SAR

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION
REPORT OF
THE SEVENTH MEETING OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA TRAFFIC FLOW REVIEW
GROUP (SCSTFRG/7)
MANILA, PHILIPPINES, 05 – 07 NOVEMBER 2018
The views expressed in this Report should be taken as those of the

Meeting and not the Organization.
Approved by the Meeting

and published by the ICAO Asia and Pacific Office, Bangkok
SCSTFRG/7
Table of Contents
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION i
Meeting i
Attendance i
Officers and Regional Sub-Office i
Opening of the Meeting i
Documentation and Working Language i
REPORT ON AGENDA ITEMS
Agenda Item 1: Adoption of Agenda 1
Agenda Item 2: Review of the Current and Planned CNS/ATM Capabilities and 1
Identifying Associated Reduced Horizontal Separation
Agenda Item 3: Review of the Existing TF Route Structures in SCS Airspace and 4
Identifying Priorities
Agenda Item 4: Discussion on PBN Routes Development and FLAS/FLOS 5
Optimization
Agenda Item 5: Review and Update of the Task List of SCSTFRG 9
Agenda Item 6: Decisions/Recommendations to SEACG 9
Agenda Item 7: Any Other Business 9
Date and Venue of the Next Meeting 10
Closing of the Meeting 10
APPENDIXES
Appendix A: List of Participants A-1
Appendix B: List of Working and Information Papers B-1
Appendix C: Meeting Agenda C-1
Appendix D: Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore Side Meeting Summary D-1
Appendix E: Hong Kong China, Indonesia and Philippines Side Meeting Summary E-1
Appendix F: SCSTFRG Task List F-1

SCSTFRG/7
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
Meeting
1.1. The Seventh Meeting of the South China Sea Traffic Flow Review Group (SCSTFRG/7)
was held at Savoy Hotel, Manila, Philippines, from 5 to 7 November 2018.
Attendance
2.1. The meeting was attended by 36 participants, from 7 States/Administration and 4

International Organizations including Hong Kong China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore,
Thailand, United States of America, IATA, ICCAIA, IFATCA and ICAO.
2.2. A list of participants is appended at Appendix A to this report.
Officers & Regional Sub-Office
3.1. Mr. Jamil Khir Bin Mohamed, Director of Kuala Lumpur Air Traffic Control Centre, Civil
Aviation Authority of Malaysia presided over the meeting throughout its duration as Chair of
SCSTFRG.
3.2. Mr. Mior Adli Bin Mior Sallehhuddin, Regional Officer ATM (AOM-ASM) and Mr. Yan
Yonggang, Regional Officer ATM (AOM-FUA) from the ICAO Asia and Pacific Regional Sub-Office
acted as the Secretaries for the meeting.
Opening of the Meeting
4.1. Capt. Donaldo A. Mendoza, Deputy Director General for Operations, Civil Aviation
Authority of the Philippines welcomed participants of the meeting to Manila, Philippines.
4.2. Mr. Jamil Khir Bin Mohamed, Chairman of the SCSTFRG welcomed participants to the
meeting, and encouraged the group members to continue with their excellent efforts on pushing forward
the optimisation of the airspace structure in South China Sea area.
Documentation and Working Language
5.1. The working language of the meeting and all documentation was English. There were 09
Working Papers (WP) and 08 Information Papers (IP) considered by the meeting.
5.2. A list of papers is appended at Appendix B to this report.
i
SCSTFRG/7
Reports on Agenda Items
REPORT ON AGENDA ITEMS
Agenda Item 1: Adoption of Agenda (WP01)
1.1. The provisional agenda, as listed in Appendix C to this report was adopted by the meeting.
1.2. The list of Working and Information Papers (IP01) was noted.
Agenda Item 2: Review of the Current and Planned CNS/ATM Capabilities and Identifying
Associated Reduced Horizontal Separation
Review of the South China Sea Operational Concept (WP02)
2.1. ICAO presented the South China Sea Operational Concept, which was adopted at the
APANPIRG/27. This Operational Concept was originally expected to be implemented by 09
November 2017, and so far there were only minimum progress been made in terms of the
implementation of RNAV 2/RNP 2 routes, removing the application of Flight Level Allocation Scheme
(FLAS) and application of more efficient Air Traffic Control (ATC) standards.
2.2. Based on the results of survey conducted by ICAO Asia and Pacific Regional Office, which
was also presented at the Sixth Meeting of the ATM Sub-Group of APANPIRG (ATM/SG/6), it was
noted that several States/Administrations were not applying ATC standards correctly, preferring to use
larger, less efficient separations. This event also affected safety due to the increased ATC workload
managing larger spacing, and more conflicts.
2.3. States/Administration were urged to review and leverage their CNS/ATM system
capability by optimising the service levels that new systems were capable of under the Asia/Pacific
Seamless ATM Plan.
2.4. Upon query from the Philippines, the Secretariat informed that they would seek ICAO Asia
and Pacific Regional Office clarification on why the application of 10 Nautical Miles (NM) horizontal
separation in airspace with ATS surveillance (‘Category S airspace’) in Manila Flight Information
Region (FIR) was indicated as non-compliance with the Asia/Pacific Seamless ATM Plan expectations.
Enhancement of Horizontal Separation on ATS Route M768 (WP09)
2.5. Indonesia presented the proposal to reduce the horizontal separation on ATS route M768
from 80NM to 50NM, based on RNP 10, for consideration by the States concerned. This proposal
was initially discussed as a sideline during SCSTFRG/6, and its rational was to better accommodate the
increase in air traffic on this route.
2.6. The States concerned who were present at this meeting agreed to this proposal. However,
due to the absence of Cambodia and Viet Nam, which would also be affected by this proposal, the
meeting agreed that offline discussion among all the States concerned were necessary before providing
any implementation timeline. Singapore agreed to be the lead for the initiative, and would also
coordinate with Cambodia and Viet Nam.
1
SCSTFRG/7
2.7. IATA thanked the States concerned for their encouraging and positive response, and
suggested the States concerned to also consider reducing the horizontal separation to 30NM in the
future.
2.8. A summary of the outcomes from a side meeting between Indonesia, Malaysia and
Singapore conducted during the SCSTFRG/7 is provided in Appendix D.
Information Updates to the New Philippine ATM Center (IP03)
2.9. The new Philippine Air Traffic Management Center (ATMC) was inaugurated in January
2018. The Philippines’ Aeronautical Message Handling System (AMHS) and Aeronautical
Information System (AIS) services had started operations in the new Philippine ATMC since February
2018 and July 2018 respectively, and as planned, the ATM services would be last to move to the new
Philippine ATMC (expected on 15 November 2018).
2.10. There would be changes to the Manila Area Control Centre (ACC) ATC sectorisation
where the number of ATC sectors were expected to increase from four to eight in the new Philippine
ATMC. It was also noted that there were plans to increase the number of ATC sectors to nine in 2019,
and with an ultimate target of 11 ATC sectors in future.
2.11. With the nationwide upgrade to a highly automated and integrated CNS and ATM system,
including ATS Inter-Facility Datalink Communication (AIDC), Automatic Dependant Surveillance –
Contract (ADS-C) and Controller Pilot Datalink Communications (CPDLC), enhanced surveillance and
PBCS capability, Philippines would now concentrate on optimising the main traffic flows within the
Manila FIR. Current plan involved enhancement of longitudinal spacing on ATS route A461, A583,
L625 and N892 from 80NM to 50NM, and would then progressively discuss with adjacent States to
further enhance to 30NM.
2.12. The meeting congratulated Philippines on the new Philippine ATMC, and hoped that the
transition from the old ATMC to the new Philippine ATMC would run smoothly and successfully
according to plan.
2.13. Hong Kong China and Philippines agreed to enhance the longitudinal spacing from 80NM
to 50NM on ATS route A461 and A583. A summary of the outcomes from a side meeting between
Hong Kong China, Indonesia and Philippines conducted during the SCSTFRG/7 is provided in
Appendix E.
ADS-C/CPDLC Planned Implementation in Manila FIR (IP04)
2.14. Philippines presented an update on the ADS-C/CPDLC implementation plan. The ADS-
C/CPDLC system was under-going system testing at the new Philippine ATMC, and it was noted that
trial implementation of the ADS-C/CPDLC system would be continued soon after the successful
transition of ATM operation from the old ATMC to the new Philippine ATMC, expected on 15
November 2018.
2
SCSTFRG/7
2.15. The planned ADS-C/CPDLC operation areas (Figure 1) and implementation dates were
West Pacific Airspace (East Sector) – to be implemented in first quarter of 2019; and South China Sea
(North & West Sectors) – to be implemented in second quarter of 2019.
Figure 1. Manila ACC planned ADS-C/CPDLC operation areas
Ujung Pandang ACC Re-Sectorisation Programme (IP05)
2.16. Indonesia provided information on the Ujung Pandang ACC Re-Sectorisation Programme
(Phase III), which the Ujung Pandang ACC ATC sectors would be increased to nine working positions
by 6 December 2018 to cope with current and forecasted traffic demand. The re-sectorisation of Ujung
Pandang ACC was aimed at spreading the number of conflict points within a sector, achieving capacity-
demand balance while managing the ATC workload and ensuring an orderly flow of air traffic.
2.17. The meeting was informed that the Letter of Coordination Agreement between Ujung
Pandang ACC and Brisbane ACC had been revised to include the changes on coordination procedures
effected by the re-sectorisation of Ujung Pandang ACC. The next action was to revise the Letter of
Coordination Agreement between Ujung Pandang ACC and Jakarta ACC, and Manila ACC.
Initiatives to Optimize Airspace Capacity in Hong Kong FIR (IP08)
2.18. Hong Kong China had engaged a consultant to conduct en-route airspace review earlier
this year, and depending on the outcomes of this review, Hong Kong China would commence airspace
and air routes re-structuring programmes to enhance Hong Kong FIR airspace capacity, in a safe and
efficient manner.
2.19. At the bi-lateral meeting between Hong Kong ACC and Taipei ACC in early October 2018,
both ACCs had agreed to apply 20NM horizontal separation at waypoint ELATO and ENVAR, with
the following conditions:
a) Westbound traffic routing via ELATO, destination VHHH and VMMC only; and
3
SCSTFRG/7
b) Eastbound traffic routing via ELATO and ENVAR, destination airports within Taibei
and Fukuoka FIRs only.
Implementation date was planned for January 2019, subject to satisfactory outcome of safety
assessment.
2.20. Hong Kong China would engage China at the earliest opportunity to discuss a phased
reduction of longitudinal spacing on ATS route L642, M771, A1/P901 and SIKOU, in 2019.
Agenda Item 3: Review of the Existing TF Route Structures in SCS Airspace and Identifying
Priorities
Optimisation of ATS Routes M771 and L642 (WP05)
3.1. Singapore presented proposals to address SCSTFRG/3 WP03 identified Priority Area 2:
L642/M771 – the possibility of implementing parallel routes for L642 and M771. This paper took
into account the Asia/Pacific Seamless ATM Plan and proposed States/Administration to designate ATS
routes L642, M771 and N892 as RNP 2 or RNAV 2 to enable the implementation of two additional
parallel routes (Figure 2), which would complement the utilisation of ATS routes M771 and L642.
Figure 2. Proposed parallel routes to L642 and M771
3.2. The meeting was provided with the potential benefits of the proposals, which included the
optimisation of route capacity, additional layer of safety and possible mitigation to Large Scale Weather
Deviation (LSWD) contingency procedures.
4
SCSTFRG/7
3.3. The meeting agreed to designate ATS route L642, M771 and N892 as RNAV 2/RNP 2 to
enable reduction of lateral separation and Air Traffic Management Research Institute (ATMRI) to
conduct the simulations based on existing modelling and simulations capabilities to determine the
effectiveness and facilitate in the analysis of the proposal.
3.4. The members of the SCSTFRG who were present at this meeting agreed for Monitoring
Agency for Asia Region (MAAR) to provide the December 2017 Traffic Sample Data (TSD) for Hong
Kong, Kota Kinabalu, Kuala Lumpur, Manila and Singapore FIRs to ATMRI for the purpose of
modelling and simulation. The secretariat would liaise with China (for Sanya FIR) and Viet Nam for
their consensus to share their TSD with ATMRI.
Updated WPAC/SCS 2017 Traffic Sample Data Visualisation (IP07)
3.5. MAAR presented an updated visualisation of traffic flows in the Western Pacific and South
China Sea (WPAC/SCS) based on 2017 TSD received from the relevant States with additional data
received from China Regional Monitoring Agency. The additional data was for Sanya FIR, which
included traffic flow analysis on ATS routes A1, L642 and M771.
3.6. The traffic flow analysis was based on December 2017 TSD, and due to the lack of
information, the visual presentation of the traffic flow (Figure 3) did not include traffic flow analysis
on ATS route A202 within Sanya FIR. Blue lines represent westbound movements and orange lines
represent eastbound movements.
Figure 3. Visual presentation of traffic flow within WPAC/SCS based on 2017 TSD
Agenda Item 4: Discussion on PBN Routes Development and FLAS/FLOS Optimization
Asia/Pacific Region ATS Route Catalogue (WP03)
5
SCSTFRG/7
4.1. ICAO presented the most recent Version 17 of the Asia/Pacific Region ATS Route
Catalogue, and the focus of this group was to review and update the route proposals contained in
Chapter 2 of the Catalogue. States were urged to review and categorise route proposals as ‘not
possible’, ‘short term’ (within 12 months), ‘medium term’ (within 12-36 months) and ‘long term’
(possible after 36 months).
4.2. There was no update provided by the States/Administration on the route proposals
contained in Chapter 2 of the Asia/Pacific Region ATS Route Catalogue. ICAO informed the meeting
that similar paper would again be raised during the Twenty-Sixth Meeting of the South-East Asia ATS
Coordination Group (SEACG/26) from 1 to 4 April 2019 in Bangkok, Thailand. ICAO reminded the
States/Administration to come prepared to discuss relevant route proposals during SEACG/26.
4.3. ICAO also informed the meeting that the management of the Asia/Pacific Region ATS
Route Catalogue had been handed over to ICAO Asia and Pacific Regional Sub-Office; therefore,
communications related to this Catalogue should be made via email to apac-rso@icao.int.
Southeast Asia Route Review Implementation Plan Proposals (WP04)
4.4. ICAO presented the Southeast Asia Route Review Implementation Plan Proposals, which
were originally proposed by the Southeast Asia Route Review Task Force (SEA-RR/TF). The SEA-
RR/TF met six times prior to its being dissolved, and the on-going tasks were delegated to existing
bilateral or multilateral groups, i.e. South East Asia ATS Coordination Group (SEACG), Mekong Air
Traffic Management Coordination Group Meeting (MK-ATM/CG) and East Asia ATM Coordination
Group (EATMCG).
4.5. SEACG through the SEACG/22 had referred the following route proposals to the
SCSTFRG for review.
a) SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 5, M756 TSN-ENREP;
b) SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 10, L628;
c) SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 11, M768;
d) SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 14, M771; and
e) SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 15, L642.
Details of these route proposals were provided in SCSTFRG/7 WP04 Attachment A, B, C and D.
4.6. Due to the absence of Viet Nam, the meeting agreed for the route proposals SEA Route
Review Implementation Plan Proposal 5, M756 TSN-ENREP and SEA Route Review Implementation
Plan Proposal 10, L628 to be reviewed at the SCSTFRG/8 or SEACG/26, depending on which meeting
would take place earlier.
4.7. For SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 11, M768, the meeting agreed for
this route proposal to be considered being removed from SEACG Task List, and to concentrate on
reduction of longitudinal spacing on ATS route M768 from 80NM to 50NM based on RNP 10 with the
possibility of reducing it further to 30NM in the future.
6
SCSTFRG/7
4.8. For SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 14 and 15, M771 and L642, the
meeting agreed for these route proposals to be considered being removed from SEACG Task List, and
to concentrate on route proposal SCS01 and SCS02 of the Asia/Pacific Region ATS Route Catalogue.
Review of South China Sea FLOS (WP06)
4.9. IFATCA highlighted that since the inception of the Modified Single Alternate Flight Level
Orientation Scheme (FLOS) and FLAS in the South China Sea area, there had been a number of
significant changes to the traffic levels, particularly to the secondary crossing routes. The present
traffic demand on some secondary crossing routes resulted in additional ATC workload and ground
delays, which was totally contrary to the original purpose of the South China Sea Modified Single
Alternate FLOS and FLAS.
4.10. Based on the statistical data and analysis of the information provided by MAAR and Civil
Aviation Bureau of Japan at various regional review meetings, it had clearly indicated that the traffic
numbers on the primary routes N892/L625 and N884/M767 have shown a low rate of growth.
Whereas, the traffic numbers on the secondary crossing routes A461 and A583 in the north, and M758
and M761 in the south of the South China Sea area have shown far above average growth rates. It was
therefore difficult to justify the continued use of the distribution of flight levels that was implemented
16 years ago.
4.11. It was also noted that MAAR had consistently highlighted the Manila/Taipei and
Manila/Fukuoka FIR boundaries as ‘Large Height Deviation (LHD) Hotspots’ because of the number
of flight level discrepancy events that occurred in these areas. This was due to the requirement for
transitions between the Standard Single Alternate system (compliance with ICAO Annex 2, Appendix
3a) used in Taipei and Fukuoka FIRs and the Modified Single Alternate FLOS used in the South China
Sea area.
4.12. IFATCA also commented on the South China Sea LSWD procedures that reduces the
capacity of the affected routes by 50% due to the ad hoc and reactive nature of the implementation
process. The meeting noted that in Europe and North America, an organised and pre-coordinated
contingency route system was established with a minimal reduction in airspace capacity. United
States of America advised that they would provide a briefing on their 'Playbook' process in proactively
managing major weather events at the SEACG/26.
4.13. Noting the above, and taking advantage of the improved CNS and ATM systems
capabilities over the entire South China Sea area, IFATCA proposed the following proposals:
a) Phase 1: Revision of FLAS on selected ATS routes.
Re-allocation of two of the six flight levels on the primary routes N892, L625, N884
and M767 (one eastbound and one westbound) to the secondary crossing routes A461,
A583, M758 and M761. The remaining four flight levels on the primary routes
would provide adequate capacity under normal circumstances to satisfy the traffic
demand. The additional capacity that one flight level in each direction on the
7
SCSTFRG/7
secondary crossing routes would relieve some of the delays and restrictions that are
currently imposed on traffic.
b) Phase 2: Revision of FLOS on selected ATS routes.
Consideration should be given to resolving the long-standing safety issues that the
South China Sea Modified Single Alternate FLOS continues to generate at the
boundaries of area, specifically those of the Manila, Taipei and Fukuoka FIRs. A
revision of the FLOS on the primary routes N892/L625 and N884/M767, from the
South China Sea FLOS to the ICAO Standard Single Alternate FLOS would serve the
purpose of removing the need to transition flights at the Manila FIR boundary and
thereby resolve the LHD safety issues.
c) Phase 3: Normalised South China Sea Modified Single Alternate FLOS to standard
FLOS
4.14. After lengthy deliberation, the meeting agreed for the review of existing FLAS/FLOS
operating within the South China Sea with a view to enhancing efficiencies to be accorded as Priority
Area 4 of the SCSTFRG. Discussion on this Priority Area 4 would take place after the completion of
action items under Priority Area 1, 2 and 3.
Handling Overflight Traffic within Kota Kinabalu FIR (WP07)
4.15. Malaysia presented the challenges faced by Kota Kinabalu ACC in managing traffic,
which require transition of flight level to the meet the FLAS of particular routes before handing over to
the next ACC. As an example, westbound traffic operating on ATS route M522/M754 that entered
Kota Kinabalu FIR at waypoint VINIK would be transferred by Manila ACC at an odd level (FLAS:
FL290/FL330/FL370). Kota Kinabalu ACC would then need to manage the same aircraft, either to
climb or descend, to meet the FLAS at waypoint MAMOK (FL320/FL360/FL400) before handing over
to Ujung Pandang ACC. Figure 4 illustrates the current FLAS arrangement within Kota Kinabalu FIR.
Figure 4. FLAS for Kota Kinabalu FIR
8
SCSTFRG/7
4.16. With the confluence of 12 ATS routes at VJN (Kota Kinabalu DVOR/DME), and an
average of 42% of overflight traffic (1120 overflight traffic per week) requires transition of flight level,
Malaysia proposed for a holistic review of the South China Sea Modified Single Alternate FLOS and
FLAS. This would reduce the ATC workload, safety risk and LHD occurrences in Kota Kinabalu FIR.
4.17. The meeting noted the presentation and would resolve this together with Priority Area 4.
Agenda Item 5: Review and Update of the Task List of SCSTFRG
SCSTFRG Task List (WP08)
5.1. The SCSTFRG Task List as reviewed by the meeting is provided in Appendix F.
Agenda Item 6: Decisions/Recommendations to SEACG
6.1. Decision 1: The meeting agreed for the review of existing FLAS/FLOS operating within
the South China Sea with a view to enhancing efficiencies to be accorded as Priority Area 4 of the
SCSTFRG. Discussion on this Priority Area 4 would take place after the completion of action items
under Priority Area 1, 2 and 3.
6.2. Decision 2: The meeting agreed for SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 11,
M768 to be considered being removed from SEACG Task List. SCSTFRG would concentrate on the
reduction of longitudinal spacing on ATS route M768 from 80NM to 50NM based on RNP 10 with the
possibility of reducing it further to 30NM in the future.
6.3. Decision 3: The meeting agreed for SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal 14
and 15, M771 and L642 to be considered being removed from SEACG Task List, and to concentrate
on route proposals SCS01 and SCS02 of the Asia/Pacific Region ATS Route Catalogue.
Agenda Item 7: Any Other Business
Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Airspace Design Workshop (IP02)
7.1. ICAO provided information about the PBN Airspace Design Workshop, which would be
conducted at ICAO Asia and Pacific Regional Sub-Office, Beijing, China, from 21 to 25 January 2019.
The objective of this workshop is to provide a thorough understanding of airspace design requirements;
focusing on PBN based solutions to ensure an efficient, flexible and dynamic airspace structure that
meets Stakeholders requirements in terms of safety, flight efficiency and capacity in a cost-effective
manner. States/Administration interested to participate in this workshop should complete the
Registration Form and send to the ICAO Asia and Pacific Regional Sub-Office no later than 7 January
2019.
Space Based ADS-B and Flow Management (IP06)
7.2. Aireon provided updates on the development and demonstration of the spaced based ADS-
B. It was noted that space based ADS-B could be one of the solution to fill the surveillance gaps within
the South China Sea.
9
SCSTFRG/7
Date and Venue of the Next Meeting
The next SCSTFRG meeting would be tentatively held in March 2019 at a location to be determined.
States/Administration considering hosting the SCSTFRG/8 were invited to contact the Secretariat.
Closing of the Meeting
The Chairman thanked the participants for their fruitful contributions at the meeting. However, it was
noted that the absence of some member States of this review group had slowed down the progress.
The Chairman would like to reiterate the importance of every member State of this group to be
represented appropriately at every meeting such that pressing issues in the group could be resolved
timely and effectively.
The Chairman congratulated all the participants for the successful completion of the meeting.
10
SCSTFRG/7
Appendix A to the Report
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
Name Title/Organization Tel/Fax/E-mail

1. HONG KONG CHINA (2)
1. Mr. Au Yeung Hung Leung, Tommy Senior Safety and Quality Officer (En-route) Tel. : +85 2 2910 6448
Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Fax : +85 2 2910 0186
Air Traffic Management Division Email: thlauyeung@cad.gov.hk
Civil Aviation Department Headquarters
1 Tung Fai Road
Hong Kong International Airport, Lantau
HONG KONG, CHINA
2. Ms. Mak Yuet Yan Annie Evaluation Officer Tel. : +85 2 2910 6502
Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Fax : +85 2 2910 1655
Air Traffic Management Division Email: ayymak@cad.gov.hk
Civil Aviation Department Headquarters
1 Tung Fai Road
HONG KONG, CHINA
2. INDONESIA (5)
3. Mr. Elfi Amir Director of Air Navigation Tel. : +62 821 6818 7755
DGCA Indonesia Fax :
Direktorat Navigasi Penerbangan Email: tevimc@yahoo.com
Sainath Tower Lantai 12, Jalan Selangit Blok B No.9
Kemayoran, Jakarta Pusat
INDONESIA
A-1
SCSTFRG/7

4. Mr. Nur Sa’id Eko Nughoro Air Navigation Inspector & ATM Officer Tel. : +62 813 25469339
DGCA Indonesia Fax :
Direktorat Navigasi Penerbangan Email: ecko.atc@gmail.com
Sainath Tower Lantai 12, Jalan Selangit Blok B No.9
Kemayoran, Jakarta Pusat
INDONESIA
5. Mr. Ahmad Setiawan Junior Manager Planning & Evaluation Upper South Sumatera Tel. : +62 817 4805 236
AirNav Indonesia Fax : +62 21 550 6122
ACC Division JATSC Email: ahmad_setiawan@rocketmail.co
Building #611 / ATS Tower m
Soekarno-Hatta International Airport
Tangerang – Banten
INDONESIA 15126
6. Mr. Eko Arifianto First ATC Tel. : +62 411 481 3210
AirNav Indonesia +62 821 9429 1805
MATSC Building Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport Fax :
Makassar Email: eko_rossifumi@rocketmail.com
INDONESIA
3. MALAYSIA (3)
7. Mr. Jamil Khir Bin Mohamed Director of Kuala Lumpur Air Traffic Control Centre Tel. : +60 3 7846 5233 ext.200
Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia Fax : +60 3 7845 6590
Pusat Kawalan Trafik Udara Email: jamilkhir@caam.gov.my
Blok A, Kompleks Kawalan Trafik Udara
Lapangan Terbang Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah
47200 Subang, Selangor
MALAYSIA
A-2
SCSTFRG/7

8. Mr. Nasuruddin Bin Zainol Abidin Deputy Director Tel. : +60 3 8871 4210
Air Traffic Management Sector Email: nasuruddin@caam.gov.my
Aras 4, Blok Podium B, Presint 4
No. 27 Persiaran Perdana
62618 Putrajaya
MALAYSIA
9. Mr. Mohd Salihin Bin Yahya Principal Assistant Director Tel. : +60 88 224 404
Beg Berkunci 2065 Email: salihin@caam.gov.my
Jalan Bunga Raya
88618 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah
MALAYSIA
4. PHILIPPINES (8)
10. Mr. Michael E. Mapanao Assistant Director General I, ATS Tel. : +63 2 944 2218
Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Fax :
Air Traffic Service Email: mikeecho9015@yahoo.com
NAIA Road, Pasay City, 1300
PHILIPPINES
11. Mr. Ferdinand A. Tienzo Division Chief Tel. : +63 2 944 2215
Air Traffic Service Email: tienzoda@outlook.com
PHILIPPINES
A-3
SCSTFRG/7

12. Ms. Melba S. Acurantes Facility Chief Tel. : +63 2 944 2245
Airways Facilities Complex Email: ms_acurantes@yahoo.com
Manila Area Control Centre
PHILIPPINES
13. Mr. Edgardo I. Estrivo Air Traffic Management Officer V Tel. : +63 2 944 2237
Airways Facilities Complex Email: strivenoy_28@yahoo.com
PHILIPPINES
14. Mr. Joseph Tyrone R. Arias Air Traffic Management Officer IV Tel. : +63 2 944 2237
Airways Facilities Complex Email: jtrakx06@gmail.com
PHILIPPINES
15. Ms. Zenia U. Paciones Air Traffic Management Officer IV Tel. : +63 2 944 2213
AFPDD Email: zenpaciones@yahoo.com
Air Traffic Service
PHILIPPINES
A-4
SCSTFRG/7

16. Mr. Renato C. Tiu Jr. Air Traffic Management Officer III Tel. : +63 2 944 2237
Airways Facilities Complex Email: renztiujr1@gmail.com
PHILIPPINES
17. Mr. Benjie O. Esber Air Traffic Management Officer III Tel. : +63 2 944 2237
Airways Facilities Complex Email: benjie_esber@yahoo.com
PHILIPPINES
5. SINGAPORE (9)
18. Mr. Jeff LOKE Deputy Chief (Singapore Air Traffic Control Centre) Tel. :
Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax :
Singapore Changi Airport, P.O Box 1 Email: jeff_loke@caas.gov.sg
SINGAPORE 918141
19. Mr. Jermaine HOH ATC Manager Tel. :

Singapore Changi Airport, P.O Box 1 Email: jermaine_hoh@caas.gov.sg
SINGAPORE 918141
20. Mr. Michael SHEE ATC Manager Tel. :

Singapore Changi Airport, P.O Box 1 Email: michael_shee@caas.gov.sg
SINGAPORE 918141
A-5
SCSTFRG/7

21. Mr. Mohamed Idham Bin Idrus ATC Officer Tel. :
Singapore Changi Airport, P.O Box 1 Email: mohd_idham_idrus@caas.gov.s
SINGAPORE 918141 g
22. Mr. LIM Jek Sheng ATC Officer Tel. :

Singapore Changi Airport, P.O Box 1 Email: lim_jek_sheng@caas.gov.sg
SINGAPORE 918141
23. Mr. CHAI Chun Err Deputy Manager (ANS Policy) Tel. :
Singapore Changi Airport, P.O Box 1 Email: chai_chun_err@caas.gov.sg
SINGAPORE 918141
24. Mr. Mohamed Faisal Bin Mohamed Programme Director, Senior Research Fellow Tel. : +65 6908 3406
Salleh Nanyang Technological University Fax : +65 6792 4062
Air Traffic Management Research Institute Email: mohd.faisal@ntu.edu.sg
65 Nanyang Drive, North Spine, Block N3.2-B3M-10,
SINGAPORE 637460
25. Ms. Shafirah Aneeka Project Lead Tel. : +65 6908 1475
Nanyang Technological University Fax : +65 6792 4062
Air Traffic Management Research Institute Email: ashafirah@ntu.edu.sg
65 Nanyang Drive, North Spine, Block N3.2-B3M-10,
SINGAPORE 637460
26. Mr. Andrew YEO Ann Kheng Operations Advisor Tel. : +65 6585 6275
Nanyang Technological University Fax :
Air Traffic Management Research Institute Email: yakheng@yahoo.com.sg
Blk 186 Pasir Ris #03-82 Street 11
SINGAPORE 510186
A-6
SCSTFRG/7
6. THAILAND (3)
27. Mr. Suvichan Sathitkitpichet Director Tel. :
Aeronautical Radio of Thailand Limited (AEROTHAI) Fax :
Network Operations Air Traffic Management Center Email: suvichan.st@aerothai.co.th
102 Ngamduplee Tungmahamek Sathon
Bangkok 10120
THAILAND
28. Mr. Thongchai Jamphatippong Chief of Operational Administration Tel. :

Bangkok Area Control Center Email: thongchai.ja@aerothai.co.th
Bangkok 10120
THAILAND
29. Mr. Dolsarit Somseang System Engineer Tel. :

Safety Management System Email: dolsarit.so@aerothai.co.th
Bangkok 10120
THAILAND
7. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA* (1)

30. Mr. Michael Watkins Senior Air Traffic Representative, Asia Pacific Tel. : +011 65 6476 9462
Federal Aviation Administration Fax :
FAA c/o American Embassy Email: michael.w.watkins@faa.gov
27 Napier Rd, Singapore INTL 258508
SINGAPORE
A-7
SCSTFRG/7
8. IATA (2)
31. Mr. David Rollo Assistant Director Tel. : +65 6499 2253
Safety and Flight Operations – ASPAC Fax :
International Air Transport Association Email: rollod@iata.org
80 Pasir Panjang Road
#20-81 Mapletree Business City
SINGAPORE 117372
32. Mr. Owen Dell Head of International Affairs – Operations & Industry Affairs Tel. : +85 2 2747 8829
IATA/Cathay Pacific Fax : +85 2 2141 3818
International Affairs Department Email: owen_dell@cathaypacific.com
9/F Central Tower, Cathay Pacific
HONG KONG, CHINA
9. ICCAIA* (1)
33. Mr. Ken Mclean Regional Director AIREON Tel. : +61 4163 55292
1750 Tysons Blvd Suite 1150 Mclean VA Fax :
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Email: Ken.mclean@aireon.com
10. IFATCA (1)

34. Mr. John Wagstaff Asia-Pacific Representative Tel. : +85 2 9034 1561
IFATCA Fax : +85 2 2910 0186
C/O ATMD, CAD HQ Building, Email: john.wags@gmail.com
1 Tung Fai Road,
HONG KONG, CHINA
A-8
SCSTFRG/7
11. ICAO (2)

35. Mr. Yan Yonggang Regional Officer-ATM (AOM-FUA) Tel. : +86 10 6455 7175
Regional Sub-Office APAC Fax : +86 10 6455 7164
1st Floor, Section C, China Service Mansion Email: yanyg@icao.int
No.9 Erwei Road, Shunyi District
Beijing 100621
CHINA
36. Mr. Mior Adli Bin Mior Sallehhuddin Regional Officer-ATM (AOM-ASM) Tel. : +86 10 6455 7167
Regional Sub-Office APAC Fax : +86 10 6455 7164
1st Floor, Section C, China Service Mansion Email: msallehhuddin@icao.int
No.9 Erwei Road, Shunyi District
Beijing 100621
CHINA
* Observer
A-9
SCSTFRG/7
Appendix B to the Report
LIST OF WORKING AND INFORMATION PAPERS
WORKING PAPERS
PRESENTED
NUMBER AGENDA WORKING PAPERS
BY
WP01 1 Provisional Agenda Secretariat
WP02 2 Review of the South China Sea Operational Concept Secretariat
WP03 4 Asia/Pacific Region ATS Route Catalogue Secretariat

Southeast Asia Route Review Implementation Plan
WP04 4 Secretariat
Proposals
WP05 3 Optimisation of ATS Routes M771 and L642 Singapore
WP06 4 Review of South China Sea FLOS IFATCA
Handling Overflight Traffic within Kota Kinabalu
WP07 4 Malaysia
FIR
WP08 5 SCSTFRG Task List Secretariat
Enhancement of Horizontal Separation on ATS
WP09 2,5 Indonesia
Route M768
INFORMATION PAPERS
PRESENTED
NUMBER AGENDA INFORMATION PAPERS
BY
IP01 - List of Working and Information Papers Secretariat
Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Airspace
IP02 7 Secretariat
Design Workshop
Information Updates to the New Philippine ATM
IP03 2,5 Philippines
Center
ADS-C/CPDLC Planned Implementation in Manila
IP04 2 Philippines
FIR
IP05 2 Ujung Pandang ACC Re-Sectorisation Programme Indonesia
IP06 7 Space Based ADS-B and Flow Management ICCAIA
Updated WPAC/SCS 2017 Traffic Sample Data
IP07 3 MAAR
Visualisation
Initiatives to Optimize Airspace Capacity in Hong Hong Kong
IP08 2
Kong FIR China
B-1
SCSTFRG/7
Appendix B to the Report
PRESENTATIONS
PRESENTED
NUMBER AGENDA PRESENTATIONS
BY
SP01 4 Review of South China Sea FLOS IFATCA
Handling Overflight Traffic within Kota Kinabalu
SP02 4 Malaysia
FIR
SP03 7 Space Based ADS-B and Flow Management ICCAIA
B-2
SCSTFRG/7
Appendix C to the Report
AGENDA
Agenda Item 1: Adoption of Agenda
Agenda Item 2: Review of the Current and Planned CNS/ATM Capabilities and Identifying
Associated Reduced Horizontal Separation
Agenda Item 3: Review of the Existing TF Route Structures in SCS Airspace and Identifying
Priorities
Agenda Item 4: Discussion on PBN Routes Development and FLAS/FLOS Optimization
Agenda Item 5: Review and Update of the Task List of SCSTFRG
Agenda Item 6: Decisions/Recommendations to SEACG
Agenda Item 7: Any Other Business
C-1
SCSTFRG/7
Appendix D to the Report
SIDE MEETING BETWEEN INDONESIA, MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE ON THE

IMPLEMENTATION OF RNP 10 OPERATIONS ON ATS ROUTE M768
Based on the side meeting discussion between Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, it was agreed for a
phased approach for the implementation of RNP 10 operations on ATS route M768. Singapore agreed
to be the lead for the initiative and would also coordinate with Cambodia and Viet Nam.
Date Event/Action
Dec 2018 Confirm with Cambodia and Viet Nam on participation in initiative/trial.
Finalise and confirm AIP Supplement relevant to the trial to inform the aviation
Jan 2019
community of the trial.
Issue AIP Supplement relevant to the trial to inform the aviation community of the
Feb 2019
trial.
Mar 2019 Commencement of one month trial.
Apr 2019 End of trial and gather feedback of one month trial.
May 2019 Agree on date to implement RNP 10 operations on ATS route M768.
Finalise and issue AIP Supplement to implement RNP10 operations on ATS route
Jun 2019
M768.
Jul 2019 Implementation of RNP10 operations on ATS route M768.
D-1
SCSTFRG/7
Appendix E to the Report
SIDE MEETING BETWEEN HONG KONG CHINA, INDONESIA AND PHILIPPINES ON

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 50NM LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION BASED ON RNP 10
Based on the side meeting discussion between Hong Kong China, Indonesia and Philippines, it was
agreed that the implementation of 50NM longitudinal separation, based on RNP 10, would be applied
based on the following timelines:
ESTIMATED
FIR ATS ROUTE CONDITIONS
IMPLEMENTATION
Hong Kong - Manila A461 D + 6 months 1. One overflight and
A583 D + 9 months one arrival to
Manila FIR or Hong
Kong FIR (no speed
restriction).
2. Two overflights
Manila FIR or Hong
Kong FIR (same
speed or increasing
separation).
SABNO A583
requires ADS-
C/CPDLC equipage.
Ujung Pandang - Manila A461, B472, R590, D + 9 months ADS-C/CPDLC

B473, G578, B462 equipage for B462
BIDOR.
 Implementation of AIDC between Manila and Hong Kong:

D + 4 – 5 months
Note: “D” means the day Manila ACC has transferred to the new ATM Center, which is expected to be
on 15 November 2018.
E-1
SCSTFRG/7
Appendix F to the Report
SCSTFRG TASK LIST
ACTION TIME RESPONSIBE

DESCRIPTION STATUS REMARKS
ITEM FRAME PARTY
1/3 Traffic Flow Analysis Update. SCSTFRG/7 Thailand/MAAR Ongoing
2/3 Coordination of activities involving A1:
a) Application of 20NM longitudinal Progress China, Hong Kong Ongoing SCSTFRG/5 – China reported their considerations on
spacing. report to China, Laos, Open risk analysis and suggestions on implementation
SCSTFRG/7 Thailand, phases of reducing longitudinal spacing on A1 and
SCSTFRG/8 Singapore and Viet A202 (WP06).
Nam SCSTFRG/6 – Further discussion between China,
Hong Kong China, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam is
required in order to set a workable timeline for this
matter. It was proposed for States to have side
meeting during the coming SEACG/25 in Cambodia.
SCSTFRG/7 – Hong Kong China and Taipei ACCs
would implement 20NM longitudinal spacing at
ELATO and ENVAR (with condition as prescribed in
SCSTFRG/7 report) in January 2019. Hong Kong
China would engage bilateral discussion with China to
discuss this matter.
b) Parallel routes. China, Hong Kong Open SCSTFRG/6 – It was agreed that discussion related to
China, Laos, the establishment of parallel route to A1 should take
Thailand, Viet Nam place after the successful implementation of reduce
longitudinal spacing from 30NM to 20NM on A1.
c) Coordination on the operation near FIR China, Hong Kong Open
boundary. China, Viet Nam
d) Direct communication link between Da China, Viet Nam Open
Nang APP and Sanya ACC.
e) AIDC between Sanya ACC, Ho Chi Minh China, Viet Nam Open
ACC, Hai Noi ACC.
f) Modelling and simulation of A1 Parallel
Routes.
F-1
SCSTFRG/7

ITEM FRAME PARTY
4/3 Update on results of Manila ACC ADS- SCSTFRG/7 Philippines Open SCSTFRG5 – Philippines updated the progress. The
C/CPDLC Trials. First quarter trial operation would continue until the end of 2017.
of 2019 SCSTFRG/6 – No update on this matter due to
unavailability of Philippines’ representative during
this meeting. ICAO to write to Philippines requesting
for updates on this matter.
SCSTFRG/7 – Planned to be in operation in first
quarter of 2019 for West Pacific Airspace and second
quarter of 2019 for South China Sea Area.
6/3 Application of reduced longitudinal spacing in ASAP States/Sub- Open Harmonised surveillance based separation standards
areas with Surveillance and VHF DCPC. Regional that can be applied on SCS Routes that pass through
Coordination category ‘S’ airspace needs to be identified and
Groups applied in the near term.
1/4 Optimisation of L642/M771 Routes:
a) Modelling of Scenario. Progress China, Hong Kong Open SCSTFRG/4 – WP06 and WP12.
report to China, Malaysia, SCSTFRG/5 – ATMRI conducted preliminary
SCSTFRG/7 Singapore, and simulation and analysis on WSSS arrivals via L642
SCSTFRG/8 Viet Nam and direct route between Kuala Lumpur and Hong
Kong (WP06).
SCSTFRG/7 – ATMRI would conduct modelling and
simulation to facilitate the analysis of the proposed
implementation of two additional parallel routes for
L642 and M771.
b) Tele-Conference to discuss outcomes. IATA Closed SCSTFRG/6 – further discussion between China,
Hong Kong China, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam is
Outcomes were discussed at the SCSTFRG/5.
F-2
SCSTFRG/7

ITEM FRAME PARTY
2/4 Application of reduced longitudinal spacing on First half of Malaysia, and Open SCSTFRG/4 – WP06 and IP03.
M758/M761. 2020 Singapore SCSTFRG/6 – Bilateral discussion between Malaysia
and Singapore is ongoing. Reduction of longitudinal
spacing from 80NM to 40NM was targeted for first
half of 2020.
3/4 Optimising traffic flow between Hong Kong and Progress Hong Kong China, Open Dependent on surveillance and communication
Manila FIR. report to Indonesia, upgrade in Manila FIR.
SCSTFRG/7 Philippines, and SCSTFRG/6 – No update on this matter due to
SCSTFRG/8 IATA unavailability of representatives from Hong Kong
China and Philippines. ICAO to write to Hong Kong
China and Philippines requesting for updates on this
matter and the timelines for the upgrading of current
conventional routes to RNP10.
SCSTFRG/7 – Hong Kong China and Philippines
agreed to reduce the longitudinal spacing from 80NM
to 50NM on ATS route A461 and A583. Philippines
would lead the coordination between Hong Kong
China, Indonesia and Philippines.
4/4 New ATS Routes parallel to R208. Progress Malaysia, Open SCSTFRG/4 – WP11.
report to Singapore, and SCSTFRG/5 – ATMRI conducted preliminary
SCSTFRG/7 Viet Nam simulation and analysis on new routes parallel to
SCSTFRG/8 R208.
SCSTFRG/6 – Singapore and Viet Nam to discuss
further during their next bilateral meeting.
SCSTFRG/7 – To be discussed at tri-lateral meeting
between Malaysia, Singapore and Viet Nam.
6/4 Implementation of parallel routes along M751 Progress Malaysia, and Open SCSTFRG/4 – WP13.
within Kuala Lumpur FIR and M644 within report to Thailand SCSTFRG/6 – Malaysia is currently finalising the
Bangkok FIR. SCSTFRG/7 details of the parallel route. PfA BANP to be sent to
SCSTFRG/8 ICAO in due time.
SCSTFRG/7 – PfA BANP was submitted to ICAO
APAC Regional Office in June 2018.
F-3
SCSTFRG/7

ITEM FRAME PARTY
7/4 Optimising routing into China to allow more China, Hong Kong Open Discussion regarding this matter will only take place
options for aircraft going beyond Pearl River China, Laos, after the completion of the 3 priority areas agreed in
Delta. Thailand, Viet SCSTFRG/3.
Nam, and IATA
1/5 Study application of 20NM longitudinal spacing Progress China, Hong Kong Open SCSTFRG/5 – Mekong States already applying 20NM
on A202. report to China. longitudinal spacing in their FIRs (WP05).
SCSTFRG/7 SCSTFRG/6 – Further discussion between China,
SCSTFRG/8 Hong Kong China, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam is
2/5 Study reduction of longitudinal spacing on Progress China, Hong Kong Open SCSTFRG/6 – Further discussion between China,
M771/L642. report to China, Malaysia, Hong Kong China, Malaysia, Singapore and Viet Nam
SCSTFRG/7 Singapore, Viet is required in order to set a workable timeline for this
SCSTFRG/8 Nam, and IATA matter. It was proposed for States to have side
Singapore and Viet Nam had implemented 20NM
longitudinal spacing within their FIRs.
F-4
SCSTFRG/7

ITEM FRAME PARTY
3/5 Review of FLAS/FLOS:
a) Review the FLAS/FLOS Chart and give Progress All Member States Open SCSTFRG/5 – WP02.
feedback and optimisation suggestion to report to SCSTFRG/7 – The meeting agreed for the review of
RSO. SCSTFRG/7 existing FLAS/FLOS operating within the South
China Sea with a view to enhancing efficiencies, to be
accorded as Priority Area 4 of the SCSTFRG.
b) Review the FLAS between Manila and Progress All Member States Open SCSTFRG/5 – WP01.
Ujung Pandang ACCs. report to SCSTFRG/6 – No update on this matter due to
SCSTFRG/7 unavailability of Philippines’ representative during
this meeting. ICAO to write to Philippines requesting
for updates on this matter.
SCSTFRG/7 – The meeting agreed for the review of
existing FLAS/FLOS operating within the South
China Sea with a view to enhancing efficiencies, to be
accorded as Priority Area 4 of the SCSTFRG.
c) The US update their analysis of Closed
FLAS/FLOS.
4/5 Recommend SEACG to review and incorporate By Malaysia, and RSO Closed SCSTFRG/5 – WP03. Had been included in Version
new route requirements proposed by Malaysia SEACG/25 ICAO 17 of the APAC Region ATS Route Catalogue.
into APAC Route Catalogue.
F-5
SCSTFRG/7

ITEM FRAME PARTY
5/5 SCS communication and surveillance chart SCSTFRG/6 Thailand/MAAR/ Closed SCSTFRG/5 – Actual coverage charts is preferred.
update. States SCSTFRG/6 – MAAR highlighted the difficulties in
getting actual coverage from the relevant States. As of
now, only theoretical coverage charts are available.
Conclusion APANPIRG/29/22 – States/
Administrations be urged to respond to regular survey
on Surveillance and Direct Control and Pilot
Communication (DCPC) VHF Coverage to be
circulated through an ICAO State Letter and advise
the Point of Contact. Hong Kong China and Thailand
volunteered to produce the first version of the ATS
Surveillance and DCPC VHF coverage charts by end
April 2019 and expected to be endorsed by the CNS
Sub-group and its contributory bodies by end July
2019. CNS Sub-group and its contributory bodies will
regularly review and update to the coverage charts in
its future meetings.
1/6 FL390 that is currently a FLAS level on ATS Progress China, Hong Kong Open SCSTFRG/5 – WP02 conclusion.
route A1 to be assigned to ATS route Q1/Q2. during China, Thailand, SCSTFRG/6 – Should take place simultaneously with
SCSTFRG/7 and Viet Nam the implementation of reduce longitudinal spacing
from 30NM to 20NM on A1.
2/6 To reduce separation on M768 to 50NM using Progress Indonesia, Open SCSTFRG/6 – IP04.
ADS-C/CPDLC. report to Malaysia, SCSTFRG/7 – Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and
SCSTFRG/7 Singapore, and Viet Thailand agreed to this proposal. Due to the absence
SCSTFRG/8 Nam of Cambodia and Viet Nam, offline discussion lead by
Singapore would be carried-out.
7/1 SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal SCSTFRG/8 Singapore, Viet Open As Viet Nam was absence at SCSTFRG/7, this item
5, M756 TSN-ENREP or Nam would be reviewed at SCSTFRG/8 or SEACG/26,
SEACG/26 depending on which meeting would take place earlier.
F-6
SCSTFRG/7

ITEM FRAME PARTY
7/2 SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal SCSTFRG/8 Cambodia, Open As Viet Nam was absence at SCSTFRG/7, this item
10, L628 or Philippines, would be discussed at SCSTFRG/8 or SEACG/26,
SEACG/26 Thailand, Viet Nam depending on which meeting would take place earlier.
7/3 SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal SEACG/26 Cambodia, Open SCSTFRG/7 agreed for this action item to be
11, M768 Indonesia, considered being removed from SEACG Task List. To
Malaysia, concentrate on reduction of longitudinal spacing on
Singapore, ATS route M768 from 80NM to 50NM based on RNP
Thailand, Viet Nam 10 with the possibility of reducing it further to 30NM
in the future.
7/5 SEA Route Review Implementation Plan Proposal SEACG/26 China, Hong Kong Open SCSTFRG/7 agreed for this action item to be
14 and 15, M771 and L642 China, Viet Nam considered being removed from SEACG Task List. To
concentrate on route proposal SCS01 and SCS02 of
the Asia/Pacific Region ATS Route Catalogue.
F-7

SAR

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

SAR

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION

MANILA, PHILIPPINES, 05 – 07 NOVEMBER 2018

The views expressed in this Report should be taken as those of the

Approved by the Meeting

Officers and Regional Sub-Office i

Opening of the Meeting i

Documentation and Working Language i

REPORT ON AGENDA ITEMS

Agenda Item 1: Adoption of Agenda 1

Agenda Item 6: Decisions/Recommendations to SEACG 9

Agenda Item 7: Any Other Business 9

Date and Venue of the Next Meeting 10

Closing of the Meeting 10

Appendix A: List of Participants A-1

Appendix B: List of Working and Information Papers B-1

Appendix C: Meeting Agenda C-1

Appendix D: Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore Side Meeting Summary D-1

Appendix F: SCSTFRG Task List F-1

2.1. The meeting was attended by 36 participants, from 7 States/Administration and 4

2.2. A list of participants is appended at Appendix A to this report.

Officers & Regional Sub-Office

Opening of the Meeting

Documentation and Working Language

5.2. A list of papers is appended at Appendix B to this report.

REPORT ON AGENDA ITEMS

Agenda Item 1: Adoption of Agenda (WP01)

Review of the South China Sea Operational Concept (WP02)

Enhancement of Horizontal Separation on ATS Route M768 (WP09)

Information Updates to the New Philippine ATM Center (IP03)

ADS-C/CPDLC Planned Implementation in Manila FIR (IP04)

Figure 1. Manila ACC planned ADS-C/CPDLC operation areas

Ujung Pandang ACC Re-Sectorisation Programme (IP05)

Initiatives to Optimize Airspace Capacity in Hong Kong FIR (IP08)

Optimisation of ATS Routes M771 and L642 (WP05)

Figure 2. Proposed parallel routes to L642 and M771

Updated WPAC/SCS 2017 Traffic Sample Data Visualisation (IP07)

Agenda Item 4: Discussion on PBN Routes Development and FLAS/FLOS Optimization

Asia/Pacific Region ATS Route Catalogue (WP03)

Southeast Asia Route Review Implementation Plan Proposals (WP04)

Review of South China Sea FLOS (WP06)

a) Phase 1: Revision of FLAS on selected ATS routes.

b) Phase 2: Revision of FLOS on selected ATS routes.

Handling Overflight Traffic within Kota Kinabalu FIR (WP07)

Figure 4. FLAS for Kota Kinabalu FIR

Agenda Item 5: Review and Update of the Task List of SCSTFRG

SCSTFRG Task List (WP08)

Agenda Item 6: Decisions/Recommendations to SEACG

Agenda Item 7: Any Other Business

Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Airspace Design Workshop (IP02)

Space Based ADS-B and Flow Management (IP06)

Date and Venue of the Next Meeting

Closing of the Meeting

Name Title/Organization Tel/Fax/E-mail

Name Title/Organization Tel/Fax/E-mail

Name Title/Organization Tel/Fax/E-mail

Name Title/Organization Tel/Fax/E-mail

Name Title/Organization Tel/Fax/E-mail

19. Mr. Jermaine HOH ATC Manager Tel. :

20. Mr. Michael SHEE ATC Manager Tel. :

Name Title/Organization Tel/Fax/E-mail

22. Mr. LIM Jek Sheng ATC Officer Tel. :

Name Title/Organization Tel/Fax/E-mail

28. Mr. Thongchai Jamphatippong Chief of Operational Administration Tel. :