Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Clinical Study
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: We explored the influence of antidepressant therapy on blood pressure and quality of life in elderly
Received 20 December 2014 patients with hypertension. Depression occurs at a higher rate in patients with hypertension than in
Accepted 23 March 2015 the normal population. It has been reported that depressive symptoms lead to poorer hypertension con-
Available online xxxx
trol, resulting in the development of complications. We conducted a randomized, parallel group study. A
total of 70 elderly patients with hypertension in the period of August 2008 to March 2011 were divided
Keywords: into two groups based on their antihypertensive therapy, a control group (amlodipine, 5 mg daily; n = 35)
Antidepressants
and a therapy group (amlodipine, 5 mg daily; citalopram, 20 mg daily; n = 35). We compared 24 hour,
Depression
Elderly
daytime, and nighttime measurements of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, in addition to quality
Hypertension of life, assessed using the Hamilton rating scale for depression, and a 36 item Short Form quality of life
Quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). Both groups were followed for 3 months. At the end of 3 months, all blood pres-
sure levels were significantly lower in the therapy group than in the control group. The other scores (with
the exception of the physical function subcategory of the SF-36 quality of life scale) were significantly
higher. Our study indicates that clinicians should be aware of depressive symptoms in elderly patients
with hypertension, and should consider antidepressant therapy in these patients.
Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.067
0967-5868/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Fu W et al. Antidepressant medication can improve hypertension in elderly patients with depression. J Clin Neurosci
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.067
2 W. Fu et al. / Journal of Clinical Neuroscience xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
hypertension and depression. All the participants were either inpa- sure (DBP) P 90 mmHg, current treatment with antihypertensive
tients or outpatients for the management of hypertension, and medication, or a self-reported diagnosis of hypertension.
they did not take antihypertensive medication.
The study exclusion criteria were patients with secondary
2.5. Neuropsychological testing
hypertension, malignant tumors, significant suicidal risk, unstable
physical disorders, dementia, neurological disorders that were sig-
Neuropsychological testing was conducted using the HAMD
nificantly affecting the central nervous system function (including
questionnaire, administered to patients in the presence of two
a history of seizures), a lifetime history of any organic mental dis-
physicians using the generally accepted method of conversation
order, psychotic disorder or mania, substance abuse or dependence
and observation.
within the previous 6 months, clinical or laboratory evidence of
hypothyroidism without adequate and stable replacement, Parkin-
son’s disease, a family history of mental illness, and antipsychotic 2.6. QOL
medications.
The SF-36 scale was used to assess eight areas of QOL including
physical function, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vital-
2.2. Study design
ity, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. Higher
scores indicated a better QOL.
We conducted a randomized, parallel group study. All study
participants underwent a standardized clinical assessment which
included medical history, physical and neurological examinations, 2.7. Statistical analyses
Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD) tests, psychometric
evaluations, an electrocardiogram, complete blood count, urinaly- The statistical analyses were conducted with the paired t-test
sis, blood chemistry screening, and thyroid function tests. The using SPSS software (version 12.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY,
patients were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group USA). The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
(n = 35), which received conventional medical treatment with The non-normal distributed data were analyzed using the rank
amlodipine capsules (5 mg daily) for hypertension, and a case sum test method. Any differences with a p value <0.05 were con-
group (n = 35), which received conventional amlodipine treatment sidered statistically significant.
supplemented with citalopram (20 mg daily). The patients in both
groups were followed for 3 months. The assignments to the control
or case group were based on a computer-generated randomization 3. Results
list which was prepared by an independent statistician who was
not involved in the remainder of the study. The statistician respon- 3.1. Comparison of common factors between the two groups
sible for statistical analyses was blinded to the study group alloca-
tions throughout the study. The primary end point of the current We enrolled a total of 70 elderly patients (mean age
study was an improved QOL. The study was approved by the Ethics 72.00 ± 7.00 years) with hypertension and depression. The patient
Committee of Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, China response and data recovery rates were 100% at baseline, and the
and all participants provided written informed consent to partici- rate of loss to follow-up was 5.6%. Comparisons between the two
pate. The case intervention patients were blinded to the interven- groups in terms of age, sex, duration of hypertension, body mass
tion and the purpose of the study, and the assessors of the HAMD index, blood pressure, depression symptoms, and QOL are shown
and the 36 item Short Form quality if life questionnaire (SF-36) in Table 1. There were no significant differences in these parame-
were blinded to which group the patient had been allocated to. ters between the groups.
The study participants received a follow-up phone call every
2 weeks to inquire about matters that needed attention, provide
3.2. Comparison of blood pressure before and after treatment
reminders, and follow-up on topics that had been discussed in
the previous calls. Each participant also had a clinical visit in each
Prior to treatment, the differences in blood pressure of the con-
of the first 2 months. At the end of the third month, a clinical
trol and case groups were not statistically significant (Fig. 1). After
follow-up visit was conducted during which the patient received
treatment, the mean blood pressure in both groups was signifi-
a physical examination that included blood pressure, HAMD and
cantly decreased (p < 0.05). Additionally, the blood pressure of
SF-36 tests, which were evaluated by trained physicians.
the case group following treatment was significantly lower than
that of the control group (p < 0.05).
2.3. Data collection
All data were collected on standardized study forms according 3.3. Comparison of depression symptoms before and after treatment
to documented procedures by uniformly trained physicians. Two
individual physicians entered the study data into a clinical data- There was no significant difference between the HAMD scores
base. The data were then checked by another physician. Data qual- of the control and case groups prior to treatment (Fig. 2). However,
ity was ensured through standard data checks, and losses to following treatment, the HAMD scores in the case group were sig-
follow-up were balanced across the two groups. nificantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05).
2.4. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 3.4. Comparison of QOL scores before and after treatment
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was conducted by a There was no significant difference between the QOL scores in
non-invasive blood pressure detection instrument. Systolic blood the control and case groups prior to treatment (Fig. 3). After treat-
pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded, ment, with the exception of physical function, all dimensions of
24 hour, daytime and nighttime. Hypertension was defined as QOL in the case group were significantly higher than those of the
SBP P 140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), diastolic blood pres- control group (p < 0.05).
Please cite this article in press as: Fu W et al. Antidepressant medication can improve hypertension in elderly patients with depression. J Clin Neurosci
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.067
W. Fu et al. / Journal of Clinical Neuroscience xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 3
Fig. 1. Comparison of blood pressure before and after treatment. The values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. ⁄Significantly different from before treatment in
control group (p < 0.05), or significantly different from before treatment in the case group. #Significantly different from the control group before treatment, or significantly
different from the control group after treatment (p < 0.05). d = daytime, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, mmHg = millimeters of mercury, n = nighttime, SBP = systolic blood
pressure.
Please cite this article in press as: Fu W et al. Antidepressant medication can improve hypertension in elderly patients with depression. J Clin Neurosci
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.067
4 W. Fu et al. / Journal of Clinical Neuroscience xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
Fig. 2. Comparison of Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD) scores before and after treatment. All values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
#
Significantly different from the control group after treatment (p < 0.05).
Fig. 3. Comparison of quality of life (QOL) scores using the 36 item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire before and after treatment. The values are presented as the
mean ± standard deviation. #Significantly different from the control group after treatment (p < 0.05).
Please cite this article in press as: Fu W et al. Antidepressant medication can improve hypertension in elderly patients with depression. J Clin Neurosci
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.067
W. Fu et al. / Journal of Clinical Neuroscience xxx (2015) xxx–xxx 5
Acknowledgments [15] Choi Y, Park EC, Kim JH, et al. A change in social activity and depression among
Koreans aged 45 years and more: analysis of the Korean Longitudinal Study of
Aging (2006–2010). Int Psychogeriatr 2015;27:629–37.
This work was supported by the Beijing Municipal Health [16] Zivin K, Llewellyn DJ, Lang IA, et al. Depression among older adults in the
Bureau Research Fund (Jing 13-02), MOE Project of Humanities United States and England. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;18:1036–44.
[17] Hu HH, Li G, Arao T. The association of family social support, depression,
and Social Sciences (12YJCZH146), the Beijing Excellent Talent
anxiety and self-efficacy with specific hypertension self-care behaviours in
Fund (20140000204400001) and the Talent Training Program by Chinese local community. J Hum Hypertens 2015;29:198–203.
Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University. [18] Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. National Comorbidity Survey
Replication. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the
National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 2003;289:3095–105.
[19] Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Worldwide prevalence of
References hypertension: a systematic review. J Hypertens 2004;22:11–9.
[20] Firbank MJ, Lloyd AJ, Ferrier N, et al. A volumetric study of MRI signal
[1] Dines P, Hu W, Sajatovic M. Depression in later-life: an overview of assessment hyperintensities in late-life depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
and management. Psychiatr Danub 2014;26:78–84. 2004;12:606–12.
[2] Oztürk ZA, Yesil Y, Kuyumcu ME, et al. Association of depression and sleep [21] Wiehe M, Fuchs SC, Moreira LB, et al. Absence of association between
quality with complications of type 2 diabetes in geriatric patients. Aging Clin depression and hypertension: results of a prospectively designed population-
Exp Res 2014 [Epub ahead of print]. based study. J Hum Hypertens 2006;20:434–9.
[3] Mancia G, Giannattasio C. Diagnostic and therapeutic problems of isolated [22] Krousel-Wood MA, Muntner P, Islam T, et al. Barriers to and determinants of
systolic hypertension. J Hypertens 2015;33:33–43. medication adherence in hypertension management: perspective of the cohort
[4] Su SH, Xu W, Hai J, et al. Cognitive function, depression, anxiety and quality of study of medication adherence among older adults. Med Clin North Am
life in Chinese patients with untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J 2009;93:753–69.
Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1734–9. [23] Ong KL, Cheung BM, Man YB, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and
[5] Harpole LH, Williams JJ, Olsen MK, et al. Improving depression outcomes in control of hypertension among United States adults 1999–2004. Hypertension
older adults with comorbid medical illness. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2007;49:69–75.
2005;27:4–12. [24] Schoenthaler A, Ogedegbe G, Allegrante JP. Self-efficacy mediates the
[6] Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of relationship between depressive symptoms and medication adherence
disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 among hypertensive African Americans. Health Educ Behav 2009;36:127–37.
regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease [25] Krousel-Wood MA, Frohlich ED. Hypertension and depression: coexisting
Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2224–60. barriers to medication adherence. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)
[7] Kearney PM, Whelton M, Raynolds K, et al. Global trends of hypertension 2010;12:481–6.
analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005;365:217–23. [26] Chang-Quan H, Bi-Rong D, Zhen-Chan L, et al. Collaborative care interventions
[8] Kretchy IA, Owusu-Daaku FT, Danquah SA. Mental health in hypertension: for depression in the elderly: a systematic review of randomized controlled
assessing symptoms of anxiety, depression and stress on anti-hypertensive trials. J Investig Med 2009;57:446–55.
medication adherence. Int J Ment Health Syst 2014;8:25. [27] Fujishima M, Maikusa N, Nakamura K, et al. Mild cognitive impairment, poor
[9] Scalco AZ, Scalco MZ, Azul JB, et al. Hypertension and depression. Clinics (Sao episodic memory, and late-life depression are associated with cerebral cortical
Paulo) 2005;60:241–50. thinning and increased white matter hyperintensities. Front Aging Neurosci
[10] Kulkarni S, O’Farrell I, Erasi M, et al. Stress and hypertension. WMJ 2014;6:306.
1998;97:34–8. [28] Adriaensen W, Matheï C, Vaes B, et al. Interleukin-6 predicts short-term global
[11] Long J, Duan G, Tian W, et al. Hypertension and risk of depression in the functional decline in the oldest old: results from the BELFRAIL study. Age
elderly: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Hum Hypertens 2014. (Dordr) 2014;36:9723.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2014.112 [Epub ahead of print]. [29] Levandovski R, Pfaffenseller B, Carissimi A, et al. The effect of sunlight
[12] Shinagawa M, Otsuda K, Murakami S, et al. Seven-day (24-h) ambulatory blood exposure on interleukin-6 levels in depressive and non-depressive subjects.
pressure monitoring, self-reported depression and quality of life scores. Blood BMC Psychiatry 2013;13:75.
Press Monit 2002;7:69–76. [30] Licht CM, de Geus EJ, van Dyck R, et al. The association between anxiety
[13] Scalco AZ, Scalco MZ, Azul JB, et al. Hypertension and depression. Clinics (Sao disorders and heart rate variability in the Netherlands Study of Depression and
Paulo) 2005;60:241–50. Anxiety (NESDA). Psychosom Med 2009;71:508–18.
[14] Scuteri A, Spazzafumo L, Cipriani L, et al. Depression, hypertension, and [31] Licht CM, de Geus EJ, Seldenrijk A, et al. Depression is associated with
comorbidity: disentangling their specific effect on disability and cognitive decreased blood pressure, but antidepressant use increases the risk for
impairment in older subjects. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;52:253–7. hypertension. Hypertension 2009;53:631–8.
Please cite this article in press as: Fu W et al. Antidepressant medication can improve hypertension in elderly patients with depression. J Clin Neurosci
(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.067