IPCRF 2018.final

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: RIZALITA P.BALUNDO Name of Rater: ALMA A.LUGOD

Position: Teacher III Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/DivDEPED BOHOL Date of Review: May-19
Rating Period: 2018-2019
BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Ave
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No
Education Knowledge knowledge acceptable
Services and of content Showed evidence
Pedagogy within and knowledge of Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge was shown COT1-5=3 COT2-
across content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its 5=3 COT3-5=3
7.5% integration within integration within integration within integration within 3
curriculum COT4-5=3
teaching and across and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas. subject areas as areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
4.000
with a rating of 7 rating of 6 of 5 of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of No
least 4 lessons lessons using MOV using MOV 1 and the given MOV acceptable
using MOV 1 1 and supported by supported by any 1 evidence
and supported any 1 of the other of the other given was shown 4 LESSONS/COT 5
by any 1 of the given MOV MOV
other given MOV
Basic 2. Used a Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No
Education range of different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
Services teaching strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
strategies promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading was shown
that writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
COT1-5=3 COT2-
enhance numeracy skills numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
5=3 COT3-5=3
learner 7.5% as shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 3
COT4-5=3
schievemen MOV 1 with a with a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
t in literacy rating of 7
and
numeracy
skills
4.000
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 learner- Submitted 1 No
least 4 learner- learner-centered centered lessons as learner-centered acceptable
centered lessons lessons as evidently shown in lessons as evidence
as evidently evidently shown in MOV 1 and evidently shown in was shown
shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 and supported by any 1 any of the other
and supported supported by any 1 of the other MOV given MOV 4 LESSONS/COT 5
by any 1 of the of the other MOV given
other MOV given given
Timeliness
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight
Performance Indicators Actual Results Rating Ave
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No
Education Knowledge range of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies acceptable
Services and teaching strategies that that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical evidence
Pedagogy strategies to develop critical and creative and creative thinking and creative was shown
develop and creative thinking skills skills and/or other thinking skills
critical and thinking skills and/or other HOTS HOTS as shown in and/or other HOTS COT1-5=3 COT2-
creative and/or other as shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 with a rating as shown in MOV 1 5=3 COT3-5=3
thinking, as 7.5% HOTS as shown with a rating of 6 of 5 with a rating of 4 3
COT4-5=3
well as in MOV 1 with a
other higher rating of 7
order
thinking 4.000
skills.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No

least 4 lessons lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by acceptable
as evidenced by evidenced by MOV MOV 1 and any of the other evidence
MOV 1 and 1 and supported by supported by any 1 given MOV was shown
supported by any 1 of the other of the other given 4 LESSONS/COT 5
any 1 of the given MOV MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No
Education Environmen classroom acceptable
Services t and structure to evidence
Diversity of engage was shown
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in
meanigful COT1-5=3 COT2-
exploration, 5=3 COT3-6=4
discovery 7.5% 3.5
COT4-6=4
and hands-
on activities
within a Used classroom 4.250
range of management Used classroom
Used classroom Used classroom
physical strategies that management management management
learning engage learners strategies that
strategies that strategies that
environmen in activities/tasks engage learners in
engage learners in engage learners in
ts. as shown in activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1
shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
rating of 7 with a rating of 6
a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No
Submitted at
supported by any of acceptable
least 4 lessons Submitted 3 Submitted 2 lessons
the acceptable evidence
supported by lessons supported supported by MOV 1
MOV was shown 4 LESSONS/COT 5
MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any and any 1 of the
1 of the other 1 of the other other acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
Education learner management management management management acceptable
Services behavior strategies of strategies of strategies of learner strategies of learner evidence
constructive learner behavior learner behavior behavior that behavior that was shown
ly by that promote that promote promote positive promote positive
applying positive and non- positive and non- and non-violent and non-violent
positive and violent discipline violent discipline as discipline as shown discipline as shown COT1-5=3 COT2-
non-violent as shown in shown in MOV in MOV submitted in MOV submitted 5=3 COT3-5=3
3
discipline MOV submitted submitted with a with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 COT4-5=3
to ensure with a rating of 7 rating of 6
learning-
7.5% 4.000
focused
environmen
t
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at least Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No

least 4 of the 4 of the given of the given the given strategies acceptable
given strategies strategies as strategies as as observed in only evidence
as observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson was shown 4 LESSONS/COT 5
least 4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied differentiated Applied No
Education Environmen differentiate differentiated differentiated teaching strategies differentiated acceptable
Services t and d, teaching teaching strategies to address learner teaching strategies evidence
Diversity of developmen strategies to to address learner diversity as shown in to address learner was shown
Learners tally address learner diversity as shown MOV 1 with a rating diversity as shown
appropriate diversity as in MOV 1 with a of 5 in MOV 1 with a
learning shown in MOV 1 rating of 6 rating of 4
experiences with a rating of 7 COT1-5=3 COT2-
to address 5=3 COT3-5=3
learners’ 7.5% 3
COT4-5=3
gender,
needs,
strengths,
interests
and
experiences
4.000
.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No

least 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in evidence
teaching in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as was shown
strategies in at lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 evidently shown in
least 2 lessons evidenced by MOV and supported by any 1 of the
as evidenced by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV 4 LESSONS/COT 5
MOV 1 and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
supported by acceptable MOV
any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
Education Curriculum managed implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
Services and and developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence
Planning implemente sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching sequenced was shown
d teaching and teaching and and learning process teaching and
developmen learning process learning process as as shown in MOV 1 learning process as
tally as shown in shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1
sequenced MOV 1 with a with a rating of 6 with a rating of 4
teaching rating of 7 COT1-6=4 COT2-
and 6=4 COT3-6=4
learning 4
COT4-6=4
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching
contexts. 7.5% 4.500
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

least 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
developmentally sequenced sequenced teaching sequenced evidence
sequenced teaching and and learning process teaching and was shown
teaching and learning process as as evidently shown learning process as
learning process evidently shown in in MOV 1 and evidently shown in
as evidently MOV 1 and supported by any 1 any 1 of the given
shown in MOV 1 supported by any 1 of the other given MOV 4 LESSONS/COT 5
and supported of the other given MOV
by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 3. 8. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No
Education Curriculum Participated participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ acceptable
Services and in collegial LACs/FGDs/mee LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss evidence
Planning discussions tings to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner was shown
that use teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
teacher and feedback to feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
4
learner enrich instruction instruction as instruction as shown shown in the MOV
feedback to as shown in the shown in the MOV in the MOV submitted
enrich MOV submitted submitted submitted
teaching 7.5% 4.000
practice.
Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meeting LAC/FGD/meeting acceptable
LACs/FGDs/mee gs as evidently s as evidently shown as evidently shown evidence
tings as shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the given in any 1 of the was shown 4
evidently shown the given MOV MOV given MOV
in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and used Developed and No
Education developed, used varied used varied varied teaching and used varied acceptable
Services organized teaching and teaching and learning resources, teaching and evidence
and used learning learning resources, including ICT, to learning resources, was shown
appropriate resources, including ICT, to address learning including ICT, to
teaching including ICT, to address learning goals as shown in address learning
and address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating goals as shown in COT1-5=3 COT2-
learning goals as shown MOV 1 with a of 5 MOV 1 with a rating 5=3 COT3-5=3
3
resources, in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 of 4 COT4-5=3
including rating of 7
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 4.000
7.5% 4.000
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No

Submitted at teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable
least 4 varied learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, evidence
teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as was shown
learning evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
resources, MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
4 LESSONS/COT 5
including ICT, as supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
evidently shown of the acceptable of the acceptable
in MOV 1 and MOV MOV
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No
Education Assessment Designed, selected, selected, organized organized and used organized and used acceptable
Services and selected, organized and and used diagnostic, formative diagnostic, evidence
Reporting organized used diagnostic, diagnostic, and summative formative and was shown
and used formative and formative and assessment summative
diagnostic, summative summative strategies consistent assessment
formative assessment assessment with curriculum strategies
and strategies strategies requirements as consistent with COT1-5=3 COT2-
summative consistent with consistent with shown in MOV 1 with curriculum 6=4 COT3-6=4
7.5% 3.75
assessment curriculum curriculum a rating of 5 requirements as COT4-6=4
strategies requirements as requirements as shown in MOV 1
consistent shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4
with with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 4.375
curriculum
requirement
s.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No

least 4 varied assessment tools assessment tools as assessment tool as acceptable
assessment as evidently shown evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence
tools as in any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the was shown 4 LESSONS/COT 5
evidently shown acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No 4
Education Monitored monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated acceptable
Services and evaluated evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress evidence
evaluated learner progress progress and progress and and achievement was shown
learner and achievement achievement using achievement using using learner
progress using learner learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
and attainment data data as shown in data as shown in the shown in the MOV
achievemen as shown in the the MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted
t using MOV submitted
learner
attainment
7.5% 4.000
data.
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No 4

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV acceptable
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable MOV evidence
acceptable MOV MOV was shown
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No 4
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in acceptable
across 4 across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter evidence
quarters was shown
Basic 4. 12.Commun Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed No
Education Assessment ica ted showed prompt prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear acceptable
Services and promptly and clear communication of communication of communication of evidence
Reporting and clearly communication the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, was shown
the learners’ of the learners’ progress and progress and progress and
needs, needs, progress achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
progress and achievement stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
and to key including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
achievemen stakeholders, guardians as guardians as shown guardians as 4
t to key including shown in the MOV in the MOV shown in the MOV
stakeholder parents/ submitted submitted submitted
s, including guardians as
parents/ 7.5% shown in the 4
guardians. MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV acceptable
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable MOV evidence 4
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No
across 4 across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter evidence 4
quarters was shown
Basic 5. Plus 13. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No
Education Factor Performed performed performed various performed various various related acceptable
Services various various related related related work/activities that evidence
related work/activities work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the was shown
works/activit that contribute to contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
ies that 10% the teaching teaching learning teaching learning process as shown 4
contribute learning process process as shown process as shown in in the MOV
to the as shown in the in the MOV the MOV submitted submitted
teaching- MOV submitted submitted 4.000
learning
process.
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of No
least 4 different different kinds of kinds of acceptable the acceptable acceptable
kinds of acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence 4
acceptable MOV was shown
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ACCOMPL Very Satisfactory
ISHMENT
S
DJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory RIZALITA P.BALUNDO ALMA A.LUGOD PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Score
0.300
0.3
Score
0.300
0.318
0.300
Score
0.3
0.337
Score
0.3
0.3
0.3
Score
0.328
0.300
Score
0.3
0.400
4.083
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)
Name of Employee: RIZALITA P.BALUNDO Name of Rater: ALMA A.LUGOD

Position: TEACHER III Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BOHOL Date of Review: 6-May-19
Rating Period: S.Y. 2018-2019
Weight
Weight
per
KRA per Objectives Score
Objecti
KRA
ve Numerical Ratings
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 3 5 4.000 0.300
Objective 2 7.5% 3 5 4.000 0.300
Objective 3 7.5% 3 5 4.000 0.300
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 3.5 5 4.250 0.318
Objective 5 7.5% 3 5 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 3 5 4.000 0.300
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 3 5 4.000 0.300
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 3.75 5 4.375 0.328
Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 4 4 4.000 0.400
Final Rating 4.083
Adjectival Rating Very Satisfactory
RIZALITA P.BALUNDO ALMA A.LUGOD PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
ITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV
Name of Employee: VIRGILIO F. KIM Name of RateJOVENO A. IBARDALOZA

Position: MT II Position: HEAD TEACHER VI
Bureau/Center/Service/DivSchools Division Office, Manila Date of Review:
BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURI

Performance Indicators
QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled Quality
Education Knowledge effective Modeled Modeled Modeled Modeled
Services and applications effective effective effective effective
Pedagogy of content applications applications applications applications
knowledge of content of content of content of content
within and knowledge knowledge knowledge knowledge
across within and within and within and within and
curriculum 7.5%
across across across across
teaching curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
areas. teaching teaching teaching teaching
areas as areas as areas as areas as
shown in shown in shown in shown in
MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
a rating of 8 a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
Efficiency Submitted Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

at least 4 lessons as lessons as lesson as
lessons as evidenced evidenced evidenced
evidenced by MOV 1 by MOV 1 by MOV 1
by MOV 1 from from from
and colleagues colleagues colleagues
supported and and and
by any 1 of supported supported supported
the other by any 1 of by any 1 of by any 1 of
MOV given the other the other the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given
Timeliness
Basic 2. Quality Conducted, Conducted Conducted Proposedac
Education Collaborate completed and action tion
Services d with and completed research research
colleagues disseminate action with with
in the d action research colleagues colleagues
conduct and research with
application with colleagues
of research 7.5% colleagues
to enrich
knowledge
of content
and
pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted

at least 4 of any 3 of the any 2 MOV any 1 MOV
the given acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness Presented Completed Conducted Proposed

the the the the
research research research research
report within report within report within report within
the rating the rating the rating the rating
period period period period

Basic 1. Content 3. Quality Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat Demonstrat
Education Knowledge Developed ed effective ed effective ed effective ed effective
Services and and applied teaching teaching teaching teaching
Pedagogy effective strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
teaching promote promote promote promote
strategies to critical and critical and critical and critical and
promote creative creative creative creative
critical and thinking, as thinking, as thinking, as thinking, as
creative 7.5% well as well as well as well as
thinking, as other other other other
well as higher-order higher-order higher-order higher-order
other thinking thinking thinking thinking
higher-order skills as skills as skills as skills as
thinking shown in shown in shown in shown in
skills. MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

or more lessons as lessons as lesson as
lessons as evidently evidently evidently
evidently shown in shown in shown in
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and supported supported supported
supported by any 1 of by any 1 of by any of
by any 1 of the other the other the other
the other MOV given MOV given MOV given
MOV given
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked Quality
Education Environmen with
Services t and colleagues
Diversity of to model
Learners and share
effective
techniques
in the
manageme
nt of
classroom
structure to
engage
learners,
individually Modeled Modeled Modeled Modeled
or in and shared and shared and shared and shared
7.5%
groups, in effective effective effective effective
meaningful classroom classroom classroom classroom
exploration, manageme manageme manageme manageme
discovery nt strategies nt strategies nt strategies nt strategies
and hands- that engage that engage that engage that engage
on activities learners in learners in learners in learners in
within a activities/ activities/ activities/ activities/
range of tasks done tasks done tasks done tasks done
physical in different in different in different in different
learning physical physical physical physical
environmen learning learning learning learning
ts.environm environmen environmen environmen environmen
ents. ts as shown ts as shown ts as shown ts as shown
in MOV 1 in MOV 1 in MOV 1 in MOV 1
with a rating with a rating with a rating with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted 1
Submitted lesson
at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 supported
lessons lessons lessons by any of
supported supported supported the
by MOV 1 by MOV 1 by MOV 1 acceptable
and any 1 and any 1 and any 1 MOV
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness

Basic 2. Learning 5. Exhibited Quality Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited
Education Environmen effective effective effective effective effective
Services t and and and and and and
Diversity of constructive constructive constructive constructive constructive
Learners behavior behavior behavior behavior behavior
manageme manageme manageme manageme manageme
nt skills by nt skills by nt skills by nt skills by nt skills by
applying applying applying applying applying
positive and positive and positive and positive and positive and
non-violent 7.5% non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
ensure ensure ensure ensure ensure
learning- learning- learning- learning- learning-
focused focused focused focused focused
environmen environmen environmen environmen environmen
ts. ts shown in ts shown in ts shown in ts shown in
MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
Efficiency Applied at Applied at Applied at Applied any
least 7 of least 7 of least 7 of of the given
the given the given the given strategies
strategies strategies strategies as observed
as observed as observed as observed in only 1
in at least 4 in 3 lessons in 2 lessons lesson
lessons
Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with
Education with colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues
Services colleagues at least in in the but no but no
to share the department evidence of evidence of
differentiate district/clust or grade sharing with sharing with
d, er level to level to others others
developmen share share
tally lesson lesson
appropriate
opportunitie
s to address
7.5%
learners’
differences
in gender,
needs,
strengths,
interests
and
experiences
.

at least 1 at least 1 at least 1 at least 1
lesson as lesson as lesson as lesson, as
evidently evidently evidently evidenced
shown in shown in shown in by either
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 2 or 3
supported supported supported but no
by any by any by any evidence of
acceptable acceptable acceptable sharing with
MOV MOV MOV others
Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Quality Developed Developed Developed Developed
Education Curriculum Developed and applied and applied and applied and applied
Services and and applied effective effective effective effective
Planning effective strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies in showing showing showing showing
the planning developmen developmen developmen developmen
and tally- tally- tally- tally-
manageme sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
nt of teaching teaching teaching teaching
developmen and and and and
tally learning learning learning learning
sequenced process as process as process as process as
teaching 7.5% shown in shown in shown in shown in
and MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
learning a rating of 8 a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching
contexts.
Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 Submitted 1

at least 4 2-3 lessons lesson as lesson as
lessons as as evidenced evidenced
evidenced evidenced by shown in by any 1 of
by MOV 1 by MOV 1 MOV 1 the
and 2 and and 2 and and/or 2 acceptable
supported supported and MOV
by any 1 of by any 1 of supported
the other the other by any 1 of
acceptable acceptable the other
MOV MOV acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

Basic 3. 8. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionall Rarely led
Education Curriculum Reviewed participated led y led collaborativ
Services and with in collaborativ collaborativ e reviews of
Planning colleagues, LACs/FGDs e reviews of e reviews of teacher and
teacher and /meetings to teacher and teacher and learner
learner discuss learner learner feedback as
feedback to teacher/lear feedback as feedback as evidenced
plan, 7.5% ner evidenced evidenced by the MOV
facilitate feedback to by the MOV by the MOV submitted
and enrich enrich submitted submitted
teaching instruction
practice. as shown in
the MOV
submitted
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

collaborativ collaborativ collaborativ collaborativ
e reviews of e reviews of e reviews of e review of
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and
learner learner learner learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in shown in shown in shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
supported supported supported acceptable
by any 1 of by any 1 of by any 1 of MOV
the the the
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Advised Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionall Rarely
Education and guided advised advised y advised advised
Services colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues
in the in the in the in the in the
selection, selection, selection, selection, selection,
organization organization organization organization organization
, , , , ,
developmen developmen developmen developmen developmen
t and use of t and t and t and t and
appropriate appropriate appropriate appropriate appropriate
teaching use of use of use of use of
and 7.5% teaching teaching teaching teaching
learning and and and and
resources, learning learning learning learning
including resources resources resources resources
ICT, to as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
address the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
specific submitted submitted submitted submitted
learning
goals.

at least 4 teaching teaching teaching
teaching and and and
and learning learning learning
learning resources resources resource as
resources as as evidenced
as evidenced evidenced by any of
evidenced by at least 1 by at least 1 the
by at least 1 of the of the acceptable
of the acceptable acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionall Rarely
Education Assessment collaborativ reviewed reviewed y reviewed reviewed
Services and ely with collaborativ collaborativ collaborativ collaborativ
Reporting colleagues ely ely ely ely
to review assessment assessment assessment assessment
the design, tools with tools with tools with tools with
selection, colleagues colleagues colleagues colleagues
organization as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
and use of the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
a range of submitted submitted submitted submitted
effective
diagnostic,
formative 7.5%
and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent
with
curriculum
requirement
s.

at least 4 assessment assessment assessment
assessment tools as tools as tool as
tools as evidently evidently evidently
evidently shown in shown in shown in
shown in any of the any of the any of the
any of the acceptable acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 4. 11. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionall Rarely
Education Assessment Interpreted collaborated collaborated y collaborated
Services and collaborativ with with collaborated with
Reporting ely colleagues colleagues with colleagues
monitoring in the in the colleagues in the
and interpretatio interpretatio in the interpretatio
evaluation n of n of interpretatio n of
strategies of assessment assessment n of assessment
attainment 7.5% data as data as assessment data as
data to shown in shown in data as shown in
support the MOV the MOV shown in the MOV
learner submitted submitted the MOV submitted
progress submitted
and
achievemen
t.

at least 2 at least 3 of at least 2 of any 1 of the
different the same the same MOV
types of kind of kind of
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionall Rarely
Education skills in the applied applied y applied applied
Services effective skills in the skills in the skills in the skills in the
communicat effective effective effective effective
ion of communicat communicat communicat communicat
learner ion of ion of ion of ion of
needs, learner learner learner learner
progress needs and needs and needs and needs and
and 7.5% progress to progress to progress to progress to
achievemen parents/ parents/ parents/ parents/
t to key guardians guardians guardians guardians
stakeholder as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
s, including the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
parents/gua submitted submitted submitted submitted
rdians.
at least 4 of any 3 MOV any 2 MOV any 1 MOV
the
acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus 13. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionall Rarely
Education Factor Performed performed performed y performed performed
Services various special special special special
related tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or
works/activit assignment assignment assignment assignment
ies that 10% s as shown s as shown s as shown s as shown
contribute in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
to the submitted submitted submitted submitted
teaching-
learning
process.

at least 4 only 3 only 2 any 1 of the
different different different acceptable
kinds of kinds of kinds of MOV
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVIN
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater
. IBARDALOZA
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Actual ResultsRating Ave Score

Poor
(1) Q E T
No 5 5 5 5.000 0.375
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 5
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 3 2 3 2.667 0.200
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No
acceptable
evidence
was shown 4
No
acceptable
evidence
was shown

Poor
(1) Q E T
No 4 4 5 4.500 0.337
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 5
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 5 3 3 3.000 0.225
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 5
acceptable
evidence
was shown
Poor
(1) Q E T
No 5 5 4 4.500 0.337
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 4
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 4 4 4 4.000 0.3
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 5
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 5 5 5 5.000 0.375
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 5
acceptable
evidence
was shown
Poor
(1) Q E T
No 3 4 3 3.500 0.262
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 3
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 4 4 4 4.000 0.3
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 4
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 4 4 4.000 0.300
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No
acceptable
evidence
was shown

Poor
(1) Q E T
No 4 4 4 0.3
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 4 4 4.000 0.300
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No 5 5 5.000 0.500
acceptable
evidence
was shown
No
acceptable
evidence
was shown
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ACCOMPL Very Satisfactory 4.111
ISHMENT
S
NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

Approving Authority
MMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
cher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)
Name of Employe
JOCELYN A. BARATAS Name of NEMIA
Rater: A. CRESCENCIO
Position: Teacher I Position: Principal I
Bureau/Center/SerBOHOL Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018-2019
Weight
Weight
Objecti per
KRA per Score
ves Objecti
KRA
ve
Numerical Ratings
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objectiv 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objectiv 7.5% 3 2 3 2.667 0.200
Objectiv 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 2 22.5% Objectiv 7.5% 3 3 3.000 0.225
Objectiv 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objectiv 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 3 22.5% Objectiv 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objectiv 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
Objectiv 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 4 22.5% Objectiv 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objectiv 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objectiv 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Fac 10% Objectiv 10% 5 5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating 4.111
jectival Rating Very Satisfactory
NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

SCENCIO
y Satisfactory
G AUTHORITY
Name of Employee: WARREN M. AUXTERO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Position: Teacher III Position: PRINCIPAL 1
Bureau/Center/Service/DivDEPED BOHOL Date of Review: Apr-19

7.5% integration within integration within integration within integration within 4.25
curriculum COT4-6=4
4.625
other given MOV
COT1-6=4 COT2-
7=5 COT3-6=4
learner 7.5% as shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 4.5
COT4-7=5
and
numeracy
skills
4.750
Timeliness
thinking, as 7.5% HOTS as shown with a rating of 6 of 5 with a rating of 4 4.5
COT4-7=5
order
thinking 4.750
skills.

other given MOV
Timeliness
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in
discovery 7.5% 4.5
COT4-7=5
and hands-
on activities
Submitted at
Timeliness
4.5
learning-
7.5% 4.750
focused
environmen
t

Timeliness
learners’ 7.5% 4.5
COT4-7=5
gender,
needs,
strengths,
interests
and
experiences
4.250
.

any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
and 7=5 COT3-6=4
learning 4.75
COT4-7=5
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching

by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness
4
teaching 7.5% 4.000
practice.

in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
5
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 4.500
7.5% 4.500

4 LESSONS/COT 4
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
7.5% 5
curriculum
requirement
s.

in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No
and attainment data data as shown in data as shown in the shown in the MOV 4
learner
attainment
7.5% 4.000
data.
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No

least 4 of the the acceptable MOV evidence 4
the acceptable
quarters was shown

quarters was shown
learning
process.
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ISHMENT
S

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory WARREN M. AUXTERO NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
Score
0.346
0.356
Score
0.356
0.356
0.356
Score
0.318
0.365
Score
0.3
0.337
0.337
Score
0.337
0.300
Score
0.3
0.400
4.427
Name of Employee: WARREN M. AUXTERO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: BOHOL Date of Review: 5-Apr-19
Weight Weight
per
KRA per Objectives Objectiv Numerical Ratings Score
KRA e
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 4.25 5 4.625 0.346
Objective 2 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
Objective 3 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
Objective 5 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
Objective 6 7.5% 4.5 4 4.250 0.318
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 4.75 5 4.875 0.365
Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.427
WARREN M. AUXTERO NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.
Name of Employee: JULIETA R. AUXTERO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO


curriculum COT4-7=5
5.000
other given MOV
COT1-7=5 COT2-
7=5 COT3-7=5
COT4-7=5
and
numeracy
skills
5.000
Timeliness
thinking, as 7.5% HOTS as shown with a rating of 6 of 5 with a rating of 4 5
COT4-7=5
order
thinking 5.000
skills.

other given MOV
Timeliness
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in
discovery 7.5% 5
COT4-7=5
and hands-
on activities
Submitted at
Timeliness
5
learning-
7.5% 5.000
focused
environmen
t

Timeliness
learners’ 7.5% 5
COT4-7=5
gender,
needs,
strengths,
interests
and
experiences
5.000
.

any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
and 7=5 COT3-7=5
learning 5
COT4-7=5
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching

by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness
4
teaching 7.5% 4.000
practice.

in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
4.75
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 4.375
7.5% 4.375

4 LESSONS/COT 4
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
7.5% 5
curriculum
requirement
s.

in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
learner
attainment
7.5% 4.000
data.

quarters was shown

quarters was shown
learning
process.
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ACCOMPL OUTSTANDING
ISHMENT
S

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory JULIETA R. AUXTERO NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
Score
0.375
0.375
Score
0.375
0.375
0.375
Score
0.375
0.375
Score
0.3
0.328
0.328
Score
0.337
0.300
Score
0.3
0.400
4.590
Name of Employee: JULIETA R. AUXTERO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Weight
Weight
per
Objecti
KRA
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 2 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 3 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 5 7.5% 5 5 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 4.75 4 4.375 0.328
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Final Rating 4.590
Adjectival Rating Outstanding
JULIETA R. AUXTERO NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.
Name of Employee: ROSEMARIE P. JANDAYAN Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO


curriculum COT4-7=5
5.000
other given MOV
COT1-7=5 COT2-
6=4 COT3-6=4
COT4-7=5
and
numeracy
skills
4.750
Timeliness
COT4-7=5
order
thinking 4.750
skills.

other given MOV
Timeliness
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in
discovery 7.5% 5
COT4-7=5
and hands-
on activities
Submitted at
Timeliness
5
learning-
7.5% 4.500
focused
environmen
t

Timeliness
COT4-7=5
gender,
needs,
strengths,
interests
and
experiences
4.375
.

any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
and 7=5 COT3-7=5
learning 5
COT4-7=5
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching

by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness
4
teaching 7.5% 4.000
practice.

in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
4.75
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 4.375
7.5% 4.375

4 LESSONS/COT 4
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
7.5% 5
curriculum
requirement
s.

in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
learner
attainment
7.5% 4.000
data.

quarters was shown

quarters was shown
learning
process.
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ISHMENT
S

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory ROSEMARIE P. JANDAYAN NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
Score
0.375
0.356
Score
0.356
0.337
0.3375
Score
0.328
0.337
Score
0.3
0.328
0.328
Score
0.337
0.300
Score
0.3
0.400
4.391
Name of Employee: ROSEMARIE P. JANDAYAN Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Weight
Weight
per
Objecti
KRA
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 2 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
Objective 3 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 5 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 6 7.5% 4.75 4 4.375 0.328
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 4.75 4 4.375 0.328
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Final Rating 4.391
ROSEMARIE P. JANDAYAN NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.
Name of Employee: DELIA C. ANESLAGON Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO


7.5% integration within integration within integration within integration within 4.75
curriculum COT4-7=5
4.875
other given MOV
COT1-6=4 COT2-
7=5 COT3-6=4
COT4-6=4
and
numeracy
skills
4.625
Timeliness
COT4-7=5
order
thinking 4.750
skills.

other given MOV
Timeliness
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in
discovery 7.5% 4.5
COT4-7=5
and hands-
on activities
Submitted at
Timeliness
4.75
learning-
7.5% 4.375
focused
environmen
t

Timeliness
COT4-7=5
gender,
needs,
strengths,
interests
and
experiences
4.375
.

any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
and 7=5 COT3-6=4
learning 4.75
COT4-7=5
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching

by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness
4
teaching 7.5% 4.000
practice.

in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
5
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 5.000
7.5% 5.000

4 LESSONS/COT 5
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
7.5% 4.75
curriculum
requirement
s.

in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
learner
attainment
7.5% 4.000
data.

quarters was shown

quarters was shown
learning
process.
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ISHMENT
S

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory DELIA C. ANESLAGON NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
Score
0.365
0.346
Score
0.356
0.318
0.328125
Score
0.328
0.328
Score
0.3
0.375
0.375
Score
0.328
0.300
Score
0.3
0.400
4.372
Name of Employee: DELIA C. ANESLAGON Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Weight
Weight
per
Objecti
KRA
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 4.75 5 4.875 0.365
Objective 2 7.5% 4.25 5 4.625 0.346
Objective 3 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 4.5 4 4.250 0.318
Objective 5 7.5% 4.75 4 4.375 0.328
Objective 6 7.5% 4.75 4 4.375 0.328
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 4.75 4 4.375 0.328
Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 4.75 4 4.375 0.328
Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Final Rating 4.372
DELIA C. ANESLAGON NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.
Name of Employee: MILDRED G. ERONICO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Position: Teacher I Position: PRINCIPAL 1

content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its 6=4 COT3-6=4
JUNE 2018 TO MARCH, 2019
across 7.5% 4
curriculum integration within integration within integration within integration within COT4-6=4
4.000
other given MOV
COT1-7=5 COT2-
7=5 COT3-6=4
COT4-7=5

and
numeracy
skills
4.875
Timeliness
7.5% 4

thinking, as HOTS as shown with a rating of 6 of 5 with a rating of 4 COT4-6=4
order
thinking 4.500
skills.

other given MOV
Timeliness
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in

discovery 7.5% 4.5
COT4-7=5
and hands-
on activities
Submitted at
Timeliness

5
learning-
7.5% 5.000
focused
environmen
t

Timeliness
COT4-7=5
gender,
needs,

strengths,
interests
and
experiences
4.875
.

any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
and 7=5 COT3-7=5
learning 5
COT4-7=5
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching

by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness

4
teaching 7.5% 4.000
practice.

in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
3.5
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 3.750
JUNE 2018 TO MARCH,
7.5% 3.750

4 LESSONS/COT 4
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
7=5 COT3-7=5
summative 7.5% consistent with consistent with shown in MOV 1 with curriculum 5
curriculum
requirement
s.

in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness

learner
attainment
7.5% 4.333
data.

quarters was shown
4

achievemen stakeholders, guardians as guardians as shown guardians as

quarters was shown

learning
process.
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ISHMENT
S

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MILDRED G. ERONICO NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
Score
0.300
0.365
Score
0.337
0.356
0.375
Score
0.365
0.375
Score
0.3
0.281
0.281
Score
0.337
0.324
Score
0.3
0.400
4.415
Name of Employee: MILDRED G. ERONICO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Position: TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Weight
Weight
per
Objecti
KRA
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 2 7.5% 4.75 5 4.875 0.365
Objective 3 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
Objective 5 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 6 7.5% 4.75 5 4.875 0.365
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 3.5 4 3.750 0.281
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 11 7.5% 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Final Rating 4.415
MILDRED G. ERONICO NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.
Name of Employee: BERLITA A. POLESTICO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO


across 7.5% 4.25

4.625
other given MOV
COT1-5=3 COT2-
7=5 COT3-6=4
COT4-6=4

and
numeracy
skills
4.125
Timeliness
7.5% 4.75

order
thinking 4.875
skills.

other given MOV
Timeliness
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in

discovery 7.5% 5
COT4-7=5
and hands-
on activities
Submitted at
Timeliness

4.5
learning-
7.5% 4.250
focused
environmen
t

Timeliness
COT4-7=5
gender,
needs,

strengths,
interests
and
experiences
4.250
.

any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
and 6=4 COT3-7=5
learning 4.5
COT4-7=5
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching

by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness

4
teaching 7.5% 4.000
practice.

in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
4.75
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 4.875
JUNE 2018 TO MARCH,
7.5% 4.875

4 LESSONS/COT 5
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
6=4 COT3-7=5
summative 7.5% consistent with consistent with shown in MOV 1 with curriculum 4.5
curriculum
requirement
s.

in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness

learner
attainment
7.5% 4.000
data.

quarters was shown
4


quarters was shown

learning
process.
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ISHMENT
S

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory BERLITA A. POLESTICO NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
Score
0.346
0.309
Score
0.365
0.337
0.31875
Score
0.318
0.356
Score
0.3
0.365
0.365
Score
0.318
0.300
Score
0.3
0.450
4.382
Name of Employee: BERLITA A. POLESTICO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Weight
Weight
per
Objecti
KRA
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 4.25 5 4.625 0.346
Objective 2 7.5% 4.25 4 4.125 0.309
Objective 3 7.5% 4.75 5 4.875 0.365
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 5 7.5% 4.5 4 4.250 0.318
Objective 6 7.5% 4.5 4 4.250 0.318
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 4.75 5 4.875 0.365
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 4.5 4 4.250 0.318
Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Final Rating 4.382
BERLITA A. POLESTICO NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.
Name of Employee: ARLENE A. ROSALES Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO


across 7.5% 3.75

3.875
other given MOV
COT1-5=3 COT2-
6=4 COT3-6=4
COT4-6=4

and
numeracy
skills
3.875
Timeliness
7.5% 4

order
thinking 4.000
skills.

other given MOV
Timeliness
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in

discovery 7.5% 4.25
COT4-6=4
and hands-
on activities
Submitted at
Timeliness

5
learning-
7.5% 5.000
focused
environmen
t

Timeliness
learners’ 7.5% 4
COT4-5=3
gender,
needs,

strengths,
interests
and
experiences
4.000
.

any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
and 5=3 COT3-6=4
learning 3.25
COT4-5=3
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching

by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness

3
teaching 7.5% 3.000
practice.

in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
3.75
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 4.375
JUNE 2018 TO MARCH,
7.5% 4.375

4 LESSONS/COT 5
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
6=4 COT3-6=4
summative 7.5% consistent with consistent with shown in MOV 1 with curriculum 4
with with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 4
curriculum
requirement
s.

in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness

learner
attainment
7.5% 4.000
data.

quarters was shown
4


quarters was shown

learning
process.
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ISHMENT
S

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory ARLENE A. ROSALES NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
Score
0.290
0.29
Score
0.300
0.309
0.375
Score
0.3
0.309
Score
0.225
0.328
0.328
Score
0.3
0.300
Score
0.3
0.400
4.026
Name of Employee: ARLENE A. ROSALES Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Weight
Weight
per
Objecti
KRA
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 3.75 4 3.875 0.290
Objective 2 7.5% 3.75 4 3.875 0.290
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 4.25 4 4.125 0.309
Objective 5 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 3.25 5 4.125 0.309
Objective 8 7.5% 3 3 3.000 0.225
Objective 9 7.5% 3.75 5 4.375 0.328
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Final Rating 4.026
ARLENE A. ROSALES NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.
Name of Employee: DOROTHY B. QUIMSON Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO


across 7.5% 4.5

4.250
other given MOV
COT1-6=4 COT2-
6=4 COT3-6=4
COT4-6=4

and
numeracy
skills
4.000
Timeliness
7.5% 3.5

order
thinking 4.250
skills.

other given MOV
Timeliness
Learners learners,
individually
or in
groups, in

discovery 7.5% 3.75
COT4-6=4
and hands-
on activities
Submitted at
Timeliness

4.25
learning-
7.5% 4.625
focused
environmen
t

Timeliness
learners’ 7.5% 4
COT4-6=4
gender,
needs,

strengths,
interests
and
experiences
4.500
.

any 1 of the
other acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
and 6=4 COT3-7=5
learning 4.5
COT4-7=5
processes
to meet
curriculum
requirement
s and varied
teaching

by any 1 of the MOV
other given MOV
Timeliness

3
teaching 7.5% 3.000
practice.

in any 1 of the
given MOV
Timeliness
4.25
ICT, to
address
learning
goals. 7.5% 4.125
JUNE 2018 TO MARCH,
7.5% 4.125

4 LESSONS/COT 4
supported by
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
7=5 COT3-7=5
summative 7.5% consistent with consistent with shown in MOV 1 with curriculum 4.75
curriculum
requirement
s.

in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness

learner
attainment
7.5% 4.000
data.

quarters was shown
4


quarters was shown

learning
process.
Timeliness
RATING
FOR
OVER-ALL
ISHMENT
S

1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory DOROTHY B. QUIMSON NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph. D.
Score
0.318
0.3
Score
0.318
0.328
0.346875
Score
0.337
0.356
Score
0.225
0.309
0.309
Score
0.365
0.300
Score
0.3
0.400
4.202
Name of Employee: DOROTHY B. QUIMSON Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Weight
Weight
per
Objecti
KRA
Q E T Ave
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 4.5 4 4.250 0.318
Objective 2 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 3 7.5% 3.5 5 4.250 0.318
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 4 7.5% 3.75 5 4.375 0.328
Objective 5 7.5% 4.25 5 4.625 0.346
Objective 6 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 7 7.5% 4.5 5 4.750 0.356
Objective 8 7.5% 3 3 3.000 0.225
Objective 9 7.5% 4.25 4 4.125 0.309
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 10 7.5% 4.75 5 4.875 0.365
Objective 11 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Final Rating 4.202
DOROTHY B. QUIMSON NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO PERCY P. TORRES, Ph.D.

IPCRF 2018.final

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

IPCRF 2018.final

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: RIZALITA P.BALUNDO Name of Rater: ALMA A.LUGOD

BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at least Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No

Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No 4

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No

DJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

Name of Employee: RIZALITA P.BALUNDO Name of Rater: ALMA A.LUGOD

Name of Employee: VIRGILIO F. KIM Name of RateJOVENO A. IBARDALOZA

BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURI

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight

Efficiency Submitted Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted

Timeliness Presented Completed Conducted Proposed

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted 1 Submitted 1

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

Efficiency Submitted Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

Efficiency Submitted Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted

DJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Actual ResultsRating Ave Score

Actual ResultsRating Ave Score

Actual ResultsRating Ave Score

NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Name of Employee: WARREN M. AUXTERO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at least Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No

Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No

DJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

Name of Employee: WARREN M. AUXTERO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

Name of Employee: JULIETA R. AUXTERO Name of Rater: NEMIA A. CRESCENCIO

BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at least Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No

Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No 4

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No

DJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES