Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ED 327
Dr. McAllister
May 3, 2019
Video Reflection
The lesson I taught on April 22nd in Mrs. Hewitt’s 8th grade classroom went mostly as
planned. However, I did hit a few instructional snags and I could have been more intentional
As you can see in my lesson plan and in my video, I taught a lesson about the plot
diagram using a chapter from The Sword and the Circle, which is a collection of Arthurian tales.
My content objective was for students to “be able to analyze basic story structure, in sequence,
through the use of the plot diagram.” In my plan, I tried to meet several Indiana English
standards:
8.RL.1
Read a variety of literature within a range of complexity appropriate for grades 6-8. By
the end of grade 8, students interact with texts proficiently and independently.
8.W.3.3
● Engage and orient the reader by establishing a context and point of view and
● Organize an event sequence (e.g., conflict, climax, resolution) that unfolds naturally
and logically, using a variety of transition words, phrases, and clauses to convey
sequence and signal shifts from one time frame or setting to another.
● Use narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, to
● Use precise words and phrases, relevant descriptive details, and sensory language to
● Provide an ending that follows from and reflects on the narrated experiences or events.
8.SL.2.1
teacher-led) on grade-appropriate topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and
By teaching students the structure of the plot diagram, and by helping them apply the
diagram to stories they were familiar with, I hoped to uphold standard 8.RL.1: By giving
students a tool with which they could understand the basic structure of any story, I hoped to
enable my students to interact with texts more deeply, proficiently, and independently. In a
similar vein, I believe that an understanding of the plot diagram will serve students well in their
own narrative writing (standard 8.W.3.3). Students will understand that good stories need
conflict and a logical sequence of events in which the stakes continue to rise. The plot diagram is
also a useful tool for organizing thoughts when students begin drafting stories. By placing
students in new groups and having them collaborate with each other, I asked students to build off
The reason I moved students into groups was actually twofold: I was also striving to meet
the developmental needs of adolescent learners. Adolescents crave positive social interaction
with peers. They also crave movement. By moving students into new groups, I hoped to meet
both these needs. I also allowed for movement by asking students to attach their answers to the
whiteboard.
Adolescents need positive social interaction with adults just as badly as they need it with
peers. Middle school learners also require a structure that allows for competence and
students as often as possible. When they did good work, I always praised them and explained
why their work was desirable. Even when students gave an incorrect answer, I was empathetic
and acknowledged the accurate parts of the answer before correcting the inaccurate parts. You
I also allowed for self-definition and creative expression by asking students to diagram
one of their favorite stories, then share it with their tablemates. By allowing students to pick a
story that is relevant to their own lives, I allow students to more meaningfully connect with the
curriculum. This was also a culturally sensitive choice toward diverse learners: By allowing
students to choose any story they want, I avoid assuming cultural schema. I used this assignment
as assessment data: This was the final task I assigned to students. I visited tables and listened to
students. I silently determined whether students were applying the plot diagram accurately.
There were a few adolescent needs I did not attempt to meet. I did not necessarily
concern myself with structure and clear limits: Mrs. Hewitt had already done that work for me.
The classroom was well-behaved and I fortunately did not have to worry about behavior
management. I also failed to observe the adolescent need of meaningful participation in families,
schools, and communities. Again, this had mostly to do with the fact that I was only teaching one
self-contained lesson. Were I to revise this lesson for a larger unit, I might ask students to go
home and ask their parents to share a folktale. Students would then diagram the folktale using the
plot diagram. This would be a great way to get parents involved and to celebrate cultural
My primary failure in teaching this lesson was that I lectured much more than I had
planned on. Although a lot of student collaboration happened while students reviewed the text
and filled out their slips, I was hoping to facilitate a debate once all the slips were on the board.
This debate, for the most part, did not happen. I had originally planned to circle up the desks, but
I did not want to destroy Mrs. Hewitt’s classroom or eat up a lot of time. Subsequently, the
debate did not feel like a debate to the students: They did not know how to respond to my
instruction. Rather than facilitating a debate, I ended up asking a lot of guiding questions in an
attempt to get my students talking. I failed to set a structure or clear limits. I could have avoided
this by creating a structured debate with a timer, notecards, opposing seating, etc. Another
weakness that contributed to my lecturing is that I had a short wait time: I felt uncomfortable
Shari Switzer was able to observe this lesson. She had a lot of positive things to say on
her observation form. She thought it was helpful that I connected my content to relevant pop
culture, such as Harry Potter and The Hunger Games. Shari praised me for challenging my
students by asking, “Can you tell me more?” She also recognized the intentionality behind
moving my students into new groups. Shari was also gracious enough to identify areas in which I
can grow: She noticed that I did not share my content objective with my students. As a result,
students moved from one activity to the next with no clear context or end goal in mind. I view
this as a significant mistake and one I will learn from moving forward. Shari also suggested
giving a “time frame” for each activity, so students knew how long to spend discussing a given
topic. Finally, Shari noticed my joke about the whiteboard plot diagram turning into “an absolute
mess” and asked me how I could make it more organized next time.
Shari seemed especially impressed with my “very effective demeanor” with the middle
school students. I often struggle with striking the perfect balance between relatable and funny,
but also professional and informative. It seems that Shari believes I am close to finding this
balance.
Overall, I am grateful for this opportunity to “get my toes wet.” This was my first time
teaching an entire classroom an original lesson plan without assistance. A big takeaway is that
you cannot “wing” a lesson: I more or less tried to “wing” the debate segment of my lesson, and
it failed altogether. The other parts of my lesson plan, which were detailed and clearly structured,
went exactly according to plan. In other words, a lesson plan can never be too detailed. I would
also like to improve my wait time and to begin thinking about the big-picture strategies I can use