Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Dakota Farmer
Author Note
This paper was prepared for Mrs. Case and Mrs. Diltz
2
Developmentally Appropriate
Introduction
Today, our education system is struggling to deal with the changes in the world. These
changes include children as they come in from multiple different cultures, stages of
development, economic differences, family issues, and technology background. With the
children coming into schools with how they are now, our schools have needed to evolve, and
evolution sometimes has growing pains. These growing pains are topics of discussion that those
with an opinion believe they have the answers. Some of these topics today deal with the change
in careers for tomorrows kids, as the shift in jobs is focused on technology. Other areas of
change include national standards, standardized tests, child development, and school climate.
These topics are relevant to educators, policy-makers, and the students themselves, and a
The topic of technology and how to teach for those careers have been discussed since the
technology was invented. Today, students have technology all around them. The struggle is how
to use this technology and the ever-evolving technology in the classroom. In the age of
computers and the internet, schools have been finding a way to include this preparation in the
classroom. The answer that schools have developed so far is S.T.E.M or S.T.E.A.M. This
acronym stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. STEAM also includes Art, but
not all schools use this version, focusing only on the science and math related topics.
Developmentally appropriate practice should fit perfectly within STEM as these subjects allow
teachers to build their lessons and curriculum around what is necessary for their age, their
interest, their development, and their culture. Dr. Barbara Bowman of the Erikson Institute
The DAP perspective has been frequently misinterpreted. It is not a model but a set of
principles on which to select a curriculum based on some different factors, such as the
age of the child, individual interests, and maturation rates. Unfortunately, and too often,
the principles have been taken as laws to prohibit academic content in preschools.
Therefore, math and science instruction has been left to the whims of children's interests
(p. 7)
She knows it has a place in our education, especially in the younger grades like preschool. These
kids learn with hands-on, constructivist style learning, as they are developing their ideas with
The second big topic includes national standards and standardized tests. Some believe
that our standards should be national to not hurt the children forced to move between states and
are affected by the state standards that differ. On top of this, the standardized tests attempt to
make it where each student is held accountable to have a certain amount of knowledge at each
grade level in certain subject areas, depending on the grade level. Standardized test tries to fit all
students into a one-size-fits-all box and has a negative outlook within the education and parental
viewpoints. They have caused plenty of stress for educators, students, and parents. These
standards are evidence-based and usually taught with evidence-based practices. Kristin Farley
believes that developmentally appropriate practice can work in tandem with evidence-based
practices. In her examples given with her journal article, Farley (2018) describes how “explicit
phonological awareness instruction… is an EBP” but depends on how it is taught. The activity
that is both EBP and DAP is a “shared storybook reading that engage children in rich discussions
regarding print concepts are both EBP and DAP (e.g., Justice, Kaderavek, Fan, Sofka, & Hunt,
4
Developmentally Appropriate
2009; Justice, Logan, Kaderavek, & Dynia, 2015).” In thinking on whether national standards
will affect DAP, the National Association for the Education of Young Children believe Common
Core; a standards push nationally, do not hurt DAP. In their brief, the NAEYC (2015) stated
“Throughout the Common Core documentation (website, standards documents, webinars), the
point is made that the standards address intended child learning outcomes, not teaching practices.
In addition, the writers of the standards specifically say a range of teaching strategies can be
used.” One big teaching tool for early education is play. NAEYC (2015) also mentioned play,
writing “Play is specifically mentioned in the early grades” when it comes to the Common Core
Standards. The NAEYC believes it to the implementation of the national standards within the
classroom, and not the standards themselves, that will affect DAP, as those who do not fully
Child development is a push that education policymakers are starting focus on again, as
teachers are starting to become more like parents in schools. Teachers have to know how well a
student is taken care of when the student is eating, if they are doing their homework, if they are
sleeping enough, the student’s social life, etc. On her website, Amanda Morgan, a former teacher
in the public, private, and migrant schools and current trainer of teachers, explains that
developmentally appropriate education works best because it is meeting the child where they are,
using the Zone of Proximal Development, and raising them as learning. It also recognizes that
environments yields the best results because it is based on what is known through
research and observation and recognized widely in the field of early education as best
teaching practices. It is built from what we know about how kids learn.
