SLWW - Code of Operation

1.1. The name SUICIDE LETTER is given not only by its producer. It is mostly
given by its readers
1.1.1 Normally, the readers are not allowed of interpretation in public.
1.1.2 Because it is the format which is not allowed to be seen.
1.1.2.1 In some cases even read.

2.1 As usual, the format refers to the formats of the contouring formats and so
on until cognitive algebra dictates which format ought to be acted upon.
2.1.1 The formats that frame the Suicide Letters make it very difficult to
separate emotions from the literary sense of the Letter.
2.1.2 This elevates the letter to a meta-poetic production
2.1.3 Any- and everything written in them has poetic value.

2.2 The poetic value comes from its framing.

2.2.1 The poetic value comes from the suicidal impulse
2.2.1.1 The poetic value is Thanatophiliac
2.2.2 The execution of said impulses frames the writing as Poetry
2.2.3 After the Suicide the poetry is confronted with Death

2.3 The Death of the writer is processed differently by each individual

2.3.1 The poetical value of the letter is filtered by the individual relationship
towards the writer or the experiences the writer has had with this kind of
literary production
2.3.2 A literary analysis should take into count this multiple individualisms.
2.3.3 An analysis MUST be sensitive
2.3.4 The sensitive analysis considers its analyst.

2.4. The relationship of the analyst towards the Suicide Letter could be a
personal one
2.4.1 The analyst may have produced one.
2.4.2 If a suicide Letter was produces before the workshop then one must be
extremely cautious.
2.4.3 If this may be the case then one has to take into consideration the
preexistence of suicidal thoughts
2.4.4 Suicidal thoughts and its actual status have to be discussed by the
organizer with the analyst beforehand to prevent the reactivation or
facilitation of them.
2.4.5 The activation of suicidal thought may lead to catastrophic outcomes.
2.4.6 An actual Suicide MUST be prevented and avoided at all costs.
2.4.7 If some participant in the workshop feels uncomfortable, the workshop
MUST be ended
2.4.7.1 It is the task of the organizer to provide comfort.
2.4.8 The premature ending of a Workshop must not make someone feel guilty
2.4.8.1 The premature ending of a Workshop must be orchestrated by the
organizer in such a way that she/he can be the only one to blame for its
disruption.
2.5 The preparation of the organizer is of mayor importance .
2.5.1 The organizer MUST ask the participants about their personal relationship
towards Suicide Letters and suicidal thoughts before the workshop starts
2.5.2 If a potential participant has had suicidal thoughts or a intimate relation
towards suicide letters or suicide in general then it is the organizers
responsibility to talk about them with her/him and decide if she/he can
participate
2.5.3 If someone is seen as not-apt then it is the responsibility of the organizer
to NOT make her/him feel excluded

3.1 The outcome of the workshop should be that the participants write a
Suicide Letter
3.1.1 This should be made clear at the beginning of the workshop
3.1.2 If a participant expresses its unwillingness to do so then she or he should
be asked to leave the Workshop in order to create a comfortable and
trust-fullll atmosphere around the other participants.
3.1.3 If someone is asked to leave it is imperative that the organizer consults
her/him after

4.1 The interest in the medium and its therapeutic abilities comes from the
fact that they are so bound to its writers fate that they are automatically
bound to the realm of Thanatos.
4.1.1. A Suicide is made when the love for death is greater that the love towards
life
4.1.2 This evaluation and its outcome has different reasons and parameters in
each case, nonetheless death is always present whether it be as an
outcome or a strategy
4.1.2.1 an outcome in case of a successful suicide and a strategy when its
intention remains unfulfilled

4.2 The Suicide Letter Writing Workshop should encourage the production of
a fictive suicide letter in a supervised environment
4.2.1 The production of said text should unfold as a therapeutical experiment.
4.2.2 In this experiment, the participants, should be enabled to translate hidden
sorrows and insecurities.
4.2.2.1 Thus creating a reflective surface, opening new ways of self-criticism and
study

4.3 The Workshop should leave a sweet taste behind and nice memories to
remember :)