5.

Effects of surrounding material on the formation of phononic band gaps

 Nous utilisons de LiNbo3 comme Couverture

A LiNbo3
A A
B Sio2

Onde incidente A B

a b

Plot of Reflectance vs frequence

0.9 X: 3.805e+004
Y: 0.8154

0.8
Transmittance Coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
f(Hz) 4
x 10

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

X: 3.8e+004
0.2
Y: 0.1279

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4
x 10
  Nous utilisons de l'époxy comme Couverture

Matériau/constante LiNbO3 SiO2 epoxy

Masse volumique (Kg/m3) 4674 2600 1140

Vitesse longitudinale (m/s) 6574 5840 2770

Vitesse transversale (m/s) 4030 3370 1300

A LiNbo3
C C
B Sio2

A B
Onde incidente

C epoxy
Incidence Normale

a b
 Plot of Reflectance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
Transmittance Coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
f(Hz) 4
x 10

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4
x 10
3. Effects of the number of unit cells on the formation of phononic band gaps

Effet de Nombre de couches :

1/ pour a=b=0.5 µm

N=6

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
transmittance coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5
black:Transversale
0.4
Red-- :longitudinale
0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
f(hz) 6
x 10
N=10

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
transmittance coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
f(hz) 6
x 10

N=16

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
transmittance coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
f(hz) 6
x 10
N=22

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
transmittance coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
f(hz) 6
x 10

N=30

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
transmittance coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
f(hz) 6
x 10
2/ pour a=b=0.5 mm et N=30

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
transmittance coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
f(hz)

1. Effects of materials type on the formation of phononic band gaps

N=21
 Plot of transmittance vs frequence
1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4
x 10

Plot of Reflectance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
Transmittance Coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
f(Hz) 4
x 10
Insertion d’un défaut

N=21

a=0.5µm, b=0.50µm , c=1.0µm

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
transmittance coefficient

0.7 Black:Onde transvesale

0.6

0.5
Red:Onde longitudinale
0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
f(hz)
  Nous utilisons epoxy la première couche

N=21

epoxy
C

A LiNbo3
C
B Sio2

Onde incidente A B

a b

Plot of transmittance vs frequence

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4
x 10
 Plot of Reflectance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
Transmittance Coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
f(Hz) 4
x 10

 Nous utilisons epoxy la couche 11

N=21, rho(11)
 Plot of transmittance vs frequence
1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4
x 10

Plot of Reflectance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
Transmittance Coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
f(Hz) 4
x 10
rhoN1

 Nous mettons la couche époxy en dernier

Plot of transmittance vs frequence
0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4
x 10

Plot of Reflectance vs frequence

0.9

0.8
Transmittance Coefficient

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
f(Hz) 4
x 10
4. Propagation of plane waves through defect PnCs structures

 Statut normal
A LiNbo3
B Sio2

Onde incidente B
A

a b

5
x 10
2
Frequency(Hz)

1.5

1
X: -1
0.5 Y: 3.829e+004

0
-1 0 1
 (ka/ )
  Insertion d’un défaut

A LiNbo3
B Sio2

Onde incidente B
A

4
x 10
8
Frequency(Hz)

4
X: -1
Y: 1.915e+004
2

0
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
 (ka/ )