Parpar: by Benjamin Gal-Or, All Rights Reserved

By Benjamin Gal-Or, All Rights Reserved
PARPAR

By fesoj - Otakárek fenyklový [Papilio machaon]Uploaded by ComputerHotline, CC BY 2.0,
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7263187
All Rights Reserved to Prof.-Dr. Benjamin Gal-Or, 9th Edition
Introduction to
Cosmology, Physics
Philosophy
and

2
D ETECTED, NTERWOVEN, I
TWO SIMULTANEOUS
COSMIC EXPANSIONS
of gigantic, dark-cold,
intergalactic-voids,
Cause observed 'Walls-Filaments" around each
to be compacted by dynamics lead to
(1) 1998-Discovered
acclelerated expansion of the Universe,
(2) The Origin of the Astrophysical New, Gold-
Awarded, School of Thermodynamics

By Prof.-Dr. Benjamin Gal-Or
1 Million+ Google citations

"We are all Galorians", Editor, Foundations of Physics, 9TH EDITION
"Gal-Or launches a new spirit of inquiry by his excellent and thought provoking
writings. I would recommend awarding a prize and would hope that this would serve
to focus attention on a most important subject.”
Gold Award by N.Y. Academy of Sciences
(Rival article by S. Hawking did not make it.)

3

"Einstein's time-symmetric tensor was elevated by Gal-Or’s “New Astronomical
School of Unified Thermodynamics” to the status of the source of “Master
Asymmetry” controlling not only irreversible thermodynamics, but all physical and
biological phenomena!
Gal-Or calls “GRAVITISM” (his philosophy) that gravitation is the prime cause of
structures, irreversibility, time, geo-chemical and biological evolution -- that the
expansion of the universe is the cause of the second law of thermodynamics -- that
microscopic physics, and thermodynamics in particular, cannot be understood without
reference to cosmology.
He ties “irreversibility” to the “expansion of space itself”, i.e. as far as space is
expanding, the contribution of all kinds of radiation in space is weakened
“irreversibly” due to the expansion phenomenon itself.
Such loss, or “degradation” of energy in the depth of inter-cluster expanding space,
may then be considered as a universal sink for all the radiation flowing out of the
material bodies in the expanding universe.”
Advancement of Physic
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS:

“Gal-Or's remarkable book sees and seizes the world whole.
He emphasizes that all scientists operate under some set of philosophical

prejudices, and that failure to acknowledge this is self-delusion. Furthermore, he
argues that a failure to attend to the philosophical base of physics leads to an empty
scientism.
His work is challenging on many levels, constituting a review 'with derivations' of

general relativity 'as applied to cosmology', thermodynamics, the current state of
theoretical particle physics, astrophysics, as well as a summary history of western
philosophy, 'especially the philosophies of time and mind' and critiques of western
society, the intelligentsia and the relationship between academic science and
government.
One 'and perhaps the central' theme explored, is that of the interplay between
symmetry and asymmetry.

4

His primary interest is not in the recent progress in the unification of forces in
gauge theory, although he finds support in it for his Einsteinian outlook, but is rather
time, time's arrow, and the asymmetry between past and future. Around time are
accumulated discussions, both mathematical and philosophical, of thermodynamic
reversibility, time reversibility, the nature of causality, and the use of advanced and
retarded solutions to wave equations.
The second major theme is that of gravity and its overwhelming domination of the
actual form of the universe, at all scales.
The combination of these themes is not accidental; they are point and
counterpoint to his thesis that the time asymmetries are connectable to and perhaps
even determined by the master asymmetry given by the gravity of general relativity:
the remorseless cosmological expansion.
He argues that only the expansion can provide the unification of time asymmetries.
The expansion provides, among other things, an unsaturable sink for radiation,
which, in turn, permits the establishment of gradients in temperature and density,
which provide the basis for the physical process that leads to life.
He also criticizes the sloppy and improper use of the concepts of entropy 'and the
related notions in information theory' and quantum indeterminism, especially as
covers for an inadequate understanding of temporal asymmetries.
Taking an Einsteinian position on the interpretation of quantum mechanics, he
looks forward to revitalization of Einstein's quest for a deterministic interpretation of
quantum events.
The value of this book lies in the challenging combination of ideas which Gal-Or
presents, which goes far beyond what can be sensibly described in a review.
[This] work may be too large to digest as a text in these days of the decline of
academic institutions "as Gal-Or describes them", but that will be the loss of both the
faculty and the students.”
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS

"This is a great book, and an exciting book;
readable, worth reading and enlightening."
Sir Karl Popper, one of the Greatest Philosophers of Science

5

"Gal-Or’s “beauty” has always been the object of science, which, he lyrically observes
as “a most fundamental aesthetic frame of mind, a longing for the run-away
horizons of truth and symmetry that we always try to reach.”
Order Amidst Chaos, Enlightenment Aesthetics

Recommended by Encyclopedia Britannica,
"Nature, Philosophy of"
"This is one of the most beautiful books that I have read."
Outstanding Books List

"Tour de force. A magnificent and sustained piece of work!
Gal-Or’s net is widely cast – it reaches as far as science policy and political
philosophy."
A. Cottrell, V. Chancellor, Cambridge University

"Appeals to scientists of all disciplines who are prepared to open their minds. Shines a
welcome light in some dark corners of science.
Sir Karl Popper, in a Foreword, correctly describes it “a great book”.
New Scientist Magazine
"Evokes a person heart !!
Has generated a large number of responses from around the world,
some declaring that it has turned them into “Gal-Orians”.
Since the thought presented by this book is so rich, translators of our country should
recommend this book with all their intellectual power."
Chinese Academy of Sciences

"A Master Piece. The well-known author bases his philosophy on a very sound
knowledge of present-day scientific theories. "
Indian Journal of Physics

6

"The works of scientists like Gal-Or, Bohm, and (Noble Prize-Winner) Prigogine provide
important resources. Prigogine's formalisms do not really tell us how irreversible
change emerges from reversible [mathematics]. (in this Gal-Or is superior)."
The Crisis of the Sciences

"I do not know a better modern expression of science, philosophy and classical
humanism than that of Gal-Or’s book."
HaAretz Daily

“I have in the meantime studied your book, with great interest, and made pages of
notes on it.
I feel as if I had been on numerous walks and talks with you on the great
questions, and know that would be great to go on with them!
Who cannot be impressed by your love for the great men of all times and all
countries, by your phrase “working back and forth between theory and fact”, by your
belief that philosophy is too important to be left to the philosophers, by your concern
for where thought and language lie in the scheme of things – and by so much more!

I continue to reflect, again and again, on your central thesis that expansion is the
origin of all asymmetry in time.
What an ingenious phrase is your,
“smuggle irreversibility in without declaring the contraband”!
I regard your book as seeking to accomplish two tasks – and being two books – at
the very least One is the exposition of your central thesis, with clarity, and careful
mustering of every argument pro and con that can lead to testable consequences.
I don’t see how it is possible to do proper justice to a thesis of such importance by
mixing it in with the other great task.
That is to give students an appreciation of the unity of philosophy and modern physics.
You do both tasks far better than I could hope to.
I give you my personal thanks for putting the two books into a pacackage that I
personally have found most thought-provoking.” Prof. John Wheeler,
Inst. of Advanced Studies,
Princeton University

7

"Most astrophysicists, cosmologists and astronomers
agree that the biblical account of cosmic evolution, in
stressing `a beginning´ and the initial roles of `void,´
`light´ and a `structure-less´ state, may be uncannily
close to the verified evidence with which modern science has already
supplied us"
Professor Victor F. Weisskopf from MIT,
quotes from CPP in a Scientific American article

“Lecture one [in Volume I] affirms that the stress placed by Genesis on ‘beginning’ and
the initial roles of ‘void’, ‘light’ and a ‘structure-less’ state, “may be uncannily close to
the verified evidence with which modern science has already supplied us.”
Christian Apologetics Journal

“One of the best books on the totality of the sciences & the universe. It was one of the
favorite books of Sir Karl Popper. It looks at physics and the universe as a totality of
the mathematical philosophical understanding. It also combines the physical concept
of time with human psychological perception and brain understanding of languages.”
Robin forumhub.com/expr/@202.54.92.222

8
Cosmology, Physics and Philosophy

Preface
SIR KARL POPPER, Foreword ……………….………..……..… xx
SIR ALAN COTTRELL, Foreword ………………….……......... xxi
Preface ……………………………………..….……….…..….... xxii
Introduction
1.1 The Revival of Relativistic Cosmology vs. Modified
Concepts and Order in Physics and Philosophy
1.1.1 Science Order: Cosmology to Quantum or in Reverse..... 3

1.1.2 How did all start v. Science teaching of that Order….......5
1.1.3 The first seven stages v. tradition ……….....…............... 7
1.1.4 The present matter-dominated era by Astronomy........... 11
2.1 The Einsteinian Methodology: A Preliminary Remark ..... 11
19, 2012
From Terrestrial Gravitational Structures
to Black Holes and Neutrinos in Astrophysics
1.1 Gravitation, Asymmetry and Structure of Earth v. Cosmos ..80

A fallacy associated with current Education ...………...........80
1.1.2 Gravity-induced sedimentary structures …………............. 81
1.2 Stars and the Hertzsprung-Russel Central Diagram ……….. 88
1.3 Supernova, Gravitational Collapse,

Neutron Stars, Pulsars …………………………………….......…92
1.4 X-Ray Astronomy, Binary X-Ray Systems, and...
Gravitational Clocks ……………………………………......... . 100
1.5 Black Holes …………………….……………………….… 106
1.6 Gas, Dust and the Formation of Stars in Our Galaxy ............113
9
1.7 How Are Cosmic Distances Measured? ……………….….. 116

1.8 Neutrino Astronomy and Astrophysics ………………….... 130
1.9 The Emergence of Gamma-Ray Astronomy ………….…... 132
1.10 Exploration of Extra-Solar Space
by Unmanned Spacecraft ……………………….………..…… 134
From Old Physics

to Particle Physics-I
2.1 Aim and Scope ……………………………………………. 138

2.2 Limitations of Theory ……………………………….….… 140
2.3 The General Macroscopic Equation ………………….….... 142
2.4 Continuity Equation (Total Mass Conservation) ………..... 146
2.5 Conservation of Linear Momentum and Gravity.…………. 147
2.6 The Navier-Stokes Equations and Gravity ……………….. 149
2.7 Kinetic-Energy Equation and
Dissipation Function in Gravitational Fields ……………......... 152
2.8 First Law of Thermodynamics or Energy
Conservation Equation ………………………………….......… 154
2.9 First Law and Enthalpy ………………………………….... 156
2.10 First Law In Terms of Temperature Field …………….…. 157
2.11 Entropy Balance Equation ……………………………….. 159
2.12 Beyond Classical Physics:...............…………………...…. 160
2.13 Neutrinos and the Powerful Role Conservation
Equations Play in Subatomic Processes (Addendum) …...…… 163
General Relativity and Relativistic Cosmology

Should Rule Particle-Quantum Physics,
Not the Other Way, Not by Quantum Axioms
3.1 Introduction …………………………………………………....... 167

3.1.1 Einstein’s field equations in general relativity ………..…….… 169
3.1.2 Confirmation of Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation …………..... 172
3.2 Principles and Formulations of General Relativity and
Relativistic Cosmology ………………...……….………………....... 191
3.3 Observations, The “Age” of the Universe.
And “Equivalent Local Cells” …………………….……….….......... 200
3.4 Timekeeping, Accelerated Observers and the
Principle of Equivalence ………………………….……………........ 204
10
3.5 From General Relativity to Unified Field Theories ………….…. 205
From Physics to Philosophical Crossroads and Back

The Arrows of Time
4.1 Time and The Arrow of Time: The Most Distorted of All Ideas? ..215
4.2 Asymmetry-Symmetry-Space-Time and
The Unification of the Laws of Physics …………………….............. 216
4.3 Methodology, Aim and Scope ………………………………....... 217
4.4 Confusing Concepts of Time and Time Asymmetries ………...... 219
4.5 The Entropic Arrow of Time ……………………………….....… 222
4.6 Causality, Causation and Time Asymmetries ………………........ 226
4.7 Causation and Determinism in Relativistic Theories ……..............227
4.8 Cosmological Arrows of Time and Cosmic Time ……….…….... 230
4.9 A Few Remarks ……………………………………...………...... 232
4.10 Time-Reversal Invariance and Irreversibility …………….……. 236
4.10 Microscopic Time Asymmetries in “Elementary Particles” … .. 240
4.11 Death of Scale-Based Physics….......….………….……….......... 242
4.12 “Dual” Quantum-Geometrodynamical School and “Superspace” 243
4.13 Tachyons and Causal Violations …………………….………. ....246
4.14 Macrocausality and Microcausality in Quantum Mechanics …... 247
4.15 Fading Memory in Classical Physics …………………………... 247
4.16 Doubts as to the Universality of Entropy ……………………..... 249
4.17 Entropy-Free Thermodynamic Arrows of Time ………….…... . 250
Crisis in the Standard Quantum Model
Gravitation & Cosmology unpredictable by Quantum Model
5.1 Preliminary Review …………………………………….……...... 255

5.1.1 The three main schools of thought ……………………............. 261
5.2 Einstein’s Objections to the Uncertainty Principle ………........... 262
5.3 The Heresy of a Few Skeptics ………………………….…......... 265
5.4 Mythologized Concepts of Quantum Physics …………...…....... 265
5.5 The Failure of Classical and Quantal Statistical
Mechanics to Deduce Irreversibility and Time Asymmetries .............267
5.6 The Emergence of Quantum Chromodynamics
and Super-Symmetry …………………………………….................. 272

5.6.1 Spatio-Temporal Approach to Quantum Physics ……….......... 272
11
5.6.2 From Weinberg-Salam Theory to

Quantum Chromodynamics ………………………............................ 273
5.6.2.1 Conservation laws as symmetry principles; and vice versa ... 273
5.6.2.2 Global, exact, approximate, isotopic and SU(3) symmetries 274

5.6.2.3 From SU(3) to renormalizable gauge theories ……............... 276
5.6.2.4 Quark confinement asymptotic freedom in gauge theories 276-1
5.6.2.5 QCD and the search for higher symmetry principles ……... 276-2
5.6.3 Quantum Field Theories, Super-Symmetry & Super-Gravity... 276-3
5.6.3.1 Limits of quantum gravity and ‘Unified Field Theories’ .......276-4
From Physics to Cosmological Crossroads and Back

Cosmology Assessed by Physics and Philosophy
6.1 FIRST: Reduction of Thermodynamics to Gravitation ...,... 277

6.1.1 Intergalactic voids rule 2 Expansions of the Universe....,..277
6.1.2 Gravitation as super-structuring of matter and All Life.....279
6.2 The Earliest Observational Evidence. .…...………...........279
6.2.1 Which space expands and which does not? …...….......... 282
6.3 Gravitation-Asymmetry Principle of Equivalence …….......284
6.4 Can Inter-cluster Voids Be Saturated with Radiation? .........287
6.5 Derivation of the Master Asymmetry form
our Gravitational School of Intergalactic Voids v. life........ 290
6.6 Irreversibility in the New Gravitational.
Cosmological Thermodynamics ………………................. 293
6.7 Origin of Dissipation in Newtonian Fluids ……..….......… 297
6.8 Terrestrial Thermodynamics ……………………..……..... 299
6.9 Connections with Classical and Continuum
Thermodynamics …………………………..…..…............. 301
6.10 Electromagnetic Irreversibility v. Master Asymmetry....... 303
The Cosmological Base of Time Arrow
7.1 Time: The All-Embracing Concept …………………................. 309

7.2 Cosmological Origin of Time ……………………….................. 310
7.3 Cosmological Interpretations of Newton’s Laws of Motion …... 314
7.4 Gravitational Origin of Structure and Evolution .……................ 316
7.5 Gravitation and the Outflow of Energy Into Un-Saturable Space 322
7.6 Stellar Evolution …………………………………….................. 324
7.7 Terrestrial Evolution …………………………..............……...... 325
12
Black Holes v. Unattainable "Theory of Everything"
8.1 Introduction ………………………………………...… 330

8.2 Observational Evidence ………………………….….....331
8.3 Schwarzschild Solution and Black Holes …………...... 332
8.4 Black Holes Mechanics and Entropy ………………..... 340
8.5 Can Black Holes “Evaporate”? ……………………...... 341
8.6 Primordial Black Holes? …………………………........ 341
8.7 Back to the Melting Pot of Unification? …………........ 341
Beyond Present Knowledge
9.1 The Futile Quest for Final Answers …………………...... 349

9.2 An Example in Havaism ……………………..….........… 350
9.3 From Cosmology to Irreversible Structures and Memory 365
9.4 The Skeptic Outlook ……………………………..…...… 415
VOLUME II
Introduction ……………………………………………................... 420
A Few Historical Remarks on Time, Mind and Symmetry ………... 437
The Philosophy of Time & Change:
Some Historical Notions …………………….……………….…...... 455
Structuralism and the Divided American Thought:
A Short Glossary of Terms ………………………………..……….. 467
Policy and Publicity: A Critique ………………………………….... 483
Thought-Provoking and Thought-Depressing Quotations ………..... 495
Critique of Western Methodology ………………………………. ... 530

13
Einsteinian Herritage
A 1987 Painting by E. Katz, by permission.

“It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. It
was the experience of mystery -- even if mixed with fear -- that engendered religion."
"A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the
manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which are only
accessible to our reason in their most

14
elementary forms -- it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious
attitude;in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man.”
“I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of
the type of which we are conscious in ourselves. An individual who should survive his
physical death is also beyond my comprehension, nor do I wish it otherwise; such notions
are for the fears or absurd egoism of feeble souls.” “Enough for me the mystery of the
eternity of life, and the inkling of the marvelous structure of reality, together with the
single-hearted endeavor to comprehend a portion, be it never so tiny, of the reason that
manifests itself in nature.”
“I gang my own gait and have never belonged to my country, my home, my friends, or
even my immediate family, with my whole heart; in the face of all these ties I have never
lost an obstinate sense of detachment, which increases with age.”.
“One is sharply conscious, yet without regret, of the limits to the possibility of mutual
understanding and sympathy with one's fellow-creatures. Such a person no doubt loses
something in the way of geniality and light-heartedness; on the other hand, he is largely
independent of the opinions, habits, and judgments of his fellows.”
In lieu of the aforementioned personal-life philosophy-faith, Einstein consistently selected
to protect his privacy inside his room, in his house, working in maximized-freedom,
undisturbed solitude; even sleeping naked in his room while his privacy has been strictly
guarded by his devoted secretary Helen Dukas, who also screened his incoming mail, deleted
nasty or anti-Semitic letters and politely blocking unwanted visitors. Einstein is also known
for his subtle sarcasm.

15

Theoretical Physics at its Highest Historical Level
Sitting, from left:
Sitting: I. Langmuir, M. Planck, Marie Curie, H.A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, P. Langevin, Ch.-E. Guye, C.T.R.
Wilson, O.W. Richardson
2nd Sitting: P. Debye, M. Knudsen, W.L. Bragg, H.A. Kramers, P.A.M. Dirac, A.H. Compton, L. de
Broglie, M. Born, N. Bohr; Standing: A. Piccard, E. Henriot, P. Ehrenfest, E. Herzen, Th. de Donder, E.
Schrödinger, J.E. Verschaffelt, W. Pauli, W. Heisenberg, R.H. Fowler, L. Brillouin.
1927, Inst. Int'l de Physique Solvay
16
This high level of physics was reached post (i) The creation of the 1915 Einsteinian Gravity Physics
(General Relativity) that predicts a strange, socially unwanted, world expansion (or contraction), (ii)
That unwanted theory was first confirmed in1918 in correctly predicting the bending of light by
gravitation in curved space-time, (iii) Re-confirmed before 1927 by the American astronomer
Hubble: We all live in an expanding world that had "beginning", as the Bible states In its first
Chapter.
_______________
Perfection of means and confusion of goals, seem – in my opinion – to
characterize our age. ----- Albert Einstein

Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is
limited. Imagination encircles the world.----- Albert Einstein

The pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, an almost fanatical love of
justice, and the desire for personal independence--these are the features
of Jewish tradition which make me thank my stars that I belong to it. -----
Albert Einstein

Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from
mediocre minds ----- Albert Einstein

INFINITIES? -- the universe and human stupidity, and am not sure about
the universe. (Einstein);

Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything
new.----- Albert Einstein

Do what you feel to be right, for you'll be criticized anyway -----
Eleanor Roosevelt

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can
change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.
------ Margaret Mead

17

Nobel Laureate RICHARD FEYNMAN:

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself – and
you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very
careful about that.
After you’ve not fooled yourself, it’s easy not to fool other
scientists. You just have to be honest in a conventional
way.”
“You should not fool the layman when you’re talking as a

scientist."
Before Einstein left Hitler’s Germany to the United States, a

professor in Berlin was extremely nasty in targeting him. One day
Einstein was informed that Professor XXX just died. Einstein’s
reaction:
“Everyone does something good in his life, even Professor XXX; he died."
Einstein's "Anti-Pomposity"; Anti-"Politically Correct"

As a younger man he used to play his beloved violin in the homes of some German
women. One day, while he was playing there, they started knitting. Einstein stopped
playing, packed his violin to leave, and apologized:
“I would not even dream to disturb you from your knitting work.”On another
occasion, as a celebrity living in his house near a lake outside Berlin, his wife urged him to
18
change his simple, but comfortable home dress, to a formal one, for dignitaries are to
arrive soon to visit him. His response:
let them meet me as I am dressed and work in my house.

If they come to see my formal dress, please show them my closet.

___________

PREFACE to Volume III, 9 TH
EDITION, 2019

TWO, not one, 1998-verified, accelerated expansions of the universe,
had been published 48 years ago, and again, in 1981, by Vol. without
resorting to undetectable, DARK ENERGY speculations claimed today
by armies of bored physists.
The second, accelerating, expansion of intergalactic voids, Fig. 1,
causes the observed galaxies-clustering into FILAMENTS around each
intergalactic expanding voids, Fig. 1 and 2.
It is a late simultaneous expansion of the universe. It has become
significant in reversing the slowing down by gravity of the geneal
relativistic world expansion but only when the observed "stellar and
19
galactic radiation-winds-jets", Figs. 1 to 3, have been intensified, as
explained below.

1969-predicted 2 Expansions of the Universe

FIG. 1: The four yellow arrows depicted should be inserted into each and all recorded dark
voids recorded by NASA to prove that opposing, rocket-type-winds compact galaxies from
opposing sides of each filament, thus accelerating the expansion of each and all collectively.
TWO, not one, 1998-verified expansions of the universe AND WELL-VERIFIED
compacting of galaxies into CLUSTERS-FILAMENTS FORM THE FIRST FACTUAL
20
BASE OF THIS THEORY-FACTS, which had been published in April 1969 on the
basis of early detected intergalactic coldest voids (dark blue in Fig. 5)

Fig. 2 was taken from 1981 Vol. I of CPP (reviewed in the first pages above).
n
(1) The winds-jets entering each void from all directions amplify their remnant expansion, Figs. 1-5.
(2) Collectively expanding the voids compact galaxies into the observed clusters, Fig. 2, and further
into "filaments", Fig. 1.
(3) Strong winds-jets reverse gravity-induced, remnant inertia world expansion deceleration,
(5) The results lead to revised & new cosmology-physics-philosophy as outlined in the first pages.

FIG. 2: Revised cosmology-physics-philosophy DICTIONNARY

"CLUSTER I" and "II" represent mid-STAGE of the 2nd expansion.
"RADIATION ENERGY DENSITY" vs. "DISTANCE" defines "DIRECTION OF NET RADIATION

FLOW" as "3rd COSMOLOGICAL ARROW", generate energy-density gradients that lead
21

to the "2nd COSMOLOGICAL ARROW", that represents "EXPANDING SPACE "1"

CONFINED TO COLD-DARK, "VOIDS/SPACE "1" is thus the sole MASTER of world phenomena that
lead to the emergence of life in non-expanding gravitational systems:The MASTER ARROW OF TIME
• THE MASTER OF TIME ASYMMTEIES
• THE ROOT CAUSE OF OUR 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
• THE SOLE ASYMMETRIC FUNDAMENTAL LAW IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS.
• The largest, expanding, un-saturable, thermodynamic sink of disposed energy from active emitters in the
universe.
Fig. 3: SPACE-"2" wraps all

non-expanding galaxies [Fig.
1], and non-expanding SPACE"3"
where super-fast, interstellar winds
flow out to SPACE-"2" and next
irreversibly dissipate in SUPER-COLD,

EXPANDING, FILAMENT-COMPACTING
SPACE-"1" composed of coldest VOIDS
located between all Super-Clusters-filaments of galaxies, [Figures 1, 2], including ''our VIRGO
FILAMENT" [Fig.-1-center] inside which our local group of galaxies are located [Fig. 1].
All images from author's Volume-I or Wikipedia.

22
How Voids have Increased since 700 ml years post the Big Bang?
Fig. 4: (below} This figure does NOT show the verified chain of galaxies being first
compacted by the winds into clusters (FIG. 2) then further compacted into super-clusters
'FILAMENTS' or what had been defined by Volume I an independently expanding SPACE-"1"
by the inflowing winds (FIG 2). Part of the answer is provided by the next verified record.
23

Fig. 5: The earliest detected intergalactic voids (dark blue) vs. early galaxies that radiate winds
into the early cold voids which have been expanding with the big-bang expansion (Fig. 4).
Gradually, as the number and intensities of emitters has increased, the thermodynamic
wind-processes depicted by Figs. 1 to 3, have established an independent, second, uniform,
simultaneous, extra-expansion of the universe outside the galaxies, 2nd expansion that has
gradually reversed the slowing down of the big-bang inertia expansion into the currently
observed, slightly accelerating expansion of the universe. Source: The cosmic background
radiation verified since 1964.
Fig. 6: (below) Zooming next into ''our'' cluster of non-expanding galaxies in ''our''
'filament' and into a dark-cold expanding void (FIGURE 1) may help illustrate important
24
DISTANCES involved the verified 2nd expansion of the universe. WHAT WE shall SEE
NEXT ARE IMAGES INSIDE OUR own FILAMENT.
Zooming back to 1 Million ly reveals: Our SPACE-2 "Neighborhood”, which is home to

thousands of galaxies. Even at this scale our entire solar system is less than a visible dot
somewhere in the marked “Local Group”. Our home cluster is marked Virgo.
Fig. 7: Even at this scale our Solar System, which is located inside the Milky Way galaxy, is still
less than a visible dot.
25
The Andromeda galaxy is marked in yellow. Both galaxies are the largest in our Local Group,
which is about 10,000,000 light-years in its largest spatial ‘diameter’. The "Local Group"
includes M49, M58, M59, M60, M61, M84, M86, M87, M89 and M31 (Andromeda).It is 2,200,000
light-years away and is almost similar to our galaxy. It is also characterized by a spiral structure.
We see it today as it was when the earliest hominids left East Africa to arrive at the "promised land".
Andromeda’s system consists of Cassiopeia Dwarf, Pegasus dSph, M32, M110, NGC 147, NGC195,
AND I-V, etc. The Triangulum Galaxy, the 3rd largest galaxy in ‘our’ local group, also includes the
Pisces Dwarf as a satellite. ‘Our’ satellite galaxies consist of the Large and Small Magellanic
Interim Concluding Remarks Super-fast stellar-galactic ''winds'' [FIG. 3] flow out (from
the ''sides'') of the OBSERVED ''compacted 'filaments'' of super clusters of galaxies [FIG.1] to
BORDERING colder voids [SPACE ''1'' in FIGS. 1 and 2], WHERE THEY IRREVERSIBLY
dissipate WHILE ADDINING EXTRA OR 2ND EXPANSION TO THE REMNANT INERTIA
COSMIC EXPANSION SINCE/BY THE BIG BANG, [FIG. 4]. Entering each SPACE ''1'' void from
all 3D directions [FIG. 1] subject to momentum conservation, (which also controls opposing
rockets or jet engines), the super-fast winds thrust-push all voids away from each other, thereby,
collectively, providing extra expansion against all other similarly expanding voids. This process is
herein defined 2nd expansion of the universe. Gradually, they cause REVERSAL of the earlier,
decelerated expansion of the universe, into the observed, slightly accelerating expansion of the
universe.
26
Fig. 8: NEXT TO 10 MLY WE OBSERVE 'OUR' VIRGO PRIOR TO ALOCATING IT AT 100

MLY IN FIG. 1.
27
RECAP
STELLAR EVOLUTION SUBJECT to

2 EXPANSIONS OF THE UNIVERSE
Stars cannot completely evolve to produce the element of life without
disposing its inner generated energy.
That energy is irreversibly removed from their surfaces and being disposed it the depths
of this 2nd-expansion-generated largest collective energy sink in the universe.
WHEREFORE, without the 2nd simultaneous expansion of the universe, all heavy
elements in the universe, including the elements essential to generate life, like oxygen,
carbon, nitrogen, are impossible.
Also impossible without the 2nd expansion are supernovae, that allow planets to
formed and life to emerge by gravitation – a complicated process that is described next.
Localized black holes at the center of galaxies and elsewhere should be accounted for,
but their effects do not change these predictions, assertions and facts as detailed here
and by Volume I.
Existence of super-fast, stellar-galactic winds that are becoming strongest during the last
6 or so billion years, has been well-verified by all astronomic observations.
Such winds are flowing into each equally distributed intergalactic voids.
The voids themselves were present from earlier time, as proven by the 1964 confirmed
black-body radiation. Fig. 5.
The winds emerge inside the filaments that surround each void.
The winds enter each void from all directions thus causing each and all to expand
faster than the remnants of big-bang expansion. FIG. 1.
Subject to momentum conservation, like in opposing rockets in space, the super-fast

winds on both opposing sides of any filament or void border [FIG. 1] thrust-push-away
28

border-sharing-voids from each other, collectively providing extra expansion-

thrusting-away against all other similarly expanding voids.
This process is herein defined the second, simultaneous, accelerated expansion of the
universe, which not only compacts galaxies into superclusters and filaments, but
reverses earlier gravity-induced decelerated expansion of the universe.
These newly defined dynamics generate energy-densities gradients (Fig. 2) that keep
maintaining all stellar evolution by removing disposed energy from emitters to 2nd-
expansion-generated largest energy sink in the universe, without which, no heavy
elements, supernovae, planets and life, are possible.
There is no transfer of energy from one expanding void to another due to the uniform
distribution of the intergalactic voids.
The ORIGIN of almost all dissipating stellar and galactic winds are essentially limited to
the nearby LOCAL stars and galaxies that surround each void.
Only a minor fraction of the winds proceeds across the universe to reach our
telescopes, allowing NASA recording of Fig. 1.
Various claims and dictums are also refuted by this newly defined world:
Wheeler-Feynman static-space-theory should be redefined for two simultaneous

space expansions between emitters and absorbers,
Dark energy claims -- and associated attempts to change general relativity) -- should be
replaced by the two proven simultaneous accelerated expansions of the universe.
NOTES
(1) Deterministic physics may begin with TIME-symmetric partial differential equations.
NEXT, TO CONFORM WITH observations, TIME-asymmetry is FUNDAMENTALLY wrongly
enforced on the USED EQUATIONS but also in published 'proofs', that proceed only
(2) from imposed INITIAL CONDITIONS (for future time evolution), while rejecting FINAL
CONDITIONS (for symmetric past time evolution).
29

(3) SUCH enforced ''mathematical results'' are often claimed the origin of irreversibility of
nature called Retarded solutions in electromagnetism.
(4) FOOLING THEMSELVES AND OTHER SCIENTISTS AROUND THE WORLD NEXT HIDE ADVANCED
SOLUTIONS (which do not conform with observations.).
(5) IS THIS FOOLING tantamounts to SMUGGLING into "proofs" what one tries to prove by not DECLARING
THE CONTRABAND?

History, Physics, Society

Why the TIME Magazine selects Einstein as Person of the Century?
On page 551 of his remakable book "EINSTEIN, His Life and Universe",
Walter Isaacson concludes:
"He was a loner with an intimate bond to humanity, a rebel who was suffused with reverence. And
thus it was that an imaginative, impertinent patent clerk became the mind reader of the creator of the
cosmos, the locksmith of the mysteries of the atom and the universe."
On page 215 Issaacson explains:
"(During October-November 1915) Einstein was in the throes of one of the most concentrated frenzies
of scientific creativity in history. He was working, he said, 'horrendously intensity'" (to complete and
publish first his general relativity). "In the midst of this ordeal, he was also still dealing with the
personal crisis within his family." "(Hilbert) was racing him to find the equations of general relativity."
On page 214 Isaacson adds:
"Every week, the fifty or so members of the Prussian Academy gathered in the grand hall of the
Prussian State Library in the heart of Berlin to address each other."
Since November 4 Einstein delivered there four lectures, the last one states: "I had discovered the only
law of gravitation."
Days later Hilbert responded (page 219): "Cordial congratulations" But on November 20 he submitted
for publication to the Gotingen science journal his manuscript "proclaiming his own version of the
equations for general relativity." titled "The Foundations of Physics".
Einstein completed and published his Gravity Physics, known as General Relativity, in November 1915,
post checking if it correctly predicts published, irregular, motions of planet Mercury.

He found total agreement with said astronomical observations, agreement that no other theory had
accomplished before.
30

That was the first obsevational veification of his gravity physics.

About three years later, in 1918-1919, Einstein's gravity field equations were independently confirmed
valid the second time for correctly and excactly predicting gravity-induced, bending of light passing
near a large mass, in this first, British organized sun-eclipse-based test in Australia, later affirmed by
various observations around the globe.

Instant world celebrations followed. But somehing else was at store under the curse of numbers,
which always retards science

misleads some scientists and much of humanity.

1921: A talented Russian mathematician-cosmologists, professor Alexander Friedmann, proved that
Einstein's Field Equations, when applied to the universe, Cannot make it stay stable, it must expand or
contract.
Organized religions around the world strongly protested that Einstein is profundly wrong.

Expanding universe violates the "established and known fact" that earth is the center of the universe.

According to experts, any observer, stationed on any galaxy, would report that all other galaxies are
receding away from him, thus refuting the established truth that earth is the sole center of the entire
universe.

31

When and Why was Einstein realy Horified?

Various hostile protests from around the globe have joined the Claim:
EINSTEIN IS IMPOSTOR OF SCIENCE. EINSTEIN MADE A GREAT MATHEMATICAL MISTAKE. HIS
JEWISHNESS .....

Horified Einstein knew that his GRAVITY PHYSICS equations are universally valid ANYWHERE, ANY TIME,
that they UNEQUIVOCALLY SHINE LIGHT on some dark corners of CULTURE. BUT the terror AND
INSULTS OF ABUSING OPINION words, the RACIAL ONES, THE hate, brutal AND hostile ones, some by

CO-professors, HAVE defeated him to agree to force on his valid equations a simple number to stop
these MAJORITY PROTESTS; THE curse-of-numbers-terror.
Peace THEN returned to SUCH SCIENCE, but not to bona fide science, not to the great AMERICAN
Hubble, who, by STRICT observations, HAS BEEN THE TO FIRST verifY that the universe indeed expands.
TO CONCLUDE
1ST Axiom: Science IS NOT DECIDED BY THE UN, BY A DEMOCRACY, BY ANY MAJORITY, PROTEST,
GOVERNMENT, LAWYERS, EDITORS, JUDGES, RELIGIOUS AUTHORITIES, CELEBRITIES, CONGRESS,
PARTIES, OPINIONS, POLITICAL ''SCIENCE''.
CORROLARY: BONA FIDE scientists MAY BE the deepest religious people on earth, especially when --
beyond adopting this 1st axiom -- avoid PRECISE DEFINITIONS AS CONTENDED NEXT.
_________

Assertion A: Everything in science is connected with everything else, (Plato).
FOR INSTANCE, NOTHING CAN BE ISOLATED FROM GRAVITY.

Assertion B: Precise definitions or axioms may lead to unrepairable errors:
Anything outside a strictly errected axiomatically erected fence-definition is a priori rejected and
lost forever or block unification with Einsteinian deterministic Gravity Physics (general relativity),
relativistic cosmology and our induced philosophy GRAVITISM.

This assertion applies first to the highly respected "Standard Quantum Model", and to "symmetry
breaking" dictums employed there. See TABLE OF CONTENTSOF VOLUME I.

Assertion C: Errorless definitions-axioms begin with 'the whole universe',
32
because there is neither any outside fense around its curved-spacetime-contents, nor to verified
observations of its time asymmetries REDISCUSSED BELOW.

Contention 1: WHEREFORE, precise definitions or axioms only encage, arrest or block ideas by error-
generating ‘fences’ that should a priori be identified, deleted, ignored or comitted to the flames of
history, even if have already been awarded a Nobel Prize.

Contention 2: Until around the mid-Thirties of the previous century, Core Cultural-Curriculum Courses
(in Europe!) were made as ‘scientific’ as possible, and science propped up its foundations by turning to
philosophy. This attitude was in part motivated by the desire to appropriate the sciences with the great
‘prestige’ of philosophers, and for the philosopher the fast-growing ‘status’ of science.

Hence, European professors vied with one another in presenting science based on high
philosophical grounds, and philosophy as a ‘science among sciences’, or even as the
‘sum of the other sciences’.

A ‘PhD’ was then a bona fide Philosophy Doctor, a person of advanced core knowledge
and eloquence outside his specialism. Western academia has since withdrawn from
the game.

Empty specialism has since gained the highest prestige; no longer do professors need
borrow it from philosophy, nor to teach a bona fide CCCC. Indeed, contemporary
professors today vie with one another in presenting fragmented lectures devoid of
interconnected content, for they can no longer hope to achieve popularity by injecting
updated core knowledge into what has gradually become an ever narrower,
disciplinary professionalism.
Assertion 1
This turn of events has resulted in
overvaluation of technical professionalism, With hope of finding the grand
empty academicism, absolutation of ever- outlook of a spacecraft, students
narrower disciplines, and the common enter our universities. Entering
inclination to reject bona fide core knowledge the temples of knowledge they
from the class. A pity. For these trends only settle for that of an eagle, but
push the young into cynicism, nihilism and what they find is that of a
feelings of emptiness in education and society specialist gopher.
at large.

33

The current crisis in education is not subsiding. More than ever before it demands
answers, re-assessments, a revised philosophy and acts: How to administer mutual
interactions instead of linear causality; structured complexity instead of summation of
events; structured historical buildup of facts, instead of summation of isolated events
and narrow academic Departments.
Assertion 2
Although most academic teaching and research must be distributed amongst various
Schools and Departments of a university, there is an objective need to regenerate an
old tradition that cannot be associated with any specialism, because the ideas with
which it deals are common to all studies, or not involved in any.
Assertion 3

Without a guiding-structuring-unifying methodology aimed at gaining an all-
embracing, interconnected knowledge that crosses frozen disciplines, any Core
Curriculum Cultural Course [CCCC] is nothing but a pity encyclopedia displayed
by a specialist nominated by “Organizers” as the “CCCC-Coordinator” who
remains helpless in teaching the alluring beauty of mathematics, physics,
astronomy, history, the life sciences, and comparative religions, but fails to
perceive their profound educational implications as a whole.

Modern skepticism is usually the negation of a core, interconnected,
educational methodology. Not so with Einsteinian skepticism.
Einstein advocated the removal of imposed borders between
traditional disciplines and university departments and faculty;
stating that knowledge is one; its division is human weakness.

Assertion 4

Structuring an all-embracing Core-Outlook is a matter entailing
far more ambiguity than the technicalities of the application of any
disciplinary course and its “Academic Credit Regulations”.
34
The Western crisis, today more than ever before, may be repaired by
resorting to Einsteinian vision, in high-schools and constantly upgraded and
updated for underSuch a

Literary intellectuals at one pole –
at the other scientists,
and as the most representative,
the physical scientists.
. Between the two a gulf of mutual incomprehension –
sometimes (particularly among the young) hostility and dislike,
but most of all lack of understanding.

C. P. Snow, The Two Cultures

Cambridge University Press

Assertion 5

Students are often discouraged by their professors and mentors from

asking fundamental, interdisciplinary questions in class, as a result of
which inconsistent, or outright incorrect premises, are given a better

chance of perpetuating themselves.

Literary intellectuals, the people of
the arts, and most educators, are
currently ignorant of modern
advances in the ‘exact sciences’, of
their mathematical formulations,
experimental, observational and
verification methods. They are likely
to resort to a priori or superficial
35
answers to complex problems whose

detailed implications are beyond them. Similarly, faculty, ‘experts’ and professionals in the “exact
sciences”, via their past, ever-narrowing, disciplinary education, are currently ignorant of the wide-span
knowledge, literature, arts and history that are needed to share their thinking and aspirations with
other thinking persons.
The resulting gap can hardly be bridged despite the fact that our globe is currently an
interconnected village, internationally linked by what might be expected to bridge old gaps between
traditional cultures, languages, religions, political systems and a unified educational philosophy of
humanity. Yet, the facts are that deep divisions keep deepening and deserts of narrow specialism keep
spreading more than ever before.
What was a two-semester half-life of a textbook is today one day or less. Sources of studies are millions
of online blogs with uneven quality and little or no reliable references. A-million-a-day posts confuse
the young; generating one-line thinkers; a tsunami of Tower-of-Babel Kalthure; a kalthure where
scholars secure same weight as one-line thinkers; Eulogies are heard over the smoking ruins of the
classical temples of knowledge – new layers of ruins on top of the destroyed Academy-Library of
Alexandria.
Limitations of Theories and Definitions

There may be something provisional about all current verified scientific theories
They must be re-confirmed by fresh verified information from any sub-field of science,
hence, are subject to constant revision and even replacement; -- in this, each succeeding
generation takes a measurable step beyond the position of its predecessors.

Closely related to the unrestricted content of modern science is its unrestricted
questioning of all earlier convictions in light of verifiable evidence that refutes extant
axioms, definitions, assertions, outlooks and theories.
36

Thus, every item of carefully recorded experimental or observational information is a

proper object for analysis. A drive towards novelty and discovery impels inquiry to
explore all corners of the universe. These tenets are the central pillars of Gravitism. But
there is more to it. The outlook includes constant re-assessments of the theory -- of any
theory -- and analysis of the errors involved as one updates and improves it.
Tarski's Indefinability Theorem

According to this theorem no sufficiently powerful language is strongly-semantically-self-
representational. For instance, any arithmetical truth cannot be defined by arithmetics.
According to Smullyan [42], Tarski's Indefinability Theorem is somewhat superior to the famous Gödel's
Incompleteness Theorems, which are more related to mathematics and less to philosophical, scientific,
and linguistic issues. Tarski's theorem is not directly about mathematics but about the inherent
limitation of any formal language that is strongly-semantically-self-representational when it contains

predicates and function symbols defining the semantic concepts specific to that language.
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem

Gödel [34-43] has demonstrated that conventional mathematics, which we tend to consider as our
supremely logical and consistent system, involves paradoxical, self-referential statements about itself,
i.e., a conventional mathematical system, say, the mathematics of flat space in the Euclidian geometry -
- an ‘absolute stage’ upon which Newtonian gravity and physics stands, can be incomplete because one
has not discovered all its necessary axioms. In other words, no matter how many physico-
mathematical issues theoretical physicists solve, there always will be other issues that cannot be solved
by any known laws of physics; and since these laws constitute a finite set of rules, and are based on
mathematics, Gödel's theorem restricts them.

Even in computer science one cannot create a complete and consistent finite list of axioms, or an
infinite list. Each time one adds a statement as an axiom; there are other correct statements that
cannot be proved, even with the new axiom.
37

Moreover, if the system can prove that it is consistent, it is not. As might have been expected,
this idea has been much debated by mathematical philosophers:

v How can a theory be both correct and unprovable?
v Is mathematics a loop of our mind?
v Is the mind a self referential loop?

Gödel's first incompleteness theorem shows that any system that allows one to define the natural
numbers is necessarily incomplete: it contains statements that are neither provable correct, nor
provably false. Some scholars therefore argue that this refutes the logicism of Gottlob Frege and
Bertrand Russell, who had aimed to reduce/define the natural numbers in terms of logic.

Not all axiom systems satisfy these hypotheses, even when these systems have models that include
natural numbers as a subset. For example, there are axiomatizations of ‘flat’ space that do not meet
the hypotheses of Gödel's theorems.

Another limitation applies only to systems that are used as their own proof systems. Gödel's theorem
has another interpretation in the language of computer science. Theorems are computably

enumerable: one can write a computer program that will eventually generate any valid proof. One can
then ask if it has the stronger property of being recursive:
Can one write a computer program to definitively determine if a statement is true or false?

Gödel's theorem says that you cannot. His theorems, however, are confined to sufficiently strong
axiomatic systems, i.e., that a theory contains enough arithmetic to carry out the proof of the
incompleteness theorem.
Some scholars claim that Gödel's incompleteness theorems have provided a deadly blow to David
Hilbert’s program towards a universal mathematical formalism. Nevertheless, the essence of these
issues is much more complicated, as indicated below.
Undecidable Statements: A statement is neither provable nor refutable. Hence, some scholars resort to
the concept "independent". However, that concept is also ambiguous.
Meta-Language: A sufficiently developed language cannot represent its own semantics. Any meta-
language includes primitive notions, axioms, and rules absent from an object language. Theorems
provable in a meta-language are not provable in the object language.
“Truth”: Some of the aforementioned theorems may presuppose that mathematical "truth" and
"falsehood" are well-defined in an absolute sense, rather than relative. If an axiomatic system can be
proven to be consistent and complete from within itself, then it is inconsistent.
38

Minds and Machines: Gödel's incompleteness theorems may also reflect on human intelligence. While
Gödel's theorems cannot be applied to humans, since they make mistakes and are, therefore,
inconsistent, it may be applied to the domain of science.

Sets of expressions are considered as coded as sets of numbers. For various syntactic properties (such
as a formula, a sentence, etc.), these sets are computable. And any computable set of numbers can be
defined by some arithmetic formula.
There are various additional theorems and sub-theorems 34-49. I do not intend to expand on them in
these pages, for these pages are mainly written for the general reader, without resorting to any
mathematics.

We therefore move next to elaborate on some more practical domains in the mined fields of verifiable
scientific theories and proofs.

“Pure Mathematics” is human attempt to stay aloof and beyond emotions, traditions and ambitions. It
may protect one from making mistakes, prior to and aft writing down any mathematical equation.
How mathematics -- combined with verifiable observations -- help protect the human mind from
falling into unverifiable traditional dictums of ‘intuitively’ generating mistakes? This may be best
demonstrated by the most dramatic event in the history of science; when Einstein lost trust in the most
verified gravity field equations of general relativity3.3, the most accepted theory of the universe,
which harbors no mistake. To correct sociallly accused ‘mistake’, he had to force on this reality,
‘correction number’, wrongly termed a "cosmological constant".

For good reasons stated above Einstein's tensorial gravity field equations were flawless, despite the
fact that a cult has evolved to demand adding this factor to fit its ulterior wishes to operate under
some set of philosophical prejudices.

Most important, the failure to acknowledge this is not only self-delusion, but a failure to attend to the
philosophical base of physics, a failure that leads to empty scientism.

Space-Time vs. Symmetry-Asymmetry

The essence and fundamental meaning of curved space-time, symmetry-asymmetry, statistics and
probabilities are understood only by a portion of scientists. A much smaller portion, or, in fact, a
splendid minority, maintains that probabilities, statistics and quantum postulates provide them with no
‘free will’. [Volume I].
39

Differential Equations vs. Observations

Time-symmetry, reversibility and the symmetrical laws of physics serve us as key tools to better
understand nature, despite the limitations mentioned above. And it is only by combining (conceptual,
reversible, analytic) time-symmetry with (factual, aggregated, observational) time-asymmetry, or by
combining reversible equations with a priori known, factual, initial and boundary conditions, that one
may, mathematically, arrive at a reliable world outlook in agreement with
observations/experimentations.

While symbols and analytical concepts may be symmetric, words and sentences (in order, syntax,
phoneme, form, sound modulation or other modes), or ‘useful’ physico-mathematical equations, are
basically asymmetric. Mathematics, gravitation, symmetry-asymmetry, aggregation, time and
meaningful sentences are coupled. While some minor reservations are justifiable, there is an
overwhelming "word of evidence", derived
from physics, the languages and the studies of linguistics, cybernetics, information and mathematics
that fortifies this contention.
A theory may be a “set of statements”, some of which are taken as valid without proof
(axioms), and others, the theorems, are taken as valid because they are implied by the axioms.
A complete and consistent set of axioms for all mathematics is impossible. "Provable by a theory"
means "derivable from the axioms and primitive notions of the theory, using logic.”
The Popperian Falsification Principle

Sir Karl Popper, has introduced the Falsification Principle about
the ability of mankind to establish what is science and what is non-
science, in addition to what might be ‘true’ within the domain of a given
theory, or a set of ‘facts’, axioms or definitions. [Lecture 4]

Applied mathematics is often used as unverifiable covers to advance
subjectivistic claims, ‘proofs’ and ‘theories’. Lectures 3 and 4, and this
one, illustrate how -- by a priori selecting only the time-asymmetric
40
mathematics, or time-asymmetric mathematical solution that fits with their desired ‘proof’ – scientists
easily fool themselves, and others.

Applied mathematics is the key tool of the ‘exact sciences’. It constitutes a special kind of 'intelligent
thinking’ that is integrated with its ‘universal grammar' -- a sort of critical thinking which has been
partially developed to safeguard our minds from prejudices and inconsistencies. Yet, consistency, by
itself, is a two-sided issue.

‘Pure mathematics’ is often developed for its own sake, without a priori harboring intentional
applications, although they may be ‘un-covered’
According to Einstein, when we predict the behavior of a specific or confined set of natural
phenomena, we usually mean that we have found a ‘constructive theory’ covering this set.
When we find that other sets of phenomena are incompatible with that theory, we tend to either
generalize or modify it, or failing that, seek an alternative one.
To this ‘constructive’ category Einstein opposes the so-called “theories of principles” (exemplified,
according to Einstein, by thermodynamics and the general theory of relativity), whose point of
departure and foundation are not hypothetical constituent, but empirically observed general properties
from which mathematical formulae are deduced so as to apply to
every case of observation which presents itself.
Thus, according to Einstein, the merit of “constructive theories” lies in their comprehensiveness,
adaptability, and clarity for a given set of phenomena, while that of the “theories of principles” -- in
their logical ‘perfection’ and universality and in the vast observational spectrum of their formulation at
any scale and time.
Yet, Einstein did not trust some semi-hidden aspects of his own general theory of relativity2.5. Two such
events are described next:
The failure of statistical mechanics (both classical and quantum) to deduce and explain the origin of
irreversibility, time-asymmetries, cosmic and local structuring, generation of order and what is called
“entropy growth” -- as well as its philosophical and applicative limitations and lack of large-scale
universality -- has been explained in footnotes 2.5, 3.4 and 3.5 as well as in Volume I. (See Table of
Contents,).
Einstein had not suspected that his general theory of relativity already incorporates another ‘theory of
principle’: Thermodynamics, especially the so-called Second Law of Thermodynamic. Namely, the
foundations of thermodynamics should NOT be a separate, stand-alone, theory of science; it should
41
NOT be fragmented from the rest of physics. It constitutes an integral part of gravity-induced,
interconnected, unified physico-philosophical knowledge.
DO armies of gate guards defile our temple of knowledge?
NON-APPEALABLE, COMPUTER DICTUMS BY ARMIES OF NON-SCIENTISTS, INDUCE NEW SCIENCE,

PARTLY CORRUPTED?
Einstein's general relativity and Hilbert spaces may have been lost to humanity by today's red tape that
defiles our temple of theoretical physics?
WHAT kind of science is so smuggled into present and future knowledge?

The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property.
John Locke
Why gravity is the most fundamental integrator of

all studies?
Volume I demonstrates this fact within the studies of physics, astrophysics, astronomy, cosmology
and philosophy, while Lecture 5 extends it to the origin of the sun, earth, life, hominids, writing and
civilization.

We next extend it to gravity- induced sociology and the philosophy of natural selection: The fight for
property-domains-resources, the socio-rules of time-grammar, gravity-induced territorial wars, city and
village structures, transportation systems, aspirations, religions, theology and the arts.
‘Gravity-Induced ‘Natural Selection’

Gravity-induced changes develop territoriality in a given spatial region or in a given assembly of
individuals, especially when key resources are not sufficiently abundant and stable through long
periods of historical times. We observe this phenomenon in both the animal and human domains of
socio- biology.
When a limited terrestrial space is divided into lots in a community, it carries economic and social
“standing”, or "lebensraums", involving "well-defined territories" and "Gravity-induced Natural
Selection"; from animals' mating systems to animals' monopolies on water resources; from natural
food administration to the control of key strategic ridges; from controlling fossil fuel resources to
42
disputes over territories.
One species, or one sex, or one race, may control a larger quantity of resources, say, scarce water
ponds, than the other, until a small percentage of the population monopolizes key resources.
Gravity-induced hills and mountains control castle and village structures and especially tall structures
may become worship temples of the super- natural.

RECAP: Domain-Property and Envy drive competition, company ads, venture capital, TV and academic
rating, political candidates, religious rivalry and key human traits, sometimes stronger than death.
As history testifies, gravity-induced territoriality is often developed into nationality, imperialism and
territorial conquest wars.
Many aspects of animals’ social organization and evolution can be predicted on the basis of gravity-
induced environmental variables. Since biogeochemical evolution causes key natural resources to be
distributed non-uniformly in the spatial and temporal coordinates of the biosphere, resource
monopolization develops in all levels of socio-biological systems.

RECAP from previous Lectures: The first local "aggregates" of matter in the solar system have already
contained gas, supernovae debris, dust, rocks. It was gravity that stratified these compounds in
‘horizontal’ layers according to their “specific gravity”, a term to used below in modified “natural
selection”.

The atmosphere and geological strata are ordered-selected by specific gravity of their chemical
components. It was gravity that put the early components of living systems at one and the same strata
for life to begin.
Gravity is therefore the universal builder of structures, including all chemistry in the cores of
gravitationally pressed-heated stars [Fusion in Lecture 1, CPP], geological strata, earth morphology the
entire evolution of life, village/city structures, transportation systems, linguistic hierarchy, recorded
symbols, letters, grammar vs. time, structure of sentences, pages, books.
Why 'Gravity Selection' is

“Natural selection”?

The origin of temporal behavior in animals can be traced out to gravity-
induced forces. Even “innate patterns" are wrongly dissociated from simple movements in the field of
gravitation, i.e., as "up-ward-downward" balancing
of the biological body vis-à-vis the gravity pointers in each biological cell.
Gravity periodicities around the sun emerge as prime sources of order via time and the arrow of time
43
[Lecture 1].
Gravity-Induced Orientation and Order

Using gravity pointers we say ‘up’, ‘down’, ‘left’, ‘right’ and generate symbols, codes, signs, numbers
and letters for a later use and for other to read.
Animals are also 'conscious' of the commonly-shared "up- down" surroundings, and about "weight"
and acceleration.
Plants also harbor innate sensors that guide them in which direction to grow even on a mountain slope.
Additional examples range from gyroscope inertial changes, balancing machines, heading indicators
and gravity-induced changes involving the fluid in the vertebrate inner ear to a crystallizing suspension
of organic spheres in water.
Gravity-induced Plant Growth and Animal Behavior

The sensing devices which plants and animals use for "gravity perception" ("gravity receptors", "g-
perception", "bio- accelerometers", "gravity- induced biological clocks", etc.) are not yet
well understood, even though a voluminous literature has been published on this subject. But what we
already know justifies the central role we claim gravity plays in living systems and society.
Plants ‘know’ to grow vertically upward when, undisturbed, they start growing in total darkness as
seeds inserted deep into the ground; -- even when they grow on a steep mountain slope.
44
As most high-growing trees they align their growth under the control of the gravity vector.
If a growing higher plant is displaced with respect to the "upright" position, some tens of minutes later
it will adapt its growth in such a way as to restore its original orientation in coincidence with the gravity
vector. (If it is displaced only briefly and then restored to its original orientation well before the growth
response can set in, it still responds to that displacement.)
Gravity-induced orientation-adaptation of an organism may occur when an organism orients itself by a

gravity-induced gradient of density differences or hydrostatic pressure.
Small organisms (including all bacteria) may have no means for sensing gravity, but
they are affected by it. Animals low on the evolutionary scale characteristically exhibit
innate patterns that depend little on learning, and have a lesser adaptability to
changes in the environment.
Consequently, their dependence on heredity-geophysical-gravitational origins is ‘high’ in proportion to

animals that are ‘high’ on the evolutionary scale. While the latter show some signs of innate patterns,
they harbor a greater capacity to produce a much more flexible mechanism to respond to a variety of
other external changes that stimulate them. The evolutionary origin of the so-called "innate ideas"
may, therefore, be external rather than internal.
Even the computer page is ordered by up, bottom, left, right margins and footnotes. And it takes time
to read them and to comprehend them; the time that always advances from past to future; the time
that we term Linguistic Arrow of Time. Similarly, gravity-induced ordering of shelves, files, documents
and books in a library introduces order into our life.
Gravity- Chained Law, Seconds, Minutes, Days, Years

Whole civilizations religions constructed on gravity-induced orientability, concepts, spirituality, art,
music, home structure, wells, canals, trade roads, agriculture, and even law enforcement by hanging.
Such gravity-induced cultural phenomena may proceed beyond grammar and social order into the
spiritual and hierarchical cultures, and have been domains: High priest, low deck, high commissioner,
and highness, heaven, lofty, go to the bottom of the subject, etc. [see below].
Biological Clocks
The origin of temporal behavior in animals can be traced back in time and out to external physical
influences. Gravity and geophysical periodicities thus emerge as prime sources of order and
information in all non-living and living systems.
Animals low on the evolutionary scale depend little on learning, and have a lesser adaptability to
changes in the environment. Consequently, their dependence on heredity-geophysical-gravitational
origins is high in proportion to animals high on the evolutionary scale.
Vertigo, Loss of Coordination-Balancing

45
& Gravity Chains
Biological structures in the inner ear include semicircular canals and a fluid that moves by gravity force,
and activates a system that transmits linear and rotational motions vis-à-vis the gravity vector to the
vestibular nerve, which carries these signals through the brainstem to our brain cerebellum, which, in
turn, uses them to control our balancing, orientation, coordination and movement.
The vestibular system in our ears comprises two semi-circular ‘canals’, which are used to indicate our
rotational movements, and otoliths, which indicate linear translations.

Vertigo is a loss of coordination, balancing and orientation vis-à-vis space and the gravity-
induced horizon.
The vestibular system sends signals primarily to the neural structures that control our eye movements,
and to the Cerebellum-muscles system that keeps us upright and helps maintain clear vision-
orientation vs. the gravity vector.
Biological Cells, Reproduction, Immunity System &

Gravity
Gravity causes changes in cell division, metabolism and the immunity system.
Reproduction is also impaired and the immune cells cannot differentiate into mature cells in low or
zero gravity conditions attainable in space craft.
The size of a biological cell depends on the local gravity vector – its size increases in larger local
gravitational field-force values. Bone cells must attach themselves to something and will die if they
cannot. Without the gravity force- field they float around and perish. When animals evolve on land,
outside the oceans, they develop stronger skeletons to cope with larger gravity forces vis-à- vis the
reduced one due to buoyancy in the waters. Earlier life forms in the oceans were smaller and had a
jellyfish-like configuration. Thus, without strong skeletons, land animals cannot evolve.
Animals and Gravity-Induced Effects

Gravimorphism, gravitropism and tropism are directional movements of a plant with
respect to a directional stimulus. One such tropism is gravimorphism -- the growth or movement of a
plant with respect to gravity. Plant roots grow in the direction of gravity while shoots and stems grow
against it
RECAP: Gravity generates structures and controls all geological layers and global phenomena
ranging from mountain crests, gravity-induced tectonic folds, valleys, beaches, oceans and lagoons, to
springs, wells, swamps, glaciers and rivers, and the bio-systems connected with them.
Without gravity-induced orientation-order and grammar we are lost in any given written language.
Gravity-induced grammar prevents us from vertical reversals. Similarly, horizontal reversals prevent us,
46
say, from reversals of W to M. There are more complicated gravity-induced grammar rules. They range
from preventing reversal of past into future, and vice versa, to use gravity-induced structures as
reference: A mountain crest, valley, beach line, river bed, sky, earth, ocean, etc.
Gravity-sensing cells function as detectors of the direction of gravity. The fluid-particles systems
inside cells initiate inner convective currents that cease under zero gravity. Thus, the absence of gravity
affects the contacts of cells via their membrane potential and their cytoskeletons
Gravity-Induced
Village and City
Structures
Gravity generates structures, controls all
geological layers and global phenomena
ranging from mountain crests, tectonic
folds, geological uplifts, valleys, village &
city structures, transportation systems,
oceans and lagoons, to springs, wells,
swamps, glaciers, rivers, and related
ecological-systems.

Gravity v. Global Warming v. Health
The evolution and everyday functioning of our bones, legs, hips, joints, cartilages, ligaments, femurs,
tibia, pelvis and muscles, has been "in response" to the force and direction of gravity.
Gravity plays a key factor in hygiene and in heart failure associated with swollen legs, in flooded lungs,
walking, sleeping needs, etc.
Nevertheless, the cardinal role gravity plays in the treatment of gravity-induced

disorders in biological systems, human perception, health and longevity, has been
largely overlooked by health providers and researchers, partly because the key role of
gravity as the universal generator of all socio-gravity-dynamics, has not yet been well
understood and investigated.
The Crisis inside the Sciences

A note: Chairing the 1969 International Conference on Classical and Relativistic Thermodynamics, I
invited Prigoigine to preset his much published thermodynamic theory about what he has claimed to
47
be the universal origin of irreversibility in nature – namely, on the origin of the
2nd law of thermodynamics. But in his FORMULATIONS I discovered a fundamentaL MISTAKE THAT
HE IS Intentionally HIDING. Thus we had an uneasy talk there about the validity of his worldwide
acclaimed thermo, so much that I had to prevent him to present a misleading theory and formulation
there.
The issue was raised again in 1974 at the State University of New York in Buffalo, post his invited
lecture there. While Prigogine could not object my proofs of his mistake in his thermo, he was awarded
the NOBEL PRIZE FOR WRONG AAND MISLEADING THERMODYNAMICS, TIME ARROW AND THE
ASYMMETRY OF NATURE:

Conservation and voids expansion cause asymmetry – v. his wrong mathematics
which provides no proof of the origing of nautre asymmetry for he starts his "theory"
with symmetric mathematics that never can correctly be changed to a asymmetrical
mathematics (unless one smuggles-in the results without declaring the contraband.)

In fact, if he claims that he discovered a great proof of science, this very fact is the
proof that his proof is not a proof, to say the least.
Same with asymmtery.

Prediction is fundamentally symmetric with

retrodiction

If a priori one selects only prediction, and rejects retrodiction, one fools
himeself that a proof has been made. If one sales such a proof to fellow
scientists, the proof does not even rise to the level of being scientifically
wrong.
Initial conditions are also symmetric with final conditions. If one a priori
selects only initial conditions, one fools himself that a proof was made, and
again, the conclusion is as stated above. YET THE NOBEL AWARD MEMBER
DID NOT EVEN OPEN TO READ MY 3 DECADES OBJECTIONS.

VARIOUS CLAIMS RESORT TO Linguistics foolings
EXAMPLE: "the particles were "un-correlated" BEFORE AND "correlated" AFT, therefore …., or other
linguistic manipulations that had been well-reviewed and published as articles of top science proofs.
48

This includes the semi-sacrosact "Boltzman Theorem", and endless statistical and
quantum theories thar are claimed "proofs".

Some 'SYMMETRY BREAKING' crown string and similar attempts to unify the standard
quantum model with Einsten's deerministic gravity physics..

To conclude: Prigogine was indeed a great impostor in hiding his stealthy smuggling of asymmetry
into his equations aimed to sale his 'proofs' to empty-head periodical editors, to the public, to endless
awards-people and tto their friends. H This way he got the Nobel.

REFERENCES and Notes

Isaacson Walter, "Einstein, His Life and Universe", SIMON & SCHUSTER PAPERBACKS, 2007, pages 214-
221, 551 are important sourccess FFORR THE TIMEE MAAGAZINE TO declare EINSTEIN IS THE
Person of the Century: Why We Chose Einstein, January 3, 2000.
Post the first Relativistic Thermodynamics Conference, in Pittsburgh, Pa, and a few publications [4-6] --
Einstein's memorial supporters in the U.S. approached the author, proposing to fund handling, editing
& publishing of Einstein's Life and scientific Records [3]. But due to research-teaching loads the thankful
and grateful response included a respectful proposal to transfer this great memorial and historical task
to the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, as done.

Main Publication list by and on Albert Einstein:
Folgerungen aus den Capillaritätserscheinungen (Conclusions Drawn from the Phenomena of
Capillarity), Ann. Phys. 4: 513 (1901); A. Einstein, On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production
and Transformation of Light, ibid, 17: 132 (1905); A. Einstein, new determination of molecular
dimensions, PhD thesis (April 30, 1905); A. Einstein, On the Motion Required by the Molecular Kinetic
Theory of Heat of Small Particles Suspended in a Stationary Liquid, (Brownian Motion), ibid., 17: 549–
560 (1905); A. Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, (on Special Relativity) Ibid, 17: 891
(1905); A. Einstein, Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content?, (on Mass-Energy
equivalence), Ibid, 19: 639 (1905); A. Einstein, On the Influence of Gravity on the Propagation of Light,
ibid, 35: 898 (1911); A. Einstein, ibid. 10, 195 (1909); ibid. 10, 323 (1909); W. Ritz, (Wrongly Attacking
Einstein’s Origin of Electromagnetic Irreversibility), Phys. Z. 9, 903 (1908); A. Einstein, Die
Feldgleichungen der Gravitation (The Field Equations of Gravitation), Koniglich Preussische Akademie
der Wissenschaften: 844 (1915); A. Einstein, Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen
Relativitätstheorie (Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity), Koniglich
Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften (1917); A. Einstein, Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung (On
49
the Quantum Mechanics of Radiation)", Physikalische Zeitschrift 19: 121 (1917); A. Einstein, Nobel
Lectures, Physics 1901–1921, Amsterdam: Elsevier (1923); A. Einstein, Quantentheorie des einatomigen
idealen Gases (Quantum theory of monatomic ideal gases) Sitzungsberichte der Preussichen Akademie
der Wissenschaften Physikalisch—Mathematische Klasse: 261 (1924); A. Einstein, Die Ursache der
Mäanderbildung der Flussläufe und des sogenannten Baerschen Gesetzes (On meanders in the courses
of rivers) Die Naturwissenschaften 14: 223 (1926); A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Nathan, Can
Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?", (The EPR Paradox)
Physical Review, 47 (10): 777 (1935); A. Einstein, Lens-Like Action of a Star by the Deviation of Light in
the Gravitational Field, Science 84, 506 (1936) (Gravitational Lens, Einstein Rings); A. Einstein, On
Science and Religion, Nature 146: 605 (1940); A. Einstein, et al. To the editors, New York Times (4
December 1948); On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation, Scientific American (4): 13 (1950); E.
Hubble, A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra-Galactic Nebulae, Proc., Nat.
Acad. of Sciences (U.S.), Vol. 15, Iss. 3, (1929); A. Einstein and L. Infeld,, The World As I See It (1934); A.
Einstein, The Evolution of Physics, (1938); Out

of My Later Years (1950); A. Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton University Press (1956); A.
Friedman, A: Über die Krümmung des Raumes, Z. Phys. 10 377 (1922), (English translation: Gen. Rel.
Grav. 31, 1991 (1999); A. Alain, D., Jean and R., Gérard,
Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers,
Phys. Rev. Letters, 49 (25) (1982): Nobel Foundation, Albert
Einstein — Biography; D. Howard and J. Stachel, Einstein: The
Formative Years, 1979-1909, Springer (2000); P. A. Schilpp (Ed.),
Albert Einstein — Autobiographical Notes, Open Court Publishing
(1979); P. A. Schilpp, (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist,
Harper Torchbook (1951); R. Clark, Einstein: The Life and Times,
Harper-Collins (1984); F. Golden, Person of the Century: Albert
Einstein, Time (Jan 3, 2000); About Zionism: Speeches and Lectures
by Professor Albert Einstein (1930); Why War? (1933, with Sigmund
Freud); P. Galison, Einstein's Clocks: The Question of Time; A. Pais,
Subtle is the Lord. The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Oxford
University Press (1982); J. Crelinsten, Einstein's Jury: The Race to Test Relativity, Princeton University
Press (2006); H. Kant, Albert Einstein and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physics in Berlin; J. Renn, (Ed),
Albert Einstein — Chief Engineer of the Universe: One Hundred Authors for Einstein, Wiley-VCH. (2005);
J. Schmidhuber, Albert Einstein (1979–1955) and the 'Greatest Scientific Discovery Ever' (2006); Einstein
archive at the Instituut-Lorentz, NL; G., Goettling, Einstein's refrigerator, Georgia Tech Alumni
Magazine (1998); U.S. Patent 1,781,541 , Albert Einstein and Leó Szilárd (refrigerator), November 11,
1930; Brian, Dennis Einstein: A Life, New York: John Wiley & Sons (1996); Helen Dukas and Banesh
Hoffman (eds) Albert Einstein, The Human Side, Princeton University Press (1981); A. Einstein, The
World as I See It. New York: Philosophical Library Albert (1949); Zionism and Israel Information Center,
Albert Einstein and Zionism; American Museum of Natural History (2002), Einstein's Revolution; Rowe,
David E.; Schulmann, Robert, Einstein on Politics: His Private Thoughts and Public Stands on
Nationalism, Zionism, War, Peace, and the Bomb, Princeton University Press (2007); Einstein Archives,
History of the Estate of Albert Einstein, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (2007); Princeton Online
50
Einstein in Princeton: Scientist, Humanitarian, Cultural Icon, Historical Society of Princeton;J. Stachel, et
al, (Eds.) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vols. 1–10, Princeton University Press; The Atomic
Heritage Foundation, Einstein’s Famous Letter to the U.S. President about the need to survive by
developing the atomic bomb before the Germans would do it;
1. Person of the Century: Why We Chose Einstein, Time, (3 January 2000).
2. Gal-Or Benjamin, Entropy, Fallacy, and the Origin of Irreversibility: An Essay on the Einsteinian New
Astrophysical Revolutionary School of Thermodynamics; Annal. N.Y. Acad. Acad. Sci., 196 (A6) 305
(1972) Awarded the Gold Medal, while allegedly a rival article by S. Hawking did not make it.
3. Gal-Or Benjamin, on cosmological origin of thermodynamics, Nature 230, 1971); 234, 217 (1971);
4. Gal-Or Benjamin, On The Origin of Irreversibility, Science, 176, 11 (1972); 178, 119 (1972);
5. Gal-Or Benjamin, Found. Phys. 6, 407 (1976); 6, 623 (1976); 7, 50 (1977);
6. Gal-Or Benjamin, Cosmology, Physics and Philosophy (CPP), Volumes I and II, Springer Verlag, New
York, 1981, 1983, 1987, Volumes I and 2 in 522-page, Hard-Cover worldwide acclaimed book, based on
Refers. 5 to 10; "Gravitism", "Havayism", '"The New Astrophysical School" , still in high demand
nowdays.
7. Gamov's book on the expanding universe. As undergraduate student I read there about Einstein's
background, his field equations and apparently Gomov's predictions about 270 degrees below zero C
cosmic voids between all galaxies receding away from each other – expanding voids that rule
intergalactic dark cold spaces between all galaxies and the OLBERSE PARADOX RE WHY THE NIGHT SKY
IS SO DRK AND COLD? And the affrmation of the expanding voids by Hubble – extensive reading tht had
caused a serch for physical links between the voids-expansion aand non-expanding stars and gaalaxies,
Gravity Physics and the asymmetric 2nd law of thermodynamics. References 5 to 10.
Associted facts: With that conviction I refuted Mr. S. Zeidman's final "Thermo Exam", claiming the
2nd law of Thermodynamics is based on dissipating radiated energy from stars & galaxies into
expanding, cold dark space, a claim that he considered a bad joke, and failed me, only to cause a
scandal at the Technion, claiming a Dr. Degree should not be granted due to said FAILURE TO PASS HIS
"THERO EXAM" in 1957. At that time, in 1963/4, the cosmic background radiation was discovered,
proving not only the prediction, but overthrowing the steady-state theory of Fred Hoyle, Herman Bondi
and Tommy Gold. My contested thermo was thus presented before a committee headed by Professors
William "Bill" Resnick and Reuel Shinaar. Dr. Degree was next granted with "Flying Colors".
11. Gal-Or Benjamin, "Vectored Propulsion, Supermaneuverability and Robot Aircraft, Springer Verlag,
1989, 1990, still in high demand.

THE BRAVE HYPATIA OF ALEXANDRIA

11.

A. Fitzgerald, Letter of Synesius of Cyrene to Hypathia, London, (1926); Grand Commentaire, de Théon
d'Alexandrie aux 'Tables faciles' de Ptolémée, Livre II, III, Vatican City, 1985, 1991; Commentaries de
Pappus et de Théon d'Alexandrie sur l'Almageste Tome III. Théon d'Alexandrie, Rome, 19; The
calculation of an eclipse of the sun according to Theon of Alexandria, in Proceedings of the
International Congress of Mathematicians, 1, 209-219, (1950), Providence, 1952; Marinus de Naplouse
- un commentaire au 'Petit commentaire' de Théon, Janus 63 (1-3), 167-194, 1976; Théon d'Alexandrie
et les 'Tables faciles' de Ptolémée, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci. 35 (114-115, 106-123) 1985; 'Commentaire
à l'Almageste' de Théon d'Alexandrie, Antiquité Classique, 56, 201-219, 1987; O. Neugebauer, A history
51
of ancient mathematical astronomy, New York, (1975); A. Khan, Hypatia; Authorhouse, (2001); K.
Chares, Hypatia: New Foes with an Old Face, Kessinger Publishing, (1997); A. Margaret, Hypatia’s
Heritage: A history of Women in Science from Antiquity Through the Ninetheenth Century; I. Mueller,
L.S. Grinstein & P. J. Campbell Women of Mathematics: A Biobibliographic Sourcebook. New York:
Greenwood Press, (1987); M. M. Mangasarian,. The Martyrdom of Hypatia, (1915); J. Bregman,
Synesius of Cyrene: Philosopher-bishop. Berkley: University of California Press (1982); M. B. Ogilvie,
Women in science: Antiquity through the nineteenth century. MIT Press, (1986); Hypatia - Physics,
culture and sense of duty, Spanish university (2006); T L. Heath, A History of Greek Mathematics,
Oxford, (1921); W. Müller, Das isoperimetrische Problem im Altertum mit einer übersetzung der
Abhandlung des Zenodoros nach Theon von Alexandrien, Sudhoffs Arch. 37 (1953), 39-71, (1953); P.
Pingree, An illustrated Greek astronomical manuscript: Commentary of Theon of Alexandria on the
'Handy tables' and scholia and other writings of Ptolemy concerning them, J. Warburg, Courtauld Inst.,
45, 195 (1982); Reports by the Department of Mathematics, St. Andrews University in Scotland; Carl
Sagan, Cosmos; Maria Dzielska, Hypatia of Alexandria; Hypathia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy;
Wessel, Susan. Cyril of Alexandria and the Nestorian Controversy: The Making of a Saint and a Heretic.
Oxford, 2004.

52

Parpar: by Benjamin Gal-Or, All Rights Reserved

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Parpar: by Benjamin Gal-Or, All Rights Reserved

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

By Benjamin Gal-Or, All Rights Reserved

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS:

He emphasizes that all scientists operate under some set of philosophical

His work is challenging on many levels, constituting a review 'with derivations' of

Cosmology, Physics and Philosophy

1.1.1 Science Order: Cosmology to Quantum or in Reverse..... 3

1.1 Gravitation, Asymmetry and Structure of Earth v. Cosmos ..80

1.3 Supernova, Gravitational Collapse,

1.7 How Are Cosmic Distances Measured? ……………….….. 116

From Old Physics

2.1 Aim and Scope ……………………………………………. 138

General Relativity and Relativistic Cosmology

3.1 Introduction …………………………………………………....... 167

3.5 From General Relativity to Unified Field Theories ………….…. 205

From Physics to Philosophical Crossroads and Back

Crisis in the Standard Quantum Model

Gravitation & Cosmology unpredictable by Quantum Model

5.1 Preliminary Review …………………………………….……...... 255

and Super-Symmetry …………………………………….................. 272

5.6.2 From Weinberg-Salam Theory to

5.6.2.2 Global, exact, approximate, isotopic and SU(3) symmetries 274

From Physics to Cosmological Crossroads and Back

6.1 FIRST: Reduction of Thermodynamics to Gravitation ...,... 277

The Cosmological Base of Time Arrow

7.1 Time: The All-Embracing Concept …………………................. 309

Black Holes v. Unattainable "Theory of Everything"

8.1 Introduction ………………………………………...… 330

Beyond Present Knowledge

9.1 The Futile Quest for Final Answers …………………...... 349

Sitting, from left:

Perfection of means and confusion of goals, seem – in my opinion – to

characterize our age. ----- Albert Einstein

Nobel Laureate RICHARD FEYNMAN:

“You should not fool the layman when you’re talking as a

Before Einstein left Hitler’s Germany to the United States, a

Einstein's "Anti-Pomposity"; Anti-"Politically Correct"

let them meet me as I am dressed and work in my house.

resorting to undetectable, DARK ENERGY speculations claimed today

by armies of bored physists.

The second, accelerating, expansion of intergalactic voids, Fig. 1,

causes the observed galaxies-clustering into FILAMENTS around each

intergalactic expanding voids, Fig. 1 and 2.

It is a late simultaneous expansion of the universe. It has become

significant in reversing the slowing down by gravity of the geneal

FIG. 2: Revised cosmology-physics-philosophy DICTIONNARY

"RADIATION ENERGY DENSITY" vs. "DISTANCE" defines "DIRECTION OF NET RADIATION

to the "2nd COSMOLOGICAL ARROW", that represents "EXPANDING SPACE "1"

• THE MASTER OF TIME ASYMMTEIES

• THE ROOT CAUSE OF OUR 2ND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

• THE SOLE ASYMMETRIC FUNDAMENTAL LAW IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS.

Fig. 3: SPACE-"2" wraps all

irreversibly dissipate in SUPER-COLD,

All images from author's Volume-I or Wikipedia.

Zooming back to 1 Million ly reveals: Our SPACE-2 "Neighborhood”, which is home to

Fig. 8: NEXT TO 10 MLY WE OBSERVE 'OUR' VIRGO PRIOR TO ALOCATING IT AT 100

STELLAR EVOLUTION SUBJECT to

Subject to momentum conservation, like in opposing rockets in space, the super-fast

border-sharing-voids from each other, collectively providing extra expansion-

Wheeler-Feynman static-space-theory should be redefined for two simultaneous

On page 215 Issaacson explains:

On page 214 Isaacson adds:

Limitations of Theories and Definitions

Thus, every item of carefully recorded experimental or observational information is a