Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. Company history:
The K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs case study consists of the history of the company given at
the start. Reading it thoroughly will provide you with an understanding of the company's aims and
objectives. You will keep these in mind as any Harvard Business Case Solutions you provide will need
to be aligned with these.
3. Company culture:
Work culture in a company tells a lot about the workforce itself. You can understand this by going
through the instances involving employees that the HBR case study provides. This will be helpful in
understanding if the proposed case study solution will be accepted by the workforce and whether it
will consist of the prevailing culture in the company.
Another way how you can do the K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs financial analysis is through
financial modelling. Financial Analysis through financial modelling is done by:
Thus, it is a snapshot of the company and helps analysts assess whether the company's performance
has improved or deteriorated. It also gives an insight about its expected performance in future- whether
it will be going concern or not. K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs Financial analysis can, therefore,
give you a broader image of the company.
It takes into account the future value of money, thereby giving reliable results.
It considers the cost of capital in its calculations.
It gives the return in dollar terms simplifying decision making.
The formula that you will use to calculate K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs NPV will be as
follows:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows minus Initial Investment
Present Value of Future cash flows will be calculated as follows:
PV of CF= CF1/(1+r)^1 + CF2/(1+r)^2 + CF3/(1+r)^3 + …CFn/(1+r)^n
where CF = cash flows
r = cost of capital
n = total number of years.
Cash flows can be uniform or multiple. You can discount them by K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for
Dogs WACC as the discount rate to arrive at the present value figure. You can then use the resulting
figure to make your investment decision. The decision criteria would be as follows:
If Present Value of Cash Flows is greater than Initial Investment, you can accept the project.
If Present Value of Cash Flows is less than Initial Investment, you can reject the project.
Thus, calculation of K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs NPV will give you an insight into the value
generated if you invest in K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs. It is a very reliable tool to assess the
feasibility of an investment as it helps determine whether the cash flows generated will help yield a
positive return or not.
However, it would be better if you take various aspects under consideration. Thus, apart from
K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs’s NPV, you should also consider other capital budgeting
techniques like K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs’s IRR to evaluate and fine-tune your investment
decisions.
K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs DCF can also be calculated using the following formula:
DCF= CF1/(1+r)^1 + CF2/(1+r)^2 + CF3/(1+r)^3 + …CFn/(1+r)^n
In the formula:
1. By using a K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs Excel Spreadsheet: There are in-built
formulae for calculating IRR.
2. By using trial-and-error: For this, the following formula will be used:
K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs IRR impacts your finance case solution in the following ways:
1. Think about the order of the K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs xls worksheets in your
finance case solution
2. Use more K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs xls worksheets and tables as will divide the
data that you are looking at in sections.
3. Choose clarity overlooks
4. Keep your timeline consistent
5. Organise the information flow
6. Clarify your sources
The following tips and bits should be kept in mind while preparing your finance case solution in a
K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs xls spreadsheet:
1. Liquidity Ratios: Liquidity ratios gauge a company's ability to pay off its short-term debt.
These include the current ratio, quick ratio, and working capital ratio.
2. Solvency ratios: Solvency ratios match a company's debt levels with its assets, equity, and
earnings. These include the debt-equity ratio, debt-assets ratio, and interest coverage ratio.
3. Profitability Ratios: These show how effectively a company can generate profits through its
operations. Profit margin, return on assets, return on equity, return on capital employed, and
gross margin ratio is examples of profitability ratios.
4. Efficiency ratios: Efficiency ratios analyse how efficiently a company uses its assets and
liabilities to boost sales and increase profits.
5. Coverage Ratios: These ratios measure a company's ability to make the interest payments and
other obligations associated with its debts. Examples include times interest earned ratio and
debt-service coverage ratio.
6. Market Prospect Ratios: These include dividend yield, P/E ratio, earnings per share, and
dividend payout ratio.
FCFF
FCFE
DDM
Comparable
o DDM is an appropriate method if dividends are being paid to shareholders and the
dividends paid are in line with the earnings of the company.
o FCFF is used when the company has a combination of debt and equity financing.
o FCFE, on the other hand, shows the cash flow available to equity holders only.
These three methods explained above are very commonly used to calculate the value of the firm.
Investment decisions are undertaken by the value derived.
K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs calculations for projected cash flows and growth rates are taken
under consideration to come up with the value of firm and value of equity. These figures are used to
determine the net worth of the business. Net worth is a very important concept when solving any
finance and accounting case study as it gives a deep insight into the company's potential to perform in
future.
Alternative Solutions
After doing your case study analysis, you move to the next step, which is identifying alternative
solutions. These will be other possibilities of Harvard Business case solutions that you can choose
from. For this, you must look at the K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs case analysis in different
ways and find a new perspective that you haven't thought of before.
Once you have listed or mapped alternatives, be open to their possibilities. Work on those that:
After listing possible options, evaluate them without prejudice, and check if enough resources are
available for implementation and if the company workforce would accept it.
For ease of deciding the best K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs case solution, you can rate them
on numerous aspects, such as:
Feasibility
Suitability
Flexibility
Implementation
Once you have read the K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs HBR case study and have started
working your way towards K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs Case Solution, you need to be clear
about different financial concepts. Your Mondavi case answers should reflect your understanding of
the K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs Case Study.
You should be clear about the advantages, disadvantages and method of each financial analysis
technique. Knowing formulas is also very essential or else you will mess up with your analysis.
Therefore, you need to be mindful of the financial analysis method you are implementing to write your
K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs case study solution. It should closely align with the business
structure and the financials as mentioned in the K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs case memo.
You can also refer to K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs Harvard case to have a better understanding
and a clearer picture so that you implement the best strategy. There are a number of benefits if you
keep a wide range of financial analysis tools at your fingertips.
Your K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs HBR Case Solution would be quite accurate
You will have an option to choose from different methods, thus helping you choose the best
strategy.
You need to make sure that it is not generic and it will help in increasing company value
It is in line with the case study analysis you have conducted
The K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs calculations you have done support what you are
recommending
It should be clear, concise and free of complexities
Also, adding an action plan for your recommendation further strengthens your K9FuelBar An Energy
Treat for Dogs HBR case study argument. Thus, your action plan should be consistent with the
recommendation you are giving to support your K9FuelBar An Energy Treat for Dogs financial
analysis. It is essential to have all these three things correlated to have a better coherence in your
argument presented in your case study analysis and solution which will be a part of K9FuelBar An
Energy Treat for Dogs Case Answer.
References
Arbaugh, W. (2000). Windows of vulnerability: A case study analysis. Retrieved from Colorado State
University Web site: http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~cs635/Windows_of_Vulnerability.pdf
Choi, J. J., Ju, M., Kotabe, M., Trigeorgis, L., & Zhang, X. T. (2018). Flexibility as firm value driver:
Evidence from offshore outsourcing. Global Strategy Journal, 8(2), 351-376.
DeBoeuf, D., Lee, H., Johnson, D., & Masharuev, M. (2018). Purchasing power return, a new paradigm
of capital investment appraisal. Managerial Finance, 44(2), 241-256.
Delaney, C. J., Rich, S. P., & Rose, J. T. (2016). A Paradox within the Time Value of Money: A Critical
Thinking Exercise for Finance Students. American Journal of Business Education, 9(2), 83-86.
Easton, M., & Sommers, Z. (2018). Financial Statement Analysis & Valuation. Seattle: amazon.com.
Gotze, U., Northcott, D., & Schuster, P. (2016). Investment Appraisal. Berlin: Springer.
Greco, S., Figueira, J., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis. New York: Springer.
Hawkins, D. (1997). Corporate financial reporting and analysis: Text and cases. Homewood, IL:
Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Hribar, P., Melessa, S., Mergenthaler, R., & Small, R. C. (2018). An Examination of the Relative
Abilities of Earnings and Cash Flows to Explain Returns and Market Values. Rotman School of
Management Working Paper, 10-15.
Kaszas, M., & Janda, K. (2018). The Impact of Globalization on International Finance and Accounting.
In Indirect Valuation and Earnings Stability: Within-Company Use of the Earnings Multiple (pp. 161-
172). Berlin, Germany: Springer, Cham.
King, R., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The quarterly journal
of economics, 108(3), 717-737.
Kraus, S., Kallmuenzer, A., Stieger, D., Peters, M., & Calabrò, A. (2018). Entrepreneurial paths to
family firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 88, 382-387.
Laaksonen, O., & Peltoniemi, M. (2018). The essence of dynamic capabilities and their measurement.
International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 184-205.
Lamberton, D. (2011). Introduction to stochastic calculus applied to finance. UK: Chapman and Hall.
Landier, A. (2015). The WACC fallacy: The real effects of using a unique discount rate. The Journal
of Finance, 70(3), 1253-1285.
Lee, L., Kerler, W., & Ivancevich, D. (2018). Beyond Excel: Software Tools and the Accounting
Curriculum. AIS Educator Journal, 13(1), 44-61.
Li, W. S. (2018). Strategic Value Analysis: Business Valuation. In Strategic Management Accounting.
Singapore: Springer.
Magni, C. (2015). Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation. European
Journal of Operational Research, 244(3), 855-866.
Marchioni, A., & Magni, C. A. (2018). Sensitivity Analysis and Investment Decisions: NPV-
Consistency of Straight-Line Rate of Return. Department of Economics.
Metcalfe, J., & Miles, I. (2012). Innovation systems in the service economy: measurement and case
study analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
Oliveira, F. B., & Zotes, L. P. (2018). Valuation methodologies for business startups: a bibliographical
study and survey. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(1), 96-111.
Pellegrino, R., Costantino, N., & Tauro, D. (2018). Supply Chain Finance: A supply chain-oriented
perspective to mitigate commodity risk and pricing volatility. Journal of Purchasing and Supply
Management, 1-10.
Pham, T. N., & Alenikov, T. (2018). The importance of Weighted Average Cost of Capital in
investment decision-making for investors of corporations in the healthcare industry.
Smith, K. T., Betts, T. K., & Smith, L. M. (2018). Financial analysis of companies concerned about
human rights. International Journal of Business Excellence, 14(3), 360-379.
Teresa, M. G. (2018). How the Equity Terminal Value Influences the Value of the Firm. Journal of
Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis, 13(1).
Yang, Y., Pankow, J., Swan, H., Willett, J., Mitchell, S. G., Rudes, D. S., & Knight, K. (2018).
Preparing for analysis: a practical guide for a critical step for procedural rigour in large-scale multisite
qualitative research studies. Quality and Quantity, 52(2), 815-828.