Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
of its history.
Its current shape and size.
Its future perspectives.
The Social
Economy
in Poland
1
strong civil society, which studies • Disseminating information about ment, and strengthening civil society.
have shown is weak in Poland7. the social economy to the general
But Poland’s social economy sector
public and decision-makers;
Since the beginning of the EQUAL has yet to develop its potential: it
Initiative projects in 2005, concrete • Advising and offering financial makes up 3.9% of the labor market
steps have been taken to develop support to emerging social economy in Poland, compared to 8.3% in
the social economy in Poland by: institutions; France, 9% in Ireland, and 7.5% in
Finland8.
• Lobbying the government to use
7. For example: Czapiński, J. and Panek, T. (eds.)
the social economy as a tool for
(2007) „Diagnoza Społeczna:
Warunki i jakość życia Polaków”. addressing social challenges such as
Available at: http://www.diagnoza.com/. unemployment, economic develop- 8. CIREC Report, 2005.
5
Social Cooperatives was adopted. nearly disappeared during the com- a turnover of nearly 50 million Euros
They take on the form of worker munist period. Mutual organizations in 200511).
cooperatives and support the labor are now re-emerging primarily as
market and social reintegration of lending and savings institutions, of
their members, above all. which there are around 900, but
also as insurance companies, which
• Mutual Organizations: popular are fewer in number but make a sig-
before World War II in Poland, they nificant economic contribution (with 11. Ibid.
8
Two other types of institutional ers and local government institutions economic activity to such a degree
forms can play a significant role in and offer transitional employment as to be considered social economy
supporting the development of the programs for the most marginalized institutions:
social economy sector. They can be social groups. In some cases, these
established by NGO’s, welfare cent- institutions are able to develop their
9
• Social Integration Centers (CIS): and employment for people from • Employment Activation Units
Over 50 CIS have been established socially marginalized groups (espe- (ZAZ): around 40 ZAZ offer social
since they were introduced by the cially the long-term unemployed, and employment reintegration pro-
2003 Act on Social Employment. CIS the homeless, formerly incarcerated grams specifically to the physically
provide vocational training programs individuals, and refugees). and mentally disabled.
Hotel “At Mr. Cogito’s”
11
engage community members in local activities, both institutions foster to facilitate their sustainability on the
development projects. entrepreneurial attitudes and social open market. An amendment of the
cohesion which is the basis for the Act is currently being discussed in
2) The Social Integration Center (CIS) is
development of the social economy Parliament.
established by welfare centers, NGO’s
sector.
or local government as an independent The newest legislation proposed in
institution that offers work-integration • The Act on Social Cooperatives Poland is an act on social enterpri-
programs consisting of psychological (27 April 2006) was inspired by Ita- ses, which it is currently being discus-
support and vocational training (in lian Type-B social cooperatives and sed among NGO’s, social leaders and
skills such as carpentry, steel-works, defined Polish social cooperatives various government actors. Several
sewing) for people from the most vul- as enterprises established by people other countries, including Italy and
nerable social groups (the homeless, from especially vulnerable social Finland, have already legally defined
unemployed, formerly incarcerated in- groups (the homeless, long-term the social enterprise.
dividuals, people with substance abuse unemployed, formerly incarcerated
problems, refugees, and the mentally individuals, people with substance
and physically disabled). Earning a abuse, refugees, and the mentally
small income from the work that CIS and physically disabled). Their prima-
beneficiaries complete is a key element ry objective must be to support the
in the integration process. CIS can offer social and economic re-integration
goods and services on the open market of their members. Experiences from
but has extensive financial support of the first social cooperatives have
public administration. prompted a call to reform the act
Although KIS are not a social econo- by easing membership requirements
my institution and few CIS manage to and by expanding the available finan-
generate significant profit from their cial and institutional support in order
13
The Social Economy and difficulties in re-entering an active that develop new and relevant skills.
Local Development in social and economic life, much of the Social economy institutions can also
Poland Polish population remains convinced be established for the unique purpo-
that the state should provide employ- se of employing people who have a
The social economy is a powerful ment to anyone who wants it12. With permanently delicate situation on the
source of creative and practical so- time, social economy institutions can labor market, such as the physically
lutions that can have an impact not flourish and make a lasting contribu- and mentally disabled. People from
only on the economic, but also the tion in the following areas, many of such social groups require long-term,
social development of people and which were traditionally a domain of o�en individualized, assistance pro-
their communities. It engages people welfare institutions’ activity: grams encompassing not only voca-
in local initiatives, promotes an entre- tional training but also psychological
• Labor market integration: Social
preneurial spirit, develops networks support. Social economy institutions’
economy institutions can support
of cooperation between institutions competitive advantage is in fact their
the social and labor market integra-
from different sectors, and provides ability to offer consistent and specia-
tion of people who find themselves
stable employment. lized support to the most vulnerable
in a difficult economic situation, such
social groups.
Moreover, the social economy is com- as young people, people over 50
petent in many fields that traditional- years of age, and those transitioning • Services provision: Institutions in
ly belonged to the welfare state, but to new employment. The social eco- the social economy sector can thrive
has the additional advantage of being nomy can support such social groups by selling a wide range of services
locally embedded and thus adaptable in adjusting to changing labor market focused on a specific target group
to changing local needs. Although conditions through training programs (ex. services that complement core
the existing welfare state system has hospital staff, employment counse-
proved ineffective in limiting social 12. A Klon/Jawor Association study: ling, or vocational training), or that
“Kondycja sektora organizacji pozarządowych
exclusion and helping those with w Polsce 2006”.
satisfy a general public need (ex. nur-
16
series, care services for the elderly, or my institutions can provide such spe- can also be successful in offering pu-
shelters for the homeless). Because cialized services at a high quality and blic services such as urban greening,
of their local focus, small to medium a low cost and still thrive on the open maintenance, and transportation.
size, and social mission, social econo- market. The social enterprise sector Some social economy institutions
Social Readjustment Center ECO „School of Life”
„Opportunity and Support” Social Cooperative
19
(most commonly cooperatives or • Goods production: Social econo- tions engaging in goods production
NGO’s) compete outright with other my institutions can engage in a broad employ people from the most vul-
private firms in providing catering, range of goods production; they can nerable social groups on the labor
hotel and tourism services, but simul- produce goods from start to finish or market, they tend to flourish in the
taneously employ people from the provide specialized parts for larger production of labor-intensive, spe-
most vulnerable social groups. products prepared by other firms. cialized, hand-made products such
Since most social economy institu- as carpentry, sewing, and furniture-
making. Many social economy insti- enterprises can sustain themselves • communities to strengthen social
tutions also work in the production on the market by simultaneously ties and activate community mem-
of goods that reflect the particular encouraging and capitalizing upon a bers,
character or asset of the local com- sense of community.
• the state, which identifies social
munity, such as local food specialties
economy institutions as valuable
and souvenirs.
partners in decreasing unemploy-
• Community development: The The Challenges Facing the ment, strengthening civil society, and
social economy can also engage in Social Economy in Poland modernizing the existing ineffective
activities that foster social cohesion welfare system.
and a sense of community by buil- The fruits of the efforts to develop
the social economy can be seen in the Yet, more work needs to be done to
ding on a community that already
increasing number of social economy develop the social economy in Po-
exists (ex. a village food cooperative
institutions, a changing legal environ- land. The key challenges facing this
or a local historical/cultural society),
ment, and the growing optimism and sector can also be understood as the
or creating communities where there
enthusiasm about the social economy main goals for its future:
were none before (ex. among consu-
mers with common interests, such as among the public. The social econo- • Modernizing the cooperative
environmental protection, or needs, my has been recognized as a source sector: Cooperatives in Poland are
like organic produce). Social economy of opportunities for: sometimes negatively associated
institutions can thus protect the na- • individuals to gain employment and with the communist period, and the
tural environment (ex. parks, ecologi- a stable income, sector comprises institutions that
cally-friendly living, and biodiversity), do not have a clear social agenda:
or uphold and strengthen a common • institutions to gain inspiration for in a recent survey, only 10% of
heritage or local culture (ex. theaters, their work and maintain financial cooperatives cited improvement of
museums and libraries). Such social independence for their activities, their community or society as their
23
objective13. The cooperative sector to include larger cooperatives that the Act on Social Cooperatives sho-
must be better understood by the provide goods and services to the uld be amended to relax the mem-
Polish public and should evolve wider public. Moreover, more social bership requirements, and to provide
cooperatives should be established improved start-up funding schemes
13. A Klon/Jawor Association study: to provide employment for the most and institutional support for new
“Kondycja sektora organizacji pozarządowych
w Polsce 2006”.
vulnerable social groups. To this end social cooperatives.
