Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A Thesis
Submitted to the College of Science - University of Baghdad
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
Degree of Doctor Philosophy in Organic Chemistry
By
Supervisors
Prof. Dr. Mohammed R. Ahmad Prof. Dr. Abdul Halim A-K Mohammed
2013 A. D. 1434 A. H.
ﻴﻢ ﻲ ِ ﺻﺪق اﻟﻠﱠﻪ اﻟﻌﻠِ
اﻟﻌﻈ ُ
َ ﱡ َ ََ ُ َ
&
Zainab
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am very grateful, and appreciate for all the help and support from
Ass. Prof. Suaad M. Al-Majidi.
I
The efficiency of the prepared overbased magnesium palmitate and
overbased magnesium stearate as viscosity index improvers, were
investigated. It was found that the efficiency of the prepared compound as
viscosity index improvers increases with increasing the concentration of
additives and with increasing the molecular weight of prepared
compounds. The overbased magnesium stearate D7 in 5 wt.%
concentration gave the higher efficiency as viscosity index improvers,
and a good pour point depressant.
II
[2,3-d]pyrimidine-5-one (A2), 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-phenyl-
4,6-dihydro-pyrazolo[3',4':5,6]pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-5-imine (A3) and
N-[4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-phenyl-7-thioxo-7,8dihydropyrazolo
[3',4':5,6]pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-5-yl]thiourea (A4) respectively.
Moreover the compound (A1) was then reacted with different aromatic
aldehydes which gave the corresponding Schiff’s base derivatives (A5-
A10).
Schiff’s base derivatives (A12-A16) were obtained from the
reaction of the compound A11 with different aromatic aldehydes in the
presence of drops of acetic acid under microwave irradiation.
Compounds (A18-A20) and (A21-A25) were synthesized in a similar
manner that used for preparation of (A2-A4) and (A5-A10) respectively.
Most of the prepared compounds were characterized by FTIR,
1
HNMR, 13CNMR and evaluated as antioxidant additives by blending 1%
of each compound with base oil 60 stock.
III
List of Contents
Chapter One
1.1 Lubricants 1
1.1.1 Lubricant Properties 2
1.1.1.1 Viscosity 2
1.1.1.2 Viscosity Index 2
1.1.1.3 Density and Gravity 3
1.1.1.4 Pour Point 4
1.1.1.5 Volatility and Flash Point 4
1.1.1.6 Total Base Number 4
1.1.1.7 Oxidation Stability 5
1.1.2 Lubricants chemistry 7
1.1.3 Lubricants production 9
1.1.4 Lubricants Formulation 11
1.2 Additives 13
1.2.1 Detergents 15
1.2.2 Dispersants 15
1.2.3 Antiwar Additives 15
1.2.4 Rust and Corrosion Inhibitors 16
1.2.5 Viscosity Modifiers 16
1.2.6 Pour Point Depressants 16
1.2.7 Foam Inhibitors 16
1.2.8 Oxidation Inhibitors 17
1.3 Overbased detergent 17
1.3.1 Synthesis of Overbased Detergents 18
1.3.2 Overbasing Description 19
IV
1.3.3 Overbased Detergent Structure 19
1.3.4 Overbased Detergent Types 20
1.3.4.2 Phenates 20
1.3.4.3 Carboxylate and Salicylates 21
1.4 Antioxidants 22
1.4.1 Oxidation Mechanism 24
1.4.1.1 Initiation of the Radical Chain Reaction 24
1.4.1.2 Propagation of the radical chain reaction 25
1.4.1.3 Chain branching 25
1.4.1.3 Chain branching 26
1.4.1.4 Termination of the radical chain reaction 26
1.4.2 Oxidation Inhibition 27
1.4.2.1 Radical Scavengers 27
1.4.2.1.1 Phenols 27
1.4.2.1.2 Amines 28
1.4.2.2 Peroxide Decomposers 30
1.4.2.3 Metal deactivators 31
1.5 Pyrazole 32
1.6 Pyranopyrazoles 33
1.7 Chromene 38
1.8 2-Amino-3-cycano-4-aryl-7,7-dimethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro 40
chromene
1.9 Aim of the work 44
Chapter Two
2.1 Materials 45
2.1.1 Chemicals 45
V
2.1.2 Base Oil 46
2.2 Instrumentation 47
2.3 Test methods 49
2.3.1 Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) 49
2.3.2 Total base number (TBN) 49
2.3.3 Oxidation stability 49
2.3.4 Kinematic Viscosity 50
2.3.5 Viscosity Index (VI) 51
2.4. Experimental Methods 51
2.4.1 Synthesis of Overbased Magnesium Fatty Acid and Calcium 51
Fatty Acid Detergents (D1-D10)
2.4.2 Synthesis of the Starting Compounds for Antioxidants 54
Preparation
2.4.2.1 Synthesis of 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one (S1) 54
2.4.2.2 Synthesis of 3-methyl -2-pyrazolin-5-one (S2) 54
2.4.2.3 Synthesis of 2-(4-hydroxylbenzylidine)malononitrile (S3) 55
2.4.3 Synthesis of 6-Amino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-cyano-3-methyl- 56
1-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole (A1)
2.4.4 Synthesis of 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)- 3-methyl-1-phenyl-4,6- 57
dihydro- pyrazolo[3', 4':5,6]pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-5-one (A2)
2.4.5 Synthesis of 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)- 3-methyl-1-phenyl-4,6- 57
dihydro- pyrazolo[3', 4':5,6]pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-5-imine (A3)
2.4.6 Synthesis of N-[4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)- 3-methyl-1-phenyl-7- 58
thioxo-7,8- dihydropyrazolo [3', 4':5,6] pyrano [2,3-d] pyrimidine-5-
yl] thiourea (A4)
2.4.7 Synthesis of Schiff base derivatives (A5-A10) 59
VI
2.4.8 Synthesis of 6-amino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-2,4- 61
dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile (A11)
2.4.9 Synthesis of Schiff base derivatives (A12-A16) 61
2.4.10 Synthesis of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8,8-dimethyl-8,9-dihydro- 63
3H-chromeno-5-cyano-1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole (A۱۷)
2.4.11 Synthesis of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8,8-dimethyl-8,9-dihydro- 63
3H-chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidine-4,6(5H,7H)-dione (A۱۸)
2.4.12 Synthesis of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-imino-8,8-dimethyl 64
5,7,8,9-tetrahydro-3H-chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-6(4H)-one (A19)
2.4.13 Synthesis of 1-(5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8,8-dimethyl-6-oxo-2- 65
thioxo-2,5,6,7,8,9-hexahydro-1H-chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)
thiourea (A20)
2.4.14 Synthesis of Schiff base derivatives (A21-A25) 65
2.4.15 Synthesis of 7-amino-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,4-dioxo-2,3,4,5- 66
tetrahydro-1H-pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carbonitrile (A26)
2.5 Formulation of oil blends 68
Chapter Three
3.1 Overbased Detergents 69
3.1.1 Synthesis of Overbased Magnesium and Calcium Fatty Acid 69
Salts (D1-D10)
3.1.2 Evaluation of Overbased Magnesium Fatty Acid Salts (D1-D7) 85
as Detergents
3.1.3 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Tests 89
3.1.4 Evaluation of Overbased Magnesium Fatty Acid Salts (D5 and 93
D7) as Antioxidant
3.1.5 Evaluation of Overbased Magnesium Fatty Acid Salts (D5 and 95
VII
D7) as Viscosity Index Improvers and Pour Point Dipressant
3.1.6 Evaluation of Overbased Calcium Fatty Acid Salts (D8-D10) as 99
Detergents
3.3 Antioxidants 103
3.3.1 Synthesis of 2-(4-hydroxylbenzylidine)malononitrile (S3) 103
3.3.2 Synthesis of pyranopyrazoles and pyranopyrimidines derived 106
from 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one (A1-A10)
3.3.2.1 Synthesis of 6-Amino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-cyano-3- 106
methyl-1-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole (A1)
3.3.2.2 Synthesis of 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)- 3-methyl-1-phenyl-4,6- 108
dihydro- pyrazolo[3', 4':5,6]pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-5-one (A2)
3.3.2.3 Synthesis of 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)- 3-methyl-1-phenyl-4,6- 114
dihydro- pyrazolo[3', 4':5,6]pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-5-imine (A3)
3.3.2.4 Synthesis of N-[4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)- 3-methyl-1-phenyl-7- 119
thioxo-7,8- dihydropyrazolo [3', 4':5,6] pyrano [2,3-d] pyrimidine-5-
yl] thiourea (A4)
3.3.2.4 Synthesis of Schiff base derivatives (A5-A10) 123
3.3.3 The comparison between conventional and microwave synthesis 131
3.3.4 Evaluation of pyranopyrazoles and pyranopyrimidines derived 132
from 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one (A1-A7) as antioxidants
3.3.5. Synthesis of 6-Amino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-cyano-3-methyl- 136
1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole (A11) and it Schiff base derivatives
(A12-A16)
3.3.6 Evaluation of 6-Amino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-cyano-3-methyl- 148
1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole (A11) and it Schiff base derivatives
(A12-A14) as antioxidants
VIII
3.3.7 Synthesis of pyranopyrazoles and pyranopyrimidines derived 150
from 5,5-Dimethyl-1,3-cyclohexandion (A17-A25)
3.3.7.1 Synthesis of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8,8-dimethyl-8,9-dihydro- 151
3H-chromeno-5-cyano-1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole (A۱۷)
3.3.7.2 Synthesis of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8,8-dimethyl-8,9-dihydro- 156
3H-chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidine-4,6(5H,7H)-dione (A۱۸)
3.3.7.3 Synthesis of 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-imino-8,8-dimethyl 156
5,7,8,9-tetrahydro-3H-chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-6(4H)-one (A19)
3.3.7.4 Synthesis of 1-(5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8,8-dimethyl-6-oxo-2- 159
thioxo-2,5,6,7,8,9-hexahydro-1H-chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)
thiourea (A20)
3.3.7.5 Synthesis of Schiff base derivatives (A21-A25) 162
3.3.8 Evaluation of pyranopyrazoles and pyranopyrimidines derived 171
from 5,5-Dimethyl-1,3-cyclohexandion (A17-A25) as antioxidants
3.3.9 Synthesis of 7-amino-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,4-dioxo-2,3,4,5- 174
tetrahydro-1H-pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carbonitrile (A26)
3.3.10 Evaluation of 7-Amino-6-cyano-5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5H- 179
pyrano [2,3-d]pyrimidine-2,4-diones (A26) as antioxidants
Conclusion 181
References 183
IX
List of Figure
Figure 1.1 A simplified refinery scheme 10
Figure 1.2 Lubricant composition 11
Figure 1.3 Overbased detergent structure 20
Figure 2.1 The modified microwave irradiation reactor 48
Figure 2.2 Capillary viscometer 50
Figure 2.3 Schematic diagram of the reactor 52
Figure 3.1 FTIR spectrum of overbased magnesium caprylate (D1) 72
Figure 3.2 FTIR spectrum of overbased magnesium caprate (D2) 73
Figure 3.3 FTIR spectrum of overbased magnesium caprylate (D3) 74
Figure 3.4 FTIR spectrum of overbased magnesium myristate (D4) 75
Figure 3.5 FTIR spectrum of overbased magnesium palmitate (D5) 76
Figure 3.6 FTIR spectrum of overbased magnesium oleate (D6) 77
Figure 3.7 FTIR spectrum of overbased magnesium stearate (D7) 78
Figure 3.8 FTIR spectrum of overbased magnesium stearate (D8) 79
Figure 3.9 FTIR spectrum of overbased Calcium oleate (D9) 80
Figure 3.10 FTIR spectrum of overbased Calcium stearate (D10) 81
Figure 3.11 1HNMR spectrum of overbased magnesium palmitate (D5) 82
Figure 3.12 1HNMR spectrum of overbased magnesium stearate (D7) 83
Figure.3.13 The TBN of oil blends with prepared overbased 85
magnesium fatty acid (D1–D7) detergents at different weight
percentages
Figure 3.14 The efficiency of oil blends with prepared overbased 87
magnesium fatty acid detergents (D1-D7)
Figure 3.15 Total sludge, acidity and oxidation products of D5andD7 94
Figure. 3.16 Viscosity index of D5andD7 at different concentrations 96
X
Figure. 3.17 Efficiency of D5 and D7 as VI improver 97
Figure. 3.18 The TBN of oil blends with prepared overbased calcium 100
fatty acid (D8–D10) detergents at different weight percentages
Figure. 3.19 Efficiency of oil blends with prepared overbased calcium 101
fatty acid detergents (D8-D10)
Figure. 3.20 TBN comparison of overbased magnesium detergents 102
with overbased calcium detergents
Figure. 3.21 Efficiency comparison of overbased magnesium 102
detergents with overbased calcium detergents
Figure 3.22 FTIR spectrum of (A1) 109
Figure 3.23 FTIR spectrum of (A2) 111
Figure 3.24 1HNMR spectrum of (A2) 112
13
Figure 3.25 CNMR spectrum of (A2) 113
Figure 3.26 FTIR spectrum of (A3) 115
Figure 3.27 1HNMR spectrum of (A3) 117
13
Figure 3.28 CNMR spectrum of (A3) 118
Figure 3. 29 FTIR spectrum of (A4) 121
Figure 3.30 1HNMR spectrum of (A4) 122
Figure 3.31 FTIR spectrum of (A5) 125
Figure 3.32 FTIR spectrum of (A6) 126
Figure 3.33 FTIR spectrum of (A7) 127
Figure 3.34 FTIR spectrum of (A8) 128
Figure 3.35 FTIR spectrum of (A9) 129
Figure 3.36 FTIR spectrum of (A10) 130
Figure 3.37 Total sludge, acidity and oxidation products of S3, A1-A7 135
Figure 3.38 FTIR spectrum of compound A11 140
XI
Figure 3.39 1HNMR spectrum of compound A11 141
13
Figure 3.40 CNMR spectrum of compound A11 142
Figure 3.41 FTIR spectrum of compound A12 143
Figure 3.42 FTIR spectrum of compound A13 144
Figure 3.43 FTIR spectrum of compound A14 145
Figure 3.44 FTIR spectrum of compound A15 146
Figure 3.45 FTIR spectrum of compound A16 147
Figure 3.46 Total sludge, acidity and oxidation products of A11-A14 149
Figure 3.47 FTIR spectrum of (A17) 153
Figure 3.48 1HNMR of A17 154
Figure 3.49 13CNMR of A17 155
Figure 3.50 FTIR spectrum of A18 157
Figure 3.51 FTIR spectrum of A19 158
Figure 3.52 1H- NMR spectrum of A19 160
Figure 3.53 FTIR spectrum of A20 161
Figure 3.54 FTIR spectrum of A21 164
Figure 3.55 FTIR spectrum of A22 165
Figure 3.56 FTIR spectrum of A23 166
Figure 3.57 FTIR spectrum of A24 167
Figure 3.58 FTIR spectrum of A25 168
Figure 3.59 1HNMR spectrum of A23 169
13
Figure 3.60 CNMR spectrum of A23 170
Figure 3.61 Total sludge, acidity and oxidation products of A17-A25 173
Figure 3.62 FTIR spectrum of A26 176
Figure 3.63 1HNMR spectrum of A26 177
13
Figure 3.64 CNMR spectrum of A26 178
XII
Figure 3.65Total sludge, acidity and oxidation products of 180
(B1,B2 and B3)
List of Table
Table 1.1 Lubricant properties for various applications 6
Table 1.2 Relationship between hydrocarbon structure and physical 8
properties in base oils.
Table 1.3 Typical composition of an engine lubes oil. 12
Table 1.4 Common lubricating oil additives 14
Table 1.5 Range of typical detergent lubricant additives 23
Table 1.6 Some commonly used hindered phenols 29
Table 1.7 Examples of metal deactivators 31
Table 2.1 Chemicals and their properties and manufactures. 45
Table 2.2 Properties of base lubricating oils 40 stock and 60 stock. 47
Table 2.3 Nomenclature, structure, and color of synthesized 53
overbased magnesium and calcium detergents
Table 2.4 The physical properties of the Schiff base derivatives (A5- 60
A10)
Table 2.5 The physical properties of the Schiff base derivatives (A12- 62
A16)
Table 2.6 The physical properties of the Schiff base derivatives (A21- 67
A25)
Table 3.1 : Major FTIR absorptions (cm-1) of synthesized overbased 71
detergents
Table ۳.۲ Total base number of synthesized overbased magnesium 84
and calcium detergents
XIII
Table 3.3 Total base number (mg of KOH/g) of blend oils with (D1- 86
D7) detergents
Table 3.4 The efficiency of overbased magnesium fatty acid detergents 88
(D1-D7)
Table 3.5 The effect on TBN by weight% added and carbon number in 89
the chain of D1-D7
Table 3.6 Multiple Comparison between weight% added of D1-D7 90
Table 3.7 Multiple Comparison between carbon number in the chain 92
Table 3.8 Oxidation stability results of blend oils D5 and D7 94
Table 3.9 Viscosity index of blend oils (D5 and D7) 96
Table 3.10 Efficiency of overbased magnesium fatty acid detergents 97
(D5 and D7) as VI improver
Table 3.11 Pour point (οC) of oil blend with 2and 3.5wt.% overbased 98
Mg-palmitate (D5) and stearate (D7)
Table 3.12 Total base number (mg of KOH/g) of blend oils (D8-D10) 100
Table 3.13 Efficiency of overbased calcium fatty acid detergents (D8- 101
D10)
Table 3.14 FTIR spectral data (cm-1) of Schiff-base derivatives (A5- 124
A10)
Table 3.15 Comparison of conventional and microwave synthesis 132
Table 3.16 Oxidation stability results of blend oils (A1-A7 and S3) 134
Table 3.17 FTIR spectral data (cm-1) of Schiff-base derivatives 139
(A12-A16)
Table 3.18 Oxidation stability results of blend oils (A11-A14) 149
Table 3.19 FTIR spectral data (cm-1) of Schiff-base derivatives 162
(A21-A25
XIV
Table 3.20 oxidation stability results of blend oils A17-A25 172
Table 3.21 Oxidation stability results of blend oils (B1, B2 and B3) 179
List of Scheme
Scheme 1.1 Synthesis of overbased sulfonates 21
Scheme 1.2 Synthesis of overbased metal phenates 21
Scheme 1.3 Synthesis of overbased fatty carboxylates 22
Scheme 1.4 Synthesis of overbased metal salicylates 23
Scheme 1.5 Mechanism of lubricant oxidation 25
Scheme 1.6 Formation of carboxylic acids 26
Scheme 1.7 the mechanism of hindered phenol as antioxidant 28
Scheme 1.8 The mechanism of diphenylamine (DPA) as antioxidant 28
Scheme 1.9 Synthesis routes of ADPAs antioxidants 30
Scheme 3.1 General mechanism of overbased magnesium or calcium 31
fatty acid salts synthesis
Scheme 3.2 Knoevenagel condensation mechanism 104
Scheme 3.3 Synthetic rout of compounds A1-A10 107
Scheme 3.4 Formation mechanism of compound (A1) 108
Scheme 3.5 Formation mechanism of compound (A3) 114
Scheme 3.6 Formation mechanism of compound (A4) 119
Scheme 3.7 General mechanism of Schiff-base formation 123
Scheme 3.8 Synthesis and reactions of compound (A11) 136
Scheme 3.9 Synthetic rout of compounds A17-A25 150
Scheme 3.10 Formation mechanism of A26 174
XV
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Lubricants
۱
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1.1.1 Viscosity:
۲
Chapter One: Introduction
L−U
VI = × 100 ………. 1.1
L−H
۳
Chapter One: Introduction
٤
Chapter One: Introduction
٥
Chapter One: Introduction
temperature
Application
Dispersant
Corrosion
Oxidation
resistance
Viscosity
Friction
fluidity
control
control
Foam
Index
Low-
No.
Engine Oils:
1. Gasoline √ √ √ √ √ √ √
2. Diesel √ √ √ √ √ √ √
3. Stationary Gas √ √ √ √ √ √
Hydraulic fluids:
1. Tractor √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Hydraulic
2. Industrial √ √ √ √ √ √
Hydraulic
Gear oils:
1. Automotive √ √ √ √ √ √
2. Industrial √ √ √ √ √ √
Miscellaneous Lubricants:
1. Industrial Oils √ √ √ √ √
2. Turbine Oils √ √ √ √ √
٦
Chapter One: Introduction
Chemical composition of the base oils depends upon the crude oil
source, and the refining process. Base oils consist of the following
organic compounds [14,17]:
- Aromatics: Basic structures have one to six or more benzene rings with
alkyl substituent. Alkyl-substituted benzenes with 1,4 alkyl groups have
high VIs and good oxidation resistance, whereas fused polyaromatic
structures are undesirable.
۷
Chapter One: Introduction
۸
Chapter One: Introduction
۹
Chapter One: Introduction
۱۰
Chapter One: Introduction
0-1%
Performance Package
2-20%
Viscosity Modifer
65-98%
0-30%
Base Oil
۱۱
Chapter One: Introduction
Component Percentage
Base oil 80
Detergents 2
Dispersants 6
Viscosity modifiers 9
Antioxidant 1
Antiwear (ZDDP) 2
۱۲
Chapter One: Introduction
1.2 Additives
The use of additives became common only after the 1930s when
more compact and faster engines were developed, and enormous growth
has been seen since in both their production rates and the scope of their
applications [17,24].
Antioxidants reduce the tendency of oil to oxidize and form sludge and
acids. The most common additives are listed in table 1.4 [25].
۱۳
Chapter One: Introduction
۱٤
Chapter One: Introduction
1.2.1 Detergents
1.2.2 Dispersants
۱٥
Chapter One: Introduction
۱٦
Chapter One: Introduction
The name "overbased" detergent comes from the fact that these
detergents contain more base than is required to neutralize the acidic
components [43]. The TBN indicates a detergent’s ability to neutralize
acids. In additives and formulated lubricants, the TBN is expressed as mg
KOH/g of additive [44].
۱۷
Chapter One: Introduction
In general, the reaction between the organic acid and the inorganic
base is not good because of poor contact between the two reactants. A
number of compounds, called promoters, are used to facilitate salt
formation and the subsequent carbonation.
۱۸
Chapter One: Introduction
۱۹
Chapter One: Introduction
1.3.4 .1 Sulfonates
۲۰
Chapter One: Introduction
1.3.4.2 Phenates
۲۱
Chapter One: Introduction
۲۲
Chapter One: Introduction
2- Soap content,% 10 - 50 30 - 50 10 - 45
۲۳
Chapter One: Introduction
1.4 Antioxidants
metal deactivators.
۲٤
Chapter One: Introduction
۲٥
Chapter One: Introduction
۲٦
Chapter One: Introduction
1.4.2.1.1 Phenols
۲۷
Chapter One: Introduction
1.4.2.1.2 Amines
۲۸
Chapter One: Introduction
2,6-Di-tert-butyl-phenol
82
(Industrial oils and
power transmission
fluids)
2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-
methylphenol (BHT)
83
(Industrial oils and
power transmission
fluids)
3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-
hydroxy hydrocinnamat
84-86
alkyl ( C7–C18) ester
(Engine oils, power
transmission fluids, and
industrial oils)
2,2′-Methylene bis(4-
methyl-6-tert-butyl-
87,88
phenol)
(Engine and industrial
oils)
۲۹
Chapter One: Introduction
۳۰
Chapter One: Introduction
113
Benzotriazole
114,
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 115
Chelators:
N,N′-Disalicylidene-1,2- 111
diaminopropane
۳۱
Chapter One: Introduction
1.5 Pyrazole
۳۲
Chapter One: Introduction
O O Me
NH2NH2
N
Me OEt O
N
(1)
O O Me
Ph NH NH2
N
Me OEt O
N
Ph
(2)
1.6 Pyranopyrazoles
۳۳
Chapter One: Introduction
R R
CN
CN
N N
EtOH
N base
CN N
O O NH2
(3) (4)
EtOH
N CN
base
CN
N
H O N
CN N
H O NH2
(1) (5) (6)
۳٤
Chapter One: Introduction
O
H2N H H2N
O O
Ph CN N N
NH N NH
N
CN
CN CN
(8) (5)
(9)
The antioxidant activity of the prepared compound (12), using the turbine
base oil, was evaluated. The formulated blend oil containing 1.6 wt.% of
۳٥
Chapter One: Introduction
(12) gave higher oxidation stability than a blend containing 0.8 wt.% of
commercial antioxidant additive [139].
H3CO O
H3CO NC NH2
CN
HO C C N
H Ph EtOH/ Piperidine HO O
CN N
reflux, 2 h
H3C
N
(10) (11)
N Ph
H3C
(12)
Heravi et al. [141] reported facile method for the synthesis of 1,4-
dihydropyrano[2,3-c] pyrazole derivatives (4) via three-component one-
pot condensation of 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one (2),
arylaldehydes and malononitrile in the presence of heteropolyacid
(H14[NaPW12O40]), as a green and reusable catalyst in water or ethanol
under refluxing conditions.
۳٦
Chapter One: Introduction
CH3
Ar
H3C
N CN CN
ArCHO H14[NaPW12O40]
N Water or Ethanol NH
CN
Refluxing
Ph O (13) N
O NH
2
Ph
(2)
(4)
NC NH2 NC NH2
O O
Ar O Ar O
CH2(CN)2
H3C OEt + NH2.NH2.H2O
Ar-COH
NH N
H3C N H3C N
H
(6)
۳۷
Chapter One: Introduction
1.7 Chromene
۳۸
Chapter One: Introduction
۳۹
Chapter One: Introduction
1.8 2-Amino-3-cycano-4-aryl-7,7-dimethyl-5,6,7,8-
tetrahydro chromene
O
CHO CN CN
catalyst
+ +
CN O O O NH2
(14)
٤۰
Chapter One: Introduction
O
CHO CN CN
CN
MgO,R.T. O O
+
Grinding CN MgO,R.T.
CN NH2
Grinding O
(14)
٤۱
Chapter One: Introduction
٤۲
Chapter One: Introduction
٤۳
Chapter One: Introduction
٤٤
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
2.1 Materials
2.1.1 Chemicals
Series of fatty acids (1-7) and many chemicals (8-14) were used to
synthesize different overbased detergents (D1-D10). The starting
compounds (S1, S2, and S3) were synthesized by using the chemicals
(16-22). These starting compounds and other chemicals (23-36) were
used to prepare the antioxidants (A1-A26).
The chemicals were used as received from suppliers except
ethylacetoacetate, which was purified by distillation [178].
Table 2.1 shows the properties and manufacturers of the used chemicals.
Molecular
Mp. or Purity
No Chemicals weight, Supplier
Bp., οC %
g/mol
1. Octoic (Caprylic) acid 144.22 15-17 98 BDH
2. Decanoic (Capric) acid 172.27 29-31 99 BDH
3. Dodecanoic (Lauric) acid 200.32 43-44 98 H&W Ltd.
4. Tetradecanoic (Myristic) acid 228.38 53-54 97 H&W Ltd.
5. Hexadecanoic (Palmitic) acid 256.43 61-63 99 BDH
6. Octadecanoic (Stearic) acid 284.48 67-69 95 MERCK
7. 9-Octadecenoic (Oleic) acid 282.47 13-14 97 H&W Ltd.
8. Magnesium oxide 40.31 2852 99 BDH.
9. Ammonium hydroxide 35.04 37.7 98 Fluka AG
High National
10. Carbon dioxide gas 44 _ purity gas
(>90) company
11. Toluene 92.14 110-111 99 Fluka AG
12. Ethanol 46.07 79-81 95 BDH
13. Calcium oxide 56.08 2613 98 Fluka, AG
14. Calcium hydroxide 74.093 580 98 Fluka, AG
15. n-Hexane 86.18 68-69 99 BDH
16. 4-Hydroxybenzaldehyde 122.12 113-116 99 Fluka, AG
٤٥
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
٤٦
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
Standard test
No. Specification 40 stock 60 stock
method
Kinematic viscosity
1. 14 63.0 ASTM-D 445
at 40 °C, cSt (mm²/s)
Kinematic viscosity
2. 3.3 8.3 ASTM-D 445
at 100 °C, cSt (mm²/s)
3. Viscosity index 101 100 ASTM D- 2270
4. Specific gravity at 60/60 οF 0.856 0.884 ASTM D-4052
5. Pour point ,°C -21 -6 ASTM D-97
6. Flash Point, °C 202 250 ASTM D-92
7. Color 1.0 3.0 ASTM D-1500
2.2 Instrumentation
1. Melting points were measured using Stuart. Scientific. SMP1 melting
point apparatus and are uncorrected.
2. Infrared spectra were recorded on:
- Shimadzu FTIR-8400S Spectrophotometer as KBr disc, (Department of
Chemistry, College of Science, Baghdad University).
-Shimadzu FTIR prestige-21 Spectrophotometer as KBr disc, (Ibn-Sina
Center).
3. Proton and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance 1H NMR and 13
C
NMR spectra were recorded on:
Bruker DPx-400, using CDCl3 as solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as
internal reference (Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.).
٤۷
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
Bruker model ultra shield at 300 MHz using DMSO- d6 and CDCl3 as
solvents and TMS as internal reference (Middle East Technical
university, Ankara, Turkey).
4. Rotary evaporator Yamato RE 510 was used for evaporating solutions.
5. Galanz D90 D25 EL (800W) domestic microwave oven was modified
to use as microwave irradiation reactor as shown in figure 2.1. Infrared
thermometer Victor 305 B (- 50οC to 550οC ) was used to determine the
temperature.
٤۸
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
Total base number of the oil can be calculated by using the following
equation:
N × V × 56.1
TBN =
W
Where, TBN=Total base number (mg of KOH/g oil)
N =Normality of HCl (meq/mL)
V =Volume of HCl, mL, used to titrate the sample
56.1 =Equivalent weight of KOH
W =Weight of oil sample, g
٤۹
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
at 120°C. After the test the volatile acids, the total acidity (T.A) of the oil
and the total precipitated sludge (T.S) were measured and their values
were used to calculate the total oxidation products (TOP).
T. A
TOP% = T. S + 180
561
٥۰
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
The desired fatty acid (0.05 mol) and 20 g of diluents oil were
added to the flask and dissolved in 100 mL mixture of toluene and
ethanol (9:1), then active-60 magnesium oxide (20.15 g , 0.5 mol) was
added to the diluted mixture. The resulted mixture was stirred for 1 h and
then heated up to 65οC. 10mL of ammonia solution was added to the
mixture and 60 mL/min of gaseous CO2 for 3.5 hours was then
introduced into the reactor through gas dispersion tube via the gas flow
meter. The desired overbased magnesium fatty acid detergent was
obtained by filtration through fluted filter paper for residue removal, and
filtrate evaporation to remove the solvents.
٥۱
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
٥۲
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
Comp. Common
Chemical structure Color
no. name
Magnesium (CH3(CH2)6COO)2Mg. Pale
D1
caprylate nMgCO3 yellow
Magnesium (CH3(CH2)8COO)2Mg.
D2 white
caprate nMgCO3
Magnesium (CH3(CH2)10COO)2Mg.
D3 white
laurate nMgCO3
Magnesium (CH3(CH2)12COO)2Mg. Pale
D4
myristate nMgCO3 yellow
Magnesium (CH3(CH2)14COO)2Mg. Pale
D5
palmitate nMgCO3 yellow
Magnesium (CH3(CH2)7CH=CH- Pale
D6
oleate (CH2)7COO)2Mg. nMgCO3 yellow
Magnesium (CH3(CH2)16COO)2Mg.
D7 white
stearate nMgCO3
Calcium (CH3(CH2)14COO)2Ca. Pale
D8
palmitate nCaCO3 yellow
Calcium (CH3(CH2)16COO)2Ca. Pale
D9
stearate nCaCO3 yellow
Calcium (CH3(CH2)7CH=CH-
D10 yellow
oleate (CH2)7COO)2Ca. nCaCO3
٥۳
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
H3C N
N
H3C HN
N
٥٤
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
CN
OH C C
H
CN
٥٥
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
NC NH2
HO O
H3C N
٥٦
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
HN
O C N
OH O
H3C N
HN
HN C N
OH O
H3C N
٥۷
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
S S
N
C
H2N N NH
H
HO O
H3C N
٥۸
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
NC N C Ar
H
HO O
N
H3 C N
٥۹
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
Table 2.4 The physical properties of the Schiff’s base derivatives (A5-A10)
Molecular
Comp. Mp., Yield,
Ar. Compound name Formula weight, Color ο
no. C %
g/mol
O
NH 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-6-((2-oxoindolin-3-
A5 172-
ylidene)amino)-1-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3- C28 H20 O3 N5 474.49 orange 68.92
174
c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile
Me
6-(4-(dimethylamino) benzylideneamino)-4-(4-
A6 N 216-
hydroxyphenyl) -3-methyl-1-phenyl-1,4- C29 H25 O2 N5 475.54 red 60.57
220
Me dihydropyrano [2,3-c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile
HO
6-(4-chlorobenzylidene amino)-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-
A8 Off- 198-
Cl 3-methyl-1-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyrano [2,3- C27 H19 O2 N4 Cl 466.92 52.31
white 200
c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile
6-(4-nitrobenzylidene amino)-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-
A9 NO2 220-
methyl-1-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole-5- C27 H19 O4 N5 477.47 orange 82.68
224
carbonitrile
H 6-((1H-pyrrol-2-yl)methyleneamino)-4-(4-
N
hydroxyphenyl)-3 178-
A10 C25H19O2N5 421.45 yellow 66.32
-methyl-1-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole- 182
5-carbonitrile
٦۰
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
NC N C Ar
H
HO O
NH
H3C N
٦۱
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
Table 2.5 The physical properties of the Schiff’s base derivatives (A12-A16)
Molecular
Comp. Mp., Yield,
Ar. Compound name Formula weight Color ο
no. C %
g/mol
H
N 6-(((1H-pyrrol-2-yl) methylene)amino)-4-(4-
A12 hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-2,4-dihydro- C19 H15 O2 N5 345.35 yellow 152-154 68.38
pyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile
O
NH 6-((2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)amino)- 4- (4-
hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-2,4-
A13 C22H16 O3 N5 398.39 yellow 178-180 70.21
dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile
6-((4-chlorobenzylidene)amino)-4-(4-
A14 Cl hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-2,4-dihydro- C21 H15 O2 N4 Cl 390.82 white 208-210 50.73
pyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile
6-((4-nitrobenzylidene)amino)-4-(4-
A15 NO2 hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl -2,4- C21 H15 O4 N5 401.37 yellow 128-132 80.1
dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole -5-carbonitrile
6-((4-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-4-(4-
A16 OH
hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-2,4-dihydro- C21H15 O3 N4 371.37 orange 200-204 52.83
pyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile
٦۲
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
NC NH2
HO O
CH3
H3C
O N
HO O
CH3
H3C
٦۳
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
HN N
OH O
CH3
H3C
٦٤
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
OH O
CH3
H3C
CN N C Ar
H
HO O
CH3
H3C
٦٥
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
compound instead of A1. Table 2.6 lists the physical properties of the
Schiff’s base derivatives (A21-A25).
NC NH2
HO O
O N H
H O
٦٦
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
Table 2.6 The physical properties of the Schiff’s base derivatives (A21-A25)
Molecular
Comp.
Ar. Compound name Formula weight, Color Mp., οC Yield, %
no.
g/mol
O
NH 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-7,7-dimethyl -5-oxo-2-
A21 ((2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)amino)-5,6,7,8- C26 H22 O4 N3 440.47 orange 180-184 69.37
tetrahydro-4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile
H
N 2-((1H-pyrrol-2-yl) methylene -amino)-4-(4-
Pale
A22 hydroxyphenyl)-7,7-dimethyl-5-oxo-5,6,7,8- C23 H21 O3 N3 387.43 154-158 57.85
green
tetrahydro -4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile
Me
2-(4-(dimethylamino) benzylidene -amino)-4-
N (4-hydroxyphenyl)-7,7-dimethyl-5-oxo-
A23 C27 H27 O3 N3 441.52 yellow 176-178 52.95
5,6,7,8-tetrahydro -4H-chromene -3-
Me
carbonitrile
NO2
4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-7,7-dimethyl -2-(4-nitro
A24 benzylideneamino)-5-oxo-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro- C25 H21O5N3 443.45 yellow 168-172 77.02
4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile
HO
٦۷
Chapter Two: Experimental Work
٦۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
MO + H2O → M(OH)2
Where, M = Mg or Ca
CH3(CH2)7CH=CH(CH2)6CH2-
٦۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۷۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۷۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)14COO)2Mg.nMgCO3
۷۲
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)8COO)2Mg. nMgCO3
۷۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)10COO)2Mg.nMgCO3
۷٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)12COO)2Mg.nMgCO3
۷٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)14COO)2Mg.nMgCO3
۷٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)7CH=CH-(CH2)7COO)2Mg. nMgCO3
۷۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)16COO)2Mg.nMgCO3
۷۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)14COO)2Ca.nCaCO3
79
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)7CH=CH-(CH2)7COO)2Ca. nCaCO3
80
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)16COO)2Ca.nCaCO3
81
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)14COO)2Mg.nMgCO3
82
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
(CH3(CH2)16COO)2Mg.nMgCO3
83
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Total base number (TBN) were determined for all the prepared
overbased magnesium and calcium fatty acid salts (D1-D10) according to
ASTM D-4739, and the results are listed in table 3.2.
Comp. TBN
Common name
no. mg KOH/g
Overbased magnesium
D1 76
caprylate
Overbased magnesium
D2 103
caprate
Overbased magnesium
D3 123
laurate
Overbased magnesium
D4 258
myristate
Overbased magnesium
D5 346
palmitate
Overbased magnesium
D6 398
oleate
Overbased magnesium
D7 420
stearate
Overbased calcium
D8 378
palmitate
D9 Overbased calcium oleate 426
Overbased calcium
D10
stearate 411
84
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Total base number (TBN) were determined for the 60 stock oil
blends with different overbased magnesium fatty acid detergents (D1-
D7) in different dosages (1, 2, 3.5, and 5 %), the results are shown in
table 3.3.
Figure 3.13 shows the TBN of oil blends with prepared overbased
magnesium fatty acid detergents. This figure show that the overbased
magnesium palmitate (D5), oleate (D6) and stearate (D7) detergents give
the higher TBN.
25
20
Total Base Number
15
10
in the oil
٥
5 ۳.٥
۲
0
۱
۸٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Table 3.3 Total base number (mg of KOH/g) of blend oils with (D1-D7) detergents
Oil with Oil with Oil with Oil with Oil with Oil with Oil with
Wt.,% of overbased overbased overbased overbased overbased overbased overbased
detergent Mg- Mg- Mg- Mg- Mg- Mg- Mg-
in the oil caprylate caprate laurate myristate palmitate oleate stearate
(D1) (D2) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (D7)
۸٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Palmitic and stearic acids are the most common saturated fatty
acids found in animals, and plants. Because they are inexpensively
available and environmentally friendly, so palmitic and stearic acids can
be recommended for lubricating oil detergent preparation.
2000
1500
1000
500 ٥
0 ۳.٥
۲
۱
۸۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Table 3.4 The efficiency of overbased magnesium fatty acid detergents (D1-D7)
۸۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Table 3.5 The effect on TBN by weight% added and carbon number
in the chain of D1-D7
Moreover, all the TBN results were treated by using t-test analysis
for comparison between the weight percentages added of different
۸۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۹۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
significant difference when the comparison with 3.5% and 5%, while
there is no significant difference with 2%. Also a significant difference in
the effect of adding 2% comparing with 5%, could be concluded, but
there is no significant difference comparing with 3.5%. A significant
difference in the effect of adding 3.5% comparing with 5% was observed.
۹۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Method (I) Carbon (J) Carbon Sig. Method (I) Carbon (J) Carbon Sig.
number number Compound Compound
Tukey D1 (C8) D2 (C10) 1.000 Scheffe D1 (C8) D2 (C10) 1.000
HSD D3 (C12) 1.000 D3 (C12) 1.000
D4 (C14) 0.999 D4 (C14) 1.000
D5 (C16) 0.989 D5 (C16) 0.997
D6 (C18:1) 0.710 D6 (C18:1) 0.869
D7 (C18:0) 0.786 D7 (C18:0) 0.910
D2 (C10) D1 (C8) 1.000 D2 (C10) D1 (C8) 1.000
D3 (C12) 1.000 D3 (C12) 1.000
D4 (C14) 1.000 D4 (C14) 1.000
D5 (C16) 0.996 D5 (C16) 0.999
D6 (C18:1) 0.784 D6 (C18:1) 0.909
D7 (C18:0) 0.850 D7 (C18:0) 0.942
D3 (C12) D1 (C8) 1.000 D3 (C12) D1 (C8) 1.000
D2 (C10) 1.000 D2 (C10) 1.000
D4 (C14) 1.000 D4 (C14) 1.000
D5 (C16) 1.000 D5 (C16) 1.000
D6 (C18:1) 0.877 D6 (C18:1) 0.954
D7 (C18:0) 0.925 D7 (C18:0) 0.974
D4 (C14) D1 (C8) 0.999 D4 (C14) D1 (C8) 1.000
D2 (C10) 1.000 D2 (C10) 1.000
D3 (C12) 1.000 D3 (C12) 1.000
D5 (C16) 1.000 D5 (C16) 1.000
D6 (C18:1) 0.932 D6 (C18:1) 0.977
D7 (C18:0) 0.963 D7 (C18:0) 0.988
D5 (C16) D1 (C8) 0.989 D5 (C16) D1 (C8) 0.997
D2 (C10) 0.996 D2 (C10) 0.999
D3 (C12) 1.000 D3 (C12) 1.000
D4 (C14) 1.000 D4 (C14) 1.000
D6 (C18:1) 0.980 D6 (C18:1) 0.994
D7 (C18:0) 0.992 D7(C18:0) 0.998
D6(C18:1) D1 (C8) 0.710 D6 (C18:1) D1 (C8) 0.869
D2 (C10) 0.784 D2 (C10) 0.909
D3 (C12) 0.877 D3 (C12) 0.954
D4 (C14) 0.932 D4 (C14) 0.977
D5 (C16) 0.980 D5 (C16) 0.994
D7 (C18:0) 1.000 D7 (C18:0) 1.000
D7 (C18:0) D1 (C8) 0.786 D7 (C18:0) D1 (C8) 0.910
D2 (C10) 0.850 D2(C10) 0.942
D3 (C12) 0.925 D3 (C12) 0.974
D4 (C14) 0.963 D4 (C14) 0.988
D5 (C16) 0.992 D5 (C16) 0.998
D6 (C18:1) 1.000 D6(C18:1) 1.000
۹۲
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Results given in table 3.8 and figure 3.15 show that the blends with
2% by weight overbased Mg-palmitate (D5) or overbased Mg-stearate
(D7) have higher oxidation stability compared with the blend of the same
oil with standard antioxidant used by Midland Refineries Company.
۹۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Blank Mg-palmitate Mg-stearate Standard
(D5) (D7)
۹٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Long chain n-paraffin give the highest viscosity index to an oil [7].
A possible explanation may be, as the temperature is raised, the lube oil
viscosity gets a decrease and as a result of that the size of the micelle
increase. This increase in micelle size counterbalanced the reduction of
the viscosity of the lube oil and hence, decreases the change of viscosity
with temperature of the mixture [185].
The efficiency of oil blends with D5 and D7 was calculated and the
results were listed in table 3.10. Figure 3.14 obviously shows that the
overbased magnesium stearate (D7) in 5 wt.% concentration gives the
highest efficiency.
۹٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
140
130
Viscosity Index
120
Blank
Mg-palmitate (D5)
110
Mg-stearate (D7)
100 Standard
90
۱ ۲ ۳.٥ ٥
Wt% in the oil
۹٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
1 6 7 18
2 12 17 21
3.5 23 25 28
5 26 35 36
40
35
30
Efficiency %
25
20
15
٥
wt.% in the oil
10
۳.٥
5
۲
0
۱
Mg-
palmitate Mg-stearate
(D7) Standard
(D5)
۹۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Table 3.11 Pour point (οC) of oil blend with 2and 3.5wt.% overbased
۹۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Table 3.12 lists TBN of the 60 stock oil blends with prepared
overbased calcium fatty acid detergents (D8, D9, and D10) in different
dosages (1, 2, 3.5, and 5 %). According the value of TBN, the efficiency
was calculated and lists in table 3.13.
۹۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Table 3.12 Total base number (mg of KOH/g) of blend oils (D8-D10)
10
9
8
Total Base Number
7
6
Wieght (% )of detergent
5
4
in the oil
3 ٥
2 ۳.٥
1 ۲
0 ۱
Figure. 3.18 The TBN of oil blends with prepared overbased calcium
fatty acid (D8–D10) detergents at different weight percentages
۱۰۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
1200
1000
Efficiency %
800
600
٥
400
۳.٥ Wieght (% )
200
۲
0
۱
۱۰۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
25
20
15
10
5
٥
0 ۳.٥
۲
۱
3000
2500
2000
1500
Efficiency %
1000
Wieght (% )of detergent in the oil
500
٥
0 ۳.٥
۲
۱
۱۰۲
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
3.3 Antioxidants
۱۰۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۰٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
CN
OH C C
H
CN
۱۰٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۰٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
O NC NH2
CN
HO C C + H3C N ph HO O
H
N
CN
(S3) N
H3C ph
N
HN (A1)
H
HCOO O
O N NH 2
C
H
HN
4 CN
HO O
HS
HN N
2N
N
H3C ph
N HO O
(A2)
(Schif f base)
H
O
C
N
H3C ph
N
Ar
(A3)
S S
N
C
H2N N NH
H
HO O
Me
O , N N
H3C ph
N Me N
H
(A6)
(A5) (A4)
OH NC N C Ar
H
Ar = , Cl
(A7) HO O
(A8)
,
NO2 N
N
H3C ph
H N
(A9) (A10)
۱۰۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۰۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NC NH2
HO O
H3C N
The 1H- NMR spectrum (figure 3.24) showed the singlet signals at
δ10.81 and δ9.14 were assigned for OH and NH protons respectively.
Proton of CH pyrmidone appeared at δ 8.6. Aromatic protons appeared as
multiplet at δ7.95- δ6.6 and CH3 protons appeared at δ2.1 as singlet.
13
CNMR spectrum (figure 3.25) showed a characteristic signals at
173.7 ppm for C=O, the carbons of pyran ring (C-O-C) appeared at
163.5ppm and 162.4ppm, while carbons of C=N for pyrimidone and
pyrazol rings appeared at 148.9ppm and 138.9ppm, respectively.
Aromatic carbons attached to phenolic OH, and to N atom appeared at
152.3ppm, and 137.9ppm, respectively. The aromatic carbons of phenol
ring appeared at 129.4, 128.7, and 115.3ppm, while the aromatic carbons
of phenyl ring appeared at 125.4, 124.8, and 123.1ppm. Carbon of methyl
group appeared at 13.6ppm [181].
۱۱۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۱۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
HN
O C N
OH O
H3C N
HN
O C N
OH O
H3C N
13
Figure 3.25 CNMR spectrum of (A2)
۱۱۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۱٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
H2N CH
NH2 N C NH
NC
HO O H C NH2 HO O
N N
H3C H3C ph
ph N
N
(2)
OH2
N HN HN CH
H2N C N HN C N HN C NH
HO O HO O HO O
N N N
H3C ph H3C ph H3C ph
N N N
۱۱٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۱٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
In the 1H- NMR spectrum (figure 3.27) two signals for OH and NH
as a singlet at δ10.6 and δ9.1, respectively. The appearance of signal at
δ7.44 for 2H (NH2) indicates that compound A3 exist in a tautomeric
mixture as shown in scheme 3.5. Aromatic protons appeared as multiplet
at δ7.7- δ6.6. The signal at δ3.6 was assigned to pyran proton, while CH3
protons appeared at δ1.99.
13
CNMR spectrum (figure 3.28) showed signals at 164.3 and 155.7
ppm for C=N pyrazol and imine, while the C-OH appeared at 150 ppm.
Carbon of pyrimidin appeared at 148.4 ppm, while carbons of pyran ring
(C-O-C) appeared at 139.6 and 138 ppm. The aromatic carbons appeared
at 131.5-118.4ppm. A signal at 107.5 ppm was attributed to carbon
attached to the nitrogen atom of NH2 [181].
۱۱٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
HN
HN C N
OH O
H3C N
۱۱۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
HN
HN C N
OH O
H3C N
13
Figure 3.28 CNMR spectrum of (A3)
۱۱۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NH
C S : NH4
NC NH
NC NH2
O
Ar
O NH4-S-C N
Ar
N
H3 C Ph
N N
H3 C Ph
N
H S H S H2N S
N N C
S
H
H2N C N N H HN N H N C NH
NH4-S-CN
O O
Ar O Ar
Ar
N N
N H3 C
H3 C Ph Ph
N H3 C Ph N
N
Ar = HO
۱۱۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۲۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۲۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
S S
N
C
H2N N NH
H
HO O
H3C N
۱۲۲
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
The FTIR spectra of the prepared compounds are shown in figures (3.31-
3.36) and the characteristic absorption bands are listed in table 3.14.
۱۲۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NC N C Ar
H
HO O
N
H3 C N
NH ν N-H
1654.9 3201.8
A5 3066.8 2194.9 813.9
1612.5 νC=O
1728.2
Me
N 1668.3
A6 2210.3 -
Me 1614.3 817.6
HO
1654.8
A7 3068.5 2200.1 -
1618.2 817.7
1647.2 ν C-Cl
A8 Cl 2175.7
1612.5 678.9
810.1
ν NO2
1647.1 808.2 1514asym
A9 NO2 3072 2216
1612.4 1342.3sy
m.
H
N
ν N-H
A10 3058.9 2181.3 1656.7
813.9 3315.4
۱۲٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۲٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۲٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۲۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۲۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۳۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۳۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۳۲
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
products (TOP) was determined, the lower the TOP value the better the
oxidation stability. Total sludge (wt%), volatile acidity and soluble
acidity (mg KOH/g oil) are measured, a low result indicates good
performance [195].
