Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Updated 11/26/2018
Adapt to Your Exam
Forward
price underlying
Guarantee/lock in
Short Obligation to sell at
Short F%," − S" F%," − S" ∞ F%," sale price of
Forward the forward price
underlying
Right (but not Insurance against
max [0, S" − K]
Long Call obligation) to buy Long max [0, S" − K] AV(Prem. ) ∞ high underlying
− AV(Prem. )
at the strike price price
Call
Naked Writing vs. Covered Writing Graphing Payoffs from First Principles
• If an option writer does not have an offsetting position in the underlying Create a payoff table separated by the strike regions, and then graph the total
asset, then the option position is said to be naked. payoff in each region accordingly.
• If an option writer has an offsetting position in the underlying asset, then Shortcut Method for Graphing the Payoff of All Calls or All Puts
the option position is said to be covered.
• For calls, go left-to-right on the payoff diagram, and evaluate the slope of
Floor, Cap, Covered Call, Covered Put the payoff diagram at each strike price.
Key Relationship: Call – Put = Stock – Bond Going left-to-right means that a positive slope is one that increases left-
Rearranging, we have: to-right, and a negative slope is one that decreases left-to-right.
• Floor = + Stock + Put (guarantee a minimum selling price for stock) • For puts, go right-to-left on the payoff diagram, and evaluate the slope of
• Write a covered put = – Floor = – Stock – Put the payoff diagram at each strike price.
• Cap = – Stock + Call (guarantee a maximum purchase price for stock) Going right-to-left means that a positive slope is one that increases right-
• Write a covered call = – Cap = + Stock – Call to-left, and a negative slope is one that decreases right-to-left.
Ratio Spread Collar Collared Stock
Long and short an unequal number of calls/puts Long put (K1) + Short call (K2), K1 < K2 Long collar + Long stock
with different strike prices
Straddle Strangle Butterfly Spread (Symmetric/Asymmetric)
Long put (K) + Long call (K) Long put (K1) + Long call (K2), K1 < K2 Buy high- and low-strike options. Sell middle-
strike option. Quantity sold = Quantity bought.
Example - For 3 strike prices 30, 43, 46:
• Buy 46 − 43 = 3 options with strike 30
• Buy 43 − 30 = 13 options with strike 46
• Sell 46 − 30 = 16 options with strike 43
Any multiple of (buy 3, sell 16, buy 13) would
work.
𝐏𝐏
• Margin call: If the margin balance falls below Call
Dividend Structure 𝐅𝐅𝐭𝐭,𝐓𝐓 (𝐒𝐒) the maintenance margin, then the investor will C(K_ ) ≥ C(K Ü ) ≥ C(K á)
No Divs SE get a request for an additional margin deposit. C(K_ ) − C(K Ü ) ≤ K Ü − K_
The investor has to add more funds to bring the European: C(K_) − C(K Ü) ≤ PV(K Ü − K_)
Discrete Divs SE − PVE," (Divs) margin balance back to the initial margin. C(K_ ) − C(K Ü ) C(K Ü ) − C(K á )
≥
Continuous Divs SE eNS("NE) K Ü − K_ Ká − KÜ
PUT-CALL PARITY (PCP)
PUT-CALL PARITY (PCP) Put
Dividend Structure 𝐅𝐅𝐭𝐭,𝐓𝐓 (𝐒𝐒) P(K_ ) ≤ P(K Ü ) ≤ P(K á )
PCP for Stocks P(K Ü ) − P(K_ ) ≤ K Ü − K_
No Divs SE e>("NE) ? (S)
C(S, K) − P(S, K) = FE," − KeN>("NE) European: P(K Ü ) − P(K_ ) ≤ PV(K Ü − K_ )
Discrete Divs SE e>("NE) − AVE,"(Divs) P(K Ü ) − P(K_ ) P(K á ) − P(K Ü)
PCP for Futures ≤
C(F, K) − P(F, K) = FeN>("NE) − KeN>("NE) K Ü − K_ Ká − KÜ
Continuous Divs SE e(>NS)("NE)
Synthetic short forward is the opposite, created by: C(A, B) − P(A, B) = ? (A)
FE," ? (B)
− FE,"
• selling a stock and lending money (i.e., buying a C(A, B) = P(B, A) BINOMIAL MODEL
BINOMIAL MODEL
bond), or
PCP for Currency Options Option Pricing: Replicating Portfolio
• selling a call and buying a put at the same strike.
Use the generalized PCP for exchange option. An option can be replicated by buying Δ shares
Arbitrage of the underlying stock and lending 𝐵𝐵 at the
A transaction which generates a positive cash flow For example, the prepaid forward price for 1 yen risk-free rate.
either today or in the future by simultaneous denominated in dollars is: V − Vt uVt − dV
Δ = eNS` ã å B = eN>` ã å
buying and selling of related assets, with no net $ S(u − d) u−d
? (¥1)
investment or risk. $F%," = qx% r (¥1eN>¥") = $x% eN>¥" V = ΔS + B
¥
Arbitrage strategy: “Buy Low, Sell High.”
Call Put
Alternatively:
Cash-and-Carry
S% → x% r → rt δ → rv
The actual forward is overpriced. Δ + −
Ct(f, K) − Pt(f, K) = x% eN>w" − KeN>x"
Short actual forward + Long synthetic forward
where x% is in d/f B − +
Reverse Cash-and-Carry
The actual forward is underpriced.
Breakeven expiration
ΔŒ − Δ? = eNS("NE)
If the price of the underlying stock changes by one Dynamic: Frequently buy/sell assets and/or
expÄ−δ(T − t)ÅN Õ (d_ ) derivatives with the goal of matching changes in
ΓŒ = Γ? = standard deviation over a short period of time,
Sσ√T − t then a delta-hedged portfolio does not produce the value of guarantee
NS("NE) N>("NE)
θŒ = δSe N(d_ ) − rKe N(dÜ) profits or losses.
KeN>("NE) N Õ (dÜ )σ
− Assuming the BS framework, given the current
2√T − t EXOTIC OPTIONS EXOTIC OPTIONS
N>("NE) NS("NE)
stock price, S, the two stock prices after a period of
θ? = θŒ + rKe − δSe h for which the market-maker would break even Asian Option
VegaŒ = Vega? = SeNS("NE) N Õ(d_ )√T − t are: A(S) arithmetic average
S‚ = „
ρŒ = (T − t)KeN>("NE) N(dÜ ) S ± Sσ√h G(S) geometric average
ρ? = −(T − t)KeN>("NE) N(−dÜ ) ‰
_
‰
ψŒ = −(T − t)SeNS("NE)N(d_) Multiple Greeks Hedging ∑‰
E¡_ SE
Δ≠E‘’ï = 1; all other Greeks of the stock = 0 A(S) = G(S) = ÂÊ SE Á
ψ? = (T − t)SeNS("NE) N(−d_ ) N
§ To hedge multiple Greeks, set the sum of the E¡_
eNœ /Ü G(S) ≤ A(S)
N Õ (x) = Greeks you are hedging to zero.
√2π
Average Price Average Strike
Risk Premium
The risk premium of an asset is defined as the ACTUARIAL-SPECIFIC RISK MANAGEMENT
ACTUARIAL-SPECIFIC RISK MANAGEMENT PayoffŒËÈÈ max[0, S‚ − K] max[0, S − S‚]
excess of the expected return of the asset over the Options Embedded in Insurance Products Payoff?E max[0, K − S‚] max[0, S‚ − S]
risk-free return: • A guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB)
• Risk Premium“”Eæ‘ñ = γ − r guarantees a minimum amount will be paid to a The value of an average price Asian option is less
• Risk Premium≠E‘’ï = α − r beneficiary when the policyholder dies. than or equal to the value of an otherwise
• A guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit equivalent ordinary option.
γ − r = Ω(α − r)
Δ?‘>E ⋅ S
ñ E[P(Tœ )] = fl P(t)f"‡ (t)dt
Ω?‘>E = = ⁄ ωæ Ωæ %
V?‘>E
æ¡_
γ?‘>E − r = Ω?‘>E (α − r)
Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
1
VEê` ≈ VE + ΔE ϵ + ΓE ϵÜ + θE h; ϵ = SEê` − SE
2
A compound put allows the owner to sell another Risk and Return of a Single Asset
= SE eNS("NE)N(d_) − XSE eN>("NE)N(dÜ ) ñ
option at the strike price. = SE •eNS("NE) N(d_ ) − XeN>("NE)N(dÜ )¶
E[R] = ⁄ pæ ⋅ R æ
The value of the underlying option at time t_ S
ln ì E î + (r − δ + 0.5σÜ)(T − t) ¡_
= VÄSEÍ , K, T − t_ Å XSE ñ
d_ =
The value of the compound call at time t_ σ√T − t Var[R] = E[(R æ − E[R])Ü ] = ⁄ pæ ⋅ (R æ − E[R])Ü
= max•0, VÄSEÍ , K, T − t_ Å − x¶ 1 ¡_
ln ì î + (r − δ + 0.5σÜ )(T − t) = E[RÜ ] − (E[R])Ü
= X
The value of the compound put at time t_
