsessive, illegible
Book bequeathed us. -Edmond Jabes.
Slowness has the passion of immobility with which it will someday fuse, in the heart of the
irrevocable refusal to be (because living means acknowledging ones limits) man is like a
prisoner in jail: he is finally conscious of his loss, the victory of his loss.
Dialogue of the living with the leaves, dialogue of the dead with the sand.
The breaking of the tablets is the fundamental act that allowed divine writing to pass from
silence into the ratified silence of all writing.
And passage?- perhaps what has neither end nor beginning, unfixed trace, non-trace of a
burning trace; raw sensibility of sand and skin in their extremity.
Thought must stoop to conquer new heights. Its peaks are also its limits…
The unthought is thought that cannot be made to stoop.
“The thinker is a seasoned fisherman,” he said. “From the sea of the unthought he draws
luminous thoughts-moonfish, globefish, flatfish- which, having swallowed the bait, wriggle for a
moment between the blue of the sky and the blue of the sea before they stiffen, aliens, on the
ground.”
Thought is to life as the unthought to death: one and the same buoy.
(If God is His Word, the desert is older than God, being the place where it first appeared, hence
older than His Word. But God is without past. Do we admit, when we say God is born of god and
dies in God, that He is at the same time Word and place?
By declaring, “I am the Place,” did God want to point out that He was the Word of all places
and the Place of all words?
God’s life was disconcertingly brief; His death, that of His Word blasted.
Of this life the desert bears witness in its silence.
Every grain of sand refers us to this death.)
As soon as creation begins, the power of pent-up infinite possibility becomes vitiated.
(in the decaying word/wound) (the wounding is wounded)
Something similar happens to our idealizations: embodied, they lose substance. The moment
when the fullest experience of the divine would be possible is in that silence truly filled with
potentiality, just before the word is shaped into fact.
Within silence exists a fully developed network of subaudible communication, like the architect’s
blueprint. Andre Neher termed this “energetic silence.”
(living by a train)
Arranging letters to for words before speaking them is one way imagining the divine preparing
for the process of creating. The torah,, according to rabbinic tradition, preceded creation in
exactly the way a blueprint precedes the structure that it details.
The eye captures what it will destroy. It cannot perceieve what escapes death, what is invisible.
“thou shalt not kill,” commands God. Did he hope that man will turn blind again?
God created the world, that is, God created Himself in order to face up to the eyes of man and to
show his power by escaping them.
The best proof of love the creature could give God was to accept his invisibility.
Dross loosened from the mind turns to gold the moment you see your image in the void.
Essence of awareness comes down to this: we yearn for presence yet we pursue sequence.
Full experiences houses perfect embrace, endings always return to the beginning like the best
friendship that happens when you have to start all over, finally free from the familiar.
You could be anyone, a joy to anticipate, a daylong meditation, portentious or at least symbolic
dream, the grammar of a new language, the surprise of mohave yucca that shoots upward over
night into a blossoming tree, the fickle curve of stars.
God burns forever in the four fires of His Name.
He also wrote: “In every word a wall of fire separates me from God, and God, together with me
is this word.”
The Book is what the black of fire carves into the white of fire.
A kind of counter writing carried, however, by writing- its irksome contrary or contrariety, with
which it collides and breaks- attempts to lord it where reflexion overflows the foaming wave. But
there is already the beach, the sand, the progressive erosion of a reproduced tracethat was but
the daring imprint of a question left open. The beach is flooded with the “white blood” of the
sea; the trace, drowned in blood. Obliteration is but the waves of blood on an abandoned wharf
all written, all covered with footprints.
P47