Alex Becker

Submission Status | Total Scores | Questions |Statistics

Peer Review #1

Comments for Student:

Table of Contents

Part 1 - Group composition - 2/2 Answered Questions, 0.0/ 30.0 Points

Part 2 - Contribution - 2/2 Answered Questions, 0.0/ 0.0 Points

Part 3 - Performing critical functions - 2/2 Answered Questions, 0.0/ 0.0 Points

Part 4 - Enhancing the work of fellow team members - 3/3 Answered Questions, 0.0/ 0.0 Points

Part 5 - Cooperation and communication - 2/2 Answered Questions, 0.0/ 0.0 Points

Part 6 - Work delivery - 2/2 Answered Questions, 0.0/ 0.0 Points

Part 1 of 6
Group composition

Question 1 of 2: 0.0 / 30.0 Points

Member 1 student number WYRROY001 and name Royden Weyer

Member 2 student number CHCPED001 and name Pedro Chicuba
Member 3 student number FNBMAX001 and name Max Finbow
Member 4 student number GHRISM001 and name Ismail Ghoor
Member 5 student number MNYEDW001 and name Edwin Mooney
Member 6 student number VGLRUE002 and name Ruedi Vogeli

Answer Key: x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x

Comments for Student:

Question 2 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Indicate which role did each member assume for this specific acivity being reviewed.

Coordinator Analyst Spec Compiler General

Yourself
Member 1

Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Part 2 of 6
Contribution

Question 1 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Rate each member's Effort in the team according to :

(4) Distinguished (3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Did a full share of the work
Did an equal share of the
—or more; knows what Did almost as much Did the minimum required Did very little work; doesn’t
work; does work when
needs to be done and does work as others; seldom work; does not ask for catch up after absence;
asked; works hard most
it; volunteers to help asks for help. help. doesn’t ask for help.
of the time.
others.
 of the time.
others.

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Question 2 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Rate each member's Body of Knowledge contribution to the team according to :

(4) Distinguished
Consistently and actively
contributes knowledge,
opinions, and skills without
prompting or reminding
(3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Contributes knowledge, No contribution of
Contributes information to Contributes information to
opinions, and skills knowledge or information,
the group with occasional the group only when
without prompting or even when prompted or
prompting or reminding prompted
reminding reminded

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Part 3 of 6
Performing critical functions
Question 1 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

How did each member accept his/her role in the team ?

(4) Distinguished
Eagerly accepts and fulfills
individual role within group
(3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Accepts and fulfills
Willingly accepts and Reluctantly accepts and
individual role within Negative or even obstructive
fulfills individual role fulfills individual role within
group, perhaps with some in the role within the group
within group group
reservation

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Question 2 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Knowing that each member had a specific role to perform, how did they do in the role?

(4) Distinguished (3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Actively and Limited coordinating
enthusiastically Sufficient coordination as done; did not achieve
coordinated the group required with reasonable good group interaction. Failed to organize the
Good coordination and
activities; Managed any group interaction. No real facilitation - team group; other members had
group dynamics. Proper
differences and work Facilitates only a few members leads to take action. No
Coordinator management of work
sharing while maintaining discussions when it's discussion as they feel facilitation. Discussions
share Usually facilitates
good group interaction. specifically required, like they can contribute, but are disorganized and often
the discussions.
Leads discussions and during brainstorming the coordinator manages runs off track.
facilitates good sessions. to keep everybody on
participation from all. track.
Did an excellent job of
Performed the bare
assimilating and modeling Failed to produce
Good and proper models Basic models with mostly minimum modeling and
the data provided in the analytical models or useful
and useful results. useful results, but often produced little useful
Analyst group; Produces useful results. Other team
Sufficiently described to hard to understand results. Relied to some
results and managed to members had to take
enable understanding exactly what was done. extent on the
describe the work to the contribution of others action.
team members
Produced untidy,
Produced well structured Produced moderate The work was often not
Good documents; incomplete or unreadable
and neat work; Good documents of a typical adequate and some
Adequate readability and documents. Work were
language and use of student level input/editing from team
Spec Compiler representation of the not accepted by team
diagrams, equations and assignment. Basic use members were required
group's work using members for submission
figures. Professional of images and other to achieve submission
diagrams etc. and had to be re-done by
looking documents cosmetic tools readiness
others.

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
 Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Part 4 of 6
Enhancing the work of fellow team members

Question 1 of 3: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Rate each member's Commitment to the team according to :

(4) Distinguished (3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable

Consistently and Consistently works toward Works toward group Works toward group
Negative and not committed
proactively works toward group goals with minimal goals with occasional goals only when
towards group goals
group goals; prompting; prompting prompted

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Question 2 of 3: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Rate each member's Reliability to the team according to :

(4) Distinguished
Completed assigned work
ahead of time. Kept to
commitments, and often
produces more that what
was promised
(3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Needed much reminding;
Completed assigned work Needed some reminding; Needed some reminding;
work was late and it did
on time and within work was late but it didn’t work was late and often
impact quality of work or
commitments impact grade. not as committed.
grade.
 4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Question 3 of 3: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Rate each member's Participation in the team according to :

(4) Distinguished
Helps the group identify
necessary changes and
fully participate in
implemeting changes
(3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Participates in needed Participates in needed Often objects to changes
Willingly participates in
changes with occasional changes when prompted and requires regular
needed changes
prompting and encouraged prompting

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Part 5 of 6
Cooperation and communication

Question 1 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Rate each member's Cooperation in the team according to :

(4) Distinguished (3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Listened to but did not
 Listened to but did not
Actively listened to and Actively listened to, but
Listened to and valued the value the opinions of
valued the opinions of was not evident that he Did not listen to and did not
opinions of others. others, OR Valued the
others. Eager to assist or she valued the value the option of others
Willing to assist if asked opinions of others, but
without being forceful opinions of others
did not listen to them

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Question 2 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Rate each member's Communication skills and ability to handle Critique to the team according to :

(4) Distinguished
Provided many good
ideas; inspired others;
clearly communicated
desires, ideas, personal
needs, and feelings.
Graciously accepted
feedback.
(3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Seemed bored with
Participated in Listened mainly; on some Listened mainly; made
conversations; rarely spoke
discussions; shared occasions, made minimal suggestions.
up, and ideas were off the
feelings and thoughts. suggestions. Reluctantly Seemed not to take
mark. Refused to listen to
Accepted feedback. accepted feedback. feedback seriously.
feedback.

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

 Comments for Student:

Part 6 of 6
Work delivery

Question 1 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Rate each member's Punctuality according to :

(4) Distinguished (3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable

Showed up for meetings Showed up for meetings Occasionally showed up Sometimes showed up Regularly no show or
punctually, sometimes on time. late, but it did not affect late to the extent that it extremely late; feeble or no
ahead of time. the team's progress. hindered the team's excuse offered.
progress

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key:

Comments for Student:

Question 2 of 2: 0.0 / 0.0 Points

Considering each team member's role, rate his/her Quality of work:

(4) Distinguished (3) Proficient (2) Basic (1) Minimal (0) Unacceptable
Ensures that each
Publishes all necessary Members are usually
member is fully informed Publishes the basic
arrangements, but does aware of the Members are often
about all arrangements; arrangements without
not always follow up on arrangements, but the uncertain of the actual
Coordinator Distributes minutes or follow up. Task
individual's progress and task distribution is arrangements and task
task summaries and distribution moderately
understanding of the mostly left to individuals distribution
actively engage in the defined
tasks to keep track of
progress of each member
Thorough and rigorous
Models simply produces
models with very little
the minimal answers, and
fixed assumptions or Models are good and Models are satisfactory to Models are incomplete and
team members
uncertainties. Sometimes calculates the necessary produce most of the inadequate to produce the
sometimes have to do
even derives specific results. Limited results needed. Changes result required by the
Analyst post-processing to get
equations for better expansion of equations. are sometimes difficult team. Very difficult to
results in the desired
implementation. Models Mostly adaptable and and not all inputs can change something or add
format. Changes to the
are adaptable and one can easy to change inputs easily be changed new information.
model is often
easily change input
cumbersome.
parameters.
Satisfactory document,
Professional looking Well written document
but quality of Poor document. Low
Spec Compiler document using quality with fair use of diagrams diagrams/tables could be Minimal document with quality or even absent
diagrams, tables and and tables. Sometimes improved. Structure of only essential diagrams diagrams/tables. Hard to
layout. Easy to read and hard to find info needed information could be & tables with low quality. read.
find information needed. because of structure better.

4 3 2 1 0
Yourself
Member 1
Member 2
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Member 6

Comment

Answer Key: