REV 05 (Revised Date : 18/4/2019) PG: 1/1

FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY

SUPERVISOR EVALUATION FORM PSM I
NAME OF STUDENT
ACADEMIC
STUDENT MATRIX NO.
SESSION
DEPARTMENT/ COURSE

TITLE OF PROJECT

NAME OF SUPERVISOR

A. PROJECT EXECUTION Score / Percentage

Logbook Progress (LO3)

Logbook is consistently updated, 14 weeks monitored and officially verified with
4
supervisor’s signature.
Logbook is regularly updated, (10-13) weeks monitored and officially verified with
3
supervisor’s signature.
Logbook is sometimes updated, (5-9) weeks monitored and officially verified with
2
supervisor’s signature.
Logbook is very rarely updated (< 4 weeks) monitored and officially verified with
1
supervisor’s signature.
No progress or Logbook is not submitted. 0
Score /4%
Organization (LO3)
Information is very well organized. 3
Information is well organized. 2
Information is somewhat organized. 1
Information is disorganized. 0
Score /3%
Presentation of information (LO3)
Logbook is well details, providing an in depth look into the project by presenting in a variety
of ways including most of the following methods: Mind map, chart, diagram, table and 3
graph.

An appropriate amount of detail is used to explain the activity by presenting in a variety of

2
ways including a few of the following methods: Mind map, chart, diagram, table and graph.

Details is insufficiently illustrates in a variety of ways including one or two of the following
1
methods: Mind map, chart, diagram, table and graph.
Score /3%
SUB-TOTAL A / 10%
B. GENERAL CONDUCT Score / Percentage

Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill (LO2)

Student independently identifies and analyses problem, proposes creative solutions and
2
chooses appropriate strategies to solve the problem with good justification.

Student has slight idea of identifying the problems and needs a lot of assistance to solve it. 1

Score /2%
Discussion and Contribution of Ideas (LO2)
Very effective discussion with supervisor. Student proposes ideas with a high degree of
3
clarity
Effective discussion with supervisor. Student able to propose ideas. Student contributions
2
add to richness to the project.
Less effective discussion with supervisor. Student proposes ideas with limited clarity.
1
Student contribution did not add any richness to the project.
Student has no effort to contribute ideas. 0
Score /4%
Communication and Interpersonal Skill (LO4)
Student able to explain clearly, listen and response effectively. 1
Student able to explain clearly, listen and response accordingly. 0.5
Student unable to explain clearly and response. 0
Score /2%
SUB-TOTAL B / 6%
C. REPORT WRITING AND SUBMISSION Score / Percentage

Introduction (LO1)
Consists of information regarding project background, project justification and organization
4
presented in precise and well organized structure.
Consists of information regarding project background, project justification and organization
3
presented in well organized structure.
Consists of information regarding project background, project justification and organization
2
which correctly stated.
Consists of information regarding project background, project justification and organization
1
which poorly stated.
Introduction is not provided or is plagiarized 0
Score /4%
Objectives and Scope (LO1)
Objectives are very clear and realistic. Scopes are very well defined. 3
Objectives are clear. Scopes are well defined. 2
Objectives are unclear. Scopes are defined. 1
Objectives and scope are not explained or are plagiarized. 0
Score /3%
Problem Statement (LO1)
Problem are well defined, described and the project purpose is explained. 3
Problem are defined and described with less clarity and the project purpose is explained with
2
limitations.
Problem are poorly defined and described with less clarity and the project purpose is
1
explained with limitations.
Problem are not explained or are plagiarized. 0
Score /3%
Literature Review Content (LO2)
The collection of comprehensive and timely information from various sources has relevance
4
and good quality with a very satisfactory number.
The collection of relevant information and from different sources with a satisfactory number. 3
Gathering information from limited resources and minimal enthusiasm in selecting quality
2
materials.
The collection of information that is not relevant, low quality and limited resources. 1
Score /4%
Relevance of Literature (LO2)
The connection between literature and problem statement, objectives and scopes are very
4
clear. The connections between all aspects are very well written.
The connection between literature and problem statement, objectives and scopes are clear.
3
The student is able to connect the aspects well.
The connection between literature and problem statement, objectives and scopes are
2
somehow clear. Ability to connect the aspects are of low clarity.
The connection between literature and problem statement, objectives and scopes are not
1
clear. Not able to show connection between all aspects.
Score /4%
Methodology (LO3)
The connection between methodology and problem statement, objectives and scopes are very
5
clear. The connections between all aspects are very well written.
The connection between methodology and problem statement, objectives and scopes are
4
clear. The student is able to connect the aspects well.
The connection between methodology and problem statement, objectives and scopes are
3
somehow clear. Ability to connect the aspects is of low clarity.
The connection between methodology and problem statement, objectives and scopes are not
2
clear. Not able to show connection between all aspects.
Methodology of the study is too weak 1
Score /5%
Commercialization Relevency/Contribution to society(LO4)
Have potential for commercialization and easily adapted by industry or society. 0.5
No potential to be commercialized or contribute to society 0
Score /0.5%
Preliminary Results (LO4)
Result is analyzed or hypothesis discussion is comprehensively discussed. 1
Result is moderately analyzed or hypothesis is moderately discussed. 0.5
Result is poorly analyzed or hypothesis is unclear 0
Score /1%
References(LO2)
Most reference sources are recent ( ≤ 5 years) and follow standard format or referencing.
2
Sufficient number of references quoted.
Acceptable reference sources and follows standard or referencing. 1.5
Limited number of references with minor referencing format error. 1
Poor reference sources and incorrect referencing format. 0.5
Score /2%
Report Format and Writing Skill (LO4)

Report is well written but occasionally some points are not easy to understand. Some
0.5
grammatical errors present. Some points on Standard format is not followed.
Report is too difficult to understand or plagiarized works was presented and standard format
0
is not followed.
Score /0.5

SUB-TOTAL C /27%

TOTAL /43%

COMMENTS

NAME OF SUPERVISOR

SIGNATURE DATE