Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv
Abstract
The cost of carbon substrates for microbial reduction of perchlorate (ClO4 ) is central to the success and competitiveness of a
sustainable bioremediation strategy for ClO4 . This study explored the potential application of starch in combination with an
amylolytic bacterial consortia and potato peel waste for ClO4 bioreduction. We obtained a potent amylolytic bacterial
consortium that consisted of a Citrobacter sp. S4, Streptomyces sp. S2, Flavobacterium sp. S6, Pseudoxanthomonas sp. S5,
Streptomyces sp. S7, and an Aeromonas sp. S8 identified by 16S rDNA sequencing. ClO4 concentration substantially
decreased in purified starch medium inoculated with the amylolytic bacterial consortium and Dechlorosoma sp. perclace. Potato
peel waste supported ClO4 reduction by perclace with the rate of ClO4 reduction being dependent on the amount of potato
peels. Over 90% ClO4 removal was achieved in 4 days in a single time point experiment with 2% (w/v) potato peels waste.
ClO4 reduction in a non-sterile 0.5% potato peel media inoculated with perclace occurred with an initial concentration of
10.14F0.04 mg L 1 to 2.87F0.4 mg L 1 (71.7% reduction) within 5 days. ClO4 was not detected in the cultures in 6 days. In a
non-sterile 0.5% potato media without perclace, ClO4 depletion occurred slowly from an initial value of 9.99F0.15 mg L 1 to
6.33F0.43 mg L 1 (36.63% reduction) in 5 days. Thereafter, ClO4 was rapidly degraded achieving 77.1% reduction in 7 days
and not detected in 9 days. No susbstantial reduction of ClO4 was observed in the sterile potato peel media without perclace in
7 days. Redox potential of the potato peel cultures was favorable for ClO4 reduction, decreasing to as low as 294 mV in 24 h.
Sugar levels remained very low in cultures effectively reducing ClO4 and was substantially higher in sterilized controls. Our
results indicate that potato peel waste in combination with amylolytic microorganisms and Dechlorosoma sp. perclace can be
economically used to achieve complete ClO4 removal from water.
D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Perchlorate; Water; Bioremediation; Carbon substrates; Starch hydrolysis; Potato peel waste
1. Introduction
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 909 787 3405; fax: +1 909 787
2954.
Perchlorate (ClO4 ) is detected in ground water
E-mail address: william.frankenberger@ucr.edu throughout the United States, because ammonium
(W.T. Frankenberger). ClO4 was extensively used in solid propellants for
0048-9697/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.041
36 B.C. Okeke, W.T. Frankenberger Jr. / Science of the Total Environment 347 (2005) 35–45
rockets, missiles, explosives, and pyrothechnics of ClO4 . Organic and inorganic electron donors
(Urbansky, 1998; Gullick et al., 2001; Logan, have been considered for ClO4 reduction in auto-
2001; Xu et al., 2003). ClO4 salts are highly soluble trophic and heterotrophic systems, respectively (Xu
in water (2000 g L 1 for sodium perchlorate) and et al., 2003). Organic carbon substances used as
adsorbs poorly in soil (Xu et al., 2003). Conse- electron donors include: acetate (Herman and Frank-
quently, natural water sources have been contami- enberger, 1999; Kim and Logan, 2001), acetic acid
nated with ClO4 . ClO4 is recalcitrant in the (Togna et al., 2001), ethanol (Hatzinger et al., 2000;
environment and is potentially toxic to various forms Greene and Pitre, 2000; Togna et al., 2001),
of life (Lamm et al., 1999) primarily due to adverse methanol (Hatzinger et al., 2000; Greene and Pitre,
effects on the thyroid gland (Capen, 1994; Von Burg, 2000), lactate (Brown et al., 2000), pyruvate (Brown
1995). Recent studies revealed that low concentra- et al., 2000), protein nutrients such as brewers yeast,
tions of ClO4 inhibit iodide uptake in humans as cottonseed protein or whey (Attaway and Smith,
well as animals (Lawrence et al., 2000; U.S. EPA, 1993), and molasses (Okeke et al., 2002). Hydrogen
2002). ClO4 contamination of wildlife and vegeta- has been used in autotrophic systems for ClO4
tion can have adverse effects on the growth of reduction (Giblin et al., 2000a,b; Miller and Logan,
amphibians (Goleman et al., 2002). The potential 2000; Nerenberg et al., 2002).
impact of ClO4 on human health has spurred There are many agro-industrial processes that
regulatory agencies to regulate ClO4 concentrations generate wastes that can be used as substrates for
in drinking water. In California, the Department of microbial growth (Mahmood et al., 1998). Micro-
Health Services (CDHS) established an action level organisms are capable of utilizing various compo-
of 6 Ag L 1 for potable water. The CDHS found nents of the organic matter in such wastes as a
ClO4 in drinking water wells in Riverside County carbon source for growth and for synthesis of
up to 29 Ag L 1 and up to 325 Ag L 1 in San cellular biomass as well. The most abundant solid
Bernardino County. High concentrations of up to component of plant materials is carbohydrates. The
180,000 Ag L 1 in ground water not associated with carbohydrate fraction of plants includes mono- and
contamination of public drinking water supplies disaccharide sugars, starch, and structural compo-
were, however, found in Santa Clara County (CDHS, nents such as cellulose, lignin, proteins, pectic
2004a,b). substances, and hemicelluloses which are closely
Remedial strategies for removal of ClO4 in related. Starch is the principal reserve polysaccharide
ground water, include membrane, ion-exchange found in many economically important crops such as
(IX), and biological technologies. Physicochemical potato, wheat, rice, maize, and tapioca (Nirmala and
water treatment technologies are expensive and less Muralikrishna, 2003; Van der Maarel et al., 2002).
attractive for ClO4 removal from ground water. Large-scale industrial starch processing has emerged
Microbial reduction of ClO4 to environmentally- in the last century (Van der Maarel et al., 2002). A
acceptable innocuous end products is currently an significant portion (30–70%) of the dry weight of
area of intense interest because this technology is these wastes is carbohydrates other than cellulose
relatively cost-effective and environmentally compat- and is therefore readily assimilatable by micro-
ible. Although several studies have addressed bio- organisms (Forage, 1979). Potato peel waste was
remediation of ClO4 (Romanenko et al., 1976; chosen for this study. Mahmood et al. (1998)
Wallace et al., 1996; Logan, 1998; Herman and demonstrated that the solid matter of the potato
Frankenberger, 1998, 1999; Urbansky and Schock, peels is predominantly starch. In processing, 20–
1999; Logan et al., 2000; Miller and Logan, 2002; 59% of the raw product can be generated as waste
Giblin et al., 2000a,b; Frankenberger and Herman, (Sistrunk et al., 1979). It is thus a suitable source of
2002; Giblin et al., 2002; Giblin and Frankenberger, simple and complex carbohydrates for ClO4 reduc-
2001; Losi et al., 2002; Logan et al., 2001; Okeke et tion. This study explores the potential application of
al., 2002; Bender et al., 2002; Okeke and Frank- starch in combination with an amylolytic bacterial
enberger, 2003), the cost of substrates will be a consortium and potato peel waste for ClO4 reduc-
major contributor to the economics of bioremediation tion in water.
B.C. Okeke, W.T. Frankenberger Jr. / Science of the Total Environment 347 (2005) 35–45 37
2. Materials and methods water) were added and incubated for 10 min at 65 8C.
The solution was extracted by adding 780 AL of
2.1. Microorganisms chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1), and centrifuged
for 5 min to separate aqueous and organic phases. The
The efficient ClO4 reducing bacterium, perclace aqueous phase containing the DNA was further
(Herman and Frankenberger, 1999) identified as a extracted with an equal volume of phenol-chloro-
Dechlorosoma sp. perclace (Xu et al., 2003) was used form-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) to remove impurities.
in this study. Amylolytic bacterial consortia were DNA present in the aqueous phase was precipitated
enriched from a mixture of soils and decaying leaf with 0.6 volumes of isopropanol and the DNA
litter. The sample was pulverized using a mortar and precipitate was washed with 70% (v/v) ethanol. The
pestle. Five grams of the sample was inoculated into DNA pellet was dried using a lyophilizer and re-
triplicate 100 mL sterile FTW mineral salts solution, suspended in nuclease-free water. Universal bacterial
to which soluble starch (1 g/L) was added. FTW primers corresponding to E. coli positions 27F and
medium (Herman and Frankenberger, 1999) is com- 519R were used for PCR amplification of 16S rRNA
prised (in g/L) of the following: K2HPO4, 0.225; gene. PCR master mix (Cat. No. M7502, Promega,
KH2PO4, 0.225; (NH4)2SO4, 0.225; MgSO47H2O, Madison, WI) was used according to the manufactur-
0.05; CaCO3, 0.005; FeCl2.4H2O, 0.005, and 1 mL of er’s instructions. Genomic DNA (1 AL) was the
trace elements solution (Focht, 1994). The medium template. DNA was amplified using a 35-cycle PCR
was sterilized by autoclaving (121 8C, 15 min) before (initial denaturation, 95 8C for 5 min; subsequent
adding the soil sample. The pH of the medium was denaturation, 95 8C for 1 min; annealing temperature,
adjusted to 7.4 before autoclaving (pH 7.2 after 48 8C for 1 min; extension temperature was 728C for
autoclaving). The aerobic cultures were incubated at 1 min; and final extension was 728C for 5 min). The
ambient temperature (22 8C) with orbital shaking (180 PCR product was analyzed on 2% agarose gel to
rpm) for 1 week (round 1 enrichment culture). visualize the product and was purified using a
Thereafter, 1 mL of the culture was transferred onto Microcon YM-10 centrifugal filter (Millipore Corpo-
a fresh sterile FTW enrichment medium plus 1 g/L ration, Bedford, MA). DNA cycle sequencing was
starch; and further incubated for 1 week (round 2 done with the ABI Prism BigDye terminator kit
enrichment culture). (Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA)
and an Applied Biosystems ABI 3100 genetic
2.2. Characterization of the amylolytic bacterial analyzer.
enrichment culture
2.3. Carbon substrates
The triplicate cultures were pooled together.
Bacterial composition of the amylolytic bacterial Soluble starch powder (J.T. Baker, Philipsburg, NJ)
enrichment cultures was purified by plating on the and potato peels were used. Potato peels (white and
enrichment medium solidified with 2% agar. Plates red skin) were air dried at room temperature (22 8C)
were incubated aerobically at 25 8C. Colonies were for 2 days. The potato peels were chopped into small
isolated, purified by repeated streaking, and main- pieces (approximately 1 cm1 cm0.1 cm). Moisture
tained on the same agar medium at 4 8C. Amylolytic content of the potato peels was estimated after drying
bacterial isolates were identified by 16S rDNA at 65 8C for 24 h to be 17.0F0.05% and 27.92F1.0%
sequencing as follows: DNA was extracted from the for the white and red peels, respectively.
suspension according to the method described by
Ausubel et al. (1987). Briefly, five to ten colonies of 2.4. ClO4 removal by the starch-degrading consortia
each bacterial isolate suspended in a mixture of TE and Dechlorosoma sp. perclace
buffer, SDS, and proteinase K, were incubated for 1 h
at 37 8C. NaCl (5 M) and CTAB/NaCl solution (4.1 g The medium was comprised of 150 mL of FTW
NaCl and 10 g CTAB [N-cetyl-N,N,N,-trimethylam- mineral solution (pH 7.4) in 250 mL Erlenmeyer
moniumbromide] in pre-warmed 100 mL distilled flasks plus either starch (1% w/v) or potato peels (2%
38 B.C. Okeke, W.T. Frankenberger Jr. / Science of the Total Environment 347 (2005) 35–45
w/v). In independent parallel experiments, 350 AL of sugar was calculated from a glucose standard curve
amylolytic bacterial consortia (OD600 of one-tenth ( Y=0.336X+0.0016; r 2=0.999).
dilution=0.576) and/or the ClO4 -respiring bacterium,
Dechlorosoma sp., perclace (OD600 of one-tenth 2.8. Protein determination
dilution=0.538) were added. Cultures were incubated
at room temperature (approximately 22 8C). The white Protein was quantified by the standard Bradford
potato peel was selected for further studies and the method (Bradford, 1976) using CoomassieR protein
effects of different concentrations were tested in the assay reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Briefly, 50 AL of
range of 0.5–2%, w/v. supernatant sample was added to 1 mL CoomassieR
reagent. Absorbance was read at 595 nm using a
2.5. Time course of ClO4 removal using potato peels Varian Cary 1E UV–Visible spectrophotometer.
as carbon source Protein concentration was then quantified from the
following regression equation: Y=0.0031X+0.0058,
This was conducted in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks r 2=0.997.
containing 150 mL of FTW mineral solution and
0.5% (w/v) potato peels. One set was sterilized by 2.9. Analysis of ClO4 and other anions
autoclaving (121 8C for 15 min) and the other was
non-sterile. Both sterile and non-sterile medium were High concentrations of ClO4 (1 to 10 mg L 1)
each inoculated with 180 AL of Dechlorosoma sp. were analyzed using a ClO4 specific electrode (model
perclace (OD600 of one-tenth dilution=0.221). Flasks 93–81, Orion Research, Boston, MA). Lower con-
were stoppered with rubber stoppers and cultures centrations (b1 to 0.004 mg/L) were determined by
were then incubated at room temperature (22 8C). ion-chromatography. Samples were filtered using a
Aliquots of the cultures were removed daily for membrane filter (0.22 Am). ClO4 concentration in the
analysis. filtrate was analyzed using a Dionex ion-chromatog-
raphy system (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA), equipped
2.6. Redox potential (Eh) and pH with a GP40 gradient pump, an AS40 automated
sampler, 740 AL injection loop, an ionPac AS11
A model 720A pH/ISE meter (Thermo Orion, column, and an ED40 conductivity detector. The
Beverly, MA) was used to measure pH and redox eluent was 100 mM NaOH at 1 mL min 1. An ASRS-
potential (Eh). Eh was measured with an Accumet II (4 mm) suppressor, operated by external regener-
combination platinum electrode (Ag/AgCl). The Eh ation using 50 mM H2SO4 to suppress the eluent was
electrode was tested by immersion in pH 4 and 7 buffer used.
solutions saturated with quinhydrone (Q2H2) before
each analysis. The measured potential (Ehmeasured) was
converted to actual Eh of starch and potato peels 3. Results
solution (Ehactual) relative to a standard H electrode as
follows: Ehactual=Ehmeasured+224.4 mV (Jayaweera 3.1. Starch degrading bacterial consortia
and Biggar, 1996).
By using starch as the sole source of carbon and
2.7. Determination of sugar content of cultures energy, an efficient starch degrading bacterial con-
sortium was achieved after three rounds of enrichment.
This was determined by the dinitrosalicyclic acid Reaction of an aliquot of the enrichment culture with
(DNS) method (Miller, 1959). Briefly, 0.5 mL sample iodine produced no blue black color indicating
and 0.5 mL DNS were mixed and the mixture was complete breakdown of starch to low molecular weight
heated in boiling water for 10 min to develop the red– compounds. Six bacteria capable of growing on starch
brown color. Thereafter 1 mL of 40% potassium– as the sole source of carbon and energy were isolated
sodium-tartarate was added and then cooled to room from the amylolytic bacterial enrichment. The isolates
temperature. Absorbance was read at 575 nm and were identified by analysis of 16S rDNA as Citro-
B.C. Okeke, W.T. Frankenberger Jr. / Science of the Total Environment 347 (2005) 35–45 39
Table 2
Effect of inoculation of the amylolytic bacterial consortia and Dechlorosoma sp. perc1ace on ClO4 removal using soluble starch (1%, w/v) as
carbon source
Treatments ClO4 (mg/L) Redox potential (Eh) pH
Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final
Starch+amylolytic bacteria 10.22F0.12 10.14F0.17 376F3 208F7 7.22F0.04 5.03F0.11
Starch+perclace 10.32F0.15 10.25F0.21 381F5 209F6 7.22F0.01 7.03F0.03
Starch+amylolytic bacteria+perclace 10.36F0.28 7.15F0.11 379F5 207F5 7.24F004 5.10F0.04
Cultures were incubated at 22 8C for 4 days. Results are means of triplicate independent experimentsFstandard deviation (N 1).
40 B.C. Okeke, W.T. Frankenberger Jr. / Science of the Total Environment 347 (2005) 35–45
Table 3
ClO4 removal using white potato peels (2%, w/v) as a carbon source with the amylolytic bacterial consortia and Dechlorosoma sp. perclace
Treatments ClO4 (mg/L) Redox potential (Eh) pH
Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final
Potato peels+amylolytic bacteria 10.20F0.29 3.04F0.08 387F4 278F10 7.22F0.03 5.82F0.02
Potato peels+perclace 10.12F0.15 0.67F0.09 382F7 284F1.1 7.28F0.03 5.79F0.12
Potato peels+amylolytic bacteria+perclace 10.25F0.51 0.94F0.08 392F4 279F13 7.23F.01 5.81F0.03
Cultures were incubated at 22 8C for 4 days. Results are means of triplicate independent experimentsFstandard deviation (N 1).
Thereafter, ClO4 was rapidly degraded achieving 3.6. Changes in redox potential
77.1% reduction in 7 days. IC analysis of this medium
after day 9 revealed no detectable level of ClO4 . In a Changes in redox potential of the potato peel media
sterile potato peel medium inoculated with Dichlor- are presented in Fig. 4. The redox potential dropped
osoma sp. perclace, ClO4 decreased slowly from rapidly reaching 291.8 mV, 293.5 mV, and 128
10.08F0.02 mg L 1 to 8.47F0.23 mg L 1 (15.97% mV in the non-sterile medium inoculated with
reduction) in 5 days and to 6.63F0.49 mg L 1 Dichlorosoma sp. perclace, the non-sterile medium
(34.23%) in 7 days. No susbstantial reduction of without inoculation, and the sterile medium inoculated
ClO4 was observed in the sterile potato peel medium with Dichlorosoma sp. perclace, respectively, in 24 h.
that had not been inoculated with Dichlorosoma sp. Redox readings remained low in these three cultures
perclace during a 7 day incubation period. between day 1 and day 4. Thereafter, a sharp increase
in redox potential was recorded in the non-sterile
3.5. Sugar levels in potato peel cultures media from day 4 to day 5 and was subsequently
stable at about 100 mV from day 6 to day 7. Redox
Sugar content of the potato peel cultures was potential increased only slightly from day 4 in the
estimated by the DNS method and is presented in Fig. sterile potato peel medium inoculated with Dichlor-
3. In general, the concentration of sugar was highest osoma sp. perclace. In the uninoculated sterile potato
in the sterile potato peel media. Sugar levels in both peel medium, redox potential decreased only slightly
the inoculated and uninoculated non-sterile potato reaching only 47.43 mV in 4 days and subsequently
peel media decreased substantially after 1 day and stabilized.
