Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Victorina acquired a right all conjugal rights, and in In the present case the action for the support or alimony is
particular to the allowance of alimony pendente lite." And brought by a woman who alleges that she is a wife; therefore
upon this supposition he cited articles of the Civil Code as to it is necessary for her to prove possession of the civil status
rights enjoyed by a married woman by virtue of the of a spouse — that is, a marriage, without which one has no
marriage, and those which she may further exercise by right to the title to husband or wife. Marriages celebrated
reason of divorce pending litigation and those granted to her before the adoption of the Civil Code must be proven by the
finally in case of a favorable judgment. means established by the former laws. This evidence being
lacking, and the civil status of marriage being in litigation, it
The respondents judge had jurisdiction to try the divorce is evident that nothing can be taken for granted upon the
case and its incidents, among others that of alimony; in an point in issue. There is no law or reason which authorizes the
interlocutory ruling he held that the alleged matrimony granting of alimony to a person who claims to be a spouse in
existed, although it appeared to him to be a matter not clear the same manner as to a person who conclusively establishes
or free from doubt; in another interlocutory order, by legal proof that he or she is such spouse, and sues for
notwithstanding the fact that the existence of the marriage is divorce or separation. In this case the legal evidence raises a
not clear or free from doubt, he directed the allowance of presumption of law; in the former there is no presumption,
alimony pendente lite in favor of the plaintiff; against this there is nothing but a mere allegation — a fact in issue —
interlocutory order no appeal lies on behalf of the alleged and a simple fact in issue must not be confounded with an
husband who is to pay this allowance; this alleged husband established right recognized by a final judgment or based
must pay it without any guaranty of recovery in the event upon a legal presumption.
that the proof should established a contrary condition of
affairs to that assumed to be correct, notwithstanding the On the issue of the remedy of prohibition, this remedy must
fact that the question is not clear or free from doubt; and as be based upon a lack of jurisdiction or an excess in the
the judge is not devoid of jurisdiction, and as no appeal lies exercise of jurisdiction in order that the judge may be
against an interlocutory order, that such an opinion, such an prohibited from continuing the proceedings.
interlocutory order so rendered, although erroneous and
causing irreparable damage, can not be reviewed by any The court below had jurisdiction to try the divorce suit, but
other court during the course of the trial. he was without jurisdiction to grant alimony when the right
to claim alimony had not accrued in accordance with the
Under article 1591 of the old Code any person believing provisions of the Civil Code. This Code only grants the rights
himself entitled to that provisional alimony or support was to alimony to a wife. This status not appearing by a final
required to file with the complaint documents proving judgment, the court is without jurisdiction to make any order
conclusively the title by virtue of which the same was sued in the matter. Therefore mandamus is the proper remedy
for. If the title was based upon a right created by law, it was upon the facts related.
necessary to present the documents establishing the bond of
relationship between the plaintiff and defendant or the It is not necessary to decide at this time if an exception could
circumstances which gave a right to the alimony, such be made with respect to a case in which the fact of the
evidence to be completed by the testimony of witnesses if marriage is admitted of record by the defendant. In the case
necessary. The judge, under article 1592, could not admit the before us this fact was denied. The motion and demurrer are
complaint unless the documents referred to in the preceding overruled and the defendant is authorized to answer the
article were submitted. It is evident from this that under the complaint within twenty days from this date.
provisions of the law then in force a suit for alimony could
not prosper upon the mere opinion of the judge expressed, QUICK DIGEST:
not in a final judgment causing status, but in an interlocutory
order which has no other purpose than to facilitate the Victorina (V) filed a complaint against Yangco (Y) praying
continuance of the trial. that she be declared the lawful wife of said Yangco, and that
she be granted a divorce, an allowance for alimony, and
The necessity of founding the action for support or alimony attorney's fees during the pendency of the suit. In Y’s answer
on a title, and a title supported by documentary evidence, is a to the complaint, he denied the fact of marriage between him
consequence of the precepts of article 143 of the Civil Code and V. Support was granted by Judge Rohde (R).(Note: the
cited by the respondent judge himself. In this article the right
is insufficient still the ascendants are obliged to time respondents sued for support, Cheryl and Edward
support. exercised parental authority over their children,
[14]
petitioners submit that the obligation to support the
FACTS: latters offspring ends with them.
And the relevant provisions of the Family Code that Ma. Belen B. Mangonon filed, in behalf of her then minor
treat of the right to support are Articles 194, 195 & 196, thus: children Rica and Rina, a Petition for Declaration of
Particularly Article 195. Subject to the provisions of the Legitimacy and Support, with application for support
succeeding articles, the following are obliged to support each pendente lite. In said petition, it was alleged that on 16
other to the whole extent set forth in the preceding article: February 1975, petitioner and respondent Federico Delgado
xxxx 4. Parents and their illegitimate children and the were civilly married by then City Court Judge Eleuterio
legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter; and Agudo. At that time, petitioner was only 21 years old while
respondent Federico was only 19 years old. As the marriage
IN THE PRESENT CASE, Arhbencel’s demand for was solemnized without the required consent per Article 85
support, being based on her claim of filiation to petitioner as of the New Civil Code, it was annulled on 11 August 1975.
his illegitimate daughter, falls under Article 195(4). As such,
her entitlement to support from petitioner is dependent on Within seven months after the annulment of their marriage,
the determination of her filiation. petitioner gave birth to twins Rica and Rina. According to
petitioner, private respondents had totally abandoned them.
The handwritten note does not contain any At the time of the institution of the petition, Rica and Rina
statement whatsoever about Arhbencel’s filiation to were about to enter college in the (USA) where petitioner,
together with her daughters and second husband, had moved
Petitioner also alleged that Rica and Rina are her legitimate By and large, the status of the twins as children of Federico
daughters by respondent Federico since the twin sisters cannot be denied. As a matter of fact, respondent Francisco
were born within seven months from the date of the admitted having wrote several letters to Rica and Rina. In the
annulment of her marriage to respondent Federico. said letters, particularly at the bottom thereof, respondent
Francisco wrote the names of Rica and Rina Delgado. He
Petitioner also claimed that she was constrained to seek therefore was very well aware that they bear the surname
support pendente lite from private respondents - who are Delgado.
millionaires with extensive assets both here and abroad - in
view of the imminent opening of classes, the possibility of a Finally, as to the amount of support pendente lite, we take our
protracted litigation, and Rica and Rina’s lack of financial bearings from the provision of the law mandating the
means to pursue their college education in the USA. amount of support to be proportionate to the resources or
means of the giver and to the necessities of the recipient.
WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing considerations, Guided by this principle, we hold respondent Francisco liable
respondents are hereby directed to provide a monthly for half of the amount of school expenses incurred by Rica
support (pendente lite) of P5,000.00 each. and Rina as support pendente lite.Considering, however, that
the twin sisters may have already been done with their
Unsatisfied with the Order of the trial court, petitioner education by the time of the promulgation of this decision,
brought the case to the Court of Appeals via Petition for we deem it proper to award support pendente lite in arrears
Certiorari. The Court of Appeals affirmed the holding of the to be computed from the time they entered college until they
trial court. had finished their respective studies.
Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration was denied WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Petition is
PARTIALLY GRANTED.
ISSUE: whether or not Francisco is liable for support for her
granddaughter’s education? • ROXAS V. COURT OF APPEALS, G.R. NO. 139337, 15
AUGUST 2001 BELLEZA
YES.
Principle:
SEC. 4. Order.- The court shall determine provisionally the
pertinent facts, and shall render such orders as justice and The proceedings and orders issued by trial court judge
equity may require, having due regard to the probable in the application for support pendente lite in the re-filed
outcome of the case and such other circumstances as may aid case, were not rendered null and void by the omission of
in the proper resolution of the question involved. If the a statement in the certificate of non-forum shopping
application is granted, the court shall fix the amount of regarding the prior filing and dismissal without
money to be provisionally paid or such other forms of prejudice.
support as should be provided, taking into account the
necessities of the applicant and the resources or means of Facts:
the adverse party, and the terms of payment or mode for
providing the support. If the application is denied, the Carminia Roxas (Carminia) filed before RTC-Paranñ aque a
principal case shall be tried and decided as early as possible. declaration of nullity of marriage on the ground of
psychological in capacity with an application for support
Under this provision, a court may temporarily grant support pendente lite for their four (4) minor children against her
pendente lite prior to the rendition of judgment or final husband Jose Antonio Roxas (Jose). Said case was raffled to
order. Because of its provisional nature, a court does not
RTC257 (Judge How). However, prior to service to
need to delve fully into the merits of the case before it can
respondent and before the latter could file a responsive
• LUA V. LUA, G.R. NOS. 175279-80, 5 JUNE 2013 In its May 13, 2004 Order, the trial court stated that the
DESCALLAR March 31, 2004 Order had become final and executory since
respondent’s motion for reconsideration is treated as a mere
PRINCIPLE: scrap of paper for violation of the three day notice period
As a matter of law, the amount of support which under Section 4, Rule 15 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure,
those related by marriage and family relationship is as amended, and therefore did not interrupt the running of
generally obliged to give each other shall be in proportion to the period to appeal.
the resources or means of the giver and to the needs of the
recipient. Such support comprises everything indispensable His second motion for reconsideration having been denied,
for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance, respondent filed a petition for certiorari in the CA.