Service-Trade-Production Social Cooperative
25
• Economizing the NGO sector: labour market and a stronger partner targeted social groups. Moreover,
Based on a recent survey, among for the public sector in implementing there should be productive debate to
social economy institutions, NGO’s effective social policy. In order to finalize the anticipated act on social
are the least likely to take on the become stronger economically, ho- enterprises. Legally defining a social
risk of starting a business activity14. wever, there should be a concerted enterprise will undoubtedly give new
The widely held belief that economic effort to promote entrepreneurial momentum to the growth of the so-
activity is incompatible with social behaviour among NGO leaders and cial economy sector and help broadly
mission further inhibits economic de- NGO’s should capitalize on the possi- promote the idea of entrepreneurial
velopment of the NGO sector. On the bility to engage in income-generating activity.
other hand, NGO’s face tremendous activities.
• Capitalizing on the social economy
competition over limited funding
• More social enterprises: New insti- for local development: The national
opportunities and the economic we-
tutional forms in the social economy, government has already distinguished
ight of the sector remains small: in
such as Social Integration Centres-CIS the social economy as a priority for its
2005, 50% of NGO’s in Poland pro-
and Employment Activation Units- support in the National Development
cessed less than 10,000PLN; only 1
ZAZ, are still few and far between. Strategy for the years 2007-2013.
in 5 NGO’s employ paid personnel;
More should be established and However, the social economy should
and only 6.9% of those that run an
they should function as an integra- be included in long-term development
income-generating activity earned
ted network rather than as isolated strategies, with reference to the infor-
at least 20% of their total financial
institutions in order to strengthen mation and experience gained through
turnover. An economically powerful
their position on the labour market the EQUAL Initiative projects. In con-
NGO sector in Poland can become a
in relation to public administration. trast, local governments o�en do not
source of stable employment on the
By working as an integrated network, recognize the role that the sector can
they will also increase their capacity play in developing democracy, civil so-
14. Ibid. to make a meaningful impact on their ciety and local economic growth. The
26
social economy should be promoted of mobilizing regional leaders across • Better use of different financing
as a tool for community development, sectors to capitalize on the social eco- mechanisms: The social economy
both economic and social, and local nomy as a mechanism of local deve- should capitalize on a variety of
decision-makers should incorporate lopment is the 2008 Social Economy income sources. Funding mechani-
the social economy in local develop- Pact in the Małopolska region in the sms such as the European Union
ment strategies – a good example South of Poland. structural funds are important in
developing institutional capacity: • Enrooting the social economy in which will strengthen lobbying efforts
between 2007-2013, around 8 society: Although the social economy and promote a unified image of the
million Euros will be disbursed by has a long history in Poland, it is o�en sector. SKES has already presented
regional governments in Poland perceived as a foreign concept. More- government representatives with re-
each year through the Human Capi- over, studies have shown that there is commendations for the development
tal Operational Program to support a remarkably low level of social capital of the social economy in Poland and is
the social economy sector. The among Poles, which makes developing awaiting a response.
Polish government can also offer the social economy simultaneously a
a range of incentives to facilitate challenge (because it is built on a foun-
activity in the social economy, such dation of strong social networks) and
as tax deductions, employment sub- a necessity (because it fosters a spirit
sidies, and start-up capital schemes. of partnership and civic engagement).
Introducing social criteria in public Thus, decision-makers and the public
procurement policies would also (particularly as consumers) should be
encourage the development of educated about the benefits of the
social economy institutions in the social economy sector. Awareness
domain of service provision. These raising campaigns should also be or-
income sources, however, should ganized among potential beneficiaries
not replace profit-generating activi- of social economy initiatives, who are
ties internal to social economy insti- o�en weary of taking on the risk that
tutions, but serve to stimulate them enterprising activity involves. In order
and help maximize their capacity to to promote the social economy sec-
independently sustain themselves tor, platforms such as the Permanent
on the open market. Social Economy Conference (SKES:
www.skes.pl) should be developed,
For more information about the social economy sector in Poland and the key institutions working to develop it,
we invite you to browse the following websites:
www.ekonomiaspoleczna.pl
www.skes.pl
www.bezrobocie.org.pl
ISBN: 83-85928-78-2
This pamphlet was published as part of the project „PROMES – Promotion of Social Economy”
realized with funding from the European Social Fund EQUAL Initiative