Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
. Version 1.0
1 Introduction
This document gives a simple introduction to SFRA analysis; it looks at expected results
for simple components and typical results for arrangements of small coils. The complex
interaction of the coils is a useful way of understanding the far more complex
arrangements within a real transformer.
Table of Contents
1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 1
2 List of Figures ............................................................................................................. 2
3 List of Tables .............................................................................................................. 3
4 List of Equations ......................................................................................................... 3
5 Resistor-Capacitor-Inductor (RLC) Circuits............................................................... 4
6 SFRA Measurement.................................................................................................... 5
7 Frequency Responses of Inductors, Capacitors and Resistors.................................... 6
7.1 Theory ..................................................................................................................... 6
7.2 Resonance ............................................................................................................... 8
7.3 Resonance - Series Arrangement ............................................................................ 9
7.4 Resonance - Parallel Arrangement........................................................................ 11
7.5 Practice.................................................................................................................. 13
8 Results from Two Different Specimen Coils............................................................ 14
8.1 Brown Coil............................................................................................................ 14
8.2 Red Coil ................................................................................................................ 15
8.3 Comparison of Both Coils .................................................................................... 16
9 Coils in Series and in Parallel ................................................................................... 18
9.1 Two Identical Coils............................................................................................... 18
9.2 Identical Coils in Series ........................................................................................ 19
9.3 Identical coils in Parallel....................................................................................... 20
9.4 Red and Brown Coils in Series ............................................................................. 21
9.5 Red and Brown Coils in Parallel........................................................................... 23
10 Coils and Interaction ................................................................................................. 25
10.1 Red Coil Alone ................................................................................................. 25
10.2 Proximity and Arrangement.............................................................................. 26
10.3 Electrical Connection and Arrangement ........................................................... 28
10.4 Autotransformer Arrangements ........................................................................ 29
11 Conclusions............................................................................................................... 32
12 References................................................................................................................. 32
2 List of Figures
3 List of Tables
4 List of Equations
ω = 2πf
Equation 1 Angular Frequency
XC=1/2πfC
Equation 2 Capacitive Reactance Formula
XL=2πfL
Equation 3 Inductive Reactance Formula
300
250 Capacitance
200 Inductance
150
100
50
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Frequency, Hz
In an RLC circuit, such as the series circuit in Figure 2, we can derive a total impedance,
Z, for the circuit.
Z = √(R2 + (XL-XC)2)
Equation 4 Impedance of RLC Circuit
6 SFRA Measurement
Frequency response analysis plots the ratio of the transmitted voltage waveform to the
applied voltage waveform in dBs, as defined in Equation 5. The impedance attenuates the
input voltage signal. The basic measurement circuit is shown in Figure 3. To remove the
effects of test leads, a three lead system is used to measure both input and output voltages
simultaneously.
V signal V in V out
Im pedance, Z
50 Ω C oax
50 Ω C oax 50 Ω C oax
S ignal L ead T est
R eference
M easurem ent M easurem ent
L ead L ead
Coax test leads of 50 ohms are used to apply a source voltage and measure that voltage as
Vin; consequently Vout is referenced against the 50 ohm test lead to ground.
The output voltage, Vout, is referenced via a 50 ohm co-ax cable to ground. This means
we have:
Vout/Vin =50/(Z+50)
Equation 6 Voltage Ratio and Specimen Impedance
7.1 Theory
The expected response for a short circuit, at any frequency, is that Vout is equal to Vin, as
Z=0 Ω. This equals 0 dB across the frequency range.
Response, dB
-25 Response
-50
Frequency, Hz
An ideal resistor reduces the output voltage across the frequency range. A 50 Ω resistor
would give an output voltage half the input voltage. This would be a straight line at ~ 6
dB’s down (-6dB), as shown in Figure 5. A 500 Ω resistor would give a response at ~20.8
dB’s down ( –20.8dB).
Response, 50 Ω Response
dB -25
500 Ω Response
-50
Frequency, Hz
Figure 5 Responses of a 50 ohm and a 500 ohm Ideal Resistor
An open circuit would, in theory, provide infinite impedance, and an output voltage of
zero. This is not calculable as a dB value, but equates to infinite dB’s down.
An ideal Inductor at low frequency looks like a short circuit; as frequency increase, so
does the impedance, heading toward an open circuit. The response for an ideal inductor is
shown in Figure 6. It starts at 0 dB’s and then shows a characteristic roll off, on the log
scale, as frequency increases.
7.2 Resonance
Resonance has different implications for series and parallel circuits, which are analyzed
separately. For simplicity, ideal components are assumed – ideal resistance, ideal
capacitance and ideal inductance. As a note, a summary of how to calculate equivalent
RLC component values for series and parallel combinations is given in Table 1.
Figure 8 shows a series arrangement of an ideal inductor and an ideal capacitor and a
resistance.
XL XC R
Figure 8 Series Arrangement of XL and XC
At low frequencies, the capacitor will dominate and the arrangement will look like an
open circuit i.e. Z approaches infinity. As frequency rises, the impedance of the capacitor
will fall, but the impedance of the inductor will rise.
At high frequencies, the inductor will dominate and the arrangement will look like an
open circuit i.e. Z approaches infinity.
The overall impedance of the arrangement is Z, which we can plot against frequency, as
shown in Figure 9.
450
400
Impedance, Ohms
350
300
250
Series
200
150
100
50
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Frequency, Hz
XL = XC
Equation 7 Condition for Resonance
By using Equation 2, Equation 3 and Equation 7 we can deduce that resonance occurs at
f = 1/(2π√LC)
Equation 8 Resonant Frequency for L-C components
If we were to measure this circuit using an SFRA test set, we would plot the response in
dB'’ rather than in ohms.
Using Equation 5 and Equation 6 the response, D, in dBs for an impedance, Z is given by
Equation 9:
D = 20 log10( 50/(Z+50))
Plotting D for the series Z of Figure 8 yields the graph in Figure 10:
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
-5
-10
dB
-15
-20
-25
Frequency, Hz
Clearly, in dB’s, a series resonance yields a maximum. This relates to the capacitive
climb followed by the inductive roll off.
A maximum in an SFRA plot thus corresponds to a series arrangement of some form that
has reached a resonance.
Figure 11 shows a series arrangement of an ideal inductor and an ideal capacitor and a
resistance.
XC
XL
At low frequencies, the inductor will dominate and the inductor will look like a short
circuit i.e. Z approaches zero. As frequency rises, the impedance of the capacitor will fall,
but the impedance of the inductor will rise.
At high frequencies, the capacitor will dominate and the capacitor will look like a short
circuit again i.e. Z approaches zero again.
The overall impedance of the arrangement is Z, which we can plot against frequency, as
shown in Figure 12.
Parallel
5
Impedance, Ohms
0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Frequency, Hz
XL = XC
Equation 10 Condition for Resonance
f = 1/(2π√LC)
If we were to measure this circuit using an SFRA test set, we would plot the response in
dB's rather than in ohms.
We can plot the response, D, in dBs for an impedance, Z as given by Equation 9, again
noting that Z is a function of frequency and is complex.
Parallel
0
-0.1 0.1 1 10 100 1000
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
dB
-0.5
-0.6
-0.7
-0.8
-0.9
Frequency, Hz
At low and high frequencies, the impedance approaches the value of R, which in this case
is 10 ohms. We can calculate the dB’s the R alone would yield: ~-1.6 dB, as shown in
Figure 13
Clearly, in dB’s, a parallel resonance yields a minimum. This relates to the inductive roll
off followed by the capacitive climb.
Where a minimum occurs in an SFRA plot this corresponds to some parallel arrangement
of an inductor and a capacitor within the transformer.
7.5 Practice
Inductive
roll off
Resistive
region
Capacitive
climb
The response at lower frequencies can be used to derive an approximate d.c. resistance
for the coil. Knowing the response to be ~-0.25 dB and making the assumption that the
response is purely resistive, then the impedance Z can be replaced by a resistance, R and
Equation 5 and Equation 6 used to derive the d.c. resistance. In this case, the value is just
under 1.5 ohms.
At higher frequencies, around 200 kHz, the inductive roll off is replaced by a capacitive
climb. This is where the capacitance between the coils of the specimen counteracts the
effect of the inductive element.
There is another effect in this coil around 1 MHz; this may relate to its construction in
layers where mutual inductance and capacitance between layers begins to have an effect.
Here we look at the response of two different coils; their construction and geometry
affect the way they respond in terms of the inductive roll off and the frequency at which
capacitive effects begin to dominate.
The Brown Coil is shown in Figure 6. It is a simple copper wire coil wound in layers.
Red Coil is made of aluminum stranded wire and has been put together in a far less
controlled manner than the Brown Coil, as shown in Figure 18.
The response for the Red Coil, on Log and Linear scales, is shown Figure 19 and Figure
20. It shows the same general shape as Brown Coil, but the initial resonance is at a higher
frequency, and the impedances are higher, as indicated by the lower dB response (i.e.
more negative response or more attenuation).
The responses of both coils are given on a log and linear scale in Figure 21 and Figure
22.
The smaller resonances may relate to coil construction – the effect is far more noticeable
in the Brown Coil where the construction is neatly layered. It could be a point at which
mutual inductance between layers starts to take effect, followed by capacitance between
layers.
From the magnitude of the responses at low frequencies, it looks like the impedance, and
consequently the inductance, of the Brown Coil is greater than that of Red Coil i.e.
LB>LR.
From the magnitude of the responses at higher frequencies, it looks like the impedance of
Brown Coil is less than that of Red Coil. As there is an inverse relationship with
capacitance, as defined in Equation 2, this implies that CB>CR.
Knowing the relations of LB>LR and CB>CR it follows that LBCB > LRCR and we would
expect the resonant frequency for the Brown Coil to be lower than that for the Red Coil,
as per Equation 8, which is in fact the case.
Responses for the two coils when arranged in series and in parallel have features of both
individual coils.
The response of two identical coils, arranged in series and in parallel, is useful in
identifying the variation due to capacitance and inductance. We can use Table 1 to
identify the responses of the two coils. The two coils are shown in a parallel arrangement
in Figure 23.
The responses for the two coils are shown in Figure 24; as can be seen – they are almost
identical.
The two coils in series have the response in blue shown in Figure 25, which gives the
single coil response for comparison in yellow.
If an individual brown coil has an inductance of LB and a capacitance of CB, and the
series combination has an inductance of LS and a capacitance of CS then, using Table 1:
LS = 2 * LB
Equation 12 Inductance of Series Combination
CS = CB/2
Equation 13 Capacitances in Series
Overall: the inductance has doubled and the capacitance has halved.
At low frequencies there is a more attenuated response and a faster roll off due to the
increased inductance.
At higher frequencies there is a more attenuated response and a slower climb back due to
the decreased capacitance.
The resonant frequency has not changed as it relates to the product of LS and CS as per
Equation 8, which is identical to that for a single coil:
LS * CS = (2 * LB) * (CB/2) = LB * CB
Equation 14 Resonance for Series Combination
Overall the response is more attenuated as the overall impedance has increased – the
attenuation at the resonance point is higher (a more negative dB response).
The two coils in parallel have the response in blue shown in Figure 26.
Overall the impedance for the combination is lower, resulting in reduced attenuation.
LP = LB/2
Equation 15 Inductance of Parallel Combination
CP = 2* CB
Equation 16 Capacitance of Parallel Combination
The reduced inductance gives a less rapid roll off at lower frequencies.
The increased capacitance gives a more rapid climb back at higher frequencies.
Via the same reasoning used for the series combination, the product of LP and CP will be
the same as for the individual coil and thus the resonance will be at the same point.
The coils in series, as shown in Figure 27 gave the response shown in Figure 28.
Clearly there are some identifiable variations for the series combination:
At low frequencies, the series response is more inductive and we have a higher
impedance response, as shown by the lower dB response up to about 100 kHz; this fits
with expected results, as per Table 1, where inductances sum linearly.
At higher frequencies, the response is more capacitive and we see the higher impedance
(lower capacitance) coil dominate the response, modified by the presence of the lower
impedance coil capacitance.
There is also a series resonance at the crossover frequency for the two coils – about 250
kHz, as per section 7.3.
A linear view of the same data, as shown in Figure 30, concentrates on the higher
frequency responses.
The linear scale highlights some interesting variations between the resonance points for
each coil, around 200 kHz.
Note that we now have two inductances in series and two capacitances in series. There
are complex relationships between these values which lead to the final shape of the curve.
The coils in parallel, as shown in Figure 31 gave the response shown in Figure 32.
Clearly there are some identifiable variations for the parallel combination:
At low frequencies, the response is lower impedance as the parallel inductors add
together like parallel resistors, as per Table 1.
At higher frequencies, the response is more capacitive and we see the lower impedance
(higher capacitance) coil dominate the response, modified by the presence of the higher
impedance capacitance. Capacitors in parallel add like resistors in series.
We also now have a parallel resonance for the two coils at the cross over frequency of
about 250 kHZ, as per section 7.4.
The presence of one coil next to the other may affect the result as there is a magnetic
linkage between the two coils. Clearly geometry and proximity will affect the results.
Here we look at a number of cases to see the different effects.
The SFRA results for the Red Coil are given again in Figure 34 below, but from 10 kHz
and higher.
The closer the Brown Coil to the Red Coil, the more marked its effect. When the two
coils are coaxial, there is a strong new resonance in the SFRA results.
Comparison results for the Red Coil alone, and with the Brown Coil nearby are given in
Figure 37. The results are very similar, with only very slight variation around 1.6 MHz.
Figure 37 SFRA Responses for Red Coil with Brown Coil Nearby
The results, as shown in Figure 39, have a new resonance peak set around 150-200 kHz
which relate to the inductance of the Brown Coil, as shown in Figure 16, and the original
resonance at 450 kHz is shifted to higher frequency.
With the coils coaxial, but with the brown coil shorted, as shown in Figure 40, the results,
as shown in Figure 41. The resonance associated with the Brown Coil has now
disappeared, but the effect of the Brown Coil on the Red Coil, shifting the resonance to a
higher frequency, is still there.
Figure 40 Red Coil coaxial with Brown Coil; Brown Coil shorted
Results with the two coils attached also vary with the arrangement of the two coils. With
the Brown Coil attached to the Red Coil, but not in the measurement circuit, as shown in
Figure 42, the results are shown in Figure 43. The variation seen for the Brown Coil in
close proximity, at about 1.6 MHz, as shown in Figure 36, are accentuated in these
results.
Figure 42 Red Coil with Brown Coil Attached, but not in measurement circuit
To make a model autotransformer, the two coils are placed coaxially and connected. The
arrangement in Figure 44 gave the results in Figure 45.
By shorting the Brown Coil, the results vary, as shown in Figure 46.
Figure 46 SFRA Responses for Simple Autotransformer with Shorted Brown Coil
Shorting the Brown Coil greatly reduces the inductance of the Brown Coil and the
resonance associated with it disappears, as happened for the coaxial but not connected
case, shown in Figure 40. The general shape at higher frequencies remains unchanged.
By altering the arrangements of the two coils, as shown in Figure 47, a ‘damaged’
autotransformer is produced: the coils have moved relative to each other.
The response for each coil is evident, as shown in Figure 48, but now we have a variation
at about 400 kHz which reflects the mutual inductance between the two coils. The only
thing that has changed between the two situations is the position of the Brown Coil
relative to the Red Coil. Consequently it can be assumed that this has produced the
variation in response. We have seen ‘winding’ movement cause a change in frequency
response.
Clearly this is a very simple case of winding movement; we could investigate further by
looking at changes in response with movement. That will be left for a future discussion.
11 Conclusions
The display of data in log and linear formats helps to identify differences between traces.
Geometric arrangement of the coils produces new resonances and alters existing
resonances.
12 References