0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
8 vues40 pages
This chapter discusses stability, which is an important requirement for control system design. There are three definitions of stability: stable, unstable, and marginally stable. Stability can be determined by analyzing the location of poles in the closed loop transfer function. The Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion provides a systematic way to determine stability by constructing a Routh table and analyzing it for sign changes. Special cases like zeros in the Routh table or all-zero rows are also addressed. Examples show how to apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion to determine stability and locate poles in various closed loop transfer functions.
This chapter discusses stability, which is an important requirement for control system design. There are three definitions of stability: stable, unstable, and marginally stable. Stability can be determined by analyzing the location of poles in the closed loop transfer function. The Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion provides a systematic way to determine stability by constructing a Routh table and analyzing it for sign changes. Special cases like zeros in the Routh table or all-zero rows are also addressed. Examples show how to apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion to determine stability and locate poles in various closed loop transfer functions.
This chapter discusses stability, which is an important requirement for control system design. There are three definitions of stability: stable, unstable, and marginally stable. Stability can be determined by analyzing the location of poles in the closed loop transfer function. The Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion provides a systematic way to determine stability by constructing a Routh table and analyzing it for sign changes. Special cases like zeros in the Routh table or all-zero rows are also addressed. Examples show how to apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion to determine stability and locate poles in various closed loop transfer functions.
Three basic requirements to enter into design of control systems ▪ Transient Response ▪ Stability ▪ Steady State Errors In this chapter we will discuss stability, a most important system specification Unstable systems cannot be designed for a specific transient response or steady state error requirement Three definitions associated with stability ▪ LTI system is Stable, if natural response approaches to zero as time approaches infinity ▪ LTI system is Unstable, if natural response grows without bounds as time approaches infinity ▪ LTI system is Marginally Stable, if natural response neither decays nor grows but remains constant or oscillates as time approaches infinity
Definition of stability implies only forced response
remains as natural response approaches zero From definition of natural response stability, ▪ System poles in left half plane yields either exponential decay or damped sinusoid responses ▪ Stable systems have closed loop transfer functions with poles only in left-half plane ▪ System poles in right half plane yields pure exponential increasing or exponentially increasing sinusoid response ▪ Unstable systems have closed loop transfer functions with at least one pole in the right half plane ▪ System poles on imaginary axis yields pure sinusoidal oscillations as natural response ▪ Marginally stable systems have closed loop transfer functions with only imaginary axis poles Here we cannot tell that given feedback control system is stable without solving for the roots Under certain conditions, some conclusions about stability of closed loop system are: If closed loop transfer functions has only left- half plane poles , then ▪ factor of denominator consists of product of terms such as (s+ai), where ai is real and positive or complex with positive real part ▪ Product of such terms is a polynomial with all positive coefficients ▪ No term of polynomial is missing If closed loop transfer functions has right half plane poles , then ▪ All signs of coefficients of denominator are not same ▪ If power of S is missing then system is either unstable or at the best marginally stable
Unfortunately, if all coefficients of denominator
are positive and not missing, we don’t have information about location of poles It is a method to test for stability without solving for the roots of denominator of closed loop systems By this method we can tell how many closed loop system poles are ▪ In left half plane ▪ In right half plane ▪ On imaginary axis But we cannot find their location This method requires two steps ▪ Generate data table called Ruth table ▪ Interpret Ruth table to tell how many closed loop system poles are in left half, right half or on jw- axis Power of this method lies in design rather than analysis Consider an equivalent closed loop transfer function
We are interested in system poles, so will
focus on to denominator only Begin with labeling the rows with power of S 𝑛 from highest power of 𝑆 to 𝑆 o Initial Layout for Routh Table Completed Routh Table Example 6.1: Make Routh table for system shown No . Of roots of polynomial that are in right half plane is equal to the no. of sign changes in the 1st column If there is no sign changes in the first column of Routh table. Then system is stable and all poles will lie in L.H.P Two special cases can occur ▪ Routh Hurwitz table sometimes will have a zero in the first column of a row ▪ Routh Hurwitz table sometimes will have an entire row that consists of zeros We will first consider case 1 i.e. zero will appear in the first column and tackle it by two ways ▪ replace Є with zero ▪ Reverse the co- efficient of S Example 6.2: Determine the stability of closed loop transfer function Example 6.3: Determine the stability of closed loop transfer function A special case of Routh Table in which entire row becomes zeros because there is an even polynomial that is a factor of original polynomial Example 6.4: Determine the number of right half plane poles in closed loop transfer function Entire row of zeros will appear in Routh table when a purely even is a factor of original polynomial e.g. 4 S +6S2+8 is an even polynomial; it has only even powers of S Even polynomials only have roots symmetrical around origin. Symmetry can occur under three conditions of root position ▪ Roots are symmetrical and real ▪ Roots are symmetrical and imaginary ▪ Roots are quadrental Example 6.5: For the given transfer function tell how many poles are in Right half plane, left half plane and on jw axis? 3 Since row S consists of all zero replace it with derivative of auxiliary equation Auxiliary equation is obtained from row above the row containing all zeros term In our case row S4 forms auxiliary equation i.e.
Replace derivative of auxiliary equation in row
S3 Now we draw conclusions about roots of even polynomial Since auxiliary equation was taken from S4 so even polynomial is of degree 4 No sign changes occur in even polynomial from S4 to S0 , so no R.H.P pole exist and due to symmetry no L.H.P will present. Hence even polynomial must have all four of its pole on jw axis Two sign changes from S8 to S4 . So two poles will be in R.H.P and remaining two poles will exists in L.H.P Example 6.6: For a given system find how many poles are in Right half plane, left half plane and on jw axis?
First find closed loop transfer function
Example 6.9: Find the range of gain K, for a given system to be stable, unstable, marginally stable. Assume K > 0
First find closed loop transfer function
For K (+ve) all entries in 1st column are positive except S1 . This can be +ve ,-ve or 0 depending upon value of K Three cases to consider ▪ If K < 1386 (stable) ▪ If K > 1386 (unstable) ▪ If K = 1386 (entire row become zero) Auxiliary polynomial will be
Its derivative will be
No sign changes in even polynomial means two poles exist on jw axis No sign changes in rows above even polynomial meaning other two poles will lie in L.H.P Therefore, given system is marginally stable for K=1386