0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
539 vues1 page
1) Tristan Catindig married Lily Gomez-Catindig twice in the Philippines and had 4 children together. They later encountered marital issues and obtained a divorce in the Dominican Republic.
2) Tristan then married petitioner Elmar Perez in the US and they lived as husband and wife for 17 years and had one child. However, Philippine law does not recognize divorces obtained abroad.
3) According to Article 15 of the Philippine Civil Code, Philippine laws relating to family rights and duties apply to Filipino citizens regardless of where they live. Therefore, Tristan's divorce in the Dominican Republic did not dissolve his marriage to Lily under Philippine law.
Description originale:
Digest
Titre original
16. Elmar Perez v. CA (Art. 15 Nationality Theory) Digest
1) Tristan Catindig married Lily Gomez-Catindig twice in the Philippines and had 4 children together. They later encountered marital issues and obtained a divorce in the Dominican Republic.
2) Tristan then married petitioner Elmar Perez in the US and they lived as husband and wife for 17 years and had one child. However, Philippine law does not recognize divorces obtained abroad.
3) According to Article 15 of the Philippine Civil Code, Philippine laws relating to family rights and duties apply to Filipino citizens regardless of where they live. Therefore, Tristan's divorce in the Dominican Republic did not dissolve his marriage to Lily under Philippine law.
1) Tristan Catindig married Lily Gomez-Catindig twice in the Philippines and had 4 children together. They later encountered marital issues and obtained a divorce in the Dominican Republic.
2) Tristan then married petitioner Elmar Perez in the US and they lived as husband and wife for 17 years and had one child. However, Philippine law does not recognize divorces obtained abroad.
3) According to Article 15 of the Philippine Civil Code, Philippine laws relating to family rights and duties apply to Filipino citizens regardless of where they live. Therefore, Tristan's divorce in the Dominican Republic did not dissolve his marriage to Lily under Philippine law.
Perez v CA Elmar O. Perez, petitioner, v. Court of Appeals, Tristan A. Catindig, and Lily Gomez- Catindig, Respondents Ynares-Santiago, J.: Facts: Private respondent Tristan Catindig married Lily Gomez-Catindig twice. The marriage produced 4 children. Several years later, the couple encountered marital problems. Upon the advice of a mutual friend, they decided to obtain a divorce from the Dominican Republic. On April 24, 1984, Tristan and Lily executed Special Power of Attorney (SPA) addressed to the Judge of First Civil Court of San Cristobal, Dominican Republic, appointing an attorney- in-fact to institute a divorce action under its laws On April 30, 1984, Private Respondents Catindig filed joint petition for dissolution of conjugal partnership with RTC of Makati. On June 12, 1984, the civil court in the Dominican Republic ratified the divorce by mutual consent of Tristan and Lily. On July 14, 1984, Respondent Tristan married petitioner Elmar O. Perez, in Virginia, USA, and lived as husband and wife until Oct. 2001, which produced one offspring. During their cohabitation, Petitioner learned that divorce decree issued by the court in the Dominican Republic was not recognized in the Philippines, and Petitioner’s marriage to Tristan was deemed void under Philippine Law. On Aug. 31, 2001, Tristan filed a petition for declaration of nullity of his marriage to Lily with RTC Quezon City. Issue: WON Divorce action in the Dominican Republic dissolved the Co-Respondents’ Marriage. Held: No, divorce did not dissolve marriage. Tristan was still lawfully married to Lily. The Divorce decree that Tristan and Lily obtained from the Dominican Republic never dissolved the marriage bond between them. It is basic that “Laws relating to family rights and duties, or to the status, condition and legal capacity of persons are binding upon the citizens of the Philippines, even though living abroad.” (Art. 15) Regardless of where Philippine citizen is, he or she will be governed by Philippine laws o With respect to his or her family rights and duties, or to his or her status, condition and legal capacity. Hence, if a Filipino regardless of whether he or she was married here or abroad, initiates a petition abroad to obtain an absolute divorce from spouse and eventually becomes successful in getting the same, the Philippines will not recognize such absolute divorce.