σ√T − t SD[R] = ÒVar[R]
= max•0, x − VÄSEÍ , K, T − t_ Ŷ
dÜ = d_ − σ√T − t Realized Returns
where
R Eê_ = Capital Gain + Div Yield
• K is the strike of the underlying option The time-0 value of the forward start option is:
? (S) PEê_ − PE DEê_
• x is the strike of the compound option V% = F%,E × •eNS("NE) N(d_) − XeN>("NE) N(dÜ)¶ = +
PE PE
• T is the maturity of the underlying option
Same analysis applies to a put option. Annual Realized Returns
• t_ is the maturity of the compound option
R = Ä1 + R Ú_ ÅÄ1 + R ÚÜ ÅÄ1 + R Úá ÅÄ1 + R ÚÛ Å − 1
Chooser Option
Put-call parity for compound options: For an option that allows the owner to choose at Average Annual Returns
" "
• CallonCall − PutonCall = C~> − xeN>EÍ time t whether the option will become a European 1 1
• CallonPut − PutonPut = P~> − xeN>EÍ Ù=
R ⁄ R E Var[R] = Ù) Ü
⁄(R E − R
call or put with strike K and expiring at time T: T T−1
E¡_ E¡_
Gap Option VE = max[C(SE , K, T − t), P(SE , K, T − t)] SD(R)
K_ : Strike Price Standard Error =
= eNS("NE) max•0, KeN(>NS)("NE) − SE ¶ √# Observations
K Ü : Trigger Price + C(SE , K, T − t)
95% confidence interval for the expected return
K_ determines the amount of the nonzero payoff. The time-0 value is: = Average return ± 2 ⋅ Standard Error
K Ü determines whether the option will have a V% = eNS("NE) ⋅ PÄS% , KeN(>NS)("NE) , tÅ + C(S% , K, T) SD(R)
=RÙ±2⋅
nonzero payoff. √# Observations
Lookback Option
0, S" ≤ K Ü An option whose payoff at expiration depends on Risk and Return of a Portfolio
PayoffÎË” ŒËÈÈ = „
S" − K _ , S" > K Ü the maximum or minimum of the stock price over R ? = x_ R _ + x Ü R Ü + ⋯ + x ñ R ñ
K _ − S" , S" < K Ü the life of the option. E[R ? ] = x_ E[R_ ] + xÜ E[R Ü ] + ⋯ + xñ E[R ñ ]
PayoffÎË” ?E = „
0, S" ≥ K Ü
Value of Investment i
Negative payoffs are possible. Type Payoff xæ = ; ∑xæ = 1
Total Portfolio Value
GapCall = S% e N(d_ ) − K_ eN>" N(dÜ )
NS" Cov•R æ , R ˜ ¶ = E•(R æ − E[R æ ])ÄR ˜ − E•R ˜ ¶Å¶
Standard lookback call S" − min(S) "
GapPut = K_ eN>" N(−dÜ ) − S% eNS" N(−d_ ) 1
Standard lookback put max(S) − S" = Ù æ ÅÄR ˜,E − R
⁄ÄR æ,E − R Ù ˜ Å
where d_ and dÜ are based on K Ü
Extrema lookback call max[0, max(S) − K] T−1
GapCall − GapPut = S% eNS" − K_ eN>" æ¡_
Extrema lookback put max[0, K − min(S)] = ρæ,˜ ⋅ σæ ⋅ σ˜
For a 2-stock portfolio:
Standard lookback options are known as lookback R ? = x_ R _ + x Ü R Ü
options with a floating strike price. σÜ? = x_Ü σ_Ü + xÜÜ σÜÜ + 2x_ xÜ Cov[R_ , R Ü ]
Extrema lookback options are known as lookback For a 3-stock portfolio:
options with a fixed strike price. R ? = x_ R _ + x Ü R Ü + x á R á
σÜ? = x_Ü σ_Ü + xÜÜ σÜÜ + xáÜ σÜá + 2x_ xÜ Cov[R_ , R Ü ]
+ 2x_ xá Cov[R_ , R á ]
+ 2xÜ xá Cov[R Ü , R á ]
the fraction of the total risk that is common to Capital Allocation Line (CAL) is a line representing
• (nÜ − n)/2 unique true covariance terms possible combinations from combining a risky
the portfolio.
Note that: • As long as the correlation is not +1, the volatility portfolio and a risk-free asset:
• Cov•R æ , R ˜ ¶ = Cov•R ˜ , R æ¶ = ρæ,˜ ⋅ σæ ⋅ σ˜ of the portfolio is always less than the weighted E[R ? ] − rv
E[R œ? ] = rv + q r σœ?
• Cov[R æ , R æ] = Var[R æ ] average volatility of the individual stocks. σ?
• Cov[aR_ + bR Ü , cR_ + dR Ü ] Mean-Variance Portfolio Theory
= acCov[R_ , R_ ] + adCov[R_ , R Ü ] Assumptions of Mean-Variance Analysis
+bcCov[R Ü , R_ ] + bdCov[R Ü , R Ü]
• All investors are risk-averse.
