Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 35

Horizontal & Vertical Curve Design

Jeff Wheeler, P.E.


Engineering
Branch
Background

¾ Sources for Road Geometry Design guidance


– Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Public Works
(MPW)
• Road and Highway Standards – March 2005
• Road and Highway Standards Supplement – March 2007
– AASHTO, Geometric Design of Roads & Highways
– Standard Engineer Handbook, 5th Ed. Ricketts & Loftin
¾ Code dealing with curve design
– MPW page 7 – Table 2 – Major Roads – Basic Geometric
Standards
– AASHTO, Chapter 3
– Standard Handbook, Chapter 16

1/5/2009 2
Why Emphasize Curve Design?

¾ Horizontal Curves
– Super elevation counteracts centripetal forces
– Side friction of tires may not be enough on aggregate surfaces
– Water or ice on the road reduces tire friction, hydroplaning
– Many vehicles (Jingle Trucks) have high centers of gravity
– Many drivers fail to observe posted speed limits

¾ Vertical Curves – Crest and Sag


– Adequate stopping distance crucial to driver & pedestrian safety
– Improving headlight distance and road visibility aids security
– Big impact on construction costs (cut and fill, culvert lengths)

¾ Proper Curve design can save thousands of lives!

1/5/2009 3
Typical Horizontal Curve?

1/5/2009 4
Typical Curve Cross Section

1/5/2009 5
Super Elevation Transition

1/5/2009 6
Typical Horizontal Curve

Design review:
1. Checks design speed
2. Checks design e
3. Checks design Lr
4. Checks design Lt
5. Checks curve widening

Vd = 50 kph

1/5/2009 7
AASHTO Super-elevation Table

MPW Interim Road and Highway Standards, paragraph IX (c) limits super elevation to 10%

1/5/2009 8
Check Rate of Super-elevation

1/5/2009 9
Super elevation is 9.2%

1/5/2009 10
Not quite this steep?

Talladega Super Speedway, e = 33%


1/5/2009 11
Check Minimum Transition Runoff Length

¾Lr = [(wn)(ed)] b

- w is lane width (here 3.5m)


- n is number of lanes rotated (here 1)
- ed is design super elevation rate (here 9.2%)
- b is adjustment factor for number of lanes
- is maximum relative gradient, in percent

Length of roadway required to change outside lane cross slope from flat to full e

1/5/2009 12
Adjustment Factor, b

Runoff lengthens as # of lanes


affected by transition increases

1/5/2009 13
Relative Gradient,
Change in longitudinal elevation during transition to super elevation

1/5/2009 14
Calculate Length of Transition Runoff, Lr

1/5/2009 15
Runoff Table

1/5/2009 16
Calculate Minimum Tangent Runout, Lt

¾Lt = (enc/ed) Lr
– enc is normal cross slope of road (2.5%)
– ed is design super elevation rate
– Lr is minimum length of runoff

Length required to change outside lane from normal cross slope rate to flat

1/5/2009 17
Calculate Length of Transition Runout, Lt

1/5/2009 18
Why are Lr and Lt important?
Typical Reverse Curve

Vd = 30 kph
1/5/2009 19
Overlap of Transition

1/5/2009 20
So, Designer must suggest…

1/5/2009 21
Check Curve Widening

1/5/2009 22
Check Curve Widening

Call out or show widened area


1/5/2009 23
Vertical Curves

1/5/2009 24
Typical Crest Curve

Review steps:
1. Check Math
2. Check K
against
AASHTO
design controls

1/5/2009 25
Typical Crest Curve – check Math

1/5/2009 26
Design Controls - Kcrest

1/5/2009 27
Evaluate K against Kcrest control

1/5/2009 28
Typical Sag Curve

Vd = 50 kph
1/5/2009 29
Typical Sag Curve – check Math

1/5/2009 30
Design Controls - Ksag

1/5/2009 31
Check K against Ksag control

1/5/2009 32
Presenting Data

Suggested Sample Curve Table

Would like to see Lr and Lt as well

1/5/2009 33
Questions?

Thanks for your attention

1/5/2009 34
Possible Next Topics - Civil
9Septic Tank and Leach Field Design
9Road Curve and Widening Design
¾Sanitary Sewer Design
¾Water System Design
¾Booster Pump Design
¾Water Tank Design
¾Well pump Design
¾Chlorination System Design
¾Hydro-pneumatic Tank Design
¾Grease Interceptor Design
¾Package Waste Water Treatment Plants
¾Full size Waste Water Treatment Plants

¾These subjects can be briefed by our sustaining members as well!


1/5/2009 35

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi