Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
RC 1000
Expository Writing
“Writing is really a way of thinking--not just feeling but thinking about things that are disparate,
unresolved, mysterious, problematic or just sweet.”
― Toni Morrison
Required Resources
Diana Hacker and Nancy Sommers, A Writer’s Reference (customized for ASU)
Holly Bauer, Food Matters
Assignment One
Rhetorical Analysis (15% of Course Grade)
The Rhetorical analysis examines a visual artifact to determine what
persuasive elements are employed, to raise methodological concerns, and to
expose biases that might affect its value or use.
Assignment Two
Research Proposal & Annotated Bibliography of 5 sources (15% of Course
Grade)
You will propose your research idea, including thesis, methodology, and
resources. In preparation for the research project, you will gather and annotate
sources emphasizing their value for a particular research project.
Assignment Three
Research-Based Argument (25% of Course Grade)
You will compose a research paper or multimodal project that extends out of
your annotated bibliography.
Scholar’s Circle (15% of Course Grade)
At the end of each major assignment, students will present their research
focus, interests, concerns, findings, outcomes, and compositions. These
presentations will be multi-modal, thorough, rigorous, academic explanations
of each student’s process during the assignment. This is meant to create a
scholarly circle in which you reflect on what you learned about your own
process as a writer. Use these reflections to evaluate your synthesis of the
content and your responses to both course readings and your related major
assignment. Consider the following questions: What did you learn about your
2
process as a writer? What do you like best about your paper/project? What
was the hardest aspect of composing this paper/project? How did you
approach revising your draft? What did you take into account? How did you
use the handbook to improve your writing? What aspects of your composing
would you like to continue to work on? There will be no make-up days for
these presentations, which account individually for 5% (15% cumulatively) of
your course grade.
Reflective Portfolio (30% of Course Grade)
As the culmination of the course, you will submit a portfolio consisting of a
reflective portfolio letter, your revised research project, and one additional
revised major assignment of your choice. Additionally, you will submit
evidence of your reflective reading and writing process. All final projects
must be fully revised and polished.
Community Expectations
(See below for class policies & procedures)
Peer Review: Everything you write in this course is subject to peer review. You will
occasionally be asked to share your work with your classmates and to comment on the
work of others.
Collaboration & The University Writing Center: You are strongly encouraged to share
your thoughts and responses to the course materials with your classmates, both inside and
outside the classroom. Helping one another to gain greater comprehension of the readings,
discussing your ideas with your fellow students, reading your classmates’ paper drafts, and
offering suggestions for improvement are all acceptable forms of collaboration. Effective
collaboration requires that you respond respectfully to your classmates and instructor at all
times. Beyond the collaborative spirit of this course, the University’s Writing Center
(UWC) is a wonderful resource in support of the writing process. Located in room 204 of
the Belk Library & Information Commons, the UWC is here to help you with any writing
assignment. Consultants will work with you one-on-one and provide assistance with style,
organization, content, voice, documentation, and grammar. In addition to your draft and/or
any pre-writing notes, bring your assignment to your UWC session. To make an
appointment, go to https://appstate.mywconline.com/ to register and access the scheduling
system. Current Writing Center hours, updates, and handouts can all be found on the
UWC’s website.
3
Reading Accountability: When assigned reading is due, come prepared to discuss the
following: What questions, issues, and/or problems do the authors identify or respond to?
What rhetorical moves and stylistic choices do you see working well in each writing. In
what ways do the authors “speak” to each other? How might you respond? What questions
of your own do you have? All in-class writings and reading responses will be counted in
the final portfolio.
A Writer’s Reference: D ifferent students manage the writing and reading processes in
different ways. Handbooks can help you manage your own individual process. You should
familiarize yourself with what A Writer’s Reference has to offer, paying attention to how
this text is useful to the class conversation about the writing process. We will use the
handbook in class to talk about inquiry, the writing process, peer work, and revision.
Sometimes I will point you to a specific section that may help you with your individual
work. If you find yourself facing a particular challenge, talk with me about how the
handbook might be useful to you.
Course Flow
(This schedule is subject to change to accommodate a shift in deadlines.)
Final Exam:
May 3 11:00AM-1:30PM
Electronically Submit Portfolios (due not later than the end of the
exam period)
8
● This course is designed to help you improve your writing by emphasizing extensive
planning and careful attention to the process of writing.
● In order to become comfortable with this process, each major writing assignment
will require multiple drafts, at least one of which will be reviewed by one of your
peers.
● In-class peer reviews cannot be made up.
● Your absence during a writer’s workshop impacts the ability of your fellow students
to learn from you. Missing a peer review results in a one-half letter grade deduction
off of the portfolio in which that assignment is submitted.
Reflective Portfolios
● Late portfolios will receive a zero.
● In all sections of RC 1000, students are required to compile a digital portfolio. This
enables you to collect, document, contextualize, and reflect on your
writing and your growth as a writer over the course of the semester.
● This portfolio should be media-rich and should provide an authentic, holistic
representation of your scholarly accomplishments, academic skills, and experiential
learning as a result of this course.
9
● When working in Google docs or Google Drive, you will want to make sure you
save drafts and iterations along the way. Demonstration of your process is crucial to
the final portfolio, so you will want to make sure you have saved drafts in order to
demonstrate your changes and growth as a composer.
Academic Integrity
As expressed in ASU’s student code of conduct, plagiarism is the passing off of another
person’s work as if it were one’s own, by claiming credit for something that was actually
done by someone else. An unacknowledged use of words, ideas, information, research, or
findings not your own, taken from any source is plagiarism. Academic dishonesty can be
as basic as someone else writing your paper for you, and it extends to the practice of
turning in work that has been edited for grammar by someone other than yourself (the
University Writing Center will know how to assist you and your work without treading on
dishonest ground). At a minimum, plagiarism will result in a 0 for the assignment and
quite possibly an F for this class.
Accomodations
Appalachian State University is committed to making reasonable accommodations for
individuals with documented qualifying disabilities in accordance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Those seeking
accommodations based on a substantially limiting disability must contact and register with
The Office of Disability Services (ODS) at http://www.ods.appstate.edu or 828-262-3056.
Once registration is complete, individuals will meet with ODS staff to discuss eligibility
and appropriate accommodations.
10
● Generates ideas and drafts, revises, edits, and proofreads recursively, consciously,
and effectively.
● Participates actively and collaboratively in a writing community.
● Reflects upon semester writing, in part by evaluating own work and that of writing
community members.
Goal 4: Student gains increasing ability to research and write in various environments,
including Electronic Environments.
● Use a variety of technologies to produce and share writing.
● Use a variety of technologies in conducting research.
All RC 1000 students will produce a semester-ending digital portfolio that demonstrates
fulfillment of these goals and outcomes.
Major Assignments
The major goal of this 3-4 page essay is to explore analytically the language and images of
an advertisement, website page, YouTube video, etc. in order to understand the rhetorical
situation, including context; the intended target audience and outcome; how the text ‘goes
to work’ on its intended audience in order to achieve its intended outcome, including
ethos, pathos, logos, visual appeals, cultural symbolism, etc.; and any underlying premises,
logical fallacies, metanarratives, etc. Your job, then, is to identify a web-based text related
to the theme of this course and write a rhetorical analysis of the ways in which the text
tries to persuade or reach a particular targeted audience (and whether you think the text is
effective, subversive, misleading, etc.). You will want to consider the exigencies (a term
we will continue to discuss in class) that surround you chosen ad, website, or YouTube
video; the written, spoken, and visual rhetoric of the text; the implied vs. stated audience;
the success of the text; etc. To write your essay, follow these guidelines:
● Included in your introductory paragraph should be the name, summary, and
citation information of your ad, website, or YouTube video.
● The introductory paragraph(s) must introduce your reader to your text and the text’s
intended audience.
● Throughout the body of your essay, you will need to provide multiple examples
11
to support your rhetorical analysis--unpacking logical fallacies and rhetorical
appeals.
● Use your conclusion to remind your readers of your broader analysis.
● You must include properly formatted in-text citations and a Works Cited page that
reference the ad, website, or YouTube video (your primary text) itself.
● The paper should be 3-4 pgs. in length, use MLA formatting, and include
parenthetical citations at the end of quotes or paraphrases.
The Annotated Bibliography: An annotated bibliography goes behind (or below) the
proposal and provides specific information about each source you will use. As a
12
researcher, you have become an expert on your topic: you have the ability to explain the
content of your sources, asses their usefulness, and share this information with others who
may be less familiar with them. The annotated bibliography serves as a curated list of
annotations that support your research.
Below you will find sample annotations from annotated bibliographies, each with a different research project. Remember that
the annotations you include in your own bibliography should reflect your research project and/or the guidelines of your
assignment. As mentioned elsewhere in this resource, depending on the purpose of your bibliography, some annotations may
summarize, some may assess or evaluate a source, and some may reflect on the source’s possible uses for the project at hand.
Some annotations may address all three of these steps. Consider the purpose of your annotated bibliography and/or your
13
instructor’s directions when deciding how much information to include in your annotations. Please keep in mind that all your
text, including the write-up beneath the citation, must be indented so that the author's last name is the only text that is flush left.
Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life. Anchor Books, 1995.
Lamott's book offers honest advice on the nature of a writing life, complete with its insecurities and failures. Taking a
humorous approach to the realities of being a writer, the chapters in Lamott's book are wry and anecdotal and offer
advice on everything from plot development to jealousy, from perfectionism to struggling with one's own internal
critic.
In the process, Lamott includes writing exercises designed to be both productive and fun. Lamott offers sane advice
for those struggling with the anxieties of writing, but her main project seems to be offering the reader a reality check
regarding writing, publishing, and struggling with one's own imperfect humanity in the process. Rather than a
practical handbook to producing and/or publishing, this text is indispensable because of its honest perspective, its
Chapters in this text could easily be included in the curriculum for a writing class. Several of the chapters in Part 1
address the writing process and would serve to generate discussion on students' own drafting and revising processes.
Some of the writing exercises would also be appropriate for generating classroom writing exercises. Students should
In the sample annotation above, the writer includes three paragraphs: a summary, an evaluation of the text, and a reflection on
its applicability to his/her own research, respectively.
Leaning on assignment two (the research proposal and annotated bibliography), compose a
six-page essay or digital equivalent in response to one of the prompts below. Choose the
medium that best fits your argument, and incorporate all of your sources from your
annotated bibliography. This assignment should adhere to MLA formatting and citation
conventions.
14
Option #1: What is food? What is the purpose of food? What determines what we
eat?
The authors in this section of our textbook offer varying definitions of food,
describe its multiple purposes and argue for various understandings of the larger political,
cultural, and socio-economic factors that play a role in determining what we eat. Select at
least four authors that address a related issue or question. You may draw from ideas in the
course reader’s question sections or develop your own. Either way, consider how they
collectively respond to that question and how their ideas are “speaking” to one another.
What is driving their “conversation”? How do they each contribute to our understanding of
the definition and purpose of food? What do they say about what determines what we eat?
Why are you compelled to focus on this particular issue or problem? What ideas do you
have to share?
Articulate the issue or question that you want to focus on in your project, one about
which you have something to contribute. After you articulate your question, make a claim
in response to it. Then, write an argument that supports your main claim, using evidence
from at least five course readings.
Deadline: Due in rough-draft form at various stages and submitted electronically by the
end of our final exam period. Any portfolio that is updated or submitted after our final
exam period (i.e., after the due date) will not be accepted and will receive a zero for the
grade. Please note that a final reflective portfolio is required for completion of RC 1000.
Please see the syllabus for deadlines.
Instructions: Your final digital portfolio should be collected using any online platform
you choose (e.g., Weebly, Wix, Google sites, Adobe, Spark, Digication, etc.). Failure to
follow these instructions will affect your grade, and failure to complete a final digital
portfolio will result in an F for the course. I will NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE
accept late portfolios. Your portfolio should include ALL of the following:
16
2. Digital Affordances: Throughout the digital portfolio, you will need to take
advantage of multimodality. This means that wherever it adds strength to your
essays and serves a purpose, you will need to embed images, video, sound,
hyperlinks, etc. and play with color, font, and style. In other words, this course has
focused on a sense of rhetorical awareness and persuasion. This digital portfolio
asks you to take the work you have done and move that work into an online
space—speaking to a public audience that is invested in the theme of our class.
Doing so requires more than simply uploading your alphabetic essays; it requires an
employment of all modes of appeal and digital affordances. Remember to use digital
content that is appropriate and cite accordingly. Make sure to keep your audience in
mind and not overburden the reader with excessive hyperlinks. Be sure to respond
thoughtfully to images and videos that you do include. In other words, if you find an
image or video worthy of inclusion in your website, be sure to tell your audience
why. Each page within the portfolio/website should include at least 2 images or
videos, and you should consider incorporating more than that as long as each
element strengthens the claims you are making with your text. In other words, make
sure all of your visual choices serve the purpose of strengthening your argument and
appealing to your audience. Check out this link to ASU’s Documentary Film
Services, which offers links to free and open-sourced images and sounds:
https://doc.appstate.edu/resources/free-photos-music
17
research and writing processes. Reflection is a vital part of your portfolio and
should be treated as such. This piece of writing should fully embrace your
unique voice and style, but it is meant to be a polished text by the time you
submit your portfolio. The tone should be academic and professional. I
encourage you to seek feedback before its submission through the Writing
Center.
● How have your essays helped you meet the learning outcomes for this
course?
● How has your writing process developed and/or changed? How did the
multiple drafts affect your writing? Will you continue to embrace
writing as a process? Why or why not?
● How does this portfolio ‘go to work’ on its public audience in terms of
introducing readers to your work, complicating the
knowledge/assumptions that readers may bring to your work, and
proposing solutions or inviting readers to engage in making new
meaning through reading your portfolio?
● How does this portfolio contribute to the cultural dialogue and public
debates discussed in the content of your portfolio?
➔ Process Tab: (this is more for my eyes than a public audience). This category
should include any in-class writings, peer reviews, and one revised major
assignment of your choosing (i.e., either the rhetorical analysis or annotated
18
bib/proposal). Included in this tab should be all artifacts/pieces of evidence
that you reference in your cover letter that help you demonstrate your growth
as a reader and writer over the course of this semester. Please remember that
the revised draft included in this tab should include citations, be properly
formatted (MLA), and have an original title. Also, be sure to provide a works
cited page for all sources/images/videos used at the end of the revised
assignment.
➔ Research Project Tab: (use your title). Please remember that the final drafts
of the research project should include citations, be properly formatted (MLA),
and have an original title. Also, be sure to provide a works cited page for all
sources/images/videos used at the end of this project. You should take full
control of your writing, and each final revision and rhetorical move should
work to convince your audience of the skills and processes you’ve developed
this semester in becoming an effective writer/composer.
19
All RC 1000 students will produce a semester-ending digital portfolio that demonstrates
fulfillment of these goals and outcomes.
20