Revised Opcrfs For Htprincipals 2018 2019

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVI
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Education/Misamis Oriental
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
1 CHECKED LESSON PLAN USING CF's, LP HAS

1. TEACHING NUMERICAL/DESCRIPTIVE RATING
MFO1
LEARNING OF
ACCESS
PROCESS
5 8.5-10 OUTSTANDING
6.45-8.49 VERY
ENTIRE 4 SATISFACTORY
SCHOOL 10%
YEAR
3 4.5-6.49 SATISFACTORY
2 2.5-4.49 UNSATISFACTORY
1 2.0-2.49 POOR
2 STUDENTS' ATTENDANCE
MONITORED WITH THE MONTHLY STUDENTS'
ATTENDANCE REPORT
5 AT LEAST 70% OF ATTENDACE
AT LEAST 60-69% OF
4 ATTENDACE
ENTIRE
SCHOOL 10%
YEAR AT LEAST 50-59% OF
3 ATTENDACE
AT LEAST 40-49% OF
2 ATTENDACE
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of ENTIRE
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SCHOOL
Education/Misamis Oriental 10%
YEAR
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
AT LEAST 30-39% OF
1 ATTENDACE
3 DROP-OUT RATE
5 NO DROP-OUT
4 1 TO 2 STUDENTS DROP-OUT
AUGUST- 3 3 TO 4 STUDENTS DROP-OUT

5%
JANUARY
2 5 T0 6 STUDENTS DROP-OUT
1 7 TO 8 STUDENTS DROP-OUT
4 RETENTION RATE
5 NO FAILURE
4 1 TO 2 STUDENTS FAILED
JUNE TO
5%
MARCH 3 3 TO 4 STUDENTS FAILED
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
5 CHECKED QUARTERLY
TEST AND TABLE OF USING CF9 HAS NUMERICAL
SPECIFICATION PREPARED DESCRIPTIVE RATING
5 8.5-10 OUTSTANDING
6.45-8.49 VERY
4
SATISFACTORY
ENTIRE
SCHOOL 10%
YEAR
1 2.0-2.49 POOR
6 SUPERVISED CLASSROOM
MANAGEMENT
5 EXCELLENT
4 VERY GOOD
ENTIRE 3 BETTER
SCHOOL 10%
YEAR
Name of Employee: MANAGEMENT
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
PERFORMANCE
ENTIRE WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
SCHOOL PER
10%
KRA QUALITY
YEAR
2 GOOD
1 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
MFO2 1. STUDENTS' 1 REQUIRED LEARNING

QUALITY OUTCOME COMPETENCIES OF EVERY
SUBJECT IN EVERY WITH THE QUARTERLY
QUARTER ACCOMPLISHED ACCOMPLIHMENT
75% OR MORE OF THE

5 TARGETED LCs ARE
COVERED
69-74% OR MORE OF THE

ENTIRE 4 TARGETED LCs ARE
SCHOOL 10% COVERED
YEAR
3 TARGETED LCs ARE
COVERED

2 TARGETED LCs ARE
COVERED
58% OR LESS OR MORE OF

1 THE TARGETED LCs ARE
COVERED
2 1 % INCREMENT IN MPS Conducted 4 or more school

FOR QUARTERLY based trainings/LAC Sessions
ASSESSMENT ACHIEVED 5 within a year supported with
training matrix,attendance and
pictures
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of

2 1 % INCREMENT IN MPS
FOR QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT ACHIEVED WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
KRA 3: Conducted 3 school based

HUMAN trainings/LAC Sessions within a
RESOURCE 4 year supported with training
MANAGEMENT matrix,attendance and pictures
AND
DEVELOPMENT
Conducted 2 school based
(15%) ENTIRE trainings/LAC Sessions within a
SCHOOL 5%
3 year supported with training
YEAR matrix,attendance and pictures
Conducted 1 school based

trainings/LAC Sessions within a
2 year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
Organized but Conducted no

school based trainings/LAC
1 Sessions within a year.
● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers

best fit to teach to the areas,grades they best fit
(grades/learning areas, special 5 within a year supported by
assignments) approved class program
Assigned 85-99% of the teachers

to the areas,grades they best fit
4 within a year supported by
approved class program
Assigned 70-84% of the teachers

to the areas,grades they best fit
April 2017 to
4% 3 within a year supported by
March 2018 approved class program
Assigned 55- 69% of the

teachers to the areas,grades
2 they best fit within a year
supported by approved class
program
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: April 2017 to
March 2018
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
Assigned 54% and below of the

teachers to the areas,grades
supported by approved class
program
● Recommended and 100% of the teachers were
coordinated services for the recommended for
holistic development of school 5 promotion/training /scholarship in
personnel and learners a year
85-99 % of the teachers were
recommended for
4
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
70-84% of the teachers were
April 2017 to recommended for
4% 3
March 2018 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
55-69% of the teachers were
recommended for
2 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
54% and below of the teachers

were recommended for
a year
● Initiated and compiled 100% of the teachers have
teacher's professional 5 complete,neat ,accurate and
documents in portfolios authentic portfolio in a year
85-99% of the teachers have

4 complete,neat, auhentic and
accurate portfolio in a year

April 2017 to complete,neat ,accurate and
3% 3 authentic portfolio in a year
March 2018

2 complete,neat ,accurate and
authentic portfolio in a year
54%and below of the teachers

1 have complete,neat ,accurate
and authentic portfolio in a year
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
BASIC ● Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages

EDUCATION stakeholders 5 with stakeholders with MOA,
SERVICES MOU in a year.
KRA 4: Established 4 linkages with
PARENT'S stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in
INVOLVEMENT 4 a year.
AND COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIPS
Established 3 linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in
(10%) April 2017 to 3 a year.
2%
March 2018
Established 2 linkages with

stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in
2 a year.
Established 1linkage with

stakeholder with MOA, MOU. in
1 a year.
● Met parents regularly to Met PTA 5 or more times in a

confer/inform about school year to discuss SRC ,etc.
accomplishments 5 supported by minutes,
agreements,attendance
sheets,pictures,etc.
Met PTA 4 times in a year too

discuss SRC, etc. supported by
4 minutes, agreements,attendance
Met PTA 3 times in a year to

April 2017 to discuss SRC, etc. supported by
2%
March 2018 3 minutes, agreements,attendance
Met PTA 2 times in a year to

Met PTA 1 time in a year to

Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
● Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs

with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to
school needs address school needs based on
SWOT supported with program
5 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Designed 4 programs /projects

with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
supported with program
pictures,etc

April 2017 to supported with program
2%
March 2018 3 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

supported with program
pictures,etc
Designed 1 program /project with

stakeholders to address school
needs based on SWOT
1 supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more

of stakeholders stakeholders during programs
5 within the school year fully
documented
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of

● Recognized accomplishments
of stakeholders PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
Awarded 15 to 19 stakeholders
4 during programs at the end of the
school year fully documented
April 2017 to Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders
2%
March 2018 3 during programs at the end of the
Awarded 5-9 stakeholders
2 during programs at the end of the
Awarded 4 and below
1 stakeholders during programs at
the end of the school year
● Mediated and ensured Resolved all conflicts within the
resolution of conflicts in school 5 school level with complete
documents
Resolved all conflicts within the

4 school level with incomplete
documents
conflicts not resolved within the

April 2017 to school level and reaches to
1% 3 district office with complete
March 2018
documents
all conflicts not resolved within
2 the school level reaches division
level with complete documents
all conflicts not resolved within

1 the school level with complete
documents
BASIC ● Formulated school policies Formulated 5 or more school

EDUCATION with stakeholders policies with the participation of
SERVICES 5 the stakeholders fully
documented
Formulated 4 school policies

with the participation of the
4 stakeholders fully documented
Formulated 3 school policies with

the participation of the
April 2017 to 3 stakeholders fully documented
1%
March 2018
BASICof Employee:
Name ● Formulated school policies
EDUCATION with stakeholders
Position:
SERVICES
Review Period:
Department of
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
April 2017 to PER
1%
KRA QUALITY
March 2018
Formulated 2 school policies

with the participation of the
Formulated 1school policy with

the participation of the
● Divide equally the teaching Prepared/submitted SF 7

loads to all school teaching reflecting 6 loads with
personnel 5 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
KRA 5: Prepared/submitted SF 7
SCHOOL reflecting 5 loads with
LEADERSHIP, 4 coordinatorships/clubs of the
MANAGEMENT teaching personnel approved by
AND OPERATIONS SDS within the school year.
(20%) Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 4 loads with
April 2017 to
March 2018
4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the
Prepared/submitted SF 7
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the
Prepared/submitted SF 7
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the
● Led and implemented led and implemented 5 or more
educational programs educational programs, program
5 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of

● Led and implemented PERFORMANCE
educational programs WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
led and implemented 4

educational programs, program

April 2017 to 3 design is approved by SDS
3% before the implementation
March 2018


educational program, program
BASIC ● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, accurate

EDUCATION and Management and ,authentic liquidation reports
SERVICES Operations Functions 5 monthly
Submitted complete, accurate

,authentic liquidation reports bi-
4 monthly
Submitted incomplete,
accurate ,authentic liquidation
April 2016 to 3 reports monthly
3%
March 2017
Submitted
incomplete,inaccurate ,not
2 authentic liquidation reports
monthly
Submitted
incomplete,inaccurate ,not
1 authentic liquidation reports bi-
monthly
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
● Requested and distributed 100% of the requested

instructional materials instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
5 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested
instructional materials were
75-84% of the requested
April 2016 to 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and
3%
March 2017 summary of disbursement
55-74% of the requested

54% and below of the requested

● Led the preparation of Crafted a doable, original ,need-

SIP/AIP/APP and ensured based SIP/AIP /APP and
participation of stakeholders ensured 100% participation of
5 internal and external
stakeholders approved by SDS
supported with documents
Crafted a doable, original ,need-

based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 85-99% participation of
Name of Employee: ● Led the preparation of
Position: SIP/AIP/APP and ensured
Review Period: participation of stakeholders
Department of
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY

April 2016 to 3 internal and external
4% stakeholders approved by SDS
March 2017


ensured 54% and below
participation of internal and
1 external stakeholders approved
by SDS supported with
documents
● Organized special classes for Organized at least 4 special

learners with special needs classes for learners with special
5 needs with complete documents
(enrolment,teacher,needs)
Organized 3 special classes for

learners with special needs with
4 complete documents ( enrolment,
teacher, needs)
Organized 2 special class for
April 2016 to learners with special needs with
3%
March 2017 3 complete documents
( enrolment, teacher, needs)
Organized 1 special class for

learners with special needs with
2 complete documents
Organized no special class for

1 learners with special needs.
106%
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
KRA QUALITY
Ratee: Rater:
JEAN G. VELOSO
Assistant Schools Division Superin
Approving Authority:
CHERRY MAE L. LIMBACO, PhD., CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Position: Assistant Schools Div
Date of Review:
Department of
Education/Misamis Oriental
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
1 CHECKED LESSON PLAN USING CF's, LP HAS

NUMERICAL/DESCRIPTIVE RATING NUMBER OF LESSON PLAN LESSON PLAN IS SUBMITTED
OF DELIVERED EVERY MONTH AND CHECKED
5 8.5-10 OUTSTANDING AT LEAST 15 DELIVERED EVERY THURSDAY MORNING
6.45-8.49 VERY A DAY AFTER THE AGREED

ENTIRE 4 SATISFACTORY 10 TO 14 LP DELIVERED
SCHEDULED
SCHOOL 10%
YEAR
2 DAYS AFTER THE AGREED
3 4.5-6.49 SATISFACTORY 5 TO 9 LP DELIVERED
SCHEDULE

2 2.5-4.49 UNSATISFACTORY 3 TO 4 LP DELIVERED
SCHEDULE

1 2.0-2.49 POOR 2 AND BELOW LP DELIVERED
SCHEDULE
2 STUDENTS' ATTENDANCE
MONITORED WITH THE MONTHLY STUDENTS' ATTENDANCE REPORT ATTENDANCE REPORT
ATTENDANCE REPORT SUBMITTED ON SUBMITTED ON
ON THE 1ST SCHOOL DAY OF

5 AT LEAST 70% OF ATTENDACE ON THE AGREED SCHEDULE THE FOLLOWING MONTH
AT LEAST 60-69% OF ON THE DAY AFTER THE ON THE 2ND SCHOOL DAY OF
4 ATTENDACE AGREED SCHEDULE THE FOLLOWING MONTH
ENTIRE
SCHOOL 10%
YEAR AT LEAST 50-59% OF 2ND DAY AFTER AGREED ON THE 3RD SCHOOL DAY OF
3 ATTENDACE SCHEDULE THE FOLLOWING MONTH
AT LEAST 40-49% OF 3RD DAY AFTER AGREED ON THE 4TH SCHOOL DAY OF
Date of Review:
Department of ENTIRE
SCHOOL
YEAR
WEIGHT
AT LEAST 30-39% OF 4TH DAY AFTER AGREED ON THE 5TH SCHOOL DAY OF
3 DROP-OUT RATE
5 NO DROP-OUT NO DROP-OUT NO DROP-OUT
4 1 TO 2 STUDENTS DROP-OUT 1 TO 2 STUDENTS DROP-OUT 1 TO 2 STUDENTS DROP-OUT
AUGUST- 3 3 TO 4 STUDENTS DROP-OUT 3 TO 4 STUDENTS DROP-OUT 3 TO 4 STUDENTS DROP-OUT

5%
JANUARY
2 5 T0 6 STUDENTS DROP-OUT 5 T0 6 STUDENTS DROP-OUT 5 T0 6 STUDENTS DROP-OUT
1 7 TO 8 STUDENTS DROP-OUT 7 TO 8 STUDENTS DROP-OUT 7 TO 8 STUDENTS DROP-OUT
4 RETENTION RATE
5 NO FAILURE NO FAILURE NO FAILURE
4 1 TO 2 STUDENTS FAILED 1 TO 2 STUDENTS FAILED 1 TO 2 STUDENTS FAILED
JUNE TO
5%
MARCH 3 3 TO 4 STUDENTS FAILED 3 TO 4 STUDENTS FAILED 3 TO 4 STUDENTS FAILED

Date of Review:
Department of
WEIGHT
5 CHECKED QUARTERLY SUBMITTED TQS AND TOS SUBMITTED TQS AND TOS
TEST AND TABLE OF USING CF9 HAS NUMERICAL
BEFORE THE QUARTERLY BEFORE THE QUARTERLY
SPECIFICATION PREPARED DESCRIPTIVE RATING
EXAMINATIONS EXAMINATIONS
10 SCHOOL DAYS BEFORE
THE QUARTERLY
EXAMINATIONS
5 8.5-10 OUTSTANDING ON THE AGREED SCHEDULE
8 SCHOOL DAYS BEFORE THE

QUARTERLY EXAMINATIONS
6.45-8.49 VERY ON THE DAY AFTER THE
4
SATISFACTORY AGREED SCHEDULE
ENTIRE 6 SCHOOL DAYS BEFORE THE

SCHOOL 10% QUARTERLY EXAMINATIONS
YEAR 2ND DAY AFTER AGREED
SCHEDULE

3RD DAY AFTER AGREED
SCHEDULE

4TH DAY AFTER AGREED
1 2.0-2.49 POOR
SCHEDULE
MANAGEMENT
CLASSROOM RESTRUCTURING FOR THE NEXT QUARTER IS
5 EXCELLENT
DONE 10-15 DAYS AFTER THE EXAMINATION

4 VERY GOOD
ENTIRE CLASSROOM RESTRUCTURING FOR THE NEXT QUARTER IS

3 BETTER
SCHOOL 10% DONE 21-25 DAYS AFTER THE EXAMINATION
YEAR
MANAGEMENT Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Date of Review:
Department of
ENTIRE WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
SCHOOL PER
10%
YEAR

2 GOOD

1 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
DONE 30 DAYS AFTER THE EXAMINATION
1 REQUIRED LEARNING
COMPETENCIES OF EVERY
SUBJECT IN EVERY WITH THE QUARTERLY SUBMIITED QUARTERLY SUBMIITED QUARTERLY
QUARTER ACCOMPLISHED ACCOMPLIHMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT
75% OR MORE OF THE 75% OR MORE OF THE

ON THE 1ST SCHOOL OF THE
5 TARGETED LCs ARE TARGETED LCs ARE
FOLLOWING MONTH
COVERED COVERED
69-74% OR MORE OF THE 69-74% OR MORE OF THE

ON THE 2ND SCHOOL OF THE
ENTIRE 4 TARGETED LCs ARE TARGETED LCs ARE
FOLLOWING MONTH
SCHOOL 10% COVERED COVERED
YEAR
ON THE 3RD SCHOOL OF THE
FOLLOWING MONTH
COVERED COVERED

ON THE 4TH SCHOOL OF THE
FOLLOWING MONTH
COVERED COVERED
58% OR LESS OR MORE OF 58% OR LESS OR MORE OF

ON THE 5TH SCHOOL OF THE
1 THE TARGETED LCs ARE THE TARGETED LCs ARE
FOLLOWING MONTH
COVERED COVERED
2 1 % INCREMENT IN MPS Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school
FOR QUARTERLY based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions
ASSESSMENT ACHIEVED 5 within a year supported with within a year supported with within a year supported with
training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and
pictures pictures using other funds. pictures before INSET Schedule
Date of Review:
Department of

2 1 % INCREMENT IN MPS
FOR QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
ASSESSMENT ACHIEVED WEIGHT
Conducted 3 school based Conducted 3 school based Conducted 4 or more school

trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
4 year supported with training year supported with training within a year supported with
matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
using other funds pictures during October INSET
Conducted 2 school based Conducted 2 school based Conducted 4 or more school

ENTIRE trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
SCHOOL 5%
3 year supported with training year supported with training within a year supported with
YEAR matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
using other funds pictures during summer INSET
Conducted 1 school based Conducted 1 school based
trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a
2 year supported with training year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures
using other funds.
Organized but Conducted no Conducted no school based

school based trainings/LAC trainings/LAC Sessions within a
1 Sessions within a year. year using other funds.
● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers Performs 3 ancillary services on
best fit to teach to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
(grades/learning areas, special 5 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
assignments) approved class program program before deadline
Assigned 85-99% of the teachers Performs 2 ancillary services on

to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
4 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
approved class program program on the deadline
Assigned 70-84% of the teachers Performs 1 ancillary service on

to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
April 2017 to
4% 3 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
March 2018 approved class program program 1 day after the deadline
Assigned 55- 69% of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades with high mastery level with high Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
2 they best fit within a year mastery level
supported by approved class program 2-3 days after the
program deadline
Date of Review:
Department of
April 2017 to
March 2018
WEIGHT
Assigned 54% and below of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades with average mastery level Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
supported by approved class program 4-5 days after the
program deadline
● Recommended and 100% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations

coordinated services for the recommended for before the dealine
holistic development of school 5 promotion/training /scholarship in
personnel and learners a year
85-99 % of the teachers were Submitted recommendations on
recommended for the the dealine
4
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
70-84% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 1
April 2017 to recommended for day after the dealine
4% 3
March 2018 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
55-69% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 2
recommended for days after the dealine
a year
54% and below of the teachers Submitted recommendations 3

were recommended for days after the dealine
a year
● Initiated and compiled 100% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,
teacher's professional 5 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
documents in portfolios authentic portfolio in a year portfolio before March 2017
85-99% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,

4 complete,neat, auhentic and accurate and authentic teacher's
accurate portfolio in a year portfolio first week of March 2017

April 2017 to complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
3% 3 authentic portfolio in a year
March 2018 portfolio second week of March
2017
2 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
authentic portfolio in a year portfolio 3rd week of March 2017
54%and below of the teachers Complied complete ,neat ,

1 have complete,neat ,accurate accurate and authentic teacher's
and authentic portfolio in a year portfolio on April 2017
Date of Review:
Department of
WEIGHT
● Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages Established linkages with

stakeholders 5 with stakeholders with MOA, stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
MOU in a year. the start of the school year.
Established 4 linkages with Established linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
4 a year. the first quarter of the school
year.
April 2017 to 3 a year. the 2nd quarter of the school
2%
March 2018 year.
2 a year. the 3rd quarter of the school
year.
Established 1linkage with Established linkages with
stakeholder with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
1 a year. the 4th quarter of the school
year.
● Met parents regularly to Met PTA 5 or more times in a 90%-100% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings in
confer/inform about school year to discuss SRC ,etc. during PTA Meeting advance of the schedule under
accomplishments 5 supported by minutes, D.O. 25, s. 2017
agreements,attendance
Met PTA 4 times in a year too 79%-89% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings within
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting the schedule under D.O. 25, s.
4 minutes, agreements,attendance 2017
Met PTA 3 times in a year to 59%-78% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings a week
April 2017 to discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
2%
March 2018 3 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
Met PTA 2 times in a year to 39%-58% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 2 weeks
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
2 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
Met PTA 1 time in a year to 10%-38% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 3 weeks
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O. 25,
1 minutes, agreements,attendance s. 2017
Date of Review:
Department of
WEIGHT
● Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs Implemented 5 or more Implemented programs /projects
with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to programs /projects with with stakeholders to address
school needs address school needs based on stakeholders to address school school needs based on SWOTa
SWOT supported with program needs based on SWOT week after the approval of the
5 design,minutes/agreements, supported with program design, supported with program
pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc pictures,etc
Designed 4 programs /projects Implemented 4 programs Implemented programs /projects

with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT,2
supported with program SWOT supported with program weeks after the approval of the
4 design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT, a
April 2017 to supported with program SWOT supported with program month after the approval of the
2%
March 2018 3 design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc

school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT, 2
supported with program SWOT supported with program months after the approval of the
2 design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc
Designed 1 program /project with Implemented 1 program /project Implemented programs /projects
stakeholders to address school with stakeholders to address with stakeholders to address
needs based on SWOT school needs based on SWOT school needs based on SWOT,
1 supported with program supported with program 3months after the approval of
design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, the design, supported with
pictures,etc pictures,etc program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders every end
of stakeholders stakeholders during programs awards of less cost using funds of the activity/project
5 within the school year fully outside from
documented MOOE/PTA/Teachers
Date of Review:
Department of

● Recognized accomplishments
of stakeholders PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
Awarded 15 to 19 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during

4 during programs at the end of the awards of less cost using funds assembly every end of the
school year fully documented from PTA grading period
April 2017 to Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during
2%
March 2018 3 during programs at the end of the awards of less cost using funds education week celebration
school year fully documented from MOOE
Awarded 5-9 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders at the end
2 during programs at the end of the awards of high cost of March
Awarded 4 and below Use most expensive awards of Awarded stakeholders during
1 stakeholders during programs at high cost using funds from the bregada eskwela .
the end of the school year teacher.
● Mediated and ensured Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts before it is
resolution of conflicts in school 5 school level with complete filed in the school level
documents
Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts after it is filed

4 school level with incomplete in the school level
documents
conflicts not resolved within the Resolved conflicts in two

April 2017 to school level and reaches to hearings after it is filed in the
1% 3 district office with complete school level
March 2018
documents
all conflicts not resolved within Resolved conflicts in three
2 the school level reaches division hearings after it is filed in the
level with complete documents school level
all conflicts not resolved within Resolved conflicts in four

1 the school level with complete hearings after it is filed in the
documents school level
● Formulated school policies Formulated 5 or more school Formulated school policies with
with stakeholders policies with the participation of the participation of the
5 the stakeholders fully stakeholders fully documented
documented before the start of classes
Formulated 4 school policies Formulated school policies with

with the participation of the the participation of the
4 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented
during the start of classes
Formulated 3 school policies with Formulated school policies with
the participation of the the participation of the
April 2017 to 3 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented a
1%
March 2018 month after the start of classes
● Formulated school policies Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
with stakeholders
Date of Review:
Department of
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
April 2017 to PER
1%
March 2018
Formulated 2 school policies Formulated school policies with

with the participation of the the participation of the
two months after the start of
classes
Formulated 1school policy with Formulated school policies with
the participation of the the participation of the
three months after the start of
classes
● Divide equally the teaching Prepared/submitted SF 7 100% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
loads to all school teaching reflecting 6 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
personnel 5 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 10 days before
SDS within the school year. the deadline
Prepared/submitted SF 7 85-99% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7

reflecting 5 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
4 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 5 days before

April 2017 to
March 2018
4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS on the
SDS within the school year. deadline
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 5 days after
Prepared/submitted SF 7 54%and below of the teachers Prepared/submitted SF 7

reflecting 6 loads with garnered awards as coordinators reflecting loads with
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the on top of their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 10 days after
● Led and implemented led and implemented 5 or more Addressed 100% of the identified Submitted Accomplishment
educational programs educational programs, program school problems supported by Report before the date spicified
5 design is approved by SDS accomplishment report and in the approved implementation
before the implementation noted by SDS plan
Date of Review:
Department of

● Led and implemented PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
educational programs WEIGHT
led and implemented 4 Addressed 85% - 99% of the Submitted Accomplishment

educational programs, program identified school problems Report on the date spicified in
4 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment the approved implementation
before the implementation report and noted by SDS plan

educational programs, program identified school problems Report 1day after the date
April 2017 to 3 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
3% before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan
March 2018

educational programs, program identified school problems Report 2 days after the date
2 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan
led and implemented 1 Addressed 54% and below of the Submitted Accomplishment
educational program, program identified school problems Report 3 days after the date
1 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan
● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate
and Management and ,authentic liquidation reports together with Cash advance for ,authentic liquidation reports 3
Operations Functions 5 monthly the next month with no instance days before the deadline
of unliquidated CA.
Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate

,authentic liquidation reports bi- without CA for the next month ,authentic liquidation reports 2
4 monthly with no instance of unliquidated days before the deadline
CA
Submitted incomplete, Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete, accurate
accurate ,authentic liquidation both Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports 1
April 2016 to 3 reports monthly month with one instances of days before the deadline
3%
March 2017 unliquidated CA
Submitted Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete, accurate

incomplete,inaccurate ,not both Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports on
2 authentic liquidation reports month with two instances of the deadline
monthly unliquidated CA
Submitted Submitted liquidation report ; or Submitted complete, accurate

incomplete,inaccurate ,not bjoth Cash advance for the next ,authentic liquidation reports 1-3
1 authentic liquidation reports bi- month with three instances of days after the deadline
monthly unliquidated CA
Date of Review:
Department of
WEIGHT
● Requested and distributed 100% of the requested 100% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers immediately after
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as the delivery .
5 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested 85-99% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers a day after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
75-84% of the requested 75-84% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 2 days after the
April 2016 to 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
3%
March 2017 summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
55-74% of the requested 55-74% of the requested Distributed instructional materials

54% and below of the requested 54% and below of the requested Distributed instructional materials
● Led the preparation of Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
SIP/AIP/APP and ensured based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
participation of stakeholders ensured 100% participation of ensured participation of internal ensured participation of internal
5 internal and external and external stakeholders and external stakeholders before
stakeholders approved by SDS without revision on SIP /AIP and the deadline
supported with documents APP.
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 85-99% participation of ensured participation of internal ensured participation of internal
4 internal and external and external stakeholders and external stakeholders on the
stakeholders approved by SDS without revision on SIP and AIP. deadline
supported with documents And revision on APP.
● Led the preparation of Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
SIP/AIP/APP and ensured Position: Assistant Schools Div
participation of stakeholders Date of Review:
Department of
WEIGHT
April 2016 to 3 internal and external and external stakeholders with and external stakeholders 1 day
4% stakeholders approved by SDS revisions on the two after the deadline
March 2017
2 internal and external and external stakeholders with and external stakeholders 2
stakeholders approved by SDS revisions on the three days after the deadline
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original

based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 54% and below ensured participation of internal
participation of internal and and external stakeholders 3
1 external stakeholders approved days after the deadline
by SDS supported with
documents
● Organized special classes for Organized at least 4 special Conducted at least 4 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs classes for learners with special classes for learners with special with special needs at the start of
5 needs with complete documents needs the school year.
(enrolment,teacher,needs)
Organized 3 special classes for Conducted at least 3 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs a week after
4 complete documents ( enrolment, needs the start of the school year.
teacher, needs)
Organized 2 special class for Conducted at least 2 special Conducted classes for learners
April 2016 to learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs two weeks
3%
March 2017 3 complete documents needs after the start of the school year.
Organized 1 special class for Conducted 1 special classes for Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with learners with special needs with with special needs a month after
2 complete documents no documents the start of the school year.
Organized no special class for non-compliant Conducted classes for learners

1 learners with special needs. with special needs two months
after the start of the school year.
106%
LE
Date of Review:
Department of
WEIGHT
Rater:
JEAN G. VELOSO 3
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent 2
1
Approving Authority:
CHERRY MAE L. LIMBACO, PhD., CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Supervised and directed all school Instructional Supervisory Plan (Completed Monthly,stamped received in the Division
KRA 1: teaching & non-teaching personnel Office on the target date.
INSTRUCTION ● Managed Instructional System

AL Instructional Supervision Form and /or Clinical observation sheets compiled monthly
LEADERSHIP
● Inspected regularly Daily Lesson Instructional Accomplishment Reports in the form of Individual Teacher Teaching
Logs (DLL) Performance Record (ITTPR)
Teacher Observed and Given Assistance( TOGA) complied monthly ,stamped
received in the Division Office on the Target date.
● Monitored teachers upkeep of Report comparative NAT RESULT (Graphical Presentation of previous and present
students records results showing comparison)
● Provided a safe and child friendly Child Friendly School Survey

KRA 2: learning environment for learners Child Protection Policy
Scouting
Feeding Program
SCHOOL Health Care Package
RESOURCE
Athletics
MANAGEMEN
T Religious Instruction
● Evaluated the school plant, physical School Building Inventory

facilities, safety and sufficiencywith DRRM Mobilization Plan
the assistance of specialist Fire Insurance
School Report Card
Classroom Structuring
Updated EBEIS
Child Protection Policy
School Site Development Plan
School Ownership
School Policy Development
● Formulated intervention prorgram to Performance Indicators

determine the strength, weakness, Fire Drill
opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the Eartquake Drill
school
School Watching List
School Deworming Report
School Immunization Report
Brigada Eskwela
Schoo-Based Management
Continuous Improvemement (CI) Projects
● Supervised and directed all school Teacher's Portfolio

KRA 3: teaching and non-teaching a) Observation Sheets
personnel b) TSNA Result
HUMAN c) IPPD
RESOURCE
MANAGEMEN
● Organized and conducted In-Service Report on Training conducted in school
T AND
DEVELOPMEN Training a) Memorandum of In-Service Training
T b) Training Matrix and Design
c) Attendance Sheet
KRA 3:
HUMAN
RESOURCE
MANAGEMEN CHECKLIST
● Organized and conducted In-Service OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF
T AND
DEVELOPMEN Training
T ( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
d) Narrattive Report and Pictures
● Assigned teachers where they best SF 7

fit to teach (grades/learning areas, Form 201
special assignments) DHRIS
● Promoted and coordinated services List of teachers recommended for promotion with approved ERF
for the holistic development of List of teachers promoted
school personnel and learners List of teachers sent as trainers, coaches, chaperons or coordinators
● Initiated and compiled teacher's Teacher's Portfolio

professional documents in portfolios DHRIS
List of teachers promoted
● Established linkages with Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

KRA 4: stakeholders MOA
Resolution
PARENT'S Projects Implemented
INVOLVEMENT Brigada Eskwela
AND
BSP/GSP
COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIP Participation Community Activities
S
● Met parents regularly to Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
confer/inform about school Quarterly Conferences
accomplishments Narrative Report
SOSA (Accomplishment Reports, SRC, Financial Report)
● Designed programs with ESIP

stakeholders to address schoo AIP
needs School Development Plan
Strategic Plan
Accomplishment Report
Pictorials
● Recognized accomplishments of Certificate of Appreciation/Recognition

stakeholders Program of Activities (Stakeholderr's Day, Team Building)
Narrattive Report
Pictorials
● Promoted welfare of stakeholders Action Plan

School Policies
Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
● Mediated and ensured resolution of School Mediation Committee (Organizational Structure)

conflicts in school School Grievance Committee
Anectdotal Record
School Case Record
Narrative Report
Pictorials
● Formulated school policies with Stakeholders Constitution and by Laws

stakeholders Handbook
CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF
● Formulated school policies with ( / or REMARKS /

KRA's OBJECTIVES
stakeholders x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Harnessed participation of alumni Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

and other organization (NGO's, Alumni Organizational Structure
LGU's, PPP) Alumni Activities
Membership Records, Financial Reords
Projects Implemented
Accomplishment Report
● Supervised and directed all school Class Porgram

KRA 5: teaching and non-teaching Coordinatorships and Clubs
personnel
SCHOOL ● Led and implemented educational DropOut Reduction Program
LEADERSHIP, programs IPED
MANAGEMEN
T AND Reading Program
OPERATIONS Alternative Delivery Mode
GAD
● Directed, coordinated nad managed Request for Cash Advances

school funds according to prioritizes Liquidation Reports
needs
● Requested and distributed Purchase Request

instructional materials Requisition and Issue Slip
Logbook
● Led the preparation of SIP/AIP and Accomplished AIP, SIP

ensured participation of stakeholders Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
● Organized special classes for List of learners with special needs

learners with special needs School Form 1, SF-2, SF-5, SF-6
Learning Modules and Materials

Revised Opcrfs For Htprincipals 2018 2019

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Revised Opcrfs For Htprincipals 2018 2019

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVI

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

1 CHECKED LESSON PLAN USING CF's, LP HAS

5 AT LEAST 70% OF ATTENDACE

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

AUGUST- 3 3 TO 4 STUDENTS DROP-OUT

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

MFO2 1. STUDENTS' 1 REQUIRED LEARNING

75% OR MORE OF THE

69-74% OR MORE OF THE

59-64% OR MORE OF THE

58% OR LESS OR MORE OF

2 1 % INCREMENT IN MPS Conducted 4 or more school

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

KRA 3: Conducted 3 school based

Conducted 1 school based

Organized but Conducted no

● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers

Assigned 85-99% of the teachers

Assigned 70-84% of the teachers

Assigned 55- 69% of the

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Assigned 54% and below of the

54% and below of the teachers

85-99% of the teachers have

75-84% of the teachers have

55-69% of the teachers have

54%and below of the teachers

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

BASIC ● Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages

Established 2 linkages with

Established 1linkage with

● Met parents regularly to Met PTA 5 or more times in a

Met PTA 4 times in a year too

Met PTA 3 times in a year to

Met PTA 2 times in a year to

Met PTA 1 time in a year to

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

● Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs

Designed 4 programs /projects

Designed 3 programs /projects

Designed 2 programs /projects

Designed 1 program /project with

● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Resolved all conflicts within the

conflicts not resolved within the

all conflicts not resolved within

BASIC ● Formulated school policies Formulated 5 or more school

Formulated 4 school policies

Formulated 3 school policies with

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Formulated 2 school policies

Formulated 1school policy with

● Divide equally the teaching Prepared/submitted SF 7

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

led and implemented 4

led and implemented 3

led and implemented 2

led and implemented 1

BASIC ● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, accurate

Submitted complete, accurate