Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Samantha Singletary
Engl102-9SP10
15 March 2010
Tight jeans. Eyeliner. Dark hair. Somber demeanor. This is what I was from 6th until 8th
grade. I was the typical “emo” kid. I was battling issues with my past and these emotions could
best be seen in my dress, in my music, and in my apathetic tone of voice. I grew out of that stage
when I began to find a group that I could fit in to. There are still hints of my “emo” days when I
see my black-and-white checkered pants or Jack Skellington t-shirts, but all-in-all, those days are
over. The friends I had when I was “emo” were just like me, but we never would have dared to
hurt ourselves more than by total accident. Now, there seems to be a trend of a self-harm
stereotype that “emo” carries with its definition. This cannot be solely an “emo” characteristic.
Having experienced “emo,” but not the harm, I can fully agree that self-harm is in fact a false
stereotype, and like most stereotypes, it can be easily disproved when presented with facts. Self-
harm is not a characteristic, self-harm is the result of psychiatric issues that youth today face.
Recent “studies reject that music is a causal factor and suggest that music
false accusations have arisen from the outer society, the media, and the parents of the affected
I am use to hearing the statement that it is easy to judge a book by its cover. The hard part
is once the book is read, that dirty cover might just be a disguise to a story that is one-of-a-kind.
The same goes for judging people by looking at their outward appearance.
Singletary 2
works part-time, lives at home, and thinks emo is for losers, says: ‘They are
middle-class suburban kids with all the opportunities everyone else has but they
take the littlest thing and get all devastated over it in a very melodramatic way.
Every little problem is like a gigantic deal and they are creating these devastating
But what if these “littlest things” were not such easily forgettable issues? In the Sunday
Tasmanian, a paper which hails out of Hobart, an “emo” boy by the name of Che was
interviewed by Angus Hohenboken. Che said, “Most of the reasons some Emos are suicidal is
because they’ve been picked on all their lives or because of past trauma” (Hohenboken par. 7).
No one can see into someone else’s past. It is like stating the simple truth that, “No one knows
me better than myself, and what I decide that I want to share with others about me.” Emo
stereotypes such as the one brought up by Samantha are indicators that an outside view is only a
small glimpse into the whole dynamic person. What these outside views lack though is the
knowledge of the past that these most times misunderstood kids go through. These kids may
have a depression problem or a more serious issue that cannot be resolved due to a lack of outlets
or even a lack of courage to share. These “emo” kids should not be shunned by the outside world
as misfits or losers, but rather they should be welcomed and accepted. By this welcome from the
outer society, there may be a chance to clear up these misguided assumptions and give these kids
The main culprit for many of today’s stereotypes is due to the misinformed media. Our
truth in the constant hustle and bustle of today’s society can be found in the newspaper, on
television, or most commonly, online. But is the news always telling the truth? “Emo glorifies
3
self harm and romanticises death, according to the paper” (Boyd par. 7). This is a headline that is
found throughout mostly United Kingdom and Australian news due to the recent unexplained
suicides of young “emo” teenagers. However, this is not a characteristic of the “emo” subculture
suicide were associated with those that identified with the Goth youth
medieval, techno, and heavy metal is unique to the Goth culture. An “emo”
with relationship break-ups or other tragic events” (Baker 285). A fourteen year
old fan that was protesting The Daily Mail stated this, “‘I’ve read a couple of the Daily Mail
articles and they’ve actually misquoted lyrics and the research was so badly done, it was
unbelievable. I actually thought the story was a hoax when I found it on the internet’” (Boyd par.
10). By taking in accordance the fact that both the song lyrics were misquoted and the research
was bad, then this “true” headline generated by the media is one that does not deserve the time to
to why this “emo” movement is on that supposedly “glorifies self-harm”. Until this is done, what
can be believed to be truth from the media could possibly be nothing more than paper to pen
The parents of these “emo” suicidal teenagers love to play the blame game when it comes
to the suicide of their own child. Hannah Bond, a thirteen year old girl from Kent, was found
dead in her bedroom by her mother in 2007. The parents immediately blamed her involvement in
“emo” music as the killer. But how can music have that profound of a motive, a motive to
ultimately kill? In the article about Hannah Bond, there were many interesting words said by her
Singletary 4
parents. “A few weeks before she died, Hannah’s parents raised concerns with her about cuts on
her wrists. But Hannah told them it was part of an initiation and, Mr. Bond said, ‘she promised
she would never do it again’” (Fletcher par. 6). In this same article her mother talked of how
Hannah was a normal girl. A normal child cuts their wrists and blames the scars on an “initiation
ceremony”? She also stated that her daughter had many friends, but Mrs. Bond must have not
been vigilant of the friends Hannah Bond was around. The most complicated part of a teenage
girl’s development, is the fact that she must identify with a group of friends that share the same
feelings, beliefs, and ideas as with her own self. This causes much stress to the teenager, and
talking to their parents about their inability to fit in is a subject that cannot always be easily
talked about. Upon the discovery of the cuts on Hannah Bond’s wrists, her parents should have
thrown up the red flag. Even if this was an act to identify with a group of youth, there should
have been knowledge that there was more to these cuts. When a child forces a sharp object to
their skin knowingly, the child is either severely mentally impaired or sees that there is an outlet
through this shedding of blood. The families much realize that the most important part of having
a child is being able to listen to them, and the child must not fear the judgment of their parents
because of the true, even though morbid, feelings. Until this is realized, the blame will continue
to be passed around the table, always making the easiest way out with “emo”.
When considering the outer society, one can see that there is a discrepancy between those
who experience “emo” first-hand, and those who simply see the “emo” outer appearance. By
welcoming these kids and allowing them to share what their problems consist of, there may be a
line of communication saving them from possible suicide. When considering the media, one can
see that research done poorly is research that should be taken as erroneous and flawed fallacy.
When considering the parental view, one can see that their fault cannot be put on their own self,
5
but rather thrown to “emo” in an easier method, blame. By taking these false accusations and
correcting the issues, one can see that self-harm is not a stereotype of mainly “emo” children.
This self-harm epidemic is one that reaches further in complexity than a type of attire of a small
percentage of teenage youth. In closing, I will make this final point. “The American
Works Cited
Baker, Felicity, and William Bor. "Can music preference indicate mental health status in young
Boyd, Brian. “Save the children from this dangerous hair-gel cult now.” Irish Times 06 June
Fletcher, Hannah. “Girl, 13, hanged herself after becoming obsessed with ‘emo’.” Times, The
Hohenboken, Angus. “Self-mutilation ‘going too far’.” Sunday Tasmanian (Hobart) (n.d.):