= acVar[R_] + adCov[R_ , R Ü]
• The expected returns, variances, and
+bcCov[R Ü , R_ ] + bdVar[R Ü ]
covariances of all assets are known. Risky
Diversification • To determine optimal portfolios, investors only Portfolio
Systematic risk need to know the expected returns, variances, Portfolio with x
• Also known as common, market, or non- and covariances of returns. invested in the
diversifiable risk. • There are no transactions costs or taxes. risky portfolio
• Fluctuations in a stock's return that are due to
Efficient Frontier
market-wide news.
• A portfolio is efficient if the portfolio offers the
Nonsystematic risk
highest level of expected return for a given level
• Also known as firm-specific, independent, • At the intercept, the portfolio only consists of
of volatility.
idiosyncratic, unique, or diversifiable risk. the risk-free asset.
• The portfolios that have the greatest expected
• Fluctuations in a stock's return that are due to • At point P, the portfolio only consists of risky
return for each level of volatility make up the
firm-specific news. assets.
efficient frontier.
Total risk = Systematic risk + Unsystematic risk • The line extending to the right of σ? represents
portfolios that invest more than 100% in the
Diversification reduces a portfolio's total risk by risky portfolio P. This is done by using leverage
averaging out nonsystematic fluctuations: (borrow money to invest). A portfolio that
• Investors can eliminate nonsystematic risk for consists of a short position in the risk-free asset
free by diversifying their portfolios. Thus, the is known as a levered portfolio.
risk premium for nonsystematic risk is zero.
zero risk. • If ρæ,˜ = −1, a zero-risk portfolio can be Capital Market Line (CML)
Portfolio constructed. • Assume investors have homogeneous
Volatility expectations.
o All investors have the same efficient frontier
25% of risky portfolios, and thus the same optimal
BA risky portfolio and CAL.
Elimination of
Expected Return
Corr. = -1
Non-Systematic 20% o Every investor will use the same optimal
Risk risky portfolio -- the market portfolio.
No Risk o When the market portfolio is used as the
15%
Systematic Corr. = +1 risky portfolio, the resulting CAL is CML.
Risk • The equation for CML is:
10%
E[R ¯ ] − rv
E[R œ¯ ] = rv + q r σœ¯
Number of Stocks WMT σ¯
5%
Observations: 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% • Only efficient portfolios plot on CML. Individual
• The diversification effect is most significant Volatility securities plot below this line.
initially.
Debt cost of capital / cost of debt / required individual debt securities because they are
return on debt: the rate of return that the debt traded less frequently than stocks.
holders require in order for them to contribute • The average beta for debt tends to be low.
their capital to the firm. However, the beta for debt does increase as the
credit rating decreases.
Beta
Definitions and Key Facts CML vs. SML Required Return on All-Equity Project
• Measures the sensitivity of the asset's return to If a project is financed purely with equity, the
CML SML
the market return. equity is said to be unlevered; otherwise, it is
• Is defined as the expected percent change in an
The x-axis is based on The x-axis is based on levered.
total risk systematic risk
asset's return given a 1% change in the market Assuming a project is financed entirely with
(i.e., volatility) (i.e., beta)
return. equity, we can estimate the project’s cost of
• The beta for a stock, on average, is around 1. Only holds for Holds for any security capital and beta based on the asset or unlevered
• Cyclical industries (tech, luxury goods) tend to efficient portfolios or combination of cost of capital and the beta of comparable firms:
have higher betas. (b/c all combinations securities
• Non-cyclical industries (utility, pharmaceutical) of the risk-free asset (b/c the CAPM can be All-
Comparable Levered
tend to have lower betas. and the market used to calculate the Equity
portfolio are efficient expected return for
Interpreting Beta Beta βµ = β~ βµ = w ~ β~ + w ¸ β¸
portfolios) any security)
• If β = 1, then the asset has the same systematic
Cost of
Alpha rµ = r~ rµ = w ~ r~ + w ¸ r¸
risk as the market. The asset will tend to go up Capital
and down the same percentage as the market. The difference between a security's expected
• If β > 1, then the asset has more systematic risk return and the required return (as predicted by A firm's enterprise value is the risk of the firm's
than the market. The asset will tend to go up the CAPM) is called alpha: underlying business operations that is separate
and down more than the market, on a αæ = E[R æ ] − ræ from its cash holdings. It is the combined market
percentage basis. = E[R æ ] − (rv + βæ [E[R ¯ïE ] − rv ]) value of the firm's equity and debt, less any excess
If the market portfolio is efficient, then all cash:
• If β < 1, then the asset has less systematic risk
securities are on the SML, and: V = E + D − C
than the market. The asset will tend to go up
E[R æ ] = ræ and αæ = 0
and down less than the market, on a percentage To determine the enterprise value, we use the
If the market portfolio is not efficient, then the
basis. firm's net debt:
securities will not all lie on the SML, and:
• If β = 0, then the asset’s return is uncorrelated Net debt
E[R æ ] ≠ ræ and αæ ≠ 0
with the market return. = Debt − Excess cash and short-term investments
Investors can improve the market portfolio by:
Calculating Beta • buying stocks whose E[R æ ] > ræ (i.e., αæ > 0) The beta of the firm's underlying business
Cov[R æ , R ¯ïE ] σæ • selling stocks whose E[R æ] < ræ (i.e., αæ < 0) enterprise is:
βæ = βæ,¯ïE = = ρæ,¯ïE ⋅
σܯïE σ¯ïE βµ = w ~ β~ + w ¸ β¸ + w Œ βŒ
ñ Required Return on New Investment
where:
Adding the new investment will increase the E
β? = ⁄ x æ βæ
Sharpe ratio of portfolio P if its expected return w~ =
æ¡_
exceeds its required return, defined as: E+D−C
D
Beta can be estimated using linear regression: r‰}˘ = rv + β‰}˘,? [E[R ? ] − rv ] w¸ =
R æ − rv = αæ + βæ (R ¯ïE − rv) + ϵæ E+D−C
In general, the beta of an asset i with respect to a −C
portfolio P is: wŒ =
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) E+D−C
ræ = E[R æ ] = rv + βæ [E[R ¯ïE ] − rv ] Cov[R æ , R ? ] σæ
βæ,? = = ρæ,? ⋅ Required Return on a Leveraged Project
• E[R ¯ïE ] − rv is the market risk premium or the σÜ? σ?
expected excess return of the market. If the project is financed with both equity and debt,
Expected Returns and the Efficient Portfolio
• E[R æ ] − rv or βæ [E[R ¯ïE ] − rv ] is the risk premium then use the weighted-average cost of capital
A portfolio is efficient if and only if the expected
for security i or the expected excess return of (WACC):
return of every available asset equals its required
security i. return. Thus, we have: r˛{ŒŒ = w~ r~ + w¸ r¸ (1 − τŒ )
Since βæ only captures systematic risk, E[R æ ] under E[R æ ] = ræ = rv + β}vv
æ [E[R }vv ] − rv ] = rµ − w ¸ r¸ τŒ
the CAPM is not influenced by nonsystematic risk.
Market Risk Premium where w¸ r¸ (1 − τŒ ) is the effective after-tax cost
Assumptions of the CAPM Two methods to estimate the market risk of debt.
• Investors can buy and sell all securities at premium:
Calendar/Time Anomalies
factor model is an alternative.
An efficient market is a market in which security • January effect: Returns have been higher in
• It considers more than one factor when prices adjust rapidly to reflect any new January (and lower in December) than in other
estimating the expected return. information, i.e., security prices reflect all past and months.
• An efficient portfolio can be constructed from present information. • Monday effect: Returns have been lower on
other well-diversified portfolios.
‰ Other Anomalies
weak-form efficient. • Siamese twins: Two stocks with claims to a
E[R æ ] = rv + ⁄ βúñ
æ (E[ R úñ ]) Strong-Form EMH common cash flow should be exposed to
ñ¡_
For a self-financing portfolio, the portfolio weights • There are only lucky and unlucky investors. No identical risks but perform differently.
sum to zero rather than one. one (not even company insiders) can • Political cycle effect: For a given political
consistently attain superior profits. administration, its first year and last year yield
Fama-French-Carhart (FFC) • Passive strategy is the best. higher returns than the years in between.
This model consists of 4 self-financing factor • A strong-form efficient market is also semi- • Stock split effect: Returns are higher before
portfolios: strong and weak-form efficient. and after the company announces the stock
• Market portfolio. Accounts for equity risk. Take Important Logic split.
a long position in the market portfolio and • If something supports the stronger form of the • Neglected firm effect: Lesser-known firms
finance itself with a short position in the risk- EMH, then it also supports the weaker forms. yield abnormally high returns.
free asset. Example: If something supports the semi- • Super Bowl effect: Historical data shows in the
• Small-minus-big (SMB) portfolio. Accounts strong form, then it must also support the year after the Super Bowl, the stock market is
for differences in company size based on market weak form. more likely to do better if an NFC team won and
capitalization. Buy small firms and finance itself • If something violates the weaker form of the worse if an AFC team won.
by short selling big firms. EMH, then it also violates the stronger forms. • Size effect: Small-cap companies have
• High-minus-low (HML) portfolio. Accounts for Example: If something violates the semi- outperformed large-cap companies on a risk-
differences in returns on value stocks and strong form, then it must also violate the adjusted basis.
growth stocks. Buy high book-to-market stocks strong form. • Value effect: Value stocks have consistently
(i.e., value stocks) and finance itself by short • However, the reverse is not necessarily true. outperformed growth stocks.
selling low book-to-market stocks (i.e., growth
stocks). Empirical Evidence Supporting EMH Bubbles also violate market efficiency. It happens
• Momentum. Accounts for the tendency of an Supporting Weak Form of EMH when the market value of the asset significantly
asset return to be positively correlated with the • Kendall found that prices followed a random deviates from its intrinsic value.
asset return from the previous year. Buy the top walk model, i.e., past stock prices have no The Efficiency of the Market Portfolio
30% stocks and finance itself by short selling bearing on future prices. Under the CAPM assumptions, the market portfolio
the bottom 30% stocks. • Brealey, Meyers, and Allen created a scatter plot is an efficient portfolio. All investors should hold
The FFC estimates the expected return as: for price changes of four stocks. the market portfolio (combined with risk-free
o No distinct pattern in the points, with the investments). This investment advice does not
E[R æ ] = rv + β¯ïE
æ (E[R ¯ïE ] − rv) + β≠¯Ô
æ E[R ≠¯Ô ] concentration of points around the origin. No depend on the quality of an investor’s
+ β!¯¥
æ E[R !¯¥ ] bias toward any quadrants. information or trading skill.
+ β?"_#"
æ E[R ?"_#" ] o Autocorrelation coefficients were close to 0.
where: • Poterba and Summers found that variance of The assumption of rational expectations is less
SMB = Small-minus-big portfolio multi-period change is approximately rigid than that of homogeneous expectations. If we
HML = High-minus-low portfolio proportional to number of periods. assume investors have rational expectations, then
PR1YR = Prior 1-year momentum portfolio all investors correctly interpret and use their own
Supporting Semi-Strong Form of EMH information, along with information from market
• 3 months prior to a takeover announcement, the prices and the trades of others.
stock price gradually increased. At the time of
companies that are in the same industry or are and below the mean: Sensitivity Analysis
geographically close. Explanations: Variance = E[(R − E[R])Ü ] • Change the input variables one at a time to see
• Investors suffer from familiarity bias, favoring
how sensitive NPV is to each variable. Using this
Semi-variance / Downside Semi-variance analysis, we can identify the most significant
investments in companies they are familiar
• Only cares about downside risk; ignores upside variables by their effect on the NPV.
with.
variability. • The range is the difference between the best-
• Investors have relative wealth concerns,
• The average of the squared deviations below case NPV and the worst-case NPV.
caring most about how their portfolio performs
the mean:
relative to their peers. Scenario Analysis
Semi-variance = E[min(0, R − E[R])Ü ]
• The sample semi-variance is: • Change several input variables at a time, then
1 calculate the NPV for each scenario. The greater
Semi-variance = ∑ min(0, R æ − E[R])Ü the dispersion in NPV across the given
n
scenarios, the higher the risk of the project.
• The underlying variables are interconnected.
probability distribution for each input variable. There are two major types of offerings:
2. Simulate random draws from the assumed Sizing Option • Primary offerings: New shares sold to raise
distribution for each input variable. new capital.
• Growth options give the company an option to
3. Given the inputs from Step 2, determine the make additional investments when it is • Secondary offerings: Existing shares sold by
value of the quantity of interest. optimistic about the future. current shareholders.
4. Repeat Steps 2 and 3 many times. • Abandonment options give the company an When issuing an IPO, the company and
5. Using the simulated values of the quantity of option to abandon the project when it is underwriter must decide on the best mechanism
interest, calculate the mean, variance, and other pessimistic about the future. to sell shares:
measures. • Best-efforts: Shares will be sold at the best
Inversion method: Set F† (x) = u. possible price. Usually used in smaller IPOs.
Decision tree is a graphical approach that • Venture Capital Firms 1. Underwriters typically manage an IPO and they
illustrates alternative decisions and potential • Private Equity Firms are important because they:
outcomes in an uncertain economy. • Institutional Investors o Market the IPO.
• Corporate Investors o Assist in required filings.
2 kinds of nodes in the decision tree:
o Ensure the stock’s liquidity after the IPO.
• The square node (■) is the decision node When a private company first sells equity, it
2. Companies must file a registration statement,
where you have control over the decision. typically issues preferred stock instead of common
which contains two main parts:
• The circular node (●) is the information node stock.
o Preliminary prospectus/red herring.
where you have no control over the outcome. A funding round occurs when a private company o Final prospectus.
Solving a Decision Tree: raises money. An initial funding round might start 3. A fair valuation of the company is performed by
with a "seed round," and then in later funding the underwriter through road show and book
• Work backwards from the end of the tree.
rounds the securities are named "Series A," "Series building.
• At each decision node, determine the optimal
B," etc. 4. The company will pay the IPO underwriters an
choice by comparing the PV of remaining
underwriting spread. After the IPO,
payoffs along each branch. Pre-Money and Post-Money Valuation
underwriters can protect themselves more
• At each information node, compute the expected • The value of the firm before a funding round is against losses by using the over-allotment
present value of the payoffs from the called the pre-money valuation. allocation or greenshoe provision.
subsequent branches. • The value of the firm after a funding round is 4 IPO Puzzles:
• Discount rate: called the post-money valuation. • The average IPO seems to be priced too low.
- If the true probability is given, use the cost of
σ = volatility of asset value • Liquidity preference The new debt that has lower seniority than
Div = free cash flow (FCF) lost from delay Liquidity preference = Multiplier × Initial inv existing debenture issues is called a subordinated
• Participation rights debenture.
Discount FCF at the cost of capital. • Seniority
Discount K at the risk-free rate. International bonds are classified into four broadly
• Anti-dilution protection defined categories:
Factors affecting the timing of investment: • Board membership • Domestic bonds – issued by local, bought by
• NPV of the investment foreign
There are two ways to exit from a private
o Without the timing option, invest today if • Foreign bonds – issued by foreign, bought by
company:
NPV of investing today is positive. local
• Acquisition
o With the timing option, invest today only if • Eurobonds – issued by local or foreign
• Public offering
NPV of investing today exceeds the value of
• Global bonds
the option of waiting, assuming the NPV is Initial Public Offering
positive. An initial public offering (IPO) is the first time a Corporate Debt: Private Debt
• Volatility company sells its stock to the public. Private debt is negotiated directly with a bank or a
o When huge uncertainty exists regarding the
small group of investors. It is cheaper to issue due
Advantages of IPO: to the absence of the cost of registration.
future value of the investment (i.e., high
• Greater liquidity
volatility), the option to wait is more 2 main types of private debt:
valuable. • Better access to capital
• Term loan
• Private placement
Municipal bond is issued by the state and local Financial Distress Costs
governments. A firm that fails to make its required payments to
debt holders is said to default on its debt.
There are also several types of municipal bonds
based on the source of funds that back them: After the firm defaults, the debt holders have
• Revenue bonds claims to the firm's assets through a legal process
• General obligation bonds called bankruptcy.
A private ABS can be backed by another ABS. This cost of equity increases. three components:
new ABS is known as a collateralized debt • As the amount of debt increases, the chance that 1. The costs of financial distress and
obligation (CDO). the firm will default increases, and subsequently bankruptcy, in the event they occur.
the cost of debt increases. o Direct costs – fees to outside professionals
Capital Structure Theory: Perfect Capital • Although both cost of debt and cost of equity like legal and accounting experts, consultants,
Markets increase as the company takes on more debt, appraisers, auctioneers, and investment
Perfect Capital Markets WACC remains unchanged because more weight bankers.
• Investors and firms can trade the same set of is placed on the lower-cost debt. o Indirect costs – loss of customers, loss of
securities at competitive market prices equal to
suppliers, loss of employees, loss of
the present value of their future cash flows. WACC with Multiple Securities:
receivables, fire sale of assets, inefficient
• No taxes, transaction costs, or issuance costs. rµ = r˛{ŒŒ = ⁄ wæ ⋅ ræ liquidation, cost to creditors.
• The financing and investment decisions are o Companies with marketable tangible assets
independent of each other. Levered and Unlevered Betas: (e.g., airlines, steel manufacturers) have
βµ = w ~ β~ + w ¸ β¸ lower costs of financial distress than
MM Proposition I D
• The total value of a firm is equal to the market β~ = βµ + (βµ − β¸ ) companies without these assets (e.g.,
E information technology companies,
value of the total cash flows generated by its
asset. Capital Structure Theory: Taxes and Financial companies in the service industry) because
• The value of a firm is unaffected by its choice of Distress Costs tangible assets can be sold relatively easily.
capital structure. Interest Tax Shield o Alternatives to bankruptcy designed to save
• The use of debt results in tax savings for the the direct costs:
• Changing a firm's capital structure merely
firm, which adds to the value of the firm. - Workout. The company negotiates
changes how the value of its assets is divided
• V¥ = Vµ + PV(Interest tax shield) directly with creditors and works out an
between debt and equity, but not the firm's total
Interest tax shield = Corp. Tax Rate × Int Pmt agreement.
value. - Prepackaged bankruptcy (or "prepack").
• V¥ = Vµ For a firm that borrows debt D and keeps the debt
The company will first create a
Homemade leverage: permanently, if the firm's marginal tax rate is τŒ , reorganization plan with the agreement of
• Investors can borrow or lend at no cost on their then the present value of the interest tax shield is: its primary creditors, and then file Chapter
own to achieve a capital structure different from PV(Interest tax shield) = τŒ ⋅ D 11 reorganization to implement the plan.
what the firm has chosen. WACC with Taxes 2. The probability of financial distress and
• If an investor adds $x worth of debt to the The firm’s effective after-tax WACC measures the bankruptcy occurring
capital structure, then he must reduce the required return to the firm’s investors after taking o Companies with a higher debt-to-equity ratio
equity by $x in order for the total firm’s value to into account the benefit of the interest tax shield: have a higher probability of bankruptcy.
remain unchanged. To determine x, set the r˛{ŒŒ = w~ r~ + w¸ r¸ (1 − τŒ ) o This probability increases when the volatility
adjusted current debt-equity ratio to equal the = w ~ r~ + w ¸ r¸ − w ¸ r¸ τ Œ of a firm's cash flows and asset values
target debt-equity ratio: increases.
D+x D where: o Firms with steady cash flows (e.g., utility
=ã å w~ r~ + w¸ r¸ = rµ = pretax WACC companies) can use high levels of debt and
E−x E "Ë>(}E
w¸ r¸ τŒ = reduction due to tax shield still have low probability of default.
the financial distress costs. Managers consider how their actions will be Poisson eN+ λñ
with mean λ Pr[N = n] =
perceived by investors in selecting financing n!
Capital Structure Theory: Agency Cost and
methods for new investments:
Asymmetric Information Exponential x
• Issuing equity is typically viewed as a negative F† (x) = 1 − exp ì− î
The Agency Costs of Leverage with mean θ θ
signal as managers tend to issue equity when
• Excessive risk-taking and asset substitution. they believe that the firm’s stock is overvalued. x−a
F† (x) =
A company replacing its low-risk assets with • Issuing more debt is typically viewed as a b−a
Uniform a+b
high-risk investments. Shareholders may positive signal as the company is taking on E[X] =
benefit from high-risk projects, even those with commitment to make timely interest and on [a, b] 2
negative NPV. (b − a)Ü
principal payments. Var[X] =
• Debt overhang or underinvestment. 12
Adverse selection has several implications for
Shareholders may be unwilling to finance new, Interest rate conversion:
equity issuance:
positive-NPV projects. i(|)
|E
• The stock price declines on the announcement (1 + i)E = q1 + = e>E
• Cashing out. When a firm faces financial m
r
of an equity issue.
distress, shareholders have an incentive to
liquidate assets at prices below their market • The stock price tends to rise prior to the Geometric series:
values and distribute the proceeds as dividends. announcement of an equity issue. First Term − First Omitted Term
• Firms tend to issue equity when information Sum =
1 − Common Ratio
Estimating the Debt Overhang asymmetries are minimized, such as
Equity holders will benefit from a new investment immediately after earnings announcement. Infinite geometric series:
requiring investment I only if: First Term
Pecking order hypothesis: Managers prefer to Sum =
NPV β¸ D 1 − Common Ratio
> make financing choices that send positive rather
I β~ E The PV of an annuity:
than negative signals to outside investors.
Who Bears the Agency Costs? 1 − vñ
The pecking order (from most favored to least añ| = v + v Ü + ⋯ + v ñ =
• When an unlevered firm issues new debt, equity i
favored financing option) 1
holders will ultimately bear the costs. a·| = v + v Ü + ⋯ =
• Internally generated equity (i.e., retained i
• Once a firm has debt already in place, some of
earnings)
the bankruptcy or agency costs from taking on The PV of an n-year annuity immediate with
• Debt
additional debt can fall on existing debt payments of 1, (1 + k), (1 + k)Ü , … , (1 + k)ñN_ :
• External equity (i.e., newly issued shares)
holders. 1+k ñ
Trade-Off Theory 1−ì î
The leverage ratchet effect explains that once PV = 1+i
Balance the value-enhancing effects of debt on a i−k
existing debt is in place:
firm's capital structure with the value-reducing
• Equity holders may have an incentive to take on The PV of a geometrically increasing perpetuity
effects.
more debt even if it reduces the firm value. immediate with payments of 1, (1 + k), (1 +
• Equity holders will not have an incentive to V¥ k)Ü , … :
decrease leverage by buying back debt even if it = Vµ + PV(Interest tax shield) 1
will increase the firm value. − PV(Financial distress costs) PV =
i−k
− PV(Agency costs of debt)
Reducing Agency Costs
+ PV(Agency benefits of debt)
To mitigate the agency costs of debt, firms and