education and transportation, in keeping with the financial
capacity of the family. COURT OF APPEALS RULING (1ST)
On April 12, 2005, the CA rendered its Decision,9 finding
In determining the amount of provisional support, merit in respondent’s contention that the trial court gravely
the court may likewise consider the following factors: (1) the abused its discretion in granting P250,000.00 monthly
financial resources of the custodial and non-custodial parent support to petitioner without evidence to prove his actual
and those of the child; (2) the physical and emotional health income. The said court thus decreed:
of the child and his or her special needs and aptitudes; (3)
the standard of living the child has been accustomed to; (4) a) to pay private respondent a monthly support pendente lite
the non-monetary contributions that the parents will make of P115,000.00 beginning the month of April 2005 and every
toward the care and well-being of the child. month thereafter within the first five (5) days thereof;
The general rule is to the effect that when a father is b) to pay the private respondent the amount of P115,000.00
required by a divorce decree to pay to the mother money for a month multiplied by the number of months starting from
the support of their dependent children and the unpaid and September 2003 until March 2005 less than the amount
accrued installments become judgments in her favor, he supposedly given by petitioner to the private respondent as
cannot, as a matter of law, claim credit on account of her and their two (2) children monthly support; and
payments voluntarily made directly to the children. However,
special considerations of an equitable nature may justify a c) to pay the costs.
court in crediting such payments on his indebtedness to the
mother, when that can be done without injustice to her. Neither of the parties appealed this decision of the CA. In a
Compliance11 dated June 28, 2005, respondent attached a
FACTS: copy of a check he issued in the amount of P162,651.90
On September 3, 2003,3 petitioner Susan Lim-Lua filed an payable to petitioner. Respondent explained that, as decreed
action for the declaration of nullity of her marriage with in the CA decision, he deducted from the amount of support
respondent Danilo Y. Lua, docketed as Civil Case No. CEB- in arrears (September 3, 2003 to March 2005) ordered by
29346 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Cebu City, Branch the CA -- P2,185,000.00 -- plus P460,000.00 (April, May, June
14. and July 2005), totalingP2,645,000.00, the advances given by
him to his children and petitioner in the sum of
In her prayer for support pendente lite for herself and her P2,482,348.16.
two children, petitioner sought the amount of P500,000.00
as monthly support, citing respondent’s huge earnings from In her Comment to Compliance with Motion for Issuance of a
salaries and dividends in several companies and businesses Writ of Execution,12 petitioner asserted that none of the
here and abroad.4 expenses deducted by respondent may be chargeable as part
After due hearing, Judge Raphael B. Yrastorza, Sr. issued an of the monthly support contemplated by the CA in CA-G.R. SP
Order5 dated March 31, 2004 granting support pendente lite. No. 84740.
Respondent filed a motion for reconsideration,7 asserting On September 27, 2005, the trial court issued an Order13
that petitioner is not entitled to spousal support considering granting petitioner’s motion for issuance of a writ of
that she does not maintain for herself a separate dwelling execution as it rejected respondent’s interpretation of the CA
from their children and respondent has continued to support decision. Respondent filed a motion for reconsideration and
As a matter of law, the amount of support which those Controversy between the parties resurfaced when
related by marriage and family relationship is generally respondent’s compliance with the final CA decision indicated
After the trial court disallowed the foregoing deductions, Subject to the sound discretion of the court, either parent or
respondent filed a motion for reconsideration further both may be ordered to give an amount necessary for the
asserting amounts with supporting receipts be considered as support, maintenance, and education of the child. It shall be
additional advances given to petitioner and the children. in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to
the necessities of the recipient.
The CA, in ruling for the respondent said that all the
foregoing expenses already incurred by the respondent In determining the amount of provisional support, the court
should, in equity, be considered advances which may be may likewise consider the following factors: (1) the financial
properly deducted from the support in arrears due to the resources of the custodial and non-custodial parent and
petitioner and the two children. Said court also noted the those of the child; (2) the physical and emotional health of
absence of petitioner’s contribution to the joint obligation of the child and his or her special needs and aptitudes; (3) the
support for their children. standard of living the child has been accustomed to; (4) the
non-monetary contributions that the parents will make
We reverse in part the decision of the CA. toward the care and well-being of the child.
Judicial determination of support pendente lite in cases of
legal separation and petitions for declaration of nullity or The Family Court may direct the deduction of the provisional
annulment of marriage are guided by the following support from the salary of the parent.
provisions of the Rule on Provisional Orders24
Sec. 2. Spousal Support.–In determining support for the Since the amount of monthly support pendente lite as fixed
spouses, the court may be guided by the following rules: by the CA was not appealed by either party, there is no
controversy as to its sufficiency and reasonableness. The
(a) In the absence of adequate provisions in a written dispute concerns the deductions made by respondent in
agreement between the spouses, the spouses may be settling the support in arrears.
supported from the properties of the absolute community or The general rule is to the effect that when a father is required
the conjugal partnership. by a divorce decree to pay to the mother money for the
support of their dependent children and the unpaid and
(b) The court may award support to either spouse in such accrued installments become judgments in her favor, he
amount and for such period of time as the court may deem cannot, as a matter of law, claim credit on account of
just and reasonable based on their standard of living during payments voluntarily made directly to the children. However,
the marriage. special considerations of an equitable nature may justify a
court in crediting such payments on his indebtedness to the
(c) The court may likewise consider the following factors: (1) mother, when that can be done without injustice to her. The
whether the spouse seeking support is the custodian of a courts are justifiably reluctant to lay down any general rules
child whose circumstances make it appropriate for that as to when such credits may be allowed.
spouse not to seek outside employment; (2) the time
necessary to acquire sufficient education and training to Here, the CA should not have allowed all the expenses
enable the spouse seeking support to find appropriate incurred by respondent to be credited against the accrued
employment, and that spouse’s future earning capacity; (3) support pendente lite. As earlier mentioned, the monthly
the duration of the marriage; (4) the comparative financial support pendente lite granted by the trial court was intended
resources of the spouses, including their comparative primarily for food, household expenses such as salaries of
earning abilities in the labor market; (5) the needs and drivers and house helpers, and also petitioner’s scoliosis
obligations of each spouse; (6) the contribution of each therapy sessions. Hence, the value of two expensive cars
spouse to the marriage, including services rendered in home- bought by respondent for his children plus their
making, child care, education, and career building of the maintenance cost, travel expenses of petitioner and Angelli,
other spouse; (7) the age and health of the spouses; (8) the purchases through credit card of items other than groceries
physical and emotional conditions of the spouses; (9) the and dry goods (clothing) should have been disallowed, as
ability of the supporting spouse to give support, taking into these bear no relation to the judgment awarding support
account that spouse’s earning capacity, earned and unearned pendente lite. While it is true that the dispositive portion of
the executory decision in CA-G.R. SP No. 84740 ordered
On appeal, while the Decision in CA-G.R. SP No. 84740 Respondent complains that petitioner is very much
reduced the amount of monthly support fixed by the trial capacitated to generate income on her own because she
court, it nevertheless held that considering respondent’s presently maintains a boutique at the Ayala Center Mall in
financial resources, it is but fair and just that he give a Cebu City and at the same time engages in the business of
monthly support for the sustenance and basic necessities of lending money. He also claims that the two children have
petitioner and his children. This would imply that any finished their education and are now employed in the family
amount respondent seeks to be credited as monthly support business earning their own salaries.
should only cover those incurred for sustenance and
household expenses. Suffice it to state that the matter of increase or reduction of
support should be submitted to the trial court in which the
In the case at bar, records clearly show and in fact has been action for declaration for nullity of marriage was filed, as this
admitted by petitioner that aside from paying the expenses Court is not a trier of facts. The amount of support may be
of their two (2) children’s schooling, he gave his two (2) reduced or increased proportionately according to the
children two (2) cars and credit cards of which the expenses reduction or increase of the necessities of the recipient and
for various items namely: clothes, grocery items and repairs the resources or means of the person obliged to support.34
of their cars were chargeable to him which totaled an As we held in Advincula v. Advincula35
amount of more than One Hundred Thousand (P100,000.00)
for each of them and considering that as testified by the …Judgment for support does not become final. The right to
private respondent that she needs the total amount of support is of such nature that its allowance is essentially
P113,000.00 for the maintenance of the household and other provisional; for during the entire period that a needy party is
miscellaneous expenses and considering further that entitled to support, his or her alimony may be modified or
petitioner can afford to buy cars for his two (2) children, and altered, in accordance with his increased or decreased needs,
to pay the expenses incurred by them which are chargeable and with the means of the giver. It cannot be regarded as
to him through the credit cards he provided them in the subject to final determination.36
amount of P100,000.00 each, it is but fair and just that the
monthly support pendente lite for his wife, herein private QUICK DIGEST:
respondent, be fixed as of the present in the amount of Susan Lim-Lua, petitioner v. Danilo Y. Lua, respondent
P115,000.00 which would be sufficient enough to take care G.R. No. 175279-80, June 5, 2013
of the household and other needs. This monthly support
pendente lite to private respondent in the amount of Facts:
P115,000.00 excludes the amount of One Hundred ThirtyFive
(P135,000.00) Thousand Pesos for medical attendance
RULING: