Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
About BAM
The British Academy of Management (BAM) is a learned society dedicated to developing the
community of management academics. To find out more about BAM, please visit our website at
http://www.bam.ac.uk/
Training Needs Analysis: An Empirical
Study of the Abu Dhabi Police
1. ALI ALGHUFLI
Brunel University
Uxbridge
UB8 3PH
United Kingdom
Email: Ali.Ghufli@brunel.ac.uk
2. ZAHIR IRANI
1
Training Needs Analysis: An Empirical Study of the Abu Dhabi Police
Abstract
2
1.0. Introduction
The continuous socio-political and technological changes have challenged the organisations
to provide their employees with certain skills, knowledge and abilities (SKAs). A formal
approach for organizations to update employees’ acquisition of job-related SKAs is training
(Jamil and Som, 2007). Huang (2001) agreed that an educated and well-trained employee is a
prerequisite for an organization’s competitive advantage. Despite the importance of training
for improving organisation's performance and increased productivity, training itself must be
approached systematically. It should follow certain steps beginning with, an identification of
training needs, followed by the design and development of an appropriate training
programme to serve the needs, the implementation of the training programme, and finally the
evaluation of the training programme to determine whether the original needs had been
achieved. Execution on these steps is believed to ensure training effectiveness (Blanchard and
Thacker, 2012; Goldstein and Ford, 2002; and Noe, 2005). Miller and Osinski (2002) find
identifying training needs is the critical activity for any training and development function.
Thus, without this step, there can be no solid prognosis to diagnose if the whole training
process was correctly designed (Anderson, 1994; Bowman and Wilson, 2008, Goldstein,
1993).
Despite the importance of training needs analysis (TNA), very little empirical works found
that examine the factors that influence TNA process (Goldstein, 1993; Morano, 1973;
Wexley 1984). Moreover, most of the existing studies on TNA practices were conducted in
the first world such as, UK, Europe, USA and Far East. Due to cultural differences, the
findings of these studies might not reflect similar descriptions in the Middle East, and
especially in the UAE. Few studies were found in the Middle East (e.g. Abdalla and Al-
Homoud, 1995; Abu-Doleh, 2004; Altarawneh, 2005; Agnaia, 1996; Al-Ali, 1999; Qefel,
1998), however, the scope of these were not specific to TNA and were limited to only certain
manufacturing and service sectors. As a result the findings may not be generalized to describe
TNA practices in the UAE public sector such as Abu Dhabi Police (ADP). Therefore, the
main aim of this research is to investigate the current practice and application of TNA of
ADP. It seeks to understand the nature and the utilisation of TNA, and to find the barriers that
affect TNA in the ADP.
This study is considered as a step towards the theory relating to TNA in the UAE. The review
of the literature in the field of training and TNA has revealed the gaps and the need for more
empirical studies to be conducted. Therefore, this study integrates, refines, extends the
empirical work conducted in this field and fills some of the gaps in the literature.
3
Many authors stressed that the importance of TNA in planning and designing of any training
program (for e.g. Goldstein and Ford, 2002; McGehee and Thayer, 1961; Palmer, 2005; and
Reid and Barrington, 1997). When properly designed and administered, a TNA will provide a
detailed picture of an organization's skill, knowledge, and talent base while simultaneously
focusing attention to areas where training programs are most needed or, depending on the
nature of the business, required. This, in turn, permits the organization to allocate funds for
training and development where they will have the greatest impact, thereby providing a
positive return on the firm's investment. TNA, however, is much more systematic and
process-oriented and requires a greater degree of planning, co-ordination, and analysis
(McClelland, 1993). Therefore, McArdle (1998, p. 4) states that, “when properly done, a
TNA is a wise investment for the organization. It saves time, money and effort by working on
the right problems”. Furthermore, the idea behind TNA is that only when there is a match
between training needs and the content of training, beneficial outcomes to organizational
performance can be realized (Van Eerde, Tang and Talbot, 2008)
This study considers McGehee and Thayer’s O-T-P model as the theoretical basis, because it
is considered as the core framework for TNA in the academic literature and most of the
models have been developed based on this model, despite the fact that it was developed in
1961 (Holton, Bates and Naquin, 2000). It contains both future-oriented organization analysis
and present task and person analysis, which provide comprehensive needs analyses and
increase the likelihood of aligning training with organizational and individual needs.
Organizational analysis involves the examination of an organization’s mission and strategies
to identify training needs. It identifies the knowledge, skills and abilities that employees will
need for the future, as the organization and their job evolve or change. Task analysis
determines whether the SKAs required of each job in an organization contributes to the
achievement of the preset objectives. The TNA process continues to the third level whereby
the performance of each individual employee is assessed to determine whether he/she
performs according to the standards and if discrepancies occur, to decide whether training can
be used to close the gap. Thus, it focuses on how well employees perform their jobs and what
skills, abilities and knowledge they use to conduct those jobs.
TNA is very much a social process in the sense that it involves a wide range of people and a
number of inter-personal relationships, both within and outside the organization. Therefore,
4
the implications of TNA are different for different stakeholders due to their common as well
as conflicting interests and varying agendas and rationale for training and development in an
organization (Mishra, 2011). Leigh (1996) indicated that a number of people are likely to be
involved in identifying training needs of an organisation and of an individual. It is not only
the trainers who are involved in this process: personnel managers, line managers, supervisors
and job holders are also likely to have a part to play. Boydell and Leary (1996) assert that
learners/trainees should be involved in the TNA process whenever possible; surprisingly
however, they are often left out.
Even though, it was deliberated by theorists and researchers on the importance of TNA, it
was implied that many companies do not regard performing TNA as a priority (Anderson,
1994; Smith, 1999; Budhwar, Al-Yahmadi and Debrah, 2002, and Saeed, 2010). According
to Singal (2009), one of the causes for insufficient TNA practices in the organizations is the
lack of clarity on who is responsible for doing what. Agnaia (1996) found that mangers who
are in charge of assessing training needs are, usually, not specialists and they lack the
necessary skills and knowledge for performing their tasks. Abdullah (2009) also, stated that
the absence of needs assessment and analysis is due to lack of expertise. Agnaia (1996)
argues that assessing training needs by performance records by bosses may not reflect the
actual situation because this assessing is subject to family, nepotism, kinship and personal
relationships between the supervisors and employees. In addition, Abdalla and Al-Homoud
(1995) found that there are no specific procedures for determining training and educational
needs due to the lack of reliable information, turbulent political, economic and fast changing
social environments. Others Arab researchers argue that the lack of job descriptions, clear
performance appraisal and the approach used for assessing the development needs of
employees are impressionistic and generalised rather than systematic (Altarawneh, 2005).
However, these problems should be addressed in an appropriate manner.
3.0. Methodology
Data for this study was collected from Abu Dhabi Police in the UAE. The basis of this study
was phenomenology which adopted mainly an inductive qualitative approach to achieve the
aims and objectives. Both primary and secondary data were used in this study. For primary
data collection in this study, multiple methods of data collection were employed. Semi-
structured interviews were the main source of primary data, with the non-participant
observation and documentation. For collecting secondary data, various literatures were
reviewed, such as published books, journals, articles, research papers, monographs and
various websites of different organizations around the globe were included among them.
Various annual reports, official websites and official documents of the government and non-
government organizations were also reviewed for the same purpose.
Using a cross sectional design selected numbers of TNA stakeholders includes top
management officials, mid level officers, trainers, trainees, and policy makers were
interviewed. They were categorized into three groups: 1) policy makers, top management
officials; 2) academics and trainers; and 3) the trainees. All in a total 51 respondents from the
above three categories (20 from sample 1, 11 from sample 2 and 20 from sample 3), were
contacted for the interview, where semi-structured questionnaires were used. For analyzing
collected data, this study employed QDA software (NVivo) and directions from the
philosophical basis, phenomenology. Especially this study used interpretative
phenomenological analysis (IPA) method for analysing data to produce common or
contradictory themes and patters from the data, which are used as a basis of interpretation.
5
4.0. Findings and Discussions
The major findings from the study are discussed below:
6
industries (SMIs) in Malaysia had their HRD needs assessed and analysed. In her study,
Altarawneh (2005) found over half of the participants surveyed Jordanian banking
organisations declared that their organisations conduct TNA on a regular basis. Abu-Doleh,
(2004) found in his study in the Jordanian private and public sectors that more than two-
thirds (80%) of the private organisations and nearly 65 % of their counterparts in the public
sector report assessing their training and development needs on a regular basis. Undoubtedly,
conducting TNA on a regular basis does not always reflect the effectiveness of conducting
effective TNA process. In addition, training needs should not be assessed once a year; they
should be assessed at a variety of times depending on the organisation's needs and conditions.
7
Table 1: Methods of Assessing Training Needs
Training Need Assessment Methods Yes %
Performance appraisal information or results 17 85
Through a job descriptions for individuals in your 15 75
organization
Determination through special training committee 11 55
Group interviews with managers and supervisors 11 55
Direct Observation 10 50
Questionnaires 10 50
Skills, Knowledge, and Abilities (SKAs) tests 7 35
Personal face-to-face interviews with employees 4 20
N= 20, Source: Fieldwork
In this context, Altarawneh (2005) found that the most common used TNA methods in the
Jordon banking organisations were questionnaire, followed by interviewing employees' direct
managers or supervisors, while determination through a specialist training committee, job
description and performance records were the least used TNA method. Albahussain (2000)
found that direct observation was the most popular TNA used in surveyed Saudi
organisations, followed by formal performance appraisal reports, while the questionnaire was
the least used method. Agnaia (1996) found that the most common used by Libyan
companies were performance appraisals follow by questionnaire, while interviews was least
used methods.
Generally, the results show that to a certain extent all methods were used by Abu Dhabi
Police to identify needs of training of the employees. However, the most popular method
used was performance appraisal forms and job description. This finding is of no surprise as
performance appraisals are often considered the most common and widely used method in
TNA (Brown 2002; and Agnaia, 1996).
8
4.2.6 Perceptions on TNA Practices
All the respondents were asked the question relating to the overall perceptions of TNA
practices in Abu Dhabi Police. Results of the study suggest that overall perceptions of the
respondents regarding organisation’ TNA practices were high. Majority of the respondents
strongly agreed that: (95%) TNA process was emphasized in their organizations’ training
practices, (85%) The management of this organization believes that TNA is central for
improving the training effectiveness, TNA determines the ‘where’, ‘what’ and ‘who’
decisions of training, (80%) top managers are committed to TNA function and (75%) The
present volume of TNA is adequate to solve your current problems. This indicate that the
TNA stage had an important place in the organizations’ training practices, which was shown
in the study where Abu Dhabi Police had adopted some formal techniques and methods to
analyze their training needs and had followed certain proper procedures to choose training
participants.
9
4.3.1. Involvement of the Senior Managers in Selecting the Trainees
The respondents were asked to indicate whether they involve in selection of trainees. The
result of the interview shows that nearly 70% of the respondents said that they have direct
involvement.
This practice agrees with suggestions from Stanley (2002) who stated that immediate
supervisors were the most common and important sources of data in selecting employees for
training, because they are in the best position to observe the strengths and weaknesses of their
subordinates.
10
They also stated that the authority rarely made the programmes compulsory for the selected
employees. This indicated that it is not appropriate to force employees to attend the training
programmes which teach them what they may already know.
11
Table 3: Effectiveness of TNA
Effectiveness of TNA Yes %
Training was consciously linked to the Abu Dhabi Police’s strategic plans 20 95
Training objectives are in harmony with the Abu Dhabi Police's culture 19 95
You seek the support and commitment from Top management to provides 18 85
all the facilitation to training activities
The organization has a clear ongoing plan for training 18 85
The job description of the employee’s job was reviewed prior to deciding 17 85
on the training programme to be undertaken by the employee.
Policies and plans related to training are flexible and adaptable to changing 17 85
circumstances
Employees are motivated to participate in TNA process 17 85
The job related competency requirements were ranked according to their 17 85
importance
The current skill/competency level of employees was assessed prior to 17 85
deciding on the training programme to be undertaken by the employee
You have access to the Abu Dhabi Police’s objectives and strategies 16 80
You have decided on the desired competency level you were expected an 16 80
employee to reach after training
You determined the knowledge, skills and attitudes an employee must 16 80
have in order to perform the job successfully
You emphasize cost effectiveness training to assess the effectiveness of 15 75
training needs analysis
The relationship between the training staff/external training specialists and 14 70
line managers is based on mutual understanding and an exchange of ideas
to solve problems related to human resource development
Before considering training, you carefully assessed if the problem could 13 65
have been somewhere else (such as the work environment, the tools, and
reward systems)
N=31; Source: Fieldwork
The results clearly show that the TNA process of ADP is effective more as it links with
overall organization strategy.
12
ADP also lack trained personnel to identify training needs; top management ADP is only
interested on the results of the training.
On the basis of the aforementioned discussion and analysis, the following recommendations
are offered as a guide to reform the TNA process of ADP.
• TNA should to be Systematic and Strategic: TNA should to be systematic, linked and
derived from the overall organisational strategies, plans and policies, rather than being
a subject to the supervisors own viewpoints and personnel aspects or being piecemeal,
stand-alone activities, designed to react to the current organisational conditions. In
addition, TNA must be pragmatic otherwise it will be carried out without any rational
basis and will be doomed to failure. For this to be happened training managers should
have long-term training policies and plans and all the stakeholders of TNA at ADP
should be involved with the process. Moreover, it is urgent to relate simultaneously
managers’ needs analysis procedures with the analysis of their functional and
organizational needs.
• Training programmes should Link between Training and the Job Requirement:
Training programmes should be rooted in a careful identification of training needs so
that a linkage between training and the job requirement is viewed. Senior managers
and trainers should go beyond depending heavily on assessing training needs based on
performance appraisal and job description. Several methods should be involved in
choosing the appropriate procedure for TNA. For this to be happened, ADP should
develop a method that provides accurate, valid, and reliable information about the
requirement of training for the organisation.
13
• Effective Communication with the Stakeholders: More effective communication must
be established among the stakeholders to promote TNA, and especially the
involvement of the employees in the assessment of training needs. For this to be
happened, employees should participate in defining their needs, in terms of specific
and measurable knowledge requirements, skill development and attitude and
behavioural change. Top managers and line managers need to be committed to, and
supportive of TNA through being involved in formulating training strategies, plans
and objectives
References
ABDALLA, I.A. and AL-HOMOUD, M., 1995. A survey of management training and
development practices in the State of Kuwait. Journal of Management Development,
14(3), pp. 14-25.
ABDULLAH, H., 2009. Training Needs Assessment and Analysis: A Case of Malaysian
Manufacturing Firms. European Journal of Scientific Research, 37(3), pp. 351-360.
ABU-DOLEH, J., 2004. Management Training and Development Needs Assessment
Practices in the Jordanian Private and Public Sectors: Integrated or Isolated? Journal of
Transnational Management Development, 9(2-3), pp. 107-121.
AGNAIA, A.A., 1996. Assessment of management training needs and selection for training:
the case of Libyan companies. International Journal of Manpower, 17(3), pp. 31-51.
AL-ALI, A.A.S., 1999. Human Resource Development Training and Development Practices
and Related Organisational Factors in Kuwaiti Organisations. PhD edn. UK: University
of Bradford.
ALBAHUSSAIN, S.A., 2000. Human resource development: an investigation into the nature
and extent of training and development in the Saudi private manufacturing sector. PhD
edn. UK: University of Bradford.
ALTARAWNEH, I.I., 2005. Training and development effectiveness: practices, roles and
impacts on performance in Jordanian banking organisations. PhD edn. UK: University
of Huddersfield.
ANDERSON, G., 1994. A proactive model for training needs analysis. Journal of European
Industrial Training, 18(3), pp. 23-28.
BLANCHARD, P. and THACKER, J., 2012. Effective training. Systems, Strategies, and
Practices. International Edition. 5 edn. England: Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson
Education, Inc.
14
BOWMAN, J. and WILSON, J.P., 2008. Different roles, different perspectives: perceptions
about the purpose of training needs analysis. Industrial and Commercial Training, 40(1),
pp. 38-41.
BOYDELL, T. and LEARY, M., 1996. Identifying Training Needs. London: Chartered
Institute of Personnel and Development.
BROOKES, J., 1995. Training and Development Competence: a practical guide. London:
Kogan Page.
BROWN, J., 2002. Training Needs Assessment: A Must For Developing An Effective
Training Program. Public Personnel Management, 31(4), pp. 569-579.
BUDHWAR, P.S., AL–YAHMADI, S. and DEBRAH, Y., 2002. Human resource
development in the Sultanate of Oman. International Journal of Training and
Development, 6(3), pp. 198-215.
CAROLAN, M., D., 1993. Seven Steps for Back-to Basics Training, Nineties-Style. Trainin
g and Development Journal, 47(8), pp. 15-17.
GOLDSTEIN, I.L. and FORD, J.K., 2002. Training in organizations : needs assessment,
development, and evaluation. 4 edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
GOLDSTEIN, I.L., 1993. Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and
evaluation . 3 edn. CA, US: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
GUTHRIE, J.P. and SCHWOERER, C.E., 1994. Individual and contextual influences on
HOLTON III, E.F., BATES, R.A. and NAQUIN, S.S., 2000. Large-Scale Performance-
Driven Training Needs Assessment: A Case Study. Public personnel management,
29(2), pp. 249-267.
HUANG, T.C., 2001. The relation of training practices and organizational performance in
small and medium size enterprises. Education Training, 43(8/9), pp. 437-444.
JAMIL, R. and SOM, H., 2007. Training Needs Analysis: Practices of Top Companies in
Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(3), pp. 162-175.
LEIGH, D., 1996. Designing and Delivering Training for Groups. 2 edn. London: Kogan
Page.
MCARDLE, G.E.H., 1998. Conducting a needs analysis. Menlo Park, CA: Crisp Learning.
MCCLELLAND, S.B., 1993. Training Needs Assessment: An 'Open-systems' Application.
Journal of European Industrial Training, 17(1), pp. 12-17.
MCCLELLAND, S.D., 2002. A training needs assessment for the united way of Dunn County
Wisconsin. MSc edn. USA: University of Wisconsin-Stout.
MCGEHEE, W. and THAYER, P.W., 1961. Training in business and industry. New York:
Wiley.
MILLER, J.A. and OSINSKI, D.M., 2002. Training needs assessment. White Paper edn.
USA: Society For Human Resource Management (SHRM).
MISHRA, P.C., 2011. Models and Relevance of Training Needs Analysis for Effective
Design, Delivery and Evaluation of Training Activities and Improvement of
Organizational Performance. SAARANSH, 2(2), pp. 1-8.
MOORE, M.L. and DUTTON, P., 1978. Training needs analysis: Review and critique.
Academy of Management Review, 3(3), pp. 532-545.
MORANO, R., 1973. Determining organizational training needs. Personnel Psychology,
26(4), pp. 479-487.
NOE, R.A., 2005. Employee Training and Development. 3 edn. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
15
PALMER, R., 2005. The identification of learning needs. In: J.P. WILSON, ed, Human
resource development learning and training for individuals and organizations. 2 edn.
London: Kogan Page Ltd., pp. 137-155.
PATEL, L., 2010. State of the industry report. Alexandria, VA: American Society for
Training & Development.
QEFEL, M.A.E.B., 1998. Enhancing the training process in the public sector of the United
Arab Emirates with special reference to training needs assessment, objective
development, trainees selection and evaluation.
. PhD edn. UK: University of Glasgow.
REID, M.A. and BARRINGTON, H., 1997. Training interventions: Managing employee
development. 5 edn. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
SAEED, Z., 2010. Training: a Cost or an Investment? Depends upon the Way You Go! 2010
Oxford Business & Economics Conference (OBEC) 2010, St. Hugh’s College, Oxford
University.
SALAS, E., TANNENBAUM, S.I., KRAIGER, K. and SMITH-JENTSCH, K.A., 2012. The
Science of Training and Development in Organizations What Matters in Practice.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), pp. 74-101.
SIMS, R.R., 1990. An experiential learning approach to employee training systems. New
York, NY: Quorum Books.
SINGAL, A., 2009. A Stakeholder Based Approach to Manage the Training Process. Indian
Management Studies Journal, 13, pp. 103-122.
SMITH, A., 1999. International briefing 4 Training and development in Australia.
International Journal of Training and Development, 3(4), pp. 301-313.
STANLEY, T., 2002. Good Training Programs Don't Just Happen. Supervision, 63(6), pp. 8-
10.
STEADHAM, S.V., 1980. Learning to Select a Needs Assessment Strategy. Training and
development journal, 34(1), pp. 56-61.
TAYLOR, P.J., DRISCOLL, M.P.O. and BINNING, J.F., 1998. A new integrated framework
for training needs analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 8(2), pp. 29-50.
VAN EERDE, W., TANG, K.C. and TALBOT, G., 2008. The mediating role of training
utility in the relationship between training needs assessment and organizational
effectiveness. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), pp. 63-73.
WEXLEY, K.N., 1984. Personnel training. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1), pp. 519-
551.
WILKINS, S., 2002. International briefing 9: training and development in the United Arab
Emirates. International Journal of Training and Development, 5(2), pp. 153-165.
16