Search Upload EN

Titles you can't find anywhere else

Home

0 0 RELATED TITLES
1 views
Saved

LBP vs People
Bestsellers Uploaded by Julian Duba on Jul 27,
2018

Books Natres digest Full description

Deed of Sale With TPA Tushar Checklis

Audiobooks Mortgage Required
Save Embed Share Print Docume

Magazines
Download Search document

Documents

Sheet Music

G.R. No. 150824

LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitioner,

vs.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

FACTS:
On September 26, 1969, an original certificate of title was issue in favor of Bugayong, which emanated
from a sales patent issued in Bugayong's name on September 22, 1969. The original certificate of title
was cancelled and was replaced by 4 transfer certificate of titles, all in the name of Bugayong. Bugayong
then sold all 4 lots to different people.

One of the lots was sold to the spouses Du. Afterwards, Du divided the land into 2 lots. One of the lots
was sold to Lourdes Farms, Inc., who then mortgaged the property to Land Bank of the Philippines.

The validity of the original certificate of title was then question by some residents of the land who filed a
formal petition before the Bureau of Lands. The Bureau of Lands found out that at the time the sales
patent was issued to Bugayong, the land was still classified as a forest zone; it was declared as alienable
and disposable land only on March 25, 1981.

The Bureau of Lands instituted a complaint against Bugayong and other present owners and mortgagees
of the land, such as Lourdes Farms, Inc. and the latter's mortgagee, petitioner LBP. the RTC and the CA
Ruled against LBP. Hence, this petition

Issues:
This document is...
Whether or not the LBP has a valid interest over the land as a mortgagee
Readorbooks,
not thereaudiobooks,
was impairment and more
Related
Whether
titles
Scribd
of contracts
Useful Not useful
Whther or not LBP is entitled to a cross claim
½ View
GET — On the App Store
Ruling
The contention that LBP has an interest over the subject land as a mortgagee has no merit. The
mortgagor, Lourdes Farms, Inc. from which LBP supposedly obtained its alleged interest has never been
the owner of the mortgaged land. Acquisition of the subject land by Lourdes Farms, Inc. is legally
impossible as the land was released as alienable and disposable only on March 25, 1981. Hence, LBP
acquired no rights over the land. Since Lourdes Farms, Inc. is not the owner of the land, it does not have
the capacity to mortgage it to LBP. mortgagees of non-disposable lands, titles to which were
erroneously issued, acquire no protection under the Land Registration Law

The constitutional guarantee of non-impairment of contracts may not likewise be used by LBP to
validate its interest over the land as mortgagee. The State's restraint upon the right to have an interest

Deed of Sale With TPA Tushar Checklist of manor mission

or ownership over forest lands does not violate the constitutional guarantee of non-impairment of
A and B are c
contracts. Said restraint is a valid exercise of the police power of the State. Preservation of our forest
Mortgagelands could entail intrusion upon contractual rights
Required… trustby
as in this case but it is justified deed typed
the Latin maxims
Salus populi est suprema lex and Sic utere tuo ut Documents for which call for the subordination of
alienum non laedas,
individual interests to the benefit of the greater Permits
number.

You're reading a preview. Unlock full access with a free trial. Download
Page 2 is not shown in this preview. With Free
Trial

It may be true that Lourdes Farms, Inc. still has an obligation to LBP but We cannot make a ruling
regarding the same for lack of factual basis. There is no evidence-taking on the cross-claim. No evidence
was adduced before the RTC or the CA regarding it. No factual finding or ruling was made by the RTC or
the CA about it.

It may be true that Lourdes Farms, Inc. still has an obligation to LBP but We cannot make a ruling
regarding the same for lack of factual basis. There is no evidence-taking on the cross-claim. No evidence
was adduced before the RTC or the CA regarding it. No factual finding or ruling was made by the RTC or
the CA about it.
You're Reading a Preview
Unlock full access with a free trial.

Download With Free Trial

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.

Read Free For 30 Days

No Commitment. Cancel anytime.

Share this document

Related Interests

Police Power (United States Constitutional Law) Mortgage Law

Civil Law (Common Law) Property Law Law And Economics

Documents Similar To LBP vs People

Deed of Sale With TPA Tushar Checklist of Required manor m

Mortgage UPLOADED BY Documents for… deed type
UPLOADED BY Tushar Saxena Permits
UPLOADED BY UPLOADED
cess_rmt jcool678 api-247

More From Julian Duba

Case Digests.docx Barbulescu v G.R. No. 107135 Barqs

UPLOADED BY Romania UPLOADED BY UPLOADED
Julian Duba UPLOADED BY Julian Duba Julian D
Julian Duba

ABOUT SUPPORT LEGAL

About Scribd Help / FAQ Terms

Press Accessibility Privacy

Our blog Purchase help Copyright

Join our team! AdChoices

Contact Us Publishers

Invite Friends

Gifts

Copyright © 2019 Scribd Inc. . Browse Books . Site Directory . Site Language: English