5
Developmentally Appropriate
This style of teaching uses psychology theories on child development and applying it to
education.
School climate is also an area where experts and policy-makers are struggling to handle.
Bullying is a big topic due to social media, cyberbullying, suicide rates and school shooting are
influencing how schools are run and how the children feel while learning. If the school can make
the climate feel positive, then all these other issues may see a decrease. The National Center on
will help change school climates towards a more positive one. This idea is due to the positive
relationships built not only with each other but also with the staff in the school. The NCSSLE
(2018) wrote, "Very young children will thrive and become more engaged learners when
provided a safe, stimulating environment, where adults provide and foster positive relationships
between and among adults and children.” Part of DAP is knowing your students emotional and
mental health. This means educators and staff should learn more about their students, diving
deeper into what makes them interested, what their interests are, how they are feeling, what their
relationships are like with other students and adults, and other topics similar to these. DAP is
about teaching the whole child, and if the entire child is addressed accurately and positively, the
With all these issues and more, it is crucial for our teaching styles, and policies affect the
future of the children, which is bigger than any one person. Some ideas take trial and error, but
helping the youth is more important than politics and egos. Developing students appropriately is
the right and honest way, so educators need to focus on their needs to not hurt the future of the
world. In order to understand how to develop students appropriately, the definition of DAP is
needed.
6
Developmentally Appropriate
Definition
Association for the Education of Young Children (2004) writes, “it’s designed to promote young
children's optimal learning and development." DAP involves teachers meeting young children
where they are, both as individuals and as part of a group; and helping each child meet
challenging and achievable learning goals." DAP, to me, is a method of teaching where we do
not treat children as if they all learn the same and respond the same way to one style of teaching.
When it comes to developmentally appropriate education, the National Association for the
Education of Young Children has different aspects in their definition and statement on the topic.
They have three core considerations teachers must take into account as well as twelve principles
of child development
NAEYC (2004) has three core considerations they believe are important to
development and learning.” What this is saying is teachers need to know how children develop at
certain ages, what can affect that development, and how we can approach learning during each
stage of development. Teachers need to watch for signs of different stages of development as
well as influences the child has on their development. The second consideration written is
“knowing what is individually appropriate.” This consideration involves learning about the
students, building relationships, and observing what is important to each student, no matter how
big or small. This consideration includes learning what kind of interests the students have, what
they can do academically and non-academically, and the progress they make. The third
consideration needed is “knowing what is culturally important.” What this consideration means
is getting to know the students’ families. Finding out what their family deems important is
7
Developmentally Appropriate
something teachers need to know, so they understand what kind of values the family instills into
the child. Finding out what is expected of the child by the family, so the teacher holds them
either at the same standard or higher usually. What are also important are the factors found in the
child’s life that shape their home life and those of the lives around them. These factors play a
role and may be out of the teacher’s control, but they will know how to approach and adjust
accordingly.
The National Association for the Education of Young Children (2004) believes there are
twelve principles of child development that are apart of developmentally appropriate education.
The first is that teachers must adhere to all domains of learning in the early childhood education
arena. Development into a fully functioning adult requires developing all areas as these domains
are interrelated. The second principle is that all teachers are documenting the learning and
progress well. This recording is to help future teachers know what was developed and in what
order the child developed it. The teacher must know if a child learned something out of order and
skipped a topic and they need to go over it. A third principle is that development proceeds at a
different rate than learning does among children. Each child has their own pace and their amount
of information that they process in one sitting. Besides that, each child is different in their
temperament, personality, and aptitudes that affects their pace and development. What the family
instills in them as well as their social life affect their learning experience. A fourth principle
deals with naturally changing the child's interaction. During growth, a child may be impacted by
how other children or adults interact with them, causing to either amplify and damper down on
the child’s biological disposition of personality. Teachers need to make sure that they do what
they can to help positively influence the child's temperament. For the fifth principle, teachers
need to understand that early experiences can affect a child in a significant way when it comes to
8
Developmentally Appropriate
development and learning. This development and education is for both cumulative and delayed
and can be positive or negative. Experiences, which are cumulative, help shape who students are
and how they learn. As NAEYC (2014) points out, “Intervention and support are more successful
the earlier a problem is addressed.” It is easier to correct issues earlier than later. If specific
correcting subject area issues before the mistake are settled, the process is more comfortable for
the student to understand rather than when they already have an established misunderstanding.