thereafter remained very low with growth of the
culture during the 7 days of incubation. In the sterile 3.7. Soluble protein in cultures
potato peel medium inoculated with Dichlorosoma sp.
perclace, the sugar level decreased substantially from Changes in soluble protein content were used to
0.14 mg L 1 to 0.09 mg L 1 in 2 days. Analysis of monitor microbial growth in the potato peel media
the sterile potato media that had not been inoculated (Fig. 5). In the non-sterile potato peel media
with Dichlorosoma sp. perclace showed a sharp rise inoculated with Dichlorosoma sp. perclace and the
in sugar level from day 2 (0.15 mg L 1) to day 4 (0.51 non-inoculated medium, protein levels generally
mg L 1) and thereafter stabilized. increased. A sharp increase was observed in the first
Table 4
ClO4 removal using red potato peels (2%, w/v) as carbon source with the amylolytic bacterial consortia and Dechlorosoma sp. perclace
Treatments ClO4 (mg/L) Redox potential (Eh) pH
Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final
Potato peels+amylolytic bacteria 9.74F0.11 4.29F0.23 397F3 235F8 7.22F0.02 5.78F0.04
Potato peels+perclace 9.95F0.68 1.46F0.35 407F3 226F21 7.22F0.02 5.80F0.14
Potato peels+amylolytic bacteria+perclace 10.25F0.38 1.91F0.48 406F9 245F8 7.25F0.03 5.78F0.03
Cultures were incubated at 22 8C for 4 days. Results are means of triplicate independent experimentsFstandard deviation (N 1).
B.C. Okeke, W.T. Frankenberger Jr. / Science of the Total Environment 347 (2005) 35–45 41
12 0.6
0.5
Remaining ClO4- (mg L-1)
10
12 400
10 300
Redox potential (Eh)
200
ClO4- (mg L-1)
8
100
6
0
4 -100
2 -200
-300
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -400
Incubation time (Days) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9
Incubation time (Days)
Fig. 2. ClO4 levels in 0.5% potato peel cultures during 7 days of
incubation. Sterile medium (.), sterile medium+Dechlorosoma sp. Fig. 4. Changes redox potential of cultures during 7-day of
perclace (E), non-sterile medium (n), and non-sterile medium+ incubation. Sterile medium (.), sterile medium+Dechlorosoma
Dechlorosoma sp. perc1ace (x). Results are means of triplicate sp. perclace (E), non-sterile medium (n), and non-sterile medium+
independent experiments. Standard deviation (N 1) bars are Dechlorosoma sp. perc1ace (x). Results are means of triplicate
shown. independent experiments.
42 B.C. Okeke, W.T. Frankenberger Jr. / Science of the Total Environment 347 (2005) 35–45
CDHS (California Department of Health Services). Perchlorate: Jayaweera GR, Biggar JW. Role of redox potential in chemical
early findings in drinking water. http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/ transformations of selenium in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J
ddwem/chemicals/perchl/earlyfindings.htm. 2004. 1996;60:1056 – 63.
CDHS. Perchlorate drinking water action level and regulation. Kim K, Logan BE. Fixed-bed bioreactor treating per-
Department of Health Services, Sacramento, California. http:// chlorate-contaminated waters. Environ Eng Sci 2000;17:
www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/ddwem/chemicals/perchl/actionlevel.htm. 257 – 65.
2004. Kim K, Logan BE. Microbial reduction of perchlorate in pure and
Focht DD. Microbiological procedures for biodegradation research. mixed culture packed-bed bioreactors. Water Res 2002;
In: Weaver RW, et al, editors. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. 35:3071 – 6.
Microbiological and biochemical properties, vol. 5. Madison7 Lamm SH, Bravermman LE, Li FX, Pino S, Howearth G. Thyroid
Soil Science Society of America; 1994. p. 407 – 26. health status of ammonium perchlorate workers: a cross
Forage AJ. Utilization of agricultural and food processing wastes sectional occupational health study. J Occup Environ Med
containing carbohydrates. Chem Soc Revs 1979;8:309 – 14. 1999;41:248 – 60.
Frankenberger WT, Herman DC. Bacterial removal of perchlorate Lawrence JE, Lamm SH, Pino S, Richman K, Braverman LE. The
and nitrate. US Patent’ 2002, No. 6,077,429. effect of short-term low-dose perchlorate on various aspects of
Giblin T, Frankenberger WT. Perchlorate and nitrate reductase thyroid function. Thyroid 2000;10:659 – 63.
activity in the perchlorate-respiring bacterium perclace. Micro- Logan BE. A review of chlorate- and perchlorate-respiring micro-
biol Res 2001;156:311 – 5. organisms. Bioremed J 1998;2:69 – 79.
Giblin T, Herman DC, Frankenberger WT. Removal of perchlorate Logan BE, Zhang H, Wu J, Unz R, Koenigsberg SS. The potential
from ground water by hydrogen-utilizing bacteria. J Environ for in situ perchlorate degradation. Second International Confer-
Qual 2000a;29:1057 – 62. ence on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Com-
Giblin T, Herman D, Deshusses MA, Frankenberger Jr WT. pounds, Monterey, California, 2000.
Removal of perchlorate in ground water with a flow-through Logan BE. Assessing the outlook of perchlorate remediation.
bioreactor. J Environ Qual 2000b;29:578 – 83. Environ Sci Technol 2001;35:482A – 7A.
Giblin T, Losi ME, Hosangadi V, Frankenberger WT. Bacterial Logan BE, Wu J, Unz RF. Biological perchlorate reduction in high-
perchlorate reduction in simulated reverse osmosis rejectate. salinity solutions. Water Res 2001;35:3034 – 8.
Bioremed J 2002;6:105 – 11. Losi ME, Giblin T, Hosangadi V, Frankenberger WT. Bioremedia-
Goleman WL, Urquidi LJ, Anderson TA, Smith EE, Kendall RJ, tion of perchlorate-contaminated groundwater using a packed
Carr JA. Environmentally relevant concentrations of ammonium bed biological reactor. Bioremed J 2002;6:97 – 103.
perchlorate inhibit development and metamorphosis in Xenopus Mahmood AU, Greenman J, Scragg AH. Orange and potato peel
laevis. Environ Toxicol Chem 2002;21:424 – 30. extracts: analysis and use as Bacillus substrates for the
Greene MR, Pitre MP. Treatment of Ground water containing production of extracellular enzymes in continuous culture.
perchlorate using biological fluidized bed reactors with GAC Enzyme Microb Technol 1998;22:130 – 7.
or sand media. In: Urbansky ET, editor. Perchlorate in Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicyclic acid reagent for determination of
the environment. New York7 Kluwer Academic Press; 2000 reducing sugars. Anal Chem 1959;31:426 – 8.
p. 241–56. Miller J, Logan BE. Sustained perchlorate degradation in an
Gullick RQ, Lechvallier MW, Barhorst TAS. Occurrence of autotrophic, gas-phase, packed-bed bioreactor. Environ Sci
perchlorate in drinking water sources. J-Am Water Works Assoc Technol 2002;34:3018 – 22.
2001;93:66 – 77. Nerenberg R, Rittmann BE, Najm I. Perchlorate reduction in a
Gupta R, Gigras P, Mohapatra H, Goswami VK, Chauhan B. hydrogen-based membrane-biofilm reactor. J Am Water Work
Microbial a-amylases: a biotechnological perspective. Process Assoc 2002;94:103 – 14.
Biochem 2003;38:1599 – 616. Nirmala M, Muralikrishna G. In vitro digestibility studies of cereal
Haki GD, Rakshit SK. Developments in industrially important flours and starches using purified finger millet (Eleusine
thermostable enzymes: a review. Biores Technol 2003;89:7 – 34. coracana, ragi, Indaf-15) amylases. Carbohydr Polym 2003;
Hatzinger PB, Greene MR, Frisch S, Togna AP, Manning J, Guarini 52:275 – 83.
WJ. Biological treatment of perchlorate-contaminated ground Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT. Molecular analysis of a perchlorate
water using fluidized bed reactor. Second International Confer- reductase from a novel perchlorate respiring bacterium, per-
ence on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Com- clace. Microbiol Res 2003;158:337 – 44.
pounds, Monterey, California, 2000. Okeke BC, Giblin T, Frankenberger WT. Reduction of perchlorate
Herman DC, Frankenberger Jr WT. Microbial-mediated reduction of and nitrate by salt tolerant bacteria. Environ Pollut 2002;118:
perchlorate in groundwater. J Environ Qual 1998;27:750 – 4. 357 – 63.
Herman DC, Frankenberger WT. Bacterial reduction of per- Romanenko VI, Korenkov VN, Kuznetsov SI. Bacterial decom-
chlorate and nitrate in water. J Environ Qual 1999;28: position of ammonium perchlorate. Mikrobiologiya 1976;45:
1018 – 24. 204 – 9.
JanNielsen TH, Deiting U, Stitt M. A beta-amylase in potato tubers Sistrunk WA, Ismail M, Collins JA. Bacterial fermentation of
is induced by storage at low temperature. Plant Physiol high alkaline wastes from Irish potatoes. J Food Sci
1997;113:503 – 10. 1979;44:439 – 42.
B.C. Okeke, W.T. Frankenberger Jr. / Science of the Total Environment 347 (2005) 35–45 45
Togna AP, Guarini WJ, Frisch S, Vecchio MD, Cliffmurray JP, Van Ginkel CG, Plugge CM, Stroo CA. Reduction of perchlorate
Tolbert DE. Case study of ex-situ biological treatment of with various energy substrates and inocula under anaerobic
perchlorate-contaminated ground water. Sixth International conditions. Chemosphere 1995;31:4057 – 66.
Symposium on In Situ and On-site Bioremediation, San Diego, Viksonielsen A, Christensen TMIE, Bojko M, Marcussen J.
California, 2001. Purification and characterization of beta-amylase from leaves
Urbansky ET. Perchlorate chemistry Implications for analysis and of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Physiol Plant 1997;99:190 – 6.
remediation. Bioremed J 1998;2:81 – 95. Von Burg R. Toxicology update—perchlorates. J Appl Toxicol
Urbansky ET, Schock MR. Issues in managing the risks associated 1995;15:237 – 41.
with perchlorate in drinking water. J Environ Manage Wallace W, Ward T, Breen A, Attaway H. Identification of an
1999;56:79 – 95. anaerobic bacterium which reduces perchlorate and chlorate as
U.S. EPA. Perchlorate environmental contamination: toxicological Wolinella succinogenes. J Ind Microbiol 1996;16:68 – 72.
review and risk characterization (external review draft). NCEA- Witt W, Sauter JJ. Purification and properties of a starch granule-
1-0503. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection degrading alpha-amylase from potato tubers. J Exp Bot 1996;
Agency, Office of Research and Development (cited by Xu et 47:1789 – 95.
al. 2003); 2002. Xu J, Song Y, Min B, Steinberg L, Logan BE. Microbial
Van der Maarel MJEC, Van der Veen B, Uitdehaag JCM, Leemhuis degradation of perchlorate: principles and applications. Environ
H, Dijkhuizen L. Properties and applications of starch-convert- Eng Sci 2003;20:405 – 22.
ing enzymes of the a-amylase family. J Biotechnol 2002;94:
137 – 55.