Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6


July 2, 2019

President Donald J. Trump

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500


Dear Mr. President:

I respectfully preface this letter by stating it has been my intention - from the infancy stages of
the litigation (referenced below), to ultimately reach a mutual agreement with The United States,
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and all parties. Before I move forward with filing a new
complaint against The United States in the US Court of Federal Claims - I believe that there
exists an opportunity now to first have a mutual discussion to see if a resolution is possible. A
meeting would also potentially allow for discussion over legal rights to the IP/Economic
framework known as, “The Harihar FCS Model©”; and also, a better understanding of the
separate, philanthropic vision that would follow, should an agreement be reached. Therefore, as
follow-up to my last letter (delivered April 25, 2019),1 I respectfully request a formal meeting
with the Executive Office to discuss all legal issues stemming from the following Federal
1. HARIHAR v US BANK, et al – Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752, Appeal No. 17-1381
(1st Circuit) and Lower Court Docket No. 15-cv-11880;
2. HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES – Appeal No. 17-2074, Lower Court Docket No.
17-cv-11109; and

Referencing the 4-25-19 letter to President Trump, which addressed formal Judicial Treason claims evidenced
against all nine (9) Justices of the US Supreme Court – who consciously chose to rule on Certiorari Petition No. 18-
7752 AFTER jurisdiction had been lost.
3. HARIHAR v CHIEF JUDGE JEFFREY R. HOWARD, et al – Docket No. 18-cv-

The following is a summary overview of the current situation. As you know, HARIHAR v US
BANK et al has now publicly evidenced (as a matter record) judicial abuses of power at every
level of the MA State and Federal judiciary, including SCOTUS.2 Also evidenced is a failed
process for addressing judicial misconduct in the First Circuit, including the Office of the First
Circuit Executive and the Administrative Office of US Courts. Formal misconduct complaints
have been documented against fifteen (15) First Circuit Judges, including the Chief Judge –
Hon. Jeffrey R. Howard. Formal Treason claims have been brought under Article III and 18
U.S. Code § 2381 - against eleven (11) judges (9 Federal, 2 State) for continuing to rule after it
was evidenced that jurisdiction had been lost. Collectively, there has been an unprecedented
ELEVEN (11) recusals (9 Federal, 2 State) from my litigation alone. No accused judicial
officer has challenged a single claim, including treason. Even now, there appears to be a
continued pattern of corrupt conduct in the Massachusetts Superior Court (Referencing
HARIHAR v WELLS FARGO, Docket No. 1981CV00050, Middlesex County) as - eight (8)
MA State judges are considered disqualified and recent failures by the Clerk’s office indicate
that the integrity of the Court has been compromised. The EOP was recently copied on email
communications to Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA) that evidenced these failures.

In the US Supreme Court, the same, identical pattern of corrupt conduct has now been
evidenced by all nine (9) Supreme Court Justices, who as a matter of record, ruled without
jurisdiction when they denied Certiorari Petition No. 18-7752. Formal complaints (including
evidenced Treason claims) have been brought via email/social media to your direct attention, the
US Supreme Court (via email to the Deputy Clerk), members of Congress (via a formal letter
sent to the direct attention of US Senator – Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)) and to Governor
Charlie Baker (R-MA). With the assistance of social media, ALL has been evidenced in full
public view. Collectively, I have publicly evidenced a failed Judicial Branch of Government
(Federal and State). Based on these evidenced systemic failures, HARIHAR v US BANK et al

This includes ongoing litigation in the Middlesex Superior Court (MA), Docket No. 1981CV00050; the Hon.
Janice W. Howe, presiding - following the recusals of the Hon. Judge Kenneth J. Fishman and most recently the
Hon. Maureen Hogan on June 28, 2019.
is now recognized nationwide as the most egregious abuse of judicial power in US history. It
appears that collectively, the only intention of the Judicial Branch (Federal and State) has been to
ultimately arrive at a corrupt and pre-determined outcome. Any objective observer who has
thoroughly reviewed the 8-year history of this litigation would certainly agree. As an American-
born citizen of The United States, this is unacceptable.

Separately, you are aware that I have evidenced failures within the Executive Branch (Federal
and State) as both the DOJ and MA AGO are on record as saying that they will not bring
criminal indictments for related, evidenced criminal claims; and in the Legislative Branch, I
have evidenced an 8-year email/social media trail exemplifying nonfeasance by legislative
leaders in the Commonwealth, who have consciously chosen to turn a "blind eye" to these
evidenced failures. This is also RICO case, as I have evidenced (as part of the record) Collusion
between: (1) the US Attorney's Office (MA); (2) MA AGO; and (3) Attorneys for Bank
Defendants - Wells Fargo and US Bank (Referencing the West LegalEdCenter continuing
education course entitled, “After the Bubble Bursts”).

For more than four (4) years, I’ve brought ALL of these evidenced claims including judicial
Treason3 to direct attention of the EOP – first under the prior Obama Administration and then to
you directly (via email – www.whitehouse.gov ) and until recently, via social media/Twitter
(@POTUS and @realDonaldTrump ).4 It remains unclear as to WHY the prior Obama
administration failed to respond to such egregious crimes – particularly since the referenced IP
was successfully presented to multiple government offices/agencies including (but not limited
1. The EOP – specifically, per the request of former VP Joe Biden;
2. The House Financial Services Committee – presented directly to the former Deputy
Chief Counsel – Gail Laster;

As required by Federal Law, witnessed acts of Treason (ARTICLE III, Section 3) must be reported to the Court,
the Governor of your respective state or to the President of The United States. To date, formal Treason claims have
been evidenced against 11 (9 Federal, 2 MA State) judges – and separately against ALL 9 Justices of the US
Supreme Court.
Twitter has recently suspended my account - @MH_Foreclosur1, for reasons unknown, as there has been NO
violation to Twitter rules.
3. The Office of US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) – specifically, Senior Economic
Advisor, Bruno Freitas;
4. The Office of (former) US Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (D-MA);
5. The Offices of the Massachusetts and New Hampshire Attorney General; and
6. Larry Rasky - Chairman of one of the largest and most respected independent public
relations and public affairs firms in the US – Rasky Partners, Inc.

Since the Trump administration has taken office, I’ve updated the EOP for over two (2) years.
While there’s still much work to be done in resolving these legal issues, I’m appreciative that the
White House has acknowledged every one of my updates (by email), assuring me that these
issues will be brought to your attention.

Put it all together - I've now evidenced systemic failures in all three (3) branches of government
(Federal and State), showing cause – if left uncorrected, to bring a new complaint in the US
Court of Federal Claims against The United States. If there fails to be a mutual agreement with
the Federal Government - or if the Court exemplifies the same patterns of corrupt conduct, I will
have exhausted all legal remedies available to me as a US Citizen, showing cause to file a new
complaint against The United States in the ICJ (International Court of Justice, The HAGUE,

Clearly, the Nation is watching... On my LinkedIn account alone, I have over 1500 new contacts
including: (1) 20+ people from the EOP/Trump Administration; (2) Executive Producers from
ABC News, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, 60 Minutes, Inside Edition...; (3) Law Professors from
Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Stanford, Suffolk...; (4) Dozens of Attorneys/Law firms, etc...
Everyone is watching - and EVERYONE knows I'm right.

Mr. President, since the infancy stages of this litigation, my intentions have been (and remain)
1. To recoup damages suffered from my identified illegal foreclosure5; and

The referenced Property belonging to Mohan A. Harihar was identified as an illegal foreclosure by: (1) The
Department of Justice (DOJ); (2) MA Attorney General’s Office; and (3) Federal Bank Regulators.
2. To ultimately gain alignment with the State/Federal Government involving my
referenced Intellectual Property/Trade Secret, designed to deliver substantial economic
growth to the Commonwealth and to The United States (including substantial relief to
illegally foreclosed homeowners Nationwide).

It was never my intention to evidence corruption at the highest levels of government and
banking. If the law was upheld years ago, I would still be in my home and/or a mutual (and
fair) legal agreement would have likely been reached between parties. Instead however, the
evidenced failures by all three (3) branches of government bring us to where we are today. Left
uncorrected, a failed judicial system is threat to every American. If there is no agreement
between parties and the law is not upheld, it will remain my intention to continue the pursuit of
civil and criminal accountability against ALL parties – including judicial officers, regardless of
timeline. If these failures continue, it is incumbent upon the Executive and Legislative Branches
to initiate corrective action under ARTICLES II & III.

I pray that as the leader of our great Nation, this letter will not fall on deaf ears and that
ultimately, we can work together towards a legal solution that benefits both parties – while
providing a path to even greater economic growth for the Nation. As part of the potential
solution, I’m prepared to personally demonstrate the implementation of the FCS Model as a case
study and potential template for Massachusetts and beyond. Potential solutions might also
include legal agreements made with the Commonwealth and other Defendants in order to
maximize the benefit, while limiting legal risk to all parties. Both the Commonwealth and the
Defendants in the referenced litigation have similarly (in good faith) been given the opportunity
to have separate mutual agreement discussions. I think even you would agree, Mr. President, that
successful negotiations here will elevate “The Art of the Deal” to an entirely new level.

Thank you, Mr. President. I wish you and the First Family a Happy Independence Day and look
forward to your response with great anticipation.



Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)