Moving onto the last half of the principles, the sixth is that DAP must push students
toward more complex issues and topics and be able to regulate themselves when it comes to
responsibilities. Teachers must also force children to think with a more representational
knowledge to be more creative and constructive. In principle seven, relationships that are stable,
positive, and grounded with adults help children thrive, survive, and develop. If children can
come to school with some consistency and caring attitudes from the adults around them, they can
produce some self-regulation and empathy, among other vital areas. Consistency is a crucial item
when building trust and relationships with young children, as well as those that help build each
other up. In principle eight, teachers must try to understand the sociocultural context of the
family and community which with the child lives within. Teachers must know how the parents
support their child as well as how the family may interact with each other, as well as how the
community. The beliefs and the culture of the two groups are important as well. If the
community does not support education and the family does not support it, then it will be a
struggle to convince the child it is essential, and a whole different approach may be needed than
what is usual. Principle nine involves using DAP to develop a sense of curiosity about the world
around them, starting with their world and expanding outward. This strategy would require using
more than one teaching strategy, even if needed on the spot. This is a constructivist perspective
9
Developmentally Appropriate
that uses manipulatives to grasp an understanding for children. In principle ten, children learn
language, cognition, and social competence when they are engaged in play, whether physical,
object, pretend, constructive, and games. It is helpful when it comes to interacting with other
children or even adults. Principle eleven deals with scaffolding and the zone of proximal
development where teachers conduct lessons designed just above the students’ understanding.
This idea, hopefully, pushes students to think with a higher level and achieve new skills.
Scaffolding is a support for the ZPD where teachers provide help at a level to is just right to
bring the student up to the challenge and can be moved higher or lower depending on the
situation. Assessment is needed to know if students met the goals, and the ZPD can be moved up
or moved down if not met. Finally, principle twelve is all about experiences and motivation.
Motivation is a big issue when it comes to learning, as the difficulty in learning depends on the
child’s, and even adult’s, motivation to learn the topic is low. Children will approach learning
with different behaviors, depending on their motivation to learn. The child has to learn
persistence, initiative, and flexibility, with the help of teachers and positive adult remodels, to
push their motivation towards learning difficult and less desirable subjects. Motivation to learn,
With all the principles and considerations to take into account, teachers try to use
multiple learning styles to reach these goals. Each child is different, and they all learn differently,
so teachers may adhere to various learning styles when planning a lesson. When it comes to the
different learning styles, these may depend on the theorist the teacher follows, but they all may
be a vibration of visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and logical, as well as social or seclusion. These
learning styles deal with the senses, the mind, and the emotions of the child. The idea with DAP
and learning styles is that each child learns differently and connects with others differently. If the
10
Developmentally Appropriate
teacher attempts to convey their lesson by hitting as many learning styles as they can, it may
increase the chance that more students understood and retained the idea presented. The benefits
of using multiple learning styles are the same as fishing with a wide net rather than with a single
line. The chances of catching more fish are higher with a wider net.
Review of Literature
There are those in the field of education that either believe in developmentally
appropriate education, are unsure if it is the correct way to teach, or they disagree with the
current definition. Some of multiple decades of experience, while others are still researching.
the practice. Dr. David Elkind is a well-published author since the late 1950s on topics related to
psychology and education, focusing mostly on adolescents and younger children. Dr. Elkind
chose to follow in the steps of renowned psychologist Piaget, deepening his study on the
cognitive theory and how the child's mind develops. He is a past president of the National
Association for the Education of Young Children and a professor at many universities, including
the University of Rochester and Tufts University. During his professorship, he taught Child
In 1989, Dr. David Elkind wrote a journal article titled “Developmentally Appropriate
Practice: Philosophical and Practical Implications” published in the educational journal Phi
Delta Kappa. In his journal article, Dr. Elkind compares developmentally appropriate practice
with the philosophy of education commonly found back then and even today, psychometric
Dr. Elkind (1989) describes psychometric education as treating the learner differently than how
developmental philosophy does. He writes "the learner is seen as having measurable abilities.
11
Developmentally Appropriate
This philosophy assumes that any ability that exists must exist in some amount and must,
therefore, be quantifiable.” This shows psychometric to believe that students need to meet a
measurable goal, treating education more like a numbers game. In contrast, developmental
philosophy is different in that “the learner is viewed as having developing mental abilities. All
individuals… are assumed to be able to attain these abilities, though not necessarily at the same
age." The comparison shown as psychometric believes students need to meet this goal now or
they do not pass, unlike developmental where students need to achieve this goal with the
Dr. Elkind also compared the two different philosophies. He described developmental “is
matching curricula to the level of children's emerging mental abilities." The way to teach is
calls it “engag[ing] the world in a way that creates something new…” For psychometric, the
important task “is matching children with others of equal ability. Bright children are assumed to
be able to learn more in a given time than less bright children.” This idea has been used multiple
times throughout education with grouping classes according to abilities, pulling out all the IEPs
or the gifted kids. This philosophy is “governed by a set of principles” and “a set of skill that are
independent of the content to be learned.” The phrase Elkind uses for this style of learning is
Dr. Elkind believes that we treat knowledge and learning as “a construction, inevitably
reflecting the joint contributions of the subject and the object.” This harkens to Kant and Piaget,
Dr. R. Clarke Fowler is an associate professor at Salem State University in the School of
Education, has written around 10 to 15 research papers. Most, if not all, of those papers, deal
12
Developmentally Appropriate
with education and psychology. In his article, Fowler discusses the issues when it comes to
developmentally appropriate education, and the standards schools have to follow. The issue at
hand is that early childhood education seems to struggle between choosing to support either and
cannot follow both. As Fowler (2016) put it as “…the dilemma that early educators are said to
face between teaching the whole child and the curriculum, between developmentally appropriate
practice (DAP) and standards.” (p. 156) Fowler believes that there is no debate on whether
educators should use Piaget or Vygotsky when it comes to educational philosophy. According to
Fowler (2016), Piaget believes the teacher creates the environment that enables the child to
On the other hand, according to Fowler (2016), Vygotsky believes that the teacher creates
the environment within the child’s understanding to use tools and influences to help elevate
themselves (Clark, 2016, p. 157). Within this article, Fowler sites Feldman and his publication
Beyond Universals as a significant change in the debate. Fowler (2016) explains that due to
Feldman’s research, helps educators understand easier the difference between learning and
development when it came to Piaget and Vygotsky, while also pushing educators towards a more
Vygotsky emphasis.
One of the most significant areas of emphasis for Fowler was the changing of NAEYC’s
position statement on DAP and Epstein’s publication. He explained how the position statement
changed over the years as more research and backlash emerged, putting pressure on NAEYC to
evolve their statement into a better-researched idea. Fowler (2016) discussed that position
inappropriate (DAP or DIP) that heavily stresses child-initiated construction over teacher-
initiated instruction” towards a more “both/and” approach. Later, with Epstein’s publication of
13
Developmentally Appropriate
The Intentional Teacher, it brought the statement away from the both/and approach and more
towards what it is now. Fowler (2016) describes DAP as more of an evidence-based if/then
approach (Clark, 2016, p. 159). This approach is similar to an if-then statement. If this situation
is required, then use this, but if a different situation is needed, then use that.
This new "multi-dimensional approach to development," as Fowler (2016) calls it, has
changed the nature on how educators can approach their decision between Piaget and Vygotsky.
It is no longer DAP versus standards when deciding what to teach. Fowler explains that ECE
August of 2018. She works with undergraduates and graduates, while also researching early
childhood classroom practices. Besides her time as a professor, Dr. Farley has ten years of
experience in the classroom as a preschool teacher. She has a B.S. and M.S. in Early Childhood
Development and Education from The Ohio State University. She went on to gain her Ph.D. in
Reading and Literacy in Early and Middle Childhood from OSU as well.
For Dr. Farley, is in favor of developmentally appropriate practices and has been
researching how to guide practitioners in the early childhood field. There are some that believe
Although EBPs and DAPs are based on research and can positively influence children’s
findings that demonstrate causal connections between a given practice and student
14
Developmentally Appropriate
outcomes, whereas DAPs are grounded in constructivist theory and descriptive research
on child development and learning (NAEYC, 2009a; Odom & Wolery, 2003). (p.2)
Farley (2018) does recognize that DAP is backed up by research that “…positive student
outcomes.” She was trying to explain the difference between evidence-based practice and
“how well it aligns with theoretical research of child development…” Farley not only believes in
DAP but works with EBP and tries to prove that those two can work together, similar to Piaget
and Vygotsky. The example Farley (2018) provides is that explicit phonological awareness
instruction is an EBP, but the way the teaching is carried out may not be DAP. The example that
Farley provides as both EBP and DAP is a shared storybook reading that engages in discussions
In the definition that Farley (2018) provides, she references Dunst and Trivette with a
intervention effective, thus enabling practitioners to adopt these practices to meet the
needs of their local context (ASHA, 2015; CEC, 2014; Dunst, 2009; NAEYC, 2009a).
This allows practitioners to take a more holistic approach and use practices deemed
Farley advocates for a path to evidence-based practice that works with state and federal standards
while also able to use developmentally appropriate methods that use a holistic approach.
15
Developmentally Appropriate
The last positive group of scholars for developmentally appropriate education are Wendy
Mages, Elena Nitecki, and Aki Ohseki from Mercy College. Wendy Mages is an associate
professor at Mercy College in Childhood Education, earning master’s and doctoral from Harvard
in Human Development and Psychology. She also completed a Fulbright Fellowship in Austria
dealing with educational drama and integrating it into teacher-training curricula. She has also
written or been involved with seventeen research papers, most, if not all, dealing with education.
Practices in the Age of Accountability, Mages (2018) describes a situation where a school district
moved teachers into grades and buildings they were not familiar with, moving into PreK-2nd-
grade classrooms when many had almost no experience. The school district collaborated with a
local college to provide professional development to help transition the teachers into their new
positions. The workshop consisted of discussion and modeling in 90-minute sessions in the
morning with afternoon sessions engaging in "hands-on" practice of what they discussed in the
morning. The results showed that the teachers appreciated and hung onto the content they felt
were applicable to their own lives and classroom practices, the fact that the strategies were
modeled, and that the "hands-on" section were slightly more enjoyable. This professional
participants the ability to be active in their learning, collaborate with colleagues in each other's
Mages (2018) shows that developmentally appropriate practice helps engage the learners
that may not always be willing to work with the teacher or learn new processes. Mages is quoted
writing “Although research indicates teachers are not always interested or willing to participate
in PD opportunities (Helterbran & Fennimore, 2004; Mages, 2012a, 2012b), the teachers
16
Developmentally Appropriate
participating in this series of workshops were receptive and actively engaged throughout all
workshop activities.” She believes that developmentally appropriate practice works in multiple
settings.
On the negative side, Kathleen Wallace has issues when it comes to how the education
uses appropriate practice and reading. Kathleen is second-year M.A. student at Kansas State
University. She works in the English department concentrated on children's literature. She also
holds a Bachelor's in Interdisciplinary Studies and an A.S. in Early Childhood Education. All of
her research so far has gone into child's books and child’s rights,
Kathleen Wallace believes that using developmentally appropriate practice with reading in the
younger ages is ruining the children’s choice of books and makes it unfairly lopsided to the
development of the children. Educators are deciding what is appropriate for the children instead
of letting the children find out on their own. They use books that are "easily manipulated," as
Wallace (2018) phrases it, for infants. This is taking the choice away from infants and leaving
everything up to the caregivers. When it comes to preschoolers, Wallace (2018) writes that they
“require books that are clearly organized, `conceptually challenging`(Dwyer & Neuman, 2008, p.
493), and informational.” This pushes certain books onto children depending on their level,
On top of this, she argues that it this leaves the possibility for children are learning skills
or experiencing books in different ways. (Wallace, 2018, p. 25) This situation may even rise with
children in the same family reading differently, experiencing books differently. She does not
believe that outside influences should decide whether books are appropriate for children. From
As a general rule, educators and literary critics, or parents and publishers do not mix
unless a conflict arises, creating an impenetrable binary that hinders rather than helps
children. Therefore, perhaps the discussion should focus less on concrete distinctions
Wallace wants educators to reexamine how they use developmentally appropriate guidelines
The last critical opponent of developmentally appropriate practice is M. Lee Van Horn.
He and colleagues have conducted multiple research journal articles on the topic of DAP and its
effectiveness. Dr. Van Horn has a Ph. D and an M.A. in Developmental Psychology from the
University of Alabama at Birmingham. He also has a B.A. with honors in Psychology from
Dickinson College. Van Horn has been, and may still currently be, a professor of psychology at
Dr. Van Horn took an approach where he used data and interpreted the results of their
experiments in his two journal articles where he researched with colleagues the effectiveness of
developmentally appropriate practice. The first article was a review of data already gathered
from previous works. This review combed through the previous data and found it lacking. The
experiments, according to them, were inadequate or set up incorrectly. They found that some
data were wrong and overestimated what may have been the real results due to inadequacies of
the experiments. Van Horn (2005) also believe that “other aspects of the studies reviewed
18
Developmentally Appropriate
may result in an underestimation of this effect.” This means that some results may show better
The results came back with some positive, some negative, and some neutral. One positive
outcome was that placing DAP in an ecological context, there were little positive signs, but that
they needed to be researched further. On top of that, some findings show that “beneficial for
African-American and low-SES children (Burts et ah, 1992; Hart et al., 1998; Marcon, 1999) are
hopeful, because these children are often at the greatest risk” (Horn, 2005) This shows that there
are signs of positive improvements, but these were the only ones Dr. Horn discovered in his
research. His research also showed that no change was made in the class when it comes to
improvement in performance. When it comes to the negative, there was some research that
showed females might not benefit from DAP. Horn (2005) wrote “Research on gender, however,
is not as encouraging. The suggestion that girls may perform better in DIP classrooms is
unexpected and troubling in light of the popularity of DAP (Marcon, 1993).” This shows that
DAP may not benefit all as it is supposed to, but he mentions that more studies need to be
Everything Horn has researched, for him, leads him to believe that developmentally
appropriate practice, as it is currently presented, is not as helpful is it is found to be. He does not
see any results in research done and his study that shows this style of teaching is crucial. He
would not propose that every teacher should use this style of teaching.
Personal Observations
19
Developmentally Appropriate
There is never a better place to learn how DAP works and when it does not work other
than in the classroom. Witnessing how a teacher conducts their class, their lessons, and
classroom management is how pre-educators learn what they should or would do in their
classrooms.
In my first content-related field experience, I was placed in a math class for the sixth
grade. In this classroom, I would not recognize it as a fully developmentally appropriate practice
classroom. When she taught, it was fully textbook and workbook style for the students, where
they read through the lessons in the textbook and worked out of workbooks. The teacher used an
online version of the book through Pearson. The online version included animations and videos
for the students to watch, but not many interactions with the students and the materials. The
material hit on learning styles that benefit from visual and auditory but missed out on those who
benefit from feeling and manipulating. The parts I would consider DAP was her set up for the
classroom and her treatment of the students. She made accommodations for students that were
low performing and grouped them near either her or with students who can help. She also
bonded with some students that needed the connection, especially one that was ADHD. She
allowed him his learning area and a room to take tests if need be.
My lessons attempted to fill in the missing styles, though this was my first attempts at
creating and teaching lessons. These were far from perfect and usually designed with not as
much time as I would like. I used the Smartboard version of PowerPoint for the majority of my
lessons, speaking and showing. My lessons also brought students up to the board and try out the
math themselves. I would include activities with my lessons, sometimes using candies, which the
students loved. Two of my favorite lessons used candy and a game. One lesson I had the students
in a scavenger hunt with stations. They were in teams and tried to solve the problems at the table
20
Developmentally Appropriate
using their minds, their teammates, and tools. The teacher liked it enough to steal the lesson from
me. The other lesson involved finding the volume of cubes, so we used candies to create our
cubes. The students built up the cubes depending on the size needed. There was one lesson that
went wrong where the presentation file became corrupted, and I lost everything right before I
needed to teach it. This experience taught me always to have a backup. In this field experience, I
The second field experience was a year-long for language arts, and I was placed in a
sixth-grade classroom. Here, I learned a lot about what I would like my class to be similar. He
made personal connections with most of his students, spending time at the beginning to talk and
see how everything was. He let them feel relaxed and calm, taking care of any issues that arose.
For lessons, they were all created by him without any textbook, personalizing for the students.
They would peer-review papers, post on their class blog and respond to each other. What I got
from this experience was the students felt accepted and cared for in his classroom, enjoying their
During this time, my lesson planning started to see great improvements, though it
wouldn't be until the second semester for them to experience the biggest difference. In the
beginning, my lessons were not DAP, as students felt lost and confused, unsure what I was
teaching them and not tailored to their needs. I tried teaching a lesson, my first one, using Harry
Potter themes to relate to students, but the direction I was taking them left them confused. The
scores showed most students did not understand the lesson. By the middle to end of the semester,
I was realizing more of what I needed and had a lesson that worked well. The students were
creating possible hooks for a topic they created. They then worked on it together, writing hooks
21
Developmentally Appropriate
for a topic someone else created by going around the room and writing on other students’ topics.
They then used the hooks written on their topic to create an introduction. This lesson went well
with the students, as it seemed they learned a lot though they seemed confused a little on the
directions. The next semester I taught one of my favorite lessons for this field experience. I was
teaching them about bias and used four articles on the same topic but two news sites that leaned
liberal and two that leaned Republican, with the topic about school safety. The students were
very engaged, though I controlled the discussion away from politics, as this was not the point.
From their interactions and discussion, I could tell they all left learning a little more than they did
walking in. My Language arts field experience was, by far, the best field experience I've
experienced so far.
Currently I am in both a science and social studies field experience. My science field
In science, he attempts to be DAP by having the students conduct experiments, draw, create, and
observe and note their observations. He always has stacks of worksheets and papers they use,
even when it is part of the experiments. I do not notice what does to make accommodations for
those who need support besides when they take tests. He has plenty of videos for them to watch
and visual when it helps. In social studies, she uses a textbook and uses a scholastic newspaper
that delves into the history of Ohio, broken up by topics. She also has used manipulatives and
games to help the students, while also making accommodations for students. Both classrooms
deal with behavior problems, more in the social studies than I notice in the science room.
I have only taught one lesson for each of the two field experiences this semester, and I
would classify them as DAP. My science lesson used discussion, as ecosystems and invasive
species was the topic, while also combining research and critical thinking. I had them create an
22
Developmentally Appropriate
ecosystem with Play-Doh to visualize and build to help drive home the lesson. For social studies,
I used pictures and a game at the beginning to help the students review and relax. Then I used a
primary source picture and drawing to teach about learning history with primary sources. In the
end, there was an interactive website with a map that showed different historical events.
These experiences taught me a lot of what I would or would not do. I do not want to teach
to a textbook, though it would be helpful to fall back on if need be. I want my students to feel
they can connect and see me as a person, coming to me when they need help. I want to teach in a
In my experience, I have noticed that one field experience where students were the most
set up to succeed was in the classroom with the most developmentally appropriate practices. That
classroom followed a similar description of what Dr. Elkind had for developmental. He believed
you taught it through creative activities and engaging the world. That classroom, and those that
tried to use DAP to an extent, had the students participate with the world around them and in the
classroom. As what Dr. Fowler described, teachers should use some of Vygotsky when it comes
to the ZPD like Feldman, whom he cited, pushed towards in his paper.
The outcome of a DAP classroom is one where the students can critically think about
issues and topics of this world. They feel connected to the lessons and could give some insight
on what can be improved on with lessons. The students should leave a classroom having learned
something new or expanded on the knowledge they already had. Lessons should include some or
all the following: hands-on, visual, interactive, and involve the students working together at
some point. A DAP classroom should never be just lecturing in front of students while they take
23
Developmentally Appropriate
notes. The students should also be involved with the lesson at some point, feeling like the
citizens, having learned how to interact with each other, other adults, and society. These results
sound optimistic, but more research into this is needed, as Dr. Horn points out. Not all studies
show that this is the case. His research ended with some positive results, some neutral results,
Dr. Horns studies and research shows that females would thrive more in a
developmentally inappropriate practice styled classroom. Though this would need more data and
analysis, this is a sign that some students may succeed in a school not taught with
developmentally appropriate practices. I would say that not all students will fail in a setup with
These students were learning and could pass tests just fine. There was even a fifth-grade student
in her sixth-grade class that was passing everything. She was also working towards a way for
him to be involved in her honors class that covered seventh-grade material. Students can
succeed, as I have been in classrooms during my K-12 career that was not DAP. I just noticed
I have been in classrooms where they do not use DAP, and those students can be
successful to an extent. They are able to comprehend what is being taught, but what I noticed is
more regurgitation and not application of the content. The students used workbooks and lecture
style teaching, practicing as the teacher went through the lesson on the board. This shows that the
classroom at least had the students practice what was being taught that moment and not only later
for homework where there may be little support given if support is needed. I believe students can
24
Developmentally Appropriate
be successful in that classroom if that is how they best learn. There are students who prefer
lecture and notes when it comes to teaching. The outcomes of those who experience a
developmentally inappropriate classroom may feel that the teacher is there to provide learning
their way and the students need to conform to the teacher’s way. I know I experienced this,
learning what to expect from different teachers when it came to how they conducted their
classroom and their style of teaching. They presented it how they knew and not what was best for
the students. As far as I remember, throughout my K-12 education, teachers did not ask the
students if there were ways they learned best and then change their teaching to help. Students
The students who are in DAP classrooms seem to be set up for more success than
students who are not in those styled rooms. They are learning more than just the subject material
but also had to interact with each other and help each other. The teachers are meeting more of
their needs than only their curricular requirements. The students are feeling cared for and
listened to. Students who experience a DIP classroom may not learn less but may not feel like
what they learn is not relevant to their life, even if it is the same content. Dr. Horn presented data
that showed females may learn better in a DIP setting, but they may see the connections to their
content easier or it may fit their emotional needs better than a DAP setting. This shows that DIP
classrooms are not harmful towards all students, but educators need to expand their methods to
References
National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments. (2018). Developmentally
Environments: https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/training-technical-
assistance/education-level/early-learning/developmentally-appropriate-practice
Bowman, B. T. (1998). Math, Science and Technology in Early Childhood Education. Forum on
Epstein, A. (2007). The intentional Teacher. Washington D.C.: National Association for the
Farley, K. S., Brock, M. E., & Winterbottom, C. (2018). Evidence-Based Practices: Providing
Fowler, R. C. (2016). Reframing the Debate About the Relationship Between Learning. early
Horn, M. L., Karlin, E. O., Ramey, S. L., Aldridge, J., & Synder, S. W. (2005). Effects of
Reserach and Discussion of Methodological and Analytic Issues. The Elementary School
Journal, 325-351.
Mages, W. K., Nitecki, E., & Ohseki, A. (2018). A College-Community Collaboration: Fostering
Morgan, A. (2010, November 15). DAP: What Does it Mean to Use Developmentally
Appropriate Practice? Retrieved from Not Just Cute with Amanda Morgan:
26
Developmentally Appropriate
https://notjustcute.com/2010/11/15/dap-what-does-it-mean-to-use-developmentally-
appropriate-practice/
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2004). Developmentally Appropriate
Practice. Retrieved from National Association for the Education of Young Children:
https://www.naeyc.org/resources/topics/developmentally-appropriate-practice
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2015, April). Developmentally
Appropriate Practice and the Common Core State Standards: Framing the Issues .
https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-
shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/topics/15_developmentally_appropriate_practice_and
_the_common_core_state_standards.pdf