The evaluation results of oil blends are shown in table 3.16, and
figure 3.37. The results showed that blend A5 has higher oxidation
stability compared with the base oil (blank) and approximately the same
oxidation stability as the blend with standard antioxidant, while blend A4
has higher oxidation stability than the blend with standard antioxidant.
According to the structure of compound A5, which has isatine ring, an
active scavenger of radicals [196], while compound A4 has a fused
pyranopyrimidine moiety with thiourea, and thiourea derivatives are
autooxidation inhibition and have a decomposition effect of
hydroperoxide [197].
۱۳۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Table 3.16 Oxidation stability results of blend oils (A1-A7 and S3)
Volatile acidity 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.005 0.0197 0.0049 0.0148 0.0123 0.00 0.006
(mg KOH/g oil)
Soluble acidity 0.2571 0.1285 0.2571 0.1283 1.111 0.01234 0.087 0.111 0.385 0.123
(mg KOH/g oil)
Total acidity 0.2596 0.131 0.2596 0.1333 1.1307 0.01724 0.1018 0.1233 0.385 0.129
(mg KOH/g oil)
Total sludge 0.280 0.723 0.360 0.540 0.092 0.07989 0.1084 0.1664 0.878 0.088
(wt,%)
Total oxidation 0.363 0.765 0.4432 0.582 0.471 0.0854 0.1299 0.206 1.0015 0.1298
product (TOP,%)
۱۳٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Blank S3 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 Standard
Total sludge (wt%) Total oxidation product (TOP%) Total acidity (mg KOH/g oil)
Figure 3.37 Total sludge, acidity and oxidation products of S3, A1-A7
۱۳٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۳٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۳٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
13
CNMR spectrum (figure 3.40) showed a characteristic signals at
161.1ppm, and 156.4ppm for the carbons of pyran ring (C-O-C) while,
C=N for pyrazol ring appeared at 156.4ppm. The carbon attached to OH
in aromatic ring appeared at 155.2ppm while, the other aromatic carbons
appeared at 135.2-115.5ppm. Carbon of methyl group appeared at
10.2ppm [198].
۱۳۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۳۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
nC=N
Comp. Ar. nN-H nCH nC≡N & γ C-H Other
no. arom. nC=C arom. bands
H
N nN-H
A12 3344.5 3020.5 2214 1643.5 810 3238.8
1612.4
nN-H
O
NH
3367.0 3032.1 2175.7 1647 815 3309
A13 1613
nC=O
1725
nC-Cl
Cl 3387.9 3012 2177 1627.2 813.9
A14 679.8
1612.5
nNO2
A15 NO2 3375.4 3074.5 2183 1668.6 796 1519asym
1600 1342sym
۱۳۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٤۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
12.053
9.283
6.971
6.950
6.792
6.708
6.687
4.479
3.377
2.513
2.508
1.792
NAME antep Z8
EXPNO 1
PROCNO 1
Date_ 20130225
Time 16.37
INSTRUM spect
PROBHD 5 mm DUL 13C-1
PULPROG zg
TD 65536
SOLVENT DMSO
NS 4
DS 0
SWH 8223.685 Hz
FIDRES 0.125483 Hz
AQ 3.9846387 sec
RG 57
DW 60.800 usec
DE 6.00 usec
TE 300.0 K
antep Z8
D1 1.00000000 sec
TD0 1
0.47
1.04
1.03
1.00
0.47
1.58
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ppm
۱٤۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
161.09
156.48
155.21
135.98
135.23
128.91
121.40
115.57
98.53
58.20
40.57
40.36
40.15
39.94
39.73
39.52
39.31
35.94
10.23
NAME antep Z8
EXPNO 2
PROCNO 1
Date_ 20130225
Time 16.40
INSTRUM spect
PROBHD 5 mm DUL 13C-1
PULPROG zgpg30
TD 65536
SOLVENT DMSO
NS 285
antep Z8
DS 4
SWH 24038.461 Hz
FIDRES 0.366798 Hz
AQ 1.3631988 sec
RG 1030
DW 20.800 usec
DE 6.50 usec
TE 300.0 K
D1 2.00000000 sec
D11 0.03000000 sec
TD0 1
13
Figure 3.40 CNMR spectrum of compound A11
۱٤۲
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
H
N
NC N C
H
HO O
N
H3C N
H
۱٤۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
N NH
HO O
N
H3C N
H
۱٤٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٤٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NC N C NO2
H
HO O
N
H3C N
H
۱٤٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NC N C OH
H
HO O
N
H3C N
H
۱٤۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
The results showed that all the blends A11-A14 has higher
oxidation stability compared with the base oil (blank), but still less than
the oxidation stability of the blend with standard antioxidant.
All the blends gave low total sludge, and total oxidation product
(TOP%), which were in the acceptable range. But they showed
unexpected high total acidity.
۱٤۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Blank A11 A12 A13 A14 Standard
۱٤۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
150
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
151
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
13
CNMR spectrum (figure 3.49) showed a characteristic signals at
196.1ppm for C=O, 164.3ppm, and 160.9ppm for the carbons of pyran
ring (C-O-C), and 120.3ppm due to CN. The carbon attached to OH in
aromatic ring appeared at 156.4ppm while, the other aromatic carbons
appeared at 134.5-115.4ppm. Carbons of CH2, and CH3 groups appeared
at 35.1, 50.5, and 27.2ppm respectively[198].
152
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NC NH2
HO O
CH3
H3C
153
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
9.258
7.002
6.980
6.946
6.925
6.676
6.655
4.071
3.371
2.544
2.500
2.486
2.442
2.266
2.225
2.117
2.077
1.037
0.999
0.984
0.952
NAME antep Z10
EXPNO 1
PROCNO 1
Date_ 20130225
Time 16.59
INSTRUM spect
PROBHD 5 mm DUL 13C-1
PULPROG zg
TD 65536
SOLVENT DMSO
NS 4
DS 0
SWH 8223.685 Hz
FIDRES 0.125483 Hz
AQ 3.9846387 sec
RG 45.2
DW 60.800 usec
DE 6.00 usec
antep Z10
TE 300.0 K
D1 1.00000000 sec
TD0 1
======== CHANNEL f1 ========
NUC1 1H
P1 10.00 usec
PL1 -3.11 dB
PL1W 19.12242317 W
SFO1 400.1324710 MHz
SI 32768
SF 400.1300000 MHz
WDW EM
SSB 0
LB 0.30 Hz
GB 0
PC 1.00
0.52
1.94
1.00
0.53
0.69
1.19
0.63
0.63
1.59
0.48
1.45
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ppm
154
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
196.13
164.37
162.46
160.99
158.85
156.45
135.64
134.35
129.62
128.62
123.27
120.36
117.10
115.46
114.66
113.65
102.89
59.23
50.50
40.59
40.38
40.18
39.97
39.76
39.55
39.34
35.17
32.25
28.89
28.41
27.23
NAME antep Z10
EXPNO 2
PROCNO 1
Date_ 20130225
Time 17.02
INSTRUM spect
PROBHD 5 mm DUL 13C-1
PULPROG zgpg30
TD 65536
SOLVENT DMSO
NS 611
antep Z10
DS 4
SWH 24038.461 Hz
FIDRES 0.366798 Hz
AQ 1.3631988 sec
RG 1030
DW 20.800 usec
DE 6.50 usec
TE 300.0 K
D1 2.00000000 sec
D11 0.03000000 sec
TD0 1
155
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٥٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٥۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
HN
HN N
OH O
CH3
H3C
۱٥۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
The 1H- NMR spectrum (figure 3. 52) showed the singlet signals
at δ9.3 and δ8.8 were assigned for OH and CH pyrmidone protons
respectively. Aromatic protons appeared as multiplet at δ7.3- δ6.6 , while
the two protons of NH2 appeared as singlet at δ6.9. The protons of CH
pyran ring, CH2 and CH3 protons appeared as singlet at δ4.6, δ2.1- 2.2,
and δ0.9-1.1 respectively.
۱٥۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٦۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٦۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
H
N 3031.9 2190.0 1683.2 846 n N-H
A22
1643 3182
Me
3072 2190.8 1679.8 815.8
A23 N -
1649
Me
۱٦۲
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
In the 1H- NMR spectrum (figure 3.59) two signals for OH and CH
of imine as a singlet at δ9.67 and δ9.2, respectively. Aromatic protons
appeared as multiplet at δ7.7- δ6.6. The signal at δ4.06 was assigned to
pyran proton, while six protons of –N(CH3)2 appeared as singlet at δ3.09.
The CH2 and CH3 protons appeared as singlet at δ2.1- 2.2, and δ0.9-1.1
respectively.
13
CNMR spectrum (figure 3.60) showed signals at 196.5 for C=O,
188.3 ppm for C=N imine, while the C-OH and C-N(CH3)2 appeared at
155 ppm, and i54.1. Carbons of pyran ring (C-O-C) appeared at 158 and
164.5 ppm. The aromatic carbons appeared at 135 -113.1ppm. A signal at
58.7ppm was attributed to carbon attached to the nitrile group, while
carbon of nitrile appeared at 119.8 [183].
۱٦۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٦٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٦٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٦٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٦۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٦۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱٦۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۷۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
The results showed that all the blends A17-A23 have higher
oxidation stability compared with the base oil (blank), while the blends
A20, A21, and A23 have highest oxidation stability than the blend with
standard antioxidant.
۱۷۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Characterization Blank A17 A18 A19 A20 A21 A23 A25 Standard
Volatile acidity 0.0025 0.0120 0.0046 0.0040 0.0060 0.0049 0.0093 0.0060 0.006
(mg KOH/g oil)
Soluble acidity 0.2571 0.1250 0.2327 0.130 0.1210 0.0123 0.3490 0.1220 0.1230
(mg KOH/g oil)
Total acidity 0.2596 0.1370 0.2373 0.134 0.1270 0.0172 0.3583 0.1280 0.1290
(mg KOH/g oil)
Total sludge 0.280 0.3188 0.1324 0.1664 0.0330 0.0989 0.0204 0.5436 0.0880
(wt,%)
Total oxidation 0.3630 0.3627 0.2084 0.2093 0.1292 0.1044 0.1170 0.5846 0.1298
product (TOP,%)
۱۷۲
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Blank A17 A18 A19 A20 A21 A23 A25 Standard
Total sludge (wt%) Total oxidation product (TOP%) Total acidity (mg KOH/g oil)
۱۷۳
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۷٤
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
The 1H- NMR spectrum (figure 3. 63) showed the singlet signals at
δ11.99 and δ9.26 were assigned for NH and OH protons respectively.
Aromatic protons appeared as multiplet at δ7.9- δ6.5, while the two
protons of NH2 appeared as singlet at δ6.98. The proton of CH pyran
ring appeared as singlet at δ4.1.
13
CNMR spectrum (figure 3.64) showed signals at 165 for C=O,
while the C-OH appeared at 156ppm. Carbons of pyran ring (C-O-C)
appeared at 158 and 160ppm. The aromatic carbons appeared at 135 -
113.1ppm. A signal at 53ppm was attributed to carbon attached to the
nitrile group, while carbon of nitrile appeared at 118.6 [198].
۱۷٥
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NC NH2
HO O
O N H
H O
۱۷٦
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NC NH2
HO O
O N H
H O
۱۷۷
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
NC NH2
HO O
O N H
H O
۱۷۸
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
The results are tabulated in Table 3.21, It was found from Table
3.21 and Figure 3.65 that the blends B1, B2, and B3 have higher
oxidation stability compared with the base oil (blank) and the blend with
the standard antioxidant.
The blend B1 with 0.7 wt% of A26 gave the higher oxidation
stability than B2and B3. So, the recommended percentage of this additive
A26 is 0.7 wt%, which is more lower than the percentage of standard
additive.
۱۷۹
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Blank B1 B2 B3 Standard
B1, B2 and B3
۱۸۰
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
Conclusion
5. The pour point of oil blends with 2 and 3.5 wt.% D5, and D7 was
investigated. All these additives depressed the oil pour point from
-6 οC to -15 οC.
۱۸۱
Chapter Three : Result & Discussion
۱۸۲
Kinematic viscosity measurement apparatus (ASTM-D 445)
183
Pour point measurement apparatus (ASTM-D 97)
184
Oxidation stability apparatus (IP 280)
185
References
References
۱۸٦
References
11) Deane, W. and Davis, H. B., Chem. metall. Eng. 36, 1929, p. 618.
۱۸۷
References
Amsterdam, 2003.
26) Hui, F.; Machtalere, G.; Xie, J.; Kolodziejczyk, H. and Rosset, R.,
Anal. Chim. Acta, 339, 1997, p. 109.
۱۸۸
References
27) Jacop, E.; Malcom, W.; Dean, L.R., EP patent 0307132B1, 1991,
(Exxon chemical).
29) Barnes, A.M.; Bartle, K.D. and Thibon, V.R.A., Tribol. Int., 34,
2001, p. 389.
30) Lin, Y.C. and So, H., Tribol. Int., 37, 2004, p. 25.
33) Pranab, G.; Tapan, D. and Moumita, D., Res. J. Chem. Sci., 1, 2011.
34) Jukic´, A.; Rogosˇic´, M. and Janovic, Z., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
46, 2007, p. 3321.
35) Wu, M.M.; Chu, A.S., US patent 5276277, 1994, (Mobil Oil
Corporation).
37) Carvalho, M.J.; Seidl, P.R.; Belchior, C.R. and Sodre, J.R., Tribol.
Int., 43, 2010, p. 2298.
۱۸۹
References
38) Liesen, G. P.; Jao, T. C. and Shoutian, L., EP 1 086 964 B2, 2011.
39) Peer, W. J. and Scanlon, E., US Patent 8143202 B2, 2012, (Ciba
Corp).
46) Mansot, J. L.; Hallouis, M. and Martin, J. M., Colloid Surface A., 75,
1993, p. 25.
۱۹۰
References
53) Markovic, I. and Ottewillm, R. H., Colloid Polym. Sci., 264, 1986,
p.454.
54) Sabol, A. R.; Blaha, E.W. and Brannen, C. G., US Patent 3609076,
1971, (Standard Oil Company).
55) Arnold, J. D.; Fair, H. J., Fair, L. V. and Berry, J. D., US Patent
4225446, 1980, (Calumet Industries, Inc.).
۱۹۱
References
60) Ma, Q.; Migdal, C. A.; Schlup, K. A.; Diflavio, J-L. and Muir, R. J.,
EP 2593537 Al, 2013 (Chemture Corporation).
68) Wang, Y.; Eli, W.; Liu, Y. and Long, L., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47,
2008, p.8561.
69) Wang, Y., Eli, W., Nueraimaiti, A., and Liu, Y., Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 48, 2009, p.37.
۱۹۲
References
70) Wang, Y. and Eli, W., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 2010, p.2589.
71) Wang, Y. and Eli, W., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 2010, p.8902.
72) Wang, Y.; Eli, W.; Zhang, L. and Cai, G., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50,
2011, p.1530.
73) Hammond, S.; Price, M. A. and Skinner, P., Patent US 0183212 A1,
2002.
74) Hendrikus, C.; Boons, M.; Spala, E. and Dam, W. V., US Patent
0235686 A1, 2004.
75) Hendrikus, C.; Boons, M.; Spala, E. and Dam, W. V., US Patent
7163911 B2, 2007, (Chevron Oronite Company).
76) R.M. Motier and S.T. Orszulik, " Chemistry and Technology of
Lubricants", Blackie Academic & Professional, London, 1997.
77) Sharma, B.K.; Perez, J.M. and Erhan, S.Z., Energy & Fuels, 21, 2007,
p. 2408.
۱۹۳
References
81) Hamblin, P.C. and Robrbach, P., Lubrication Science, 14(1), 2001,
p.3.
84) Adams,P.E. and Wolak, T.J., US Patent 6 787 663 B2, 2004, (The
Lubrizol Corporation).
85) Denis, R.A.; Kocsis, J.A.; Roski, J.P.; Carrick, V.A., EP 1274821B1,
2006 (The Lubrizol Corporation).
86) Rios, M.A.; Santiago, S.N.; Lopes, A.A and Mazetto, S.E., Energy &
Fuels, 24, 2010, p.3285.
88) Gatto, V.J.; Schneller, E.R. and Moehle, W.E., US Patent 0286004,
2010 (Albemarle Corporation).
۱۹٤
References
95) Kurek, R.P. and Holmgren, J.S., US Patent 5214211, 1993 (UOP).
96) Lai, J.T. and Filla, D.S., US Patent 5672752, 1997, (B.F. Goodrich
Company).
97) Lai, J.T., US Patent 6204412 , 2001, (The B.F. Goodrich Company).
98) Lai, T.J., US Patent 6426324, 2002, (Noveon IP Holdings Corp. and
BP Exploration & Oil Inc.).
۱۹٥
References
101) Aebil, B. M.; Evans, S. and Gati, S., US Patent 6315925 B1, 2001,
(Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation).
104) Popoff, I.C.; P.G. Haines, and Inman, C.E., US Patent 2943112,
1960, (Pennsalt Chemicals Corporation).
105) Lai, J.T., US Patent 5489711, 1996, (The B.F. Goodrich Company).
106) Lai, J.T. and Filla, D.S., US Patent 5750787, 1998, (The B.F.
Goodrich Company).
109) Dong, J. and Migdal, C.A., U.S. Patent 069000 A1, 2006 (Crompton
Corporation).
۱۹٦
References
113) Salomon, M.F. U.S. Patent 4,764,299 (August 16, 1988, The
Lubrizol Corporation).
115) Amer, F.A.; Hassan, H.M.; Moawad, E.B. and Shaker, N., Advances
in Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1(1), 2011, p.40.
119) Kokura, S.; Yoshida, N.; Sakamoto, N.; Ishikawa, T.; Takagi, T.;
Higashihara, H.; Nakabe, N.; Handa, O.; Naito, Y. & Yoshikawa, T.
Cancer Lett., 229, 2005, p.223–233.
۱۹۷
References
121) Belmar, J.; Alderete, J.; Zuñiga, C.; Jiménez, C. Jiménez, V.;
Núñez,H.; Grandy,R. and Yori, A., Bol. Soc. Chil. Quím., 46, 2001,
123) Yu, S.-M.; Kuo, S.-C.; Huang, L.-J.; Sun, S. S.-M.; Huang, T.-F.
and Teng, C.-M., J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 44, 1992, p. 667.
124) Catarzi, D.; Cecchi, L.; Colotta, V.; Filacchioni, G.;Martini, C.;
Tacchi, P. and Lucacchini, A., J. Med. Chem. 38, 1995, p. 1330.
125) Hogale, M. B. and Pawar, B. N., J. Indian Chem. Soc. 66, 1989, p.
206.
128) Kuo, S.-C.; Huang, L.-J. and Nakamura, H., J. Med. Chem.,
27,1984, p. 539.
129) Vaid, R. K.; Dhindsa, G. S.; Kaushik, B.; Singh, S. P. and Dhawan,
S. N., Indian J. Chem. Sect., B 25, 1986, p. 569.
130) Ismail, Z. H.; Aly, G. M.; El-Degwi, M. S.; Heiba, H. I. and Ghorab,
M. M., Egypt. J. Biotech., 13, 2003, p. 73.
131) Joshi, K. C.; Jain, R. and Arora, S., J. Indian Chem. Soc., 65, 1988,
p. 277.
۱۹۸
References
132) Lehmann, F.; Holm, M. and Laufer, S. J., Comb. Chem., 10, 2008,
p.364.
133) Junek, H. and Aigner, H., Chem. Ber., 106, 1973, p. 914.
135) Otto, H. H. and Schmelz, H., Arch. Pharm., 312, 1979, p. 478.
137) Peng, Y.; Song, G. and Dou, R., Green Chem., 8, 2006, p. 573.
138) Elkholy, A.; Al-Qalaf, F. and Elnagdi, M. H., Arkivoc, xiv, 2008,
p.124.
142) Guo, S-B.; Wang, S-X. and Li, J., Synth. Commun., 37, 2007, p.
2111.
143) Shi, D., Mou, J., Zhuang, Q., Niu, L., Wu, N., and Wang, X.,
Synthetic Commu., 34, 2004, p. 4557.
144) Jin, T-S., Zhao R-Q., and Li, T-S., Arkivoc, x, 2006, p. 176.
۱۹۹
References
145) Al-Matar, H., Khalil, K., Adam, A., and Elnagdi , M., Molecules,
15, 2010, p. 6619.
148) Nasseri, M.A. and Sadeghzadeh, S.M., Monatsh Chem., 144, 2013,
p. 1551.
149) Willem, A.L; Lindani, N.E.; Samuel, K.; Garreth, L.M. Simon,
S.M. and Charles, B.K., Tetrahedron, 61, 2005, p. 9996.
150) Curini M.; Cravotto G.; Epifano F. and Giannone G., Curr. Med.
Chem., 13, 2006, p. 199.
151) Qiao, R.; Woon-Yew, S.; Zhiyun, D.; Kun, Z. and Jian, W., Chem.
Eur. J., 17, 2011, p.7781.
152) Bita, B.; Majid, M.H.; Hossein, A.O., J. Kor. Chem. Soc., 52, 2009,
p.631.
153) Tangmouo, J.G.; Meli, A.L.; Komguem, J.; Kuete, V.; Ngounou,
F.N.; Lontsi, D.; Beng, V.P.; Choudhary, M.I. and Sondengam, B.L.,
Tetrahedron Lett., 47, 2006, p.3067.
154) Kitamura, R.O.S.; Romoff, P.; Young, M.C.M.; Kato, M.J. and
Lago, J.H.G., Phytochemistry, 67, 2006, p.2398.
155) Abdelrazek, F.M.; Metz, P.; Kataeva, O.; Jäger, A. and El-
Mahrouky, S.F., Archiv der Pharmazie, 340, 2007, p.543.
۲۰۰
References
156) Milan, M.; Mirjana, M.; Desanka, B.; Sanja, M.; Neda, N. and
Vladimir, M., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 12, 2011, p.2822.
161) Eiden, F. and Denk, F., Arch. Pharm., 324, 1991, p. 353.
162) Kemnitzer, W.; Drewe,. J.; Songchun, J.; Hong, Z.; Yan, W.;
Jianghong, Z.; Shaojuan, J.; Herich, J.; Labreque, D.; Storer, R.;
Meerovitch, K.; Bouffard, D.; Rabindra, R.; Denis, R.; Blais, C.; Serge,
L.; Attardo, G.; Gourdeau, H.; Tseng, B.; Kasibhatla, S.; and Cai, S. X.,
J. Med. Chem., 47(25), 2004, 47, p. 6299.
163) Singh, K.; Singh, J. and Singh, H., Tetrahedron, 52, 1996, p. 14273.
164) Tu, S. J.; Miao, C. B.; Gao, Y.; Feng, Y. J. and Feng, J. G., Chin. J.
Chem., 20, 2002, p.703.
165) Li, J. T.; Xu, W. Z.; Yang, L. C. and Li, T. S., Synth. Commun., 34,
2004, p.4565.
167) Chen, L.; Li, Y. Q.; Huang, X. J. and Zheng, W., J. Heteroat.
Chem., 20, 2009, p.91.
169) Babu, N. S.; Pasha, N.; Rao, K. T. V.; Prasad, P. S. S. and Lingalah,
N., Tetrahedron Lett., 49, 2008, p.2730.
171) Zhang, G.; Zhang ,Y.; Yan, J.; Chen, R.; Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; and
Wang, R., J. Org. Chem., 77, 2012, p.878.
172) Jin, T-S.; Wang, A-Q.; Shi, F.; Han, L-S.; Liu, L-B.; and Li, T-S.
Arkivoc xiv, 2006, p.78.
173) Lian, X-Z.; Huang, Y.; Li, Y-Q.; and Zheng, W-J., Monatshefte fur
Chemie, 139, 2008, p.129.
176) Nasseri, M.A. and Sadeghzadeh, S.M., Monatsh Chem, 144, 2013,
p.1551.
177) Rostamnia, S.; Nuri, A.; Xin, H.; Pourjavadi, A.; Hosseini, S. H.,
Tetrahedron Lett., 54, 2013, p.3344.
۲۰۲
References
179) Furniss, B.S., Hannford, A.J., Smith, P.W.G. and Tatchell, A.R.,
"Vogel,s, Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry", Fifth Edition,
Longman Scientific & Technical, UK, 1989.
180) Hudson, L.K., Eastoe, J., and Dowding, P.J., Advances in Colloid
and Interface Science, 123, 2006, p. 425.
182) Lu, Y., and Miller, J.D., Spectroscopy Journal of Colloid and
Interface Science,256,1 , 2002, p.41.
۲۰۳
References
196) Prakash, C.R., Raja, S., Saravanan, G., Dinesh Kumar, P. and
Panneer Selvam,T., Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci.,1(4), 2011, p.140.
۲۰٤
References
199) Ziarani, G.M. ; Faramarzi, S.; Asadi, S.; Badiei, A.; Bazl, R. and
Amanlou, M., Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 21(3), 2013, p.1.
200) Gupta, R.; Jain, A.; Joshi, R. and Jain, M., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.,
32 (3), 2011, p. 899.
۲۰٥
ﺍﻟﺨﻼﺻﺔ
ﺗﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺗﺤﻀﻴﺮ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺤﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﻟﺰﻳﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻳﻴﺖ ﻭﺗﻢ
ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺤﺴﻦ ﻟﻤﺆﺷﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﺰﻭﺟﺔ ﻭﻣﺨﻔﺾ ﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﻜﺎﺏ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﺸﺘﻘﺎﺕ pyranopyrazoleﻭ pyranopyrimidineﻛﻤﻀﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻟﻸﻛﺴﺪﺓ.
ﺗﻢ ﺗﺤﻀﻴﺮ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻨﺴﻴﻮﻡ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﻣﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻤﻴﺔ ) (D7-D1ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻤﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻭﻛﺴﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻨﺴﻴﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻏﺎﺯ ﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻭﻛﺴﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ 60ﻣﺌﻮﻳﺔ ،
ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻻﻣﻮﻧﻴﺎ ﻛﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﻣﺰﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻮﻳﻦ – ﺍﻳﺜﺎﻧﻮﻝ ﻛﻤﺬﻳﺐ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺣﺠﻤﻴﻪ ) .(1:9ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻣﻨﻈﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻳﺔ ﻟﻤﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻟﺴﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﺸﺘﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﻣﺾ palmiticﻭ
stearicﻭ oleicﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻭﻛﺴﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻟﺴﻴﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻫﻴﺪﺭﻭﻛﺴﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻟﺴﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﺪﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻭﻛﺴﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻨﺴﻴﻮﻡ.
ﺷﺨﺼﺖ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻀﺮﺓ ﺑﻮﺳﺎﻁﺔ ﻣﻄﻴﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺔ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻔﺴﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ
ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻨﺎﻁﻴﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﺒﺮﻭﺗﻮﻥ .ﻭﺗﻢ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻢ ﻛﻔﺎءﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻔﺎﺕ ﺑﻤﺰﺝ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻀﺎﻑ ﺑﺘﺮﺍﻛﻴﺰ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺯﻳﺖ
ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻳﻴﺖ ﻧﻮﻉ ) (60 stockﺍﻟﻤﺠﻬﺰ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﺼﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻗﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ).(TBN
ﻋﻮﻟﺠﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻹﺣﺼﺎﺋﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻐﻴﺮﺍﺕ ) (ANOVAﻭ
ﻗﺪ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺫﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺍﻣﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺤﻀﻴﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻔﺎﺕ
) (D7-D1ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺍ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ ) (1-5%ﻟﻪ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱ .
ﺃﻅﻬﺮ ﻣﺰﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻀﺮ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ 2%ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻔﻲ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻳﺔ ﻟﻤﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻨﺴﻴﻮﻡ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﻣﻀﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻤﻴﻴﻦ ) (palmitic , stearicﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭﻳﺔ ﺗﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﻛﺴﺪﺓ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺰﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺷﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﺼﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ.
ﺗﻢ ﻣﻔﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ A1ﻭ A17ﻣﻊ ﺣﺎﻣﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺭﻣﻴﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻮﺭﻣﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺛﺎﻳﻮ ﺳﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻣﻮﻧﻴﻮﻡ
ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﺷﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻳﻜﺮﻭﻭﻳﻒ ﻟﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺎﺕ A2ﻭ A3ﻭ A4ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ A18ﻭ A19ﻭ A20ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ.
ﺷﺨﺼﺖ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻀﺮﺓ ﺑﻮﺳﺎﻁﺔ ﻣﻄﻴﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺔ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﺤﻤﺮﺍء ﻭﻗﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻤﻄﻴﺎﻓﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﺮﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻨﺎﻁﻴﺴﻲ ﻟﻠﺒﺮﻭﺗﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺑﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻢ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﻀﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻟﻸﻛﺴﺪﺓ ﺑﺨﻠﻂ %۱ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ
ﻣﺮﻛﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺯﻳﺖ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ 60 stockﺍﻟﻤﺠﻬﺰ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﺼﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ.
ﺗﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﺴﺪﺓ ﻟﻤﺰﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻀﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ IP280
.ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻴﻨﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺇﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻀﺮﺓ ﺃﻅﻬﺮﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭﻳﺔ ﺃﻛﺴﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻟﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺎﺕ A4ﻭ A5ﻭ A7ﻭ A20ﻭ A21ﻭ A23ﻭ A26ﺃﻅﻬﺮﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭﻳﺔ ﺃﻛﺴﺪﺓ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻬﺰﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﺼﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ.
ئﻙﺎﺡتئﻙﻊﻛ ﻠﻰ
بئﻙﺔﻊﻛﻱﻝئﻙﻊﺌﻙﻰ ه
ئذ
هر
ﺝﺌ ﻠﻊ ﺒ ﺎﻎخئخ – ﻘﻛﻱ ﺒئﻙﻊﻛهﻝ
ﻔ ﺯﻝئﻙﻘﻱ ﻠﻱﺌ ؟
ﺃﻁﺮﻭﺣﺔ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ -ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ
ﻛﺠﺰء ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺩﻛﺘﻮﺭﺍﻩ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻴﺎ ء ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺑﺈ ﺷﺮﺍﻑ
۱٤۳٤ﻫـ ۲۰۱۳ﻡ