ANNEX 11 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION

School Description Remarks Period of Data Presentation Data

Profile Reporting Source/Forms
1. ● Total number of learners enrolled From 2016, the Mid-year Enrolment By Gender SF-1: School
Enrolment o By gender number of both the (BoSY data) Historical Enrolment by Gender
Register;
o Last 3 years male and female Year-end EBEIS
enrollees significantly (EoSY data) 2018-2019
1600
1905
3505
SY TOTAL BOYS GIRLS increased. 1523
2017-2018 1801
2016-2017 3223 1764 1459 3324

1459
2017-2018 3324 1801 1523 2016-2017 1764
3223

2018-2019 3505 1905 1600 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

GIRLS BOYS TOTAL ENROLMENT

2. Health In the beginning of Mid-year Number Of Learners By Health Nutritional

and Leve Wasted Severely SY 2018-2019, 18 % Year-end Status, SY 2018-2019 Status
nutritional l Wasted (629 out of 3505) of Report/School
status T M F T M F the learners fall Records
K 80 40 40 75 39 36 outside the normal
G 1 74 31 43 36 26 10 health status.
G 2 58 40 18 34 27 7
G3 65 38 27 47 34 13
G4 37 23 14 18 14 4
G 5 32 17 15 21 14 7
G 6 38 20 18 14 7 7
T 384 209 175 245 161 84
% 54. 45. 65.7 34.
T 43 57 1% 29
% % %
3. Learners SUBJECT AREA TOTAL At the end of the Year-end Learners’ Materials SF-3: Books
materials* ENGLISH 2542 school year, there Issued and
FILIPINO 2173 was a shortage of Returned;
MATH 3023 textbooks in the Physical Count
MTB 1293 Grades 5 and 6 level. of Inventories/
MAPEH 2791 School
AP 2186 Property
ESP 2688 Custodian
SCIENCE 1278 Records
EPP/TLE 1021

4. Teachers’ ● Number of teachers who attended With GBES’ thrive Mid-year Accomplishme
professional training/further studies to promote teacher Year-end nt Report/
developmen ● By kind/type of professional quality, the school School
t* development (e.g. ICT, Further studies, conducts LACs and Records
INSET, LAC, etc) INSETs per subject
● Current year area, the teachers
TRAININGS/SEMINARS TOTAL are also encouraged
GAD 3 to attend externally
sponsored seminars
DIVISION TRAININGS 8
for personal
DSLAC 12 development.
SLAC 18
NATIONAL 0
INTERNATIONAL 3
5. Funding ● Funding amount and sources (MOOE, The biggest source Mid-year Financial
sources* LGU, canteen, donors, etc.) of school funding this Year-end reports;
● Current year school year come Monthly MOOE
Amount Fund Source from the donations, liquidation
141,000 School MOOE MOOE and canteen. reports
100,000 Subsidy for Special Programs The funds raised by
100,000 Local Government Unit funds the Brigada Team,
500,000.00 Canteen funds
SPG and GPTA
2,176,989.00 Donations
supported the school
projects and
programs.

6. School ● Top 3 awards/ recognition from award- Through the years Mid-year Accomplishme
awards and giving bodies duly recognized by DepEd ,GBES’ thrust to Year-end nt report/
recognition improve the school’s School
s 2018 District Schools Press in English and Filipino performance has Records
Winners
Feature Writing Category paved the way for
Copy Reading and Headline News Writing Winner both the pupils and
Editorial Writing Winner the faculty to achieve
2018 Division Press Conference in Schools and recognition for their
Filipino outstanding
2018 Municipal AP Festival of Talents, Quiz Bee,
Poster Making accomplishments.
2018 Division Araling Panlipunan Festival of Talents:
Quiz Bee Winners
2018 Division Search for Brigada Eskwela Best
Implementers Brigada Coordinator
2018 Division Search for Brigada Eskwela Best
Implementer
1st Place 2018 District Search for Brigada Eskwela
Best Implementer
1st Place Drum and Lyre Parade Competition 2018
1st Place Division Search for Brigada Eskwela Best
Implementers for Mega School
SM UN Celebration Champion : Most Number of
Participants
*Data not found in the EBEIS
 Data
Performanc Period of
Description Remarks Data Presentation Source/Form
e Indicators Reporting s
ACCESS
7. Number and ● Count and percentage of learners who At the end of SY Year-end SF-4: Monthly
rate of dropouts do not finish a particular grade level. (It 2018-2019, 58 out Learner’s
by cause does not capture learners who finish a of 3365 pupils Movement and
grade level but do not enrol in the next dropped out. The Attendance; SF-
grade level the following school year) main causes of the 2: Daily
● Look at the five (5) major causes of problem are Attendance
dropout in the school financial Report of
reason/poverty and Learners; EBEIS
Number of Dropouts by Cause (Current the distance of
SY) school from home.
Financial Matters 20 The school
congregated to
Health and Nutrition 4 implement the best
DORP practices to
Child Labor 2 arrest the number of
SARDOs for the
Distance fof school from Home 10 attainment of the
EFA goals.
Lack of Interest 7

Others 10
QUALITY
8. Percentage ● Percentage of learners who At the end of the Year-end EBEIS:
of learners completed the school year school year, the Enrolment
who ● Number of promoted learners promotional rate data; SF-6:
completed the over number of total learners x 100 was maintained Summarized
School Year ● Per grade level at the primary Report on
(Promotion ● Current year levels with 100%. Promotion and
Rate) Grade Level % There are only 7 Level of
Kinder 100 out of 3365 pupils Proficiency
Grade 1 101 who did not get
Grade 2 100 promoted to the
Grade 3 106 next level.
Grade 4 98
Grade 5 99
Grade 6 99
9. National ● MPS per subject In the recent NAT Year-end Report from
Achievement ● Grade 6/10 results for complete Result, pupils NETRC
Test (NAT) – schools performed well in
by Mean ● Grade 3/8 results for incomplete Filipino, HEKASI
Percentage schools and English.
Score (MPS) ● Current year Interventions
were proposed to
SY Before Previous SY: 12-13 remedy the
Level Engli Filip Scie HEKA
sh ino Math nce SI
alarming MPS in
Grade
41.37
61.2
32.36 35.67 48.1
the Mathematics
6/10 6
and Science
Previous SY: 13-14
Level Engli Filip Scie HEKA areas.
sh ino Math nce SI
Grade 66.9
43.59 40.2 40.12 46.24
6/10 2
Current SY: 14-15
Level Engli Filip Scie HEKA
sh ino Math nce SI
Grade
41.8 57.2 29.95 37.51 45.5
6/10
10. Literacy ● Total number of learners who are PHIL-IRI results Mid-year Philippine
level in the frustration, instructional, and show an alarming Year-end Informal
independent levels for English and high number of Reading
Filipino (oral and silent reading) nonreaders in the Inventory
● Should show pre and post test intermediate (PHIL-IRI);
results levels. It means McCall-Crab
● If PHIL-IRI is used, will cover that the Reading Reading
grades 2-6 only Team will Comprehensio
● Current year purposely focus n Examination
on administering or its
ENGLISH FILIPINO immediate equivalent
Reading Pre Post Pre Post
Frustration 197 100 243 76 actions to
Instructional 34 64 123 140 decrease if not
Independent 231 276 92 242
arrest the said
numbers of
frustration
readers.

GOVERNANCE
11. School- ● School level based on SBM SBM Assessment Year-end 1 - DEVELOPING SBM
Based Assessment Result was 1- Assessment
Management Developing.
Assessment 1 -- DEVELOPING
Level
12. Child- ● Survey to be accomplished by the GBES is a child Year-end Points and status Child-Friendly
Friendly School Planning Team friendly school School Self-
Action
School Survey ● Based on CFSS point system: according to the Items / 13
Assessment
result* o 25-29 points: Child-Friendly result of the Goals
School conducted SFS Progress
o 30-34 points: Outstanding Survey. toward 11
Targets
Child-Friendly School
TOTAL
 35 and above points: Very SCORE
26
Outstanding Child-Friendly
School 26 – CHILD FRIENDLY
SCHOOL
Action Items / Goals 13
Progress toward Targets 11
TOTAL SCORE 26

26 – CHILD FRIENDLY SCHOOL

13. There will be two (2) data sets: Over the years, Mid-year Attendance
Stakeholders’ 1. Percentage (number of the stakeholders Year-end sheets;
participation* attendees over those invited) of of GBES have DepEd order
parents/guardians and other been but amiable 18: School
stakeholders who attend during: and supportive to Calendar
o Co-curricular activities
all the programs
(Science month, Reading
month, contests, etc.) and projects of
o Extra-curricular activities the school.
(Boy Scouts, Brigada
Eskwela, sports fests, etc.)
o Meetings and Assemblies
(SIP, CI, General PTA, etc.)
 Current year
2. Total contribution (in kind, man-
hours, etc.) of stakeholders
which are accounted
 Current year
 By reporting period (Mid-
year and Year-end)
VOLUNTEER HOURS
CONTEST 52
SCOUTING 60
ASSEMBLIES 25
BRIGADA ESKWELA 27,005
DRUM & LYRE 60
OFF CAMPUS 13
EDUC SUMMIT 20
ORIENTATION 23
CLOSING PROGRAM 5

VOLUNTEER CASH
CONTEST 1500
SCOUTING 5000
BRIGADA ESKWELA 804,928.00
DRUM & LYRE 1,500
OFF CAMPUS 31,000
ACTIVITIES
CLOSING PROGRAM 10,000
14. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of GBES’ Year-end SF-7: School
Teacher ratio learners to teachers against the Kindergarten to Personnel
standard: Grade 6 class size Assignment
o Kinder (25:1) is bigger than the List and Basic
o Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) recommended Profile; SF-1:
pupil-teacher
o Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) School
ratio.
o SHS (40:1) Register;
● Per grade level EBEIS
● Current year

Grade Teachers Ratio

Kinder 14 1:35
Grade 1 10 1:56
Grade 2 8 1:53
Grade 3 8 1:58
Grade 4 10 1:53
Grade 5 10 1:58
Grade 6 9 1:51
15. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of GBES’ Year-end EBEIS:
Classroom learners to classrooms against the Kindergarten to Facilities and
ratio standard: Grade 6 class size Structures
o Kinder (25:1) is bigger than the
o Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) recommended
o Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) pupil-classroom
o SHS (40:1) ratio.
● Per grade level This means that
● Current year many classrooms
are still
Grade Teachers Ratio overcrowded.
Kinder 14 1:35
Grade 1 10 1:56
Grade 2 8 1:53
Grade 3 8 1:58
Grade 4 10 1:53
Grade 5 10 1:58
Grade 6 9 1:51
 16. Learner-  Comparison of the actual ratio of There are not Year-end EBEIS:
Toilet ratio learners to functional toilets enough toilets to Facilities and
against standards (50:1) accommodate all Structures
 Total number students. It is a
 By gender taxing job to
 Current year maintain an
acceptable
Male Female cleanliness level
1905 71:1 1600 59:1 of the bathrooms.

17. Learner- ● Comparison of the actual ratio of There are currently Year-end Consolidated
Seat ratio learners to seats against the not enough seats Report on
standard (1:1) for all our students. Desk/Armchair
● Total number s for ES and
● Current year SS; EBEIS

Note: CFS – Child-Friendly School (The Child-Friendly School Assessment was made by UNICEF. The concept for establishing a Child-Friendly
School System (CFSS) in the Philippines was introduced in 1999 and is currently being reviewed so it can be utilized/integrated in school
planning, monitoring and evaluation).
SF – School Forms
*Data not found in the EBEIS
 Status of
Period of Data
School Description Remarks Data Presentation Source/Forms
Reporting
Projects
18. Status of ● The progress of CI projects The recently Mid-year School
Annual ● Data sets may differ depending on concluded Year-end Records/
Implementati what the school wants to present reading Project Team
on Plan ● Current year intervention Records/Annu
(AIP)/Continu program helped al
ous Project Title Target 115 non-readers Accomplishme
Improvement Actual in Grade 3 and 34 nt Report
(CI) Projects* Status/Accomplishments Grade Two pupils
moved a step
higher from their
Star 138 115 83% current reading
Yaman 39 34 87% level.
Lingap 629 484 77%

19. Other ● Reports done by other stakeholders ● The school Mid-year

stakeholders on their initiatives/activities may choose the Year-end SOURCE: School
’ independent from the PIA/CI projects top 3 stakeholder Records/
accomplishm (e.g. activities of the SGC, SPG/SSG, accomplishments/ Accomplishment
ents* etc.) initiatives/activitie reports of SPG,
● Data sets may differ depending on s GPTA, CI Team
the initiatives/activities of the Records
stakeholders
● Current year

Cash Donation
BE Stakeholders 1,706,988.50
GPTA 450,000
C.I Project 10,000