Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Delinquency
Submitted by
S. MOHANA LAKSHMI.
MSW 1ST YR
Submitted To
MR. RAKESH
LECTURER
SOCIALWORK DEPARTMENT
SYNOPSIS
• INTRODUCTION
• DEFINITION
• JUVENILE DELINQUENCY
• PREVALENCE
• THEORITAL CAUSS
• CONSEQUENCES TO SOCIETY
• RISK FACTORS
• INTERVEN2TION
• LAWS
• PREVENTION
• CONCLUSION
• BIBLIOGRAPHY
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION
JUVENILE DELINQUENCY
20% of all children and youth are at some time officially delinquent.
THEORETICAL CAUSES
Povertyyouth
Many
are forced
into
delinquent
activities
because of a
social
disadvantage
.
RATIONAL CHOICE
Classical criminology stresses that causes of crime lie within the individual
offender, rather than in their external environment. For classicists, offenders are
motivated by rational self-interest, and the importance of free will and personal
responsibility is emphasised. Rational choice theory is the clearest example of this
approach.
SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION
Studies also show only 16 in every 100 kids will do something bad opposed to
adult 26 in 100 will do something bad or illegal.
STRAIN
Strain theory is associated mainly with the work of Robert Merton. He felt that
there are institutionalized paths to success in society. Strain theory holds that crime is
caused by the difficulty those in poverty have in achieving socially valued goals by
legitimate means. [1] As those with, for instance, poor educational attainment have
difficulty achieving wealth and status by securing well paid employment, they are
more likely to use criminal means to obtain these goals. Merton's suggests five
adaptations to this dilemma:
A difficulty with strain theory is that it does not explore why children of low-
income families would have poor educational attainment in the first place. More
importantly is the fact that much youth crime does not have an economic motivation.
Strain theory fails to explain violent crime, the type of youth crime which causes most
anxiety to the public.
SUBCULTURAL
The theory of Differential association also deals with young people in a group
context, and looks at how peer pressure and the existence of gangs could lead them
into crime. It suggests young people are motivated to commit crimes by delinquent
peers, and learn criminal skills from them. The diminished influence of peers after
men marry has also been cited as a factor in desisting from offending. There is strong
evidence that young people with criminal friends are more likely to commit crimes
themselves. However it may be the case that offenders prefer to associate with one
another, rather than delinquent peers causing someone to start offending. Furthermore
there is the question of how the delinquent peer group became delinquent initially.
LABELING
Labeling theory states that once young people have been labeled as criminal
they are more likely to offend. (Eadie & Morley: 2003 p.552) The idea is that once
labelled as deviant a young person may accept that role, and be more likely to
associate with others who have been similarly labelled. (Eadie & Morley: 2003 p.552)
Labelling theorists say that male children from poor families are more likely to be
labelled deviant, and that this may partially explain why there are more lower-class
young male offenders. (Walklate: 2003 p. 24)
MALE PHENOMENON
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
GANG INVOLVEMENT
Gangs often
engage in
illegal
monetary
activities
and are
committed
to criminal
orientations.
Public and Private Vandalism
These are
malicious and
deliberate
defacement or
destruction of
both public and
private property.
It often territorial
and designed to
show ownership.
CONSEQUENCES TO SOCIETY
FAMILY ENVIRONMENT
Family factors which may have an influence on offending include; the level of
parental supervision, the way parents discipline a child, parental conflict or
separation, criminal parents or siblings, parental abuse or neglect, and the quality of
the parent-child relationship (Graham & Bowling: 1995 p.33) Children brought up by
lone parents are more likely to start offending than those who live with two natural
parents, however once the attachment a child feels towards their parent(s) and the
level of parental supervision are taken into account, children in single parent families
are no more likely to offend then others. (Graham & Bowling: 1995 p.35) Conflict
between a child's parents is also much more closely linked to offending than being
raised by a lone parent. (Walklate: 2003 p. 106) If a child has low parental
supervision they are much more likely to offend. (Graham & Bowling: 1995) Many
studies have found a strong correlation between a lack of supervision and offending,
and it appears to be the most important family influence on offending. (Farrington:
2002 p.610) (Graham & Bowling: 1995 p.38) When parents commonly do not know
where their children are, what their activities are, or who their friends are, children are
more likely to truant from school and have delinquent friends, each of which are
linked to offending. (Graham & Bowling: 1995 p.45,46) A lack of supervision is
connected to poor relationships between children and parents, as children who are
often in conflict with their parents may be less willing to discuss their activities with
them. (Graham & Bowling: 1995 p.37) Children with a weak attachment to their
parents are more likely to offend. (Graham & Bowling: 1995 p.37)
INTERVENTION
Delinquency Court seeks to provide for the protection and safety of the public and
the minor who has come in contact with the court
SCHOOLS
Special facilities that seeks to provide the structure, safety and supervision for
delinquent youths.
COMMUNITIES
FAMILIES
Families need to
be able to provide
appropriate
behavior control,
models, and
support
throughout
adolescence and
into adulthood
INCIDENCE OF CRIMES COMMITTED BY JUVENILE
• The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (as amended and retitled in
1986)
• The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
• Juvenile Justice Act, 1986
• The Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1988
• The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights
and Full Participation) Act, 1995
• Prevention of Beggary Acts (State Acts)
DELINQUENCY PREVENTION
Delinquency Prevention is the broad term for all efforts aimed at preventing
youth from becoming involved in criminal, or other antisocial, activity. Increasingly,
governments are recognizing the importance of allocating resources for the prevention
of delinquency. Because it is often difficult for states to provide the fiscal resources
necessary for good prevention, organizations, communities, and governments are
working more in collaboration with each other to prevent juvenile delinquency.
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
http://planningcommission.gov.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/9th/vol2/v2c3-10.htm
30/10/2009
Madan G.R [2002] Indian Social Problems (Vol 1) Allied Publishers Pvt Ltd
http://www.slideshare.net/farizahj/juvenile-delinquency 24/10/2009
www.wikipedia.com
www.directesssays.com
www.encyclopedia.com
www.wisegeek.com