Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • One For All. All For One: Collective Security U/ Lon - Vs - Un

    Transféré par

    prasenajita2618
    27 vues1 page
    This document summarizes and compares different approaches to collective security and defense, as well as international security theories. It discusses the limitations of the League of Nations approach to collective security versus the United Nations approach. It also contrasts collective security, which aims for concerted international action, with an ad hoc approach to regional defense agreements. The document then briefly outlines several international relations theories that inform different perspectives on security, including realism, liberalism, feminist theory, critical theory, social constructivism, and post-structural/modern theories. It notes how each views the means and ends of security differently. In closing, it mentions some non-traditional threats to security like identity politics and new types of

    Description originale:

    fjgr

    Titre original

    11

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formats disponibles

    PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    This document summarizes and compares different approaches to collective security and defense, as well as international security theories. It discusses the limitations of the League of Nations approach to collective security versus the United Nations approach. It also contrasts collective security, which aims for concerted international action, with an ad hoc approach to regional defense agreements. The document then briefly outlines several international relations theories that inform different perspectives on security, including realism, liberalism, feminist theory, critical theory, social constructivism, and post-structural/modern theories. It notes how each views the means and ends of security differently. In closing, it mentions some non-traditional threats to security like identity politics and new types of

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    27 vues1 page

    One For All. All For One: Collective Security U/ Lon - Vs - Un

    Transféré par

    prasenajita2618
    This document summarizes and compares different approaches to collective security and defense, as well as international security theories. It discusses the limitations of the League of Nations approach to collective security versus the United Nations approach. It also contrasts collective security, which aims for concerted international action, with an ad hoc approach to regional defense agreements. The document then briefly outlines several international relations theories that inform different perspectives on security, including realism, liberalism, feminist theory, critical theory, social constructivism, and post-structural/modern theories. It notes how each views the means and ends of security differently. In closing, it mentions some non-traditional threats to security like identity politics and new types of

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 1

    Liberal alternative BoP (WWilson) [Nehruk↓] Collective Security u/ LoN_vs_UN

    One for all. All for one (Assured state of peace) LoN: 1st ExpT several limitations & u/Charter no
    Security Single state alone Collective concern clearity to determine Act of Aggresion
    ****Sec by concerted action w/ agreemt of all Every state has veto power, US USSR - out
    Britain France - No Faith, Status Quo maintn
    CS:institutionalizedBoP more universal in nature UN: smaller body UNSCeasy consensus
    BoP: Ad Hoc, work@regional level Not working as expected ex. Syria, P2vsP3
    both- Greater power is antidote to power +ve eg. 1991 Iraq,s invasion in Kuwait
    - Revevance of Hard Power in IP
    CS in Post Cold War Era
    Collective Security_vs_Defence •more Intra state conflict
    India: No need of Separate defence pact •NewType of wars:Low Intensity war-Terr,cyber
    shows no trust in CS
    USA: No conflict b/w the 2 RWP: Set of criteria (last resort, ::, BoConseqS)
    •A.51 UN Charter recog. R2Self Defence to be taken into a/c b4 UNSC mandates any use
    •CD is only way, Practical Sence of military force

    MIMP value, Man created SocSystem4Sec


    (Hobbes-Levithn) IR theories=SecTheories

    Instru: Realism, Lib


    Reflexivist/norm: Feminist, critical, SoCTV,
    Poststructural/modern, Copenhegan School

    Realist: M: Military :: End: Security


    Lib: M:CS, Reg.Sec, EIntdep Sec of Market

    Feminist: State Human Centric Appr.


    Enloe: Nowhere Gend
    perspective hegemonic as
    in case of Sec Concern
    Gendered Sec as an
    altern to National Sec:
    • Demilitarisation
    • Strengthening RoLaw
    • Civilian control over security

    Critical School: Andrew Linklater

    SoConstV: SCV=realist construction


    IP structure: Ideational materialistic
    Sec isuue-type culture carrying 
    It is unfortunate that we look security in the
    worst sense of terms. Shd build New Shared •Non-traditional Threats
    Knowledge- Comm, Recipr, Assurance •anachronism and identity politics
    •‘new wars’—a mixture of war, organized crime,
    Post Struct/modern/Copenhegon school: and massive violations of human rights
    Speech Act- exceptional measure > normal
    Politicians Securatize & Desecuratize
    Comm.Disease/Accidents > Terrorism
    look into -Who, What, Whom it is referred????

    Barry Buzan(Copen):
    Compartmentalize
    ∫ View -
    National (Mili, Poli, Soc),
    Global (Econ, Ecological),
    Human (Migration)

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi