Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
N. M. COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY
NAVSARI - 396 450.
-: TITLE OF ASSIGNMENT:-
SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY
INTRODUCTION
Capacity of flight is why the insects have been most successful among all living
organisms. and this has been possible only due to presence of two pairs of
wings.
REVIEW:
Ai et. al. (2010) obsereved bristles along the wing margin of silk worm,
Bombyx mori were studied morphologically and electrophysiologically.
Aleman et. al. (2009) determined wing length and width of Anastrepha
obliqua from 3 Cuban localities were having wings smaller and their
comparison with Anastrepha fraterculus from elsewhere from Latin America.
Baskaran (2015) found higher factor loading with body length and hind
wing length and wing angle 42O and 69.18 % in discriminating various
populations of Indian honey bee in Tamilnadu.
Brisson et. al. (2010) identified the wing development genes of pea aphid,
Acyrthosiphon pisum, which produces winged and unwinged adults in response
to environment clues.
Khiaban et. al. (2010) studied shapes and size of wings and compared
them in population on four host plants ( cotton, tomato, corn and chickpea )
using a land mark-based geometric method.
WINGS:
The wings of the insects are borne on the meso and metathorax. They are
characteristic features of insects, but a wingless condition accurs in a number of
different groups of insects. In some ,the absence on wings is obviously
secondary.
WING DEVELOPMENT:
WING VENATION:
A unique system has been established to name the wing veins to identify and
classify different insects. It has been shown that the position and number of
veins have changed from primitive orders to the more advanced orders, as well
as within each order. This along with the fossils remains of the wings of ancient
insects has made it possible to develop a classification of insects which
probably closely parallels the actual evolution of class – Insecta.
Wing veins appear as thickened lines and some of these lines run from the base
of the wings towards the apex. The complete system of veins of a wing is
termed as its venation or neuration.
Most of the insects wings are more or less triangular in outline and therefore
have three margins
1. Costa (C+) - just behind the leading edge of wing (costal margin)
2. Sub costa (Sc-)
3. Radius (R+)
4. Median (M)
i. Anterior Median (MA+)
ii. Posterior Median (MA-)
5. Cubitus (Cu)
i. Anterior Cubitus (CuA+)
ii. Posterior Cubitus (CuP-)
6. Anal vein (A+)
i. 1A
ii. 2A
iii. 3A etc..
Presence of longitudinal veins and cross veins, wing surface gets divided into a
number of enclosed spaces termed cells.
In insects (dragonfly and damselfly an opaque spot near costal margin of wing -
pterostigma
WING REGIONS
The anterior area of the wing supported by veins is usually called remigium.
The flexible posterior area is termed vannus. The two regions are separated by
vannal fold. The proximal part of vannus is called jugum, when well developed
is separated by a jugal fold. The area containing wing articulation sclerities,
pteralia is called axilla.
Insects have evolved many variations of the wings, and an individual insect may
posess more than one type of wing. Wing venation is a commonly used
taxonomic character, especially at the family and species level.
In most living insects (the Neoptera), there are three axillary sclerites that
articulate with various parts of the wing. In the Neoptera, a muscle on the third
axillary causes it to pivot about the posterior notal wing process and thereby to
fold the wing over the back of the insect. (In some groups of Neoptera, such as
butterflies, the ability to fold the wings over the back has been lost.) Two orders
of winged insects, the Ephemeroptera and Odonata, have not evolved this wing-
flexing mechanism, and their axillary
sclerites are arranged in a pattern
different from that of the Neoptera; these
two orders (together with a number of
extinct orders) form the Paleoptera.
jf,jugal fold;
Ju, jugum;
Rm, remigium;
Vn, vannus;
There are great variations in the wings of the insects. Many of these variations
represent modification, which accommodate the demands of flight
characteristicss of the particular group of insects.
Wing coupling indicates the coupling of the coupling of the fore and hind wings
together by means of different interlocking devices or by simply overlapping,so
that the wings operate together.
Among the insects with two pairs of wings, the wings may work separately as in
the dragonflies and damselflies. But in higher pterygote insects, fore and hind
wings are coupled together as a unit, so that both pairs move synchronously. By
coupling the wings the insects become functionally two winged.
AMPLEXIFORM COUPLING:
The posterior margin of the forewing and the anterior margin of the hindwing
overlap and couple with each other by incurling of the margins. E.g. butterflies
HAMULATE COUPLING:
The anterior margin of the hindwing is provided with a row of small, curved
hook-like structures called ‘hamuli’. The inner margin of the forewing is folded.
While flying ,the hooks fasten into the fold of the forewing and thus coupling is
effected. E.g. bees
Male frenate: hindwing bears near the base of the costal margin a stout bristle
called frenulum which is normally held by a curved process, retinaculum arising
from the subcostal vein fond on the surface of the forewing.
Female frenate: hindwing bears near the base of the costal margin a group of
stout bristle(frenulum) which lies beneath extended forewing and engages there
in a retinaculum formed by a patch of hairs near cubitus.
JUGATE:
Jugam of the fore wing are lobe like and its locked to the costal margin of the
hindwings e.g. Hepialid moths
JUGO-FRENATE: e.g. micropterigidae (lepidoptera), mecoptera
(scorpionfly)
FOLD/ HOOK LIKE: two wings are folded together forming a hook or fold.
e.g. thripidae (thrips)
MODIFICATION IN DIFFERENT ORDERS OF INSECT:
Apterygota:
Pterygota:
Basal part of halter called scabellum and apex part called capitellum.
• Indirect: not attached to the wing but to the notum (dorsal) and sternum
(ventral)
• The wings are then brought down by a contraction of muscles that attach
to the wing outside of the pivot point.
• In butterflies and moths, beetles, grasshoppers, roaches, dragon flies and
others, the downstroke is powered by the direct flight muscles in
conjunction With the relaxation of the indirect muscles
• Indirect flight muscles are found in more advanced insects such as true
flies.
• Indirect flight muscles are connected to the upper (tergum) and lower
(sternum) surfaces of the insect thorax. A second set of muscles attach to
the front and back of the thorax.
• The wings are raised by the muscles attached to the upper and lower
surface of the thorax contracting. This brings the top surface of the thorax
down and, along with it, the base of the wings.
• As a result the wing tips pivot upwards. The wings are then lowered by a
contraction of the muscles attached to the front and rear of the thorax.
• This forces the upper surface of the thorax to raise and the wings pivot
downwards.
In insects such as bees, wasps, and flies the downstroke is also achieved by
indirect muscles called the dorsal longitudinal muscles
REFERENCE:
Brisson, J. A.; Ishikawa, A.; Miura, T. (2010) Wing development genes of the
pea aphid and differential gene expression between winged and
unwinged morphs. Insect Molecular Biology , 19(s2), 63-73
Chougale, T. M. and Sathe, T. V. (2009) Mating behavior in Apanteles baoris
Wilkinson (Hymenoptera : Braconidae), an internal parasitoid of
Chapra mathias Fabriceous (Lepidoptera : Hesperiidae. Journal of
Experimental Zoology, India, 12(1), 65-67
Kati, A. and Hardie, J. (2010) Inhibiting aphid wing development : Is immune
challenge important? Physiological Entomology, 35(1), 82-86
Khiaban, N. G. M. Z.; Nejad, K. H. I.; Hejazi, M. S.; Mohammadi, S. A.;
Sokhandan, N. (2010) A geometric morphometric study on the host
populations of the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera :
Noctuidae) in some parts of Iran. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 5(1),
140-147
Mckechnie, S. W.; Blacket, M.J.; Song, S. V.; Rako, L.; Caroll, X.; Johnson, T.
K.; Jensen, L. T.; Lee, S. F.; Wee, C. W.; Hoffmann, A. A. (2010) A
clinally varying promoter polymorphism associated with adaptive
variation in wing size in Drosophila. Molecular Ecology, 19(4), 775-
784
Ramesha, B. (2015) Notes on the Baridine weevil genus Acythopeus
(Coleoptera : Curcurlionidae) from India. Indian Journal of
Entomology, 77(4), 363-382.
Talloen, W.; Dongen, S. Van.; Dyck, H. Van.; Lens, L. (2009) Environmental
stress and quantitative genetic variation in butterfly wing
characteristics. Evolutionary Ecology, 23(3), 473-485
Ai, H.; Yoshida, A.; Yokohari, F. (2010) Vibration receptive sensilla on the
wing margin of silkworm, Bombyx mori. Journal of Insect Physiology,
56(3), 236-246
Aleman, J.; Ravelo, J.; Duarte, L.; Miranda, I. (2009) Wing morphometry of
Cuban Anastrepha obliqua, fruit flies : differentiation from other
Latin American Anastrepha fraterculus populations. Boletin de la
S.E.A. (Sociedad Entomologica Argonesa), 45, 556-569
BOOKS: