Program Evaluation Analysis Sample Computation

PROGRAM EVALUATION ANALYSIS
Trainee 1 Trainee 2
A. Program Design and Organization

1. Clarity of program objectives 4 3
2. Organization of course activities 4 3
3. Scheduling of activities and time allotment 3 1
4. Attinment of program objectives 4 2
B. Course Content
1. Course content vis-à-vis the program objectives 4 3
2. Sequencing of the course contents 4 3
3. Sufficiency of information 4 3
4. Relevance of course content vis-à-vis need 4 3
C. Training Methodology
1. Effectiveness of selected method 4 3
2. Appropriateness to the course activities 4 3
D. Program Administration and Management

1. Adequacy of provided supplies and materials 4 3
2. Timeliness of provision of supplies and materials 4 3
3. Availability of training equipment and materials 4 3
4. Conduciveness of the training venue to learning 4 4
5. Appropriateness of the physical layout of the venue 3 3
6. Overall accommodation 4 3
7. Secretariat service 4 2
4
E. Facilitator/Trainer (Redilyn C. Agub)
1. Knowledge of the subject matter 4 4
2. Ability to communicate ideas 4 4
3. Ability to arouse interest 4 4
4. Ability to encourage participation 4 4
5. Ability to organise lecture 4 4
6. Ability to answer questions 4 4
7. Openness to suggestions and comments 4 4
8. Ability to encourage critical and/or creative thinking 4 4
9. Spontaneity in expression of ideas 4 4
10. Use of training equipment 4 4
11. Comprehensiveness of lecture 4 4
12. Ability to provide adequate feedback 4 4
13. Ability to provide practical exercises 4 4
Facilitator/Trainer (Alfonso P. Francisco)

Facilitator/Trainer (Andres F. Cabalu)

Facilitator/Trainer (Gervacio Faustino)

Average for t
Prepared by:
KATHRINE RAMOS - ANGELES

Sr. TESD Specialist
TESDA PTC Malolos
Trainee 3 Trainee 4 Trainee 5 Average Descriptive Rating
4 5 5 4.20 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

3 5 3 3.00 Good / Adequate
3.75 Very Good / Very Satisfactory



5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory
5 4 4.25 Very Good

5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
5 4 4.25 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good

4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good

4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good

4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
4 4.00 Very Good
Average for the whole evaluation: 4.02 Very Good / Very Satisfactory
Average
Descriptive Rating per Group
per Group
The item on "Program Design and
In this area, the item on "Scheduling of activities and Organization" got an average
time allotment" got a rating of 3.75 or "Very Good/Very rating of 3.75 or "Very Good/Very
Satisfactory" while the rest were rated "Good / Adequate". Satisfactory".

The area on "Course Content"
All items under the Course Content got ratings falling on got an average rating of 4.00
"Very Good/Very Satisfactory". This means that the or "Very Good/Very
trainees were very satisfied with the course content. Satisfactory".
3.90 Very Good / Very Satisfactory The item on "Training

On the "effectiveness of selected method", a 4.00 rating was given or
Methodology" got an average
"Very Good/Very satisfactory" while the "Appropriateness to the course rating of 3.90 or "Very Good/Very
activities" got 3.80 or "Very Good/Very Satisfactory". Satisfactory".
The item on "Program

Administration and
The adequacy and timeliness of provision of Management" got an average
supplies and materials got an average of 3.91 or rating of 3.91 or "Very
"Very Good/Very Satisfactory" Good/Very Satisfactory".
4.25 Very Good
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Redilyn
The whole items got and average rating of 4.25 C. Agub)" got an average
which is equivalent to "Very Good" rating of 4.25 or "Very Good"".
4.00 Very Good
The item on "

Facilitator/Trainer (Alfonso P.
All items got a rating of 4.00 or "Very good" Francisco)" got an average
rating of 4.00 or "Very Good".
4.00 Very Good
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Andres F.
All Items got a rating of 4.00 or "Very Good" Cabalu)" got an average rating
of 4.0 or "Very Good".
4.00 Very Good
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Gervacio
All the items got and average rating of 4.00 or "Very Faustino)" got an average
Good" respectively. rating of 4.00 or "Very Good".
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Gervacio
All the items got and average rating of 4.00 or "Very Faustino)" got an average
Good" respectively. rating of 4.00 or "Very Good".
As a whole, the rating given to the program is 4.23 or

"Very Good/Very Satisfactory".
1 Poor / Unsatisfactory
1.01 Poor / Unsatisfactory
1.5 Fair / Satisfactory
2 Fair / Satisfactory
2.5 Good / Adequate
2.51 Good / Adequate
2.6 Good / Adequate
2.7 Good / Adequate
2.8 Good / Adequate
2.9 Good / Adequate
3 Good / Adequate
3.1 Good / Adequate
3.2 Good / Adequate
3.3 Good / Adequate
3.4 Good / Adequate
4 Very Good / Very Satisfactory
4.5 Outstanding
4.51 Outstanding
4.52 Outstanding
4.53 Outstanding
4.54 Outstanding
4.55 Outstanding
4.56 Outstanding
4.57 Outstanding
4.58 Outstanding
4.59 Outstanding
4.6 Outstanding
4.61 Outstanding
4.62 Outstanding
4.63 Outstanding
4.64 Outstanding
4.65 Outstanding
4.66 Outstanding
4.67 Outstanding
4.68 Outstanding
4.69 Outstanding
4.7 Outstanding
4.71 Outstanding
4.72 Outstanding
4.73 Outstanding
4.74 Outstanding
4.75 Outstanding
4.76 Outstanding
4.77 Outstanding
4.78 Outstanding
4.79 Outstanding
4.8 Outstanding
4.81 Outstanding
4.82 Outstanding
4.83 Outstanding
4.84 Outstanding
4.85 Outstanding
4.86 Outstanding
4.87 Outstanding
4.88 Outstanding
4.89 Outstanding
4.9 Outstanding
4.91 Outstanding
4.92 Outstanding
4.93 Outstanding
4.94 Outstanding
4.95 Outstanding
4.96 Outstanding
4.97 Outstanding
4.98 Outstanding
4.99 Outstanding
5 Outstanding
1 Poor
1.01 Poor
1.02 Poor
1.03 Poor
1.04 Poor
1.05 Poor
1.06 Poor
1.07 Poor
1.08 Poor
1.09 Poor
1.1 Poor
1.11 Poor
1.12 Poor
1.13 Poor
1.14 Poor
1.15 Poor
1.16 Poor
1.17 Poor
1.18 Poor
1.19 Poor
1.2 Poor
1.21 Poor
1.22 Poor
1.23 Poor
1.24 Poor
1.25 Poor
1.26 Poor
1.27 Poor
1.28 Poor
1.29 Poor
1.3 Poor
1.31 Poor
1.32 Poor
1.33 Poor
1.34 Poor
1.35 Poor
1.36 Poor
1.37 Poor
1.38 Poor
1.39 Poor
1.4 Poor
1.41 Poor
1.42 Poor
1.43 Poor
1.44 Poor
1.45 Poor
1.46 Poor
1.47 Poor
1.48 Poor
1.49 Poor
1.5 Poor
1.51 Poor
1.52 Poor
1.53 Poor
1.54 Poor
1.55 Poor
1.56 Poor
1.57 Poor
1.58 Poor
1.59 Poor
1.6 Poor
1.61 Poor
1.62 Poor
1.63 Poor
1.64 Poor
1.65 Poor
1.66 Poor
1.67 Poor
1.68 Poor
1.69 Poor
1.7 Poor
1.71 Poor
1.72 Poor
1.73 Poor
1.74 Poor
1.75 Poor
1.76 Poor
1.77 Poor
1.78 Poor
1.79 Poor
1.8 Poor
1.81 Poor
1.82 Poor
1.83 Poor
1.84 Poor
1.85 Poor
1.86 Poor
1.87 Poor
1.88 Poor
1.89 Poor
1.9 Poor
1.91 Poor
1.92 Poor
1.93 Poor
1.94 Poor
1.95 Poor
1.96 Poor
1.97 Poor
1.98 Poor
1.99 Poor
2 Average
2.01 Average
2.02 Average
2.03 Average
2.04 Average
2.05 Average
2.06 Average
2.07 Average
2.08 Average
2.09 Average
2.1 Average
2.11 Average
2.12 Average
2.13 Average
2.14 Average
2.15 Average
2.16 Average
2.17 Average
2.18 Average
2.19 Average
2.2 Average
2.21 Average
2.22 Average
2.23 Average
2.24 Average
2.25 Average
2.26 Average
2.27 Average
2.28 Average
2.29 Average
2.3 Average
2.31 Average
2.32 Average
2.33 Average
2.34 Average
2.35 Average
2.36 Average
2.37 Average
2.38 Average
2.39 Average
2.4 Average
2.41 Average
2.42 Average
2.43 Average
2.44 Average
2.45 Average
2.46 Average
2.47 Average
2.48 Average
2.49 Average
2.5 Average
2.51 Average
2.52 Average
2.53 Average
2.54 Average
2.55 Average
2.56 Average
2.57 Average
2.58 Average
2.59 Average
2.6 Average
2.61 Average
2.62 Average
2.63 Average
2.64 Average
2.65 Average
2.66 Average
2.67 Average
2.68 Average
2.69 Average
2.7 Average
2.71 Average
2.72 Average
2.73 Average
2.74 Average
2.75 Average
2.76 Average
2.77 Average
2.78 Average
2.79 Average
2.8 Average
2.81 Average
2.82 Average
2.83 Average
2.84 Average
2.85 Average
2.86 Average
2.87 Average
2.88 Average
2.89 Average
2.9 Average
2.91 Average
2.92 Average
2.93 Average
2.94 Average
2.95 Average
2.96 Average
2.97 Average
2.98 Average
2.99 Average
3 Good
3.01 Good
3.02 Good
3.03 Good
3.04 Good
3.05 Good
3.06 Good
3.07 Good
3.08 Good
3.09 Good
3.1 Good
3.11 Good
3.12 Good
3.13 Good
3.14 Good
3.15 Good
3.16 Good
3.17 Good
3.18 Good
3.19 Good
3.2 Good
3.21 Good
3.22 Good
3.23 Good
3.24 Good
3.25 Good
3.26 Good
3.27 Good
3.28 Good
3.29 Good
3.3 Good
3.31 Good
3.32 Good
3.33 Good
3.34 Good
3.35 Good
3.36 Good
3.37 Good
3.38 Good
3.39 Good
3.4 Good
3.41 Good
3.42 Good
3.43 Good
3.44 Good
3.45 Good
3.46 Good
3.47 Good
3.48 Good
3.49 Good
3.5 Good
3.51 Good
3.52 Good
3.53 Good
3.54 Good
3.55 Good
3.56 Good
3.57 Good
3.58 Good
3.59 Good
3.6 Good
3.61 Good
3.62 Good
3.63 Good
3.64 Good
3.65 Good
3.66 Good
3.67 Good
3.68 Good
3.69 Good
3.7 Good
3.71 Good
3.72 Good
3.73 Good
3.74 Good
3.75 Good
3.76 Good
3.77 Good
3.78 Good
3.79 Good
3.8 Good
3.81 Good
3.82 Good
3.83 Good
3.84 Good
3.85 Good
3.86 Good
3.87 Good
3.88 Good
3.89 Good
3.9 Good
3.91 Good
3.92 Good
3.93 Good
3.94 Good
3.95 Good
3.96 Good
3.97 Good
3.98 Good
3.99 Good
4 Very Good
4.01 Very Good
4.02 Very Good
4.03 Very Good
4.04 Very Good
4.05 Very Good
4.06 Very Good
4.07 Very Good
4.08 Very Good
4.09 Very Good
4.1 Very Good
4.11 Very Good
4.12 Very Good
4.13 Very Good
4.14 Very Good
4.15 Very Good
4.16 Very Good
4.17 Very Good
4.18 Very Good
4.19 Very Good
4.2 Very Good
4.21 Very Good
4.22 Very Good
4.23 Very Good
4.24 Very Good
4.25 Very Good
4.26 Very Good
4.27 Very Good
4.28 Very Good
4.29 Very Good
4.3 Very Good
4.31 Very Good
4.32 Very Good
4.33 Very Good
4.34 Very Good
4.35 Very Good
4.36 Very Good
4.37 Very Good
4.38 Very Good
4.39 Very Good
4.4 Very Good
4.41 Very Good
4.42 Very Good
4.43 Very Good
4.44 Very Good
4.45 Very Good
4.46 Very Good
4.47 Very Good
4.48 Very Good
4.49 Very Good
4.5 Very Good
4.51 Very Good
4.52 Very Good
4.53 Very Good
4.54 Very Good
4.55 Very Good
4.56 Very Good
4.57 Very Good
4.58 Very Good
4.59 Very Good
4.6 Very Good
4.61 Very Good
4.62 Very Good
4.63 Very Good
4.64 Very Good
4.65 Very Good
4.66 Very Good
4.67 Very Good
4.68 Very Good
4.69 Very Good
4.7 Very Good
4.71 Very Good
4.72 Very Good
4.73 Very Good
4.74 Very Good
4.75 Very Good
4.76 Very Good
4.77 Very Good
4.78 Very Good
4.79 Very Good
4.8 Very Good
4.81 Very Good
4.82 Very Good
4.83 Very Good
4.84 Very Good
4.85 Very Good
4.86 Very Good
4.87 Very Good
4.88 Very Good
4.89 Very Good
4.9 Very Good
4.91 Very Good
4.92 Very Good
4.93 Very Good
4.94 Very Good
4.95 Very Good
4.96 Very Good
4.97 Very Good
4.98 Very Good
4.99 Very Good
5 Outstanding

Program Evaluation Analysis Sample Computation

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Program Evaluation Analysis Sample Computation

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

PROGRAM EVALUATION ANALYSIS

A. Program Design and Organization

D. Program Administration and Management

Facilitator/Trainer (Alfonso P. Francisco)

Facilitator/Trainer (Andres F. Cabalu)

Facilitator/Trainer (Gervacio Faustino)

KATHRINE RAMOS - ANGELES

4 5 5 4.20 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

4 5 4 4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

5 4 4.25 Very Good

4 4 4.00 Very Good

4 4.00 Very Good

4 4.00 Very Good

4.00 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

3.90 Very Good / Very Satisfactory The item on "Training

3.91 Very Good / Very Satisfactory

The item on "Program

4.25 Very Good

The item on "

4.00 Very Good

4.00 Very Good

As a whole, the rating given to the program is 4.23 or

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi