Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Compounding offence
9THSemester
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Acknowledgment........................................................................................... iii
2. Research Methodology................................................................................. iv
3. Case list........................................................................................................v
4. Abstract..........................................................................................................vii
5. Introduction................................................................................................... 1
6. statement of object and reasons.………………………………………..…..… 2
7. bibliography………………….……..………………………………………… 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I take this opportunity to express our humble gratitude and personal regards toMr.
ZEESHAN HASHMI or inspiring me and guiding me during the course of this project work and
also for his cooperation and guidance from time to time during the course of this project work
on the topic.
Jaipur
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Plan
The researchers have followed Doctrinal method.
Sources of Data:
The following secondary sources of data have been used in the project-
Case Study
Websites
Case Laws
Books
ABSTRACT
This project aims at introducing the concept of Amendments in rajasthan tenancy act, 1955
analyzing it. It deals with little is known about the process of human decomposition at death
scenes.Many of these cases specific environmental and geographical data, scene conditions,
victim details andsituational information, including the involvement of drugs and alcohol as well
as thecause and manner of death. This is currently the largest known retrospective study
ofhuman decomposition involving the highest number of cases and with the mostextensive
level of detail. The purpose of the research was to determine which variablesor combination of
variables are responsible for the relative speed or manner ofdecomposition and whether or not
environmental conditions or geographical location canbe used as an indicator of a specific
state of decomposition. It was determined that only9 of the 49 variables were responsible for
83% of the variance in the decompositionalscore in outdoor scenes. In relation to indoor
scenes, only three variables weredetermined to be influential and five within water scenes. Not
only the speed ofdecomposition was found to be different between water, outside and inside
scenes, butsome stages were absent or present depending on environmental conditions.
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Legal provisions regarding compounding of offences under section 320 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973.
If both the parties agree that there has been compromise, then the Court has to dispose
of the case in terms of that compromise and the petitioner is to be acquitted. If, on the
other hand, parties differ, then the Court has to call upon them to lead evidence and
then record a finding on such evidence.
The offences that may lawfully be compounded are those that are mentioned in Section
320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The offences other than those mentioned
cannot be compounded. The offences punishable laws other than the Penal Code are
not compoundable. Only the person named in the third column of Section 320 can
legally compound an offence under Section 320. Any person may set the criminal law in
motion, but it is only the person specified in the third column who can compound the
offence. A case may be compared at any time before sentence is pronounced even
whilst the Magistrate is writing the judgment.
The compounding of an offence signifies that the person against whom the offence has
been committed has received some gratification, not necessarily of a pecuniary
character, to act as an inducement for his desiring to abstain from a prosecution and
Section 320 provides that if the offence be compoundable, composition shall have the
effect of an acquittal.
The object of Section 320 of the Code is to promote friendliness between the parties so
that peace between them is restored.
Table:
person
column 1 of the
Table under sub-
section (2)
(2) The offences punishable under the Sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 specified
in the first two columns of the Table next following may, with the permission of the
Court before which any prosecution for such offence is pending, be compounded by the
persons mentioned in the third column of that Table.
Table
concealment or stolen.
disposal of stolen
property, knowing it
to be stolen, where
the value of the
stolen property does
not exceed two
thousand rupees.
damage caused is
loss or damage to a
private person.
or the Governor of a
State or the
Administrator of a
Union Territory or a
Minister in respect of
his conduct in the
discharge of his
public functions
when instituted upon
a complaint made by
the public
prosecutor.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books referred:
RAJASTHAN BARE ACT OF UNIVERSAL
Websites Referred:
http://www.WIKIPEDIEA.COM
.