Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Contaminated Soil
and Groundwater
Copyright © 1995 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS, Philadelphia, PA. All
rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed,
mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of
the publisher.
Photocopy Rights
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal
use of specific clients, is granted by the AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATE-
RIALS for users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional
Reporting Service, provided that the base fee of $2.50 per copy, plus $0.50 per page is paid
directly to CCC, 27 Congress St., Salem, MA 01970; (508) 744-3350. For those organizations
that have been granted a photocopy license by CCC, a separate system of payment has
been arranged. The fee code for users of the Transactional Reporting Service is
0-8031-1803-1-95 $2.50 + .50.
NOTE: This manual does not purport to address (all of) the safety problems associated with its use. It
is the responsibility of the user of this manual to establish appropriate safety and health practices and
determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Printed in Philadelphia, PA
Jan. 1995
Software Package in Support of ASTM Cleanup Criteria for
Contaminated Soil and Groundwater (Data Series 64)
Software License Agreement
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
•IBM or IBM compatible PC (286 or above)
•A minimum of 640 kbytes RAM
• 530 kbytes available executable memory
•MS-DOS 3.0 or greater
•Monitor (VGA Color) or monochrome monitor
• Printer - any line printer
2. License. You acknowledge that the American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) is the exclusive owners of the enclosed software and documentation. ASTM,
in return for the payment of a one-time license fee, hereby grants you a nonexclusive
and nontransferable license to use the enclosed software and documentation on a
single computer.
3. Copyright: Restrictions On Use and Transfer. The software and the documen-
tation are copyrighted. YOU MAY NOT USE, COPY, MODIFY, MERGE, OR TRANSFER
THE SOFTWARE OR THE DOCUMENTATION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, EXCEPT AS
EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT. You may make no more than one
copy of the software to serve as a back-up copy. The original and any back-up copy of
the software may be used only in connection with a single computer. Simultaneous
use of the software and any back-up copy is strictly prohibited. Without the prior
written consent of ASTM, the software may not be distributed to others or transferred
electronically from one computer to another over a network used on any multi-termi-
nal computer system. IF YOU TRANSFER POSSESSION OF ANY COPY, MODIFICA-
TION, OR MERGED PORTION OF THE SOFTWARE OR DOCUMENTATION TO AN-
OTHER PARTY, YOUR LICENSE IS AUTOMATICALLY TERMINATED.
4. Support. During the first year reasonable technical support will be provided by way
of telephone or telex consultation at the numbers listed in the documentation, pro-
vided you return the enclosed Owner's Registration Card. FAILURE TO RETURN THE
OWNER'S REGISTRATION CARD WILL PRECLUDE YOU FROM RECEIVING ANY
SUPPORT SERVICES. Technical support services will only be provided to the person or
company listed on the Owner's Registration Card.
iii
5. Term. This license commences the day the package is opened and is effective until
terminated. Upon termination, you are obligated to return the software and documen·
tation to the place of purchase together with any and all copies, modifications, and
merged portions. You may terminate the license by returning the software and
documentation together with any and all copies, modifications, and merged portions
to the place of purchase.
6. Limited Warranty. ASTM warrants to you that for a period of ninety (90) days
("Warranty Period") from the date this package is opened that the software, including
the disk, is free from defects and will perform as described in the User Manual when
operated in the manner set forth therein and that the User Manual contains all the
information and instructions necessary to operate the software. In the event a defect is
found to exist in the software during the Warranty Period, ASTM's sole obligation to
you shall be to provide you with a replacement diskette.
8. Disclaimer. Extensive effort has been expended to make the computer program
described in this software and documentation and distributed by ASTM accurate and
reliable. However, neither the ASTM, its officers, directors, or employees, not the
members and officers of Committee E-50, nor the employers of these persons, either
singly or jointly, accept any responsibility for any errors which may exist in the
program, nor for any mishaps that may result from use of the program, even if such
use is in accordance with the instruction supplied with said program. Neither ASTM
nor any other person who has been involved in the creation, production, or delivery
of the software or documentation should be liable for any personal injury or property
damage resulting from the use of the software or documentation. In the event that it
shall be determined that the program furnished by ASTM contains one or more errors,
the liability of ASTM shall be limited to the correction or errors and the replacement of
any erroneous parts. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, OR OF
FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR ANY OTHER WARRANTIES, EX-
PRESS OR IMPLIED, ACCOMPANYING THIS PROGRAM.
iv
Foreword
ASTM Committee E-50 on Environmental Assessment is the sponsor of Data Series
(DS) 64 on Cleanup Criteria for Contaminated Soil and Groundwater. Every attempt
has been made to insure the accuracy and timeliness of the information included in
this book. The general cut-off date for the information collected was 15 Aug., 1993.
Every effort has been made to ensure the data in the publication are accurate.
However, in a book containing so many numbers, there is a possibility some errors
may not have been caught and corrected in the quality control process. As such, if you
find an error, please let ASTM know so that the errors may be corrected in the next
update. Also, if you have any suggestions or comments, I would like to hear from you.
If you have any complaints about the subject matter, I will share the blame with Bill
Gulledge, Chairman of ASTM Subcommittee E50.04, who so freely volunteered me for
this undertaking.
No book of this magnitude can be completed without assistance from many capable
individuals. In particular, I would like to acknowledge Connie Marini of Environ-
mental Data Resources, Inc. who was responsible for collecting state cleanup criteria,
Tom Scelfo of Wehran who assisted me in collection of the cleanup criteria data, Kathy
Dernoga and Sue Gebremedhin of ASTM who were responsible for coordinating my
efforts, Kathleen A. Peters of ASTM who was responsible for the editing of text and
inputting numerical cleanup values into the software, and AGC Sedgwick of Prince-
ton, New Jersey who was responsible for developing the search software.
v
About the Editor
vi
Contents
Chapter 1: Cleanup Criteria for Contaminated Soil and Groundwater 1
Table I: Representative Limits of Detection 5
vii
Illinois 103
Indiana 105
Iowa 106
Kansas 107
Kentucky 117
Louisiana 118
Maine 119
Maryland 120
Massachusetts 121
Michigan 131
Minnesota 140
Mississippi 145
Missouri 146
Montana 147
Nebraska 148
Nevada 150
New Hampshire 151
New Jersey 152
New Mexico 158
New York 159
North Carolina 164
North Dakota 167
Ohio 168
Oklahoma 169
Oregon 171
Pennsylvania 177
Rhode Island 178
South Carolina 180
South Dakota 182
Tennessee 185
Texas 188
Utah 198
Vermont 199
Virginia 202
Washington 203
West Virginia 205
Wisconsin 206
Wyoming 210
viii
Chapter 1: Cleanup Criteria for Contaminated Soil
and Groundwater
DS64-EB/Jan. 1995
3
Copyright © 1995 by ASTM International www.astm.org
4 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Table 1 Cont'd.
Soil Groundwater
Soil Groundwater
Soil Groundwater
Soil Groundwate r
Calculating cleanup levels based on the n:sults a f a site- The pathways listed in Table 2 should be evaluated to iden-
specific risk assessment can be detailed or simple depending ti.fy the contaminated media for which cleanup levels should
on the recp1irements at a partirnlar site. Jn either ca~e, 1heap- he devc loped. At some si 1e~, only a sin a II f ra ctiH n of pot entia 1
pm a ch rn he usc:d should be as simple as possible and familiar cx1H1surc pathways may bc relevant. At other sites, all path-
to the regulatory agencic:s 1hat will be: rc:vic:wing the dorn- ways li~tc:d may be important. Ckanup kvcls should be de1 er-
ment. A simple approach will usually be he: a Ith prntcctive and mined for a sped fie med i nm, such as soil, rather than for each
generally more acceptable to regulators than a mmplicated individual exposure pathway. For soils, it is important to con-
approach, but tnay he overly stringent. A more de1ailcd ap- sider the potential for cu ntaminants in soil to reach ground-
proach can prnduce values th at are somewhat less con~erva wa1er. Some comaminams are relatively immobile, such as
tive but may not he as re a di! y a ccc: 111 a bk. Rc:g11 latnry agencies certain inorganic contaminants (for cxample, !ead and cad-
generally have Jim itcd 1irn c: and resmircc:s and may not be mium) and may not be likely to pose a ~ignificant threat t(]
able to review and accept a complex novel a11prnach. groundwater quality. Other contaminants, such as the or-
The: mmt cri1ical components of a risk assessment arc 1he ganics ben7.ene and trichlurnethylene, are relatively soluble
expu~urc: assc:ssmcm and the toxicity evaluatiou. Critical fac- in water a11 d much more mu bile a11d likely to move from soil
tors influencing expnsure include: exposure pathways, po- to 1hc gmtmdwatcr. The cleanup level calculated for each me-
l entially expctst:d populations, frequency and duration of dium shuuld include considerati<m (]fall ]lathways 1hat con-
potential expos11re, tramport and fa1e of 1he chc:mical in the tribute to exJ1os11rc or risk. For cxampk, the cleanup kvcls
site's enviromnent, and site characteristics, such as paving or for soil should be developed using all possible exposme routes
fences and distance to potential receptor pop11lations. Toxic- fur soil that are appropria1c at a site (for example, ingestion,
ity valuc:s have been developed by regulatory agencies for a de nna ! cnn ta c1, in ha la ti on of su i l a~ dust particles, etc.).
large number of chc:mica ls and should be used if available (re- There arc three primary rolltes by which toxic agents can
fer to Tab le 3 ). If no toxici1 y cri1eria arc available, a value can enter the body:
be derived usiug siandard approaches but the value ~ho11!d be •ingestion of contaminated water and fond (e.g., fruits,
apprnvcd hy 1he appropriate regulatory agency prim tu use. vegetables, fish, shellfish), and incidental ingestion of soil;
•inhalation of vapors or dus1; and
• dc:rmal cunt.let with water or S(]il.
IDENTIFICATION OF For an c:xposure pathway to be cunsidcred imponam or
EXPOSURE PATHWAYS cmnplete at a site, there must be: a receptor that is expused to
It is i mport.111 t to identify all expos11re pathways and im- contamination via this pathway. A rcccptnr is any organism
portant receptors at a site so health-based cleanup levels tha1 that may be exposed to the contamination. !n this chapter, re-
are protective of all 11 me ntial receptors can be developed. ceptor refers w any human (for example, trespasser, school-
Table 2 summarizes potential exposure pathways for hu- child, area residem, c1 c.) whu m igh 1 be expused to
man receptors at a typical si1c. Expo~mc pathways are iden· siie-related contaminants by <me or more pa1hways.
tificd within each 11 crtinent exposure scenario. There are
several exposure scenarios that may be applicahle at a given DETERMINING ACTION LEVELS FROM
facility. Those most commonly evaluated arc the ind11s1rial TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
and residential exposure scenarios. The residential scenario is
1hc more cun~crv<Hive of the tW(] (1 hat is, results in more pro- Toxicological data fur chemicals liste{l in the proposed
tective cleanup levels). Agricultural and recrc:Jtional scenar- RCRA Corrective Ac1ion Rule (55 FR 30798, July 27, 1990)
io~ may be important dcpc:nding llJHlll facility location and are presented in Table 3 at the end of this cha pter.
idcntificatiou ol sensitive receptors. Most often the residential The ca rcinngenicity (or canccr-causing potential) of a
or industrial exposure scenario is used for developing cleanup chemical is evaluated qualitatively by the weight-of-evidence
levels. H(]wcvcr, if the individual subject to the greatest expo- classilicatinn. The wcigh1-of-evidencc scheme used by EPA is
sure: to site-related cumaminam sis 1he recreational user of a as follows:
nearby stream or lake:, thcn a rccrcational ~ccnario may be A Human carcinogen
sufficiently pruteetive. B Kn(]wn probable human carcinogcn
13
Copyright © 1995 by ASTM International www.astm.org
14 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Con1amina1ed Mediunt Expo,nre Scenario lmpon a111 for Callulatiou n! Cleannp Le1·el'?
soil i1111cs1ion
dermal cnntan 1vi1h
'°ii
inltalatiou of
panilnlates/vnlatiles
lrorn soil
'nil a' pmemial snmle of site· speeilic
rnn!a111ina1inn 10 11rnundwa1~r
BI Limited httman evidence bnt sufficient animal evi- daily ex1rnsurL' tn the human population (including sensitive
dence subgroups) chat is like Iy to be wi thn u t apprecia b1e ri:sk of de le-
112 Inadequate or no human evidence but sufficient an i· ceri:o us effects during a lifetime. The RfD is expressed in mil-
ma! l'vidl'ncl' ligrams per kilogram body weight per day (mg/kg/day). RfD
C Possible lwman carcinogen would normally mean chronic oral reference dose. Hnwever,
D Not classifiable as to lunnan carcinogenidty there are other RfDs, for example, inhalation RfDs (more re-
E Evidence of non-carcinogenicity i:n humans. cently called reference concentrations), and subchronic RfDs.
The carcinogenicity of a chemical ts evaluated qnantitively The RID ts a useful reference level from which to gage the
by a slope factor which is a measure of the relative cancer po· potential adverse health effects of the chem tea I at other dose
tency of a chl'mical. The sin pl' factor represents cbe dose· re- levels. Usually, doses below the RID will not likely cause ad·
SJHlllSe relationship of the carcinogen. SiclJil' factnrs were verse hea ltb eflects and those above the RfD could likely
dc.:rivcd by nsing one of several low dose extrapnlaticm me th· cause adverse health effects. However, it shnuld not be abso-
nds. These mathematical models and prncedun..·s are used tn lutely cnncluded thac all doses below the RfD will be Nrisk-
extrapolate the high doses used in Iahoracory or in freeM and that all doses in excess of the RfD will produce
epidemiologic studies to low doses which cannot be meas- adverse health effects.
ured directly. Usually, the EPA uses the li:nea ri7.ed m ul ti:stage The EPA has evaluated the stabi:li:ty of che RID. RIDs rated
mndel, which incnrpnratl's lnw-dnsl' linearity. There is con- as high conlidence will not likely change in the fiuure be·
siderable uncertainty in che extrapolation methods; therefore cause therl' is rnnsistency h1 the toxic effects observed i:n dif·
che upper 95% confidence li:mi:t of the slope of che resulting ferent animal species, sexes, and study designs, nr in the
dose-response curve is the value used as che slope factor. dose-response relationship, nr the reasons for existing differ·
The slnpe factor is defined as a plausible upper· bound es· ences are well-understood. RIDs rated as low confidence are
timate nf the prnbahility nf a respnme per unit intake of a based on li:mited data, and additinnal information could result
chemical nver a lifetime. In simpler terms the slnpe factor is in a change in the RID.
che excess cancer risk per unit of dose and is expressed as EPA-verifil'd RfDs and slope factors in che Integrated Risk
risk/mg/kg/day. Risk estimates which use slope factors de- lnformaticm System (IRIS) database are the preferred coxi:city
rived from che linearized mttltiscage model are upper-honnd valoes for nse in risk assessments.
estimates, thus the true risk is nm likely rn exceed chis esti· RfDs can he used to dee ermine the action level for non-car·
mate, and may, in faet, be less. The higher the value nf the ciHngrns (systemic toxi:cants) as follows
slnpe factor, the more potent the carcinogen is considered tu Cm= (RfD x W)l(lxA)
be. where
For chemica Is that prnduce health effects other chan can·
cer (i.e .. ncm-carcinogens or systemic tnxicants), there is a
c,,,= actinn level in medium, for exampll', sni:l or ground-
water, with units medium dependent, fnr example,
In w dose level, at which there is no observed adverse effect
soi:l in mg/kg, groundwater in mg/L,
(or NOAEL), i:.e., there is an assumed threshold. For these
chemicals chat cause systemic toxicity, ic is believed thac some RfD reference dose, mg/kg/day,
organic homeostatic, compensatory, nr adaptive mechanism w body weight, kg,
ex is ts that must be overcnme hefnre rnxici t y is manifested. I = intake assumptinn (units are medium dependent,
For example, it would take a lot of diseased liver cells before for example, 2 L/day for drinking water, or a solid
liver fcmction would be deranged. i:ncake of 0.2 g/day, and
The reference dose (RID), developed by che EPA, is che
toxicity value used co esti:mace non-carcinogenic effects. IC ts A absorption factor, dimensicmles<> (often assumed= I).
ba<>ically a subthreshnld dme. It is operationally derived from Slope factor {mg/kg/day)· 1 can be used co decermi:ne the
the NOAEL. che assumed threshold levd. by consistent appli- actinn level for carcinogens as follows
cation of generally order-of-magnirnde nncertainty factors C,. =(Rx Wx LT)/(CSF x!xA xED)
(UF) and modilytng factors (MF). The UFs renect varions where
types af data sets and range up to l 000 (!or example, a UF of
R == assumed risk level, for example, I 0·6 fnr Class A and
I O may he a ssoci:a ted with the use of a nima 1 data). The M Fs
Class B, I o· 5 for Class C carcinogens,
renect the completeness of the overall data ha se and the n um -
ber nf species tested. The M Fs typically range from l to l 0 LT = a ssullled lifeti:me, years,
with a default value nf I. Thus CSF = ca rcinogcnic slope factor, (mg/kg/day)· I, and
RID= NOAEL/(UF x MF) ED expos me dnration, years.
The NOAEL is definl'd as the highest experimentally de-
rived dose at which there is no statisckally or biologically sig· Examples
nifi:canc indication of the tm:ic effect of concern. A chemical
(I) Tolnene i:n groundwater
may however elicit mnre than ane toxic eflect (or adverse
health effect of toxic endpoint), in one test animal or in difler- C". == ((0.3 mg/kg/day) (70 kg adulc))/((2 L/day)( I))
ent tests and ch us will have several NOAELs. The RfD is liased = 10.5 mg/Lor ppmv (parts per million by volume)
on the to:..:ic effect exhiliiting the lowest NOAEL called the (2) Tnluene in soil
critical endpoint (or critical effect}. C, = ( (0. 3 mg/kg/day) ( 16 kg ftve year old child))/
The reference dose (RfD) i<> defined as an estima ce, wic h ((0.2 g/day)( I )(kg/ I 000 g))
uncertainty spanning perhaps an order-of-magnitltde, of the == 24, 000 mg/kg or ppm w (pans per mill ion by weight)
16 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Chlorobenze~~
Chlorotorm 57.55.3 0.01 62
2-Ch Ior op he nol 95-57-8 0.005 D
Chromium (VI) 18540-29·9 0.005 A
Copper cyanide 544-92·3 0.005 D
Cyanide 57· 12·5 0.02 D
Cya~ - 1).1.
Cy~nogen bromide Ii
2,4·D [I
2,4· Dinitrophenol [I
Diphenylamine
RISK BASED CLEANUP CRITE R l A 17
Noncartinogenic Effects,
Inhalation RfD"
Constituent CAS Number (mg/kg/d) Class
National Standards
and Guidelines
The federal government has passed m1mero11s legislative • 70· year liktim e expos me periud.
initiatives direc1ed toward assessment of acceptable levels of In de riving a cl ion kve ls for haza rdo 11s con st it uc n ts in soi I,
contamination in the environment. These i'ncl11de the fol low- the following assumptions were made:
ing: ( 1 ) For hazardous constituents that are knuwn or sus-
• RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) peded to be carcinugens:
• Action Levels in the proposed Corrective Action Rule • snil intake of 0. 1 glday
• Resid11e Concentration Lim its in the BIF (Boiler and In- • 70-kg adnlt
dustrial Furna cc) R nlc • 70-year life1imc exposure period.
• Toxicity Characteristic regulatory levels (TCLP) (2) For hazardm1s constituents other than those that are
• Universal Treatment Standards in the propnscd LDR known or snspccted to be carcinogens:
(Land Disposal Restridion) Ruling • soil intake of 0.2 g/day
• Safe Drinking Water Ac1 • 16-kg child
• Maximum Contaminant Limits (MCLs) • 5 · year c xposu re pc riod for children (aged 1· 6).
• Superfnml Amendments Reauthorization Act (SARA)
•A RA Rs (Applicable or Relevant a nd Appropriate Re·
quircmcnts) RESIDUE CONCENTRATION LIMITS
• Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) UNDER THE RCRA BIFRRULE
•Toxic Substances Control Act Hazardous waste burned in boilers and industrial fmnaces
• PCB spill cleannp reqniremcms. (BI f's) is regulated umkr RCRA Subpart H, 266. 100 throngh
266. 11 2 (refer to 56 FR 7206, Feb. 21, 1991). Residue derived
Imm burning or processing of hazard ems waste in BlFs is not
ACTION LEVELS UNDER RCRA excluded from the dcfinitinn of hazardons waste unless a
CORRECTIVE ACTION number nf reqnircmcnts arc met. One of l hese requirements
Under EPA's propoScll Resource Conservation and Rccnv- is comparison uf tile waste-derived residue cuncen tratinn
ery Act Corrective Action Ruic (55 FR 30798, July 27, 1990), with health- based limits. For nonmetal constituc tllS, the con-
action levels were identified for constitncnts in cuntaminated centrations mnst not exceed the health· based levels specified
groundwater and soil. Action levels were established as the in Ta bk 5. If a health· based Jim it for a constitue nt of concern
maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) fornrnlated under the is n 01 listed in the tahle, then a Jim it of 0.000002 ppmw or the
Safe Drinking Water Act nr, for constitnems fm which MCLs Jim it of detection. whichever is h igher, shall be used. For met-
have not been promulgated, the concentrations presented in al constitucn ts, the concem rations in th c Toxicity Charac-
Table 4. For carcinogens, the actiun level represents an excess teristics Leaching Proccdu re (TC LP) must nm be exceeded.
up pe r bound lifetime cancer risk of one in one million fm
Class A (known) and Class B (probable) carcinogens or one in
one hundred thnusand for Class C (possible) human carcinn- TOXICITY CHARACTERISTICS LEACHING
ge n s d 11 c to conti nu ons com l ant 1i 1ct im<: exposure. Th is pro· PROCEDURE UNDER RCRA
posed rule also indicates that c1m111!a1 ivc risk pused by The final regulations implementing the To.-..:icity Charac-
m ultipk con 1aminan is shonld not exceed a one in ten thnu- teris1 ic (TC) and the Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Proce·
sand cancer risk. For systemic mxicants, the action level rep- dnre (TCLP) were promulgated hy EPA in a final rnle
resents a conccmratiun to which the hum an population appearing in the March 29, 1990 Federal Register (pages
(including sensitive suhgnmps) con Id he exposed nn a daily 11 798-11 877). This rule added 25 organic chemicals to the
basis withotlt appreciable risk of deleterions effects dnring a list of w:..:ic constit11cnts nscd m idemify thmc wastes defined
lifetime. as ha za rdo us be ca use of toxicity an cl est a b!i shed rcgnla to ry
1n d crivin g a ct inn levels for hazardous rnn sti 1t1 ems in levels for thcsl' urganics.
gro11ndwa1er, the folluwing assumptions were made: Prior 10 the final mle, toxicity as defined by an Extraction
•water intake of 2 L/day Procednre (EP) test was one ol four characteristics by which
• 70-kg adnlt a waste conld he defined as ha1ardnns. The EP test, originally
23
Copyright © 1995 by ASTM International www.astm.org
24 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
found in Appendix II of 40 CFR Part 261, consistl'd of a leach- PROPOSED LAND DISPOSAL
ing protocol that sim ulatetl the leaching action that occurs in RESTRICTIONS RULE FOR HAZARDOUS
municipal landfills. Extract [rom the EP test would be com- SOIL UNDER RCRA
11arl'd to criteria (provided in 40 CFR Part 261.24) for 14 toxic
On September 14, 1993 the Environmental Protection
contaminants identified in thl' National Interim Primary
Agency proposed ( 58 FR 48092-48204) "universal treatment
Drinking Water Standards (NIPDWS) to detenninc if the
standards" to replacl' existing waste- and source -specific land
original wastl' was hazardous. The inil ial 14 constituents con-
disposal restriction (LDR) treatment standards for contami-
sisted of B heavy metals, 4 insecticides, and 2 herbicides. The
nated soils prior to land disposal.
regulatory levels for these contarninc;nts were I 00 times th e
In 1984 Congress essentially prohibited the land disposal
NIPDWS.
of untreated hazardous wastes. Over the years, EPA promul·
In the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984,
gated regulations implementing this prohibition as part of its
Congress directed EPA to examine and revist: the EP toxicity
LDR program, 40 C.F.R. Part 268. The LDR program requires
criteria and to identify additiona I haza rdons waste cha ra c-
that all hazardous waste be treated using "best demonstrated
teristics. In response to this requirement, EPA published pro-
avai!a ble 1ech n olo gy" ( BDAT) before the waste is dis posed of
posed regulations in the Federal Register on June 13, 1986,
on land. BDAT can be expressed as either a particular treat-
which would expaml the existing EP characteristics. This pro-
ment method (for example, incineration) or a constituent
posal identified 52 compounds (the existing 14 and 38 addi-
concentration (for example, no more than 5 ppmw or I
tional com pounds) that could ca use a wast<: in be hazardous
mg/L). Under the LDR program, a constituent regulatl'd un-
via toxicity. Additionally, the proposal included the TCLP, a
der the treatml'nt standard for one waste may also be a con-
new version of tile EP tl'St.
stitul'nt regnla ted under trcatml'nt standards for another
As with the original EP regulations, the TC final rule re-
waste. EPA's Septt:mher 14, 1993 proposal addresses this
quired comparison of the liquid waste extract obtained from
problem. The proposed treatment standards arc "universal"
leaching procedures with regulatory levels of specified con-
in that they would establish a concentration limit for each
st it uen 1s to determine if the origi na I waste is hazardous due to
constituent regardless of the hazardous waste in which the
toxicity. The TC constitul'lllS and regulatory levels containt:d
con st it uem is present.
in the final J 990 rule are provided in Table 6.
EPA 's proposal contains nniversa I standards for 200 or-
Tlle regulatory levels for the TC constituents were derived
ganic and mt:tal constiments: one set of standards for wastl'-
using llealth-hased concentration limits, and dilution and at ·
wa ters and another Jor nonwastewaters. For organic
tenuation factors. The healtl1-based limits used in the calcu-
constitllents, the proposed universal standards are expressed
lations were chronic toxicity reference levels taken from one
as total concentration kvds for each constituent. For meta Is,
of three sources:
the proposed universal standards are expre~sed as a level
(I) maximu m contaminant kvels (MCLs) as definl'd in measured in thl' il'achate extract using the Toxicity Charac-
the Sak Drinking Watt:r Act regulations; t<:ristics Lea ch in g Procedure (TC LP).
(2) oral risk-specific doses (RSDs) for carcinogenic com- EPA's Septembl'r 14, 1993 notice also proposes three ap-
pounds using a specilic. risk level of 1 in I 00,000; and proaches for developing alternative LDR standards for con~
(3) reference doses (RIDs) for noncarcinogens. tatninatt:d soils. Each approach would apply to all hazardous
The EPA selt:ctt:d a generic dilution and attenuation factor soils rl'gardless of the type of contaminating hazardous waste
of 100 to calculate the TC regulatory levels. This means the and allow for treatment to kvds above the universal stand-
regulatory concentrations for constit Ul'llls listed in the final ards. The approaches differ primarily in tl1e extent of treat-
rule are I 00 timl's the chronic toxicity levels for these com- ment ea ch ffq uires. Under a11 three approaches, the univl'rsal
pounds. AIthough use of co nsti t ul'n t-specific atten u a ti on fac- treatment standards are proposed as "hase" standards. In the
tors was investigated, time constraints forced EPA to usl' the first a pp roach, EPA is proposing standards with a "ceiling"
generic factor which was considered to he sufficiently conser- one order of magnitudt: (ten times) above the universal
vative to bl' applicahle 10 all toxicity constituents. standard, provided 90% treatml'nt of each constituent sub-
Thl' final rule dekrrl'<l applicability of the TC tu one im11or- ject to treatment is achieved. The second approach is a vari-
tant type of waste and exemJ1tl'd another. First, the EPA Lie- ation of till' first in that EPA is proposing standards with a
fcrred applicability of the TC rt:gu!ations to petrnk um- "ceiling" ont: order magnitude above the universal standard;
comaminated media and debris at sites subjt'ct to the RCRA however, there is no requirement that 90% reduction occur.
Umlerground Storage Tank (UST) cleanup regulations under The third approach proposes an unlimited range of values
40 CFR Part 280. This exclusion is discussed in 40 CFR Part above the universal standard provided 90% treatm<:nt is at-
261.4(b)( I 0) . Secondly, EPA decided to exempt from the fi- tainl'd, unless 90% treatml'nt wouh.l result in a level below
nal ruk certain polych!orinated biphrnyl (PCB) wastes, the universal treatm<:nt standard. Under any of these ap-
which are fully regulated under the Toxic Substances Control proaches, the treated soil would remain hazardous waste.
Act (TSCA) and won!cl he identified as hazardous wastes un- However, satisfying the new LDR would mean the soil could
der the TC ruk (see 40 CFR Part 261.8). The principal reason he disposed of in a properly permitted land disposal unit.
for these two decisions was to avoid regulation of waste~ un- The un ivena I treatment standards for organic and rnl'tal
der m orl' than o 11 e set of rl'q uireme n ts. hazardous constituents are presented in Table 7. The stand-
ards are proposed for both nonwastewaters, for example,
contaminated soil. and wastewatcrs, for example, contami-
nated groundwater.
NATIONAL STANDARDS AND GU/DELTNES 25
N ATIONAL PRIMARY DRINKING WATER uf safety (usually 1O· fold) to account fur cancer effects or is
RE GULATION S based (!TI a cancer risk range of l O· 5 to l O·I> when noncancer
data arc inadequate for deriving an Rm. MCLGs for Category
The Safe Drinkh1g Water Act (SDWA}, as amended in
Ill contaminants are calculated using the RfDfDWEL/RSC ap-
1986, required EPA 10 publish Maximum Cornaminarn Level
proach.
Guals (MCLGs) fur rnntaminants which, in the jndgmelll of
The SDWA directs EPA to srt the MCL as close to the
the Administratur, may have any adverse affect on the health
MCLG as is kasiblc. Based on the statlltory directive Ior set-
of µersons and whiclt are known or amicipa trd tu uccur in
ting MCLs, EPA derives MCLs based on an evaluation ol ( l}
public water systems. MCLGs wnr tu br srt at a level that no
availability and performance of various technologies for re-
known or anticipated adverse health efkcts would orcur, al·
moving the contaminarn. (2) the rnsts of applying thrsc tr ch-
luwing fur an adequate margin of safety.
nu!ogies, and (3} the ab iii t y of laboratories to rneasurr
At the same time EPA 1111lllishrs an MCl.G, which is a
accnrately and consisternly the kvd uf the tontaminant with
nonenforceable hralth goal, it must also promulgate a Na-
available analytical metlrnds. Because compliance with the
tional Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR), whid1
MCL is determined by analysis with approved analytical tech-
includes either ( 1} a maximum cornaminant level (MCL) or
niques, the ability to analyze rnnsistcntly and accurately fur a
(2) a required treatmrnt trchnique. A treatment technique
cuntaminant at the MCL is important to enforce a regulatory
may \Jc set only if it is not econurnically ur tedrnologically fea-
standard. This factor is critica ll y important in determining the
sible to ascertain the level of comarninant. An MCL must be
MCL for contaminants for which EPA sets the MCLG at zero,
set as dose to the MCLG as feasible. Under the SDWA. "fea-
a n um \Jc r which by definition can n either be measured nor
sible" means kasihlc with the use of the best technology,
anained. Limits of analytical detection require that thr MCL
t rea tmcm 1echniq ues, and uther means that the Ad min is t ra -
be set at some level greater than the MCLG for these contami-
tor finds arr a vaila bk, a ftc r r xamina ti on for effectiveness un ·
nants.
der field conditions and not solely under lalmratory
EPA also cv alua t cs the h ea h h risks that arr associated with
conditions {taking cost into consideration). NPDWRs also in·
various contaminant levels in order to ensure that the MCL
dude monitoring, analytical, and quality assurance require·
adequately protects 1rnblic health. For drinking wain con-
ments, and sprcifically, criteria and prncedures 10 assure a
taminants, EPA sets as a g oa 1a risk range of Io· 4 to 10 ·I> excrss
supply of drinking water that dependably complies with such
individual ris k for carcinogens d nring a liktime exposure (ar-
MCLs.
senic is one cxce11 ti on tu this risk range). This policy is consis-
Establishment of a specific MCLG depends on the evidence
tent with other EPA regulatory p rograms that generally target
of carcinogenicity from drinking water exposure or the
this range using the comnvativc mudels that a re not likely to
Agency's noncarcinogcnic reference dose (RfD), which is cal-
undcre~timate the risk. Usually the MCLs fm noncarcino-
culated for each specific contaminarn. From the RID, a drink-
genic con tam i nan ts a re set at the MCLG. Since the un derl yi ng
ing water equivalent level (DWEL) is calculated hy
goal of the SDWA is tu protect the public from adverse effects
multiplying the RfD by an assumed adult body weight (gen-
due tu drinking water contaminants, EPA seeks to ensure that
erally 70 kg} a1 id then di vidi1 tg by an a vc ragr da ii y wa tc r co_n-
thr health risks associated with MCLs for all cmnaminams arc
s ump t ion of 2 Ltday. The DWEL assumrs thr total daily
not significa n 1.
exposure to a substance is from drinking water exposure. The
Part 143 of the Codr uf Federal Regulations (CFR) dis-
MCLG is determined by multiplying the DWEL by the per-
cusses EPA 's National Sec01 idary Drinking Water Reg nla tions
crmage uf thr total daily rxpusure rnntribmed by drinking
(NSDWRs). NSDWRs control contaminants in drinking water
water. called the relative source comri\Jution (RSC). Gener-
that primarily affect aesthetic qualities relating tu public ac-
ally, EPA assumes that the RSC from drinking wateris 20% ~f
cep tance of drinking water. At considera bly higher concen-
the total exposu re, unless other exposure data for the che1111-
trations of contaminants, health implications may also exist
cal are available.
as wdl as aesthetic degreda ti on. The rrgulatiuns are not fed·
For chemicals suspected as carcinogens, the assessment fnr
erall y euforcrable but arc intended as guiddinrs fur the
nonthreshold toxicams consists of the weight of evidence uf
States. The NSDWRs re11resent reasonable goals fur drinking
carcinogenicity in h nmans. The olljectives of the assessment
water q nality. Tile S tatrs may establish higher or !own kvds
are (I) to determine the level or strength of evidence that the
that may be a pp ropria te d epe nde nt u pun Ioca l conditions,
substance is a human or animal carcinogen and (2) to provide
such as unavailability of alternate suurcc waters or other
an upperbound estimate of the possible risk of human expo-
compelling facturs, provided that pulllic hralth and welfare
sure to th e substance in drinking water.
are not adversely affected.
Establishing the MCLG for a chemical is generally accom-
Table 8 provides a list of EPA's current MCLs and MCLGs,
plished in one of three ways depending (!TI its cate_gorizat_i~n.
along with EPA's pruposcd MCLs, MCLGs, and scrnndary
Each con tam ina n t is a 11al yzed for evidence of ca rcmoge nm t y
MC Ls.
via ingestion. In most cases, the Agency places Group A and
B contaminants into Category I, Group C into Category ll, and
Group D and E into Category Ill. However, where there is ad- ARAR s UNDERSARA
ditional infom1a1ion on cancer ris ks frnm drinking water in-
gestion, additiunal scrutiny is rnnductcd, which may result in The Superfuntl Amrndments and Rcaut horization Ari of
placing the contaminant into a different category. . 1986 (SARA} requires that remedia l actions rnmply with ap·
EPA's policy is to set MCLGs for Category I contammants plicable ur relevant and apprnpriate req nircmrnts (ARA Rs)
at zero. The MCLG for Category II contaminants is caiculated of federal laws and, where mure stringern, state laws. What
by using the RfD fD WELf RSC approach wi l h an added ma rgi 11 a re ARARs? Ap11licable requirements arc environmental pro-
26 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
tectiun rl'quirements, criteria, or limi1a1ions that specifically cern to warrant further site-specific study. Con cent rations in
addrrss a hazardous substance, pollutant, contaminant, re- soil above this screening level would not automatically des-
medial action, location, 01 other cirrnrnstancc at a CERCLA ignate a site as Ndi1 ty, Nnor triggcr a response action; SS Ls are
(Comprehensive Environmcntal Response. Compensation not national cleanup lcvds or standards. Rather, they suggest
and Liability Act) site. Relevant and app10pliatl' 1cquirc· thl' need for further eval nation of the 110tential risks that may
meuts add1 css probkms or sit nations so su lliciently simila1 to br posed by site contaminants. Generally, if contaminant
those cncountr1cd at the CERCLA site that thcir 11sc is wdl rnnren tratioDs in soil fall he low the screening level and the
suitcd to the particula1 site. site meets specific rcsidcntial usc conditions. no lurthcr study
An interim guidancl' ducurnent, llublished OD Aug. 27, or action is warramrd for that arr a undr1 CERCLA (Supcr-
1987 (52 FR 32496), provided a definition of ARARs, dc- f und). However. some States have developed screenb1g val-
scrihed thl' diffcrrnt types, and explained huw thry arr ap- ues that a re n10re stringent than the SS Ls. Further study may
plied to tbr rrmedial Jlrocess. For cxamplc, thr guidance be warranted under sn ch Sta 1e p10grams.
st at l's that, for water which is or may be usr d for d rinking, the The SS Ls p1escntl'd in Ta bk 9 have bccn developed using
maxbnnm contaminant ll'vds (MCLs) set under the Safe cxposu1c assumptions for residential land use and cunsider-
Drinking Water Act (SDWA) are generally the applicable ur ing thrrr pathways of exposure to the contaminants:
releva n 1 and a ppropria t c standard. •Ingestion ol soil
Specific ckanu11 criteria (ARA Rs) associated with S1111er- •Inhalation of volatiks and fugitivc dusts
fund sitrs are often developed with site-specific considera-
•Migration of contaminants through soil to an undrdy-
tions in mind including input from the local pop11lation. As ing po1al1le aquifer.
snch, he lore trying to use a specific cleannp level el~cwhcrc,
it is most impo1 tant to review the enti1 e Rec01d uf Drcision
Thrsc pathways have proven to be the most common routes
(ROD) associatrd with the Supe1 fund sitc. This infom1a1 im1 is
of h nman exposure to contaminants in the 1esidential setting
available from EPA 01 on-linl' from WESTLA W® (West Pub-
at haza rdo ns wast c si 1rs cv alu<i tcd by EPA. Also, suhsta n ti al
lish ing Cor]loration, 620 Opperman Drive, Eagen, MN
effort has been madc to devclop widely acccptablc methods to
55723-1308 at 800-328-9352). Once the RODs databasc is
mmkl thrsr particular path ways. The models and assump-
accessed, by sm1 chh1g using certain kcywurds such as the
tim1s used to develop the SSLs are representative of a Nreason-
name of the contaminant, fur cxampk, benzene, all of th e
able maximum exposurcN (RM E) in the residential setting.
RODs containing the keywo1d(s) will be idemified and avail-
SS Ls are generaly based cm a 1Q-6 risk for carcinogens or a
able for review. In tbis way, cleanup criteria can br reviewed
hazard q uotiem of 1 for noncarcinogens. SSLs for protrction
within the cumrxt of the ROD. of grou11dwa1er are based on nonzero maximum contami-
Da 11 t level goal~ ( MCLG~). If 1hese are nol available, maxi-
mnrn contaminant lcvds (NlCLs) a1c used: if MCLs a1c not
SOIL SCREENING LEVELS
availabk, thr risk-based 1argcts are used.
On June 19, 1991, thl' Administrator of the U.S. Environ- For 1he groundwater path way only, SS Ls are part of a four-
mental Protection Agency (EPA) cha1gcd thc Office of Emer- t iered ap1iroach to evaluating soil contaminants that may
gency and Rernedial Response (OERR) with conducting a Ieach 1o ground w atcr. Thc tk rs rdlcct inc1 casing lcve ls of site
30-day s1 udy to outline opt ions fo1 acccle1ating 1he rate of sprcificity and cost but gcnnally drcrrasing kvds of conse1-
dean ups at Nation<il Priorities Lisi (NPL) sites. The study vatisJ)). The first -tier SSLs rely heavily on concentration levels
found that the cu11 ent investigation /remedy selection prnc- derived from mathematical models and nationally based, ge-
ess takes over 3 yra1 s to complete heca nse each site is ti ratcd neric assumptions. 1f con tam in ant levels at a si tc do not ex-
as a unique 1uoblem, requiring thc prcpa1a1 ion of site-specific ceed the first-ticr SSLs and othn sitc cxpusme pathways are
risk asscssm cnts, cleanup levels, and tcchnical solutions. The accoun 1cd fm in the assumptions usrd tu dcrivc thr SS Ls,
study prnposed 1hat stai>dardizing the rrmedial i1 lanniug and 1hen 1he g1 oundw<11 c1 pathway for thl' arca or site is no longer
remedy se 1cct ion procc~s would signil i can 1ly reduce the t imc of concern under CERCLA remedial authority. 1f contami-
it takes to ~tart ckamq1s and would improvc cunsistrncy in nant levels ata sitc equal 01 cxcl'l'd the first-tier SSLs, or other
the approach to site remediation. One of the speci fie propos- pathways of conrnn arc present, a highr1 tkr snccning
als was fo1 OERR 1o NrxaDline the means to develop s1anda1ds analysis may be considered or a lull site investigation may be
01 g11idelinc<, fur contaminated soils.N initiated. The othe1 th1ee tiers arc distinguished by their ap-
On June 23, 1993, EPA announcl'd thc drvclopment of proach to rval uating the soil-10-groundwa1 c1 pathway. Tier 2
Soil Trigger Levels as one uf thc administrative imp10vernents allows sitc-sprcific valurs to replare 1hc gcncric ddaults in
10 the Superf1md p10gram. On September 28, 1993, EPA thr Tkr l partitioning equation, Tier 3 usrs a leach trst, <iml
completed a draft Fact Shcct p1cscnting Soil Screening Levels Ticr 4 involvrs full-scale, site-specific mudding.
(SSLs) (lormcrly known as trigger levels} for 30 chcmicals Table 9 contains draft SSLs for 30 chemicals. The first col-
(U.S. EPA, Draft Soil Screening Lrvcl Guidancc, Officc of umn to the right of the chl'mirnl namr p1 esents values based
Emergency and Rem ed ia l Respunse, PB93-963 SOS, 1993 ), on soil ingcstion. The second col urn n presents the lower of
representing OERR's fim step 1oward standardizing the twu valurs derived to protect for either in hal<ition of volatiles
evaluation and ckanup of coutaminatcd ~oils undrr tht.: or soil pa rt icu la tes. The third column presents the lowest
Comprehensivr Environmental Responsc, Compcnsation, num her of the fii st two culumns and may be used as the SSL
and Liability Act (CERCLA). fur surfacc suils under most rcsidcntial circum stances. For
An SSL is a chcmkal C0>1ce111 ration in soil that 1epresents ~itcs where migration to groundwater is a pathway uf cun-
a level of contamination above which th c1e is sufficicnt cun- cern, SSL values l'or the groundwater pathway apply.
NATIONAL STANDARDS AND CUJDElJNES 27
Three differclll SS Ls address migration of coutaminants to For spills 1hat involve lnw concentrations of PCHs, that is,
groundwater: the selection nf an appropriate SSL fm this less than I lb hy weight, 1h<: soil dca1111p req11ircmcnt is that
pathway depends on severnl site-specific conditions. The first all soil within the spill area mmt he excavated and hack-filled
column of grrnrndwater valne.~ reflects the levels cal Ciliated with clean soil, that is, containing less than I ppmw PCBs.
using a pa rt it ioni ng eq ua ti 011 wi 1h nn correction fact or a<l<l ed For spills that involve high conccntratinns of PCBs, that is,
for dilution and attenuation in the suhstuface (unadjusted). I lb or muri.: by weight, the soil ckanup req11ircments are as
The next two columns reflect 1he level~ adjus1 ed by factors of follnws:
IO and l 00. r<:spectively ( l 0 and l 00 OAF), to accuu nt for ( l ) decontaminating spills in nutdnor c!ectrical substations
such dil11tio11 and attenna1 ion. (restricted access areas}:
Metal partitioning in the mil/water system is significantly •soil clca1111p tn 2 5 pprnw PCBs or, at the option uf
affected by a variety of soil conditiom. 1he most significant of the rcsponsibk party, to 50 11pmw provided a label
which is pH. For this reason, SSLs fnr metals were dcvdnped ur no1ice is visibly placed in the area.
for three pH conditions: 4.9, 6.8, and 8.0, representative of
(2) dcamtaminatb1g spills in other rest rictcd access areas:
national groundwater conditions. Table 9 cnn1ains SSLs for
inorganics corresponding to a pH of 6.8, unkss noted other- • snil clean 11 p tn 2 5 ppm w PCBs
wise. For select in org.:m ics in th is table, S SLs currcspo n ding to (3) demntarninating spills in nonrestrkt<:d areas:
pH values of 4. 9 and 8.0 a re also identified. (Thi.:se prelirn i- •soi I clcan11p tn IO p11111w PCBs, pmvidcd the soil is
nary numhers fnr metals are curren1ly11nder review am! may cxcava1ed 10 a minimum depth nf JO in. (2.54 mm}
h<: revised.) If pH conditions at a site are not known, the SSL and back-filled with dean soil, that is, containing
corresponding to a pH of 6. 8 should be used. kss than I ppmw PCBs.
Spills 1ltat res11I1 in direct contamination of drinking water
so11rces a re excluded from 1he PCB cleanup policy. Th is is
CLEANUP OF PCB SPILLS UNDER
dnne became these sirnations involv<: significant factors that
THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
may nm be adeq11atcly addressed by cka n11p standards based
ACT (TSCA)
upnn typical spill characteristics. EPA 's pnlicy s1a1 cs that sncl1
EPA reg11 Iat ions cont rolling the d isposa I of PCB s we re situations req11irc immediate action tn con1 ain the area of
promulgated 11nder the Toxic Sub~tances Contml Act (Fed- co11 tam ination, and eval u a ti nn of site· spi.:cific ci rc11 rns tances
eral R<:gistt:r, Fch. 7, ! 978, 43 FR 7150 and May 31, 1979. 44 to identify cleanup requirements.
FR 31514). Thi: term "disposal" encompasses accidental a~ A summary of the soil ckanup requirements i~ prl'scnted
well as intentional releases nf PCBs to the envinmment. Un- in Tah!e I 0.
der these reg11lations, rclca~es at or greati.:r than 50 ppmw are
considered to he irnpmpcr disposal of PCBs, and EPA has the
authority under TSCA 1n require action 10 rectify damage nr
cleanup contamination resulting from tile rdi.:asc or spill.
EPA standards for the clean11p of s11illed PCBs have heen
established at the.: EPA Regional offic<: lc\'cl since I 978. Each
region gcnernlly set PCB cleanu11 standards in the form of
guidelines and then applied the g11idelines nn a case-by-case
basis fm specific spill si1 ua1 inns. The general guilklincs and
their applica tiu n to s11ills often difkr<:d amnng Regions. In
certain ~pill sit11a1ions, some R<:ginns required clca1111p tn 50
ppmw. l n o ther s11il! sit 11ations. some Ri.:ginns required
cl eanup to preexisting backgrrn md levels or tht: limit of detec-
tion of PCBs.
A~ a result of an adminis1 rat iv<: decision (General Electric
versus EPA) 011 Jan. 27, 1984, EPA regions bq;an applying a
"lowest pract icahlc level" guideline. Un fort 11 natcly, many
problems were experienced in applying this approach, in-
cluding the fact that it is subject to varied i ntt: rprct a ti on s, can -
not he evenly applied hy the regulated co1111111mity wi 1ho11t
g11idance from EPA, and is snbject to disagreement with those
rcspnnsib!e for the PCB cleanup.
EPA recogni1.ed that setting a nationwide PCB ckan11p
policy was a di.:sirahle goal and in 1ht: winter of 1984, EPA
produced a draft Compliance Monitoring Prugram Policy cov-
ering PCB spill clea 1111p. Although never officially released,
the policy was acq11ired and reviewed by 111any individ11als
and organizatinns. On April 2, 1987 (Federal Register I 0688}
EPA publish<:d its final PCB spill cleanup 1ulicy establishing
requireme-nts for the cleanup of materials containing PCl3s a 1
concentrations of 50 ppmw or greater.
28 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Soil Groundwater
Soil Groundwater
Soil Groundwater
IBa1ium
Benzene
B:_ryllium
7440-39·3
71-43·2
7440-41· 7
100.0
0.5
0.007
Basis MCL
Basis MCL
Basts RSD
Cadmium 7440-43-9 1.0 Basis MCL
Cai oon tet1achlo1 ide 56-23-5 0 .5 Basts MCL
Chlo1dane 57. 74-9 0 .03 Basis RSD
Ch lo 1obenzene 108-90·7 100.0 Basis RFD
Chlo1olo1m 67-66·3 6.0 Basis RSD
[ch1omiurn 7440.47:3 5.0 Basis MCL
, C1 esol (Total) OO-OO·B7 200 Basis RFD
2,4·0 94.75. 7 10.0 Basis MCL
1.4· Dichlo1ob.enzene 106-46· 7 7.5 Basis MCL
1,2· Dichlo1oethane 107--06·2 0.5 Basis MCL
~·~--~ -
2.4-0initi otoluene l 21-14-2 0.13 Basis RSD
End1in 72-20·8 0.02 Basis MCL
Heptachlor 76-44·8 0.008 Basis RSD
Hexachlo10· 1,3· butadiene 87-68-3 0.5 Basis RSD
Hexachlo1obenzene 118-74-1 0.13 Basis RSD
IHexach Ioroetha ne 67-72-1 3.0 BasisRSD
.ead 7439.92.1 5.0 Basis MCL
ILindane
m-C1esol
58-89-9
HIB-39-4
0.4
200.0
Basis MCL
Basis RFD
1
~Mercury 7439.97.5 0.2 Basis MCL
- -
Methoxychlo1 72.43.5 10.0 Basis MCL
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3 200.0 Basis RFD
Nickel 7440-02--0 70 Basis RFD
N it1 obe nze ne 98-95-3 2.0 Basis RFD
o--Cresol 95-48-7 200.0 Basis RFD
rp:c,fi5o1 105.44.5 200.0 Basis RFD
tPentachlo1ophenol 87--86·5 100.0 Basis RFD
Py1idine l!0--86-1 5.0 Basis RFD
~Selenium 77B2-49·2 LO Basis MCL
,Silvei 7440-22-4 5.0 Basis MCL
Tet1achlo1oethylene 127-18-4 0.7 Basis RSD
Thallium 7440-28-0 7.0 Basis RFD
Toxaphene 8001-35·2 0.5 Basis MCL
T1 ichloroethylene 79-01-6 0.5 Basis MCL
2.4 ,6· T1 ichloi ophenol 88-06·2 2.0 Basis RSD
:2,4 ,5· T1 ichlo1ophenol 95-95-4 400.0 Basis RFD
:2(2 ,4,5-T1ichlo1ophenoicy)
propion i c ac1 d 93.72.1 1.0 Basis MCL
'Vinyl chlo1 ide 75-01·4 0.2 Basis MCL
Vinylidene chlo1 ide 75-35-4 0.7 Basts MCL
11/85: 50 Federal Register (FR), November 13, 1985 7/91: 56 FR, July 1, 1991 - NPDWRs; Final Rule
4186: 51 F R, April 2, 1986 - Final MCLs and SMCLs 7/91: 56 FR, July 18, 1991 - NPDWRs for Radionuclides in
7/87: 52 FR, July 8, 1987 - Final MCLs and MCLGs Drinking Water (proposed)
5/89: 54 FR, May 22, 1989 - Proposed SMCLs 5/92: 57 FR, May 27, 1992 - Drinking Water
6/89: 54 FR, June 29, 1989 - Final MCLs and MCLGs 7/92: 57 FR, July 1 7, 1992 · Final MCLs and MCLGs
6/90: Action level for lead in drinking water, June 21, 1990, MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level
Memorandum from the Office of Emergency and Remedial MCLG: Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
Response and th e Office of Waste Program Enforcement NPDWR: National Primary Drinking Water Regulation
7/90: 55 FR, July 25, 1990 - Proposed MCLs, MCLGs, and NSDWR: Nation al Secondary Drinking Water Regulation
SMC Ls
SMCL: Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level
1191: 56 FR, January 30, 1991 · Final MCLs, MCLGs, and
Proposed SMCLs IT: Treatment Technique
6/91: 56 FR, June 7, 1991 - l\1CLGs & NPDWRs · for Lead &
Copper (Action levels establlshed for lead (0.015 ppm) and
copper (1.3 ppm)
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Groundwater
lCop~< 7440-50-B
57· 12·5 0.2
TI (7191)
(7192)
1.3
0.2
Cyanide
2,4-0 94.75.7 0.07 (1191) 0.07
Oala(!On ._sodium salt 75-99-0 0.2 (7192) 0.2
Oi(2~thylhexyl) phthalate 117-81-7 0.006 (7/92) 0
42 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GRO UNTJWA TER
Table 8 - Cont'd.
Groundwoter Groundwah:!r
Groundwoter
!.
Chloride
4· Dlchlorobenzene
_ .. 2· Dic hlorobenze ne
00-Q0.18
106-46· 7
95-50·1
250
0.005
O.Ql
!NSOWR)
(1191, 5189)
Sail Sail
Sail Soil
Soil Soil
Soil Soil
( 2J Surfaco sol I SS l• '"present tne Iowe r of inge •ti on and i nh• lation va Iues.
Background Concentrations
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
Averoge Range
51
Copyright © 1995 by ASTM International www.astm.org
52 CLEANUP CRITERJA FOR SOJLAND GROUNDWATER
Tobie 11 - Cont'd.
Soil Soil
Groundwater Groundwoter
A B
Constituent CAS Number mg/L Remark s mg/L Remarks
Groundwoter Soil
c A
Constituent CAS Number mg/L Remarks ppmw Remoric:s
Soil Soil
B c
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remarks ppmw Remarks
B c
Constituent CAS Number ppmw ppmw Remarks
/'
rChlorinated organic pest iddes
I (Total)
\ Chlorinated polycylic
~ hydrocarbom 111
\!
t ~h lor.Obf;l)zene~. .!!~ i~. l .. ,
Ch lorobe nzene (Tota I) 00·00·38 20
Chlorophenols {indiv.) 00-00-39 5
Ch lorophe nols CTota I) 00·00-40 J 10
Chromium 7440.47.3 800
Cobalt 7440·48-4 300
t• •••#1T1-'"""'th
1.Copper 7'4'4if'5?'.8:"
l Cyanide (free) 57-12· 5
lCyclohe~anol 108·93-0 [
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
Tobie 13 - Cont'd.
Soil
Moximum Allowoble
Tentotive Allowoble Con~entrotions
•
CLEANUP CRITERIA OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 61
Soil Soil
Maximum Allowable
Tentotive Allowoble Concentrotions
(3) CANADA humans thrn11gll dust and other ro111 es of exposnre would
no1 exceed the acceptable daily intake. Rdn HJ Richardson,
S ugges1 ed soil cl can up guide Ii n es in A!bcrta arc pn: scntc d
G.M., "Inventory of Cleanup Critcrial and Mc.:thods to Scl~c1
in Ta bk 14 for both acidic soils (less than a pH of 6.5) and soils
Criteria," Unpnblishc.:d Report, Comminee on lnd11strial Si1e
with a pH greater than 6.5.
Decommissioning, Industrial Programs Branch, Environ-
Ontario soil clcan11p guidelines arc presented in Table I 5.
ment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA I G2, 1987, 46 pp.
Soil criteria for proposed redevelopment and for Texaco and
The groundwater and soil indicators in Q11ebcc are pre-
Shell Refinery sites are included. The Ontario Ministry of the
sented in Table 16. Canadian clea1111p criteria were 1aken
Environment rcq11ircd that Texaco Canda, Inc. and Shell
from CCME-TS/WM-TREOI 5, IP I 05, Vol. l: The Development
Canada. Ltd. set the soil cleanup criteria to be 11sed in disman ·
of Soil Cleanup Criteria in Canada, March 1990.
tling two oil refineries. Based on an exposure model for hu-
man health, the criteria were set to ensme that the intake by
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
REFERENCE
Riclwnlson. G.M., "!nvcmory of Cleanup Criteria and Methods to Sc·
kct Criteria." Un1mhlishcd Rcpon. Commiuec on Industrial Si1e
Decommissioning. Industrial Programs Branch, !Onvironmcnt Canada.
011awa. Ontario KI A I G2. 4 6 11agcs, 1987.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
Anltmony 7440·36-0 10
Arsenic 7440-38-2 14 25
Barium 7440-39·3 1 000
Beryllium 7440-41·7 5
I
Cadmium 7440-43·9 1.0-6.0 4.0
Chromium 7440-47-3 120 l 000
Chromium (VI) 18540-29-9 10
Cobalt 7440-48·4 20 50
Copper 7440-50·8 100 300
lead 7439.92.1 60 500
Me1cury 7439.97.5 0.5 1.0
Molybdenum 7439.93. 7 4.0 5.0
Nickel 7440·02·0 32 200
Oil and grease 00-00-70 10000
Selenium 7782-49-2 1.6 5.0
Silver 7440-22·4 25
Vanadium (fume or dust) 7440-62·2 250
Zinc (fume or dust) 7440-66·6 220 800
64 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Table 1 S - Cont'd,
Soil Soil
Commerciol / Industrial Texaco/Shell Refinery Site s
Antimony 7440-36-0 25
Arsenic 7440-38-2 50
Barium 7440-39·3 2 000
Benzene 71-43·2 o.o~o .o. 13
Benzo[a]py1e~e 50-32-8 0.004 ·O. 005
Beryllium 7440-41-7 10
Cadmium 7440-43-9 8.0
Chromium 7440-47·3 I 000
Chromium (Vil 18540-29·9 10
Chrysene 218-01·9 470
Cobalt 7440-48-4 100
Copper 7440-50-8 300
Cresci (mixed isomers) 1319· 77.3 700
I
Di{2-et hyl hexy I) pht ha late 117-81-7 70·5 000
1,2· Dlbromoethane 106-93-4 0.000 05
1.4-D lox ane 123-91· I 5.80- 12. 2
Lead 7439.92.1 1000
Me~ury 7439-97-6 2.0
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93·3 52
Molybdenum 7439-98· 7 40
Naphthalene 91.20.3 5400
Nickel 7440-02-0 200
Oil and grease 00-00-70 10 000
Phenanthrene 85·01·8 1870
Selenium 7782-49·2
Silve1 7440-22-4 50
Vanadium (fume 01 dust) 7440-62-2 250
Zinc (fume or dust) 7440-66·6 800
CLEANUP CRITERIA OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 65
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Sail Sail
A B
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remarks ppmw Remarks
jAchloram D0-00-76
!Aldrin + D1eldrin DD-00-75
~Ammonia 7664..41-7
~Anthracene 120-12-7 NID 10
:Arsenic 7440-38-2 20 30
Barium 7440-39-3 200 400
Benzene 71-43-2 NID 0.5
Benzo (a )an th race ne 55.55.3 NIO
Benzo[a ]pyrene 50-32-8 NID
Cadmium 7440-43-9 l.5 5
"earbofucan 1563-66-2
Carbonyl 63-25-2
I
Chlordane 57-74-9
'Chlorinated allphat1cs (mdv.J 00-00-35 NID 5
Chlor[nated al!p_h~~ otal I _......._ -
___
00-00-36 NID 7
Chlorobenzene (Total) 108-90-7 NID 2
Chlorobenzene (indiv. except hexa-) 00-00-37 NID 1.0
Chlorophenols (indiv,) 00-00-39 0.5
Chlorophenols (Total) 00-00-40 1.0
Chromium 7440-4 7-3 100 250
Chromium (Vil 18540-29-9 5
Chrysene 218-01-9 NID 5
'Cobalt 7440-48-4 20 50
Copper 7440-50-8 50 100
'.~Yan id<> (free) 57-12-5 NID 10
Cyanide, complex (total) 00-00-71 5 50
2,4-D 94.75.7
Diaz1non 333-41-5
Dibenzo[a,hlanthracene 53-70-3 NID
D1benzo[a.hlpyrene 189-64-0 NID 1.0
rDimethYI benzo(al an th ra Ce ne 57.9·7:5· NID i:o
!Oiquat biomide 85-00-7
Endrin 72-20-8
66 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Table 16 - Cont'd.
Soil Soil
A B
Con5tituent CAS Number ppmw Remorks ppmw Remorks
Nick.el 7440-02-0 ~
r&.len;um
Silver ![I
Styrene
' ,3,7,8- Tetrachlorod10enzo
dioxin L
Tin
Toluene ~
Total Nitrate/Nitrite
Total Organic Halogens 8
Total PAH 20
l~xapl'leoo 8oo1-:-3:;2
2.4.5· T11chlorophl<n oxyace!ic ocid 93.75.5
Trich rornacetate pesticides 00-00-77 NID 2.0
Xylenes (mixed isomers) 1330-20-7 NID 5
Zme (fume or dust) 7440-66-6 150 500
Soil Groundwater
c A
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remorks mg/L Remork.s
Soil Groundwater
c A
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remarks mg/L Remarks
['"'"'"'"'
Barium
Benzene
7440-39-3
71-43-2
2 000
5
0.05
NIO
Be nzo(a )ant hr ace ne 56-55-3 10 NIO
. - --
Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 10 NIO
Cadmium 7440-43·9 20 0.001
Carbary I 63-25·2 N/D
Carbofuran 1563-66-2 NID
Chlordane 57-74-9 N/D
Chlorinated aliphatics (indv.J 00·00-35 50 NID
Chlorinated ali phatics (Total) 00·00·36 70 N/D
~Ch lorobenze ne n ota I) 108·90·7 20 NID
Ch lorobenze ne (in div. except hex a- J 00-00-37 10 NID
, Chlorophenols (indiv.j 00-00-39 5
-- - - ·-
Chlorophenols (Total) 00-00-40 10
Chromium 7440-47-3 800
Chmmi1.1m (Vt\ 18540-29-9 20
Chrysene 218-01-9 50
Coball 7440-48·4 300
Copper
Cyanide (free) 57.12.5 100
Cyanide, complex (total) 00·00·71 500
2,4·0 94.75.7
Diazinon 333-41· 5
Di bemo[a, h la nth race ne
Dlb~n zo[a, h Jpyrnn e
53-70-3
189-64-0
57.97.5
..,
ID
Ill
DIm eth yIbe nzo(a) an th race ne
Olquat bromide 85-00·7
Endrln 72-20·8
Ethylbenzene
Flu or anth en e
Fluorine (soluble fluoride) ll l
Gas.oline
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexac hlore benzene 118-74-1 L!l
Indeno(2,3-cd)pyrene 193-39-5 I]
Lead 7439.92.1
lindane 58-89·9
Mercury 7439-97·5
~l'<tath\Drt!'<
iM ethoxyc hlor
i Methyl parathion
·3· Methylcolanthrene
I
' Mineral oil
Molybdenum 7439-98-7
Naphthalene 91-20-3
Nickel 7440-02·0
Orga noc hlor i na ted
pesticides (indiv.) oo.oo. 73 5
"o7ganocliforfnated
pesticides (Tolal) Il l
taraqua( 1910·42·5
Parathion 56-38·2
68 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Table 16 - Cant'd.
Sail Graundwater
c A
Canstituent CAS Number ppmw Remcirks mg/l Re mcirks
Groundwater Groundwater
B c
Constituent CAS Number mg/L Remcirks mg/L Remorks
I Cyanide (f1ee)
Cyanide, complex (total)
57-12-5
00-00-71
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
CLEANUP CRITERIA OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 69
Groundwater Groundwater
B c
Constituent CAS Number m g/L Remorks mg/L Remarks
11
TABLE 17 - TENTATIVE
11
TRIGGER
CONCENTRATIONS FOR SELECTED
INORGANICS IN THE
UNITED KINGDOM
COMMENTS
1. All values are for concentrations determined on "spot" 6. Boron determined by standard ADAS method (soluble in
samples based on an adequate site investigation carried out hot water).
before development. They do not apply to analysis of aver- 7. Copper, nickel, and zinc determined by standard ADAS
aged, bulked, or composited samples. methods (extractable by 0.05M EDTA).
2. Many of these values are preliminary and will require 8. The phytotoxic effects of copper, nickel and zinc may be
regular updating. They should not be applied without refer- additive. The trigger values given here are those applicable
ence to the AERE Report R-10366. to the ~worst-case": phytotoxic effects may occur at these
3. If all sample values are below the "trigger concentrations", conccn tra tions in acid, sandy soils. 1n soils of a neutral or al-
then the site may be regarded as uncontaminated as far as kaline nature, phytotoxic effects are unlikely at these con-
the hazards from these contaminants are concerned, and de- centrations.
velopment may proceed. Above these concentrations, reme- 9. Grass is more resistant to phytotoxic effects than are
dial action may be needed, especially ifthe contamination is most other plants, and its growth may not be adversely af-
still continuing. fected at the values specified for boron, copper, nickel and
4. Soluble hexavalent chromium extracted by O.lM HCl at zinc.
37°C; solution adjusted to pH 1.0 if alkaline substances pre- 10. Units are ppmw air· dried soil.
sent.
11. Coal tar values do not take into account the hazard to
5. For boron, copper, nickel, and zinc, the soil pH value is as- skin contact.
sumed to be about 6.5 and should be maintained at this
value. If the pH fall s, the toxic effects and the uptake of
these elements will be increased.
REFERENCE
The Development of Soil Ckannp Criteria in Canada, V"l. 1, CCME·
TS/W M-TREO 1 5, I I' I 0 5, MJ rch l 990,
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil
Trigger Concentrotions•
Soil
Trigger Concentrations•
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remcirks
(5) FRANCE
Rc.:krc.:nce 1Ii resholds for soil con I aminanl s in France are
lllTScllletl in Table 18. The.: informalion was ex 1racted from
The Development of Soil Cleanup Crireria in Canada, Volume I,
CCME·TS/WM·THEOl 5, IP! 05, March 1990.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
Arsenic 7440-38·2 20 40
Ba11um 7440-39-3 200 400
Boion (wate1-soluble) 7440-42-8 20 40
Bromine 7725.95.5 20 40
Cadmium 7440-43·9 2 4
Chromium 7440-47-3 150 300
Cobalt 7440-48-4 30 60
Copper 7440· 50·8 100 200
Cyanide (free) 57· 12·5 l 10
Cyanide (Total) 00·00-79 5 50
Fluo11ne ·(soluble fiuorfde) 1ia2-:-41.4 200 400
Lead 7439-921 100 200
Manganese 7439-96-5 1 000 2000
Mercury 7439.97.5 2
Molybdenum 7439.93.7 ~ 8
N;ckel 7440-02·0 50 100
Phenol 108-95-2 0,02
Polychlo11naled biphenyls 1336-36·3 0.05 l
Selenium 7782-49·2 10 20
Silver 7440-22-4 10 20
Sulfur 7704-34·9 2 20
Tin 7440-31-5 20 40
Vanadium (fume or dust) 7440-62·2 100 200
Zinc (fume 01 dust) 7440-66·6 300 600
CLEANUP CRITERIA OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 73
Soll Soi!
Treatment Threshold Emergency (lmmediote Action)
Threshold
~
~Arsenic .,. ' 7440·38·2
~ Barium 7440·39-3
{ Boron (water-soluble) 7440-42-8
rBrom·rne 7720.95-6
f
t~~~!~~ 111'111111'" .4-1 •• /JJ~u j JJl.I 7440:::..~·~.
Ch<omium 7440-47·3
Cobalt 7440-48-4
Copper 7440-50.S
Cyanide (free) 57-12-5
Cyanide (Total) 00-00- 79
rr1~r;;r;;;;,is'Oiti'i>1e-·11~;;r:&ti> ·rum 'fl//J "778";?:41:4
~ Lead 7439·92· l
~ Manganes& 7439.95.5
~Mercury 7439-97-6
r~~!~~~?•~-~•N I 1111~/J, lu .11 •• r.uJ J.1~~,'~-~:?.
Nickel 7440·02-0
Phenol 108·95-2
Pol ye hlorina te<l b <phenyls l'.BG-36-3
Selenium 7782-49-2
Sil~er 7440-22-4
~·;7;{tur ~,,, 7'704:34._9
jTin 7440-31·5
(.Vanadium (fume or dust) 7440-62·2
{zi nc (fume or dust) 7440-65-6
Chapter 6: State Cleanup Standards and Guidelines
Copyright © 1995 by ASTM International www.astm.org
78 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
ALASKA
STATUS
D Regulation !SJ Guideline
D Exists !SJ Exists 09/26/90
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Avai lability !SJ Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Groundwater to be cleaned up to levels not exceeding the 4. Alternative cleanup levels (ACLs) may be adapted for a
more stringent of the final state or federal mnximum con- site if an approved risk assessment is performed and cleanup
taminant levels (MCLs) for organic and inorganic chemicals. to the levels identified in (1) and (2) is not technically feasi-
2. Total petroleum hydrocarbons {TPH) should be cleaned up ble.
to nond!'.!tectable levels as measured by EPA Method 418.1. 5. Soil Clean up levels are determined on a site· specific basis.
3. For organic and inorganic contaminants that have not Cleanup levels for gasoline contamination may range from
been assigned a final or proposed MCL, cleanup levels 10 to 100 ppmw BTEX, 0.1 to 0.5 ppmw benzene, and 50 to
shou Id be based on criteria cited in EPA's Water Quality Cri- 1000 ppmw gnsoline hydrocarbons (EPA Manual 8015M).
teria 1986 using a health risk factor of 10·6 or one-in-one- Cleanup level for diesel contamination may range from 100
to 2000 ppmw diesel hydrocarbons (EPA Method 8100M).
million.
Cleanup levels for waste oil contamination arc all of th e
above plus 2000 ppmw TPH (EPA Method 418. 1).
REFERENCE
Alaska Depa 1emcm ol En vi ru11mc1 na I Conscrl'alion I nee ri 111 GniJancc
lor Surface and Gro11 ndwaec r Cleanup Levels. 26 Sepe. 1990.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Graundwater Groundwater
Groundwoter G roundwater
·~ ~
11
4
Glyphosate 1071-83-6 0.7
Heptachlm 76-<14-8 0.000 4
He ptac hlor epoxide 1024.57.3 0.000 2
Hexa ch Ior obe nzen e 118-74-1 0.001
Hexa ch Ior ocycl ope ntad ie ne 77-47·4 0.05
Lead
I
·-
N ilrate (as N) 14797-55·8 10.0
N rtrrle (as N) 14797-65·0 1.0
Oxarnyl (Vyda.tel 23135-22-0 02
Pen ta ch Ior op he nol 87-86·5 0.001
Picloram 1918-02· I 0.5
Polychlorinated b~phenyls fa315="3E;~ 0.000-5 PCBs as
decachloro· bi phenyl
Selenium 7782-49-2 0.05 O.Ql
SilVBr 7440.22·<1 0.05
80 CLEANUP CRJTERJA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Alasko Cont'd.
Groundwater Groundwater
ARIZONA
STATUS
0 Regulation jg] Guideline
D Exists ~ Exists 06/01/92
D P roposed D Proposed
0 In Development OSoiI
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
igj Both Soil & Groundwater
ONone D Other
COMMENTS
I. These criteria are health· based guidance levels repre- 4. Guidance levels have not been subjected to Arizona's rule-
senting human ingestion levels that are unlikely to result in making process. They therefore have no official status with
adverse health effects during long-term exposure. respect to enforcement as cleanup standards.
2. Guidance levels are designed to protect against toxic doses 5. Divide soil ingestion health based guidance level (HBGL)
of systemic toxicants and to limit to one-in-one-million (10-fi) by 100 to obtain "worst possible case" involving an individual
the excess cancer risk level for carcinogenic compounds. prone to eating soil.
3. Guidance levels apply only to ingestion of drinking water 6. Site specific risk assessment. can be conducted to establish
and soil. They do not reflect inhalation or direct contact cleanup levels for petroleum contaminated soil. Cleanup
risks. In addition, the soil ingestion guidance levels do not level for TPH in soil is 100 ppmw. Cleanup level for TP H in
take into account each chemical's capability to leach to groundwater is 0.001 mg/L. For other constituents, refer to
groundwater. table.
REFERENCE
H11ma11 Hfa/tl1-Has1d Guidance LfVe/s for tlie /11gesn'o11 of Conta111i11a111s i11
Drinki11g IVataaudScil, Arizona Dcpanmcnl ul f:nviio11111cn1.1l Q11a!i1y,
June l 992.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil
Ingestion HBGL" Ingestion HBGL"
- - -- - ----~
Arizona Cont'd.
Soil Groundwater
'
.Chloramben
,ChlO!dane
133·90-4
57. 74.9
1800
1.0
0.11
0.00003
Chlordimetorm 6164-98-3 1.2 0.000 03
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 2 300 0.14
Chloroform 67·66·3 220 0.005 7
Ch lorometha ne 74-87·3 47 0.002 8
2 ·Ch lorop hen ol 95-57·8 580 0.035
'.chlOrothalonil 1897·45.'.6 470' 0.012
1Chlorpyrrros 2921-88-2 350 0.021
~Chlorsull uron 54902·72-3 5800 0.35
'ch1omium 7440-47-3 l 700 0.1
I
Chrysene 218-01·9 0.11 0.000 003
•
STATE Cl.EANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 83
Soil Groundwater
Soil Groundwoter
Soil Groundwater
Arizona Cont'd.
Soil Groundwater
Ingestion HGBL • Ingestion HBGL •
Con5tituent CAS Numbe r ppmw Remarks mg/L Remorks
ARKANSAS
STATUS
0 Ret,"Ulation ~Guideline
D Exists ~ Exists 00/00/88
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
~ Both Soil & Groundwater
O None D Other
COMMENTS
Arkansas uses site specific cleanup levels for soil and
groundwater.
REFERENCE
Personal Communi<'alion whh Mr. Jerry Delazan of Arkans,1~ Do:JMH-
mcn1 of Pol1111inn ConJrol and Ecology. 30 July, 1993.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
Constituent CAS Number mg/L Remarks ppmw Remarks
CALIFORNIA
STATUS
D R e gulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
!RI None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Comply with EPA guidelines for risk assessment at Super- 3. For hydrocarbon contaminanted soil, such as from gaso-
fund sites. line spills, cleanup levels typically range from 0.3 to 1 ppmw
2. Cleanup levels arc site-specific. California has 9 regional for benzene, 0.3 to 50 ppmw for toluene, 1 to 50 ppmw for
boards th roughout the state and 107 local agencies. Each ju- ethylbenzcne, and 1 to 50 ppmw for xylene (all by EPA
risdiction enforces site-specific cleanup levels for the re- Method 8020), und 10 to 10 000 ppmw for total petroleum
gional basins. hydrocarbons (TPH).
4. For hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater, cleanup lev-
els are typically set at the MCL.
REFERENCE
COLORADO
STATUS
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability {g] Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
O None D Other
COMMENTS
I. A compliance standard different from a listed standard 4. Groundwater standards are based on heallh risk assess-
and equal to the background level ofa constituent may be al- ment use a 10·6 incremenlal risk factor.
lowed. 5. Whenever the practical detection level is higher (less
2. lf no numericnl standard exists, regulntory nuthorities stringent) lhan the standard, the practical detection level is
will meet and attempt to reach a consensus. If consensus used ns the perfomrnnce standard.
cannot be reached, the Colorado Water Quality Control Divi- 6. A remedial action more or less stringent than would be
sion will determine the appropriate numerical protection achieved by compliance with these numcricnl stnndards can
level. In setting an appropriate protection level, existing and be selected, or alternative site-specific stnndnrds can be
any reasonably probable future beneficial uses of groundwa- adopted by the Commission, where a dcteimination is made
ter in the area will be considered. that such a variation is authorized pursuant to the applica-
3. The Water Quality Control Commission views remedia- ble provisions ofCERCLA or RCRA.
tion "lo the maximum degree technically and cconomicnlly
reason able" when public health or important environmenlal
resources are impncted. The Commission notes that even
very substantial expenditures may be "economically reason-
able."
REFERENCE
(I) Colorado Dcpamncnt of Hcahh Wal('r Q11ali1y Conuol Co111111b-
~ion,Basic S1andards for Groundwater, Rcgu!a1ion 3.1 1.0. 17 Oc1oher.
1991.
(2) Culura<lo Dcpamncnt of Health Wa!t'r Quali1y Crnnrol C.nmmh·
sion, Cl,,ssifica1iu11s and Water QttJli!y S1an<lMds lor Grn11nrlwa1cr.
Regulalion 3. I 2.0, 19 Sq11., 199 ! .
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Graundwater Graundwater
Groundwoter Groundwater
N· Nitrosop)rrolidine
~ itrate (as N)
86·30·6
930-55·2
14797-55·8
0.004 9
0.000 016
10
Rocky Flats Aquifer
Rocky Flats Aquifer
as N
0.01
0.01
CONNECTICUT
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D E xists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
COMMENTS
(1) Soil remediation standards being developed to: (e) If numeric criteria are lower than what can be reliably
(a) protect human health and the environment from direct and accurately analyzed, analyticnl limits of detection
exposure to pollutants in contaminated soil (Direct Ex- will serve as cleanup criteria.
posure Soil Cleanup Criteria} (D Excavated contaminated soil can ht!:
• residential land use criteria • treated on-site or off-site to met!t soil cleanup crite-
• industrial land use criteria ria and reused on· site
(b) protect groundwater quality from pollutants that mi- • treated on-site or off-site to background levels and
grate from the soil to the groundwater (Pollutant Mo- nRed on another nonresidential site
bility Soil Cleanup Criteria) (2) Groundwatt!r remediation goals:
• GAA, GAAs, GA areas criteria (a) GAA, GAAs, GA areas-restore to background or, if
• GB area criteria not technically feasible, to numeric criteria making it
suitable to drink without treatment; if below level that
• TCLP analytical test used as basis can be reliably and accurately analyzed, analytical lim-
• GAA, GAAs, GA areas-TCLP compared to drinking its of detection will be cleanup criteria
water criteria (b) GB art!as-site-specific standards will address surface
• GB~TCLP compared to ten times drinking water water protection criteria, health and safety risks, pro·
criteria tecting existing uses of groundwater.
(c) When more lhan one criteria apply, cleanup to more (c) potential surface water degradation due to polluted
stringent criteria would be required. groundwater must be evaluated.
(d) lfnumeric criteria are lower than natural background,
cleanup to less than background would not be re·
quired. ..
REFERENCE
(I ) Dcpan mt.""11 l or F.nvi ronme ma! Prolt""ction Propos('d Revisions w !ht"" (3) ReguJ;uion 19· 13-B l02 Safe Drinking Waler Maxi11111m Comami·
Gro1mdwalcr SCC!ion o[ !he Waler Q11.lli1y $1.1nd.1rds and Critni.l, narn Levels.
April 1993. (4) Drah Propn>cd Groundwa1er Pro1ec1ion Critnia, December 1993.
(2) OcparimcnI u[ 1: 11vironmcmal Protecii<>n Pmpns<i! for 1he Con·
necricu1 Cka n11 p S1.md.1 rd Regulations. April 199 3
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Groundwater
Groundwater Groundwater
• Risk based critorl.a !or rO<ldonllal di lnkln,c waloi. e~sis= 2 lJday wate1 Ingestion ralo, OXJ>O<Ulo lroquoncy
and drinking al 365 da'f'/yoar fo1 70 Y••"· 70 kg •dull l>My wefehl, ano-ln-<>n• mill Ion ta1~•l cancor 1i•k le.ol.
I. 0 hazard IndOl for ""'""""rd nogon<.
DELAWARE
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
[gj None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Delaware uses a site-specific health-risk-based approach.
2. For gasoline-contaminated soil, cleanup levels generally
are less than or equal to 100 ppmw TPH and 10 ppmw
BTEX.
3. For diesel-contaminated soil, cleanup levels generally are
less than or equal to 1000 ppmw TPH.
4. For waste oil-contaminated soils, cleanup levels generally
are less than or equal to 1000 ppmw TPH and 10 ppmw
BTEX.
REFERENCE
P\'r~m1a I corn mu nicJ lion wi I h Mr. KJ rl KJ lbncher ol 1lw Dl·pan me111
of Natural Resources and Environmrnwl Coni rol. 14 July 1993,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
COMMENTS
The table contains existing guidelines for leaking under-
ground storage tank sites.
REFERENCE
District al Columbia Depnnmcn1 of Con~umcrs and Rcgulatnry Affairs
LUST Remediation Policy (no date, not oflicially published).
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
FLORIDA
STATUS
[Z] Regulation D Guideline
[Z] Exists 00/00/90 D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
[Z] Both Soil & Groundwater
O None D Other
COMMENTS
1. These regulations pertain to petroleum contaminated 3. For petroleum contamination other than gasoline, kero-
sites. sene, and mixed petroleum product analytical group con-
2. Groundwater contaminants in G·I and G-11 areas must be taminants, groundwater standards and minimum criteria in
reduced to, or below, numerical target levels in thi;:; table, or Chapter 17-3 apply.
naturally occurring background levels, or other such levels
determined appropriate based upon risk assessment. In G-
Iii groundwater areas, contaminants must be reduced to
background levels or meet the minimum criteria in Chapter
17-3.
REFERENCE
( J) DER Chapter 17· 770 Petrokuin Con!amination Site Ckan- Up Cri·
1eria. February 1'.l90.
(21 DER Cl1ap\("r 17 •775 Soil Thermal Treatment Facilitks, SCJllcmbcr
l'.l'.lO.
11) DER GuidC'lines for As~cs~rnem and Rernedia1ion of Peuolcum
Contamina1ed Soil. M~y 1992.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
Arsenic 7440-38·2 55 5
Barium 7440..39-3 2 750 100
Cadmium 7440-43-9 55 l.O
Chromium 7440·47·3 275 5.0
Lead 7:439-92:1 77 5.0
Mercury 7439.97.5 17 0.2
Selenium 7782-49·2 165 1.0
Silver 7440-22-4 165 5.0
Total Recoverable 00-00-8 10/50 Test Method 3 540/90731
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) Provided total PAH,;; 6 ppmw and VOH
,,; 0.05 ppmw (PAH by 8100. 8250. 8270,
or 8310: VOH by 5030/80 I 0 or 5030/8021)
Total VolatileOrganic 00-00:1 o.·1 test-Method-503018026 or
Aromatics (VOAl 503018021
Groundwater
GEORGIA
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
COMMENTS
1. Comply with EPA regulations in 40 CFR. 3. Georgia cleanup criteria for petroleum hydrocarbon con-
2. Georgia working on soil and groundwater concentrations tamination are site specific, but generally: soil-TPH (100 to
above which reporting is required under Georgia Hazardous 500 ppmw), BTEX (20 to 100 ppmw); groundwater-Benzene
Site Response Act (HSRA) as ammended in 1993. (0.005 to 0.071 mg/L), Toluene (1to200 mg/L), Ethylbenzene
(0.7 to 28.718 mg/L). Xylene (10 mg/L), Benzo(a)pyrene
(0.0000311 to 0.0002 mg/L), Anthracene (100 mg/L),
Chryscnc (0.000031 1 mg/L), Fluoranthene (0.37 mg/L),
Fluorene (14 mg/L), Pyrene (11 mg/L).
REFERENCE
Pcrsonal comm11nica1icn1 wi1 b Mr. Jim McNamara of Department of
Natnral Rt'~ourc~s (DNR), 2 Aug. 1993.
HAWAII
STATUS
D Regulation IZl Guideline
D Exists IZl Exists 08/00/92
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone D Other
COMMENTS
1. For sites where it can be demonstrated by exposure path- 2. Guidelines pertain to LUST sites only.
way risk assessment that there are no existing contaminant
exposure pathways to human and nonhuman receptors, an
exposure prevention management plan for the site can be de-
veloped as an alternative to cleanup.
REFERENCE
Hawaii UST Technical Guidance Manual, DOH lmcrim Recommended
Clt:anup Criteria fnr Soil and Waler, August 1992, pp. 5· 7.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
Drinking Woter Source Nondrinking Weter So urce
- ---
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remarks ppmw Remarks
Groundwater Groundwoter
IDAHO
STATUS
D Regulation [Z] Guideline
D E xists [Z] Exists
D Propose d D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
[SJ Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Comply with EPA regulations. 3. In general, Idaho uses drinking water standards as
2. Clean-up standmds for contaminated soil are established cleanup criteria for contaminated groundwater.
on a site-specific basis. For petroleum contami nated soil
cleanup levels generally are in the 40 to 200 ppmw range for
TP H (gasoline contamination), 100 to 2000 ppmw for TPH
(diesel contamination), 100 ppmw for TPH (waste oil con-
tamination).
REFERENCE
Personal commtmic<Jtirn1 with Mr. Clyde Cudy of th<.' Dl·partmc111 of
Environmcn1al Quality. 15 July l 993.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater
ILLINOIS
STATUS
D In Development DSoil
D Expected Availability 13] Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone D Other
COMMENTS
(1) Groundwater classifications: (3) In Class IV areas, standards are equal io the existing
Class I: Potable Resource Groundwater concentrations of constituents in the groundwater, except
when:
Class II: General Hesource Groundwater
(a) groundwater is within a zone of attenuation, then Class
Class III: Special Resource Groundwater II area standards apply, or
Class IV: Other Groundwater (b) groundwater is in a previously mined area, then Class II
(2) In Class Ill areas, standards for Class I areas must not area standards must not be exceeded, except for TDS, chlo-
be exceeded. rides, iron, manganese, sulfates, or pH (where the existing
concentrations are the standards).
REFERENCE
lllinnis E11vironmc111,1l Pro1cctinn Agency Rrg1il,1tiom, Tillt· 35: i!nvi-
rnnmcmal Prolrction, Subtitle F: Public Watn Supplies. Chaplcr I:
Pullutiuu Cnmrol Hoard. Pan 620, Groundwate r Qu,1!i1y, Novc•Hhn
1991.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwoter Groundwoter
Closs I Class II
Constituent CAS Number mg/L Remarks mg/L Remarks
Illinois Cont'd.
Groundwater Groundwater
Cla ss I Class II
IN DIANA
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exi sts
D Proposed D Proposed
0 In Development O Soil
D E xpected Availability D Groundwater
0 Both Soil & Groundwater
18] None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Soil cleanup standards are site-specific and made on a 3. Cleanup levels for gasoline, kerosene, naptha, and diesel
case-by-case ba~is. contamination in soil generally are :;; 100 ppmw TPH (on-
2. Groundwater must meet EPA maximum contaminant lev- site) or nondetectable for off-site.
els (MCLs) or levels established by a health risk assessment.
REFERENCE
Pnsonal cummunkation with Ms. Margie Thomas of Dcpamnr:nt of
Ell vi rom!lt'ntal Man~gcmcm o n 2'1 A tog. 199 3.
IOWA
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development DSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
lg] None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Comply with EPA drinking water standards for maximum 3. For petroleum hydrocarbon contamination action levels
contaminant levels (MCLs). are 100 ppmw TPH in soil and for groundwater: 0.005 mg/L
2. Soil and groundwater cleanup standards are site-specific. Benzene, 2.42 mg/L Toluene, 12 mg/L Xylenes, and 0.7 mg/L
cthylbenzene.
REFERENCE
PcrsonJI communirJtion with Mr. l'J ul Nl'l~on of llcpJr1mcrn of NJI 11-
ral Resources on 30 July 1993.
KANSAS
STATUS
0 Regulation lg] Guideline
D Exists lg] Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development 0 Soil
0 E xpected Availability D Groundwater
lg] Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. The Kansas Notification Level (KNL) or Alternate Kansa.'> 6. KAL values we1·e chosen with the following priorities in
Notification Level (AKNL) are used to constitute adminif;tra- mi nd:
tive confirmation that groundwater contamination exists. (a) promulgated drinking water standards,
2. The Kansas Action Level (KAL) and Allernative Kansas (b) proposed drinking water standards,
Action Level (AKAL) represent the level at which long-term
expo.<;ure to contaminant concentrations is unacceptable. (cl a lQ-5 can cer risk level, and
3. KNL and KAL apply to all fresh and usable water aqui· (d) human health risk other than carcinogenic.
fers. 7. KNL values are 1110 KAL values, except for triha-
4. AKNL and AKAL apply to a ll uvia! aquifer s and/or specific lomethane (THM) KNL values which are their respective
aquifers which sur face through springs or seeps to become quantification levels (detection limits).
contributors to the surface waters of the state. 8. Groundwater guidelines were implemented on 6 June
5. For metals and general physical/chemical parameters, 1988. Soil guidelines were implemented in Aug. 1993.
only a KAL value has been assigned.
REFERENCE
I. K,msa> Dcpanme m of Health and Environment, Division of finvi· 2. Depa rim eu t of l Iea lih and Environmem, Bureau of Environmemal
ronmem, Bureau of Waler Pro1enion. Mem,,randum, 6 JUrtl' 1988, Remediation, Interim Soll Cleanup Standards, A11g11~1 1993.
Fina I Gm u ud waler Comaminalll Targe1 Coneem ra1ions. Final Table of
Chemical Rekrenccs (amended 5 Dec. 1988).
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwoter Groundwoter
Kansas Cont'd.
Groundwoter Groundwoter
.
Chlordane
Ch I oro benze n<
'• II I
Ch 1oroet han e
2-ch Io roet hyl vinyl ether
Chloroform 67-66-3 0.000 5
Ch lore· m· cresol 59.50.7 0.3
Chloromethane 74-87·3 0.000 019
2.Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 0.001 0.160
2·Chlorophenol 95-57·8 0.000 01
4·Ch lorophenyl phe ny I ether 7005· 72.3 0.001
Chlorothaton~ 1897-45·6 0.001 5
Chlorpyrifos 2921-88-2 0.0021 lorsban. Dursban 0.000 041 lorsb<l n. Du rsba n
Chrysene 218·01·9 0.000 002 9
~p~r 7440-50·8 0.026
Cyanazme 21725-46·2 0.000 87 Blad ex
Cyanide 57-12·5 0.005 2
2,4-D 94-75-7 0.010
Dacthal 1861·32· l 0.350
Dalapon, sodium salt 75.99-0 0.056
·Di(2~1-hylhexyl) phlhalate 117-81·7 0.420 0.003
Diazinon 333-41-5 0.000 063
Dibenzo{a,hlanl hracene 53-70-3 0.000002 9
1.2· Oibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 0.000025
STA TE CLEANUP STANDA RDS AND GUIDELINES 109
Kansas Cant'd.
A KN L (Alternate Kansas
KNL (Kansas Natificatian Level) Natification Level)
I
oentac hloroph en oI
Pei meth1 in
Phe nan I hrene
87-85-5
52645-53· I
85-01·8
0.022
0.035
0.000 002 9
Ambush
0.006 3
Groundwater Groundwater
Toluene
Total Organic Volatiles (TOV) 00-00-23 0.01
Toxaphene 8001-35·2 0.000 5 0.000 000 2
1.2 ,4· Trrchlorobenzene 120-82-1 0.001 3
1, I, l ·Trrchloroethane 71-55-6 0.020
l. I .2·Trrchloroethane 79-00-5 0.000 61
Tnchloroel hylene
Trlc hIorofl uorometha ne
2,3,4· Trrchlorophenol
3,4,5-Trlch lorophenol
2 ,~ .6_).i:_rchlorop~e_~o!
2,4, 5· Tric hlorophenol 95-95-4 0.000 I
2(2.4, 5-Trichlorophenoxy)
propionic acid 93. 72-1 0.001
2 ,4, 5-Trrc hlorophenoxyacetic
acid 93. 76·5 0.002 1
TT~ifluralfn i58i"09·8 0.001 7 Tretlan
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 0.000 2
Vinylidene chloride 75.35.4 0.000 7
Xylenes (mixed isomers} 1330-20· 7 0.044
Zinc (fume or dust) 7440-66-6 0.231
Groundwater Groundwater
l\mmonrumsullamate 7773".o6~o'
Anthracene 120·12·7
112 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Kansas Cant'd.
Graundwater Groundwater
Groundwater Groundwater
1,1
cis-1,2· D1chlo1oethylene
trans· 1,2· Dichloroethylene
D1chlo1omethane ftl·UY·L 0.050
2.4· Dlchlorophenol 120-83-2 0.700
2, 6-D le hlor oph enol 87-65-0 0.000 2
3 ,4-Dlchl orophe nol 95-72-2 0.000 3
1,2-Dichlo1op1opane 78-87-5 0.006
Dleld11n a; 1
Diet hyl p htha Iate D
Dimethoate II
Dimelhrin
Dime I hyl phthalate 131· I 1·3 313 0.940
2,4· Dime I hylphenol 105-67-9 0.400
4,6-0init10-o-c1esol 534-52·1 0.013 4
2,4· D1nit1ophenol 51-28·5 0.110
2.4· Din 1t1ololuene 121-14-2 0.001 I
2,6· Oinihololuene
Dinoseb D.
1,4· Dioxane II
Diphenamid ll
L
l ,_2-Diphenyl_hydrazi~.e
Disulloton 298-04·4 0.000 3 Di·Syslon
Diu1on 330-54·1 0.014 6 Karmex
Endosan 1031-078 0.074
Endosulfan 115-29-7 0.052 5 0.000 22
Endothall 145-73-3 0.140
End1in 72-20·8 0.000 2 0.000 18
s-Ethyl
d fp1 opyll h1ocai bamat e 759-94-4 0.140 Eptom, Eiadicane
Ethy Ibenzene 100·41-4 0.680
Ethylene thiou1ea 95.45.7 0.002 4
Fenamlphos 22224-92-6 0.001 7 Nemaev1
Fluome1 uron 2164· I 7-2 0.087 5
Fluo1 anthene 206-44-0 0.000 029
Fluo1ene 86-73· 7 0.000 029
Fluo1 lne (soluble fluoride) 7782-41·4 4
Fonolos 944-22·9 0.014 DYfonate
Glyphosale 1071-83·6 0.700 Roundup
Heptachlo1 76-44-8 0.000 76 0.000 52
Heptachlo1 epoxide 1024·57·3 0.000 38
114 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Ko sos Cont'd.
Groundwater Groundwater
KAL (Konsos Action Level) AKAL (Alternate Kon sos Action Level)
Hexachloio-1,3· butadiene
Hexac h101 oben ze ne
Hexac h101 ocyc lo pen tad iene
Hexachlo1oethane
Hexazinone
I ndeno(2,3-<:d)Pyrene 193-39-5 0.000 029
Iron 7439-89·6 0.30
I sopho10 ne 78-59-1 5.2
Lead 7439-92-1 0.05
L"mdane 58-89-9 0.004
Malathion
Male ic hyd1 azide
Manganese
Mercury II ••
Methomyl
Methoxychlor 72-43-!'> 0 .100 Mar late 0.000 3
Methyl ethyl ketone 73.93.3 0.170
Methyl parathion 298-00·0 0.001 7
2 · M ethy 1-4-<: hlo 1oph enoxyac et1c
-- -
acid
M eto lac hi or
Met1ibuzin
94-74·6
5121S-4s-=-2
21087-64·9
0.003 5
0.105
0.175
Weedone
Dual
Senco1
rrDioclyl phthalate 117-81·0 0.010 0.940
1t-Hexane 110-54-3 14
N Nit1 osodi· n
pro py1a mine 621·64·7 0.010 5.85
N Nitrosodimethytamlne 62-75-9 0 .000 001 4
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86-30-6 0.071
Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.143
Nickel 7440-02·0 0.150
N1t1ate (as Nl 14797-55·8 10
Niiiite {as Nl
N~robenzene
4-Nilrophenol
2-Nili ophenol
, Oryzalin
Oxamyl (Vydale) 23135-22-0 0.175
p-8romod1phenylel her 101-55-3 0.010
Paraquat 1910-42-5 0.031
Pa1athion 56-38·2 0.030 0.000 065
Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 0.220 0.010
1Pe1meth1in 5-264S:-53:"1 0.350 Ambush
I"'~'""'"
85-01-8 0.000 029
Phenol 108-95·2 0.300
1Piclo1am 1918-02· l 0.490 Tordon
P~ych lo ri na I ed bi ph c nyl s 1336-36-3 0.00005 0.002
p,p'· Olchlo1 o
dlphenyl dichlo1oethane 72-54-8 0.000 000 024
p,p'. Oichlo10
diphenytdichlmoelhylene 72-55·9 0.000 000 024
p,p'· Dichlorodfphenyl
trichloroelhane 50·29·3 0.000 42 0.001 l
p-C hlo 1ophen oI lo6-4&9 0.003
j P1omelon 1610-18-0 0.105 P1amitol
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ll5
Groundwoter Groundwoter
KENTUCKY
STATUS
D Regulation 12.l Guideline
D E xists 12.l Exists 08/15/93
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
12.l Both Soil & Ground water
DNone D Other
COMMENTS
1. If contamination is not removed to 1 ppmw PAH, the site 3. Five samples collect.ed from background (upgradient)
must be closed as a residual landfill. must be analyzed separately to complete a background sam-
2. The general cleanup standard for petroleum-contaminated ple set. For statistical determinations, Kentucky uses 90%
soils is background or detection limits. upper confidence interval of the mean using a Student's t-
test. This method i.<i described in SW-846, Vol. II, Chap. 9.
4. Background level criteria are generally used when UST is
in an area considered to be already contaminated.
REFERENCE
I. DEP N01ice 10 UST Owners, Contractors, and Landfill Operators, 3. DEP New Siw 111vc~tigatin11 Om lint" for Dt"tt"rmining the Hmi1m11al
Closure of Heating Oil Tanks, 19 Jan. I 99 3. and Vcnical Ex1cm ol Co111amina1ion Resulting from a Release of a
2. Site Cht"ck Omlin!." for US Ts in KY, D EP, .I 11 \y I 991. Rcg11la1cd Substance from a UST in KY, 15 .Inly 1993, t"lit"c1ive 15 Aug.
1993.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Groundwater
LOUISIANA
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
IZl None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Site-specific cleanup standards arc used. 3. Groundwater typically has to be cleaned up to background
2. Louisianna is currently evaluating the use of cleanup lev- or non-detect levels.
els based on risk assessment. 4. Petroleum-contaminated soil typically has to be cleaned
up to less than 100 ppmw BTEX, and 300 ppmw TPH.
REFERENCE
Personal comm1111ic<11io11 wi1h Mr. Loni> Jolmsnn of 1l1c Dcpanmcm
ol En vi ronmemal Cun~c rv~ ti on on 30 July l 99 3.
MAINE
STATUS
D Regulation [21 Guideline
D Exists [21 Exists 03/00/92
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
[21 Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone D Other
COMMENTS
1. A decision tree is used to determine cle~nup criteria. 3. Intermediate cleanup goals add to the baseline standards
Three levels of remediation standards have been estab- the soil cleanup requirements identified in the table.
1ished. The first and most stringent is for areas of current or 4. Stringent cleanup goals add to the intermediate cleanup
future groundwater use as drinking water. Areas in close goals the groundwater cleanup goals identified in the table.
proximity to public and private drinking water supplies or
sand and gravel aquifers would fall under the most stringent 5. These guidelines apply to sites contaminated by gasoline,
standards. For sites where use of groundwater as drinking methyl tert butyl ether (MTBEJ, kerosene, #2 heating oil,
water is less likely because of its quality and quantity, inter- diesel fuel or other comparable petroleum products.
mediate standards are established. Lastly, baseline stand- 6. Sites contaminated by heavy oils require cleanup stand-
ards are established for all remaining sites, including those ards developed specifically for the site.
where groundwaler has already been contaminated beyond
use. 7. Sites contaminated by other hazardous substances will
also have cleanup standards developed on a case-by-case ba-
2. At a minimum, all sites must have free product. removed, sis using risk assessment.
along with oil "saturated~ soil. This represents baseline
standards and cleanup goal.<;.
REFERENCE
DF.P Pron· du ral G uiddin l"S for Es1a blishing S la m!J rd~ for Rcmc<lia 1io11
of Oil Cont.Jmiu;i)("d Soil ~nd Groundwater. Bm~~u of !1~1~1rdous Ma-
terials and Solid W;i ~!l' (0 111 m!. March 1992.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwoter Soil
Constituent CAS Number mg/L Remarks ppmw Remarks
MARYLAND
STATUS
0 Regulation 0 Guideline
D Exists 0 Exists
D Proposed 0 Proposed
!Zl In Development OSoil
!Zl Expected Availability (1995) 0 Groundwater
0 Both Soil & Groundwater
ONone 0 Other
COMMENTS
Cleanup standards are established on a casc-by-c:oisc basis.
RI FERENCE
Personal comm11nic.:11io11 wi1h T<1sti Oehghni, Dcpanmcm of f:uvimn·
mcm. 14 July 199 3.
MASSACHUSETIS
STATUS
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
ONone D Other
COMMENTS
1. Site-specific risk-based standards are used wilh the intent (2) has a high frequency or intensity of use by children;
that cleanup result in no significant risk. Specifically, in all (3) has a high frequency and intensity ofu;;e by adults;
cases, remediation must be performed to a degree that elimi- or
nates a significant or otherwise unacceptable risk ofhann to
human health, safety, public welfare, and the environment. (b) Soil is potentially accessible and has a high frequency
and intensity of use by children.
2. To the extent feasible, remedial response measures should
attempt to restore environmental quality to those conditions 8 . Soil is classified as S-2 if either:
that would have existed if the release had not occurred. (a) Soil is accessible and
3. Groundwater Category GW-l appliefl: (1) Childs' frequency and use are both low;
(a) the groundwater is within a potentially productive (2) Children are not present at the disposal site and
aquifer (drinking water supply); either (but not both) the adult's frequency or intensity
(b) the groundwater is located within 500 fl. of a private of use is considered lo be high; or
water supply well; (b) Soil is potentially accessible and
(c) the groundwater is within an Interim Wellhead Pro- (1) either (but not both) a child's frequency or intensity
tection Area: of use is considered to be high; or
(d) the groundwater is within Zone A of a Clasfl A surface (2) Children are not present at the disposal site and an
water body; adult'5 frequency and intensity of URe are both consid-
(e) the groundwater is within Zone II; or ered to he high.
(f) the groundwater is located 500 ft or more from a public 9. Soil is classified as S-3 if either:
water system distribution pipeline. (a) Soil is accessible, and children are not present and an
4. Groundwater Category GW-2 applies if groundwater is lo- adult's frequency and intensity of use are both con-
cated within 30 ft of an occupied building or structure and sidred to be low; or
the average annual depth to groundwater in that area is 15 (b) Soil is potentially accessible, and
ft or less. Category GW-2 groundwater is considered to be a
(1) A child's frequency and intensity of use are both
potential source of vapors to indoor air.
considered to be low: or
5. Groundwater Category GW-3 is all other groundwater not
covered in Category GW-1 and GW-2. Groundwater at all (2) a demonstration has been made that children arc
disposal sites shall be considered a potential source of dis- not present at the site, and either an adult's frequency
charge to surface water and classified in Category GW-3. or intensity of use is considered to be low.
6. Category S-1 soils are associated with the highest poten- 10. Soil category S-1 must be selected whenever and wher-
tial for exposure and Category S-3 soils with the lowest po- ever reasonable doubts exi.'>t over lhe selection of appropri-
tential for exposure. The potential for exposure is described ate soil category.
by a quali ta ti ve analysis of the site-specific situation.
7. Soil is classified as S-1 if either:
(a) Soil is accessible, and either
(1) used or may be used for growing fruits or vegetables
for human consumption;
122 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SO//, AND GROUNDWATER
REFERENCE
1. D.EP Management Proced 11 rn for ExcJ va I ed Soils Contaminated 3. 310 CMR 40.09·40.09.33. Ammended 19 Nov. 1993 (MA Contin-
with Virgin Petrole um Oils. Policy No. WSC··100-89, 7 Aug. 1990. geucy Plan).
2, DEP Policy lnr the Ic1vPs1iga1ion, A~scsm1em, and Remccliatinn nl
Petroleum Releases, Interim Site Investigation. Protocol Document.
Policy No. WSC-401-91, 9 April 1991.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater
LI 1
: IJ
iillk'.
[IJlJ2
[uJl)J
...
ll
[I II
ll..ll !;JI
ru»i! :..:.
tl.ll I a
u
u...
[llm
~ I
[I !l!l.I
l:IDllJ
u.
,..
I [I
~ II
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 12 3
Groundwater
GW-1 Standard GW-2 Standard GW-3 Stondard
Constituent CAS Number mg/l mg/L mg/L
G rou ndwoter
Soil
!
Acenaphthyle ne
Acetone
, Aldiln
r. ~.\l,~~~ ~~~~.~,, '"'
Antimony llJ
A1semc
Benzene llJ
Be nzo(a)a nth ia ce ne l!
Benzol a]pyiene 11'
1•/• 11•1 1111-"'l lll - tJ. U{l/IJi/UJfJ/UJUI "'JJJJNIJ
I Benzo(b)fluoianthene
I.Benzo(ghi)peryl ene
IBenzo( k) fI1101 ant hene
f Beryllium
[ Biphenyl,
Bis(2-<:hloroe(hyl) ethe1
Bi s{2-<:h Io 1oisopropy I) eth e1
81ornofo1m
B1omomethane 11
[ ch!o1ofo1m· 67·66-3 II 11
I
1, ~."f.~ !~.1.?P.~.~.ry.o! .................... - ..
Ch1omium 7440.47.3
Ch1om1um (VI) 18540·29· 9
Ch1om1um(lll) 16065·83· l
Chrysene 218·01·9 n) u 11
Cyanide 57.12.5 11 Ull Im
~oi(2~i~'ili-e',;yii'iiiiiiialaie ' "''If. r'"fOCt r111,11111
'f17 '.8'1~7'
,, I LJ
Di ben io[ a, h)an th rac ene 53·70·3 0··i".7,,,
~ n'i b1 omoc hImo methane 124·4il 0.09 "
z
STATF. CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDEUNES 125
Soil
S·l Soil & GW-1 S-1 SoH & GW-2 S· 1 Soil & GW-3
Constituent CAS Number ppmw ppmw
c
1 1,2-Dibromoethane I I J IJ
l ,4-0lch 101 obente'~ ~ ]
r. 1,3- Dichloro0eniene
~ 1,2· 0 ich I01 obenzen,e
?..~.'-~::~.i.~~!~.~~.~.~!~!~~""
D1ch I01 obi omome thane
l .2-Dichlamethane
1.1- Dichloroethane
cis- l ,2- Di ch to1oethylene
t1ans- l .2-Dichloioethylene
z·iS'icfiiO'foOi.i'ilia'rie"" 'II
2 ,4-Dichl oropheno I
1, 2-D1chlomp1opane
.3-Dichlorop1opylene
f1.~.i~~~!!.~."
Die thy I pht ha late
Dimethyl phthalate
2.4- Dimethyl phenol
2 ,4-Dinilrophenol
2 ,4-Dinit10',oluene
. 'f:iid'Cis~f?a
Endrin
~. £th_y\benzene
Fluoranthene
l.ff!-!R!~~~.,, ,,w .J ·'"'·~-~
Heptachlo1 Dl
He pta ch I01 epox 1de n
Hexachlo1 o-l .3-buladiene
Hexac h101 obenze ne [i
Hexachlo1 oethane
li'~'denl){2'.3~1pyrene'"'""'"" ,,..•• • 1
~ lead
·Undane
i Metcury
''-~-~~~-~y-~-~!~! .,,,,,,,.,
Methyl el hyl ketone
Methyl lsobutyl ketone
Methyl me1cury
2-Methyl naphthalene i'
Methyl tert- butyl ethe1
N'iiiih i'iiaiene •
'·Nickel
1~hlo1oani1'1ne
: Pentachlo1 ophenol
I Phe nan t h1ene
.. ................. •1.• 11 h 1nn11ni/JJ/Jlu.1 #
Phenol
Polychlorinated biphenyls
p,p'-D1chlo10
d•phenyl dichlo1oethane •
p,p'- Dichlo10
diphenytd1ch toroel hylene 72-55-9
-,ri:oiciiiiiiQ(JYiliien:ff'
~ II ichlo1oe!hane
rfyrene 1
.29-00-0
~
¥-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----=-~~~~------~~~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~~~-
126 CLEANUPCRITERfA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Mossochusetts Cont'd.
Soll
S-1 Soil & GW-1 S-1 Soil & GW·2 S-1 Soil & GW·3
Constitue nt CAS Number ppmw ppmw ppmw
Soil
S·2 Soil & GW-1 S-2 Soil & GW·2 S-2 Soil & GW-3
Constituent CAS Number ppmw ppmw ppmw
Soil
5·2 Soil & GW· 1 S-2 Soil & GW·2 S-2 Soil & GW-3
Constituent CAS Numbe r ppmw ppmw
• I
Soil
S-2 Soil & GW·l S-2 Soil & GW· 2 S-2 Soil & GW-3
Constituent CAS Number ppmw ppmw ppmw
p,p'· Dichiaro
d1phenyt dichloroethane 72- 54..S 3 3 3
p,p'· D1chloro
d1phenytdichloroethylene 72-55-9 2 2 2
p, p' · Diehl or od i phenyl
trichloroethane 50-29-3 2 2 2
Pyrene 129-00-0 500 2 000 500
Selenium 7782·49-2 2 500 2 500 2 500
Silver 7440-22·4 200 200 200
Styrene t00-42-5 2 20 30
2,3. 7 .8· Tetrachlorooibenzo
dioxin 1746-01·6 0.000 006 0.000 006 0.000 006
11,l, l,2-Tetrachloraethane 630-20·6 0.4 0.5 5
1, l ,2,2· Tetrachloroethane 79.34.5 0.02 0.2 0.6
F etrachloroethylene 127· 18·4 0.5 300 300
Thallium 7440-28·0 30 30 30
-Toluene 108-88-3 90 500 I 000
-
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons {TPHJ 00-00·4 2 500 2 500 2 500
1,2,4· Trichlorobenzene 120·82· l 100 900 800
l, l, l· Trichloroethane 71-55-6 30 500 500
1, 1.2· Tr1chloraethilne 79-00-5 0.3 3 3
Trich Ioroe t hyle ne 79-01·6 0.4 20 too
2.4 ,6· Tr1chlorophenol 88-06 -2 3 60 60
2.4,5· Trichlorophenot 95.95.4 3 2 500 2
Vinyl chloride 75·01·4 0.4 0.3 0.5
Vinyl idene chloride 75-35-4 0.7 0.1 2
iXylenes (mixed isomers) 1330-20·7 800 500 1000
'Zinc (fume or dust) 7440-66-6 2 500 2 500 2 500
Soil
S-3 Soil & GW-1 S-3 Soil & GW-2 S-3 Soil & GW-3
Constituent CAS Number ppmw ppmw ppmw
Soil
5·3 Soil & GW· l 5·3 Soil & GW-2 S-3 Soil & GW-3
Constituent CAS Number ppmw ppmw p pmw
Soil
S-3 Soil & GW-1 S-3 Soil & GW-2 S-3 Soil & GW-3
Constituent CAS Number ppmw ppmw ppmw
MICHIGAN
STATUS
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
IZl Both Soil & Groundwater
ONone D Other
COMMENTS
1. Remediation is required to attain one or more of the fol- 4. Type B numerical cleanup criteria (listed in Table):
lowing degrees of eleanup: Type A, Type B, or Type C. The (al Soil:
degree ofeleanup detected is at the option of the person pro-
posing the remedial action, but it must be approved by the • 20 times the drinking water values are provided for
Department of Natural Resources (DNRl. The regulations convenience and are not mandatory if leachate tests
pertain to Type A and Type B criteria; guidelines for Type C support the use of a higher value.
criteria were implemented 16 July 1993. • For certain materials, such as PCBs, PNAs, and
2. Type A eleanup criteria: some pesticides, which strongly adsorb to soil and
are known not to leach at significant concentrations,
(al hazardous substance concentration not exceeding the direct contact value is acceptable as the soil
backb'Tound cleanup criteria without site-specific leachate tests.
(b) hazardous substance concentration not exceeding the • Rule 299.5711 allows for a value higher than 20
detcetion limit. times the groundwater cleanup criteria to be estab-
3. Type B eleanup criteria: lished as the soil cleanup criteria protective of
(a) Gronndwatcr---conccntrntion of hazardous substnnce groundwater throngh the use of a leach a tc test.
not exceeding (bl Groundwater:
• concentration representing an increased cancer risk • GSl=groundwater-surfacc water interface values.
of 1 in 1,000,000 (when substance is a cru·cinogcn), The GSI values arc the criteria used to judge compli-
• concentration that represents the humnn life cycle ance with Rule 299.5713 and represent groundwater
safe concentration (when substance is not a carcino- criteria that arc protective of surface wa tcr. The GSI
gen, teratogen or mutagen), values in the table are for surface waters not pro-
tected as a drinking water source. Rule 299.5713 re-
• secondary maximum contaminant level (MCL) quires the GSI value not be exceeded at a point
• \eve l that imparts ad verse aesthetic charaetcristics where groundwater naturnlly discharges to surface
to groundwater. water, Demonstration may be made by monitoring at
the interface or by predictive modeling. It is not nec-
(b) Soils---concentrations that: cssnry that the GSI value be achieved throughout
• proteet aquifers, the aquifer.
• protect surface water, • The 20 times GSl value is shown for cases in which
• pose acceptable risk through inhalation, soil is to be rcmediated to that level.
• pose ncceptable risk through direct human contact. 5. For cases in which Type B criteria are less than Type A
criteria, Type A criteria becomes the cleanup goal.
To assure soils do not pose a threat of aquifer contamination,
the concentration of the hazardous substance in soil must be 6. Type C criteria are developed on the basis of site-specific
below that which produces a concentration in leachate risk assessment.
{TCLP) that is equa 1to the higher of the background concen-
tration or detection limit, the groundwater criteria specified
in 3 (a) above, or the lenchate concentration generated by
background soil.
132 CLEAN UP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
REFERENCE
I. Michigan Environmental Res11011se An, i 982 Public Act 307 a~ 2. MIDNR. MERA Operational Memorandum #S, Revision 2 - Type B
amended a11d Administrative Rules, December 1992 (Part 7 Cleanup Criteria Rules 299.5709, 299.5 711 (2), 299. 571 l (5) am! 299. 571'3, 16
Criteria, R 299,5701-5727). July 1993.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Sail
roro[o]p""'
Benzo(b)l luor~nthene
50·32-8
205-99-2
0.180
0.180
Benzo{ghi)p€rylene 191·24·2 930
Benzorc acid 65·85·0 620 l 000 000
Benzo(k)fluornnthene 207·08·9 0.180
Benzy I alcohol 100-51·6 200 110 000 0.44
Ben zy I c \\\midf. l00-44-7 0.004 2 2.3
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 111·44·4 0.000 64 0.350 0.084
:Boron (wat~llitilef
I
744042.-B a:4 16 000
,Bromoform 75-25-2 0.092 50 1.3
: Bromomethane 74·83-9 0.200 110 0.220
~
: Butyl benzyl phthalate 85·68·7 22 41 000
~Cadmium 7440-43·9 0.070 130
Ca proIact am 105-60·2 120 220 000
Carbon disulfide 75· 15·0 15 8 600
Carbon tetrachloride 56·23-5 0.005 4 3.0 0.420
Chlordane 57. 74-9 0.000 54 1.0 0.000 011
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 133
So'1I
Soil
20X Drinking Direct Contac t 20X GSI (Groundwater Surface
Value Volue Water lnterfoce Values)
Soil
.p,p'-Dichloro
diphenyld1chloroethylene 72.55.9 3.8
p, fl· 0 ic hlorod' phenyl
trichloroethane 50-29-3 3.8
Prom eton 1610-18-0 3.0 700
Propachlor 1918-16-7 1.8 3 400
Propazine 139-40-2 3.S 7 000
Propyl alcohol 71-23-8 26 15000
Propylene glycol 57-55-6 2 800 I 000 000
Pyrene 129-00-0 ID 19000
rpyridme 1fo~86-1 0.140 78
.Selenium 7782-49-2 0.700 1300
~S rlver 7440-22-4 0.660 l 200 II •~
~Styrene
,Sulfale
100-42 5
1~808:_7_9;8 5000
0-024 13
"
Tebuthiuron 34014-18-1 9.8 18 000
rert-Butyl alcohol 75-65-0 11 6100
l ,2,4,5-Teirachlorobenzene 95.94.3 48 88000 0.008
2 ,3. 7 .8-Tetr ac hlo rod 1t>enzo
dio~in 1746-01·6 POOll ~ 0.000 000 000 28
I, l, l,2-Tetrachlorocthane 630-20.6 I
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroelhane 79.34.5
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 n
e aa hyd rof uran 109-99-9
tlh ollrum 7440-280
Toluene 108-88-3
Toxaphene 8001-35-2 [I
Triallate 2303-17-5
l ,2,4- Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1
1.1.1· Trichloroethane 71-55-6
1,1,2· Trichloroethane 79-00..5 I I
~T rich Ioroethyle n e 79-01-6 IW I
V rrch IorofIu orome thane 75-69-4
·2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-05-2
~2 .4.5-Trichlorophenol
L. -· - -- -
95-95-4
2(2 ,4 ,5· Trrchlorophenoxy)
propion IC acid 93-72-1
1.2.3- Trichlo1op1opane 96-18-4
Trrchlorotritluoroelhane 76-13· l
Trilluralin 1582-09-8
T ris(2, 3-diblomopropy I)
phosphate 126-72-7
v anadium (fume or dustl 7440.62-2
1Vinyl chloride 75-01·4
~ylidene chloride 75-35--4
Xylenes (mrxed isomers) 1330-20-7
Zinc (fume or dust) 7440-66-6
136 CLEANUP CRITER!A FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Mic'1igan Cant'd.
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
MINNESOTA
STATUS
D Regulation !SJ Guideline
D Exists IS] Exists
D Proposed D P roposed
D In Development D SoiI
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
!SJ Both Soil & Groundwat er
DNone D Other
COMMENTS
1. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) establishes (c) adjustment to levels such that groundwater contami-
groundwater cleanups goals based on a site-specific evalu· nants do not pose an unacceptable risk based on site-
ation of risks and the following: specific risk assessment.
(a) prevention of any further gronndwater degradation 2. Soil cleanup criteria are based on a site-specific risk as-
where recommended allowable limits (RALs) and sessment considering the following routes of exposure: inges-
maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) are not exceeded tion, dermal contact, inhalation, and migration of contami-
or risk is below 1 in 100,000 for carcinogens: nants in soil to groundwater.
(b) remediation to RALs and l in 100,000 cumulntive risk
for carcinogens, or to MCLs, whichever is mnre re;;tric-
tive, for si tes involving groundwater already exceeding
RALs or MCLs; or
REFERENCE
I . i\'\PCA Cu111 pil<J1io11 of G m11 nd water R nles and Rcg11l.ui<111~. S 11pn· 1. Recommended i\llowahk Li111its lor D1inking Wat<:r Curna1ninant~.
I 11 nd l'rngr.:i m. A pp mJ{"h ul Mi 1111c~uta S 11pcrl1111d l'wgra Ill 10 MN Dt""pt. ul llcahh, HeJhh Ris~ As~e~~mt""llt Senion, Release No. 3.
Gmundwa1cr. CleJllnp. 1990. J.:in. 1991.
2. MPCA Mt""murandmn, Site Rcpunse Soil Cka1111p Pmcedmt""s. 28
May 1992.
Contact: Gary Pulford
Office: Solid Waste Division
Agency: Pollution Control Agency
Address: 520 Lafayette Rd.
St. Paul, MN 55155-4194
Phone: 612-296-7290
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater
Recommended Allowable Limits
Constituent CAS Number m g/L Remorks
Groundwater
Groundwoter
p,p' · D1chlorod1phenyl
Prometon
Pron amide 23950-58-5 0.050
Propachlor 1918-16-7 0.090
Propazine 139-40-2 0.010
Prop ham 122-42-9 0.100
Propoxur 114-26-1 0.003
Pyrene
Selenium
Silver ,...
h
144 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOTL AND GROUNDWATER
Minnesota Co nt'd,
G rounclwoter
MISSISSIPPI
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
lg] None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Comply with U.S. Environ mental Protection Agency re-
quirements.
2, For petroleum-contaminated soil, the cleanup level typi-
cally is 100 ppmw TPH and 100 ppmw BTEX, assuming no
sem;itive environmental receptors are present.
3. For petroleum-contaminated groundwater, the cleanup
level typically is 18 mg/L TPH and 18 mg/L BTEX, assuming
no sensitive environmental receptors are present.
REFERENCE
Personal Cnmm1111ica1iun with Mr. Ken Whiucn ol 1hc Dqi.1nmcm of
Envirnnmcmal Qua lily un 3() J 11 ly 1993.
MISSOURI
STATUS
0 Regulation 0 Guideline
0 Exists 0 Exists
0 Proposed 0 Proposed
ISi In Development O Soil
ISi Expected Availability {1994) 0 Groundwater
0 Both Soil & Groundwater
ONone 0 Other
COMMENTS
1. Cleanup standards for contaminated 1,rroundwatcr are site 2. Cleanup standards for contaminated soil are site specific.
specific. For petroleum contamination, groundwater cleanup For petroleum contamination, soil cleanup levels are typi-
levels are typically 5-10 mg/L for TPH, 0.005-0.050 mg/L for cally a maximum of 500 ppmw for TPH, 2 ppmw for BTEX, 2
Benzene, a maxim um of 0.150 mg/L for Toluene, a maxim um ppmw for Benzene, 10 ppmw for Toluene, 50 ppmw for
of 0.320 mg/L for Ethylbenzene, a maximum of 0.320 mg/L Ethylbenzenl"!. and 50 ppmw for Xylene.
for Xylene, and a maximum of0.750 mg/L for total BTEX.
REFERENCE
Person~! rnmmunicJtion with Ms. Karen Northup of tile Dcpartmi::111
of Natural Rcsonrccs mi 2 All!<. 1993.
MONTANA
STATUS
D ln Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
ISi Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone D Ot her
COMMENTS
1. For non petroleum release to soil, the Agency makes a site- 4. In general, the cleanup goal for petroleum contaminated
specific determination of appropriate cleanup criteria. groundwater is the MCL (final or proposed) or background
2. For contaminated groundwater, the Agency follows U.S. concentrations. Background levels for petroleum constitu-
EPA requirements. ents generally will be below detection limits.
3. The following EPA standards apply to conectivc action as- 5. Acceptable TPH may be higher than 100 ppmw in soil for
sociated with releases from petroleum storage tanks: diesel or other heavier fuels.
(a) maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)
(b) toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP), if
the contaminant could be considered a hazardous
waslc.
REFERENCE
Ckanup Guidclinc:s Applicable for Petroleum Rc:k.iscs under 1lw
Mom.mJ UST Progr,1m. MJy 199 2.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Groundwoter
Constitue nt CAS Numbe r ppmw Remorks mg/L Remorks
NEBRASKA
STATUS
IZl Regulation D Guideline
IZl Exists 03/03/91 D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development DSoil
D Expected Avail ability IZl Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
D Nonc D Other
COMMENTS
L Pollutants introd uced directly or indirectly by human ac- 3. Nebraska considers a 1 in 1,000,000 excess cancer risk
tivity will not be a llowed to enter groundwater if the benefi- over a lifetime as; acceptable in health rii;k asllessments.
cial uses of groundwater would be impaired or public health 4. Petroleum contaminated soil cleanup levels are site- spe-
and welfare th reatened; or if beneficial uses of hydraulically cific. Typical cleanup levels are 0.005-50 ppmw for Benzene,
connected groundwaters or assigned uses of surface waters 1-10 000 ppmw for total BTEX, and 10-500 ppmw for TRPH.
would be impaired.
- 2. Numerical standards in the table apply to all groundwater
classes except GC (groundwater assigned to this class is not
being used and has little or no potential for being used as a
public or private drinking water supply). At a minimum in
GC areas, no further degradation is allowed and a site-spe-
cific evaluation is necessary to establish cleanup require-
ments.
REFERENCE
NDEC, Title l l8-Gro1111dwawr Quality S1andard~ and U,t. Cla~,ifirn·
Jion. l Sep!. 1991.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater
Groundwoter
31..~~:~:.~?ns
Toxaphene
l, I, l·Tm:hloroethane
Trichloroethylene
2(2 ,4 ,5-Trichlorophenoxy)
propronic acid 93-72- l 0 .0 5
I. ri'iliaiometfia\ie5' Hofan ""' ,,r,,,.., -00-00-J. ''!//I' "0:10""
,,,~,,
NEVADA
STATUS
[8J Regulation [8J Guideline
[8J Exists 10/09/90 [8J Exists 6/25/92
D P roposed D Proposed
D In Development DSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
[8J Both Soil & Groundwater
DNon e D Other
COMMENTS
1. Existing regulations are for USTs. (c) apply a generic standard of 1 ppmw for Total Volatile
2. Remediation standards for contaminated soils in which Organic (TVO) compounds in soil and 10 ppmw for
groundwater contamination is the primary pathway of expo- base neutral compounds in soil.
sure are determined using the following criteria: 3. MCLs are pertinent remediation standards for contami-
(a) loxici ty characteristic regulatory limits (under RCRA); nated groundwater. However, standards established by
or if chemical is not regulated under this rule other states, EPA guidance, and the Integrated Risk Infor-
mation System ORIS) will be considered in conjunction with
(bl determine if there is a maximum contaminant level site-specific physical conditions.
(MCL) for the compound, and if so, multiply the MCL
by 100 to determine the soil remediation standard; or
if the chemical does not have on MCL, then
REFERENCE
N"DEP Cn111J111inJ1<:d Soil and Gro11ndwacn Remediation Policy. 25
June 1992.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil
NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATUS
D Regulation [Zl Guideline
D Exists [Zl Exists 09/00/91
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
DNon e D Other
COMMENTS
1. For groundwater contami nation, New Hampshire 1·el ics on 3. Virgin petroleum-contaminated soil site remediation goals
EPA's Safe Drinking Water Act Standards maximum con- were determined using the leaching potential analysis for
taminant levels (MCLs). gasoline, diesel, and other fuel oils adjusted for New Hamp-
2. For soil contamination (not related to virgin petroleum shire's hydrogeologic and meteorologic conditions (leaching
contamination), New Hampshiz"e relies on EPA's RCRA potential analysi.c; is described in California Leaking Under·
standards and action levels. ground Fuel Tanh Field Manual: Guidelines for Site Assess-
me11t, Cleanup, and Underground Storage Tanh Closure,
1990).
REFERENCE
New Hampshire Dcpanmem of Environnw111al St'rvkc~ lllll'rim Policy
fur Management of Soils Contaminated from Spills/Rcka":' of Virgin
Pctmkum Prodll<"l5 (Soils Policy), September 1991, as amended 6 Aug.
1993.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remorks
NEW JERSEY
STATUS
lg] Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
lg] Proposed 02/03/92 D Proposed
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
lg] Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. For contaminants not listed in the table, the New Jersey 6. The groundwater cleanup standards for any contaminant
Department of Environmental Protection (NJ DEPJ will de- in a Class llA groundwater area is the cleanup standard
termine soil cleanup standards on a site-specific basis. li.c;ted in the table.
2. Compliance with a soil cleanup standard is achieved when 7. For a contnminant in groundwater that has the potential
the arithmetic mean in a 11 samp Jes in the area of concern is to migrate to Class IIA groundwater where appropriate toxi-
less than or equal to the applicable soil cleanup standard, cological data and a cleanup standard do not exist, the
and no single snmple exceeds the applicnble soil cleanup cleanup stnndard in groundwater is 0.005 mg/L if there is
standard by a factor of more than ten (for a soil standard of sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity (with a to ta 1of such po-
less than or equal to 10 ppmw) or five (for a soil standard 10 tentially carcinogenic contaminants not to exceed 0.025
to 100 ppmw) or two (for a soil standard greater than 100 mg/L), or 0 .100 mg/L if there is no evidence of carcinogenic-
ppmw), and no more than 10% of the soil samples exceed the i ty (with a total not to exceed 0.500 mg/L), or the background
applicable soil cleanu p standard. groundwater concentration for an inorganic contaminant. lf
3. The b'TOundwater cleanup standard for a contaminant that appropriate toxicological data does exist, the Department
has the potential to discharge to FWl, PL, or Category 1 sur- will develop a cleanup standard.
face water is the natural background groundwater concen- 8. The groundwater cleanup standards for contaminants in
tration. all areas that do not have a cleanup standard as identified in
4. l f groundwater has potential to migrate to a sensitive eco- Notes 3 to 7 above are as follows: the standard for an indi-
system, such as wetlands or critical habitat, the cleanup vidual organic contaminant is 1.0 mg/L, the standard for the
standard will be developed by the DEP on a site-specific ba- total of all organic contaminants is 10 mg/L, and the stand-
sis. ard for inorganic contaminants is the background groundwa-
ter concentration for that contaminant.
5. For Class lA and 1-Pinelands (Preservation Aren) grnund-
water, the cleanup standard is the natural {background)
groundwater concentration of the con tam ina nt.
REFERENCE
1. NJ DEP Cleanup Swndi!rds lnr Cnmamina1cd Sites. l'mpos(·d New 2. N.l!JJ:l' Sil<' R,•111Miario11 Nen!, Vol. 5, No. l, April l 993.
Rule~: NJAC 7:260. 3 Fd>. 1992 {New Jcrsq• Register). wilh 1101cd rnr-
rec1 ions bast>d 11 p<111 c rrors iden t ilkd during t ht> \'0111111<·111 lH'rind. as
well as m:w wxicoloslca\ i11forma1iun nhtaincd sine<' the mle proposal
{la~! n:vi~iuu 8 MJrch ! 99 3).
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
Residential - Direct Contact Nonresidential - Direct Cantact
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remorks ppmw Remarks
Sail Sail
Residential • Direct CanlGct Nonresidential · Direct Contact
Nlckel
Nitrobenzene
o-Cresol
,}';(:~~?r.".<'ni1ine , •.
p.Creso
Pen tac hlorophe no I
Phenol
Polychlorinated biphenyls I)
p, p'· D1chloro
diphenyl dichloroethane 72.54. I:'
~ p',p'~b-ich'fo'ro "'
di phe ny Id ich lo ioet hyl ene
p,fi· Dichlorodiphenyl
tr lch! oroe thane u
)' f'.Yrr:ne ttO
Selenium I
Silver • 100
Styrene
l, l ,l ,2- Tetrachloroethane
1, 1,2,2· Tel rachloroethane
..
fToluene
/ T()liJI Petroleum Hydrocarbons
~.!?~.~ !.~ rga~ !c ,~~!~ti!~~- q~~~
Toxaphene [I.
I, 2,4· Trichlorobeniene
1, 1, J. Trichlmoelhane ......
1, 1,2· Trichloroethane
Tr 1c hIoroet hyle ne
Ii
2:4:5. Trid11oroi:iheno1
2, 4, S-T1il:.h\~Qllheno(
Vanadium (fume or dust)
I /, 1., I~ / ,
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUJDELJNES 155
Soil Soil
Soil Groundwater
~~------------
·~
L
156 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR son AND GROUNDWATER
New Jersey Cont'd.
Soil Groundwater
Sail G raundwater
NEW MEXICO
STATUS
D Regulation IZ:I Guideline
D Exists IZ:I Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development O Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
iZ:I Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
Comply with Environmental Protection Agency regulations.
REFERENCE
Pcr-m11al comm11nica1iun with Mr. J-:d Hm5t of the New Mexico Envi·
ronmcntal Dt'paTtrnt'nt Ha1ard,rns and Radioactive Ma1crials B11rt'au
on 15 July 1993,
Contact: Ed Horst
Office: Hazardous and Radioactive Materials Bureau
Agency~ New Mexico Environmental Department
Address: P.O. Box 26110
Santa Fe, NTv1 87502
Phone: 505-827-4038
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Groundwoter
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remarks mg/L Remarks
NEW YORK
STATUS
D Regulation ~Guideline
D Exists ~Exists 11/16/92
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
~ Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. The following alternative bases were used to determine Cleanup objective is based on the criteria that produces the
soil cleanup objectives: most stringent cleanup level using Criteria (a), (b), and (c)
(a) humnn health z·isk assessment using 1 in 100,000 cri- for organic chemicals and Criteria (a), (b), and (d) for heavy
teria for carcinogens; metals. If Criteria {a) and/or (b) a1·e below Criterion (d) for a
contaminant, its background value is the cleanup objective.
(b) human health· based levels for· systemic toxicants, cal- However, cleanup objectives must be, at a minimum, above
culated from Reference Doses (RFDs). An intake rate the detection limit.
of 0.2 g/day over a five-year exposure period for a 16-kg
child is assumed; 2. Soil cleanup objecti\'es calculated by the Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) arc based on a soil or-
(c) concentrations that are protective of grnundwa- ganic carbon content of 1%·and should be adjusted for actual
ter/drinking water quality; organic carbon content if known: (actual organic carbon con·
(d) background levels; and tent, %/1.0%) x (soil cleanup objective).
(e) detection limits. 3. Groundw<i.tcr cleanup criteria are a11plicable for dis-
charges to Class GA waters.
REFERENCE
l. New York $1Jtl' Dq1Jrtmcn1 ol Conservation (NYSDEC) llManluns 2. NYS DJ:C Dr ah Ckan11p Policy am! G11i<klincs. Vol. I and Vol. II. Oc·
Waste: Remediation Division Technical and Atlmini~trJtivc G11idJncc tober 199 l.
Mcmorand11m: D<:11·rmi11atiun ul So'1l Cleanup Objectives aud Cka1111p
Levels, JJWR · 92· 4(M 6, I (1 Nov. I 992.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Groundwater
Soil Groundwoter
~
1Ac1olein
/,
~Acrylamide
1Acrylon it rile
~
.a·BHC
I
t!~:.~!~L
Aldrin
AIlyl chloride
Aluminum (fume or dust)
Ametryn
Aniline
'iifiilirac;ile-"H/lllllllHHlll•
'Antimony
~rsenic lbt
'Atrazine
I .
~~~?..~~:!!'!~!
Barium Pl
Benzene
Benzidine
Be nzo( ala nth race ne
BenzolaJpyrene
:a enzo( f>jnil6r;;ith-en·e
j,
Be nzo( gh i) pe ryle ne
~Ben20ic ac;ll
,Be nzo( klfl uora nthen e
i
Beryllium
Eii·;i 2?i; ioroetll yI) ether
Boron (water -sol ub Ie)
Bromacil
Bromobenzene
Bro moch Ioro methane
·e:;;;n:iofi:iifii"' "H'f"'"' '
STA TE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 161
Soil Groundwater
Canstitue nt CAS Number ppmw• Re marks mg/L' Remarks
'24-D
I '
Dalapon, sod1um f.<111
1
Di(2· ethylhe~yl) phthalate
Diazinon
~Di benzo{a, hla nth1 acen e
Di ben zofuia n
Dib1omochloromel hane
1,2· Dib1omoethane
Dibromomethane
Dibutyl phthalate
'Dicamba
t· .4· Dichloi obenzene ..
~1 ,3·D1chlo1obenzene I Ir
· ,2· Dichlorobenzene
I
3 ,3'-D ic hloroben zid Ine
Di ch Iorn b1 omome thane
1,2· Dichlo1oethane
I, I· Dichlo1oethane
cis· I .2"Dichloroethylene
trans· l ,2-DichJO/m;lhyJene
·rncfilOr"omeliiane
2.4· Dichlo1ophenol
11 ,3· Dichlo1op1opane
11,l· D1chlo1opropene
2, 6-Dich I orotol uene
2,5· Dich 101otoluene
2.3· Dichlo1 otol uene
2.4· Dichlo1 otol uene
3.4 Dichlo1otoluene
Dieldrin
'o fiith'yf P"~ i"li'a; iiie · ~ I
I
Di mel hy\ ph t hal ate
I
2,4·Dinitrophenol
'2.4· Dinit1otolue11e
'
.,
2,6· Dinitrotol uene u
. . . . . . . . ......................... 1 .
Diph enamid
1,2· Di phenyl hydiazine
Endosu Ifan I
Endosulfan II
Endosu lf;m sulfate
,.'F_fld'1'(/.i'
Ethy Ibenie ne
'Fluomettll'Of1
'Fluo1anthem
'f_l_uo:~:i.e.
Fluorine (soluble fluo1 ide)
Heptachloi
He ptac hloi epox ide
Hexachloro· 1,3· bu tad iene
Hexachlo1obenzene
~- He~'ac t.iOi ocyi:'fofiexiiile" .
',_... Hexacmo1 ocyc!oh~xane
r
I
exaC hlorOCyc lopen tad I~ ne
Hexachlo1oethane
,,
Hexachlo1Qphene
,
'Hexazinohe
J62 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
New York C1;1nt'd,
Soil Groundw1;1ter
Soil Groundwofer
NORTH CAROLINA
STATUS
!2J Regulation [Z1 Guideline
D Exists [Z1 Exists
[Z1 Proposed 07/02/93 D Proposed
D In Development O Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
[Z1 Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone D Other
COMMENTS
1. The TPH and oil and grease soil cleanup levels are only 3. Groundwater slandards in the table are for Class GA and
applicable to petroleum-contnminated sites. Where grnund- GSA groundwaters (existing or potential source of d1inking
water has been contaminated or other special site conditions water). These standards apply except if the standard is less
exist, a lower cleanup level may be required by the Division than the suhslance's practical quantitation limit (PQL), in
of Environmental Management (DEM). which case the PQL serves as tht! standard, or where the
2. For non-petroleum contaminated site.-;, soil cleanup levels standard is above natural background levels, in which case
arc site specific. Cleanup is required to be either to back- the background level will serve as the cleanup standard.
ground levels, to a level based on groundwater standards 4. In Class GC groun dwater (usage for purposes other than
(leacha.ble toxicity characteristic leaching procedure [TCLP] drinking), cleanup is required to ensure no further degrada-
levels for contaminants in soils and sediment not exceeding tion of the area and no violations of groundwater or surface
the groundwater standards listed in the table), or to a water quality standards in adjoining waters of a d ifferent
health-based number (using a 1 in 1,000,000 maximum col- class.
lective cancer risk for carcinogens), unless it can be demon-
strated that the concentration of the contaminant in the soil
will not result in a violation of the groundwater standard.
REFERENCE
1. North Carolina Department u[ Enviwnmem. lkahh, and Nat11ral ~ . Pro11osed Am ended Rcg11la1'ton Title l 5A. Subchapter 2L, Groum.I·
Resources. Divi~ion of f:nvironmcn1al Managernen1. Groundwater Sec- water Classifica1ion and Standards, Dralt Ver~ion, 2 July 1993, Rules
tion Guidelines for the Investigation and Remediation of Soils and .0I01-.0202.
Groundwate'r. March 1993 (wl1h .Tnne 1993 Revisions incorpora1ed).
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
Closs GA/GSA
----- --
Groundwater Soil
Class GA/GSA
Groundwoter Soil
Class GA/GSA
NORTH DAKOTA
STATUS
D Regulation lg] Guideline
D Exists !Zl Exists 01/31/92
D P roposed D Proposed
COMMENTS
1. The existing guidelines are for UST-petroleum con lamina- 3. Th e limits in the table arc provided as guidance to
tion. cleanup requirements.
2. Under all circumstances, final cleanup decisions a1·e made
on a site-by-site basis and take into con:;ideration the nature
of the release and the site.
REFERENCE
:-:onh Dako1a Slate Ikpa rmwn1 of Heal!l1 and C:om<•lidalt'<I 1.ah"raW·
rit'~, Di"ision of Wa~tt' Managem t'nt, UST Program, Ckanup Action
Level G nidel i 11c,; for Gn 101 i llt' am! ol Ii t'r l't't ru Il' 11 n1 If rd roca rbons, 31
Jan. 1992.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
Constituent CAS Number mg/L Remorks ppmw Remorks
OHIO
STATUS
D Regulation IZ! Guideline
D Exists IZ! E xists 07 /26/91
D Proposed D Propose d
D In Development O Soil
D Expected Availabili ty D Groundwater
IZl Both Soil & Groundwater
ONone D Other
COMMENTS
1. Contamination is considered present if concentrations of 4. For carcinogens, a 1 in 1,000,000 cumulative excess upper-
pollutants exceed background levels. bound lifetime cancer risk is considered acceptable.
2. If contaminant is not detected in background samples, any 5. For noncarcinogens, cumulative exposures that present a
finding greater than the measurement methods detection Hazard Index of less than 1.0 are considered acceptable.
limit is considered contamination.
3. Once it has been established that contamination exists, it
must be determined whether or not the contamination pre-
sents a threat to public health or the environment.
REFERENCE
Ohio EPA Policy DERR-00· RR-009, llow Clean is Ck.1n. 26 July 1991.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
OKLAHOMA
STATUS
IZl Regulatiqn IZl Guideline
IZl E xists 06/26/91 IZl Exists 05/27 /92
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development 0Soil
D Expected Availability 0 Groundwater
!Zl Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Groundwater standards are applicable to groundwater 3. Oklahoma uses a Remediation Index in determining
used as drinking water. cleanup standards on a site-by-site basis.
2. If soil lead concentration isg:r·eat.er than 100 ppmw, a tox-
icity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) test must be
performed. If the results of the TCLP test are 5.0 mg/L or
greater, the soil is considered hazardous.
REFERENCE
J. Oklahoma Depa rtmcnt ol Environmental Quality (OK DEQ) Regula-
tion 3 J 0:305 ·I· 3, Standards of Inorganic and Organir Chrmical.
Physical, Radiocflcrnical. and Mk1ol>inln~fcal Quallty, 26 June 1991.
2. OK DEQ Drafl Prnccdurc~ for the Disposal of Lead Cmuaminatt<rl
Media in Okla ho ma Sol id Waste Landfills. 27 Ma)' J 99 2.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
Constituent CAS Numbe r mg/L Remorks ppmw Remarks
Groundwater Soil
O REGON
STATUS
COMMENTS
1. In the event of a release of a hazardous substance, the en- 5. At sites where drinking water supplies are threatened, the
vironment is to be restored to the specified numerical soil Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) may require
cleanup levels, if appropriate, or to the background level, un- the groundwater to be cleaned to Federal or state drinking
less remedial actions designed to attain background level are water quality standards (MCLs) or secondary MCLs, where
not feasible, in which case the environment is to be restored available.
to the lowest concentration level in accordance with 340-122- 6. For sites at which groundwater cleanup levels less strin-
090. gent than those listed are being proposed, a risk assessment
2, Background levels are defined as levels before contamina- justifying those levels is required demonstrating adequate
tion took place. protection of public health, safety, welfare, and the environ-
3. Risk assessment must demonstrate that total excess can- ment.
cer risk will not exceed 1 in 100,000. 7, Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8020 or
4. Soil cleanup levels must be achieved unless the responsi- 8240; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons by EPA Method
ble party can demonstrate that groundwater will not be ad- 8310; ethylene dibromide (EDBl and ethylene dichloride
versely affected or that the cleanup level is below back- (EDC) by EPA Method 8010 or 8240; dissolved lead by EPA
ground or the practical quantitation level (PQL). Such Method 7421; total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in water
demonstrations would include: by EPA Method 418.1; and TPH in soil according to OAR
340-122-350.
(a) Soil Leachate Concentrations do not exceed levels in
the table (Note: for inorganic <;:om pounds, the responsi- 8. Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPHl soil cleanup levels
ble party must always conduct a leaching test and generally range from 40-130 ppmw for gasoline contamina-
compare the results to the Soil Leachate Reference tion, and 100-1000 ppmw for diesel fuel oil contamination. A
Concentrations, which cannot be exceeded); or Matrix Score Evaluation must be performed to determine
more precise soil cleanup levels.
(b) Residual soil concentrations will not result in contami-
nant concentrations in the groundwater that exceed
Groundwater Reference Concentrations; or
(c) Soil cleanup level is below background levels; or
(d) Soil cleanup level is below PQL.
REFERENCE
( 1) Or<:gm1 Ad111i11b1ra1i,·o: Ruks, Chap1cr 340, Divi~iou 122, 0<:\1Mt- (2) Ort'gon Deparlmt'nt of Environmemal Quali1y UST Cleanup
mcnt of Environrncmal Quali1y, 340-122-040 1hro11gh 340-122-046, Manual: Cleanup Rule~ for Leaking PcHolrum UST Sys1ems, OAR 340-
Soil Ckan11p Swn<lar<l~. 9 Jnnc 1992. 122-205 through 340-122-260 and Numeric Soil Cleanup Levels for
Motor Fuel and Ht'ating Oil, OAR 340-122-305 1hrough 340-122· 360.
January 1993.
Contact: Jay Collins
Office: Environmental Cleanup Division
Agency: Department of Environmental Quality
Address: 811SW6th Ave.
Portland, OR 97204-1390
Phone: 503-229-6800
172 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soil
If leaching ta graundwater Residen tial - If leaching ta groundwater
is the pathway af cancern is not the pathway_af cancern
-----
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remarks ppmw Remarks
1.--....._,.,............,..,.-,_- ~~~~
~ Acena phthe ne
t, Acrylonitrile
r u·BHC
Aldrin
!Anthracene.~
Bw1we
Benzidine
Benzo(a)an thracen e
Benzo[alpyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene pJ ,
re;;;i;;{'1~Si f~Mnth"eneirt'''
Bis(2-.ehloroethyll eth-
jBromoform .
i Bromomethane
\.C~~bo~. 11;1.~.~'.?~.i.d~...
Chlo1dane
Ch lorobenzene
".
Chlorofoim
Chrysene
2.4-D
~-Oi('2'_j;thJ1h;Yi)'IP'h't'ha·i-ate~UH ····••j••·······''
ll 7·81-7 ''
Oibenw[a,h}anthmcene
j Oi bromochlo ro methane
) 3,3'-Dichlorobenzid.ine
~- o.i.c.~.1.?~.?.b.'. ?.'.11?.i:n.e~ ~.~.
1,2· Dichloroethane i'
ci s. I ,2· Di ch loroeth ylen e
ti ans· l ,2· Dichloroethylene
Dich\oromethane
i,..2,6.
Dieldrin
.... ... _.. ., .. ......... .
,. ,
Dinitrololuene
~ Endosulfan
?, Endrin
l Ethylbenzer.e
t~!~~~~nthe.ne_ ...
Fluorene
Fo1 rnaldehyde .I
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexach lo robe nzene
Ci-iimtilOiae'ffiiine
I. In deno(2, 3-cdlpyre ne
~ '.mwne
~
: _j_
Soil Soil
r~p,p'· Dichlonxtipheny\- ·
I trich loroothane '} ;-
OPyrene
~ Tetrac hIomethy Iene ...
~I~ 1.~ ~~~ omUN'''~ JIHJJ
Toxaphene II
1,1, I-Trichloroethane 1
1, 1,2· Trichloroethane llDJ
Trichloroethylene .ii)
Trichlorofluoromethane
'l 2;4:6-riiCh1ciioptieiiii1"''
, Vi ny! ch lor.ide
Viny!fdene chlor"i
Xyle nes (miMd isomers)
r~~~~...--e....~-~~~~~~~~~~~
Soil Soil
Leachote Reference Concentration
Industrial - (EPA Method 13 11 (TCLP)
If leaching to groundwater or 1312 (SPLP) or other
is not the pothwciy of concern DEQ·approved method)
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remorks mg/L Remarks
1.
Acenaphthene 83-32-9
• Ac rylon it rile )07·13· l 'a ~
i «·BHC 319-BH.i
Aldrin 309·00·2
~..A. nt ~'~~~ ~~ 1 1 ,,,;, "" u JU1111 ..~.?.'.?·.~?:?..
Arsenic 7440-38·2
Barium 7440-39·3
Benzene 71-43·2
Benzidine 92-87·5
Benzofa)anthracene 56-55·3
f'0enzoiiiiPY'r'en e 1
so'.3'i~if
j Benzo{bJfluoranth~~e 205-99·2
Benzo(kJfluoranthene 207-08-9
IBeryllium 7440·41
~.~!.~\.2· c_ry.l.?ri::e.t.~Y!,l. e.t.~.~-~" , ,111111 ""
111·44-"
'•••••••••I.I.ti••••
Bromoform 75-25·2
Bmmomethane 74-83·9
Cadmium 7440.43.9
Carbon tetrachloride 56·23-5
Chlordane 57. 74.9 .
¥C:ii'iO'iO'iienze~e ,,, ' "' ··•11111""'' .,,. foififo'.'i •I
Chloroform 67-66-3 n
Chromium 7440-47·3
Chrysene 218-01"9
~.~?PP.'::.,, J#1
744a-5o.
hillfmulllllldl//J///OJJJmu. -, , ,•• ••. i.
Cyanide 57-12·5
2,4·D 94.75. 7 [I -
Dil2·ethyl hexyl) phthalate 117·81· 7 a
Di be nzol a, h]a nthr ace ne 53. 70·3 (I
Di bromochloromethane 124-48· l l)J
Soil Soil
Leochote Reference Concentrotion
JndustTiol · (EPA Method 1311 (TCLP)
If lec(hing to groundwater or 1312 (SPLP) or other
is not the pathwoy of (Oncern DEQ· op proved method)
Dichlerebromomettume 75.27.4 40
1,2· Oichleroeth anc 107 06--2 60
cis· l ,2·0ichlaroe1hylcnc 156·59·2 20000
lra11s· l,2·Dichlo1octh.ylcne 156·60·5 40000
.~!~.~.'.~'.'?~~~~~.~.~.~ J~:Q~.:?.u ~I///..__ ~, .... (141,,1, .. .,,,,lllllllU•
Dield1in 60·57·1 0.4 0.000 06
2, 6· Din itrotel uene 606·20·2 8 0.000 09
Endosulfan 115.29. 7 100 0.000 03
Endrin 72·20·8 600 0.002
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4 20 000 7
1'Fimthene 2Qi;~i4".'i)"' 'soooo'"
Fl uorene 86·73·7 80000
Fo1mal de h;t<le 50·00-0 200
Heptachlo1 76·44-8
fi:.PJ.~~~~~ 1024.57.3
m'1 ,.?.:~u_., Mfl • ,,,.unllll/ININ'JJIJJ"" 1,,'/,,,11u11111111; •••• 1Jl/l//JJJ/J, •"" o.ooo 02
,.,.,,,. .. ,, 111,n,1 I llJ/~11-IUllllllJJ. '/,
Hexachlorobeniene 118·74·1 4 0.008
Hexach !oroerha ne 67·72-1 2000 3
lndeno(2,3<d)pyrene 193.39.5 0.002
Lead 7439.92.1 2
Lindane 58-89·9 0.002
, M:~g .;rtese '7"faif'9'f(5'
Me1cury 7439.97.5
2-M ethyl-4 ·ch I010 phe noxyacetk add 9 4· 7 4-6 I -
N- Nit1osod i· 11-p10pyla mine 62 ~ · 64-7
K.~~.i.t.~!~~~~Y.1.~~.'!.'.~.."' ,.._ -~~:.~,~;~.
Naphthalene 91·20·3
Nickel 7 440--02-0
Pentac hlorophenot B7-86· 5
Polych.lorinated biphenyls 1336· 36·3
p,p'- Diehl ere
di phenyl di ch I01ee I ha ne
fP. P'· Diehloro
di ph.e nyld ich lo10cth.y len e ...
p,p. Dichle1od1phcnyl
trichloroethane
tr>x~~ne
Silve1
Tetrachleroethylene
Toluene
Toxaph.ene
l ,l.1-T1ichloioethane
"j , i ;2'. 't/;'Cilio"r'OOuia'ric
1~V~Y,~~~aw1m111n- "'"------------
Vi nylidene chlo1ide
Xylenes (mixed isomers)
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES l 75
Groundwoter Groundwoter
Acena~hlhene
Acrylonitrile
83-32·9
107-13· l
•
a:·BHC 31984-6
Aldrin 309.00·2
Anthracene
.. .. . ... u~ ••• ._••• 1 "" 12!))2·.!
Arsenic 7440-38-2
83•ium 7440-39·3 L
Benzene 7143-2 0.005
Benz1dine
Be nzo(a )a nth race ne
92-87·5
56-55·3
• 0.000 1
[Bl~l~/~~1';iPY/rl~rn;"1. '5ti'..'.32."8' '"II' IJIJ/' ..,,,if.ooo'2"'''"""'lf111111"'""Jll
~ Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99·2 0.000 2 '"'
~ Benzo(klfluoranthene 207-0S-9 0.000 2
~ )3eryllium 7440·111-7
PENNSYLVANIA
STATUS
D Regulation 1ZJ Guideline
D Exists l8J Exists 02/00/92
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development 0Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
IZI Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone D Other
COMMENTS
1. Goal of groundwater remediation is to reduce contamina- 4. For remediation activities, protection levels are based on
tion to background quality. the most stringent of promulgated maximum contaminant
2. If it is not possible to achieve background levels, the De- levels (M CLs), (SM CLs), or other environmentally based pro-
partment of Environmental Resources (DER) requires the tection le,·els. If such a level does not exist for a contami-
use of feasible technology that will achieve remediation lev- nant, the DER will develop one on the following basis: non-
els as close to background as possible. carcinogen-apply a margin of safety to the results of
toxicity testing, carcinogen-apply an acceptable risk level of
3. The DE R may also accept remediation to levels less re- one in one million over a 70-year lifetime.
strictive than background if it is not possible to achieve
background levels, but levels must be protective of human 5. The table presents soil cleanup guidance levels for petro-
health and the environment. leum contaminated soils.
REFERENCE
Dep.u1111cm of Environmcmal Resources Gro11!lrlw,11cr Quali1y Protec-
tion S1ra1c~y. Febmar1• 1'>'J2.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remarks
RHODE ISLAND
STATUS
[2] Regulation D Guideline
[2] Exists 05/00/92 D Exists
D Proposed D P roposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability [2] Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Numerical groundwater quality standards and preventive 4. When preventive action limit (PAL) is exceeded, one must
action limits established only for Class GAA and Class GA (a) minimize the concentration of the contaminant in the
areas (where groundwater i>i suitable for public drinking groundwater where technically and economically
without ti·eatment). feasible;
2. Preventive action limits are set at 50% of the numerical (b) regain and maintain compliance with the PAL, unless
gronndwatcr quality standards. it is not technically or economically feas ible; and
3. In Class GB (groundwater designated as not suitable for (c) ensure that the groundwater quality standard is met.
drinking water use without treatment) and Class GC (suit-
able for certain waste disposal practices) areas, Rhode Island 5. When a groundwater quality standard is exceeded, one
Department of Environmental Management (RlDEM) will must take appropriate action to regain and maintain compli-
consider current and proposed future uses, actual and poten- ance.
tial routes for human exposure, persistence and mobility of
the contaminants in the subsurface, toxicity of the contami-
nants, surrounding groundwater quality, uses of surround-
ing property, and hydrogeologic charnctei;stics of the area.
In these areas, the threat to pnblic health and/or the envi-
ronment will be of paramount importance in establishing
clean up crit eria.
REFERENCE
RIDEM Rul"s <l!ld R\'g11JJ1ion~ for Groundwah'r Quality, Cod<." of
Rhod(' Island Rules No. 12-lOO· 006, a; promulgated May 1992 ilrHl
ammemkd July 1993.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwoter Groundwoter
~Asbestos
7440-38·2
1332-21-4
0.05
.
3. 5 million fibers.IL
4~
,_A_tra~~e 1912-24-9
111• . . . . . . . o.~3_ ,.,,, ......,,...,_ 0.001 5 J.
Barium 7440-39-3 2 l
Benzene 71-43·2 0.005 0.0025
Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.005 0.002 5
Carbofuoan 1563-66·2 0.04 0.02
Cao bo n le (1 ac hlor ide 56-23·5 0.005 0.002 5
fchiO"fda ;;e "cfb1W"'
.., ..
f;-;""
~hi 01 obe rtlen e JVO•':JV•/ 0.05
7440-47-3 0.1 0.05
94.75.7 0.07 0.035
I ,~~ibromo-~;.~ hlorol?.:?.~~ne
-'•
96·12·8
..... ·-··~
0.000 ~
"~·1-.••··-··' _, ,, ........
0.000 1
,... ,..}
12 ·Dibromoethane 106-93-4 0.00005 0.000 025
1,4 ·D1chlorobenzene 106-46·7 0.075 0.037 5
I .3· Oichloo obenzene 541-73· l 0.6 0.3
12· Dichlooobenzene 95-50-1 0.6 0.3
1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.005 0.002 5
cis· l ,2· Dkhloioethylene 156-59-2 O.Q7 0..035
trans· 1 ;z. Dichloroethylene 156-60·5 0.1 0.05
1,2· D1chlo1oprop3ne 78-87·5 0.005 0.002 5
Endrin 72·20·8 0.000 2 0.000 1
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.7 0.35
Fluoride 16964-48-S 4 2
Heptachloo 76-44-8 0.000 4 0.000 2
Heptachlor epox1de 1024-57-3 0.000 2 o.ooo l
Lead 7439-92-1 0.0!5 0.007 5
lmdane 58-89-9 0.000 2 0.000 1
Meocury 7439-97·6 0.002 0.001
Methoxychlor 72-43-5 0.04 0.02
Methy I tert. butyl ether 1634-04-4 0.04 0.02
Nitrate (as N) 14797-55-S 10 5
Nitrite {as N) 14797-65·0 0.5
Pentachlorophenol 87-86·5 0.001 0.000 5
Polychlo1 mated biphenyls 1336-36-3 0.000? 0.000 25
Selenium 7782-49-2 0.05 0.025
Styrene 100-42-5 0.1 0.05
Tet 1ach loo oethyle ne 127-18-4 0.005 0.002 5
Tohre11e 108-8&-3 1 0.5
Total Nitrate/Nitrite 00-00-2 lO 5
Toxaphene 8001·35·2 0.003 0.001 5
1, I. I· To ichloroethane 71.55.5 0.2 0.1
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 0.005 0.002 5
2(2,4 ,5:TriChtoropheno~y)
propion ic acid 93. 72-1 0.05 0.025
Trohalomethanes (total) 00-00-1 0.1 0.05
Vinyl chlo11de 75-01-4 0.002 0.001
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 0.007 0.003 5
Xylenes {mixed isomeo s) 1330-20-7 10 5
180 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
SOUTH CAROLINA
STATUS
IZI Regulation D Guideline
1Z1 Exists 06/28/85 D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability IZI Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Class GA-exceptionally valuable groundwater (either ir- 4. Class GC quality standards-no treated wastes, toxic
replaceable, in that no reasonable alternative source of wastes, deleterious substances, or constituents that interfere
drinking water is available, or ecologically vital); Class GB- with any existing use of an underground source of drinking
all groundwaters of the state, unless classified othenvise; water.
and Class GC-groundwaters not considered potential 5. Soil clea nup standards are developed on a site-specific
sources of drinking water and oflimited beneficial use. basis.
2. Class GA quality standards-no treated wastes, toxic
wastes, deleterious substances, or constituents allowed.
3. Class GB quality standards-state primary drinking
water regulations (61-58.5) maximum contaminant levels
(MCLs).
REFERENCE
South Carolina Dcpanmcni 0£ Hcahh and EnvironnH'lllal Control
W;:.ter Classilica1ions an<.1 S1a11dards. Regulation 61-68, and Classified
Waters. Regula1ion (, 1-69, incl nding all a meml1m::ms th rough 28 May
1993.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater
Drinking
Groundwater
/Drinking)
Cons ti rue nt CAS Number rng/L !:l:emarks
SOUTH DAKOTA
STATUS
D In Development D Soil
0 Expected Availability 0 Groundwater
!XI Both Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Numerical criteria are guidelines. 6. Nonvolatile petroleum products include diesel fuels, fuel
2. Remediation or removal of petroleum-contaminated soils oils, oils, and similar substances.
greater than numerical c1-itcria is required. 7. Groundwater notes:
3. If soils exceeding the numerical criteria are lefl i.n place, a (a) Groundwater with 10,000 mg/Lor less total dissolved
monitoring program must be established. solids (TDS) is potentially classifiable as suitable for
4. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) is determined by drinking water. The standards apply to ground wat er
California/USGS method published in ''Draft Method for To- at 10,000 mg/Lor less TDS.
tal Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Total Organic Lead," Feb- (b) Where total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) are less
ruary 1988. than or equal to 10 mg/L and greater than 0.1 mg/L,
5. Volati.le petroleum product.c; include gasolines, kerose n e, and are within the radius of influence of a well or
jet fnel, and similar substances. within a delineated wellh ead protection area, cleanup
must continue until 0.1 m g/Lis met, unless a variance
can be obtained.
REFERENCE
I. Chap1er 74:03:32, Remediaiion Criieria for r~1roll0 1im· Conwmi- 3. Cha[ller 74:03: 15. Groundwa1er Quali1y S1andards, Sornh Dakota
na1ed Soils, IO On. I 990; revi~ed I 0 On. 1991. Dcparc111cn1 ol F.nvirunmenI and Na1ural Resources, revised 1hrough
2. · Drah Mtlhod for Toca I Pe1rolcuni Hydrocarbons iln<l Turn! 01ga11ic 11 Feb. 1992.
Lead,• Fehmary 1988, Hazardous Ma1crials Laboratory, Ciililorni<i De-
pa r1men1 of Heahh 5 ervices, 2151 Berke ky W Jy, Berkeley. CA 90704
(405-540-3003).
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
Co"5titue"t CAS Numbe r mg/L Remarks ppmw Remarks
Acetone 67-64· l
Acrylamide 79-06·1
Alachlor 15972-60·8 0.002
Aldicarb 116-06·3 0.003
Aldicarb sulfone 1646-SS-4 0.003
Aldicarb sulfoxide 1646-88-3 0.004
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 183
~
('rsenlc 7440·38·
At1azine 1912-24·9
;Barium 7440·39-3
I
Benzene 7J.43·2
'Btomoben;zene 108-86· 1
·.. ····~············•·•J J••·•-UJJtttJJ•
Bromomethane 74-83-9
Cadmium 744043·9 0.005
Ca1bofu1an 1563·66·2 0.04
Cai ban le tr ach lo r1de 56·23·5 0.005
Chlo1amben 133-90-4
JJ- •••... ,.,...
.Chlordane
I
Ch I01ober1Zen e II
~
,Chi 01 eel hane
1
Chloromethane 74·87·3
/.
.~~!?~!up 74~~.?.:3 . . 0.1 ..
Copper 7440·50-8 L3
Cyanide 57-12-5 0.75
2A·D 94- 75.7 0.07
Dacthal 1861·32· l
Dalapon, sodium sa1t 75.99.0
~ 2:·oii>r-Omo:3·~·ii1e>;c;;;r-opa'ne ·9&:r2:;r'"' 'o:ooo·f
11,2. DJbrcm0€thane !Of>.93·4 0.000 05
~
'Dicamba 1918·00·9
/1I .4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46· 7
11,3. Dic hlo re benzene
............ •.• J t • • • ' ......... J .. ...~~.~~~; 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50· l 0.6
l ,2·Dichlor0€thane 107-06-2 0.005
1, 1· Dichlor0€thane 75-34-3
cis· 1,2· 0Jchloroethylen& 156-59-2 0.07
ti ans· 1,2 · DJ ch lo r0€t hyl ene 156-60·5 0.1
,.ofC:iifo'romei~aiie~
r1 ,3.Qichloropropanc 142·28
~2,2· Dichloropropane 594-20·
! , 2· Die hloropropane 78-87-5
p..i :.~~~~.lor?pr~pene ,, 663·58·6
1,3· Oichlo1op1opylene 542· 75·6
DinoSEb 88-85- 7
Diquat bromide 85-00·7
Endothall 145· 73.3
Endrin 72-20-8 0.000 2
~·-4.1 . JJJJ...,_
1
Epichlorohydrin
.,JJtJJJ•
·rn&.sifa·
·Ethylt>enzene 100·41-4 II
Groundwater Sail
'
'I
Metribuzin 21087·64·9 ·.
Naphthalene 91·20-3
'.Nitrate (as N) 14797·55·8 10.0
Nrtrite (as NI 14797-65·0 I.
I
-~~1~~~~!~7~. ..?.~. ~~:.~..
p-Chlorotoluene 106-43·4
Parathion 56-38·2
Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 0.001
Phenol 108-95-2
Phorate 298-02-2
Picioram 'i"9'iifo'2'.'i"
Polychlormated bi°pllenyls 1336·36·3 II
0
Toxaphene 8001-35-2
1, 2 .4· Tr1chlorobenzene 120-82·1
l, 1,1-Trichloroelhane 71-55-6 0.200
1, 1,2· Trichloroethane 79-00-5
Trich Ioroet hylen e 79-01·6 0.005
"2('2';4'.5'.'friC'ilio:ophenoxyl
lpropionic acid
:1,2,3· Trichloropropane
'
.Trifluralin
I ,,
1582·09-8
,!ri~-~.l.~.~e.t.~a.n~s _(!otalL_. ~--"'" ..... 9.~:9.~: .l
V1 nyl chloride 75-01 -4 0.002
Vinylidene chloride 75-35-4 0.007
Xylenes (mixed Isomers) 1330-20-7 10.0
TENNESSEE
STATUS
D Regulation fZl Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed fZl Prnposed 10/21191
0 In Development O Soil
D Expected Availability 0 Groundwater
fZl Both Soil & Groundwater
ONonc 0 Other
COMMENTS
1. The draft criteria nre the work product of n committee 3. If background levels exceed cleanup criteria, then cleanup
consisting of representatives of the Division.<; of Superfund, to background levels permitted.
Water Pollution Control. Water Supply, Solid Waste Man- 4. Site-specific :-;tandards can be requested.
agement, nnd Underground Storage Tanks. They were pro-
posed with the goal of establishing unifom1 soil and water S. For petroleum releases from USTs, the soil cleanup level
cleanup standnrds. ranges from 10-100 ppmw BTX for drinking water aquifers,
or 50-500 ppm w BTX for nondrinking wn tcr aquifers; and for
2. Guidance levels are not meant to be action levels which 100-500ppmw1'PH for d1·inking water aquifers, or 250-1000
would automatically require cleanup at a site with higher ppmw TPH for nondrink.ing water aquifers.
values.
REFERENCE
( I ) l.t'Ut'r 1l.1t1·rl 2 I o,·t. 1991 Irum Dr. Ralph Sinclair uf the Tcnncs~cc R 11 h·~ nl the Depa n mcni ol Hca Ith a nrl t: r1vi1r>r1111cnt. Division ol
( 2)
Dcp.1rt111cnt nl E11vi1011mt.'.nt and Cum.-rvati1111 tu Mr. Caner Will, Undc1g1r111rul Storni:c Tanks, Cha1ucr l 200· I · I 5, Unrlcrgrunnd Smragt·
Prcsidcnl of Tennessee As~ocia1ion of Bnsinc-;~. Dral1 Snil and Wa1.-r Tank Prn~r<im. Augn't 199 I (r.-visccl).
Ckan1rp S1amlanb.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
Required Detection Level
Tennessee Cont'd.
Groundwater Soil
0.1
fDich Iorome l ha ne 75-09-2
~"'· 1,
·- Z·...............
Dichloropropane
···-·· ~··'' ..~ .. '
78-87-5 ,..............
0.005 ,, •• ,,,1111111111;1t//,,,,;JJlllJl//IJIM111/JN1////;,,
''·· ········"~''''j
~,
'
/ 'v1ercury 7439-97·6 0.002
VI ethoxych lor 72-43-5 0.04
i Nrtrate {as Nl 14797-55·8 10
'\.t:'!.l.t~.i.!7. -~~-~- -~ ~.
'
14797·65·0
.0.001
!. "'"""'
Pen tac hIo rop he nol
······················'
87-86-5
.11 • •Jiii'
Soil Soi-I
7440--38·2. (I
''•'
enzene 71·43·2 II
\coomium 7440·43-9
rCarbon tetrac lllorid e 56·23·5
r~.~!ord~~~.wu u ,,, _, 5!.:Z~.~~--
Chromium 7440-47-3
Dic hIorom ethane 75.09.2 II
Ethyl benzene 100-41·4
Lead 7439-92· l
Lindane 58-89·9
I ~Xe~~ry" 7439.'~;/j'.'6'" '11
I
~Pentachlorophenol 87--86-5
fPolych Iori nated bl p~e ny Is 1336-36-3
JPolyn ucl ear Aromatic ,.
H.Y~~?~~~-~-~~!. 00-0Q;G . lf~i."':
p,p'-Dichlorodiphenyl
tr ich lo roe lha ne 50-29-3 5
Te trac hloroethy le ne 127-1 8-4 0.5 0.5
Toluene l08.S8-3 40 10
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons fTPH) 00-00·4 250 100
r C'i::friChTffiocthane
I ,
)Trichloroethyle
};i !!)'I ch Ior(de
1
Xylenes (mixed Isomers)
~
188 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND CROUNDWATF.R
TEXAS
STATUS
D In Development 0 Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
181 Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone O Other
COMMENTS
1. Cleanup must meet one or more of the following risk re- 3. For residential and nonresidential exposure, if groundwa-
duction standards: ter has a naturally occurring Total Dissolved Solids concen-
(a) background levels, tration greater than 10,000 mg/L, the cleanup level for a con-
taminant dissolved in this groundwater may be adjusted by
(b) health-based standards, multiplying by 100.
(c) such levels lhat any substantial present 01· future 4. Health risk assessment for known or suspect carcinogens
threat to human health or the environment is elimi· is based upon an excess upperbound lifetime risk of between
natetl or reduced to the maximum exlent practicable. one-in-10,000 and one-in-one-million, with one-in·one-mil-
2. Numerical criteria arc health-based standards (mcdia- 1ion as a goa I. Cumulative excess risk to exposed populations
specific concentrations). must not be greater than one in 10,000.
REFERENCE
1ndus1rial So!id Wa,lc and Municipal llazardon~ Waste in General. 31
TAC 335. 551 · 335.569 (S11bschap11:r S: Risk lkduction S1,111dan.h),
frxas Re,qim7, 15 June I<)<) 3.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Soi-I
(Residentiol - protective of (lndustriol • protective of
groundwater) groundwoter)
Soil Soil
~/\ld1ca1 b s.uiton~ ..
lAldicarb sulfo~lde
.
~!d1in
1
A)umtnum phosph'1de
.
1111
~Aniline
' " ' " ""'"' ,,//11
62-53-3
It ,,, ,1 , 1JITl
• • ;-,11 /l,n,,. ,., , .JHllllllJwullllllhn ##llll•U 111111,u•ll
I' ·'
o.~,,
0,000 12'1
"''
0.4
Bi phenyl I ~ 511.0 ''!//,
1
'si'i (2..etl1• 50 I
j •• ,. .... . , , , , . , •• · h l.U.11..-hln,,,,..11111u/JJ.u1J}}}IJ 'lu11,,.JJJ1. I-l1 .. }}l111•• u111/11.·,.1
B1s(2-<:hlo1oethyl) ethe1 111-44-4 0.007 74
Bis(2-<:hlo1oisop1opyllethe1 39638-32-9 1.22
B1omofo1m
B1omomethane
Cadmium
fll i/ li /1U •II .,
,Ca1bo!ur11n
I
Cai bon disulfide
';ca1 bon tet1achlo1.ide
'.Chlo1dane
I,
17;1.1
(,
...
1'.:hlorobenzene
'················ ···· '· "' ).0~:~9: . ··'' fl ,, ,'-:_~,, I. • ,,,,~,,,, m1t11mt111ffllll.mm1111n1111ff/111mm1111/J
Chlorobenzilate 510-15·6 73.0 204.0
Chlo1octhanc 75-00-3 73.0 204.0
Chlo1ofo1m 67·66-3 1.0 1.0
2· Ch!o1 onaphthalene 91-58-7 292.0 818.0
2· Chlo1ophenol 95-57-8 18.3 51.1
111
"''~''-'-' A.4(}.47', 3
1
111111
i'cl':
1
.Ch1omium ]
Dimethoate Q i!
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2. 4-0 in itrophenol "
Dinoseb
; 1,4-D ioxa ne ' .. ,
Diphenylamlne 91.3 256
1,2· Diphenylhyd1azme 122·66· 7 0.0106 0.035 8
D1sulloton 298--04-4 0.146 0.409
Endosulfan 115-29-7 0.183 0.511
Endothall 145· 73.3 10 10
End1in
2· Elhoxyethanol II
2· Ethoxyethanol acetate II I 1(11
Eth ylbenie ne 100....111
Ethylene glyco ~
Ethylene oxide 75·21·8 0.008 35 0.028
flu om nt he ne 206·44-0 146 409
Fluotene 86-73-7 146 409
Fluotide 16964·48-8 400 400
Fo1maldehyde 50-00-0 730 2040
,Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide ;!
Hei1ach loro· l .3 · butad ie ne
Hexachlo1 obeniene
ll~~hl~~yc_l~ex'.l~e
Hexachloroethane 67-72-1 6.08 20.4
lsobutyl alcohol 78·83· l l 100 3070
lead 7439.92.1 1.5 1.5
lindane 55.59.9 0.02 0.02
m-C1esol 108·394 183.0 511.0
'ffi.mnih obenzene
Mercury 11 'i! ti 2
~Methomyl I .
,Methoxychlo1 IL
·2. Methoxyethanol
Methoxyethanol acetate 110-49-6 7.3 20.4
Methyl ethyl ketone 75.93.3 183 511
Meth yI isobuty I ketone 108· 10· l 183 511
Methyl me th acry late 80-62-6 292 818
n-Dioctyl phthalate 117-84·0 73 204
'N Nitloso-n-meihyliiitiYIITTiiine 10595~95~6 0.000'387 o:ooC3
!N·Nitrosodi· n-p1 opylamine 621·&4·7 0.001 22 0.004 09
rNNit1 osodiethylamine 55-18-5 0.000 056 8 0.000 191
'N-Nit1 osodimethylamine 62-75-9 0.000 167 0.000 561
:N-!} itrosopY'!_o~ dine 930·55·2 0.004 06 0.013 6
Naphthalene 91-20·3 146 409
Nickel 7440-02·0 10 10
Nitrate (as Nl 14797-55-8 I 000 l 000
Nit1ite (as Nl 14797-65·0 100 100
N1trobe nzen e 98-95-3 1.83 5.11
'O'.Ciesol If-
ip--Chl()r()<lnillne
rp--e1esol ~I
.Pe ntach I01 oph eno I
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 191
Soll Soil
I
'Phenol 108-95-2 2 190
fPhlhalic anhydrid- 85-4 4-9 7 300
rPo lych Iorimrted bi phe nyts 1336-36-3 0.05 II
"n•~nm• <~h~~J1uu ~J
tp,p' · Oichloro
diphenyl,..,,dichlo1oethane
iii..,, _ , .... , ,,,
,_,,/,/" ,,,.,...,.Hf
1~ •.
72-54-8
~-- ....... ..._
0-035 5 'ltlUIJldJJI...,..,.
0. 119
flilltilil" ,, I q - - •
p,p'- Dichloro
d 1phenyldichloroethylene 72-55-9 0.025 0.084 I
p,p'- D1ch lorod iphenyl
trichloroethane
Pron amide
r.--
/Pyrene
Pyridine
buintozene
'
·Selenlum
I_
~-1·~~.er
Strychnine & sails
Styrene ID
1,2A, 5-Tetrn<:hl'Jfobeniene
1, 1, 1,2-Tel rachloroethane
1, 1,2,2-Tel rachloroethane
feii'a'Chi0ioeHl;a1:-ne
p,3 ,4, 6-Tetrac hlorophenol
IT etraethyld ith i opyrophosphate
iToluene
I
I ,
[_?~~~,e-~~-.-d"u.JMJl~N ~ ..,
1,2 ,4-Trichlorobenzene
l, l, 1-Trichloroelhane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tr1c hloroethy Iene
Trich lorofl uorom ethane
2-:4~6".'friciiioroph eiloi'
2, 4, 5-Trich loroph enol
~(2 ,4 ,5-Trichforopheno.<r)
Jp1op'1onic acid
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic
~ add
l _ ,rnJHNN/dll.H /1'1/fN1n,
1, 1,2-Trich loropropane
1,2,3-Trich loropropane
1,3,5-Trinilrobenlene J
Vinyl acelate 1(1 ~
'-lmyl c\1\mirle
Ni'ii;;1·1il'e~e"Cli10'11ae"'
~ylenl!'S (mixeo isomers) 1330-20-7 l 000 l 000
Soil Soil
Sail Sail
[~!~;~~~l~.om~~-ne
1,2· Di bromoethane
Dibutyl phthalate
1,4· Dichlo1 obenzene
1,3· Diehloroaenzene ~ r.ii:v:i
I ,2. Die hi oi oben zen e • I LI
!oi ctihiio6lomorniit hiiiie· [I 'PL
Soil Soil
(Re sidentiol - protective of (I ndustrial - protective of
humon he<:1lth considering human health cons"1dering
inhalation & ingestion pathways_ ) __ inhololion & ingestion pathwa y s)
- ----
Constituen t GAS Number ppmw Remark s ppmw Remarks
1, 1, 1. Dichloroethane
~ cis· l, 2-0ichlo•oethylene
i trans· 1,2· Dlcnloroethylene
Die hlorornet hane
/ 2,4:_Dich10!".?P~.~ ~.ol. ,""'
1,2-Dichl(l{op1opane
Dieldrin
Die th~ t phthalate
Dimethoate
2 .4· Dim ethyl ph eno<
(." """" ....... •• .... .. Ifill
f2, 4-0i nitroph enol
' Dinoseb
1,4· Dioxane
1Diphenylamine 1:-
1.2 ·h~_i.P_~e~Y.! ~Y.?. ~ az i ne
Disulfoton LL
Endosulfan
Endothall
Endrin
2· Ethoxyelhanol
"2:Eiii ox;;e"itiaiioTac:"e t"a i~
1EI hyl benzene
( Ethylene glyco I
Et11ylene oxide
i, .fl.1!.~.~ -~ .t.~.~"-~ ..
Fluorene
Fluoride
f 01 maldehydc
Heptachlo1
Heplachlo1 epoxide a
;w,;~.;cii"loio: ·1 :3:.truiaii ;,;rie
fHex ~ch Iorobe nzcn e
f' ll Hexach Iorocyc1oh exa ne
~ Hexac hI01 oet ttane
'~.?,;'~Y.1 a lea h~! . I I 1~111 111
Lead
Lindane
m-Cresol
m-Dinit1oben,ene
Mercury
11~
194 CLEANUP CRITERFA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Texas Cant'd,
Soil
(Residentiol • protective of (lndustriol • protedive of
humon heolth considering humon heolth considering
inholotion & ingestion pcithwoys) inholotion & ingestion pothwoysl
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Remorks ppmw Remorks
l'.2:4:S:reir~h1orobentene
''' ',., •.t•······ ...JTU•
95.94.3
~ .........82.3
~····•'' ''/. 1Jllllll.
613
l,1, l ,2·"1e\1ach1oroclnane 630-20-6 45,9 62.9
l , l ,2 ,2· Tetrachl oroet ha ne 79.34.5 8.0 11.7
Tet rac hloroethy le ne 127· 18·4 79,3 207
2, 3, 4, 6· Tetrac hlorophe nol 58-90·2 8 230 61 300
rre\raeiiiyii!ilfllopyr0phospiiaie 3589:24:5 '137
i Toluene 108·88-3 3 580
Toxaphene 8001-35·2 0,582
I , 2 ,4-Trl ch lorobe nzene 120-8 2· l 678
~:}:.~:T~!-~!!.!~!.~.~~~!!~..,,,,,, ,,, ,, 71 -55-6
'h •••••••••• ,,,_....:...:r:;
9630
-·-· ·.Jli•'"
l, 1,2· Trichloroethane 79-00.5 12.7 16.2
Tric hi 01oet hyle ne 79--01·6 2A 2.85
Trichl orolIuoromethaoe 75.59.4 8.73 8.36
2 ,4, 6-Trich!010ph encl 88--06-2 58,2 520
2,4, 5· Trichlorophenol 95.95.4 8 080 10400
f2<2:4;S:rriC:iiioroil'lienoZYi
propion i c acid 93.7.
2, 4,S.Trichloropherioxy~cet ic
acid 93-7 6·
I I
..!_.!:2-Tfichl~~~OP_'.!,'.!;...,.,,,,,.., 1 (/Jn..~-~-~:~_?; .. I
Groundwater
Residential
Constituent CAS Number mg/l Remarks
f
~Benzene'' ''if'43~i ·o'.oos·
·Benzidine 92·87·5 0.000 000 37
): .
,Beryllium 7440-41· 7 0.004
~8{phenyl
~Bis (2·- ethylhexyl)
~.... . . ......................
~
adipate ,
Bis(2-<:hlo1oethyO e1he1
___ 92·52-4
,.., 103·23·1
l 11·44-4
1.83
?.:
//i,, .. ~ '"""' '"'
0.000 077 4 ~·-
B1s(2-chlo1oisop1opy1Jethe1 39638·32·9 0.012 2
Bromoform 75·25·2 0.1
Bromomethane 74-S3·9 0.051 l
Cadmium 7440.43.9 0.005
,, •• _...., .... ' f
,cartiof u1 an T563i'6~2·· ·a:t14·
,Ca1bon disulfide 75· ls.-O 3.65
' .
rarbon ieuachloride 5623·5 0.005
______
~Chlordane
,Ch!crobenzene..,.
57· 74--9
100.90.z....
0.002
..~L.
Chlorobenzilate 510· 15·6 0.73
Ch I 01 oetha ne 75.00-3 0.73
Chlo1ofo1m 67·66·3 0.l
2·Chlo1onaphthalene 91·58·7 2.92
2-Chlorophenol 95.57.s 0.183
:d11omium
I
~
Chromium (Vf)
Cyanide ".
y2 4·0 I
~;. n-octylphthala!e
,,,,,,,,, .......... - - . , ..
Di(2· ethylhexyl) phthalale 117·81·7 0.006 08
1,2· Di b1omcr3-<:hlo1op1opane 96· 12·8 0.000 2
Oib1omochlo1 om ethane 124·48·1 0.1
1,2· D1b1 omoethane 106·93·4 0.000 05
Dibutyl phlhalate 84·74·2 3.65
i~ii.'ol'C'1il0i0iieiiierie" 1 10s::r5.f 0:·075~
Groundwoter
Residentiol
W1
11' ' ' 1Ut
i0'5'.'ffj:'9''''
!2, 4· Dinilrophenol 51-28-5
Din05eb 88-85·7
1. 4- Dioxane 123· 91-l
IDiphenylamine
/., ... , ............ ..... , .. ,,J,JJ.Unn
1:?2·39·4
/J,,,,,,,,,,,,.,
1,2· Diphenylhydrazine 122.55.7
Disulfolon 298-04·4
Endosulfan I 15·29-7
Endothall 145.73.3
Endiin 72·20·8
r.::tfi'liiiicY'etii'ariOi"" "" " .,, •· ' • 110:'.8a:s"'"
i2. Etho•yethanol acetate 111-15--9
l Ethylben~ene
Ethylene glycol
1, ~:.~Y!~~~-~~ ~.~-"~'"'''"'J-.uu..,,,
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
1
100-41-4
107-21-1
75-21·8
"''····••'4·······
206-44- 0
86-73-7
Fluoride
Fo1 maldehyde
16964-48-8
50-00-0
•
Heplachlor 76-44·8
fttelliir'Cii107iii>Qxide '• ·1 o2ii:'51'.:.3'"
1 Hexac hloro-1,3· bul ad! ene 87-683
Hexac h loroben1ene 118-74-1
:J.-H exach lorocycl ohexane 31 9-85-7
1He~achloroe!~. an~....... 67·72-1
J**n' '"'-•··'"•·•· •·•·
lsobutyl alcohol 78-83-1
Lead 7439-92-1
lindane 58-89·9
m-C1esal 108-39·4
m-Dinitrabenzene 99·65-0
~ ~A-eiCU~ 7439~97.5 ''
f Methomyl 16752-77-5
fMel hoxychlor 72-43·5
f '.· Methoxyel hanol 109-86-4 O.lll6
~~-~~~~~~':!.~~!..~~~(! ~
II b/11//1 1 1' I //),
J /lllll/i
110-49·6
·······"''"''' ''':.J./'"J ...~:.~.?.~.m rl/111/JJJJJ/f/lflflflfJ//JJJJflflflflflflflf//JJJJJ11//JJIJ,!!!!.. 111111/ll////ll///J11111/ll/l/l,..,11111//ll/l//l1111/1J/l/mmlllll/l/JJ/l/.,1/lll/l/.,/fl/l/1!t
Methyl el hyl ketone 78-93-3 1.83
Methyl isobulyl ~elone 108-10-l 1.83
Mel hyl merhacrylate 80-62·6 2.92
n-Oioctyl phi ha la le 117-84-0 0.73
N Nitioso-n-methylethylam1 ne 10595.95.5 0.000 003 87
f'N-N'i i'r.lSOd 1: n:pioiYYiam1ne '62'f.'6if.'i cfoocfo12.. 2··1 ""''"'"""~
N-N i1uisod iethyla mine 55-18·5 0.000 000 568
62-75-9 0.000001 o7
~
111-Nitrosodirnethylarnlne l
~ N· Ni Irosopy1ro1 idine 930-55·2 0.0000406
t.
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELJNF.S 197
G roundwote r
Resldential
,,~ai'.ifil1oze1
;Selen!um
'
'ifa.:'.68~''''
7782·49·2
'i:i'.'d63"2i3'""
0.05
;sliver 7440·22-4
fstrychnine & salts '57-24·9
~
~~.'.~! .~P,~..,,,,,,,,,,,,m.,, II~· lflr, l/lilth ,,,,, I ~P;;~~;,~
1,2.4. 5· Tetiachlo1obenzene 95-94-3
I, 1, 1,2· Tetrachloroethane
I, 1,2,2-Teti achtaroethane
Tetrn~ hlarcethy\ene
2.3 .4 ,6· Tetiachlmophenal
:reli"a'eui\.'ftiifli'lfiiiii1'cip'fios'pti'<i'it - M
I .
v aluene
fToxaphene
·, , 2 .4· T rich Im ob eniene
f1,1, l-T1ichlo1o-ethane
'··11•-• •-•··-•••·•• · ·-··•""·· •••· 1liff.n1111.
1, 1.2-Ti ich laroethan e
T11chlmac\hylene
Trjch lmaflum amethane
2 .4 ,6· T1 ichlm aphenol
2,4,5-Trichloraphenol
~2(2' I
t p1opion1c
,2,4 ,5· T1 khlmopheno
' acid .
_, l ,2·11 ichlmop1opane
~ ~• l•l•••• l•• .... ••• .. ll•l/ . . . 1.1 . . .
1,2.3· T richlmaprapane
1,3.5· T11rnt1obenzene
Vinyl ace late
Vinyl chlm ide
V1nyhdene chlo1 ide
i'Xyl'e 'ii'eS' (rnrx~~ rsom
~
198 CLEANUP CR!TERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
UTAH
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development DSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
~None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Utah complies with U.S. EPA regulations.
2. Utah groundwater and soil cleanup levels one determined
on a site specific basis, with the Action Level used as a start+
ing point. Action Levels for contaminated groundwater are
0.5 mg/L for TPH, 0.005 mg/L for benzene, 1 mg/L for tolu+
ene, 0. 7 mg/L ethylbenzene, 10 mg/L for xylene, 0.02 mg/L
for naphthalene, and 10 mg/L for oil and grease. Action Lev+
els for contaminated soil are 30-100 ppmw for TPH, 0.2
ppmw for benzene, 100 ppmw for toluene, 70 ppmw for
ethylbenzene, 1000 ppmw for xylenes, 100 ppmw for Total
Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons, and 300 ppmw for oil
and grease.
REFERENCE
VERMONT
STATUS
121 Regulation D Guideline
121 Exists 09/29/88 D E xists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development OSoil
D E xpected Availability 121 Groundwater
D Both Soil & Groundwater
0 None D Other
COMMENTS
1. If an enforcement standard is exceeded, the Agency must (b) prevent exceedance of the Preventive Action Limit, or
be notified. The Agency will evaluate the information and, (c) ensure that the Enforcement Standard is not exceeded.
depending on cause and significance, may require a response
to achieve compliance with the Enforcement Standard. 3. For carcinogens, the Agency nses a one in a million risk as
acceptable for a risk assessment.
2. If a Preventive Action Limit is exceeded, the Agency must
be notified. The Agency will evaluate the information and, 4. Soil cleanup standards are established on a case-by-case
depending on cause and significance, may require a rcsporn;c basis for each specific site.
to
(a) minimize the contaminan t concentration where techni-
cally and economically feasible,
REFERENCE
S!Jl" nl Vnmolll, Agcncy of NJLurJl Rcsourccs, lkp<11 L11wn1 o[ Envi·
ron men LJI Cmiwrva 1ion. Chap1 er 12. Ground \VJ Lcr P1 <llCCL ion Ru k
and SirJ!egy. R11k No. 88· 37. 29 Scpt. 1988.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwoter Groundwater
Groundwoter Groundwoter
- -----
ES (Enforcement Standard) _ _PAL {Preventive. Action li mit)
--'-----
Constituent CAS Number mg/ L Remorks mg/L Remarks
,0.03.
0.75
....... O.o25
( Atraz"me 1912·24·9 0.( 0.0003
/ .8.a~!.~.~- ,, , , . ,. ,, ,........ . 7440-39-3 l.O 0,5'
Bentazon 25057.S9-D 0.017$
. ·······''
0.008 75
Benzene 71-43-2 0.005 0.000 5
Bromacil 314·40·9 0.08 0.008
8uty1ate 2008-41·5 0 .05 0.005
Cadmium 7440-43·9 0.005 0.002 5
f c~ ,ba'fYi ·~,
1
J
tllJ I f IJ//JJ/j/
"6"3.'25:'2""' "'of"',,, JIJJJn
'!!""" 'II " (I ."3 5 If/ 'I/If"
. Carbofura n 1563- 66-2 0.03'6 O.Ql8
Carbon tetrachloride 56·23·5 0.005 0.000·5
Ca1boxin 5234·68·4 0.7 0.35
f_ Ch!oraT!l~~.. .,.,, 1,.. ,, .133-90-4
........ ,.,__ ........ ..........
0.105 ,,,, 0.052 5
/h10// ••~•"""•••••
Oipll~namid
Disulfoton
Oiuron
En. ~~.t~.a 11.•.. .•.•. ... • ~· ····· · · · · · - ··-~··············· ····· .....................................................
Endrin 72·20·8 0.000 32 0.000 16
Epichlorohydrin 106·89·8 0.000 28 0.000 028
Ethyl benzene 100 41.4 0.68 0 .34
Ethy le ne glyco I 107·21· 1 7.0 3.5
Ethylene thiourea 96·45·7 0.000 25 0.000 025
, Fe na m1phOS' 'II
'22224'.92.'.6''11 "o:ooria '"'" ,,. Ulllll
'" 0'.000"9' <'/I
Fluometu1on 2164· 17·2 0.09 0.045
Fonofos 944-22-9 0.014 0.007
fGlyphosate 1071.S3-6 0.7 0.35
1
r
Heptachlor 76-44·8 0.000 076 o.ooo'oo7 6
STATE CLEANUP STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 201
Groundwater Groundwo,er
' 2· Methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic
in r II ~
I Metola<.:hlor - lti I
t~.~~d.b~~- . I
I
I
Pronamide 23950-58- 5 0.052 0.005 2
Propachlor 1918-16· 7 0.092 0.046
Propazine 139-40·2 0.014 0.007
Propham 122·42·9 0.120 0.060
Pro~oxur 114·26· l 0.003 0.0003
rs::i~e'r', W" """"111111111111"""""' 7440:;a.:a·"111m" 111 ·0 :050
,,
VIRGINIA
STATUS
D Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
COMMENTS •
Virginia soil and groundwater standards are site specific and
established by risk nsscssment.
REFERENCE
WASHINGTON
STATUS
!ZI Regulation D Guideline
[ZJ Exists 02/00/91 D Exists
D Proposed D P roposed
D In Development OSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
!ZI Both Soil & Groundwater
O None D Other
COMMENTS
1. The regulation provides t hree options for establishing site- (c) similar to (b) except lifetime cancer risk set at l in
specific cleanup levels: 100,000 for both individual substances and for the to-
(a) clean up 1evels are id en ti ficd for 25 of the most corn mon tal risk caused by all substances on a site (applicable
hazardous substances found at sites (applicable to when cleanup levels under (a) or (b) are technically im-
"relatively straightforward" cleanups involving only a possible to achieve, lower than background levels, or
few hazardous substances); may cause more environmental harm than good; may
be applied to industrial sites).
(b) site-specific risk assessment using one-in-a-mi 1lion risk
level for individual carcinogens, with aggregate not to 2. Groundwater cleanup levels based on highest beneficial
exceed 1 in 100,000 (applicable for sites with contami- use, that is, drinking water.
nants not listed in (a); and 3. Soil cleanup levels based on the most protective cleanup
levels for the site. More protective cleanup levels are re-
quired for residential sites compared to industrial sit.es.
REFERENCE
Washington S1,11c. Ocpa11mc1n ol Ecology. Tht: Modl'l Toxics Control
Ac1 Clean up Rt>gula 1ion, Cha1ncr I 73-34 0 WAC, amc udl•d Fchrna rr
1991,
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil Sciii
- - -- - -- -
(l ndustric:d Area) (Residential Areci)
- -----'"- -
Constituent CAS Number ppmw Re m a rks ppmw Remarks
Sail Sail
I. •
lin<;l.w e
Mercury
f PolychlNi nated biphenyls
j Polynuclear Aromatic.
l.~~X~~~~r~-~ -~-~~~-~'''""'""''""'"
p.p·· D1chlorod1pheny l
tr ic hloroet ha ne 50-29-3 5.0 1.0
Tetrac hi on1etlly le ne 127-1 8·4 0.5 0.5
Toluene 108·88·3 40.0 40.0
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TPH) 00-00-4 1001200 gasoline/other gasoline/other
' "i",'i': 1~'friel1iilioe"\ila~e '11/J/f/lllF"lfl• INfff'j" f 5'5'.'i;''IH/////z///IUJ' 2o".'(f'llJ!// 111H111'!/l/l/l!Jj/j/lll/PlllHf!Jfl'lfll'l///f//HIHl!/IJIJlll
Trich Ioroethylene {/, 79-0 l· 6
1
' 0.5 ~ "'' 1111
I
"
Groundwater
Constituent
~rsenic
1
~Benzene
Icadmium
Chromlu
~.~-'.~·Di brom oeth an e
1,2· Dichloroethane
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
Lead
Lmdane
J Merc~ ~? ~J
1
fu
~ Polychlorinaled blp~-~nyls
f Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAH)
Total Petro re um
WEST VIRGINIA
STATUS
D Regulation [g] Guideline
D Exists [g] Exi sts 00/00/89
D Proposed D Proposed
COMMENTS
L For groundwater, West Virginia follows the U,S, EPA's 3, Soil clcan11p levels arc site-specific,
drinking water maximum contaminant levels U.ICLs).
2, Used motor oil is not included in this policy,
REFERENCE
Mt·1mir,11Hlum 10 Undngru11nd Storage Tank Ow11t"r~ .~nd Solid \Va,lc
Facility Owner/OptrJtm lrom Wcsl Virginia Division ol Environmental
Prolt'cliun, Office of Wasw Managemt'nL Pt'trukum Con1a111brn1nl Soil
J'nlicy, 1959,
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Soil
Constituent CAS Number mg/l Remorks ppmw Remarks
»
fBen~ene. 71-43--2 0,005
!
BTEX (tota!) 00-00-5
Ethylbeniene 101}-41-4
Toluene 108-88-3
'olal Organic Volatiles
'I . (T_OVl., .,.
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TPHl 00·00-4 50/100 Action level
gasoline/diesel
Xylenes (m;,ed isomers) 1330-20· 7 10
206 CLEANUP CRITF.RIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
WISCONSIN
STATUS
[ZJ Regulation D Guideline
[ZJ Exists 01101192 D Exists
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development 0 Soil
D Expected Availability !ZI Groundwater
0 Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone 0 Other
COMMENTS
1. Preventive Action Limits {PALs} se1·ve to inform the De· 7. If a con tnm i nan t is not on the Ii st, the i:;oi 1 residual con-
partm en t of potc n ti al groundwate1· contaru i nation problems, tam i nation level (H.CLJ, and soil residual contamination
establish the level at which the Department is required to level gonl (RCLGJ protective of the b'l"OJmdwater exposu1·e
commence efforts to control the contamination, and provide pathway may be determined using a soil-water pa1·titioning
a basis for design and management practice criteria. The model or a si te-s peci fie u n;:;atma led zone fa le and transport
limit is not intended always to 1·equfre remedial action. model.
These limits are designed to minimize groundwater contami- 8. Soil Quality Criteria are ba;:;ed on prntection of human
nation to the extent technically and economically feasible. health from direct contact of ;:;ubstanccs and applies as
2. Exceeding an F.nfm·ccmcnt Standm·d CRSJ will nlways re- follow;:;:
qufre remedial action, ni;suming the Department finds the (a) Apply to soils that lie within 0.6 rn of the land surface.
impact to be significant. Suils below 0.6 m of the land surface arc to be remedi-
3. lfbackgrmmd concentrations exceed the PAL, the Depart- ated to the extent practicable and be protective of all
ment may grant an exemption from compliance. applicable pathways of concem.
4. Soil cleanup levels were proposed on Mm·ch 25, 1993. (b) If the background concentration of arsenic in the soil is
5. lf unsaturated carbonate bedrock or fractUJ"ed bedrock higher than the non-industrial RCL or the industrial
within 1 m of contaminated soil, or distance from contami- RCLG, the background concentration i;:; u;:;ed.
nated soil to high groundwater level is less than 1 m, or (cl lfthc substance is not listed, the RCLG fo1· non-indus-
maximnm thickness of contaminated soil is greater than 6 t1·ial sites i;:; the background concentration. The RCL,
m. or conduits (sewers, utility lines, and so forth) are within protective of human health from direct contact, can be
the zone of soil contamination and intersecting the high established by a risk assessru en t model n pp roved by
groundwater level, the Grnup I soil standards apply. the Department.
6. lf none of (5) apply, then whethe1· Gmup II 01· lil soil
standards apply depends on distance from contamination to
water, maximum thickness of con tami nation, ;m tura ted h y-
drauli c conductivity, and soi! organic carbon.
REFERENCE
I. S1a1e ul Wisconsin. Dcpanmcm ul Na1m<1I Resources. Chaplcr NR 3. Dr.:ilL o\ Proposed NR 700 Ruk St""rit""s, Cu11111rd1c11sivc Cleanup
140. Groundw.:iier Qnali1y, Rcgi~tcr. 679· 690(6), No. 433, Ja1111,1ry Ruic, 25 March I 99.~.
1992.
2. Prn11med Am(•11<l11w111~ to NR 140, \\fR. 48· 92.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Groundwater
ES (Enforcement Standard) PAL (Preventive Action Limit)
Constituent CAS Number mg/L Remarks mg/L Remci rks
'II/Will)"" ,-pp"
Acetone 67-64-l Proposed
Alachlo( 15972,60·8 Proposing 0,002 mg/L
Aldicarb 116·06·3
Arsenic 7440-38·2
~, Asbestos ,,, ~332,:?,,~,,, 7 million fibers per L
11~U01r Jl.iilr Ill rl/I•
Atrazrne 1912-24-9 0.000 3
Barium 7440.39.3 HI Propos'1ng 2.0 mgll 0.2 Propos'1 ng 0.4 mgll
Benzene 71.43.2 11 0.000 067 Proposing 0.0005 mg/L
Benzo [a I pyre ne 50-32·8 0.000 000 3
Bromoform 75-25·2 0.000 44
piu1~ ifoQ'8.'4f.'5 ......, nJ"JJJJoooJU
'·11::'"' .."llll/#ll/I prm
"''llM6'1"
Cadmium 7440,43.9 Proposfng 0,005 mgll 0,001
Carbary/ 63,25-2 0,192,
Carbofuran 1563:'66·2 Proposing 0,04 mgll
. '
0,010 ,,
Propos(iig 0,008 m&!L
~ ~
l , 3. Di ch lo robenze ne 541-73-1
1,2· D•chlorobenzene 95-50·1 Proi>osing 0.6 mgll ' Proposing 0.05 mg/L
Dichlorobromomethane 75·2?·4 L I , ~
.J?i.~. h_~?.r.?;!_i_l,1.~~.?.me~ ~,~,~~ 75·71· 8
UIYbJl.h/ •kdN11ll'!. rlt ••••• ,1,1,1/IJ
.'1
'IHIHJIHJ. ''"'"'I0,2
I/ Iuu1w111111lllnh1Proposed ·~
.u~, 1,, ,w.J..J:~, 1,,1J#l1111llJDU/111uiml/J.
uu1
1,2· Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.005 0.000 05 Proposing 0,0005 mg'L
I, 1· Dichloroethane 75.34.3 0.850 0.085
cis· 1,2· Di ch loroethylene 156·59·2 0.100 Proposing 0.07 mgll 0.010 Proposrng 0.007 mgll
trans· 1,2· 01chloroethylene 156·60·5 0.1 0.02
Oichloromethane 7 5. 09· 2 0.150 0.015
ia'.'a'Pf',.
~
'Tti(Ct\i(,,opropanc '·'tfo'Qi.\''11 "" •m111111r~
I
l
i'."i'iJOrYefe~ 169"6"4'.~8-S
rormaldeh .oo. Propo>ed
'"leptachlor 7&-44·8 'pr/i'p'*'"d '
.Heptach lor cpo~ide 1024.57 . II Propo'ieci:
2 08 Cl.EANUP CRJTERTA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Wis(onsin Cant'd,
Groundwater Groundwater
ES (fnfor(ement Stondord) PAL (Preventive Adion Limit)
Canstituent CAS Number
w 'lffl
I lead 7439-92- l
rufldane 58·89·9
I
, ercwy 7439·97·6
,Methoxych lor 72-43·5
} .
~~ ethyl ~!~¥.~ .~eto ~~ ,,, //; w,, 78·93·3
'i'-41 . .... 1 •• 1.11 .
Methyl 1sobu Iyl ke Ione 108· 10· I
Methyl /erl· butyl el he1 1634-04-4
MetOlilChlo1 51218-45·2
Metribuzm 21087-64·9
Naphthalene 91·20· 3
~'Nw;;;1; '(a's'
I
-r.rr111111'''"1'fll" ..... ,,. 1ra·i91: irs:'s'-'1
/pen tile hlorophenol 87-86-!'i·
?Phenol 108-95·2
!Po!ychlorinated biphenyls 1336-36·3
' /'
;Selenium . 7782-49·2
~ . . . . . . . 1.1 • ..... 1J1 u .. -.n1 ...... ...-
Silver " • fl
7440-22·4
Simazine 122.34.9
S!y1ene 100·42·5
2,3,7 ,8- Tel• achlo1odibenzo 1746-01·6
dio"n
{"""~· · •1J J• r 111•11•• u
{ e\1 achlo methyl.enc '""Ill"',,. llf'j":;o'ji':"ia'.',j'm
~Tetra hydrofu ran 09-99-9
,Tol uene
I
10a:aa-3 u
~Tota\ Nitrate/NI 00-00..2
'~P~,~~- ,....,~ ,,,11.&2~9-~:.~?i
l, I, I· T1 ich loi oethane 71· 55-6 0,200
1, 1,2· T• ichlo1 oethilne 79.00.5 II 0.000 06
Trichloroethylene 79-01·6 (I 0.000 18 P1oposing 0.0005 mg/L
Tnc hlorofl uorom et hilne 75-69·4 0.698
2(2 ,4 ,5· Ti ichlo1 ophenoxy)
p1opionic acid 93.72.1 0,010 P1oposing 0.05 mg/L 0.002 Proposing 0.005 mg/L
~Tr\11.Jfii1;i\'"lf • 'ltl#I/~
f· '
;~i~yl chloride
jVinylidene ~hlo ,,
7xylenes (mixed isome~)
Soil" Sail*
Sail** Soil"
Sail ** Sail*'
' Soil Quality Critetl• based on po ot..ction o! human health !1 om d ir•c I con111ct w iI h >ubsta nc~s.
1
• Soit Qualify Criteria ba'S.td on gfoundwat~r qu.1lity 'Sotanda1ds.
210 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
WYOMING
STATUS
[2] Regulation D Guideline
D Exists D Exists
!2l Proposed 05/00/93 D Proposed
D In Development D Soil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
!2l Bo t h Soil & Groundwater
D None D Other
COMMENTS
1. Certain chemicals may have only one significant exposure 3. Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration in soil
route from the soil; others may have both inhalation and oral must not exceed 30 ppmw (gasoline fraction) or 100 ppmw
ingestion exposure routes. (fue 1 oils/waste oi 1 fraction) if the ground wa tcr depth is less
2. The crinccr risk factor for soil cleanup action is onc-in-one-
than or eq ua 1to 50 ft ( 15 m), or 100 ppmw (gasol inc fraction)
million. or 100 ppmw (fuel oils/waste oil fraction) if the groundwater
depth is greater than 50 ft (15 m).
REFERENCE
S11il a111I Gmundwall'f Ch:~rrnp I.1·vl'ls in Wyomi11g, Dq1anmcm of
f.11viro1111ll'll1<1i Q11ality. W,11cr Qnality Divisi<r11, Pron·i!url'S for Estab·
Jishing Environm~ma! Rl' Sloration Standards for Leaking Undngro11111I
Storai,:e Tank Rt'l11c11iatirn1 Ac1iom. prepared by LcRny C. Fc11~1wr
(307-777-7781 ), May 1993.
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Soil
- - -- -Groundwoter
--
_ _ __ _ _Oro! Ingestion _ _ _ _ __
Constituent CAS Numb er ppmw Remorks mg/L Remarks
l I I,. 0.000 ·2
'frrr77!r
{ Acenaplllh ene If
r eel one
;,3:2/t
'1111 ',/
1 Ac~Loni\rile 0.2
rAcralein J1d.'61f1
!"'.1'''•··•"'"'·
Ac1Yl11mk!e
.11m.1~ - - - -
6-oboot.'
1
111111111111,, ,,:, '. "" •..11111111111111111111
Alachlor 15972-60-8 0.002
Ald<carb 116·06-3 0.003
Aldicarb sulfone 1646-88-4 0.003
A Id rear b su II oxide 1646·88-3 0.004
Aluminum (fume or dust) 7429·90·5 94
STATE CLEANUP ,\ TANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 211
Soil Groundwater
Orol lngestion
------
Constrtuent CAS NumbeT ppmw Remorks mg/L Remorks
Anthanthrene
Ar1lhrace11<i
Anlimony
Arsenic
191·26-4
120·12 7
7440-36-0
7440-38-Z
Q.000 2
0.000 2
0.006
0.05
l~
;
I
~!.1.~.~!.~~,, 912·24-9 0.003 ,jj,
'JJ.Jl.u •
·-'··· 1'.a'"
B~rium 7440-39-3
Benzene 71-43·2 ...· 0.005
Benzo(a)anthracene 56-55·3 0.000 2
Benzo!alpyrene 50-32·8 0.207 o.ooo 2
Benzolb)11uor anlhene 205-992 0.000 2
s'(/~ioie)pyrene ''f92:9f::>"" 1111""" '.o:ooo· ;'.( r/fl I 1111""'
Benzo(gh1 l pe ry!ene 0,000 2
Benio(jlflUllrMthene 0.0002'·
BeniQ(k\(\\ICf~l'I\~~ 0.000 2
Betyl\ium o,oo,;'
,_,.,1/lrdtl-4 #J '1~~ llll '''lul
Brs (2-ethylhexyll adipate 0.4
81s(2·chloroethyll ether 0.00007
Boron (wal('.r-soluble) 3.0
Br0moform 0.1
Cadmium 0.005
v·ciiitiiifuran •1111 ro:o4·lfl
carbon d•~trlfrde 3,2
Carbon letrachlorrde 0.00!i '
rl
Chlordane o.qo2 I
Wyoming Cont'd.
-----
Soil Groundwoter
Oral Ingestion
f2,
}1 . I ii).
II~
.:>-Xylene 95.47.'5
0xamyl (Vydate) 23135-22-0 02
1
?p.Cresal 10644-5 02
IP:9.i.l:'l.i.t~?~f1.~ene.. ,,u. l'Jo
100-.25·4
•I ' I , " " 11"i " l/(/,.,fllllll/,1/ultf////1J/J/l//r/r/11imltllll/I 11/J, ,9,;9.\,111#/I 111J/lllllll///////,,/'11111IJ/J11rl/rfMll1JJJflllllllllfff#i
Pen tac h Ioro phenol 87-86-5 0.001
Pnen~nthreM 85-01-8 0.000 2
Phenol 108-95-2 46 900 19
Phosphorus (yellow or wh•te) 7723-14-0 0.002
f'icloram 1918-02-1 0.5
("1.,.J J-rU~1•//1l101•111~n11•1111
Soil Groundwater
Orol Ingestion
1
Srlver t11,
rsrmairne
tyrene
ts·ulfate .
...•.~1?/!:.!~'.~~~~.1~~?.'.'!.~?.~~~.~.~'.~.
1,1,1.2· Tetrachloroethane
1.1.2.2· Tetrachloroel hane
Tet rac hIcroet hylene
Tetraethyl load
Thallrum
~fr~' II/1 '11/)/1//J r/pl//J'.llllJ)//Jl)JIJIJll.l.ll/1.
~fo/uene ,~
!Tota\ Nitrate/NII rite
1,Total Pwoleum i.
Soil
lnholotion
Soll
lnhgkitign
Z itrobetuene rHlli
. .......... ,, ..i....,, ..... , ,, ,1 111T~ .~.~}?},,. '1__?,,9
. ,'_o,,o_,-... ,,,,,,,,.,,.,.,,,,,,1111111l•llllul!111111111111111111111111ll11111111111111111111/11111m11mt111/ftfm1tll!llllllHlflmllll/fl//llllJJl/mlHllUllllllill
/.
1, 1, 1,2- Teliachloroethane 630-20-6 11 600
1, 1,2,2-Teliachloroethane 79-34-5 1480
Tet rach loroet hylene 127- 18-4 148 000
1,2 ,4-Tnchlorobenzene 120-82-1 80 400
I, 1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 5 380
oroe
Ifiii;'~ i i'n'Ylene' o 'II sa:200''1H ''!'/J!."11m11 1 11v11J!!p11111:""11111r;w¥,Jl/////Jl""'11'1111111111111111111z~j'l//l//,{f;"'l!///111f/Nll•w1111111111·•
1
~A; 6-Tr'•ch!i>ro'phenol
f , 'I I' 'I
600 I
'I I
I l/J
'Hi I ,, 'f 1.
Appendix A: Chemical Names, CAS Numbers, Synonyms
APPENDIX A:
CHEMICAL NAMES
217
Copyright © 1995 by ASTM International www.astm.org
218 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Task Sevin 4
Unifos (pesticide) Sew in
Unitox Union Carbide 7,744
Vapona Vioxan
Vapona Insecticide
Vaponite
Vinylofos CAS No.: 64-18-6
Vinylophos Name: Formic acid
Winylophos
289
290 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Constituent
j Acrylic ~cid
· Aeryloniti ile
Aery Iyl ch I01 ide
~ Adi pie acid
l,f1..i.~-~-i.! r~ !~,,,,,. y
Alla1oxins 1402·68·2
Aldica1b 116·06·3 P070 y 100 (a)
Ald1in 309-00·2 ?004 y I 500 (a) y
Allyl alcohol 107-18-6 POOS y 100 I 000
Allyl chlo1 ide 107·05· I I 000 y
f i':iii1amiiie' " "'Hi'iTi~§' '"
Aluminum {fume or dust) 7429·90·5
~ Alumi'num oxide 1344-28-1
~ Aluminum phosphide 20859-73-S
~ Al~.i:r:i.l.num su Ifate_.,,. 1111 , . . . . u ...... ,,n.fJ-.i&.o' tu,_1
00~3·01·3
••• ..... ...... ... ,
I-Amino· 2· methylanth1aqu inane 82·28·0
2-Aminoanthraqu in one 117.79.3 I
f Ammonium cMoride
~ Ammonium'ch1omate
2125·02·9
'788-96·9
5.000'
1 000
~ A~ ~on iu~..:~ ~ 1ate:. di bas!r 11, 3012.55:5
''""'""''''••••'/• ''''
5000
,,11"11/i.1nn.
Ammonium fluobo1ate 13826·83·0 5000
Ammonium ti uo1 ide 12125·01·8 100
Ammonium hyd10<1de 1336-21·6 I 000
Ammonium mt1ate (solution) 6484-52-2 y
Am mo ni um oxalate mo nohyd1 ate 5972·73·6 5000
~llN,. "1tlffl lN ~UiP~ll· 'HllJ W
Ammonium late monohyd1ate 60i:i9'."'"70:T'
!
Ammonium vanadate 7803-55-6 000
Ammonium zinc chloride (VAN! !4639·97·5
Ammonium' zinc chlo1 Ide {8Cl\(9CIJ 52628-25-S
Amphetamine 300-62-9
·'·
HAZARDOUS SUBSTAiVCES LIST (RCRA. CERCLA, SARA) 291
RCRA,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA,P/U Substances CERCLA EHS Toxic
Constituent CAS Number List Wastes (40 CFR Part 261 ) RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemical
'1
Asbeslos (d)
Auramtne.. . :tlP'''Jn"""' Jl'lfu ·~~111u1~·11111tu111p11u·j
1332-21-4
"'492:eo.e
•
I ,,II
Azaserine 115-02-6
I Az'mphw.~\hyl 2642-714 .
Az in ph os-m ethy I 86-50·0
O:·BHC ,_319.:~·.6_
fl-BHC 319-85-7
8-BHC 319-86-8
Barium 7440-39-3
Ba11um compounds, N.O.S. (b)
Bari um cyanide 542-62-1 ICI
-Benzo( alaiitli rac ene ' ,,., .,,. '''IJ'f.l"il""/J//U " 56:S5;3
' Benzo(clacrid(ne
't 225:51.4
Benzal chlorlde gs.ad ~ l
Benzamide 55-21-0
~~~ z~ ~a.rn, ~~~:..~:.T e:t.~Y.'.·...~Y~ ~oc 11 I~'.!.~e .. )lllllllNlllll" ,,,1 ..~3~?.~~~ F. •
Beniene, I ,2,4"tiri::hlou;i.
Benzene, 1,2-diehfori> u·
Benzene, 1,3.5· trlnitro-
Benzene, 1,4-di ch lor°' I I
~ !!.~.~~.~.~.~.'.): .'.<:.~i?.~?.'!!~.!~¥.~1 ~~;,~ \!:~.. ~ "· 111ul/JUu } ..~.?.· .'. .~. . ~.. "'"Iii/II
Benzene, 1· bro mo-4-ph enoxy · 101-55-3 i I
Benzene, I· methyl-4-n it10· (9CI) 99-99-0 I
Benzene. 2-methyl· 1,3·dinitro- 606-20-2 u1 ....
Benzene, dichloro·, N.O.S. (bl 25321·22· 6
Benzene, dimethyl (m-) 108-38-3
"'"- . '· •4,1-14~ .... !Joj_,;t
B_enzene, dlmethy I {o-)
. IN•/ 'I.IP.I ll'g5'.477fflfH• 'ff///ffjj{//l/HJl/1
Benzene, dimethyl (irl 106-42·3
Benzene. drnl\r()., N.O.S .. (bl· 25154-54·5
Benzene, pentachloro· 608-93".5
~~~~~ ~ e~.'.soni.c..~.C.IJ~. ,,,.,,1 9B-0s.s
rft'!Jl.JJ .... ....... ,, ,N,J/l. ,,,,,,s,
Benzenediami ne 25265·76-3
I 2-B enzen ed ic arboxy Iic acid,
bis(2-ethyl hexyl) ester 117-81-7
1,2· Benzenedica1boxylic acid, di-n-0etyl este1 1I 7.34.0
Ben7.enesulfonyl chloride 96·09-9
r a"eli1;'i.iiliii 'HJ l/"92: 87.'5..,.,
Benzi midazole. 4 ,5. dich!oro-2. {tri fl uoromethyl). 3615-2 1·2
Benzo(gh i) perylene 191-24·2
Sen zo( klf Iuora n\hene 207-06-9
i. ~.;;;~!~~P.Y.r!'2.:. .. ,. u .... . , ,
50.. na
lllJJ. J •••••••• "" "'
Benzol b]l luoranthene 205-99-2
Benzol 1Jfluo1anthene 205-82-3
Benzoic acid 65·85-0
Benzonitrile 100-4 7-0
p-B en zoq umo ne 106-51-4
f "aenzot ile iii0r'1<:fo"'11111111'111r • ·9B:b'n~1'
~ BenzQy I chloride 98-88-4
~ Be nzoyl per ox 1de 94-36..(l
~ Benzy I ch Ioride 100-44· 7 •
~ Ben~l.~yan)de_ ......,,.,,,, ' II "" }.:t.~: ~,~. . ~ - i
Beryl I ium (c) 7440·41· 7 I~ p
Beryl Iium ch lo ride 7787-47-5
Beryllium compounds N.O.S. (b) y
Beryllium fluoride 7787-49-7 5000
Beryllium n1tra1e (8E(N03)2) (VAN ) 13597·99-4 5000
"a'eiYfffum· iiifi'Jie' iiinY'draiit<VM·O"' ····-- 1r ·" '1 'ffs""l'55~5 '11 '
RCRA,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA,P/U Substonces CERCLA EHS Toxic
Constituent CAS Number List Wostes (40 CFR Part 261 : RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemical
B1omofo1m
B1ucine I•
l ,3-Buladiene )
2·Butene, ] ,4-.dichlor~ I I
..~.~-~!-~.~-ry~a_t_~
n-B utyl alcolol ULI
seo Bulyl alcohol
rerl- Butyl alcohol
Butyl benl)ll phthalate (
Butylamine (BCIJ
fl_.,.j_ ·~niffll! l"Jll'll l'"' t+-f"I
sec-Butylamine (8C1)
sec-Buytlamjne, (Sl· (8Cll
Buty1aldehyde
._C~I. A~!~~!.u.~ ..~ ...~.~-~~'.!1oni~~-~!!.
C.I. Acid Blue 9, d1sodium sail y
C. I. Solvent Yellow 14
C.I. Solvenl Yellow 3 "(
C.I. Val Yellow 4
Cacodyl ic acid 1.11
i·ca~CiiiiYum' M'
Cadmium acetate
Cadmium arseni I e
f Cadmium bromide
l~a~ 1"0£u i:n _ch ~(lri~~-
Cadmium compounds, N.O.S, (b)
Cadm 1um oxide 1306-19·0 100 (a)
Cadmium stearale 2223-93·0 1 000 (al
Calcium arsenate 7778-44-1 l 000 500 (al
Calcium carbide 75-20-7 10
irc'aielumchiiimate
Calchim cpnamide
Calcium cyanide Ca(CNJ2
f316S.:t 9'."b"
156--62·7
592-01·8
'Ud'32''1'
P021
·y "'·
y
.'l'dbo"
10
~
'I
100 (a)
11/i l•w
"
Caplan [I H· isoindole- I ,3(2HJ-dione,3a.4,
7.7a· lelrahyd10·2, [(lrichloromelhyl)lhiol-1 133-06-2 10 y
Carbachol chlo1ide 51-83·2 500 (a)
Car barn ic ac•d, mel hyl. ,0·(((2,4· dimethyl- I,
3· dil hiolan-2-yllmel hylene)arnino)· 26419. 73-8 I 100 (a)
rc~ i bam1c add,. inel hyr;;i110So-, ethyl esi e1 µ1ffs:s~f 2'" [ff78"' "'{' i'
Ca1baryl !1-Napl1!halenol, melhylcatbamatel 63·25·2 '100 y
Carbofu1an 1563-66·2 10 lO(a)
C<lrbon d1sultide 75-15-0 P022 y 100 10000 y
294 CLEANUPCR!TERJA FOR SOIL AND CROUND'vVATER
Chloroethane
Ch loroetha nor
Chloroethyl chlorformate
r.Chloroform
~-~ ~ 1~;-~.~.t.~_Y_l..vi .~x !..~.t.~~r
67-66-3 U044 y 5000 10000 y
Chlo1omethyl methyl elhe1 107-30·2 U046 y 100 y
!l·Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 5000
Chi orophac 1nen e 3591-35-8 l lDOial
o-C hIm oph eno I 95-57·8 U048 y 100
t.if.:Ciiiaio'P'tie'n;.t,;tieilWe'ii-ier·~·· • ,,,,,,,, '7605_:7·2:1· """Jiii/ii I/II 5'-'000' 11 '"" - 11 I fJJ(j~IJ/ , ... , li/11///J.
I
7790·94-5
Chloro!halonil ( J ,3· Benzened!car~oltn
2,4,5 ,6·(etra. choloro·J 1897·45·6
•• •• , ........ , .,,..., ,,~., k11,,r/,- IN • f
Chloroxuron "j'93;{4']".4-'
Chloropy1 •fos 2921·88·2
Chlorthiophos 21923-23-9
Chi omic acet~te 1066-30-4 1 000
Ch1omic acid (9Cll (VAN) lJ 115-74-5 I 000
··chromic (Vil acid ..... •.,..,,,,,.(! ,.. ooo" Wff,""'.. ,,,,,,.,,,, ;'''ff"'"'''''f/1114
,_
Chromic chlorir,le
Chromic sulfate
Chromium (cl
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCF.S LIST(RCRA, CERCLA, SARA} 295
RCRA,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA,P/U Substances CERCLA EHS Toxic
Constituent CAS Number Li.st Wastes (40 CFR Part 261 J RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemical
~ ~
Cobaltous S!Jlfamate
,,,~
·iioi :;:·41~s"'
Coke ~n emi~sions
Colchidne 64-86·8
Copper (c) 7440-50·8
E~P~~d co~~~.1.~.~,
Capper cyanide Cu(CN) '" _, ...544-92·3
.,,,, ,,,,,,,,,
l CyanopMs
Cyanu1 lc fluoride
C)'cas\n
, , ··1 -1-.t~IUM
2636-26·2
675-14·9
4901-08-7
.....·.... ,,.. ............... Y'"
Cyc Ioh exa ne 110-82-7 1 000
Cyclahexanane 108-94-1 5 000
Cyclohexlmide 66-81·9 100 !al
Cyclahexylamine 108-91·8 10000
Cyclophospharn 1de 50-18·0 U058
p .~:ri"licw UfflU•r
"'roo"' .... 11
'' ~··u "·1 jy'•I .. ,..,,/
ODD
, ODE
ODT
296 CLFANUPCRFTERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATF.R
f
DecabMne (24)
J. Dec ab• omodiphe nyl oxide
i.O.~.~~\'.".~ " " ,,. '·
Demelon· 5-methyl
Di· (2· erhylhexyl· phthalale (DEHP) '!
Oialltor )
.'
Dial late
2 .4· Diaminoanisole
"2;;f oiam'io6a'rlfsoie' siiWaie ·
4.4"·Diaminodiphenyl ether
~ Oiazinon
, Oiazomethane
t.~.i-~~!a_..~.l-~c.~.~.i~~.•
Di benzl a,h la nth 1ace ne
D1 benz!a,J ]ac1 idine
D1 benzoJa,elpy1ene )
Di be nzo(a ,h 1pyrP. ne
Dibenzo[a.1 lpyiene
'i i-i:oii.le"ii:ibrC":g"1~11.·b'al'OiE! "11' r
' Dibenzofu1 an
Oibotane
Oibuty\ phthalale
Y..O.\~.~~-~-~·'· rrlr>•
Di ch lo bem I
Oichtone
rn.Oic hI010 benzene
3,3'· D1chlo1obenzidine
Oichlo1 obenzidine, N.O.S. (bl
1oi"ciliOi obiomome 111.;·~ i
Dichlo1 odir1uo1omethane
1.1 · D1chlo1oethylene 75.35.4
l ,2· Dichlo1oe1 hy!ene 540-59-0
~-~·i-~ ~-~?~ ~ ~.t.~ y_l.~~~... •~:. ~-.?. '..
Dichlo1oisop1opyl ethe1 108-60· 1 Ill i r I 1
RCRA,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA,P/U Substances CERCLA EHS Toxic
Constituent CAS Number List Wostes ( 40 CFR Port 261 ) RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemicol
re: '
Diethyl phthalate
Di ethyl su Ifate
Oietl1yl· p-nitrophenyl phosphate
Dielhylamfne ' 100
II
t l?.~thY.l.?.1.~_in~.. ·"·····m,,,,. ,-.nl •
Diet hylcarbamazi ne citrate
Diethylstilbestero
Dig1loxin
D1glycidyl et hei
Digoxm
'''•••1,•'l"'"l'l"" Jl f ~ ',lflU'll,~ rH
Dihyd1o>af1ole
Dllsop1opylfluorophosphate (Of Pl
Dimefox
D1metha.ate
, } ~~.'.~l:!!.~.~t.IJ?.~yb~~. z_\~_ ~ ~!'. "" l)i.J'J I
Dimethyl phosphorochlo1 idothioate
Dimethyl phi ha late UI (
Dimethyl sulfate 11111~ (
Dimethyl SU It ide
Di methyl· p-phenylenediamine
Oim~thYi.;ce'tiC 'aCY~f"'' ''
1 1
Dimethyldich lorosilane
l. l · D1mel hylethylamine
l. l-Dimethylhyd1az1ne I ii+'
Dimetilan L
Dinitrobenzene (m· l
·01~'itrOt;;;;~'~;·f o.
Din itrobenzene (p-}
Din ill oph en o!
2.4-Dinitiopheno!
• 2.5·D1niucphenol
......... . . . . . . .hl .......... , , , •• j1u/h
2.6-Di n itropheno
Din 1t1otoluene
2.4 -Dinitrotoluene JI
3.4-Dim\rotoluene
Dinoseb
r-rii7l'O tem
1,4-0ioxane
Oioxathion
Oiphadnone II
.~Ph~~~~~J?.Zim
Dip1opylamine 11[1
D1quat (VANJ li»J
Diquat brom 1de I
Disulfoton
Dil hiazani ne iodJde
r, oi'iiifo5iuiel~
!if
Diuron
Dodecyl benzenesulloni c acid
EPN
~ Eme tine. di hyd1 och lor(de
298 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
'I I
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCC'S LJST(RCRA. CRRCLA. SARA) 299
RCRA,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA, P/U Substances CERCLA EHS Taxic
Constituent CAS Number List Wastes (40 CFR Part 261) RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemical
Fluoroacelamlde i
'luoroac el ic acid
::!~!:~.~-~tic acid, so~~m sa1t
FI uoroac etyl ch lorjde 1 Ill
Fluorouracil I
Fonofos
F01maldehyde . ~ ~
Formaldehyde cyanohydrin I illJ
T.'ormetanat'i!'ti'ycir'oc'h'foii~e"
'01mic acid
:ormothioo
formparanate
l F~I ~.l_i_etan.•..., ....
Freon 113 (El hane, I, 1,2· I r1chlo•o· 1.2,2· Ir
Fuber id azo le
Fumar 1c acid
Fu1an lW
Fu1an, leliahyd10· I llJll
F'u".fij;:;t
Gallium l•ichloride
Glycidylal de hyde
Haloethers
Halome\hanes, N.O.S. (bl 4
. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.. . . . . . 1 •
Heplachlor
....
,
Heptachlo1 and metabolites
Heptachlo1 epoxidc ~
Kelthane 115-32-2 10 y
Ke pone 143·50·0 Ul42 y
RCRA ,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA,P/U Substances CERCLA EHS Toxic
Constituent CAS Number List Wastes (40 CFR Part 261 ) RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemical
..
Mononitrophenol (VAN)
Musi.:1mo .
i l.'.1Y~~~d- ga.~ ..
N.N Dimethylani Iine
Lii
N- NitlOSO· N· et hy IUI ea
N-Nit1 oso· N-methyl urea 11 1 ,I
N-Nitrosodi-~butylam1ne
N Nitrosodi· n-p1 opylam1ne
N·N 1t1osod1e1hanolamine
N· Nitiosodiethylamine
N· N1t1osodimethylam1ne
N-N 1trosodiphenylamine
N· Ni11osomel hylethylamine
N· N1t1osomo1 phohne
N· N itrosonom1cotme
N-Nitrosopyri ol id1 ne
N· N1t1ososa1cosine
Na led LtJ
Naptil halene
a· Naphthalenylth10111aa
Naph1nen1c acid
a- Naphthylam1ne
!l-Naphthylamine
HAZAJWOUS SUBSTANCES LJST(RCRA, CERCLA, SARA) 303
RC.RA,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA31 3
RCRA,P/U Substances CERC LA EHS Toxic
Constituent CAS Number Ust Wastes (40 CFR Part 261 ) RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemical
Nltiofen 1836'.75-5
Nit1ogen dioxide 10102·44·0 ~ >• IL
Nit1ogen mus1a1d 51· 75·2 ...
Nit1ogen muslard, Noxide 126---$5"2
ww1 - ....... 1- ,.... ~ ~1 ,, u; n '-rdli u1u.1nurr...u.uJ'.l.
Nit1ogen musta1d, hydrochlm ide sail
Nit1 ogen musta1d. N-ox1de, hyd1ochlm ide salt ~
Ouabain 530-60·4
Oxalic acid, ammonium irnn(3) sail (3:3: l) (SCI) 2944-57-4
Oxamyl 23135-22-0 Ii.ill I
Oxetane, 3.3-b1s(chlo1omethyl·) 78-71·7 Ml[i
Oxydisulfoton 2497-07-6
Jb"z"onit'' 1 10025:·15:5·~
8Paraqual methosillfale
Parathion
Paris green
'
~e nta borane
.~~~.~~~!~.~~~~.~.~.~~~.i.~-~!~
Pentachlorod1benzofurans
Pentachloroethane 76-01-7 .,
Pen1acn!orom1rnhen.zene 82-68-B
Pentachlorophenol 87·86-5 ~ ID
Pentadecylam 1ne 2570-26-5 I
r: 3:·,:;iiiitaiii'ene ""'""lllll/llJlll/lff.'
~ Phen~I, 2.4·•:Hmethyl·
Phenol, 2,4· dinitro-6-mel hyh and s r
r Phenol, 2-cyc lohexyl;4,6· din°il.r1J-
f Phenylthi'ourea
:!D9'7-"l !Hfit IHt· 1~1JJll~/ llUlll'JJ1fru1 lfJJJJUJ!~Jlllllt/JIHtl,,1111
r
~
WO
, .. 1
....
" 11u'llJllJlllJ/jj/'m"' .... .,w~11 ~~~l(XfCa)"'; 111.
.
lOO (a)
.
Phorale I ,, .
1110
Phosacetim lOOtal
l. F..~.~.s.f~I.~.~.. ',,,, 75-44-5
Phosgene
Phosmel 732-11-6 10 (a)
Phospham id on 131 71·21·6 100
Phosphine 7803·51-2 I• 500
Phosphonothiolc acid, methyl-,
0.(4-nitrophenyl) C>phenyl ester 2665-30-7
~ -?h"Osi)"tiono1tiro1c:·aaii;.'.meli\Y1~~:s:-,2:01~·"1" •
( 1-mel hylel hylJam'!noJ ethyl) 0.ethyl este1
Ph os phon othioi c acrd, methyl., 0-ethy! ().
{4· (rnethylthiolphenyl) este'r
RCRA,
Append'1x VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA,P/U Substances CERClA EHS Toxic
Constituent CAS Numbe r List Wastes (40 CFR Port 261) RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemicol
.
·P!Jo; phori c acid, tr isodr11m sa It,
dodecahydraJe (8C0(9CI)
"hosphorodilhioic ~cid, C),0-dielhy
S-melhyl esler I II
I Phosphorothioic acid, O o;o;-t1iethyl esler
In'."" "'''''""'l"'"'''"'""'"•I•·''' ,•I••• •••II•- '"'"'""""'"
PhosphmoJhioic acid. 0,0.diel hyl
Q. pyr az myl esl e1 297·97·2 P040 y 100 500
Phos phoi al hi oic acid, 0, O.d imel hyl · S
(2· me1 hyll hio) elhyl esler) 2587-90-8 Jll
Phospho1us 7723-14·0 Ul:I
[P'hosphoi u{ oryet1i0i'lae:
Phospho1 us penl achlolide
Ph osp ho1 us pen! ox Ide
P)1osphoius 1i'1c hloride II
Pip1ol~I ·st-13-o
i.~~~!~!f.~,~!-!!Y! n,,,,,.
Poly1oxy(melhyl· l ,2·elhaned1yl)J, o.·(2,4·
dichlo1ophenoxy)ace1 yl·ll· buloxy· (9CI) 53467-11·1 IW
Polychlo1 ina1ed bi phenyl (A1 ochlo1 1248) (8CI) 12672·29·6 ]I
Polychl0<inated biphenyl (A1ochlo1 1254) (8CI) 11097-69· l h:I
Pol ye hlori naled bi phenyl (A1och101 JO 16) 12674-11·2 ID
'P'o'ryc:t;10,:1;;aie<i'~li'Jfienyf(.ii:I ocfiiocT:'.l2i i""q"' 1fio:;f.'i!'S:2"''
Polychlorinaled biphenyl (A1ochlo1 1232J 11141-16-5
t>olyc hIOllll al ed bl pll e'n yl (Al oC hIOI I 2 4 2) ,53469·21-"9
Poly~hlorinated biphe.nyl (Ar«hlo1 l 26S;ll • ll0~5-B2.· 5
i~_lyc~-~~,~!~;,~phen_Y!~~~~-~~,l,,. _,:.!JJIJJJIJJJ.JJJ..~l 3~f:.~~~''""
Polychlo1 inated biphenyls, N O,S. (b)
Polynuclear a1 oma11c hydrocarbons
Potassium a1 senale 7784-41-0 l 000
Polass1um a1 senile I 0124-50·2 1 000 500
Potassium bich1 oma Ie
1>Cira5slum'cfiiomaie'"m111""'"Ull' 'I/) , '77iWi:Ycn;·
7778-50-9
11
' "
'JHiflJHI
I 000
T'ooO:
Polw;lum cyanide K(CN) 151-50-8 P098 I j
·~
1,3· P1opane sullone 1120-71-4 r
P1opane, l ,2 ,3· I richlo10· 96-18·4
P1opane, 1,2-dibromo·3·chloro· 96·12·8
' .,, "
U066
'11111/llffl!
• ..
/"P1o'ilaile:'~lcli!~'o7,~ rfo:s:·1 ~Jlj
1· I
,.
1 P1opano!, dich!oro-, N;O.S. (b) ' 26545-n..J
1" 1: ''lit
306 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Propargite
<>1 opargyl alcohol
P1opa1gyl b1omide
<>1opiolactone, () r
\f ~'?Pi?f!.~ !~~-~Y1.e ,, 11111w-111111mJ l,1ltt17JJJJ,111;;J. ~J. ,,,/f~
P1opionic acid 79-09-4 5 000
P1op1onic anhyd1 ide 123-62·6 5 000
P1opoxu1 t Phenol,2-\ 1-me\tiyle\hIDyi·,
methylcarbamatel 114-26· 1 y
·~
P1op1 iophenone, 4-amino· 70-69·9
rrop"yi'ci{iiirriiimii'ie
n-P1 opyl~mine r
Propylene (Propene) I
Propylene dichloride
L~~~P¥.lene ~xide 75.55:9
IJ11 u11~,,,-.,
1,2· P1 opylenimlne 75.55.3 P067 y 10 000 y
P1oplthiouracil 51-52-5 y
Prothoate 2275-18-5 100 (a)
Py1ene 129-00·0 5000 l 000 (a)
Py1eth11n 1 121-21· l
Pyreth11n 2
Py1ethrins (8Cll
Py1idine
Py1idine, 2-methyl
Pyridine. 2· methyl· 5-vlnyl
Pyridine, 4-am ino- 504-24-5
Pyridine, 4-nitro-. 1-oxide 1124-33-0
Py1iminil 53558-25· 1
Qulnoffne 91-22-5
Radionuclides
Reserpine 5Q:"55.5 U200 5000
Resorcinol 108-46·3 U201 5000
Saccha11n and salts 81-07·2 U202 y
Safrole 94.59. 7 U203 y y
Salcomlne 14167-18-1 500 (a)
s~rln 107-44-8 10
Selen ious acid 7783-00·8 U204 y 10 I 000 (a)
Selenium (cl 7782-49·2 y 100 y
Selenium compounds. N.O.S (b) y
Selenium dioxide 7446-08-4 10
Selenium disulfide 7485-:--~4 uzos 'l
Selenium oxychlo1 Ide 7791-23·3 I 500
Seleno111ea 630-10-4 ?103 y 1 000
Semlcarbazlde hyd1ochlo1 id2 563-41-7 1 000 (al
Silane (4-aminobut~~metnyl 3037.72-7 l 000
Silve1 (c) 7440-22·4 t y
Silve1 compounds, N .O.S. (bl r
Si lve1 cyanide Ag(CN) 506-64·9
Silve1 nit1ale 7761-88-8
Silvex (2,4.5-TPJ 93-72-1
Sodium 7440-23-5
Sodium a1senate 7631-89·2
Sodium arsemte 7784-46·5 500 (a)
Sodium azide 26628-22-8 500
Sodium bichrom~te 10588-01·9
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES UST(l~CRA. CERCI.A. SARA) 307
RCRA,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA,P/U Substances CERCLA EHS Tox'1c
Constituent CAS Number List Wastes (40 CFR Part 261) R,Q, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemical
RCRA,
Appendix VIII SARA SARA313
RCRA, P/U Substonces CERCLA EHS Toxic
Constituent CAS Number List Wostes (40 CFR Po rt 261 ) RQ, lbs TPQ, lbs Chemicol
(bl Tho abbro•iation N.O.S. (not ol l>orwi'" •J>Kilied) sign iii•• I hose momoors ol lho gon•1al cla" not speeil <cally Ii" od b1 name,
(c) No reporting ol reloa'"' ol I Ms hozaulous subst.nce is 1oqui1ed if d iamolo1 o! I l>o pieces ol lho solid metol •oloased is equal lo 01 "'co eds 100 micromolers (0.004 Inc ho<).
(dl The 10porublo qu•nlity Im a•tl<•t°' ls llmll ed Io I 1ia blo fo1ms only.
Alabama Connecticut
Arnold P. Mayberry Richard Fil
Department of Environmental Management Department of Environmental Protection
P.O. Box 301463 165 Capital Ave.
Montgomery, AL 36130-1463 Hartford, CT 06106
Phone: 205-260-2792 Phone: 203-566-5486
Alaska Delaware
Richard Cormack Karl Kalbacher
Division of Spill Prevention and Response Superfund Branch
Department of Environmental Conservation Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
410 Willoughby Ave. 715 Grantham Lane
Juneau, AK 99801-1795 New Castle, DE 19720
Phone: 907-465-5204 Phone: 302-323-4540
Arkansas Florida
Jerry Delazan Couillermo Wibmer
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
PO Box 8913 Department of Environmental Regulation
Little Rock, AR 72219 2600 Blain Stone Rd.
Phone: 501-562-6533 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400
Phone: 904-488-0190
California
Fran Anderson Georgia
Site Mitigation Jim McNamara
Dept. of Toxic Substance Control Hazardous Waste Management
P.O. Box 806 Department of Natural Resources
Sacramento, CA 95812-0806 205 Butler St., S.E.
Phone:916-255-3618 Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone:404-656-2833
Colorado
George Moradec Hawaii
Groundwater Steve Armann
Department of Health Environmental Management Division
WQCD-GWPS-B2 Department of Health
Denver, CO 80222-1530 Five Waterfront Plaza, Suite 250
Phone: 303-692-3584 Honolulu, HI 96813
Phone: 808-586-4249
313
314 CLEANUP CRITERIA FDR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
Idaho Maine
Clyde Cody Fred Lavallee, P.E.
Department of Environmental Quality Bureau of Hazardous Materials and Solid Waste Control
1410 N. Hilton Department of Environmental Protection
Boise, ID 83706 Station #17, State House
Phone: 208-334-0556 Augusta, ME 04333
Phone: 207-289-2651
Illinois
Terri Myers Maryland
Division of Land Pollution Control Tasti Dehghni
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Department of Environment
2200 Churchill Rd. 2500 Borening Highway
Springfield, IL 62794-9276 Baltimore, MD 21224
Phone: 217-524-4863 Phone: 410-631-3462
Indiana Massachusetts
Margie Thomas Matt Cogliano
Office of Environmental Response Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
Department of Environmental Management Department of Environmental Protection
PO Box 6015 One Winter St.
Indianapolis, IN 46204 Boston, MA 02 l 08
Phone: 317-233-6455 Phone: 617-292-5990
Iowa Michigan
Paul Nelson Seg Norgbey, Ph.D.
UST Section Environmental Response Division
Department of Natural Resources Department of Natural Resources
900 E. Grande PO Box 30028
Des Moines, IA 50319 Lansing, MI 48909
Phone: 515-281-8934 Phone: 517-373-4808
Kansas Minnesota
Rachel Miller Gary Pulford
Division of Environment Solid Waste Division
Department of Health and Environment Pollution Control Agency
Forbes Field, Bldg. 740 520 Lafayette Rd.
Topeka, KS 66620-7500 St. Paul, MN 55155-4194
Phone: 913-296-1684 Phone: 612-296-7290
Kentucky Mississippi
Jerry O'Bryan Ken Whitten
UST Branch, Corrective Action Section, Div. of Waste Mgmt. Department of Environmental Quality
Department for Environmental Protection PO Box 10385
14 Reilly Rd. Jackson, MS 39289-0385
Frankfort, KY 40601-1190 Phone: 601-961-5054
Phone: 502-564-6716
Missouri
Louisiana Karen Northup
Louis Johnson Hazardous Waste Program
Groundwater Protection Division Department of Natural Resources
Department of Environmental Conservation PO Box 176
PO Box 82215 Jefferson City, MO 65102
Baton Rouge, LA 70884-2215 Phone: 314-751-8333
Phone: 504-765-0585
APPENDIX C: STATE AGENCY ADDRESSES 315
Vermont
David Shepard
Hazardous Materials Management Division
Dept. of Environmental Conservation (Agency of Natural
Resource)
103 South Main St.
Waterbury, VT 05671-0404
Phone: 802-241-3888
Appendix D: USER'S GUIDE TO
DS 64 SEARCH SOFTWARE
Features
OS 64 Cleanup Software
• In general, main menu prompts or prompts at the bot-
tom of the screen will guide you through the search Version 1.00
process.
• The system allows you to view data on the screen or as INSTALLATION
printed output.
• Searchable data -in the system is comprised of cleanup You will be asked to specify a
criteria for soil and groundwater by state. Cleanup crite- destination disk drive and
ria is also included from several of the tables in DS 64 as subdirectory.
follows:
Table I-Representative Limits of Detection. The OS 64 CLEANUP program requires
Table 4-Action Levels Under RCRA Corrective Action.
that the system FILES be set to at
Table 8-EPA Current and Proposed Drinking Water
least 30 in your CONFIG.SYS file.
Standards.
Table 9-Superfund Proposed Soil Screening Levels After installation, please check
(SSLs). your CONFIG.SYS file and adjust if
Table IO-EPA PCB Contaminated Soil Cleanup Policy. necessary.
Table I I-Background Concentrations of Elements in
Soils. You may press <Esc> at any time to
Table I 2-Contaminant Indicator Criteria Used by The cancel the installation process.
Netherlands.
Table 13-Maximum Allowable Concentrations (MAC) Press [Esc] to quit, and any other
and Tentative Allowable Concentrations (TAC) key to continue ...
of Contaminants in Soil in the Soviet Union
(as of 1984).
Table I4-Alberta, Canada, Suggested Cleanup
Guidelines for Inorganics in Soils.
Table I 5-0ntario, Canada, Cleanup Guidelines for Soils.
Table I 6-Quebec, Canada, Groundwater and Soil
On which disk drive do you wish to
Contamination Indicators.
install OS 64 Cleanup Software?
Table I 7-Tentative "Trigger Concentrations" for
Selected Inorganics in the United Kingdom.
Table I 8-Reference Thresholds for Soil Pollutants Used Drive C:
by France. Drive D:
• Criteria may be browsed for each state or table including Drive E:
a comments section, reference section, numeric criteria Drive F:
section, contact information section, and if applicable Drive I:
footnote section. The user may also browse the database Drive M:
by defining his/her own search criteria, for example, Drive N:
search for all numeric criteria for a state(s) for a given Drive O:
chemical for groundwater.
Drive P:
Drive Q:
System Requirements Drive R:
To run the DS 64 search software you need the following: Drive s:
• An IBM or IBM compatible PC (Model 286 or later) with
640 kbytes RAM.
• 530 Kbytes available executable memory.
• A VGA or monochrome monitor.
• DOS operating system, Ver. 3.0 or above.
• I 0 Mbytes of available disk storage
320 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
TUTORIAL
Please specify a subdirectory for
Following the first two introductory copyright screens, the
OS 64 Cleanup Software Main Menu appears as follows:
(Press <Enter> to accept the
current selection)
MAIN MENU
Please enter the Subdirectory Name:
\DS64 A - Browse Database by
State/Federal/Other Country
B - Design Your Own Search Criteria
Upon completing the choice of the subdirectory name, hit
C - Printer Setup
the enter key, and the system will install the programs, build
the indexes, and leave the following message: D - Quit and exit program
Note the first time you enter the program, the in-
dexes for the search software are built. This will take
approximately 5 minutes. Hereafter, when you type
DS64 to enter the system, you will directly enter the
program.
cd\DS64 <Enter>
DS64 <Enter>
USER'S GUIDE TO DS 64 SEARCH SOFTWARE 321
MAIN INFORMATION
State: CO Table: Fed Reg.:
Comments:
1. A compliance standard different from a listed standard and equal to the
background level of a constituent may be allowed.
Reference:
(1) Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Commission,
Basic Standards for Groundwater, Regulation 3.11.0, 17 October, 1991.
Select from the functions at the bottom of the screen to T- Table Search: Allows you to select and move to the next
browse the database as follows: federal or other country table you would like to browse. For
example, to view Table 10-EPA PCB Contaminated Soil
A - Zoom Comments: Allows you to browse the entire Cleanup Policy, select T and type, 10.
comments for a particular state, federal, or other country
table in DS 64. E - Print: Allows you to print the criteria you are currently
viewing.
B - Zoom Reference: Allows you to browse the entire Ref-
erence Section for a particular state, federal, or other country Q- Quit: Allows you to return to the Main Menu.
table in DS 64.
V - View: Allows you to view and search all of the criteria for
N - Next: Allows you to move to the next state, federal, or the state, federal or other country table you are currently
other country table in ascending alphabetic order. viewing. The screen contains the following choices:
A. Address: Allows you to view contact names and ad-
P- Previous: Allows you to move to the previous state, fed- dresses.
eral, or other country table in descending alphabetic order. B. Numerical Criteria: Allows you to view numeric criteria
for soil and groundwater by chemical, CAS Number, or Syno-
S - State Search: Allows you to select and move to the next nym (See example screen below).
state table you would like to browse, by typing in the 2 letter
state abbreviation. For example, to view the table for NJ, se-
lect S, and type in the 2 letter state abbreviation, NJ.
322 CLEANUP CRITERIA FOR SOIL AND GROUNDWATER
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater
Standard
To scroll the information on the screen, use the up and Option B: Design Your Own Search Criteria
down arrows to move through the list of constituents and the Select Option B if you would like to design your own
left and right arrows to view all soil and groundwater criteria search criteria. The following User Defined Search Criteria
for a particular constituent. Screen will appear. This screen contains options for designing
The bottom of the screen has functions that allow you to your own search criteria and viewing and printing the results
search the criteria by Chemical Name (F), by Chemical Syno- of your search.
nym (S), or by CAS Number (L). Select Q - Quit to return to Column 1 gives options for Search Criteria as follows:
the previous screen.
C. Numerical Footnote: Allows you to view any footnotes
designated by asterisks that clarify items in the Numerical Cri-
teria.
Q. Quit: Returns you to the previous Main Information
screen.
OUTPUT: Screen
USER'S GUIDE TO DS 64 SEARCH SOFTWARE 323
C - Chemicals: Allows you to select all chemicals or a se- E - Existing Proposed: Allows you to choose between
lection of chemicals. If you choose to make a selection of existing or proposed, or both, for Regulations and Guidelines
chemicals, a screen containing a list of the CAS numbers and selected in Option D.
chemical names appears as follows:
F - View Search Criteria: Allows you to see a printout on
the screen of the search criteria you have selected.
eASNO Name
00-00-10 Total PNA (non-carcinogens) Note: If you do not make a selection from A through
00-00-11 Oil/Grease F, the default for each of these options is All.
00-00-12 Total Oil or Kerosene
00-00-13 Total Gasoline At the bottom center of the screen under Miscellaneous
00-00-14 Total Hydrocarbons are options for printing (L), clearing search criteria (M), and
00-00-17 Barium, Barium Sulfate returning to the Main Menu (Q). When you are finished se-
lecting criteria and output options, select L for printing. Select
00-00-19 Total voe
whether you would like to print the results of your search to
00-00-20 Total, Semi-voe the screen or the printer. If you would like to design a new
00-00-21 Individual Semi-voe search criteria, select M to clear previously designed search
00-00-22 Total Pesticides criteria. Then select Options A through F to design the new
search criteria.
F - Find Name F6 - To mark and Column 2 contains options for what parts of output you
L - Locase eAS RN unmark would like to select as follows:
V - View Synonyms Q - To save selec- G - Contact Information
tions and exit H-Comments
I - Reference
J - Chemical Information
You now have the option to search this list by chemical K-All
name (F) or by CAS Number (L). In addition, you can scroll
Select what part(s) (or all) of the information you would like
through the list using the up and down arrows on your key-
to output. The program will then search the database and out-
board. If you are unsure of the chemical name, you may
put your results to the screen or the printer. After viewing or
search the synonym table by choosing the V - View Synonym
printing the data, you may view or print it again. Search crite-
option. From the synonym list you can obtain the CAS Num-
ria you defined remains in memory until you choose M to
ber of the chemical in question and then select Q to return to
clear the search criteria, design a new search criteria, or exit
the Chemical Selection screen. The cursor should be at the
the program.
corresponding CAS Number and chemical name for the syno-
An example of a user defined search follows. The search is
nym you selected. Once you have found the chemical, mark
for the state of Minnesota, the chemical Butanol, for both soil
the chemical by selecting the F6 key. If you wish to deselect
and groundwater, all regulations, guidelines, and in-develop-
a chemical simply highlight that chemical and select F6. Con-
ment, and both existing and proposed. All parts of output
tinue this process until you are done selecting chemicals.
were chosen (K-all). The printed output for this search is as
When you are finished selecting chemicals, select the Q key to
follows:
save selections and return to the User Defined Search Criteria
Screen.
USER'S GUIDE TO DS 64 SEARCH SOFTWARE 325
MINNESOTA
STATUS
D Regulation [8J Guideline
D Exists [8J Exists 05/28/92
D Proposed D Proposed
D In Development DSoil
D Expected Availability D Groundwater
[8J Both Soil & Groundwater
DNone DOther
COMMENTS
1. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) establishes (c) adjustment to levels such that groundwater contaminants
groundwater cleanups goals based on a site-specific evalu- do not pose an unacceptable risk based on site-specific risk
ation of risks and the following: assessment.
(a) prevention of any further groundwater degradation 4. Soil cleanup criteria are based on a site-specific risk as-
where recommended allowable limits (RALs) and maximum sessment considering the following routes of exposure: inges-
contaminant levels (MCLs) are not exceeded or risk is below tion, dermal contact, inhalation, and migration of contami-
1 in 100,000 for carcinogens; nants in soil to groundwater.
(b) remediation to RALs and 1 in 100,000 cumulative risk for
carcinogens, or to MCLs, whichever is more restrictive, for
sites involving groundwater already exceeding RALs or
MCLs;or
REFERENCE
1. MPCA compilation of Groundwater Rules and Regulations, Super- 3. Recommended allowable Limits for Drinking Water Contaminants,
fund Program, Approach of Minnesota Superfund Program to MN Dept. of Health, Health Risk Assessment Section, Release No. 3,
Groundwater. Jan. 1991.
2. MPCA memorandum, Site Reponse Soil Cleanup Procedures, 28
May 1992.
Contact: Gary Pulford
Office: Solid Waste Division
Agency: Pollution Control Agency
Address: 520 Lafayette Rd.
St. Paul, MN 55155-4194
Phone: 612-296-7290
NUMERICAL CRITERIA
Groundwater Groundwater
Recommended Allowable Umits Groundwater