Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 43

TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

(Constituted under section 82 (1) of the Electricity Act, 2003)


(Central Act 36 of 2003)

PRESENT:-

Thiru S.Akshayakumar …. Chairman

Thiru G.Rajagopal …. Member


and
Dr.T.Prabhakara Rao …. Member

M.P.No.10 of 2016

In the matter of: Approval of Capital Investment Plan filed by Tamil Nadu
Transmission Corporation Limited (TANTRANSCO) for the Control Period from
FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19

Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation Limited.,


Represented by Chief Engineer/Transmission,
144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. …Petitioner
(Thiru. M. Gopinathan
Standing Counsel for TANTRANSCO)
Vs.
Nil …Respondent

Dates of hearing: 25.04.2016, 02.06.2016, 29.08.2016, 29.12.2016

Date of Order: 31-07-2017

The Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred as

“TANTRANSCO” or “the Petitioner”) filed the Capital Investment Plan (hereinafter

referred as “CIP”) for the MYT Control Period from FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19 in

Page 1 of 30
M.P. No. 10 of 2016. The Petition came up for final hearing on 29.12.2016. The

Commission upon perusing the above petition and other connected records and after

hearing the submissions of the Petitioner hereby makes the following:

ORDER
1. Prayer of TANTRANSCO

TANTRANSCO has prayed before the Commission as under:

“The CIP for the FY 2016-17 for Rs. 2823.40 crores, for the FY 2017-18 for
Rs. 2926 crores and for the FY 2018-19 for Rs. 3945 crores is now filed and
may be approved and to issue any other order as this Hon’ble Commission
deems fit.”

In exercise of the powers conferred under Sections 62 and 64 and other

provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred as “the Act” or “the EA,

2003”), read with Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and

Conditions for the determination of Tariff) Regulations, 2005 (hereinafter referred as

“Tariff Regulations”) and TNERC (Terms and conditions for Determination of Tariff

for Intra State Transmission/Distribution of the Electricity under MYT Framework)

Regulations, 2009 (hereinafter referred as “MYT Regulations”), the Commission has

carefully considered the submissions of the Petitioner and stakeholders and passes

the following Order.

TANTRANSCO was formed by transferring of assets of erstwhile Tamil Nadu

Electricity Board (TNEB) vide Provisional Transfer Scheme Notification dated

October 19, 2010 from November 1, 2010. Since then, the Petitioner has been in the

business of Transmission of electricity in the State of Tamil Nadu. TANTRANSCO is

the designated State Transmission Utility (STU) in Tamil Nadu, providing

Page 2 of 30
Transmission services to TANGEDCO, Captive and Open Access (OA) Customers.

2. Submissions of the Petitioner

2.1. The Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation Ltd. (TANTRANSCO) is engaged

in the transmission of power generated from the generating stations to distribution

centres (under TANGEDCO) with the help of transmission network (GRID). The

transmission network consists of sub-stations and its associated lines of various

voltage levels. Based on the capacity and location of the addition of generation

capacity and quantum and area of demand in the distribution side, augmentation of

transmission system by creating new network and upgrading the existing system, it

is essential to ensure that adequate Transmission System is available with

redundancy. As on 31.03.15, TANTRANSCO was having a Transmission network

comprising 1436 sub-stations of voltage rating 66 kV and above and 28701.31 ckt

kms of EHT lines. During FY 2015-16, 67 Nos. sub-stations with a capacity of 2597

MVA, 1962.839 ckt Kms of EHT Lines and 141 Nos. power transformers with a

capacity of 1852.50 MVA towards additional/enhancement in the existing

substations, have been commissioned.

2.2. The installed generation capacity as on April 1, 2016 was 14,786 MW

including Hydro, Thermal, Gas, Share from CGS, IPP and CPP. The installed

capacity of renewable energy sources was 9,629.52 MW. The addition in generating

capacity has been planned by forecasting the increase in demand for power at

approximately 7% per annum. The capacity addition planned up to FY 2019-20 for

Page 3 of 30
Thermal Projects is shown in the following Table:

Table 1: Capacity Addition in Thermal Projects


Sl. Anticipated Capacity
Name of the Project
No. period (MW)
1 ETPS Supercritical Expansion Project (1x 660 MW) FY 2017-18 660
2 Ennore SEZ STPS (2 x 660 MW) FY 2017-18 1320
Total 1980
3 Neyveli New TPP at Neyveli (Central) - (2 x 500 MW) FY 2018-19 1000
Total 1000
4 Replacement of Ennore TPS (1 x 660 MW) FY 2019-20 660
5 NCTPP Stage III (1 x 800MW) FY 2019-20 800
Udangudi Super Critical Thermal Power Project (2 x 660 FY 2019-20
6 1320
MW)
7 Uppur TPP (2 x 800MW) at Ramanathapuram District FY 2019-20 1600
Total 4380

2.3. The projected demand as on April 1, 2016 was 14,538 MW, and the demand

is expected to grow to 17,810 MW by FY 2018-19. The transmission planning plays

a vital role in any Transmission Utility to ensure that adequate and reliable

transmission system is in place to cope with the capacity addition in generation and

the demand for power in the distribution side. The revised Tariff Policy dated January

28, 2016, has stated the objective of ensuring optimal development of transmission

network ahead of generation with adequate margin for reliability and to promote

efficient utilization of generation and transmission assets. Keeping in view the above

objective, the transmission planning is carried out considering the following factors

subject to technical, economic and environmental considerations:

(i) Generation capacity addition


(ii) Demand growth
(iii) Present transmission constraints and congestion

Page 4 of 30
(iv) Reliability
(v) Redundancy for operational flexibility
(vi) Line loss reduction

2.3. The Petitioner has designed transmission schemes taking into account the

technical, economical, and environmental considerations and has accordingly

submitted year-wise Capital Investment Plan for Rs.2823.40 Crore, Rs.2926 Crore

and Rs.3945 Crore for FY 2016-17, FY 2017-18, and FY 2018-19, respectively.

2.4. The following Table summarises the Capital Expenditure and Capitalisation of

Transmission Schemes for the Control Period from FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19 as

submitted by the Petitioner:

Page 5 of 30
Table 2: Capital Expenditure and Capitalisation proposed by TANTRANSCO (Rs. Crore)

Sl. Capital Expenditure Capitalisation


Particulars
No. FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
I. Sub-station works
1 765 kV Sub-stations 100.00 375.00 1,030.00 - 212.15 424.29
2 400 kV Sub-stations 385.00 410.00 1,200.00 990.80 974.91 1,099.94
3 230 kV Sub-stations 253.00 694.00 605.00 59.25 206.59 791.03
4 110 kV Sub-stations 415.50 327.00 310.00 159.59 372.39 239.08
5 Sub Total 1,153.50 1,806.00 3,145.00 1,209.64 1,766.03 2,554.35
II Transmission Line works
1 Link Lines - 400 KV and 230 KV 17.00 - - 113.22 242.92 154.76
Power Evacuation Lines - 400 KV, 230 KV and 110
2 52.90 115.00 100.00 129.38 91.41 20.84
KV
3 Improvement Lines - 230 KV and 110 KV 220.00 100.00 150.00 164.64 163.15 132.12
4 Sub Total 289.90 215.00 250.00 407.24 497.48 307.72
III Others
1 Enhancement / Additional Power Transformers 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00 150.00
2 TANTRANSCO Building 10.00 5.00 - - 16.00 4.00
3 Capacitor Bank 20.00 - 16.00 4.00
4 JICA Scheme 600.00 300.00 300.00 600.00 300.00 300.00
5 kfW Schemes 600.00 450.00 100.00 - 263.70 513.09
6 Sub Total 1,380.00 905.00 550.00 766.00 733.70 967.09
IV Grand Total 2,823.40 2,926.00 3,945.00 2,382.88 2,997.21 3,829.16

Page 6 of 30
2.5. The Petitioner submitted that North Chennai area has become the power

generation hub. Four (4) new thermal projects with an installed capacity of 3,440 MW

are proposed in North Chennai area. The Petitioner has proposed to evacuate this bulk

power at 765 kV level. The administrative approval has been accorded for 765 kV GIS

pooling station at North Chennai, with connectivity to the already sanctioned 765 kV

Ariyalur AIS Substation and 400 kV Pulianthope GIS Substation. The 765 kV North

Chennai pooling station is planned to be completed by FY 2019-20. It is further

submitted that the tender is to be floated again for the 400 kV Pulianthope GIS

substation.

2.6. Further, 765 kV Ariyalur substation is proposed to distribute the generated power

and the power sourced from other States effectively, with connectivity to 765 kV

Thiruvalam PGCIL substation. The tender is under process for 765 KV Ariyalur

Substation. The work is under progress for 765 kV line from Thiruvalam to Ariyalur. The

765 kV Ariyalur substation is expected to be completed by FY 2018-19.

2.7. The Petitioner further submitted that the administrative approval has been

accorded for another 765 kV substation at Coimbatore with connectivity to North

Chennai 765 kV substation. The land is being identified for establishment of 765 kV

Coimbatore substation. Further, 765 kV Virudunagar substation is proposed for

evacuation of about 1980 MW from Udangudi Complex, i.e., 1320 MW MW (2x660 MW)

from Udangudi STPP and 660 MW (1x660 MW from Udangudi Stage II with

connectivity to 765 kV Ariyalur substation and 765 kV Coimbatore substation. The

substation will be commissioned in co-ordination with commissioning of the project.

Page 7 of 30
2.8. Thus, a 765 kV network is being formed with establishment of four (4) 765 kV

substations at North Chennai, Ariyalur, Coimbatore and Virudunagar with associated

765 kV lines for transfer of bulk power from generating stations and for transfer of inter-

State power with downstream connectivity for effective distribution of generated power.

2.9. Further, for evacuating power of about 730 MW from private generators in

Gummudipoondi area, a 400 kV substation is proposed at Thervaikandigai with

connectivity to the proposed 400 kV Manali substation and 400 kV Korattur substation.

The 400 kV Thervaikandigai substation is back charged at 230 kV level on April 15,

2016. Further, 400 kV line works are under progress and the substation at 400 kV level

is planned to be completed by FY 2016-17.

2.10. The Petitioner submitted that Tamil Nadu, being a pioneer in promoting

Renewable Energy (RE) owing to its huge potential of wind along with other forms of

RE including Solar, has planned its transmission infrastructure to match with the

ambitious RE capacity addition. The estimated RE addition in the next five years will be

around 8,000 MW. The details are as under:

(a) For evacuation of about 3,000 MW wind power in Theni and Udumalpet

districts, three new 400 kV substations at Thappagundu, Anikadavu and

Rasipalayam with associated 400 kV lines of 788 ckt-km are proposed. The

works are under progress for these substations. The 400 kV line from

Thappagundu to Anikadavu and Anikadavu to Rasipalayam has been

completed. Further, 400 kV line from Rasipalayam to 400 kV Dharmapuri

(Palavadi) substation is under progress. This transmission system will be

Page 8 of 30
commissioned during FY 2016-17.

(b) Further, two (2) substations are proposed at Kanarpatty and Thennampatty

for evacuation of wind power in Tirunelveli area. The Kanarpatty substation

and its associated lines are planned to be completed by 2 nd week of January

2017. The works are under progress for 400 kV Thennampatty substation,

which will be commissioned during FY 2017-18. The above substations and

lines will be used beneficially for load transfer in both directions, i.e., during

wind and non-wind seasons.

(c) Further, erection of second 400 kV D/C line from 400 kV Rasipalayam

substation – 400 kV Dharmapuri (Palavadi) substation is also proposed under

KfW funding. The works are under progress. These two double-circuit 400 kV

lines will enable power flow to load centres of Coimbatore, Salem and Vellore

regions throughout the year effectively. LILO of one circuit of Thappagundu-

Anaikadavu 400 kV D/C line at 400/230 kV Udumalpet PGCIL substation will

also be beneficial for Coimbatore region. Tender is under process for above

line work.

2.11. As regards power evacuation from Solar Sources, the Petitioner submitted that

establishment of 400 kV substation at Kamudhi and 230 kV substation at

Muthuramalingapuram are proposed for evacuation of about 3,000 MW of solar power

in Ramnad, Pudukkottai and Virudhunagar districts. 400 kV Kamudhi substation was

commissioned on September 8, 2016. The works for 230 kV Muthuramalingapuram

substation are under progress. The substation is also planned to be completed by FY

2016-17.

Page 9 of 30
2.12. A 400 kV substation at Vellalaviduthi in Pudukkottai district is also proposed for

solar power evacuation and is expected to be commissioned in FY 2018-19.

Considering the already proposed and future expected addition of RE generation in

Tamil Nadu network, the Petitioner has proposed to establish 400 kV substations, viz.,

Samugarengapuram in Tirunelveli area and Ottapidaram in Tuticorin area for

evacuation of wind/solar energy in addition to the private power generation at

Ottapidaram.

2.13. As major portion of the capacity addition of RE generation is proposed near

Kamudhi, Rameshwaram, Thiruchuli and Pudukkottai area, the solar and wind power

generated in Tirunelveli area shall be pooled at Virudunagar 765 kV substation for

transferring to load centres.

2.14. Considering the demand growth rate of 7%, various proposals for establishment

of substations up to 400 kV level are planned and executed. In addition to the projected

load growth, the schemes are designed to ease present congestion and to improve

redundancy to reasonable extent enabling operational flexibility.

2.15. While focussing on Chennai region with its rapidly growing demand, three (3)

nos. of 400 kV substations at Manali, Sholinganallur and Korattur have been proposed

in the periphery of Chennai city. Also, two (2) nos. of substation at Guindy and

Taramani have been proposed in the heart of the city. The works are under progress for

400 kV Manali substation and 400 kV Sholinganallur substation. These substations are

Page 10 of 30
planned to be commissioned during FY 2016-17. The tender is under process for 400

kV Guindy substation. The tender is to be floated for 400 kV Korattur substation and

400 kV Tharamani substation. In addition to this, seven (7) nos. of 230 kV substations

are proposed out of which, works are under progress for five (5) substations at

Ambattur 3rd Main Road, Central CMRL, R.A. Puram, Mambalam and Porur. The re-

tender is to be floated for one 230 kV GIS substation at TNEB Head Quarters and

tender to be floated for one 230 kV substation at Thiruvanmiyur. The associated

downstream substation and lines are designed keeping in view of the following:

(a) Evacuation hub for the State/Private power plants with connectivity to major
400 kV substations of Chennai city.
(b) Effective load management of Chennai city.
(c) Meeting out the vital loads of Government buildings, industrial, metro rail, IT
parks, educational institutions and the concentrated loads of domestic,
commercial establishments.
(d) To resolve the present congestion, improve reliability of supply to the heart of
Chennai city and to facilitate operational flexibilities.

For other regions, details of 400 kV and 230 kV substations are tentatively

proposed to meet out the load growth, obliviate the existing overloading constraints,

provide reliability and improve voltage regulation in the downstream, as furnished

below:

Table 3: Schemes under Execution, sanctioned and proposed by TANTRANSCO


Schemes
Schemes under
sanctioned and
Region execution/Commissioned Schemes proposed
work to be taken
during FY 2016-17
up
Edayarpalayam
Karamadai 400 kV SS 400 kV SS,
Kalivelampatty, Negamam
(Commissioned), Poolavady 230 kV
and Elumathur 230 kV
Coimbatore Kurukathi, Tiruppur and SS and
substations
Shenbagapudur 230 kV Selvapuram 230
substations kV SS.

Page 11 of 30
Kondagai, Arasanur, Periyar
Kinnimangalam 230 kV Samayanallur
Madurai PH, Usilampatty and K.
SS 230 kV SS
Pudur 230 kV substations
Erode, Edapady and
Erode Valayapatty 230 kV SS
Karuppur 230 kV substations
Kumbakonam, Poiyur,
Thuvakudi and
Jambunathapuram,
Trichy Narimanam 230 Velliyanai 230 kV SS.
Mondipatti 230 kV
kV substations.
substations.
Gangaikondan (Thalayuthu),
Tirunelveli Savasapuram 230 kV SS Srivilliputhur/Virudunagar
230 kV SS
Uddanapally and Sathumadurai,
Tirupathur 230 kV Viswanathapuram IT Park
Vellore
substations. and Denkanikottai 230 kV
Substations
Sankarapuram and
Purisai 230 kV SS
Villupuram Neyveli 230 kV
(Commissioned)
substations
Chennai
Kanchipuram 230 kV SS.
South

Further, downstream 110 kV substations near distribution load centres are

proposed to reduce the overloading in the existing substations, improve the voltage

regulation, meet the EHT demand, extend 33 kV source to proposed 33 kV substations,

etc. The addition and enhancement of power transformers in the existing substations

are also taken up to ensure optimum loading of the substations, provide adequate

system support for load development in the area and to improve the quality of power

supply.

2.16. The Petitioner added that there will be saving in line loss relatively due to

establishment of substations in the range of 1-4 MW, based on the load flow analysis.

TANTRANSCO is taking all efforts to reduce the transmission losses by constantly

upgrading the existing system, strengthening the existing aged transmission lines with

higher capacity conductors, standardisation of conductor sizes for various voltage levels

with Panther for 110 kV lines, Zebra for 230 kV lines, etc., replacement of old 110 kV

Page 12 of 30
and 230 kV lines with bunched conductors and Dog conductor in a phased manner.

2.17. The Petitioner submitted that the execution of some of the schemes has been

delayed. It is observed that the execution of 400 kV substations at Thappagundu and

Anikadvu, awarded to M/s BHEL, is getting delayed due to slow progress of work by the

contractor. The review meetings at Head Quarters and at field level are being

conducted to sort out the issues and expedite the work.

2.18. Further, 400 kV Sholinganallur (Ottiyambakkam) substation works are near

completion. The 400 kV line work from Kalivanthapattu to Sholinganallur

(Ottiyambakkam) is delayed due to repeated objection by various land owners, with

some of them filing suit in the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Judgment has been

delivered in favour of TANTRANSCO by Hon’ble Supreme Court and work has

commenced with police protection. In the meanwhile, again case was filed by some

land owners and is being followed up.

2.19. The Petitioner further submitted that even though 400 kV Kanarpatty substation

works have been completed, the commissioning is being delayed due to Right of Way

(RoW) issues in line work. As regards 400 kV line work from Kanarpatty to Kayathar,

the permission was requested from District Collector-Tuticorin due to severe objections

by land owners and the same is still awaited. In another line works from Kanarpatty to

Abishekapatty, the line is aligned through lake area and work could not be taken up for

quite some time due to heavy monsoon rains and water logging. Now, the work has

been completed and the substation has been commissioned on January 9, 2017.

Page 13 of 30
2.20. As regards 400 kV Karamadai substation, 400 kV line work is delayed due to

severe RoW issues, even though substation work has been completed. After close

follow up, line work was completed and the substation has been commissioned on

August 24, 2016. Delays are also being experienced in getting the required details from

District administration for payment of crop compensation. In respect of cable laying

works, work is getting delayed in obtaining permission from Corporation, Public Works

Department, National Highway Authority of India, Police Department, Forest

department, etc.

2.21. In view of the reasons stated above, there are slippages in completion schedule

for transmission schemes. All efforts are taken by TANTRANSCO at field level as well

as at Head Quarters level to resolve the issues and to commission the substations and

lines at the earliest.

2.22. The Petitioner submitted that the funds for financing the various transmission

schemes are being raised from various Financial Institutions such as REC, PFC, Tamil

Nadu Investment Promotion Programme (TNIPP), NABARD, Japan International

Cooperation Agency (JICA), etc. For creation of transmission infrastructure for RE,

financial assistance of 40% Grant under National Clean Energy Fund (NCEF) by

Government of India (GoI), 40% as soft loan from KfW German funding under Indo-

German Bilateral Cooperation, and 20% as equity by TANTRANSCO is approved. For

Transmission Line improvement works, funding is also being tied up with REC/PFC.

Page 14 of 30
3. Legal Provisions:-

3.1. The CIP submitted by TANTRANSCO has to be approved as per the relevant

provisions of the Tariff Policy, Tariff Regulations and MYT Regulations.

3.1.1. The relevant provisions of the Tariff Policy notified by Government of India on

January 6, 2016 with respect to the CIP are reproduced below:

“ 5.3 Tariff policy lays down … …

a) Return on Investment
………
While allowing the total capital cost of the project, the Appropriate
Commission would ensure that these are reasonable and to achieve this
objective, requisite benchmarks on capital costs should be evolved by the
Regulatory Commissions.

b)to (f) … … … …
g) Renovation and Modernization
………
A multi-year tariff (MYT) framework may be prescribed which should also
cover capital investments necessary for renovation and modernization and
an incentive framework to share the benefits of efficiency improvement
between the utilities and the beneficiaries with reference to revised and
specific performance norms to be fixed by the Appropriate Commission.
Appropriate capital costs required for pre-determined efficiency gains
and/or for sustenance of high level performance would need to be
assessed by the Appropriate Commission. ……” (emphasis added)

3.1.2. Regulation 17 of the Terms and Conditions for determination of Tariff

Regulations, 2005 (Tariff Regulations) specifies as under:

“17. Capital Investment Plan


(1) The licensee shall file a detailed Capital Investment Plan every year
showing separately, ongoing projects that will spill into the year under
review and new project (along with justification) that will commence but
may be completed within or beyond the tariff period.

Page 15 of 30
(2) The Commission may consider the licensee’s investment plan for
approval and for this purpose, may require the licensees to provide
relevant technical and commercial details. The costs corresponding to the
approved investment plan of a licensee for a given year shall normally be
considered for its revenue requirement.
(3) In presenting the justification for new projects, the licensee shall detail
the specific nature of the works and the results to be achieved. The details
must be shown in physical parameter (e.g.) new capacity to be added,
length of lines to be energised, number of sub-stations / Bays to be added,
meters to be added, replaced, etc. so that it is amenable for physical
verification. In case of significant shortfall in achieving physical targets,
the Commission may require the licensee to explain the reasons, and may
proportionately reduce the provision, including interest and return
component made towards revenue requirement, in the next tariff proposal.
(4) The licensee may, at any time, during the tariff year, seek provision for
additional capital expenditure to meet natural calamities involving
substantial investment and the Commission shall examine and review
these provisions in the manner as given in this regulation and approve
their inclusion in the revenue requirement in the next period.
(5) The licensee shall get the Capital Investment Plan approved by the
Commission before filing ARR and Application for determination of
tariff.”

3.1.3. Regulation 3 (v) of the Terms and Conditions for determination of Tariff for

Transmission/Distribution of Electricity (under MYT framework) Regulations, 2009 (MYT

Regulations) specifies as follows:-

“Chapter II, 3) v). Capital Investment Plan:

The licensee shall get the approval of the Capital Investment Plan for
each year of the initial control period in accordance with the Regulation 17 of
TNERC Tariff Regulations. It may be ensured that the approval of the
Commission is obtained before tariff filing under MYT framework. The capital
investment plan shall have capitalization schedules for each year of the control
period.

The source of finance to meet the capital expenditure in each year of the
control period shall also be furnished along with Capital Investment Plan.”

3.1.4. Further, the Hon’ble APTEL in its Judgment dated October 18, 2014 in Appeal

No. 197 of 2013 filed by TANTRANSCO against the Tariff Order 1 of 2013 had given

Page 16 of 30
certain directions regarding the approval of CIP. After taking cognizance of such

directions, the Commission in the Suo-motu Tariff Order dated December 11, 2014

directed TANTRANSCO as under:

“4.21 TANTRANSCO has submitted the provisional details of capital


expenditure and capitalization for the FY 2014-15 to the Commission but
there is no adequate information on sources of funding, board details and
physical quantum of the proposed capital expenditure.

4.22. This Commission directs TANTRANSCO to reconcile its account


with respect to capital expenditure and submit the scheme wise
information in the requisite formats. Commission also directs
TANTRANSCO to file the progress of the capital expenditure and
capitalization on a quarterly basis.”

3.2. TANTRANSCO filed the Miscellaneous Petition on November 25, 2014 for

approval of its CIP for FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16 (M. P. No. 54 of 2014). After due

verification and scrutiny of the Petition, the Commission vide Order dated June 28,

2016 approved the CIP for TANTRANSCO for FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16.

4. Procedure adopted

TANTRANSCO submitted its Petition for approval of CIP for the Control Period

from FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19 on 06.04.2016 and registered as M.P. No. 10 of 2016.

The Commission held a preliminary hearing in the matter on, April 25, 2016. During the

hearing, the Petition was admitted, and the Petitioner was directed to file the additional

affidavit detailing the projected demand and generation growth, expected load centre

and generation hubs and transmission schemes required to meet the same including

redundancy for ensuring reliability, improvement of the existing network, reduction in

line loss, etc.

Page 17 of 30
5. TANTRANSCO submitted its additional affidavit with details as directed by the

Commission on 27.06.2016. The Commission, vide Order dated 29.12.2016, directed

TANTRANSCO to upload the Petition on its website to invite comments and

suggestions from the stakeholders.

6. No written comments have been received from any stakeholder on

TANTRANSCO’s CIP Petition. Since, FY 2016-17 is already over, the Commission

asked TANTRANSCO to submit the updated status of capital expenditure incurred and

capitalisation achieved, to facilitate a realistic estimate of capital expenditure and

capitalisation for FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19. The Commission has analysed the final

proposals for transmission schemes for the Control Period from FY 2016-17 to FY

2018-19.

5. Findings of the Commission:-

5.1. The Commission notes that the Petitioner has submitted the transmission

scheme-wise details for the Control Period from FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19. The

Petitioner has filed the CIP in accordance with Regulation 17 of the Tariff Regulations.

The transmission schemes include the On-going schemes, which are started prior to

commencement of the Control Period and new schemes, which are going to be started

during the Control Period.

5.2. Since FY 2016-17 is already over, the Commission has considered the revised

phasing of capital expenditure for such schemes based on status submitted by

TANTRANSCO. The Commission has analysed the details submitted by the Petitioner

Page 18 of 30
for each scheme. The Petitioner has submitted the cost of capital works based on the

initially approved cost by the Board of TANTRANSCO. For schemes for which the

approval of Board of TANTRANSCO is awaited, the cost based on the scheme DPR

has been submitted. For the purpose of the approval, the Commission has considered

the cost of the scheme as approved by the Board of TANTRANSCO.

5.3. The Commission in the last Order on approval of CIP had approved the Capital

expenditure only. However, in the present Order, the Commission approves the Capital

expenditure as well as capitalisation based on project cost, phasing and anticipated

completion of the schemes.

5.4. As regards the 765 kV level substation schemes, the Petitioner has proposed

four (4) nos. of 765 kV Substations, viz., Ariyalur, North Chennai Pooling Station,

Coimbatore and Virudhnagar. Out of this, the Board Approval for 765 kV Virudhnagar

Substation is awaited and no capital expenditure for the said scheme was projected.

The Commission accepts the submission of the Petitioner and has not considered the

capital expenditure towards 765 kV Virudhnagar Substation. After taking into account

the present status of other substation works, the Commission has considered the

capital expenditure and capitalisation as submitted by TANTRANSCO.

5.5. As regards 400 kV level substation schemes funded by Japan International

Corporation Agency (JICA), the Petitioner has proposed five (5) nos. of 400 kV

substations, viz., Sholinganallur (Ottiyambakkam), Karamadai, Manali, Korattur and

Guindy. The Commission has considered the scheme-wise capital expenditure based

Page 19 of 30
on the details provided by the Petitioner. The Commission has considered the

scheduled completion of Korattur and Guindy substations in FY 2018-19, and other

substations in FY 2016-17 and FY 2017-18, considering the present progress of the

works. As regards 400 kV level substation schemes funded by sources other than JICA,

the Petitioner has proposed 400 kV substations at various locations, viz.,

Thervaikandigai, Thappagundu, Anikadavu, Rasipalayam, Dharmapuri (Palavady),

Kanarpatty, Pulianthope, Vellalavidudhi (Pudukkottai), Edayarpalayam, Tharamani

(Upgradation) and Kolappalur. Out of these schemes, the Board Approval is awaited for

400 kV Kolappalur substation. The Commission has considered the capital expenditure

required at initial stage of the project, i.e., Rs. 5 Crore in FY 2017-18 and Rs. 50 Crore

in FY 2018-19. For other schemes, the capital expenditure and capitalisation have been

considered based on present progress of the work and anticipated completion

schedule.

5.6. As regards 400 kV transmission lines scheme, the Petitioner has proposed

transmission lines scheme for link lines, power evacuation lines and improvement lines.

The Commission has considered the capital expenditure based on present progress of

the schemes.

5.7. The Commission notes that in the CIP Petition, the Petitioner has submitted

lumpsum provision towards capital expenditure and capitalisation for schemes funded

by JICA and KfW. The Commission sought scheme-wise Capital Expenditure and

Capitalisation against each of the JICA and KfW schemes. After perusing the details of

the project cost, status of the project and the anticipated completion of the project, the

Page 20 of 30
Commission observes that the capitalisation figures are not proportionate to the

progress of work. It is seen that a few schemes under JICA funding that have been

charged/commissioned during 2016-17 have not been capitalised fully in the respective

year. The Commission has considered actual capitalisation of the individual schemes

submitted by the petitioner subsequently for FY 2016-17 and allowed the balance cost

in the subsequent years. Hence, the capitalisation approved by the Commission is

lower for FY 2016-17 and on the higher side for FY 2017-18 as against that proposed

by the Petitioner. Regarding KfW funded schemes, the Commission observes that as

the schemes are under progress, the Petitioner has proposed lower capitalisation for

FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19 only. The Commission has considered the capitalisation

based on progress of work and hence, the capitalisation approved by the Commission

is higher than the capitalisation proposed by the Petitioner.

5.8. Further, as regards 230 kV Substation schemes, the Commission notes that

Board Approval is yet to be accorded for some of the schemes, hence, the Commission

has considered the capital expenditure for such scheme based on the submissions

made by the Petitioner and status of implementation. As regards the 110 kV substation

schemes, the Commission has considered the ongoing schemes as submitted by the

Petitioner. For the Control Period, the Petitioner has submitted the total expenditure for

40 Nos. of substations. The Commission sought the list of 110 kV substations to be

undertaken during the Control Period along with cost details. Based on this, the

Commission has approved the capital expenditure and capitalisation towards 110 kV

substation schemes. Accordingly, the schemes proposed by the Petitioner and

Commission’s observations have been duly deliberated in Annexure 1. The capital

Page 21 of 30
expenditure and capitalisation has been approved by the Commission considering the

status of the project, scope of work, technical justification, cost of project, etc.

5.9. As regards the execution of the projects, the Commission notes that the

Petitioner has submitted the various issues involved in execution of works such as filing

of case by land owners, ROW issues, permissions from Government Departments, etc.

Regarding the delay in implementation of the schemes, the Commission in Order dated

June 28, 2016 regarding approval of CIP for FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16 has observed

as under:

“19.1.3 On going through the details of the capital works submitted by


TANTRANSCO, it is seen that there is a huge time gap between initial
approval date of the scheme and taking up of work and award of works.
Also there is again a time over run from award date to completion of the
schemes. For example, Palakkapalayam which has been initially
approved during 2008, was actually completed during 08/2014 only. This
is also observed in most of the 230 kV substation schemes such as
Anthiyur, Guindy, Karamadai, Thingalur, Ulundurpet, Singapuram etc.
Though the Utility is well aware that delayed implementation / completion
of the schemes reflects on the costs, the initiative taken by the Utility to
ensure speedy completion of capital works is far from satisfactory.”

5.10. After going through the details of schemes submitted by the Petitioner, the

Commission has observed huge time gap between the initial approval of scheme and

execution of work in this Petition also. For example, the Board Approval for 400 kV

Sholinganallur (Ottiyambakkam) Substation was accorded on April 11, 2007, however,

the actual work completion date proposed is March 31, 2017. Similarly, Board Approval

for 230 kV Kancheepuram Substation was accorded on June 15, 2011,however, actual

work completion is proposed as March 31, 2017. Likewise, there is a mismatch

Page 22 of 30
between the sub-station works and its associated line works in certain sub-station

schemes i.e either the sub-station works have been completed but line works are under

progress or vice versa.

5.11. Transmission Licensee cites Right of way issues and litigations by contractors on

whom certain works have been awarded as the main reasons for the delay in execution

of the projects. However, we have also noticed that there is lack of coordination and

synchronization in taking up the sub-station works and associated line works, tenders

getting multiple times lodged causing undue delay in taking up approved schemes

contributing to delays. TANTRANSCO with rich experience and expertise in the field

must be able to complete the projects/schemes well within the scheduled time line with

occasional exceptions owing to some unanticipated external factors. We, therefore,

direct TANTRANSCO to take proactive measures to ensure the timely completion of

transmission schemes.

This Commission would also like to point out that the petitioner shall ensure that

each element of the transmission system whenever taken up for construction is

thoroughly analysed and necessity established. Though the Commission is aware that

the investments proposed by TANTRANSCO for establishing 230 kV and 110 kV sub-

stations are primarily to meet the increasing demand, to avoid overloading of the nearby

sub stations, to accommodate future loads and reduce loss, the Utility shall refrain from

proposing and taking up establishment of 110/11 kV sub-stations as a matter of routine

and let the distribution licensee viz. TANGEDCO to propose more 33 kV sub-stations.

This will result in reduction in line losses for both TANTRANSCO and TANGEDCO.

Therefore as a rule TANTRANSCO shall consider 110/11 kV sub-stations only in case

Page 23 of 30
where the 11 kV loads to an extent of not less than 10 MW is consumed within a radius

of say 5 Kms. This rule will be applicable to this order also even though the

Commission has approved all the schemes proposed by the petitioner.

5.12. The Commission, in this Order, has accorded the approval of capital

expenditure for each transmission scheme separately. Hence, for transmission

schemes commencing during the Control Period, i.e., April 1, 2016 onwards, the

Commission directs TANTRANSCO to submit the year-wise actual capital

expenditure incurred along with detailed justification for delay, if any, at time of

approval of actual capital expenditure and capitalisation. Further, the

Commission directs TANTRANSCO to maintain the record for the scheme-wise

actual capital expenditure incurred and actual capitalisation done separately for

the schemes commencing after April, 2016, which shall be submitted to the

Commission at the time of next Tariff Petition. The Commission shall approve the

actual Capital expenditure and actual capitalisation based on such scheme-wise

information, subject to prudence check.

5.13. The Petitioner has submitted the scheme-wise cost benefit analysis and

justification. The Petitioner has submitted the benefits towards the proposed Capital

works such as evacuation of power from renewable sources, reduction in transmission

losses, optimal loading for substation/substation equipment, improvement in voltage

regulation of transmission system, etc.

5.14. The Commission notes that the Act mandates that the primary function of State

Page 24 of 30
Transmission Utility (STU) is to ensure development of an efficient, coordinated and

economical system of intra-State transmission lines for smooth flow of electricity from a

generating station to the load centres and to provide non-discriminatory open access to

its transmission system for use by any Licensee or Generating Company or any

consumer on payment of the Transmission Charges. Also, the Tariff Policy, 2016

stipulates that:-

(a) STU should undertake network expansion after identifying the requirements
in consonance with the National Electricity Plan and in consultation with
stakeholders, and taking up the execution after due regulatory approvals. For
smooth operation of the grid, efforts should be made to develop transmission
system ahead of generation;
(b) STU should ensure upgrading of transmission systems to avoid the situations
of overloading, as the additional flows above a level of line loading lead to
significantly higher losses. The Appropriate Commission should permit
adequate capital investments in new assets for upgrading the transmission
system.
5.15. In the proposed CIP, the Petitioner has proposed the transmission Schemes for

evacuation of power from thermal generating stations and RE sources, network

expansion and system strengthening, establishment of 230/110 kV network primarily to

meet the increasing demand, to avoid overloading of the nearby sub stations, to

accommodate future loads, reduce line loss, etc.

5.16. The Commission appreciates that TANTRANSCO’s primary duty is to establish

and maintain reliable transmission network across the State in order to cater to the

needs of the consumers of the State and to operate its transmission system in the most

economical manner. The Petitioner is required to ensure that each element of the

transmission system whenever taken up for construction is thoroughly analysed using

Page 25 of 30
modern facilities that are available in order to achieve the targeted reliability in an

economic manner.

5.17. As regards the quantification of losses, the Commission in its order dated

28-06-2016 in M.P.No. 54 of 2014 held as follows:-

“19.2.5. … … …
Another important aspect that the Utility shall consider is optimizing the
transmission losses. Optimisation of transmission loss necessarily
involves consideration of cost benefit. It is necessary that whenever a new
transmission scheme is proposed, the utility shall assess the transmission
loss before inclusion of the element and after inclusion of the same.
Similarly whenever a new improvement scheme is proposed, it is very
essential to quantify and compare the reduction in transmission loss that
would result on account of the commissioning of the proposed scheme vis
a vis the cost incurred for setting up the same.”

5.18. Considering the schemes proposed by the Petitioner in the present CIP, the

Commission re-iterates that TANTRANSCO should quantify and compare the reduction

in transmission loss that would result on account of commissioning of the proposed

scheme.

5.19. In view of this, the Commission directs the Petitioner to quantify the

reduction in transmission loss on account of commissioning of scheme and

submit such actual cost benefit analysis to the Commission along with details

such as scope of scheme, methodology adopted for quantification of losses,

reduction in transmission loss, cost incurred for such scheme, etc., after

completion of schemes on annual basis.

5.20. Based on the approval of Capital expenditure and Capitalisation as discussed in

earlier sections of this Order, the summary of the approved CIP is given in the following

Table:

Page 26 of 30
Table 4: Approved Capital Expenditure and Capitalisation for the Control Period from FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19 (Rs. Crore)

Capital Expenditure Capitalisation


Sl. Petition Approved by the Commission Petition Approved by the Commission
Particulars
No.
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
I. Substation works
1 765 kV Sub Stations 100.00 375.00 1,030.00 100.00 375.00 1,030.00 - 212.15 424.29 - - 212.15
2 400 kV Sub Stations 385.00 410.00 1,200.00 385.00 165.00 1,300.00 990.80 974.91 1,099.94 804.76 908.76 727.19
3 230 kV Sub Stations 253.00 694.00 605.00 253.00 684.00 470.00 59.25 206.59 791.03 59.25 206.59 719.03
4 110 kV Sub Stations 415.50 327.00 310.00 360.99 386.79 363.31 159.59 372.39 239.08 126.89 243.29 211.48
5 Sub Total 1,153.50 1,806.00 3,145.00 1,098.99 1,610.79 3,163.31 1,209.64 1,766.03 2,554.35 990.90 1,358.65 1,869.85
II Transmission Line works
1 Link Lines - 400 kV and 230 kV 17.00 - - 17.00 - - 113.22 242.92 154.76 - 330.47 175.27
Power Evacuation Lines - 400 kV, 230 kV
2 52.90 115.00 100.00 12.00 90.90 75.00 129.38 91.41 20.84 128.61 57.43 46.91
and 110 kV
3 Improvement Lines - 230 kV and 110 kV 220.00 100.00 150.00 220.00 100.00 150.00 164.64 163.15 132.12 160.00 167.79 132.12
4 Sub Total 289.90 215.00 250.00 249.00 190.90 225.00 407.24 497.48 307.72 288.61 555.69 354.30
III Others
1 JICA Scheme 600.00 300.00 300.00 600.00 300.00 300.00 600.00 300.00 300.00 94.00 872.00 369.00
2 KfW Schemes 600.00 450.00 100.00 600.00 450.00 100.00 - 263.70 513.09 - 350.00 946.00
3 Other Schemes 180.00 155.00 150.00 160.00 170.00 155.00 166.00 170.00 154.00 110.00 126.00 104.00
4 Sub Total 1,380.00 905.00 550.00 1,360.00 920.00 555.00 766.00 733.70 967.09 204.00 1348.00 1,419.00
IV Grand Total 2,823.40 2,926.00 3,945.00 2707.99 2,721.69 3,943.31 2,382.88 2,997.21 3,829.16 1,483.51 3,262.34 3,643.15

Page 27 of 30
5.21. As regards the Capitalisation, many of the Ongoing schemes planned to be

completed by the end of FY 2016-17 have not been completed, hence, the Commission

has considered the capitalisation of such schemes in FY 2017-18. Hence, the approved

quantum of capitalisation for FY 2017-18 is higher than the capitalisation proposed by

the Petitioner.

5.22. The Petitioner has submitted that the funds for financing the various transmission

schemes are being raised from various Financial Institutions such as REC, PFC, Tamil

Nadu Investment Promotion Programme (TNIPP), NABARD, etc. JICA funding was

approved to the extent of Rs. 3572.93 Crore with an interest rate of 0.5% per annum.

Further, for creation of transmission infrastructure for RE worth Rs. 1593 Crore,

financial assistance of 40% Grant under National Clean Energy Fund (NCEF) by

Government of India (GoI) for Rs. 637.20 Crore, 40% as soft loan for Rs 637.20 Crore

from KfW German funding under Indo-German Bilateral Cooperation, and 20% as

equity by TANTRANSCO of Rs. 318.60 Crore is approved. For Transmission Line

improvement works, funding is also being tied up with REC/PFC.

5.23. The Commission notes that the Petitioner has submitted the funding source for

each scheme. As regards the schemes financed by REC/PFC, the Commission has

considered debt:equity in the ratio of 90:10. Also, in case of schemes financed by

NABARD, the debt:equity ratio has been considered as 80:20. For schemes for which

funding is yet to be tied up, the Commission has considered the funding in normative

debt:equity ratio of 70:30. As regards the scheme financed by JICA, the Commission

has considered 100% loan against such schemes. For the schemes financed under

Page 28 of 30
TNIPP, grant has been considered at 80% of amount of capital expenditure and

remaining amount of capital expenditure is considered to be funded through equity. As

regards KfW schemes, the Commission has considered 40% of amount of capital

expenditure as grant and loan each and remaining amount of capital expenditure is

considered to be funded through equity.

5.24. It is noted that there might be a situation where the Petitioner may receive the

grant for particular scheme upfront during the starting year of the scheme. However, in

the present Order, the Commission has considered the funding for capital expenditure

from grant, loan and equity in the same proportion. The Commission directs the

Petitioner to submit the actual source-wise funding for each transmission

scheme approved in this Order during the next Petition. The Commission shall

approve the actual funding of capital expenditure and capitalisation, after

prudence check.

5.25. The funding of capital expenditure approved by the Commission is shown in the

following Table:

Table 5: Approved Funding of Capital Expenditure for the Control Period from FY 2016-
17 to FY 2018-19 (Rs. Crore)

Approved by the Commission


Sr. No. Particulars
FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
1 Grant 27.20 124.00 180.00
2 Equity 414.30 420.97 654.33
3 Loan 2266.49 2176.72 3108.98
4 Total Capital expenditure 2,707.99 2,721.69 3,943.31

Page 29 of 30
5.26. In the light of the above, we issue the following directions:-

(a) For transmission schemes commencing during the Control Period from April
1, 2016, TANTRANSCO shall submit the year-wise actual capital expenditure
incurred along with detailed justification for delay, if any, at the time of
approval of actual capital expenditure and capitalisation.
(b) TANTRANSCO shall maintain the record for the scheme-wise actual capital
expenditure incurred and actual capitalisation done separately for the
schemes commencing after April, 2016, which shall be submitted to the
Commission at the time of next Tariff Petition. The Commission will approve
the actual Capital expenditure and actual capitalisation based on such
information, subject to prudence check.
(c) The Petitioner is directed to quantify the reduction in transmission loss on
account of commissioning of scheme and submit such cost benefit analysis
to the Commission along with details such as scope of scheme, methodology
adopted for quantification of losses, reduction in transmission loss, cost
incurred for such scheme, etc. after completion of schemes on annual basis.
(d) The Petitioner shall submit the actual source-wise funding for each
transmission scheme approved in this Order along with the next Tariff
Petition. The Commission will approve the actual funding of capital
expenditure and capitalisation, after prudence check.
6. Appeal

An appeal against this Order shall lie before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity
under section 111 of the Electricity Act 2003, within a period of 45 days from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order by the aggrieved person.

(Sd ........) (Sd......) (Sd........)


(Dr.T.Prabhakara Rao) (G.Rajagopal) (S.Akshayakumar)
Member Member Chairman

/ True Copy /

Secretary
Tamil Nadu Electricity
Regulatory Commission

Page 30 of 30
ANNEXURE 1
Initial Approved capital Cost
TANTRANSCO's Submission Approved by the Commission
Capacity for (Rs.Lakhs.) with B.P. Date of
Sr. SubStation/ No. Completion Capital Expenditure (Rs.
Type of Scheme Location Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh) Capital Expenditure (Rs. Lakh) Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh) Justification Present status Funding
No. Length for EHT Scheme cost (Actual/ Lakh)
Lines in Ckm B.P.No. Anticipated) FY 2016- FY 2017- FY 2018-
(Rs in Lakhs) FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
17 18 19

To connect all the private power plants which can


be used as an evacuation hub with connectivity to
400 kV Substations 03.03.14/ Back Charged on 15.04.16 at 230 kV level. 400
1 Thervaikandigai 2x315 + 1x200 57,619.00 7/10.02.12 500 - - 23,048 17,286 11,524 500 - - 23,048 17,286 11,524 major 400 kV substations for power evacuation, to REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) 31.03.17 kV line works are under progress.
meet out the rapidly increaing load demand of
Chennai city and for effective load management.
400 kV Substations 04.12.14/ Works are under progress. Line work
2 Thappagundu 3 x 200 9,311.00 2,000 - - 931 3,724 3,724 2,000 - - - 4,656 3,724 For evacuation of wind power in Madurai region PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) 31.03.17 completed.
59/3.12.12
400 kV Substations 04.12.14/ For evacuation of wind power in Coimbatore Works are under progress. Line work
3 Anikadavu 2 x 315 + 2 x 200 50,640.00 2,000 - - 5,064 20,256 20,256 2,000 - - - 25,320 20,256 PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) 31.03.17 region completed
400 kV Substations 15.11.15/ For evacuation of wind power in Coimbatore
4 Rasipalayam 2 x 315 + 2 x 200 63,046.00 59/03.12.12 3,000 - - 12,609 25,218 18,914 3,000 - - - 12,609 25,218 Works are under progress. PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) 31.03.17 region

400 kV Substations Dharmapuri 25.12.15/


2 x 315 + 2 x 200 98,185.83 19/13.01.14 Works are under progress. NABARD
Schemes (Non-JICA) (Palavady) 31.03.17
To cater the proposed SEZ loads in Krishnagiri
District , future load growth and to feed the new
5 400 kV Substations Rasipalayam - 8,000 - - - 14,280 9,520 8,000 - - - 14,280 9,520 Works are under progress. Issues involved in
Gurubarapalli and Uddanapalli 230 KV NABARD
Schemes (Non-JICA) Palavadi (195 Kms) Line work
substations
LILO portion completed. Linking with the
400 kV Substations LILO MTPS -
take off structure will be taken up after NABARD
Schemes (Non-JICA) Thiruvalam (35Kms)
completion of SS work.
400 kV Substations 11.06.15/ For evacuation of wind power in Tirunelveli Test charged on 09.01.17 with 2x500 MVA
6 Kanarpatty 2 x 500 + 4 x 200 24,760.00 107/06.07.13 1,000 - 7,428 14,856 2,476 1,000 - - 7,428 14,856 2,476 REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) 31.01.17 - region ICTs and 3x200
400 kV Substations
7 Kayathar - Kanarpatty - - - - - - - - - - - Line work nearing completion REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) -
400 kV Substations Tirunelveli -
8 - - - - - - - - - - - Line energised REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) Kanarpatty -
Test charged on 08.09.16 with 2x315 and
400 kV Substations
9 Kamuthi 2 x 315 + 3 x 200 51,870.00 132/ 25.08.15 31.08.16 21,600 - 50,000 1,870 - 21,600 - - 50,000 1,870 - For Solar power evacuation 1x200 MVA ICTs. Further, 1x200 MVA ICT PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA)
- commissioned on 30.12.16.
Thennampatty Substation works are under progress.
400 kV Substations 24.07.17/
10 (Pavoorchatram) - 2 x 315 + 2 x 200 41,888.00 190/ 08.10.14 - - - - - - - - - - - For evacuation of wind power Retender floated for 400 kV Line work with KfW
Schemes (Non-JICA) 31.03.18
KfW - due date of opening on 07.01.17.
Tender Lodged and retender to be floated for
400 kV Substations For evacuation of power from NCTPS Stage-II and
11 Pulianthope 3 x 315 55,800.00 83/ 06.11.13 2018-19 200 20,000 10,000 - - 5,580 200 5,000 25,000 - - - SS. For 400 kV Line work: Tender floated REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) to provide stability in North and Central EDCs.
with due date of opening on 28.01.17.
400 kV Substations Vellalavidudhi For Solar power evacuation and for system Tender to be floated for both substation and
12 2 x315 + 2x200 90,918.68 80/ 11.12.15 2018-19 200 5,000 45,000 - - 500 200 5,000 45,000 - - - KfW
Schemes (Non-JICA) (Pudukkottai) - KfW strengthening line work.
Revised administrative approval is under
400 kV Substations For System strengthening for disposal of power
13 Edayarpalayam 2x315 + 3x200 77,282.00 16/ 13.01.14 2018-19 - 5,000 35,000 - - 20,000 - 1,000 30,000 - - - process for conversion from GIS to AIS. PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) received from Chattisgarh
Tender to be floated for line work.
400 kV Substations Tharamani To export the power from North Chennai Tender to be floated for both substation and
14 2x500 + 2x200 70,788.00 215/ 15.12.16 2018-19 - 10,000 25,000 - - 17,500 - 5,000 25,000 - - - To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) (Upgradation) Generating Stations to Chennai South Region. line work.
400 kV Substations
15 Kolappalur Sanction awaited 2020-21 - 1,000 5,000 - - - - 500 5,000 - - - To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA)
All substation works are works are nearing
Sholinganallur
400 kV Substations 18.06.15/ To meet the bulk industrial loads coming up in completion. Issues involved in 400 kV Line
16 (Ottiyambakkam) 2x315 + 1x200 14,860.00 76/11.04.07 6,000 - - 12,000 2,000 6,000 - - - 12,000 2,000 JICA
Schemes (JICA) 31.03.17 Sholinganallur and Siruseri areas. route and is being followed up. 230 kV Line
(JICA)
- work completed.
To meet the rapidly increasing load demand of
Coimbatore region for effective load management,
400 kV Substations 19.11.15/ Test charged on 24.08.16 with 3x315 MVA
17 Karamadai (JICA) 3x315 41,576.56 05/03.03.12 15,000 - 6,500 28,000 - 15,000 - - 6,500 28,000 - to avoid overloading of exsisting 400/230 KV JICA
Schemes (JICA) 08/2016 ICTs.
ICTs at Myvadi and Arasur during nil Hydro and
- nil Wind generation.
For providing connectivity to the proposed
400 kV Substations 24.09.16/ Thervoikandigai 400 KV SS for evacuation Work under progress. Court case involved in
18 Manali (JICA) 2x315 + 2x200 59,986.00 55/25.10.12 23,000 15,000 - - 18,000 10,000 23,000 15,000 - - 18,000 10,000 JICA
Schemes (JICA) 31.03.17 purpose and for disposal of power locally, so that 400 kV Line work and is being followed up.
400 KV network can be formed in Chennai area.
400 kV Substations Tender to be floated for both substations and
19 Korattur (JICA) 2x315 + 2x200 51,131.00 55/25.10.12 2018-19 - 1,000 7,000 - - - - 1,000 7,000 - - - To strengthern the Chennai Network. JICA
Schemes (JICA) Lines
Capacity for Date of
Sr. SubStation/ Completion Capital Expenditure (Rs. Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh) Capital Expenditure (Rs. Lakh) Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh)
Type of Scheme Location Justification Present status Funding
No. Length for EHT Scheme cost (Actual/ Lakh)
Lines in Ckm B.P.No. Anticipated) FY 2016- FY 2017- FY 2018-
(Rs in Lakhs) FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
17 18 19
Tender opened and under process for
400 kV Substations
20 Guindy (JICA) 2x315 75,652.00 55/25.10.12 2018-19 - 6,500 20,000 - - - - 6,500 20,000 - - - To strengthern the Chennai Network. substation. LOA is under perusal for Line JICA
Schemes (JICA)
work.
To avoid overloading, to feed the proposed and
sanctioned 110 kV substations, to accommodate
230 kV Substations 14.09.13/ Test charged on 02.05.16 with 1x100 MVA
21 Singapuram 2X100 3,254.00 145/29.10.10 100 - - 1,870 534 - 100 - - 1,870 534 - future load growth in Salem area and to reduce REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) 30.06.16 Auto Transformer
over loading of 110 kV Salem - Deviakurichi
feeder - I &II.
To provide load relief to Palladam, Ingur and
230 kV Substations Ponnapuram 230 KV substations and to facilitate Substation work under progress. 230 kV Line
22 Kurukuthi 2x100 12,861.62 53/16.08.13 31.03.17 1,000 - - - 6,431 5,145 1,000 - - - 6,431 5,145 REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) operational flexibilities and alternate feeding work completed.
arrangement to the existing substations.
To meet the EHT demand of 32 MVA at
Jambunathapuram for the upcoming Steel Rolling
230 kV Substations Substation works are under progress. Line
23 Jambunathapuram 2x100 5,478.15 23/22.05.13 31.03.17 3,000 - - - 2,739 1,096 3,000 - - - 2,739 1,096 Mill and to provide load relief to Trichy, REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) work completed.
Perambalur, Samayapuram and Budansandhai
230 KV substations.
230 kV Substations To evacuate solar power from solar power Substation works are under progress. Line
24 Muthuramaligapuram 5x100 8,111.00 132/25.08.15 31.03.17 800 - - 4,056 1,622 2,433 800 - - 4,056 1,622 2,433 PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) promoters in Virudhunagar District. work completed.
In order to provide uninterrupted power supply
230 kV Substations to HT Industries and Multinational companies at Substation works are under progress. Line
25 Kancheepuram 2x100+ 1x16 4,389.70 22/15.06.11 31.03.17 2,000 - - - 1,756 1,753 2,000 - - - 1,756 1,753 REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) Kanchipuram and to evacuate power from work completed.
Kalpakkam Atomic power station.
In order to provide alternate supply to nearby
230 kV Substations Substation works are under progress. Line
26 Savasapuram 2x100 3,687.23 30/05.09.11 31.03.17 2,000 - - - 1,475 1,475 2,000 - - - 1,475 1,475 substations and to evacuate 450MW power from REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) work completed.
Ind Bharath (Karwar ) Plant.
To provide load relief to Pugalur and
Pudanchandai 230 KV Substaions. To meet the Substation works are under progress. 230 kV
future load growth in and around Namakkal area Deviakurichy - Pudhansanthai at Valayapatty
230 kV Substations
27 Valayapatty 2x100 8,869.18 12/13.01.14 31.03.17 1,000 - - - 2,661 2,661 1,000 - - - 2,661 2,661 and to provide operational flexibilities and - work completed. PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA)
alternate feeding arrangements to the existing 230 kV Paramathi - Alundur at Valayapatty
substaions, so as to maintain uninterrupted power Line work under progress.
supply.
To extend 110 kV supply to M/s. TNPL and also
230 kV Substations Mondipatti in TNPL Substation and Line works are under
28 2x100 13,012.84 35/ 23.03.15 31.03.17 3,000 - - 2,603 7,808 3,000 - - - 2,603 7,808 to give load relief to Trichy 230 kV SS and PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) Premises progress.
- Alagarkoil 230 kV SS.
To accommodate the future load growth and to
230 kV Substations 01.07.17 / Substation work under progress and Tender
29 Mambalam 2x100 12,270.00 36/06.03.14 3,000 8,000 - - 8,589 3,000 8,000 - - - 8,589 provide load relef to 33/11 KV Substations in TNIPP-I
Schemes (Non-JICA) 31.03.18 to be floated for cable work.
- Mambalam area.
In order to provide load relief to 110 KV
230 kV Substations 23.03.18/ Work under progress for substation. Tender
30 Porur 2x100 24,734.00 23/01.02.14 8,000 10,000 - - 17,314 8,000 10,000 - - - 17,314 Sriperumpudur - Porur feeder I and II and to REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) 31.03.18 to be floated for cable work.
- accommodate future load growth.
To meet the future load growth of Krishnagiri
230 kV Substations Tender opened on 20.12.16 and under
31 Udanapally 2X100 16,806.78 109/ 28.10.14 2018-19 200 8,000 - - 5,042 200 8,000 - - - 5,042 District due to formation of SEZ and Hokennakkal PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) process for substation and line.
- Combined water scheme.
In order to give load relief to Trichy, Thanjavur
230 kV Substations and Alundur 230 kV substations, to extend supply Site taken over. Estimate is under scrutiny.
32 Thuvakudi 2x100 11,700.30 50/21.05.15 2018-19 200 5,000 - - 3,510 200 5,000 - - - 3,510 TNIPP-II
Schemes (Non-JICA) to the intending HT consumers and to meet the Survey under progress for line works.
future load growth in and around Thuvakudy.
-
In order to give load relief to the existing 230 kV
substations at Alagerkoil and Pasumalai and to
230 kV Substations meet the future load growth in and around Tender is under finalisation for SS and Line
33 Samayanallur 2x100 8,388.93 59/ 23.07.15 2017-18 200 5,000 - 839 1,678 200 5,000 - - 839 1,678 REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) Madurai works.
area, establishment of a new 230/110 kV SS is
- very much essential.
230 kV Substations For System strengthening for evacuation of
34 Neyveli 3x160 10,110.23 65/ 25.07.15 2017-18 200 5,000 - - 2,022 200 5,000 - - - 2,022 Tender is under finalisation. PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) - powerfrom NNTPS.
To give load relief to Tiruvarur, Kadalangudi and
Kumbakkonam 230 KV Substations and to
230 kV Substations facilitate operation flexiblities and alternate Specification is under approval for floating
35 Narimanam 2x100 9,031.09 67/27.07.15 2018-19 200 5,000 - - 1,806 200 5,000 - - - 1,806 PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) feeding arrangements for the existing substations tender.
and to meet the future load growth in and around
- Narimanam area.
Capacity for Date of
Sr. SubStation/ Completion Capital Expenditure (Rs. Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh) Capital Expenditure (Rs. Lakh) Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh)
Type of Scheme Location Justification Present status Funding
No. Length for EHT Scheme cost (Actual/ Lakh)
Lines in Ckm B.P.No. Anticipated) FY 2016- FY 2017- FY 2018-
(Rs in Lakhs) FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
17 18 19
To avoid overloading to give load relief to 110 KV
Vilupuram - Deviakurichi feeder for operational
230 kV Substations Estimate is under scrutiny for specification
36 Sankarapuram 2x100 17,793.65 10/04.02.16 18-19 200 10,000 - - 3,559 200 10,000 - - - 3,559 flexibilities to strengthern the infrastructure REC
Schemes (Non-JICA) approval.
facilities for power evacuation and to have N-1
- Criteria as per CEA Norms.
To give load relief to Singarapet and
230 kV Substations Vinnamangalam 230 KV Substations and to meet Estimate is under scrutiny for specification
37 Tiruppathur 2x100 14,815.96 12/04.02.16 2018-19 200 10,000 - - 2,963 200 10,000 - - - 2,963 PFC
Schemes (Non-JICA) the future load growth in and around Tiruppathur approval.
- area.
In order to accommodate the future load growth
230 kV Substations in and around Thiruvanmiyur area and to give
38 Thiruvaanmiyur (UG) 2x100 9,255.04 137/ 16.08.16 2018-19 - 2,000 7,000 - - 1,851 - 1,000 7,000 - - 1,851 Estimate is under preparation To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) load relief to Thiruvanmiyur 33/11 kV SS and
near by substations.
230 kV Substations In order to give load relief to near by substations
39 Poolavady 2x100 10,731.70 49/ 06.09.16 2018-19 200 7,000 - - 1,200 - 200 7,000 - - 1,200 Estimate is under preparation To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) - and to meet the future load growth.
230 kV Substations Selvapuram In order to give load relief to near by substations
40 2x100 6,434.72 55/ 06.09.16 2019-20 - - - - - - 2,000 - - - Estimate is under preparation To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) (Puttuvikki) - and to meet the future load growth.
2,000
230 kV Substations Kalivelampatty,
41 Sanction awaited 2019-20 - - - - - - - - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) Negamam, Elumathur
-
230 kV Substations
42 Avadi Sanction awaited 2018-19 200 7,000 - - 1,200 - 200 5,000 - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) -
230 kV Substations
43 Koyambedu (UG) Sanction awaited 2018-19 200 7,000 - - 1,200 - 200 5,000 - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) -
230 kV Substations
44 Erode Sanction awaited 2018-19 200 7,000 - - 1,200 - 200 5,000 - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) -
230 kV Substations
45 Edapady Sanction awaited 2018-19 200 7,000 - - 1,200 - 200 5,000 - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) -
230 kV Substations
46 Karuppur Sanction awaited 2018-19 200 7,000 - - 1,200 - 200 5,000 - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) -
230 kV Substations Gangaikondan
47 Sanction awaited 2018-19 200 7,000 - - 1,200 - 200 5,000 - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) (Thalaiyuttu) -
230 kV Substations Kondhagai,Arasanur,
48 Sanction awaited 2019-20 - 1,500 - - - - - 500 - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) Periyar Power House -
Srivilliputhur/Virudu
nagar
230 kV Substations Vishwanathapuram IT
49 Sanction awaited 2019-20 - 1,000 - - - - - 500 - - - Sanction awaited To be tied up
Schemes (Non-JICA) Park,
Thenkanikottai/Bargu
r, SanthaMadurai -
In order to feed the proposed 110 KV new
substations and to meet the future load growth in
230 kV Substations 39/ SS Works are under progress. 230 kV line
50 Thiruppur (JICA) 2x100 7,554.28 31.03.17 500 2,000 - - 5,000 500 2,000 - - - 5,000 and around Tiruppur area and to reduce the JICA
Schemes (JICA) 25.10.11 works are under progress.
continuous overloading of 110 KV Palladam -
- Tiruppur feeder.
In order to avoid overloading of nearby 110 KV
230 kV Substations 21/ SS Works are under progress. 230 kV line
51 Shenbagapudur (JICA) 2x100 7,766.03 31.03.17 500 2,000 - - 5,000 500 2,000 - - - 5,000 Feeders and to accomodate future load growth in JICA
Schemes (JICA) 14.06.11 works are under progress.
- Gobi area.
To meet the future load growth in Ariyalur area,
to provide uninteruppted power supply to EHT
230 kV Substations 131/ All works are completed.Substation will be
52 Poiyur (JICA) 2x100 3,470.89 31.03.17 2,000 200 - 2,500 600 2,000 200 - - 2,500 600 consumers especially for the Railway Traction and JICA
Schemes (JICA) 05.10.10 commissioned on completion of line works.
to privide the alternate supply to the existing
- Substations.
230 kV Substations 54/ Substation work completed and will be
53 CMRL Central (JICA) 2x100 17,062.57 31.12.16 3,000 100 - 10,000 2,000 3,000 100 - - 5,000 7,000 For providing 110 kV supply to M/s.CMRL energised on completion of 230 kV Cable JICA
Schemes (JICA) 25.10.12 - work.
To provide load relief to existing Pasumalai 230
230 kV Substations 12/ All works are completed.Substation will be
54 Kinnimangalam (JICA) 3x100 4,755.15 30.09.16 2,000 200 1,500 3,000 - 2,000 200 - 1,500 3,000 - KV SS, to evacuate the wind generation in Theni JICA
Schemes (JICA) 14.03.12 district and to feed the proposed 110 KV new commissioned on completion of line works.
- substations.
230 kV Substations 06/ To meed the future load growth and to extened All works are completed.Substation will be
55 Kumbakonam (JICA) 2x100 5,790.72 2017-18 1,000 2,000 - 1,700 3,000 1,000 2,000 - - 1,700 3,000 JICA
Schemes (JICA) 04.02.13 - supply to proposed 110 KV new substations. commissioned on completion of line works.
To improve the voltage profile of Purisai and
230 kV Substations 07/ Test charged on 08.08.16 with 2x100 MVA
56 Echur (Purisai) (JICA) 2x100 4,552.78 31.08.16 2,000 - 1,400 3,000 - 2,000 - - 1,400 3,000 - surrounding areas . There will be a saving of 3 JICA
Schemes (JICA) 04.02.13 Auto Transformer.
- MW on establishment of the SS.
Capacity for Date of
Sr. SubStation/ Completion Capital Expenditure (Rs. Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh) Capital Expenditure (Rs. Lakh) Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh)
Type of Scheme Location Justification Present status Funding
No. Length for EHT Scheme cost (Actual/ Lakh)
Lines in Ckm B.P.No. Anticipated) FY 2016- FY 2017- FY 2018-
(Rs in Lakhs) FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
17 18 19
To meet the future load growth, development in
Control room, Plinth and cable laying works
230 kV Substations Ambattur 3rd main 2X100+2X25,110/3 53/ Ambattur and surrounding area and to ensure
57 8,389.79 31.03.17 2,000 - - 5,000 2,000 2,000 - - - 5,000 2,000 are nearing completion.1x100 MVA Auto JICA
Schemes (JICA) road (JICA) 3+2X16, 110/11 25.10.12 reliability of supply to the essential upcoming
Transformer erected.
- infrastructure loads of Chennai city
To provide load relief to Tharamani 230 KV SS, to Case cleared and work commenced.
230 kV Substations 60/ provide alternate supply and to accommodate the Transformer plinth work completed.GIS
58 R.A.Puram (JICA) 2x100 16,007.30 31.03.17 3,000 - - 9,300 2,000 3,000 - - - 9,000 2,300 JICA
Schemes (JICA) 05.04.13 enhancement of transformer capacity fed off by building roof slab shuttering work and
- the substation. reinforcement work under progress.
230 kV Substations 68/ To augment the power needs of Chennai city and
59 TNEB HQtrs (JICA) 2x100 7,139.00 2018-19 - 1,000 3,000 - - - - 1,000 3,000 - - - Tender lodged and retender to be floated JICA
Schemes (JICA) 11.04.07 to strengthern the 230 KV and 110 KV network
110 kV Substations Thirumangalam
60 2x25+ 2x16 2,832.39 20/30.04.12 31.03.17 100 - - 1,983 283 100 - - - 1,983 283 Works are under progress. TNIPP
Schemes (Metro Zone) -
110 kV Substations
61 Amaravathipudur 1x16 1,190.28 4/09.01.14 31.05.16 150 - 476 357 - 150 - - 476 357 - Test Charged on 15.04.16 PFC
Schemes -
110 kV Substations
62 Poosalakudi 1x10 847.16 3/09.01.14 31.03.17 200 - - 593 85 200 - - - 593 85 Works are under progress. PFC
Schemes -
110 kV Substations
63 M. G. Pudur 2x16 1,746.94 20/13.01.14 31.03.17 300 - - 1,223 175 300 - - - 1,223 175 Works are under progress. REC
Schemes -
110 kV Substations
64 Nadaikavu 1x10 518.36 235/13.12.07 31.12.16 300 - 52 259 104 300 - - 52 259 104 Test charged on 30.12.16 PFC
Schemes -
Substation works are under progress. For 110
110 kV Substations kV Line, work will be taken up according to
65 Race Course 2x10 1,610.19 20/08.02.10 31.03.17 500 - 161 644 322 500 - - 161 644 322 PFC
Schemes the revised BP due to long pending railway
- crossing approval.
To improve the voltage regulation, reduce the line
loss, provide load relief to the existing
110 KV Substations -
110 kV Substations Various substations, to meet the future load growth in and
66 40 nos. (List enclosed 16-17 40,000 - - 12,000 16,000 4,000 34,549 - - 12,000 16,000 4,000 Works are under progress REC/PFC
Schemes approvals around the area , to provide 33 KV source to new
as Annexure 2)
33KV Substations and to extened EHT/HT
Supply.
To improve the voltage regulation, reduce the line
loss, provide load relief to the existing
110 KV Substations -
110 kV Substations Various substations, to meet the future load growth in and
67 40 nos. (List enclosed 17-18 - 32,700 - 3,270 13,080 6,540 - 38,679 - - 3,270 13,080 Works are under progress REC/PFC
Schemes approvals around the area , to provide 33 KV source to new
as Annexure 2)
33KV Substations and to extened EHT/HT
Supply.
To improve the voltage regulation, reduce the line
loss, provide load relief to the existing
110 KV Substations -
110 kV Substations Various substations, to meet the future load growth in and
68 40 nos.(List enclosed 18-19 - - 31,000 - 3,100 12,400 - - 36,331 - - 3,100 Work to be taken up REC/PFC
Schemes approvals around the area , to provide 33 KV source to new
as Annexure 2)
33KV Substations and to extened EHT/HT
Supply.
For transferring power either way which have Tender opened and under process for
69 765 kV Substation Ariyalur 2 x 1500 212,145.00 91/07.11.13 2018-19 10,000 35,000 68,000 - 21,215 42,429 10,000 35,000 68,000 - - 21,215 been pooled at North Chennai Pooling station and Substation. 765 kV Line work is under REC
Udangudi Pooling station to the Load centers. progress
Evacuating the power from various thermal
North Chennai Pooling
70 765 kV Substation 3 x 1500 250,981.00 64/25.07.15 2019-20 - 2,000 30,000 - - - - 2,000 30,000 - - - power projects in north chennai area and meet the Tender floated with due date on 20.01.17 PFC
Station - GIS SS
future load growth of chennai region.
Coimbatore 765 KV To export the power from North Chennai Pooling
71 765 kV Substation 2 x 1500 245,598.00 74/03.11.16 2019-20 - 500 5,000 - - - - 500 5,000 - - - Land acquisation is under process To be tied up
Substations station to Coimbatore region
72 765 kV Substation Virudhunagar Sanction awaited - - - - - - - - - - - - Sanction awaited. To be tied up
400 KV DC line from
Kalivanthapattu to Part of the backbone Network and associated line
73 400 kV Link Lines 52.00 41,550.00 76/11.04.07 31.03.17 500 - 8,310 20,775 8,310 500 - - - 29,085 8,310 Works are under progress. REC
Sholinganallur of Sholinganallur 400 kV SS.
(Ottiyambakkam) -
LILO of one circuit of
Thappagundu-
Anaikadavu 400 KV
400 kV Power 209/26.12.13 &
74 DC line at Udumalpet 30 4,051.80 2017-18 200 3,000 - 2,431 1,216 200 3,000 - - 2,431 1,216 For wind power evacuation. Tender under process REC
Evacuation Lines 49 / 27.03.14
400/230 KV PGCIL SS
with 2 Nos. bay
extension -
Capacity for Date of
Sr. SubStation/ Completion Capital Expenditure (Rs. Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh) Capital Expenditure (Rs. Lakh) Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh)
Type of Scheme Location Justification Present status Funding
No. Length for EHT Scheme cost (Actual/ Lakh)
Lines in Ckm B.P.No. Anticipated) FY 2016- FY 2017- FY 2018-
(Rs in Lakhs) FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
17 18 19
(i) Erection of 400 KV
DC transmission Line
with Quad Moose
400 kV Power For evacuation of power from UDANGUDI Tender to be floated. Work will be taken up
75 conductor from 170 30,141.00 - 1,000 5,000 - - - REC
Evacuation Lines Pooling Station according to the Commissioning of Project.
Udangudi Pooling 42/18.05.15 2020-21 - 5,000 10,000
Station to Kayathar
400 KV SS - - -
(ii) 400 KV Bay
400 kV Power
76 extension at Kayathar 1,741.46 - - - - - - To be tied up
Evacuation Lines
400 KV SS - 2nos. - - -
Erection of 230 KV
S/C line on DC towers
Works are under progress by
77 230 kV Link Lines from Karaikudi 400 140.00 4,228.00 77/11.04.07 2016-17 - 2,665 835 - 400 - - - 2,665 835 Link line of Karaikudi PGCIL 400 kV SS REC
SE/GCC/Madurai.
KV SS to Sembatty 230
KV SS
-
Erection of 230 KV
S/C line on DC towers
with Zebra conductor
1,200
between Palladam and
78 230 kV Link Lines 62.00 3,463.33 73/02.11.11 2016-17 - 346 1,732 515 400 - - - 346 1,732 Link line of Palladam 230 kV SS Works are under progress REC
Ingur instead of LILO
of 230 KV Myvadi-
Pugalur line at
Palladam 230 KV SS
-
(i) Link lines from Shoolagiri 400 kV SS to Hosur
Additional link lines to
187/ 07.10.14 & 230 kV SS
79 230 kV Link Lines Shoolagiri 400 kV SS 189.30 9,501.48 2017-18 - - 950 6,651 400 - - - 950 6,651 Tender under process REC
60/ 10.04.14 (ii) Removing constraints for power evacuation
and for KGTPS
- from KGTPS.
Erection of 230 KV DC
line on DC towers
with Zebra conductor
including OPGW cable
from the proposed
230/110 KV
230 kV Power Muthuramalingapura
80 130 6,459.05 185/30.10.13 31.03.17 - 5,167 1,292 - 500 - - 5,167 1,292 - For solar power evacuation Works are under progress. PFC
Evacuation Lines m 230/110-33 kV SS
near
Muthuramalingapura
m to the existing
Kavanoor 230 kV SS 1,000
via proposed Kamuthi
400 KV SS
-
Erection of 230 kV DC
line on DC tower with
Zebra conductor from
230 kV Power Kavanoor 230 KV SS
81 170.0 9,616.96 185/30.10.13 28.02.17 - 7,694 1,923 - 500 - - 7,694 1,923 - For solar power evacuation Works are under progress PFC
Evacuation Lines to Karaikudi 230 kV SS
with 6 nos. 230 kV bay
extension at Kavanoor
and Karaikudi
-
Erection of 230 KV DC
Line on DC tower with
Zebra conductor for
making LILO of the
230 kV Power Stringing only will be carried out at the time
82 existing 230 KV 2.00 96.54 16/20.02.16 2016-17 90 - 77 19 - - 90 - - 97 - 23kV Link Lines of Anaikadavu Substations REC
Evacuation Lines of commissioning.
Myvady -
Othakkalmandapam
feeder-I at Anaikadavu
400/230-110 KV SS
-
Capacity for Date of
Sr. SubStation/ Completion Capital Expenditure (Rs. Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh) Capital Expenditure (Rs. Lakh) Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh)
Type of Scheme Location Justification Present status Funding
No. Length for EHT Scheme cost (Actual/ Lakh)
Lines in Ckm B.P.No. Anticipated) FY 2016- FY 2017- FY 2018-
(Rs in Lakhs) FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
17 18 19
Erection of 230 KV DC
Line on DC tower with
Zebra conductor for
making LILO of the
230 kV Power
83 existing 230 KV 40.00 1,930.80 16/20.02.16 2017-18 1,500 - 1,545 386 - 1,500 - - 1,545 23kV Link Lines of Rasipalayam Substations Tender under process REC
Evacuation Lines
Myvady - Kurukathi -
Pugalur feeder at
Rasipalayam 400/230-
110 KV SS -
4,000 5,000
Erection of 230 KV DC
Line on DC tower with
Zebra conductor for
230 kV Power making LILO of the
84 50.00 2,413.50 16/20.02.16 2017-18 2,000 - 1,931 483 - 1,000 - - 1,931 23kV Link Lines of Rasipalayam Substations Tender under process REC
Evacuation Lines existing 230 KV Ingur -
Kurukathi - Palladam
feeder at Rasipalayam
400/230-110 KV SS
-
Replacement of aged
Kundah conductor in
the existing 230 KV
230 kV Improvement Neyveli - Eachangadu To strengthern the existing aged conductor with
85 39.90 1,779.40 255/26.6.10 - - 1,068 712 1,000 - - - 1,068 712 Works are under progress REC
Lines feeder SC line on SC higher capacity conductor to carry more power
tower by 230 KV SC
line on DC tower with 2016-17 2,000
Zebra conductor
-
Laying of 230 KV DC
feeder cable with To conversion of Mylapore substation as Grid
230 kV Improvement
86 1x1200 Sqmm XLPE 25.00 4,639.45 203/30.04.05 - 464 3,248 - 1,000 - - 3,712 - substation and strengthening 230 KV Network in Cable laying in 26/26 sections completed. REC
Lines
cable from Mylapore - Chennai Metro Area.
Taramani. -
230 kV Improvement 230 KV and 110 KV Various
87 16-17 20,000 - 16,000 4,000 - 20,000 - - 16,000 4,000 - REC
Lines Improvement lines approvals -
230 kV Improvement 230 KV and 110 KV Various
88 17-18 - 10,000 - 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 - - 8,000 2,000 To be tied up
Lines Improvement lines approvals -
230 kV Improvement 230 KV and 110 KV Various
89 18-19 - - 15,000 - - 10,500 - - 15,000 - - 10,500 To be tied up
Lines Improvement lines approvals
400KV SS at
90 400 kV KfW Schemes Thennampatti 41888 2,000 10,000 4,000 3,000 15,000 2,000 10,000 4,000 - 3,000 15,000 Works are under progress. KfW
(Pavoorchatram)

Manufacturing,
supply, erection
Testing and
commissioning of 400
kV DC line with Quad
Moose ACSR with MC
line from Kayathar 400
kV SS to common The corrected specification for fresh tender
point (17 kms) and DC has been sent to KfW on 22.8.16. NOC issued
line with Quad Moose by KfW on 30.8.16 and 16.12.2016. The Board
91 400 kV KfW Schemes ACSR from common - 1,000 6,000 - - 20,000 - 1,000 6,000 - - 20,000 approved for specification with BQR and for KfW
point to issuing NIT on 26.10.16. NIT issued on
proposedThennampatt 06.11.16 and 18.12.2016 with extended due
i 400 kV SS (7 kms) date of tender opening on 07.01.2017.
for a total length of 24
km falling in wind
zone -2. ii) Providing 4
Nos Bay extension at
Kayathar 400 kV SS for
Thennampatti Feeder
and future bay.
Capacity for Date of
Sr. SubStation/ Completion Capital Expenditure (Rs. Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh) Capital Expenditure (Rs. Lakh) Capitalisation (Rs. Lakh)
Type of Scheme Location Justification Present status Funding
No. Length for EHT Scheme cost (Actual/ Lakh)
Lines in Ckm B.P.No. Anticipated) FY 2016- FY 2017- FY 2018-
(Rs in Lakhs) FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19
17 18 19
400 KV DC Line
connecting
92 400 kV KfW Schemes Rasipalayam & 36,000 14,400 - - 20,000 30,000 36,000 14,400 - - 20,000 30,000 Works are under progress. KfW
Singarapet and 2 Nos
400 KV bays
230 kV transmission
lines connecting
various sub-stations in
93 230 kV KfW Schemes 20,000 10,000 - - 10,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 - - 10,000 20,000 Works are under progress. KfW
Tirunelveli, Madurai,
Coimbatore region &
13 Nos 230 kV bays
Augmentation of
transformation
94 400 kV KfW Schemes 2,000 9,600 - 2,000 9,600 2,000 9,600 - - 2,000 9,600 Works are under progress. KfW
capacity at 6 sub-
stations
Additional/Enhancem Various
95 Others 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 To be tied up
ent of Transformers approvals
96 Others TRANSCO Building 1,000 500 - - 1,600 400 - 1,000 500 - 1,600 400 To be tied up
97 Others Capacitor Bank 2,000 - - 1,600 400 - 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 1,000 - To be tied up
Budget for JICA
98 Others 60,000 30,000 30,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - - - - To be tied up
Schemes
282,340 292,600 394,500 238,288 299,721 382,916 270,799 272,169 394,331 148,351 326,234 364,315 -
ANNEXURE 2
LIST OF SUBSTATIONS FOR 2016-17
Voltage/ Capacity Scheme
Type of Date of
Sl.No Name of the Substation Ratio in BP.No/Date cost Rs. In
SS Total commissioning
K.V Nos. Lakhs
MVA
110 KV SUBSTATIONS

1 Thervoikandigai 110/33 New 1x25 25 15.04.16 44/12.05.14 2231.71

110/11 New 1x16 16 30.09.16

2 Perundurai SIPCOT III 110/11 New 1x16 16 18.04.16 36/23.03.15 646.55

3 Kadaiyur 110/11 New 1x16 16 21.04.16 13/07.01.15 649.47

4 Pochampally SIPCOT 110/33 New 1x25 25 06.04.16 16/08.01.15 1079.46

5 Paravakkal 110/33 Intro 1x16 16 25.05.16 42/13.03.15 215.27

6 Ettikuttaimedu 110/22 New 1x16 16 26.05.16 90/04.10.14 861.43

7 Periyandipalayam 110/33 Intro 1x16 16 04.07.16 129/24.08.15 224.08

8 Ammachathram 110/11 New 1x10 10 25.07.16 92/04.10.14 2619.77

110/22 New 1x10 10 02.11.16

9 Itchipudur 110/33 New 1x16 16 30.07.16 93/ 04.10.14 1274.57

10 Somayampalayam 110/11 New 1x10 10 01.08.16 9/20.02.12 1192.26

110/22 1x25 25 17.03.17

11 Chinnaovalapuram 110/22 New 1x10 10 19.08.16 6/06.01.15 1430.53

12 Pudukurichy 110/22 New 1x10 10 18.08.16 11/07.01.15 708.35

13 Penneswaramadam 110/33 New 1x16 16 26.10.16 82/04.09.14 1442.32

14 Gandarvakottai 110/33 UG 1x16 16 27.10.16 115/18.07.14 1598.88

15 Karanthaneri 110/33 Intro 1x16 16 09.11.16 114/15.07.15 204.74

Malayadipalayam at
16 110/11 New 1x16 16 19.11.16 3/06.01.15 1311.04
S.Ayyampalayam

17 Kuniyamuthur 110/22 New 1x16 16 29.11.16 36/26.04.14 639.48

18 Mettala at 110/22 New 1x16 16 28.12.16 58/23.07.15 838.29


Karkoodalpatty
19 A.Mettur 110/22 New 1x16 16 28.12.16 12/07.01.15 708.35

20 Keezhkavarapattu 110/22 New 1x16 16 30.01.17 62/25.07.15 715.58

21 Vadipatty 110/33 Intro 1x16 16 01.02.17 181/16.12.15 375.4

22 Selampalayam 110/22 New 1x16 16 08.02.17 60/21.07.14 1216.5

23 Thingalur 110/33 UG 1x16 16 27.02.17 127/14.08.15 649.03

24 Gomangalampudur 110/22 New 1x16 16 06.03.17 13/07.01.15 649.47

25 Kilpennathur 110/33 UG 1x16 16 10.03.17 196/20.10.14 1637.75

26 Koratty 110/33 UG 1x16 16 18.03.17 03/05.01.15 2107.87

27 Neelagudy 110/33 New 1x16 16 22.03.17 44/19.05.15 852.79

28 Chintamanipatty 110/33 UG 1x16 16 25.03.17 56/16.04.15 1495.35

29 Solasiramani 110/22 New 1x10 10 27.03.17 40/18.05.15 568.55

30 Pallakkapalayam 110/22 New 1x16 16 27.03.17 61/24.07.15 674.69

31 Ervadi 110/33 New 1x16 16 27.03.17 67/22.07.14 545.87

32 Poomalur 110/11 UG 1x16 16 27.03.17 16/23.01.15 1243.59

33 Pungampally 110/11 New 1x16 16 27.03.17 5/06.01.15 670.39

34 Sivakasi ESI 110/33 New 1x16 16 30.03.17 63/25.07.15 1267.464

Back charged at 22 KV Level. Court


35 Belur 110/22 New
case in 110 KV Line work.

36 Thalakarai (1x16) 110/22 New Work under Progress

37 Pillaipakkam SIPCOT (1x16


110/33-11
+ 1x16) New Work under Progress

38 Chinmaya Nagar (1x25 +110/33-11


1x16) New Work under Progress

39 Mallan Kinaru (1X16) 110/33/11 UG Work under Progress

40 Kasipalayam (1x16) 110/22 New Work under Progress


Tentative List of Substations for 2017-18

Voltage Rating Adm. Cost of Scheme


Sl. No. Name of the Substation. Type of SS Pr. Tr. Capacity Date Remarks
in KV Approval No. (Rs.in Lakhs)

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11

110 kV Substations

1 Thiru Nagar at Tirupur Town 110/11 New 3x16 82 11.12.15 2066.06 Work under progress

Work under progress. Line work to be


2 Valavanthankottai 110/11 New 2x10 66 27.07.15 1273.83
awarded

3 Sogathur 110/33-11 New 1x16+ 2x16 81 04.09.14 1616.47 Work under progress

4 Kamandoddy 110/11 New 2x16 80 04.09.14 802.8 Work awarded and is being commenced

5 Thogarapally 110/33 New 2x25 17 08.01.15 2039.01 Work awarded and is being commenced

Work under progress. Line work to be


6 Natrampally 110/33 New 2x16 81 11.12.15 2186.24
awarded

7 UPCL (Udangudi) 110/33/11 New 2x16+1x8 84 11.12.15 1875.57 Work under progress

Work under progress. Line work to be


8 Royakottai 110/33 Intro 2x16 56 23.07.15 3675.19
awarded

9 Dharmapuri 110/11 Intro 1x16 24 04.02.16 227.14 Work awarded and to be commenced

10 Thirumudivakkam Intro 110/33 Intro 2x25 64 14.03.17 654.02 Estimate under preparation

11 Padikasuvaithanpatty - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 67 18.03.17 216.6 Estimate under preparation

12 Kanyakumari - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 68 18.03.17 222.997 Estimate under preparation

13 Kallakudi - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x10 69 18.03.17 212.921 Estimate under preparation

14 Uranipuram - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 70 18.03.17 212.09 Estimate under preparation

15 Kalingapatty - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 71 18.03.17 217.865 Estimate under preparation

16 Chetpet - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 75 23.03.17 476.58 Estimate under preparation

17 Vinnamangalam Intro 110/33 1x16 134 16.08.16 232.74 Tender to be floated

18 Punalkulam intro 110/33 1x16 1 05.01.17 231.96 Tender to be floated

19 Uthukuli Intro 110/33 1x16 18 18.01.17 225.58 Tender to be floated

20 Mampatty 110/33 New 2x16 13 04.02.16 783.29 Work awarded and to be commenced

21 Singadivakkam (Sojitz Motherson) 110/33-11 2x16+2x16 58 06.09.16 1154.07 Tender to be floated

22 Ariyalam 110/33 New 2x25 57 23.07.15 1096.32 Tender under process

23 Samathur 110/22 New 2x16 71 09.10.15 849.88 work under progress

24 Andimadam 110/33/11 UG 2x16 22 02.02.16 835.98 Work awarded and to be commenced

25 Sathamangalam 110/33 Intro 1x16 126 11.08.15 244.59 Work awarded and to be commenced

SSE awarded. Tender under finalisation


26 Kolathur 110/33/11 UG 2x16 32 26.02.16 1486.51
for civil works.

Control room work awarded and to be


27 Denkanikottai 110/33 UG 2X16 148 29.09.15 1432.09 commenced. Tender is under finalisation
for SSE works.

Musiri at Puthur keelmugam DCW amount to be paid by the company.


28 110/22 New 1x10 11 04.02.16 820.26
(Under DCW) Tender under process .

29 Checkanurani Intro 110/33 1x16 60 30.05.16 242.62 Tender under process

30 Watrap Intro 110/33 1X16 68 31.05.16 258.74 Tender under process

31 Elumalai Intro 110/33 2x16 75 02.06.16 393.03 Tender under process


Voltage Rating Adm. Cost of Scheme
Sl. No. Name of the Substation. Type of SS Pr. Tr. Capacity Date Remarks
in KV Approval No. (Rs.in Lakhs)

Plinth work under progress. Tender to be


32 Sivagiri Intro 110/33 2x16 83 02.06.16 500.55
floated for balance work

33 Arasady 110/22 1x10 60 07.09.16 673.91 Tender to be floated

34 Collectorate /Tirupur 110/11 2x16 22 07.06.16 1014.85 Work to be awarded

35 Uppur. 110/33/11 1x16+2x8 38 02.09.16 1527.14 Tender to be floated

36 Lakshmanampatty 110/33- 22 1x16+2x10 21 07.06.16 825.56 work under progress

37 Beach road 110/22 2x10 24 07.06.16 1928.49 Civil work commenced

38 Devanampalayam 110/22 2x16 51 06.09.16 1136.94 Estimate under Sanction

39 Athani 110/22 2x16 72 02.11.16 817.31 Estimate under scrutiny

40 K.G.Chavady 110/22 2x16 53 06.09.16 1991.58 Tender opened and under process
Tentative List of Substations for 2018-19

Cost of
Voltage Adm.
Sl. Type of Pr. Tr. Scheme
Name of the Substation. Rating Approv Date Remarks
No. SS Capacity (Rs.in
in KV al No.
Lakhs)

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 12

110 kV Substations

Work under progress by GCC.


1 Pallikaranai (Indoor) 110/33-11 New 2x16+ 2x16 55 23.07.15 1813.23 Control room work to be done
by CDC/GEDCO

Work under progress by GCC.


2 Mangadu (Indoor) 110/11 New 2x16 78 11.12.15 1835.55 Control room work to be done
by CDC/GEDCO

Sriram Properties and


3 110/33-11 New 2x16+ 2x16 26 30.12.10 5834.82 Work under progress.
Infrastructure

4 Pappanaickenpalayam 110/11 New 2x16 11 03.03.11 963.74 Land will be handed over shortly

Work awarded and land is under


5 Thisayanvilai Town 110/33 New 2x16 79 11.12.15 1129.73
dispute

Revised administrative approval


Pulianthope (From
6 110/33/11 UG 2X50 167 23.11.15 4010.94 is to be obtained. Tender to be
33 KV)
floated.

Alamarathur 110/11 KV SS at
7 110/11 2x16 23 07.06.16 1313.49 Estimate under scrutiny
Somawarapatty

8 Indira Nagar 110/22 2x16 25 09.06.16 784.5 Estimate Sanctioned

Gangapuram 110 /22 kV SS at


9 110/22 2x16 52 06.09.16 778.01 Estimate under scrutiny
Thayirpalayam

10 Marakkanam UG. 110/33/11 2x16 196 10.11.16 2087.17 Tender to be floated

11 Thenoor UG 110/33/11 2x16 205 19.11.16 1669.85 Tender to be floated

12 Poonimangadu Intro 110/33 1x16 154 07.09.16 222.79 Tender to be floated

13 Odugathur (UG) 110/33/11 2x16 47 26.05.16 1419.16 Tender to be floated

14 Naduvalur (UG) 110/33/11 2x16 65 31.05.16 1991.85 Tender to be floated

15 Thaneerpandal 110/33-11 2x16+2x16 54 06.09.16 1262.2 Tender to be floated

16 Vellakarai 110/22 2x16 56 06.09.16 1364.71 Tender to be floated

Nallamanaickenpatty (Sattur
17 110/33/11 1x16+1x8 61 07.09.16 1237.74 Tender to be floated
Taluk)

18 Poondi Intro 110/33 1x16 165 22.09.16 259 Tender to be floated

19 Uppupalayam 110/22 2x16 71 02.11.16 896.13 Tender to be floated

Ganapathypalayam at
20 110/22 2x10 82 08.12.16 1337.89 Tender to be floated
Punjailalamangalam

21 Morappur. 110/33-11 2x16+1x16 83 09.12.16 1223.13 Tender to be floated

22 Noyyal 110/33-11 2x10 18 04.04.17 840.91 Tender to be floated

23 Karapattu 110/33 2x16 17 04.04.17 722.77 Tender to be floated

24 Erudayampattu 110/22 2x10 25 06.04.17 1332 Tender to be floated

25 Adhavathur 110/11 Proposal is under circulation

26 Mahindra Industrial Park 110/11 Proposal is under circulation


Tentative List of Substations for 2017-18
Cost of
Voltage Adm.
Sl. Name of the Type Pr. Tr. Scheme
Rating Approval Date Funding Remarks
No. Substation. of SS Capacity (Rs.in
in KV No.
Lakhs)
1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12
110 kV Substations

Thiru Nagar at Tirupur


1 110/11 New 3x16 82 11.12.15 2066.06 TNIPP-II Work under progress
Town

Work under progress. Line


2 Valavanthankottai 110/11 New 2x10 66 27.07.15 1273.83 PFC
work to be awarded

3 Sogathur 110/33-11 New 1x16+ 2x16 81 04.09.14 1616.47 PFC Work under progress

Work awarded and is


4 Kamandoddy 110/11 New 2x16 80 04.09.14 802.8 PFC
being commenced
Work awarded and is
5 Thogarapally 110/33 New 2x25 17 08.01.15 2039.01 PFC
being commenced
Work under progress. Line
6 Natrampally 110/33 New 2x16 81 11.12.15 2186.24 PFC
work to be awarded

7 UPCL (Udangudi) 110/33/11 New 2x16+1x8 84 11.12.15 1875.57 REC Work under progress

Work under progress. Line


8 Royakottai 110/33 Intro 2x16 56 23.07.15 3675.19 PFC
work to be awarded

Work awarded and to be


9 Dharmapuri 110/11 Intro 1x16 24 04.02.16 227.14 PFC
commenced
To be tied Estimate under
10 Thirumudivakkam Intro 110/33 Intro 2x25 64 14.03.17 654.02
up preparation
Padikasuvaithanpatty - To be tied Estimate under
11 110/33 Intro 1x16 67 18.03.17 216.6
Intro up preparation
To be tied Estimate under
12 Kanyakumari - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 68 18.03.17 222.997
up preparation
To be tied Estimate under
13 Kallakudi - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x10 69 18.03.17 212.921
up preparation

To be tied Estimate under


14 Uranipuram - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 70 18.03.17 212.09
up preparation

To be tied Estimate under


15 Kalingapatty - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 71 18.03.17 217.865
up preparation

To be tied Estimate under


16 Chetpet - Intro 110/33 Intro 1x16 75 23.03.17 476.58
up preparation

To be tied
17 Vinnamangalam Intro 110/33 1x16 134 16.08.16 232.74 Tender to be floated
up

To be tied
18 Punalkulam intro 110/33 1x16 1 05.01.17 231.96 Tender to be floated
up

To be tied
19 Uthukuli Intro 110/33 1x16 18 18.01.17 225.58 Tender to be floated
up

Work awarded and to be


20 Mampatty 110/33 New 2x16 13 04.02.16 783.29 PFC
commenced
Singadivakkam (Sojitz To be tied
21 110/33-11 2x16+2x16 58 06.09.16 1154.07 Tender to be floated
Motherson) up

22 Ariyalam 110/33 New 2x25 57 23.07.15 1096.32 REC Tender under process

23 Samathur 110/22 New 2x16 71 09.10.15 849.88 PFC work under progress
Work awarded and to be
24 Andimadam 110/33/11 UG 2x16 22 02.02.16 835.98 PFC
commenced
Work awarded and to be
25 Sathamangalam 110/33 Intro 1x16 126 11.08.15 244.59 PFC
commenced
SSE awarded. Tender
26 Kolathur 110/33/11 UG 2x16 32 26.02.16 1486.51 PFC under finalisation for civil
works.
Control room work
awarded and to be
27 Denkanikottai 110/33 UG 2X16 148 29.09.15 1432.09 TNIPP-II commenced. Tender is
under finalisation for SSE
works.
Musiri at Puthur DCW amount to be paid
To be tied
28 keelmugam 110/22 New 1x10 11 04.02.16 820.26 by the company. Tender
up
(Under DCW) under process .

To be tied
29 Checkanurani Intro 110/33 1x16 60 30.05.16 242.62 Tender under process
up

To be tied
30 Watrap Intro 110/33 1X16 68 31.05.16 258.74 Tender under process
up

To be tied
31 Elumalai Intro 110/33 2x16 75 02.06.16 393.03 Tender under process
up

Plinth work under


To be tied
32 Sivagiri Intro 110/33 2x16 83 02.06.16 500.55 progress. Tender to be
up
floated for balance work

To be tied
33 Arasady 110/22 1x10 60 07.09.16 673.91 Tender to be floated
up

To be tied
34 Collectorate /Tirupur 110/11 2x16 22 07.06.16 1014.85 Work to be awarded
up

To be tied
35 Uppur. 110/33/11 1x16+2x8 38 02.09.16 1527.14 Tender to be floated
up

To be tied
36 Lakshmanampatty 110/33- 22 1x16+2x10 21 07.06.16 825.56 work under progress
up

To be tied
37 Beach road 110/22 2x10 24 07.06.16 1928.49 Civil work commenced
up

To be tied
38 Devanampalayam 110/22 2x16 51 06.09.16 1136.94 Estimate under Sanction
up

To be tied
39 Athani 110/22 2x16 72 02.11.16 817.31 Estimate under scrutiny
up

To be tied Tender opened and under


40 K.G.Chavady 110/22 2x16 53 06.09.16 1991.58
up process
Tentative List of Substations for 2018-19

Adm.
Sl. Voltage Rating Cost of Scheme
Name of the Substation. Type of SS Pr. Tr. Capacity Approval Date Funding Remarks
No. in KV (Rs.in Lakhs)
No.

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12

110 kV Substations

Work under progress by GCC.


1 Pallikaranai (Indoor) 110/33-11 New 2x16+ 2x16 55 23.07.15 1813.23 TNIPP-II Control room work to be done by
CDC/GEDCO

Work under progress by GCC.


2 Mangadu (Indoor) 110/11 New 2x16 78 11.12.15 1835.55 TNIPP-II Control room work to be done by
CDC/GEDCO

Sriram Properties and


3 110/33-11 New 2x16+ 2x16 26 30.12.10 5834.82 PFC Work under progress.
Infrastructure

4 Pappanaickenpalayam 110/11 New 2x16 11 03.03.11 963.74 PFC Land will be handed over shortly

Work awarded and land is under


5 Thisayanvilai Town 110/33 New 2x16 79 11.12.15 1129.73 REC
dispute

Revised administrative approval is


Pulianthope (From 33
6 110/33/11 UG 2X50 167 23.11.15 4010.94 TNIPP-II to be obtained. Tender to be
KV)
floated.

Alamarathur 110/11 KV SS at
7 110/11 2x16 23 07.06.16 1313.49 Estimate under scrutiny
Somawarapatty

8 Indira Nagar 110/22 2x16 25 09.06.16 784.5 Estimate Sanctioned

Gangapuram 110 /22 kV SS at


9 110/22 2x16 52 06.09.16 778.01 Estimate under scrutiny
Thayirpalayam

10 Marakkanam UG. 110/33/11 2x16 196 10.11.16 2087.17 Tender to be floated

11 Thenoor UG 110/33/11 2x16 205 19.11.16 1669.85 Tender to be floated

12 Poonimangadu Intro 110/33 1x16 154 07.09.16 222.79 Tender to be floated

13 Odugathur (UG) 110/33/11 2x16 47 26.05.16 1419.16 Tender to be floated

14 Naduvalur (UG) 110/33/11 2x16 65 31.05.16 1991.85 Tender to be floated

15 Thaneerpandal 110/33-11 2x16+2x16 54 06.09.16 1262.2 Tender to be floated

16 Vellakarai 110/22 2x16 56 06.09.16 1364.71 Tender to be floated

Nallamanaickenpatty (Sattur
17 110/33/11 1x16+1x8 61 07.09.16 1237.74 Tender to be floated
Taluk)

18 Poondi Intro 110/33 1x16 165 22.09.16 259 Tender to be floated

19 Uppupalayam 110/22 2x16 71 02.11.16 896.13 Tender to be floated

Ganapathypalayam at
20 110/22 2x10 82 08.12.16 1337.89 Tender to be floated
Punjailalamangalam

21 Morappur. 110/33-11 2x16+1x16 83 09.12.16 1223.13 Tender to be floated

22 Noyyal 110/33-11 2x10 18 04.04.17 840.91 Tender to be floated

23 Karapattu 110/33 2x16 17 04.04.17 722.77 Tender to be floated

24 Erudayampattu 110/22 2x10 25 06.04.17 1332 Tender to be floated

25 Adhavathur 110/11 Proposal is under circulation

26 Mahindra Industrial Park 110/11 Proposal is under circulation

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi