Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
S. Marsili-Libellil
System Science Group, Technical University of Florence,
Via S. Marta 3, 50139 Ft'renze, Italy
511
512 S. Marsili-Libelli
(17)
-2.3347 -0.0155 0
A 13 .983 -0. 3212 0 (8 )
-3 with Q = identity matrixof appropriate dimen-
-0.41 84 -7.86 x10 -2.954
sions. If the system is both stabilizable and
detectable, the solution of eqs. (16-17)
Bu = col(O 0 1.52 x 10- 3) (9) converges to a non-negative-definite sequence
of matrices P as T~ for any terminal condi-
tion PT~O , thus yielding a steady-state con-
trol law in the form of eq. (15). The overall
OPTIMAL CONTROL ALGORITHM closed loop system is depicted in Fig. 2a
showing how the implementation of the control
An optimal control strategy should not only scheme implies the availability of the whole
take into account DO infLence on process per- state vector. Conversely, it would be desira-
formance, and therefore accuracy of control ble to synthetize the control signal availing
action, but should also consider the economic only of process output informations. Under
side, in this case represented by the energy the assumption of detectability, this can be
expenditure caused by the blowers. It is there done converting the state feedback control
fore advisable to associate a cost functional- scheme of Fig. 2a into the equivalent input-
to DO control scheme which allows a balance output representation from which to extract
between precision of control and related a dynamical output controller, as shown in
energy consuption. As to the control structure, Fig. 2b. The regulator transfer function is
regulator performance would benefit from the related to the overall transfer function GE
introduction of "integral state" feedback by the following
(Kwakernaak and Sivan, 1972) providing insensi
tivity to constant disturbances of the control
G (18)
led variable, e . g . biased sensors, and reduc-- regulator (l-G ) G
E process
ing sens~t~vity to parameter variations. This
latter feature is particularly appropriate
with G being in the form
since the design is based on a linear approxi- regulator
mation of the actual process dynamics, thus it -1 -n
a z + ... +anz
is important to select a control structure l
G (19)
which is least sensitive to possible departu- regulator -1 -n
l+blz + ... +bnz
re of system parameters from their nominal
design values, thus broadening the validity
-1 .
of the linear approximation. Let with z represent~ng the backward shift ope-
rator and
+ (10 )
n = l+degr. (Num.G, )+degr. (Den.G
" pro cess
)
(11)
exp(M) (20) R = I . a 1
n ' n
ACKNOWLEDGEHENT
',"'1")
\
I
I
I
.--......o---f---'.
-
I
L
,-
I
I
\
\
\
\
I I
I 2
L _ _____ ______ ____ ___ .--J
regulator
Fig. 2a. Solution of the LQI Fig. 4a. Input organic load
control problem. used in the simulation.
.11'111111
- ---- _1.1 IIrIIIII
- - cHlnI... IIrIIIII
't /
I
I
/
2 - " ,
\
"
,,
,, I
,
,
,
\
\,
:
Fig. 2b. Equivalent output \ I
:
\ I
dynamical re gulator. \
O -r---~-
0
•
-
-. - -
'2 16 20
- - ....... onlllo
5000
1_
O~O--'-----1~2--'~'--~
TIlE t_,)
~--2~'--2~~-~~~
Fi g . 3. Bl ock dia g ram structure Fig. 4c. Air f low input signal.
of CAD pa ckage .