Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
TIA/EIA
STANDARD
TIA/EIA-810-A
Telecommunications
Telephone Terminal Equipment
Transmission Requirements for
Narrowband Voice over IP and
Voice over PCM Digital Wireline
Telephones
TIA/EIA-810-A
(Upgrade and Revision of TIA/EIA/IS-810)
DECEMBER 2000
TIA/EIA Engineering Standards and Publications are designed to serve the public interest
through eliminating misunderstandings between manufacturers and purchasers, facilitating
interchangeability and improvement of products, and assisting the purchaser in selecting and
obtaining with minimum delay the proper product for his particular need. Existence of such
Standards and Publications shall not in any respect preclude any member or nonmember of
TIA/EIA from manufacturing or selling products not conforming to such Standards and
Publications, nor shall the existence of such Standards and Publications preclude their voluntary
use by those other than TIA/EIA members, whether the standard is to be used either domestically
or internationally.
Standards and Publications are adopted by TIA/EIA in accordance with the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) patent policy. By such action, TIA/EIA does not assume any liability
to any patent owner, nor does it assume any obligation whatever to parties adopting the Standard
or Publication.
This Standard does not purport to address all safety problems associated with its use or all
applicable regulatory requirements. It is the responsibility of the user of this Standard to
establish appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations before its use.
(From Standards Proposal No. 4352-URV, formulated under the cognizance of the TIA TR-41.3
Subcommittee on Analog and Digital Wireline Terminals.)
Published by
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION 2000
Standards and Technology Department
2500 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22201
DON'T VIOLATE
THE
LAW!
This document is copyrighted by the TIA and may not be reproduced without
permission.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1
2. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................ 2
2.1. LIMITS OF APPLICABILITY ................................................................................................ 2
2.2. CATEGORIES OF CRITERIA ................................................................................................ 2
2.3. FCC PART 68....................................................................................................................... 2
2.4. ENVIRONMENTAL .............................................................................................................. 2
2.5. SAFETY ................................................................................................................................ 2
3. NORMATIVE REFERENCES................................................................................................ 3
4. DEFINITIONS, ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS..................................................... 5
4.1. CODEC ................................................................................................................................. 5
4.2. EAR REFERENCE POINT (ERP).......................................................................................... 5
4.3. HATS POSITION.................................................................................................................. 5
4.4. MOUTH REFERENCE POINT (MRP) .................................................................................. 5
4.5. QUIET AND FULL SCALE CODE ........................................................................................ 5
4.6. REFERENCE CODEC ........................................................................................................... 5
4.7. DIRECT DIGITAL PROCESSING ......................................................................................... 6
4.8. SOUND PRESSURE LEVELS................................................................................................ 7
4.9. ELECTRIC POWER AND NOISE LEVELS ........................................................................... 7
4.10. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................................................. 7
5. HANDSET TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS....................................................................... 9
5.1. HANDSET FREQUENCY RESPONSE................................................................................... 9
5.1.1. Handset Send Frequency Response .............................................................................. 9
5.1.2. Handset Receive Frequency Response ....................................................................... 11
5.2. HANDSET LOUDNESS RATINGS AND RECEIVE VOLUME CONTROL .......................... 13
5.2.1. Handset Send Loudness Rating (SLR) ....................................................................... 13
5.2.2. Handset Receive Loudness Rating.............................................................................. 13
5.2.3. Handset Receive Volume Control .............................................................................. 14
5.2.4. Handset Talker Sidetone............................................................................................. 14
5.3. HANDSET NOISE ............................................................................................................... 14
5.3.1. Handset Send Noise .................................................................................................... 14
5.3.2. Handset Send Single Frequency Interference ............................................................. 14
5.3.3. Handset Receive Noise ............................................................................................... 15
5.3.4. Handset Receive Single Frequency Interference ........................................................ 15
5.4. HANDSET RECEIVE COMFORT NOISE (ADVISORY) ..................................................... 16
5.4.1. General........................................................................................................................ 16
5.4.2. Measurement Method ................................................................................................. 16
5.4.3. Requirement ................................................................................................................ 16
5.5. HANDSET DISTORTION AND NOISE ............................................................................... 16
5.5.1. Handset Send Distortion and Noise ............................................................................ 17
i
TIA/EIA-810-A
5.5.2. Handset Receive Distortion and Noise........................................................................17
5.6. WEIGHTED TERMINAL COUPLING LOSS (TCLW) .........................................................18
5.6.1. Measurement Method..................................................................................................18
5.6.2. Requirements...............................................................................................................19
5.7. STABILITY LOSS ...............................................................................................................20
5.7.1. Measurement Method..................................................................................................20
5.7.2. Requirement ................................................................................................................20
5.8. LONG DURATION MAXIMUM ACOUSTIC PRESSURE (STEADY STATE INPUT)..........21
5.8.1. General ........................................................................................................................21
5.8.2. Measurement Method..................................................................................................21
5.8.3. Requirements...............................................................................................................22
5.9. SHORT DURATION (PEAK) ACOUSTIC PRESSURE .........................................................22
5.9.1. General ........................................................................................................................22
5.9.2. Measurement Method..................................................................................................22
5.9.3. Requirements...............................................................................................................23
5.10. PACKET VOICE LATENCY (ADVISORY) .........................................................................23
5.10.1. Handset Send Latency ................................................................................................24
5.10.2. Handset Receive Latency ...........................................................................................24
6. HEADSET TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS......................................................................25
6.1. HEADSET FREQUENCY RESPONSE..................................................................................25
6.1.1. Headset Send Frequency Response .............................................................................25
6.1.2. Headset Receive Frequency Response ........................................................................26
6.2. HEADSET LOUDNESS RATINGS .......................................................................................27
6.2.1. Headset Send Loudness Rating ...................................................................................27
6.2.2. Headset Receive Loudness Rating ..............................................................................27
6.2.3. Headset Talker Sidetone..............................................................................................28
6.3. HEADSET NOISE ................................................................................................................29
6.3.1. Headset Send Noise.....................................................................................................29
6.3.2. Headset Send Single Frequency Interference..............................................................29
6.3.3. Headset Receive Noise ................................................................................................30
6.3.4. Headset Receive Single Frequency Interference.........................................................30
6.4. HEADSET DISTORTION AND NOISE ................................................................................30
6.4.1. Headset Send Distortion and Noise.............................................................................31
6.4.2. Headset Receive Distortion and Noise........................................................................31
6.5. WEIGHTED TERMINAL COUPLING LOSS (TCLW) .........................................................32
6.5.1. Measurement Method..................................................................................................32
6.5.2. Requirements...............................................................................................................32
6.6. LONG DURATION MAXIMUM ACOUSTIC PRESSURE (STEADY STATE INPUT)..........33
6.6.1. General ........................................................................................................................33
6.6.2. Measurement Method..................................................................................................34
6.6.3. Requirements...............................................................................................................34
6.7. SHORT DURATION (PEAK) ACOUSTIC PRESSURE .........................................................34
6.7.1. General ........................................................................................................................34
6.7.2. Measurement Method..................................................................................................35
6.7.3. Requirements...............................................................................................................35
ii
TIA/EIA-810-A
7. HANDSFREE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS (ADVISORY) ...................................... 36
7.1. HANDSFREE FREQUENCY RESPONSE ............................................................................ 36
7.1.1. Handsfree Send Frequency Response......................................................................... 36
7.1.2. Handsfree Receive Frequency Response .................................................................... 38
7.2. HANDSFREE LOUDNESS RATINGS AND RECEIVE VOLUME CONTROL ..................... 40
7.2.1. Handsfree Send Loudness Rating ............................................................................... 40
7.2.2. Handsfree Receive Loudness Rating .......................................................................... 40
7.2.3. Handsfree Receive Volume Control ........................................................................... 40
7.3. HANDSFREE NOISE .......................................................................................................... 40
7.3.1. Handsfree Send Noise................................................................................................. 40
7.3.2. Handsfree Send Single Frequency Interference.......................................................... 41
7.3.3. Handsfree Receive Noise............................................................................................ 41
7.3.4. Handsfree Receive Single Frequency Interference..................................................... 42
7.4. HANDSFREE DISTORTION AND NOISE ........................................................................... 42
7.4.1. Handsfree Send Distortion and Noise......................................................................... 42
7.4.2. Handsfree Receive Distortion and Noise.................................................................... 43
7.5. WEIGHTED TERMINAL COUPLING LOSS (TCLW) ........................................................ 43
7.5.1. Measurement Method ................................................................................................. 43
7.5.2. Requirements .............................................................................................................. 43
7.6. STABILITY LOSS ............................................................................................................... 44
7.6.1. Measurement Method ................................................................................................. 44
7.6.2. Requirement ................................................................................................................ 44
8. QUALITY OF SERVICE (ADVISORY) .............................................................................. 45
8.1. EQUIPMENT IMPAIRMENT FACTOR, IE .......................................................................... 45
8.2. PACKET LOSS.................................................................................................................... 45
8.3. QOS .................................................................................................................................... 47
ANNEX A (INFORMATIVE) – CALCULATION OF LOUDNESS RATINGS......................... 50
ANNEX B (INFORMATIVE) – MEASUREMENT AND LEVEL CONVERSIONS................. 53
ANNEX C (INFORMATIVE) – PREFERRED 1/12 OCTAVE FREQUENCIES....................... 55
iii
TIA/EIA-810-A
FOREWORD
Name Representing
Ron Magnuson Siemens Chair
Roger Britt Nortel Networks Editor
John Bareham Consultant in Electroacoustics
Kevin Cross Malden Electronics Ltd.
Steve Graham Nortel Networks
Phil Holland Circa Communications Ltd.
Michael Knappe Cisco Systems
Ken Simpson Simon Fraser University Engineering Student
Stephen Whitesell Lucent Technologies TR-41.3 Chair
Allen Woo Plantronics
Bob Young Bob Young Associates
Copyrighted parts of ITU-T Appendix I to Recommendation G.113 and Recommendation P.79 are
used with permission of the ITU. The ITU owns the copyright for the ITU Recommendations.
Copyrighted parts of ISO 3 are used with permission of the ISO. The ISO owns the copyright for the
ISO Standards.
The three annexes in this Standard are informative and are not considered part of this Standard.
Suggestions for improvement of this standard are welcome. They should be sent to:
iv
TIA/EIA-810-A
1. Introduction
This revision of TIA/EIA/IS-810 establishes handset, headset and handsfree telephone audio
performance requirements for digital wireline telephones regardless protocol or digital format. A
number of improvements and corrections have been made, particularly related to single frequency
interference and acoustic pressure.
This standard only addresses conventional narrowband performance, where narrowband is defined as
the frequency range between 300 and 3400 Hz. Wideband telephony, in the frequency range between
150 and 6800 Hz, is an enhancement that is likely to offered by VoIP telephones. The performance
requirements of wideband telephony will be addressed in a future TIA/EIA standard.
1
TIA/EIA-810-A
2. Scope
This standard establishes voice performance requirements for narrowband digital wireline telephones
with codecs that conform to the ITU-T G-Series Recommendations and where transmission is in
digital format. A telephone is defined as a device that terminates networks and provides telephony
voice service. Transmission may be over Local Area Networks, Firewire/IEEE1394, Universal Serial
Bus (USB), public ISDN or digital over twisted pair wire. Applications include Voice over Internet
Protocol (VoIP) and PCM-based telephones, whether connected through modems, gateways, or PBXs
and personal computer-based telephones that may or may not have handsets.
Technical requirements are set for handset, headset and handsfree (speakerphone) modes of
operation. Quality of Service is also addressed in Section 8. These requirements apply regardless of
the technology used to couple the handset or headset to the telephone. Coupling may be by a cord, a
short range air interface such as, but not limited to, a radio interface, an electric field interface, a
magnetic field interface or an infra-red interface.
The loudness ratings in this standard intentionally differ from loss plan published in the PBX
standard ANSI/TIA/EIA-464-B. At the time of approval of this standard, Project, PN-3673, was
active to revise the ANSI/TIA/EIA-464-B loss plan to agree with this standard and extend its
applicability to IP Gateways. Mixing digital telephone loudness ratings and PBX/Gateway loss plans
may not provide optimum performance.
2.4. Environmental
The telephone will also be subject to the applicable environmental conditions specified in EIA/TIA-
571.
2.5. Safety
This standard does not contain safety requirements. Compliance with the applicable UL and CSA
safety standards may be required in certain locations.
2
TIA/EIA-810-A
3. Normative References
The following standards contain provisions, which, through reference in this text, constitute
provisions of this Standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All
standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on this Standard are encouraged to
investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the standards indicated below, or
their successors. ANSI and TIA maintain registers of currently valid national standards published by
them.
[6] ANSI/IEEE Standard 661-1979 (Reaff 1998), Standard Method for Determining Objective
Loudness Ratings of Telephone Connections.
[10] 47 CFR Part 68, Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network.
[11] ITU-T Recommendation G.107 (1998), The E-Model, A Computational Model for use in
Transmission Planning.
[16] ITU-T Recommendation G.122 (1993), Loudness ratings (LRs) of national systems.
3
TIA/EIA-810-A
[18] ITU-T Recommendation G.175 (1997), Transmission planning for private/public network
interconnection of voice traffic.
[19] ITU-T Recommendation G.711 (1988), Pulse code Modulation (PCM) of voice frequencies.
[21] ITU-T Recommendation G.723.1 (1996), Dual rate speech coder for multimedia
communications transmitting at 5.3 and 6.3 kbit/s.
[22] ITU-T Recommendation G.729 (1996), Coding of speech at 8 kbit/s using conjugate-
structure algebraic-code-excited linear-prediction (CS-ACELP).
[23] ITU-T Recommendation O.41 (1994), Psophometer for use on telephone-type circuits.
[24] ITU-T Recommendation O.131 (1988), Quantizing distortion measuring equipment using a
pseudo-random noise test signal.
[26] ITU-T Recommendation P.56 (1993), Objective measurement of active speech level.
[28] ITU-T Recommendation P.58 (1996), Head and torso simulator for telephonometry.
[30] ITU-T Recommendation P.79 (1999), Calculation of loudness ratings for telephone sets.
[31] ITU-T Recommendation P.310 (1996), Transmission characteristics for telephone band (300
- 3400 Hz) digital telephones.
[32] ITU-T Recommendation P.360 (1998), Efficiency of devices for preventing the occurrence of
excessive acoustic pressure by telephone receivers.
[33] ITU-T Recommendation P.501 (1996), Test signals for use in telephonometry.
[35] ETSI EG 201 377-1 (1999), Specification and measurement of speech transmission quality;
Part 1: Introduction to objective comparison measurement methods for one-way speech
quality across networks.
4
TIA/EIA-810-A
4.1. Codec
A codec is a combination of an analog-to-digital encoder and a digital-to-analog decoder operating in
opposite directions of transmission in the same equipment.
Table 1 – PCM Codes for Zero (Quiet Code) and Full Scale
Mu-Law A-Law
Level
Sign Bit Chord Bit Step Bits Sign Bit Chord Bits Step Bits
+ Full Scale 1 000 0000 1 010 1010
+ Zero 1 111 1111 1 101 0101
- Zero 0 111 1111 0 101 0101
- Full Scale 0 000 0000 0 010 1010
When a 0.775 volt rms analog signal is applied to the coder input, a 0 dBm0 digital code is present at
the digital reference. When a 0 dBm0 digital code is applied to the decoder, a 0.775 volt rms analog
signal appears at the decoder output. At the digital reference point 0 dBm0 is 3.14 (A-law) or 3.17
(mu-law) dB below digital full scale.
5
TIA/EIA-810-A
This implementation of a reference codec eliminates the 600 ohm source and load resistors specified
by other standards. The coder input impedance is high relative to the generator and the decoder
output impedance is low relative to the measuring voltmeter.
The interface block, shown in Figures 1 and 2, passes the voice channel digital bit stream to the
terminal without modification. There is no gain or loss in the send or receive direction due to the
interface. If the interface does change the digital voice stream then the terminal and interface shall be
considered jointly as the terminal. An example of this is a receive volume control implemented in a
PBX or gateway.
Digital Reference
Point
(Junction j)
Send
vS E N D
pM Decoder v
Mouth Sound Pressure
at MRP Digital
Interface
Set
pE Coder GEN
Ear Sound Pressure
at ERP
vRCV
Receive Reference Codec
Figure 2 – Digital Telephone Set Test Arrangement using Direct Digital Generation and
Analysis
Digital Reference
Point
(Junction j)
Send
pM Digital
Analysis
Mouth Sound Pressure
at MRP Digital
Interface
Set
pE Digital
Generation
Ear Sound Pressure
at ERP
Receive
6
TIA/EIA-810-A
dBPa: The sound pressure level, in decibels of a sound is 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of
the ratio of the pressure of this sound to the reference pressure of
1 Pascal (Pa). Note: 1 Pa = 1 N/m2.
dBSPL: The sound pressure level, in decibels of a sound is 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of
the ratio of the pressure of this sound to the reference pressure of
2 X 10-5 N/m2 (0 dBPa = 94 dBSPL).
dBA: The A-weighted sound level is the sound pressure level in dBSPL, weighted by use of
metering characteristics and A-weighting specified in ANSI S1.4.
dBm0: The absolute power level at a digital reference point of the same signal that would be
measured as the absolute power level, in dBm, if the reference point was analog. The
absolute power in dBm is defined as 10 log (power in mW / 1 mW). When the impedance
is 600 ohm resistive, dBm can be referred to a voltage of 0.775 volts, which results in a
reference active power of 1 mW. Note that 0 dBm0 is not the maximum digital code. For
Mu Law codecs 0 dBm0 is 3.17 dB below digital full scale. For A Law codecs 0 dBm0 is
3.14 dB below digital full scale.
dBm0p: The noise level, measured by a psophometer with a special noise weighting filter as
described in ITU-T Recommendations O.41 and P.53. The small letter “p” comes from the
French word “ponderé”. The equivalent English word is “weighted”, but the “p” refers
specifically to psophometric weighting.
7
TIA/EIA-810-A
PL Packet Loss
PLC Packet Loss Concealment
PoW Poor or Worse
QoS Quality of Service
RLR Receive Loudness Rating
RTP Recommended Test Position
SLR Send Loudness Rating
STMR Sidetone Masking Rating
TCLt Temporally weighted Terminal Coupling Loss
TCLw Weighted Terminal Coupling Loss
VAD Voice Activity Detector
VoIP Voice over Internet Protocol
8
TIA/EIA-810-A
• Encoding and decoding is assuming to be G.711 in mu-law. In particular, this applies to the
requirements in the Distortion and Noise sections.
Algorithmic processes, such as Echo Control, VAD and AGC, may influence the test results or
require test signals other than sinewaves. ITU-T Recommendation P.64 allows several types of test
signals. The test signal used should be stated. The test signal levels specified in this standard shall be
used. Test signal levels that differ from those specified in this standard may also be required.
Packet voice latency may introduce significant delay that must be accounted for by the test
equipment.
Equipment using nonlinear voice signal processing may require subjective testing.
Suitable artificial ears for tests involving the handset receiver are documented in ITU-T
Recommendation P.57. The correct artificial ear is selected by the size, ear coupling method,
impedance and bandwidth characteristics of the device under test. All tests involving the handset
receiver shall be done with the same artificial ear. All test reports shall document the model of
artificial ear used in the tests.
Where
SMJ Send Sensitivity, Mouth to Junction, at Fi.
PM Sound pressure at the MRP at Fi.
VSEND RMS output voltage of the reference codec at Fi.
The send frequency response is measured according to ITU-T Recommendation P.64 using the
measurement set-up shown in Figure 3. The test signal level shall be -4.7 dBPa at the MRP.
9
TIA/EIA-810-A
vS E N D
Send
pM Decoder v
Measuring
GEN
Digital
Interface Amplifier
Set
Mouth Simulator Coder
Quiet Room
Reference Codec
5.1.1.2. Requirement
The send frequency response shall be below the upper limit and above the lower limit defined in
Table 2 and shown in Figure 4. The limit curves shall be determined by straight lines joining
successive co-ordinates given in the table, when frequency response is plotted on a linear scale
against frequency on a logarithmic scale. Note: The frequency response mask is a floating or “best
fit” mask.
10
TIA/EIA-810-A
10
Arbitrary Level (dB)
-10
-20
100 1000 10000
Frequency (Hz)
Where
SJE Receive Sensitivity, Junction to Ear, at Fi.
PE ERP Sound pressure measured by ear simulator at Fi. Measurements collected
at other points, e.g., DRP and free field, must be corrected back to ERP.
VRCV RMS Input voltage to the reference codec at Fi.
11
TIA/EIA-810-A
Receive pE
Decoder
Ear
Simulator
Digital
Interface
Set
Sound Pressure
Measuring
Coder GEN
Amplifier
vRCV
Quiet Room Reference Codec
5.1.2.2. Requirement
The receive frequency response shall be below the upper limit and above the lower limit defined in
Table 3 and shown in Figure 6. The limit curves shall be determined by straight lines joining
successive co-ordinates given in the table, when frequency response is plotted on a linear scale
against frequency on a logarithmic scale. Note: The frequency response mask is a floating or “best
fit” mask.
12
TIA/EIA-810-A
10
Arbitrary Level (dB)
-10
-20
100 1000 10000
Frequency (Hz)
5.2.1.2. Requirement
The terminal should be designed to have a nominal SLR value of 8 dB, with a tolerance of ±4.0 dB.
13
TIA/EIA-810-A
5.2.2.2. Requirement
The terminal should be designed to have a nominal RLR value of 2 dB, with a tolerance of ±4.0 dB.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be tested at the minimum, nominal and maximum
settings. For the nominal setting, adjust the level so that the RLR is as close as possible to the
nominal RLR value.
5.2.4.2. Requirement
The value of STMR shall be within the range of 18 dB ± 6 dB, for any adjustable receive level.
5.3.1.3. Requirement
The send noise shall be less than -68 dBm0p.
14
TIA/EIA-810-A
weighted noise level characteristics in narrow bands of not more than 31 Hz, which can then be
compared to the overall weighted background noise level.
5.3.2.3. Requirement
The send single frequency interference shall be less than -78 dBm0p.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value when driven by quiet code.
5.3.3.3. Requirement
The receive noise shall be less than 38 dBA.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value when driven by quiet code.
15
TIA/EIA-810-A
5.3.4.3. Requirement
The receive single frequency interference shall be 10 dB quieter than the A-weighted broadband
noise floor.
5.4.1. General
The receive comfort noise of a digital telephone is the short-term average background noise level
measured at the output of the telephone receiver with the digital telephone receiving either a silence
indication packet from the transmitting telephone or no packets from the transmitting telephone for
some non-transient period of time.
With both VAD disabled at the transmitting source and comfort noise generation on the receiving
unit under test turned off, a white noise test signal should be sent from the transmitting end such that
the receive noise level measured at the receiving telephone is 48 dBA. This test signal at this level
will be assigned the level of ‘N dB’ as a calibrated point for the purpose of the comfort noise test,
since it may be generated either as an acoustic signal at a ‘golden’ transmitting telephone (and
measured in dBA) or injected digitally (and measured in dBm0p).
The following test sequence must be followed for all calibrated test noise levels of ‘M dB’, which
will range from N-10 to N+10 dB.
3. 300-3400 Hz band-limited white noise of level M dB is inserted at the transmitting point for 130
seconds.
4. During the final 10 seconds of level M noise insertion, the acoustic noise level at the receive will
be measured.
5.4.3. Requirement
For all input noise levels M in the range of N-10 to N+10, with N calibrated to give 48 dBA receive
noise levels at the receiver, acoustic noise levels measured at the receiver must be within +0.5/-3.0
dB of the expected acoustic receive noise level for that input. This expected receive noise level for
any given M and N would be 48 dBA – (N-M).
16
TIA/EIA-810-A
Note: In cases where the sound pressure exceeds +6 dBPa, the linearity of the artificial mouth should
be checked, as it exceeds the limits of ITU-T Recommendation P.51.
5.5.1.2. Requirement
The ratio of signal-to-total distortion and noise power of the digitally encoded signal output shall be
above the limits given in Table 4. Limits for intermediate levels are found by drawing straight lines
between the breaking points in the table on a linear (dB signal level) – linear (dB ratio) scale.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value.
5.5.2.2. Requirement
The ratio of signal-to-total distortion and noise power measured in the artificial ear, with A-
weighting applied, shall be above the limits given in Table 5, unless the signal in the artificial ear
exceeds +10 dBPa or is less than –50 dBPa.
17
TIA/EIA-810-A
The use of echo control devices on the handset can affect the measurement of TCLw. The result
would likely be different under cases of either single far-end talker or double-talk. The TCLw
measurement is intended to represent a single far-end talker. This may provide idealized and
unrealistic performance measurements when non-linear processing on the transmit side is used as
part of the echo control algorithm. It may be more appropriate to measure TCLw either with non-
linear processing disabled or with a near-end signal present that is a) capable of enabling echo
control’s double-talk detector with the subsequent removal of non-linear processing and b) can be
filtered out from the final return signal so as not to affect the accuracy of the TCLw measurement.
The latter may be the only method that can used consistently across products in a black-box testing
setup. A suitable signal may be a pulsed sine wave, but will depend on the temporal characteristics of
the double-talk detector.
The ‘proper’ measurement of TCLw then becomes specific to the echo control implementation.
These issues are still under study and are not addressed in these requirements. For further
information see IEEE 1329, Clause 11.
For devices that incorporate non-linear processes, additional measurements using signal levels of
-26 dBm0 and -10 dBm0 may be performed.
Noise and reflections in the test space must not influence the measurement. The test should be
performed in an anechoic chamber with the handset positioned at least 50 cm away from the nearest
part of the test chamber. The ambient noise level shall be less than 30 dBA.
18
TIA/EIA-810-A
The test signal is white noise, band limited to 100 through 4000 Hz, and modulated at a rate of 250
ms ON and 150 ms OFF. The measurement and calibration shall be determined during the ON
portions of the signal. Sine wave signals may be used with G.711 codecs.
The attenuation from digital input to digital output is measured at 1/12 octave frequencies as given
by the R.40-series of preferred numbers in ISO 3 for frequencies from 290 to 3255 Hz, using the
measurement arrangement shown in Figure 7. See Annex C.
The weighted terminal coupling loss is calculated according to ITU-T Recommendation G.122
(1993) Annex B, Section B.4 (trapezoidal rule).
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be tested at the nominal setting. For the nominal
setting, adjust the level so that the RLR is as close as possible to the nominal RLR value.
Handset Suspended
vS E N D ( E c h o R e t u r n )
Decoder v
Digital
Interface
Set
Coder GEN
vRCV
Anechoic Chamber Reference Codec
5.6.2. Requirements
The normalized value of TCLw loss shall be greater than 52 dB for IP sets and 45 dB for PCM sets
when measured under free field conditions and with SLR normalized to 8 dB and RLR normalized to
2 dB. It is desirable that the normalized value of TCLw for IP sets to be greater than 55 dB and that
the normalized value of TCLw for PCM sets be greater than 50 dB to meet ITU-T Recommendation
G.131 talker echo objective requirements.
For example, if the measured TCLw is 48 dB, the measured SLR is 11 dB and the measured RLR is
0 dB, then the normalized value of TCLw = 48 dB + (8 - 11) dB + (2 - 0) dB = 47 dB.
NOTE 1: If equipped with adjustable receive level, the TCLw will decrease in proportion with the
increased gain relative to the nominal RLR in most cases. For example, if the measured
TCLw is 45 dB at nominal RLR and the adjustable receive level adds 12 dB of gain, then
TCLw (maximum receive level) = 45 dB - 12 dB = 33 dB.
NOTE 2: The echo impairment perceived by the person at the opposite end of the connection from a
telephone set is a function of the magnitude of the talker echo signal as well as the talker
echo path delay. The echo signal becomes more disturbing as the talker echo path delay
increases. Thus, a telephone set with adequate TCLw performance on low delay
19
TIA/EIA-810-A
connections may provide satisfactory performance while the same may not be true for
connections that have a long delay.
NOTE 3: Temporally weighted terminal coupling loss (TCLt) is an alternate method for echo
measurement, which may be more subjectively relevant, especially in devices with echo
suppression or cancellation features. (See IEEE Standard 1329-1999.) The performance
requirements may need to be changed when using this method. This issue is currently
under study.
For devices that incorporated non-linear processes, additional measurements using signal levels of
–26 dBm0 and –10 dBm0 may be performed.
5.7.1.1. Method 1
Place the handset in the reference corner, as shown in Figure 8, with the earcap and mouthpiece
facing a hard, smooth surface. The handset shall be placed along the diagonal from the apex of the
reference corner to the outside corner, with the earcap end of the handset 250 mm from the apex. The
telephone set shall be fully active.
The reference corner consists of three perpendicular plane, smooth, hard surfaces extending 0.5 m
from the apex of the corner.
5.7.1.2. Method 2
Place the handset with the earcap and mouthpiece facing a hard, smooth surface free of any other
object for 0.5 m. The telephone set shall be fully active.
5.7.2. Requirement
The stability loss, i.e., minimum loss, at any frequency shall be greater than 6 dB. It is desirable that
this loss be greater than 10 dB.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive level should maintain stability over the entire range of
adjustable receive levels.
20
TIA/EIA-810-A
25 cm
50 cm
Additional consideration should be given to the acoustic pressure caused by tones, other audio
signals or long duration, high amplitude electrical signals applied to power, network, handset or
auxiliary leads of the digital telephone.
Apply a digital square wave to the receive input, switched between the maximum positive and the
maximum negative values (see Table 1), as defined in ITU-T Recommendation G.711. The switching
rate shall range from 1 Hz to 4000 Hz over a sweep time of not less than 30 seconds. The
measurement shall be made with a RMS detector set to 1 second effective averaging time (RMS
Slow).
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted to the maximum setting.
Maximum acoustic pressure limits can be referenced to the ERP, DRP, free field (0 degrees elevation
and azimuth) or to a diffuse field, as required by the appropriate safety standard. This may require
that measurements made at one reference point be translated to the required reference point.
21
TIA/EIA-810-A
For types 2, 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4 ear simulators, DRP to ERP transformation shall be performed by adding
the values in table 2b/P.57 of ITU-T Recommendation P.57 to the data measured at the DRP. For
type 3.2 ear simulators, DRP to ERP transformation shall be performed by using the transfer function
supplied by the manufacturer of the ear simulator.
Transformation to free field or diffuse field shall be made using the transfer function supplied by the
manufacturer of the ear simulator, if available. Alternatively, the transfer functions specified in ITU-
T P.58 may be used. Transfer functions with resolution of at least 1/12 octave or R40 format shall be
used if available.
Maximum acoustic pressure measurements shall be made on the same ear simulator and with the
same positioning and force as used for receive frequency response measurements. For handsets
measured on a type 3.3 or type 3.4 ear simulator, one additional measurement shall be made using a
force of 15 N. If both measurements fall below the applicable performance limit, the measurement
that most closely approaches the limit shall be taken as the final result. If one or both measurements
exceed the limit, the one that most exceeds the limit shall be taken as the final result.
5.8.3. Requirements
The requirements are currently under study.
This short duration test stresses nonlinear processes, like AGC, and doesn’t directly replace a short
duration surge. Additional consideration should be given to the peak acoustic pressure caused by
tones or short duration, high amplitude electrical pulses applied to power, network, handset or
auxiliary leads of the digital telephone.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted to the maximum setting.
Peak acoustic pressure limits can be referenced to the ERP, DRP, free field (0 degrees elevation and
azimuth) or to a diffuse field, as required by the appropriate safety standard. This may require that
measurements made at one reference point be translated to the required reference point. The
translations shall be implemented using a minimum phase, parametric filter (or equivalent) as peak
measurements must be made in real time. Both the magnitude and phase of the transfer function is
necessary to best preserve the waveshape for a proper measurement of its peak value.
The filter parameters for transformation from DRP to ERP shall be based on the transfer function
specified in Section 5.8.2. The filter parameters for transformation to free field or diffuse field shall
22
TIA/EIA-810-A
be made using the transfer function supplied by the manufacturer of the ear simulator, if available.
Alternatively, the transfer function specified in ITU-T P.58 can be used. Transfer functions with
resolution of at least 1/12 octave or R40 format shall be used if available.
The magnitude of the filter response shall follow the transfer function within a tolerance of ±1dB.
In practice, most devices will pass peak acoustic limits without the reduction provided by the
translation filter. In these cases, the filter may not be required.
Maximum acoustic pressure measurements shall be made on the same ear simulator and with the
same positioning and force as used for receive frequency response measurements. For handsets
measured on a type 3.3 or type 3.4 ear simulator, one additional measurement shall be made using a
force of 15 N. If both measurements fall below the applicable performance limit, the measurement
that most closely approaches the limit shall be taken as the final result. If one or both measurements
exceed the limit, the one that most exceeds the limit shall be taken as the final result.
≤ 500 ms ≥ 500 ms
maximum positive
digital word
maximum negative
digital word
5.9.3. Requirements
The requirements are currently under study.
23
TIA/EIA-810-A
An acoustic signal of –4.7 dBPa should be generated at the artificial mouth. The delay between the
time the pulse left the mouth to the time it was received at the telephone’s network interface should
be measured.
5.10.1.3. Requirement
The send latency should be 35 ms or less with a maximum speech frame rate of 20 ms and with one
speech frame per packet.
A pulsed digital signal of –16 dBm0 should be injected as packets to the telephone’s network
interface. The delay between the time the packet was injected at the telephone network interface to
the time it was received at the artificial ear should be measured.
5.10.2.3. Requirement
The receive latency should be 65 ms or less with a maximum speech frame rate of 20 ms and with
one speech frame per packet.
24
TIA/EIA-810-A
• Encoding and decoding is assuming to be G.711 in mu-law. In particular, this applies to the
requirements in the Distortion and Noise sections.
Algorithmic processes, such as Echo Control, VAD and AGC, may influence the test results or
require test signals other than sinewaves. ITU-T Recommendation P.64 allows several types of test
signals. The test signal used should be stated. The test signal levels specified in this standard shall be
used. Test signal levels that differ from those specified in this standard may also be required.
Packet voice latency may introduce significant delay that must be accounted for by the test
equipment.
Equipment using nonlinear voice signal processing may require subjective testing.
Suitable artificial ears for tests involving the headset receiver are documented in ITU-T
Recommendation P.57. The correct artificial ear is selected by the size, ear coupling method,
impedance and bandwidth characteristics of the device under test. All tests involving the handset
receiver shall be done with the same artificial ear. All test reports shall document the model of
artificial ear used in the tests.
6.1.1.2. Requirement
The send frequency response shall be below the upper limit and above the lower limit defined in
Table 6 and shown in Figure 10. The limit curves shall be determined by straight lines joining
successive co-ordinates given in the table, when frequency response is plotted on a linear scale
against frequency on a logarithmic scale. Note: The frequency response mask is a floating or “best
fit” mask.
25
TIA/EIA-810-A
10
Arbitrary Level (dB)
-10
-20
100 1000 10000
Frequency (Hz)
26
TIA/EIA-810-A
6.1.2.2. Requirement
The receive frequency response shall be below the upper limit and above the lower limit defined in
Table 7 and shown in Figure 11. The limit curves shall be determined by straight lines joining
successive co-ordinates given in the table, when frequency response is plotted on a linear scale
against frequency on a logarithmic scale. Note: The frequency response mask is a floating or “best
fit” mask.
6.2.1.2. Requirement
The terminal should be designed to have a nominal SLR value of 8 dB, with a tolerance of ±5.0 dB.
6.2.2.2. Requirement
The monaural terminal should have a nominal RLR value of 0 dB, with a tolerance of ±4.0 dB. The
binaural terminal should have a nominal RLR value of 6 dB, with a tolerance of ±4.0 dB, for each of
the receivers measured separately.
Note 1: Headset RLRs are louder than handset RLRs to compensate for lack of noise occlusion.
Note 2: Either the terminal or the headset should have a receive volume control that is capable of
amplification and attenuation.
27
TIA/EIA-810-A
10
Arbitrary Level (dB)
-10
-20
100 1000 10000
Frequency (Hz)
28
TIA/EIA-810-A
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be tested at the minimum, nominal and maximum
settings. For the nominal setting, adjust the level so that the RLR is as close as possible to the
nominal RLR value.
6.2.3.2. Requirement
For any adjustable receive level, the value of STMR shall be within the range of 21 dB ± 6 dB for
supraural, 18 dB ± 6 dB for insert, 18 dB ± 6 dB for interconchial. The value of STMR for binaural
terminals should be 6 dB quieter, for each of the receivers measured separately.
6.3.1.1. General
The send noise of a digital telephone is the 5 second average background noise at the digital transmit
output with the headset transmitter isolated from sound input and mechanical disturbances.
6.3.1.3. Requirement
The send noise shall be no greater than -64 dBm0p.
29
TIA/EIA-810-A
6.3.2.3. Requirement
The send single frequency interference shall be no greater than -74 dBm0p.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value when driven by quiet code.
6.3.3.3. Requirement
The receive noise shall be less than 40 dBA for a monaural headset. The receive noise for binaural
headsets should be less than 32 dBA, for each of the receivers measured separately.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value when driven by quiet code.
6.3.4.3. Requirement
The receive single frequency interference shall be 10 dB quieter than the A-weighted broadband
noise floor.
30
TIA/EIA-810-A
Note: In cases where the sound pressure exceeds +6 dBPa, the linearity of the artificial mouth should
be checked, as it exceeds the limits of ITU-T Recommendation P.51.
6.4.1.2. Requirement
The ratio of signal-to-total distortion and noise power of the digitally encoded signal output shall be
above the limits given in Table 8. Limits for intermediate levels are found by drawing straight lines
between the breaking points in the table on a linear (dB signal level) – linear (dB ratio) scale.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value.
6.4.2.2. Requirement
The ratio of signal-to-total distortion and noise power measured in the artificial ear, with A-
weighting applied, shall be above the limits given in Table 9, unless the signal in the artificial ear
exceeds +10 dBPa or is less than –50 dBPa.
31
TIA/EIA-810-A
For devices that incorporate non-linear processes, additional measurements using signal levels of
-26 dBm0 and -10 dBm0 may be performed.
Noise and reflections in the test space must not influence the measurement. The test should be
performed in an anechoic chamber with the headset positioned at least 50 cm away from the nearest
part of the test chamber. The ambient noise level shall be less than 30 dBA.
The test signal is white noise, band limited to 100 through 4000 Hz, and modulated at a rate of 250
ms ON and 150 ms OFF. The measurement and calibration shall be determined during the ON
portions of the signal. Sine wave signals may be used with G.711 codecs.
The attenuation from digital input to digital output is measured at 1/12 octave frequencies as given
by the R.40-series of preferred numbers in ISO 3 for frequencies from 290 to 3255 Hz, using the
measurement arrangement shown in Figure 12. See Annex C.
The weighted terminal coupling loss is calculated according to ITU-T Recommendation G.122
(1993) Annex B, Section B.4 (trapezoidal rule).
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be tested at the nominal setting. For the nominal
setting, adjust the level so that the RLR is as close as possible to the nominal RLR value.
6.5.2. Requirements
The normalized value of TCLw loss shall be greater than 52 dB for IP sets and 45 dB for PCM sets
when measured under free field conditions and with SLR normalized to 8 dB and RLR normalized to
32
TIA/EIA-810-A
0 dB. It is desirable that the normalized value of TCLw for IP sets to be greater than 55 dB and that
the normalized value of TCLw for PCM sets be greater than 50 dB.
For example, if the measured TCLw is 48 dB, the measured SLR is 10 dB and the measured RLR is
2 dB, then the normalized value of TCLw = 48 dB + (8 - 10) dB + (0 - 2) dB = 44 dB.
NOTE 1: If equipped with adjustable receive level, the TCLw will decrease in proportion with the
increased gain relative to the nominal RLR in most cases. For example, if the measured
TCLw is 45 dB at nominal RLR and the adjustable receive level adds 12 dB of gain, then
TCLw (maximum receive level) = 45 dB - 12 dB = 33 dB.
NOTE 2: The echo impairment perceived by the person at the opposite end of the connection from a
telephone set is a function of the magnitude of the talker echo signal as well as the talker
echo path delay. The echo signal becomes more disturbing as the talker echo path delay
increases. Thus, a telephone set with adequate TCLw performance on low delay
connections may provide satisfactory performance while the same may not be true for
connections that have a long delay.
NOTE 3: Temporally weighted terminal coupling loss (TCLt) is an alternate method for echo
measurement, which may be more subjectively relevant, especially in devices with echo
suppression or cancellation features. (See IEEE Standard 1329-1999.) The performance
requirements may need to be changed when using this method. This issue is currently
under study.
Headset Suspended
vS E N D ( E c h o R e t u r n )
Decoder v
Digital
Interface
Set
Coder GEN
33
TIA/EIA-810-A
Additional consideration should be given to the acoustic pressure caused by tones, other audio
signals or long duration, high amplitude electrical signals applied to power, network, handset or
auxiliary leads of the digital telephone.
Apply a digital square wave to the receive input, switched between the maximum positive and the
maximum negative values (see Table 1), as defined in ITU-T Recommendation G.711. The switching
rate shall range from 1 Hz to 4000 Hz over a sweep time of not less than 30 seconds. The
measurement shall be made with a RMS detector set to 1 second effective averaging time (RMS
Slow).
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted to the maximum setting.
Maximum acoustic pressure limits can be referenced to the ERP, DRP, free field (0 degrees elevation
and azimuth) or to a diffuse field, as required by the appropriate safety standard. This may require
that measurements made at one reference point be translated to the required reference point.
For types 2, 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4 ear simulators, DRP to ERP transformation shall be performed by adding
the values in table 2b/P.57 of ITU-T Recommendation P.57 to the data measured at the DRP. For
type 3.2 ear simulators, DRP to ERP transformation shall be performed by using the transfer function
supplied by the manufacturer of the ear simulator.
Transformation to free field or diffuse field shall be made using the transfer function supplied by the
manufacturer of the ear simulator, if available. Alternatively, the transfer functions specified in ITU-
T P.58 may be used. Transfer functions with resolution of at least 1/12 octave or R40 format shall be
used if available.
Maximum acoustic pressure measurements shall be made on the same ear simulator and with the
same positioning and force as used for receive frequency response measurements. For handsets
measured on a type 3.3 or type 3.4 ear simulator, one additional measurement shall be made using a
force of 15 N. If both measurements fall below the applicable performance limit, the measurement
that most closely approaches the limit shall be taken as the final result. If one or both measurements
exceed the limit, the one that most exceeds the limit shall be taken as the final result.
6.6.3. Requirements
The requirements are currently under study.
This short duration test stresses nonlinear processes, like AGC, and doesn’t directly replace a short
duration surge. Additional consideration should be given to the peak acoustic pressure caused by
tones or short duration, high amplitude electrical pulses applied to power, network, handset or
auxiliary leads of the digital telephone.
34
TIA/EIA-810-A
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted to the maximum setting.
Peak acoustic pressure limits can be referenced to the ERP, DRP, free field (0 degrees elevation and
azimuth) or to a diffuse field, as required by the appropriate safety standard. This may require that
measurements made at one reference point be translated to the required reference point. The
translations shall be implemented using a minimum phase, parametric filter (or equivalent) as peak
measurements must be made in real time. Both the magnitude and phase of the transfer function is
necessary to best preserve the waveshape for a proper measurement of its peak value.
The filter parameters for transformation from DRP to ERP shall be based on the transfer function
specified in Section 6.6.2. The filter parameters for transformation to free field or diffuse field shall
be made using the transfer function supplied by the manufacturer of the ear simulator, if available.
Alternatively, the transfer function specified in ITU-T P.58 can be used. Transfer functions with
resolution of at least 1/12 octave or R40 format shall be used if available.
The magnitude of the filter response shall follow the transfer function within a tolerance of ±1dB.
In practice, most devices will pass peak acoustic limits without the reduction provided by the
translation filter. In these cases, the filter may not be required.
Maximum acoustic pressure measurements shall be made on the same ear simulator and with the
same positioning and force as used for receive frequency response measurements. For handsets
measured on a type 3.3 or type 3.4 ear simulator, one additional measurement shall be made using a
force of 15 N. If both measurements fall below the applicable performance limit, the measurement
that most closely approaches the limit shall be taken as the final result. If one or both measurements
exceed the limit, the one that most exceeds the limit shall be taken as the final result.
6.7.3. Requirements
The requirements are currently under study.
35
TIA/EIA-810-A
All telephones shall support G.711 A-law and mu-law. The handset technical requirements apply
only to mu-law and A-law G.711 codecs. If the telephone uses other G-Series low-bit rate vocoders,
the manufacturer must ensure that their implementation passes the standard test vectors associated
with that codec. For bit exact vocoders, such as G.729, it is important to ensure that vector testing has
been performed and found to be compliant with the associated ITU requirement.
• Encoding and decoding is assuming to be G.711 in mu-law. In particular, this applies to the
requirements in the Distortion and Noise sections.
Algorithmic processes, such as Echo Control, VAD and AGC, may influence the test results or
require test signals other than sinewaves. ITU-T Recommendation P.64 allows several types of test
signals. The test signal used should be stated. The test signal levels specified in this standard shall be
used. Test signal levels that differ from those specified in this standard may also be required.
Packet voice latency may introduce significant delay that must be accounted for by the test
equipment.
Handsfree telephones designed for other than traditional tabletop or desktop positioning should be
tested with the appropriate user positioning in mind. This position shall be defined as the
“recommended test position” (RTP). The RTP should be obtained from the manufacturer, and should
be based upon the product’s intended use. For testing purposes, this will dictate the distance and
position geometry relationship between the handsfree and the mouth simulator and microphone.
Measurements performed at other distances or positions shall be noted, and in the absence of a RTP,
the 50 cm test position as defined in IEEE 1329, is recommended.
The volume control setting resulting in nominal RLR is the reference volume control (RVC) setting
defined in IEEE 1329.
36
TIA/EIA-810-A
vS E N D
Mouth Simulator
GEN
Send
pM
Decoder v
Measuring
50 cm Interface Amplifier
30 cm
Coder
40 cm Digital
Set
Anechoic Chamber (On Table)
Reference Codec
7.1.1.2. Requirement
The send frequency response should be below the 1/3 octave band upper limit and above the 1/3
octave band lower limit defined in Table 10 and shown in Figure 14. Note: The frequency response
mask is a floating or “best fit” mask.
37
TIA/EIA-810-A
-10
-20
100 1000 10000
Frequency (Hz)
To Sound Pressure
Measuring Amplifier
Coder GEN
40 cm
Digital
Set
(On Table)
Anechoic Chamber vRCV
Reference Codec
38
TIA/EIA-810-A
7.1.2.2. Requirement
The receive frequency response should be below the 1/3 octave band upper limit and above the 1/3
octave band lower limit defined in Table 11 and shown in Figure 16. Note: The frequency response
mask is a floating or “best fit” mask.
10
Arbitrary Level (dB)
-10
-20
100 1000 10000
Frequency (Hz)
39
TIA/EIA-810-A
The handsfree SLR should be 5 dB quieter than the handset SLR due to:
Subjective evaluations have determined that the handsfree RLR should be 14 dB quieter than the
handset RLR.
7.2.1.2. Requirement
The terminal should be designed to have a nominal handsfree SLR = 13 dB, with a tolerance of ±4.0
dB.
7.2.2.2. Requirement
The terminal should be designed to have a nominal handsfree RLR = 16 dB, with a tolerance of ±4.0
dB.
40
TIA/EIA-810-A
7.3.1.3. Requirement
The handsfree send noise should be no greater than -64 dBm0p.
7.3.2.3. Requirement
The handsfree send single frequency interference should be less than -74 dBm0p.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value when driven by quiet code.
7.3.3.3. Requirement
The handsfree receive noise should be less than 40 dBA at the maximum volume control setting and
less than 35 dBA with the volume control at the nominal RLR value, with the comfort noise turned
off.
41
TIA/EIA-810-A
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value when driven quiet code.
7.3.4.3. Requirement
The handsfree receive single frequency interference should be 10 dB quieter than the A-weighted
broadband noise floor.
7.4.1.2. Requirement
The ratio of signal-to-total distortion and noise power of the digitally encoded signal output should
be above the limits given in Table 12.
42
TIA/EIA-810-A
Limits for intermediate levels are found by drawing straight lines between the breaking points in the
table on a linear (dB signal level) – linear (dB ratio) scale.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive levels shall be adjusted so that the RLR is as close as possible
to the nominal RLR value.
7.4.2.2. Requirement
The ratio of signal-to-total distortion and noise power measured with A-weighting applied, should be
above the limits given in Table 13, unless the measured sound pressure is less than –50 dBPa. The
measurement microphone may be placed at 25 cm for this measurement if the measured signal levels
are too low.
7.5.2. Requirements
The normalized value of handsfree TCLw loss should be greater than 45 dB when measured under
free field conditions and with SLR normalized to 13 dB and RLR normalized to 16 dB. It is desirable
that the normalized value of TCLw be greater than 50 dB to meet ITU-T Recommendation G.131
talker echo objective requirements.
For example, if the measured handsfree TCLw is 27 dB, the measured SLR is 16 dB and the
measured RLR is 15 dB, then the normalized value of TCLw = 27 dB + (13 - 16) dB + (16 - 15) dB
= 25 dB.
43
TIA/EIA-810-A
NOTE 1: Temporally weighted terminal coupling loss (TCLt) is an alternate method for echo
measurement, which may be more subjectively relevant, especially in devices with echo
suppression or cancellation features. (See IEEE Standard 1329-1999.) The performance
requirements may need to be changed when using this method. This issue is currently
under study.
Place the handsfree telephone in the middle of a hard, smooth surface free of any other object for
0.5 m. The telephone set shall be fully active. The surface must be at least 1 square meter.
7.6.2. Requirement
The handsfree stability loss, i.e., minimum loss, at any frequency should be greater than 6 dB. It is
desirable that this loss be greater than 10 dB.
Telephone sets with adjustable receive level should maintain stability over the entire range of
adjustable receive levels.
44
TIA/EIA-810-A
One weakness of these objective measurement algorithms is that they do not account for the
conversational nature of speech. ITU-T Recommendation G.107, the E-Model, is useful in
transmission planning for evaluating end-to-end transmission performance of both PSTN and IP
networks. The main advantages of G.107 are that it is standardized, it can handle all IP QoS
impairments associated with modern signal processing devices and it models the conversational
nature of speech.
Table 14 shows the Ie for a number of codecs in error-free conditions. This information was taken
from in ITU-T Recommendation G.113, APPENDIX I, Table I.1. Refer to the latest issue of G.113,
APPENDIX I for the currently accepted values of Ie.
These Ie values are provisional because they were determined in isolated experiments. Refer to the
latest issue of G.113, APPENDIX I for the currently accepted values of Ie.
45
TIA/EIA-810-A
Table 15 – Provisional Planning Values for Ie under Conditions of Random Packet Loss, for
Codecs G.729A + VAD, G.723.1A + VAD and GSM EFR
46
TIA/EIA-810-A
Table 16 – Provisional Planning Values for the Equipment Impairment Factor Ie under
Conditions of Packet Loss, for Codec G.711 without and with Packet Loss Concealment (PLC)
G.711 w/ PLC
Packet Loss G.711 w/o PLC Random Packet Bursty Packet Loss
% Loss
0 0 0 0
1 25 5 5
2 35 7 7
3 45 10 10
5 55 15 30
7 — 20 35
10 — 25 40
15 — 35 45
20 — 45 50
Note:
Speech packet length: 10 ms
8.3. QoS
QoS can be expressed in many ways. Table 17 is based on information in ITU-T Recommendations
G.175, Table 3/G.175 and G.109, Table 1/G.109. It shows the correlation between the E-Model’s
objective outputs (R-value, MOS, GoB% and PoW%) and the corresponding categories of speech
transmission quality and user satisfaction.
Table 17 – The Relationship between R-value and MOS, GoB% and PoW%
and the Definition of Speech Transmission Quality Categories
and User Satisfaction Levels
R-value MOS %
GoB% %
PoW% Speech User satisfaction
lower Transmission
limit Quality Category
90 4.34 97 ~0 Best Very satisfied
80 4.03 89 ~0 High Satisfied
70 3.60 73 6 Medium Some users dissatisfied
60 3.10 50 17 Low Many users dissatisfied
50 2.58 27 38 Poor Nearly all users dissatisfied
Note 1: Connections with R-values below 50 are not recommended.
Note 2: Although the trend in transmission planning is to use R-values, equations to convert R-values
into other metrics e.g. MOS, %GoB, %PoW can be found in Annex B of G.107.
It is convenient to use the R-value to categorize the user’s subjective satisfaction, because the R-
value is linear and the categories separated by decades. Using the R-value also avoids mistakes
related to comparing subjective MOS results, obtained under certain conditions, with E-Model
objective predictions. Because the E-Model is a relative tool rather than an absolute tool, all E-Model
results should always be compared to a reference condition. That is, all E-Model results should
always be compared to a reference condition. The best reference condition is often the E-Model
default setting, which represents two ideal ISDN sets connected together with zero delay.
47
TIA/EIA-810-A
The four main impairments in VoIP telephony are delay, echo, voice compression and packet loss.
Graphs of the R-value vs network delay, with the Ie of a particular codec as the parametric variable
and all other E-Model parameters at their default setting, shows the best case QoS. Figure 17 shows
the R-value vs network delay for the reference case of the G.711 codec on an ISDN connection with
no delay (and obviously no packet loss), with the G.723.1A + VAD codec (6.3 kbit/s) at various
amounts of non-bursty packet loss. The actual distribution of packet loss on IP is likely to be bursty,
but it can be modeled by short-term variation in randomly distributed rates. In some cases, the short-
term packet loss may be much greater than shown in these figures. The fixed G.723.1A + VAD delay
was removed to better show the range of one-way network delay. This means that the G.723.1A +
VAD family of curves has been shifted to the left by 98 ms. Figure 18 shows a similar graph for the
G.729A + VAD codec.
The following is a list of the assumptions that were made for this analysis:
1. all input parameters are at the Version 19 E-Model default values, except Ie and delay T
2. absolute delay Ta = mean one-way delay T
3. round-trip delay Tr = 2 x mean one-way delay T
4. echo cancellation is ideal
5. G.711 ISDN reference connection delay is zero
6. G.723.1A + VAD delay is 3 packets X number of frames/packet X frame size (ms) + look ahead
(ms) = 3 X 1 X 30 ms + 7.5 ms = 97.5 ms ≅ 98 ms, where the 3 packets are a rule-of-thumb
related to one packet being packetized, one in transient and one being depacketized.
7. G.729A +VAD delay is 3 packets X number of frames/packet X frame size (ms) + look ahead
(ms) = 3 X 2 X 10 ms + 5 ms = 65 ms.
Figure 17 shows that G.711 is in the “very satisfied” category up to about 150 ms of network delay.
There are two slopes to the curve, with the break point at about 150 ms. The slope increases after 150
ms due to additional impairment related to the difficulty of two people conversing under long delay
conditions. For example, it becomes increasingly more difficult for one person to break into the
conversation and to decide whose turn it is to speak as the one-way delay increases.
The G.723.1A + VAD codec starts out in the middle of the “some users dissatisfied” category, with
no packet loss, and the family of G.723.1A + VAD curves shows the degradation in user satisfaction
with increasing packet loss and increasing network delay. It can be seen that relatively little network
delay, in IP terms, degrades the QoS significantly.
Figure 18 shows that G.729A +VAD codec provides somewhat better user satisfaction than the
G.723.1A + VAD codec, because of its better Ie value and shorter packetization delay. However, the
QoS of both codecs is significantly degraded relative the ISDN reference condition. Since this is the
best possible performance for these codecs, it is clear that neither can be considered as a viable
alternative to the existing ISDN QoS.
48
TIA/EIA-810-A
49
TIA/EIA-810-A
Loudness ratings are used rather than simple level measurements because of better subjective
correlation. Loudness ratings more closely account for the ear’s different sensitivity at different
frequencies and its nonlinear response to varying sound levels. The following calculations are based
on the 1993 and 1999 revisions of ITU-T Recommendation P.79. Older versions of P.79 should not
be used. ITU-T P.79 provides information on the derivation of the loudness rating algorithm.
Band 17
Where:
i Frequency bands from Table 1 of ITU-T P.79-1999, bands 4-17.
SMJ Send Frequency response data (Sensitivity, Mouth-to-Junction) in dBV/Pa measured
per this standard.
Wsi Send weighting factor from Table 1 of ITU-T P.79-1999, see Table 18.
Band 17
Where:
i Frequency bands from Table 1 of ITU-T P.79-1999, bands 4-17.
SJE Receive frequency response data (Sensitivity, Junction-to-Ear) in dBPa/V measured
per this standard.
Wri Receive weighting factor from Table 1 of ITU-T P.79-1999, see Table 18.
LE Leakage correction from Table 2 of ITU-T P.79-1999, see Table 18. Only used when
handset is sealed to IEC-318 ear. Not used with Handsfree, Headsets, or when using
ear simulators with controlled leakage.
50
TIA/EIA-810-A
Band 20
Where:
i Frequency bands from Table 3 of ITU-T P.79-1999, bands 1-20.
SmeST Sidetone frequency response data (Sensitivity, mouth-to-ear) in dB Pa/Pa measured
per this standard.
WMSi Sidetone weighting factor from Table 3 of ITU-T P.79-1999, see Table 18.
Band 17
Where:
i Frequency bands from Table 1 of ITU-T P.79-1999, bands 4-17.
SMJ Send Frequency response data (Sensitivity, Mouth-to-Junction) in dBV/Pa measured
per this standard.
Wsi Send weighting factor from Table 1 of ITU-T P.79-1999, see Table 18.
Band 17
Where:
i Frequency bands from Table 1 of ITU-T P.79-1999, bands 4-17.
SJE Receive frequency response data (Sensitivity, Junction-to-Ear) in dBPa/V measured
per this standard.
Wri Receive weighting factor from Table 1 of ITU-T P.79-1999, see Table 18.
51
TIA/EIA-810-A
52
TIA/EIA-810-A
The following describes how to convert between various units of measurement used in telephone
testing.
0 dBm (0 VU) is accepted as 1mW, typically using a circuit impedance of 600 Ω or 900 Ω.
Therefore, for 0 dBm, V = 774.6 mV or 0 dBm = -2.218 dBV @ 600 Ω (use -2.2 dB)
Therefore, for 0 dBm, V = 948.7 mV or 0 dBm = -0.458 dBV @ 900 Ω (use -0.5 dB)
This means that if we substitute 600 Ω for 900 Ω or vice versa, and the voltage remains constant,
then we have:
To simplify,
Correction (dB) = 10 log( |Z1| / |Z2| ), that is, the log of the ratio of the magnitude of the impedances,
when converting from impedance Z1 to Z2.
If converting from "Z1 = 600 Ω" to "Z2 = 900 Ω", the correction factor is -1.76 dB (use -1.8 dB),
thus we subtract 1.8 dB from the measurement.
At this point, depending on the impedance being used, conversion factors can be applied dB for dB to
the measured or calculated result. As an example, to convert a 600 Ω -20dBm signal to dBV, simply
subtract 2.2 to get -22.2 dBV. Another example is if -20 dBm is measured across 600 Ω, then across
53
TIA/EIA-810-A
900 Ω, we add a correction of -1.8 dB to get -21.8 dBm (since less power is dissipated by the higher
resistance).
Conversions from the IEEE 661 methodology to the ITU-T P.79 methodology as specified by
TIA/EIA-579-A, Annex A, are as follows:
The above conversions should be used as an approximation only. These conversions are based on the
nominal frequency response curves specified in TIA/EIA-579-A. Proper conversion may depend
upon actual measurements being made with each measurement standard, when frequency responses
deviate significantly from the specified nominals.
dB Pa (dB Pascals)
dBSPL (dB Sound Pressure Level)
Where,
0 dB Pa = 94dBSPL, and 0 dBSPL = 20 microPascals, 1 Pa = 1 N/m2
54
TIA/EIA-810-A
55