Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 132

Analysis of TRB’s Research Needs Statements (RNS) Database for Records Related to Sustainability

The purpose of this analysis was to determine the extent to which the topic of sustainable
transportation is addressed in the proposed research projects listed in the TRB Research
Needs Statements (RNS) database (http://rns.trb.org/).

What is meant by sustainability?


While definitions of sustainability and sustainable development vary considerably, most
comprehensive definitions of sustainable development consider impacts in the three areas
of environment, economy, and society (equity), sometimes referred to as the "three Es".
Within these three broad areas, different topics in sustainability were identified (see Table
1), and for each record, the areas of sustainability which it addressed were noted (up to
three). Records were then given a "Sustainability Score" based on how well the proposed
project addresses one or more of the three Es.

Search terms:
Although there are theoretically many terms that could fall under one of the three
dimensions of sustainability, for the purposes of this research effort, terms were chosen that
were expected to garner as many records as possible while still remaining relevant to
sustainability. The terms used in the searches for this study were: economic development,
economy, environment, equity, society, sustainability, and sustainable. Where multiple
search terms pulled up the same record, this is noted in subsequent "Search Term" fields in
the "Records" tab. Obviously, there are more terms that could be used for additional
searches, including conservation, preservation, energy, safety, and others.

How records were scored:


Scoring the RNS records in terms of whether they address issues of sustainability and in
what ways was largely a subjective exercise. Using the Table 1 information, the evaluator
determined which, if any, of the listed sustainability topics was clearly addressed in the RNS
record. The record was given up to a full point in each of the three categories (Environment,
Economy and Equity); half points were given where some aspect of that sustainability
dimension was addressed. For example, a record that only discussed safety issues would
score 0.5 for its "Equity" score, whereas a record that addressed multiple societal aspects,
such as safety and access, or safety and access and intragenerational equity, was recognized
as addressing equity/society in a more comprehensive way, and so was given a full point. All
records received a score between 0 and 3 (up to 1 point in each category). It should also be
noted that in some cases, a record's research focus may have the potential to impact
sustainability beyond the category/categories indicated, but this was not explicitly discussed
in the problem description, research objective or other piece of the proposal. For example,
the record entitled "Modern Streetcars and Economic Development: The Rest of the Story"
specifically discussed streetcar research that focuses solely on economic impact, even
though streetcar promotion might also have environmental or even social impacts. For this
reason, its total score was 0.5 (awarded in the "Economy" category).
o Sustainability
Table 1: Comprehensive Definition of Sustainable Transportation
Dimension Area A sustainable transportation system…
Environment Health and minimizes activities that cause serious public
Environmental health concerns and damage to the environment;
Damage

Standards maintains high environmental quality and human


health standards throughout urban and rural
areas;

Noise minimizes the production of noise;


Land Use minimizes the use of land;
Emissions and limits emissions and waste to levels within the
Waste planet’s ability to absorb them, and does not
aggravate adverse global phenomena including
climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion,
and the spread of persistent organic pollutants;

Renewable ensures that renewable resources are managed


Resources and used in ways that do not diminish the
capacity of ecological systems to continue
providing these resources;

Non-renewable ensures that non-renewable resources are used at


Resources or below the rate of development of renewable
substitutes;
Energy is powered by renewable energy sources; and
Recycling reuses and recycles its components.
Equity/Society Access provides access to goods, resources, and services
while reducing the need to travel;
Safety operates safely; ensures the secure movement of
people and goods
Intragenerational promotes equity between societies and groups
Equity within the current generation, specifically in
relation to concerns for environmental justice; and

Intergenerational promotes equity between generations.


Equity
Economy Affordability is affordable;
Efficiency operates efficiently to support a competitive
economy; and
Social Cost ensures that users pay the full social and
environmental costs for their transportation
decisions.

Employment provides meaningful and well-paid employment


opportunities.
Project Link Date Posted
Data for Health and Transportation Planning and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=32623 9/13/2012
Programs
Management of Roadside Trees http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=32336 8/16/2012
Not all Dementias Are Alike: Implications for Driver http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=32328 8/16/2012
Safety
RoadsidePromotion
Design for Conflicts in Proximity to Bridge http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=32316 8/14/2012
Ends and Intersecting
Older Road User Evaluation Roadways
of Road Safety http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=32205 8/2/2012
Understanding Variability in Road-Based http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=31838 6/18/2012
Passengership
Uniform ScalingRates between Corridors
of Performance Measures in Order to http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=31793
for Bridge 6/11/2012
Identify
ManagementOpportunities
Systems for Improvement
Bridging the Digital Divide: Ensuring Information http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=31742 5/22/2012
Equity for Electronic
Information Communications
Clearinghouse for Utilities http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=31683 5/18/2012
Weekday Exception Scheduling in Rapid Transit Syste http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=30041 5/8/2012
Pricing Strategies for Public Transit Fares http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29859 3/26/2012
The Value of Life-Cycle Costing and Asset Management http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29855 3/23/2012
Structural Design Methods for Alternate Pipe Materialhttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29853 3/22/2012
Design and Load Rating of Culverts http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29852 3/22/2012
Hybrid Box Culvert - Using Optimized Cement-Fiber http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29387 3/13/2012
Reinforced
Modulus-based Polymer Composites
Quality Control in Culvert Backfill Insthttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29389 3/13/2012
Bedding Design for Culverts and Underground Struct http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29388 3/13/2012
Inspection Around Existing Deep Sewers and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29386 3/13/2012
Tunnels
TrenchlessforUtility
Restoration and Rehabilitation
Pipe Installation and Replacement http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29385 3/13/2012
Under
CulvertHighways
and Storm toDrain
Minimize Traffic Disruption
Management System and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29384 3/13/2012
Other Direct and Indirect Costs
Electrochemical Corrosion Repair of Concrete http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29383 3/13/2012
Culverts
Methods to Optimize Source Allocation and Field http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29367 3/8/2012
Evaluation of Construction Aggregates
Residual Capacity of Fire Damaged Surface http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29362 3/7/2012
Transportation
Acceptable HeatStructures
Affected Zone Toughness of A709 http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29365 3/7/2012
Bridge Steel
LRFD Calibration of Differential Support Settlement http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29359 3/6/2012
Water Conservation Practices for Highway http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29358 3/6/2012
Transportation Construction
Repair of Older Bridges by Welding and Road Operations http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29360 3/6/2012
and Facility Management
Estimating the Economic Value of Historic Properties http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29245 1/30/2012
for Purposes of
Comparative Mitigation
Evaluation of under Section
Alternative 106 of the http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29234
Financing 1/23/2012
National
Costs Historic
and Benefits Preservation
for Complex Act
Transportation
Sustainable Modification of Performance-Graded http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29233 1/23/2012
Projects.
Asphalts to Enhance Low-Temperature
Framework for National Pedestrian andProperties
Bicycle http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29215 1/14/2012
Performance Measures
Best Practices for Sidewalk Maintenance http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29217 1/14/2012
Data Sources to Measure Pedestrian and Bicycle http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29214 1/14/2012
Safety in Parking
Environmental Lots of Using High Carbon Fly Ash http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29205
Impacts 1/11/2012
in Structural
Influence Fill Applications
of Physical and Chemical Properties of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29206 1/11/2012
Aggregates on Mechanical and Hydraulic
Case Studies of Carrier Safety Advancement http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=29150 12/18/2011
Performance of Highway Bases
Values and Methods for Incorporating Travel Time http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28967 11/21/2011
Reliability in Highway
Safety Effects Benefit-Cost
of Roadside Mowing Analysis
Practices http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28854 10/10/2011
Maintaining Transit Effectiveness under Major http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28630 8/16/2011
Financial Constraints
Modern Streetcars and Economic Development: The http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28629 8/16/2011
Rest of theTransit
Emerging Story Markets: The Effect of Changing http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28616 8/9/2011
Demographics
Long-Term Trends andand
Lifestyle Choices
Critical Issuesin Service
Impacting http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28398 6/14/2011
Planning
Regional Transportation Systems Management &
Survey Methodologies for Motor Carrier Research http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28338 5/27/2011
Operations
Bicycle Research Needs for National Parks and Public http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28135 3/30/2011
Lands
Prediction Methodology for Cyclist Route Choice http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28137 3/30/2011
Using Revealed and Stated Preference Data
Methodology for Bicycle Network Analysis http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28124 3/24/2011
Research Program to Develop a Sustainable Decision http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27908 1/31/2011
Making
ResearchTool for Transportation
Program to Compile Life Applications Based http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27907
Cycle Inventories 1/31/2011
on
for Life
Nano Cycle Assessment
Additives Used in Asphalt and Concrete
Construction Equipment Simulators for Training Safe http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27906 1/31/2011
Construction
and Efficient Operators
Emerging Rapid Technologies for Characterizing the http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27894 1/28/2011
CrackingStructure
Remote Behavior Monitoring
of Asphalt Mix Techniques for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27870 1/24/2011
Infrastructure Applications
Effects of Pedestrian Improvements on Transit http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27843 1/13/2011
Ridership and Customer Satisfaction
Synthesis of Pedestrian Infrastructure Assessment http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27840 1/13/2011
Methods
Developing and Tools
Guidelines to Improve Pedestrian Access http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27842 1/13/2011
to Transit Stops
Best Practices for Pedestrian Facility Maintenance http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27839 1/13/2011
Improving the Safety of Mid-Block Pedestrian http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27841 1/13/2011
Crossings near Transit Stops
Crash Harm per Freight Ton-Mile for Different Large http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27486 11/23/2010
Truck
BehaviorConfigurations
and Design of Steel Bridges Strengthened http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27383 10/29/2010
with
ImprovingMaterials
FRP Travel Behavior Data for Environmental http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27379 10/27/2010
Vehicle Analyses
Transit Security Systems Lessons Learned http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27253 10/6/2010
ITS Services: Security Aspects of Data Quality http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27249 10/6/2010
Management
An Examination of Roadway Feature Identification http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27117 9/16/2010
Lighting
Developing versus Designed
Design CriteriaLighting Systems Multi- http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27113
for Cost-Effective 9/15/2010
Lane Loop Ramp Design
Developing a Methodology for Evaluating Design http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27107 9/15/2010
Tradeoffs to Accommodate Multiple Roadway Users
Effective Allocation of Available Freeway Travel Lane http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27105 9/15/2010
and Shoulder
Speed PredictionWidths
Models for Rural Multilane http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27109 9/15/2010
Highways and Urban and Suburban
Integrated Ramp and Ramp Terminal Design Arterials http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27111 9/15/2010
Developing a Basis of Evidence for Medical Advisory http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27023 8/23/2010
Board
AircraftDriver
NoiseReview
Health Effects Study http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26923 7/30/2010
Seismically Induced Earth Pressures for LRFD Seismic http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26862 7/20/2010
Design of Retaining
Ridesharing Structures to Transit
as a Complement http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26730 7/7/2010
Managed Lanes Planning and Design Guidance http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26732 7/7/2010
Development and Validation of an Optimal Stress http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26609 6/22/2010
Relief Layer forPerformance
Using Human Unbonded Concrete
Models to Overlays
Improve http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26367 6/7/2010
Railroad Safety and Performance
Identify Effective Interventions that Prevent Injuries http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26368 6/7/2010
Related
Context to Switching
Sensitive Activities
Design to Influence Operating http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26040 5/6/2010
Speeds
Analysis of Social Costs and Benefits of Advanced http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25848 4/17/2010
Biofuels and Other Low Carbon Fuels
Analysis of Synergies between Transit, Land Use, and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25878 4/17/2010
Pricing
Driving Strategies
and the Builtto Reduce Greenhouse
Environment Part II Gas http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25859 4/17/2010
Emissions
Quantify and Incorporate Environmental Benefits int http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25861 4/17/2010
Improved Modal Operating Profiles for Comparisons http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25877 4/17/2010
with Transit and Reducing the Contribution of
Understanding http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25867 4/17/2010
Landside Traffic to Greenhouse
Assessing the Impact of Leakage on the Gas (GHG) Emissions http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25852 4/17/2010
at Airports of a Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Effectiveness
Assessing Direct and Indirect Lifecycle GHG Impacts http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25845 4/17/2010
of Advancedof
Assessment Fuels
the and Vehicles
Potential for a Climate Change http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25866 4/17/2010
"Truth in Advertising" Initiative
Assessing Inter-City Passenger and for the
Inter- and Intra-Ci http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25847 4/17/2010
Transportation Sector
Carbon Footprint of Supply Chains http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25871 4/17/2010
Framework to Enable Multiple Agencies to Develop http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25843 4/17/2010
Policies
Impact of Relating
Non-CO2 Climate Change
Emissions andJet
from Infrastructure
Aircraft http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25868 4/17/2010
Protection
Assessment of Potential Emissions Reductions from L http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25854 4/17/2010
Adaptation as a Defensive Strategy to Address http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25844 4/17/2010
Climate Variability Impacts on Critical Transportation
Transformative Public Transportation Solutions for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25876 4/17/2010
Infrastructure
Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Climate http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25790 4/9/2010
Change Analysis
Collaborative in Transportation
Decision-Making Framework for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25792 4/9/2010
Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
Cap and Trade and Transportation Sector Specific http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25793 4/9/2010
Policies
Three-Dimensional Approach for Measuring http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25426 3/8/2010
Pavement Macrotexture
Investigating School Bus Driver Distraction http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25341 3/1/2010
Development of Simplified Design Guidelines for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25202 2/19/2010
Reinforced Self-Consolidating Concrete Bridge Piers
Major Cities' Adaptation to Global Climate Change http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25168 2/15/2010
Confined with CFRP Grids
Measuring Upgrades to Bus Transit http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24844 1/13/2010
Public Transit Parking: Meeting Transit Agency http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24849 1/13/2010
Policies, Community Planning Goals and
Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Transit Projects http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24846 1/13/2010
Neighborhood Concerns
Pedestrian Envrionment Improvements to Increase http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24823 1/9/2010
Transit
Methods Ridership
to Improve Physical Conditions for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24822 1/9/2010
Pedestrians Along Existing Roads
Determinants of Success: Best Practices for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24816 1/9/2010
Evaluating
Understanding Safe Users
RoutesDiverse
to School Programs
Vision Needs for Safe, http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24817 1/9/2010
Usable Transit
A Platform Systems
for the Simulation of Pedestrians http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24818 1/9/2010
Development of an All-User Detection-Based http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24820 1/9/2010
Intersection Signal System Capable of Intelligent
Automated Pedestrian Safety Analysis Using Video http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24821 1/9/2010
Traffic
Data Management
Effect of Hand-Held Communication Device Use on http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24815 1/9/2010
Pedestrian
The Effects Safety
of Vehicle Miles of Travel Pricing on http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24738 1/6/2010
Travelers in
DifferentiatingDifferent IncomeofGroups
the Benefits Congestion Pricing on http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24735 1/6/2010
both Commercial
The Effects and Non-Commercial
of Congestion Pricing on TripUsers of
Reliability http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24741 1/6/2010
Priced Facilities
Diversion to Arterials under Congestion Pricing http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24737 1/6/2010
Transitioning from High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24742 1/6/2010
to Full Facility/System
Reducing Pricing: Identify
Cracking of Concrete and Address
Bridge Piers and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24727 1/5/2010
Design
Abutmentsand Operation Issues
Pilot Program for the Implementation of Public http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=24368 11/25/2009
Involvement Tools and Techniques
Application of Data Visualization and Visual Analytics http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=23011 7/6/2009
to Freight Operations
Optimizing and Logistics
Flexible Pavement at the Sub-
Performance Based http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=22502 6/2/2009
National
on Level
Aggregate Physical Properties
Best Value Granular Materials for Pavements and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=22501 6/2/2009
Road Bases
Demonstrating A Systematic, Multi-Criteria http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=22203 5/4/2009
Approach to Deicer Selection
Winter Road Maintenance Research Roadmap http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=22202 5/4/2009
Economic Benefits of Winter Highway Maintenance http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=22201 5/4/2009
Post-Tensioning Friction Losses in Concrete Girder http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=21904 4/16/2009
Bridges
Performance Measures for Highway Stimulus http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=21833 4/14/2009
Spending and
Importance ofRelated Economic
Corporate AircraftImpacts
Manufacturing to http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=21824 4/13/2009
the
Are U.S. Economy
Roadways and Related Structures a Detriment to http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=21826 4/13/2009
Safety
Highway ApplicationsEnvironment?
in the Airport of Translucent Concrete http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=21817 4/12/2009
Techniques for Assessing the Integrity of Tunnels http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=21819 4/12/2009
Environmental Characterization of Coal Fly Ash for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=21282 3/3/2009
Use in Pavement
Performance Structures
Analysis for Section 106 Programmatic http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=21225 2/27/2009
Agreements
Effect of Accelerated Testing on the Rutting and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20928 2/12/2009
Cracking Performance of Flexible
Transit Corridor & Network Analysis Pavements http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20835 2/3/2009
Effect of Superstructure Flexibility on Bridge Deck http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20749 1/28/2009
Cracking
Problem Statement MD 1.5. Integrating Recycled http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20637 1/23/2009
Materials
Driverless into
RoadPCC Construction
Vehicles: Now or Never? http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20517 1/16/2009
Common List of Services for State DOT Information http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20466 1/13/2009
Systems
Collaboration Site for Transportation Open http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20464 1/13/2009
Architecture Community
Improving Pedestrian and Bicyclist Accessibility and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20408 1/8/2009
Safety at At-Grade Railroad Crossings
Pedestrian Signals: Visibility to Pedestrians with http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20407 1/8/2009
Varying Levels of Vision
Using Visualization to Communicate the Benefits of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20068 12/2/2008
Access
Access Management
Management to the Vicinity
in the Public of a Freeway http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=20067 12/2/2008
Interchange
Protection of Sensitive Utilities Information http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=19403 9/29/2008
Next Steps for Car-Sharing: Strategies, Challenges, http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=19046 9/8/2008
and Impacts
Improving Transit Efficiency through Evolution to a http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=19044 9/8/2008
Shared Electric-Powered
Frictional Demand Requirements Transportation Network
for Higher Friction http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=18983 9/3/2008
Evaluation of Safe Routes to School Programs http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=18724 8/18/2008
Airport Ownership Analysis for Public-Use Airports http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=18561 8/3/2008
Land Value Impacts from Aviation Easements http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=18562 8/3/2008
Model to Forecast Air Passenger Demand Across a http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=18565 8/3/2008
System of Commercial
Public Involvement Service
Related Airports (Network
to Planning for BicycleAir http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=18473 7/28/2008
Demand
and Analysis Model
Pedestrian Facilities (NADAM))
Macroeconomic Consequences of Elderly Mobility http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=18441 7/25/2008
Loss and
Transit Mitigation
Revenue andPolicy
Inventory Security Guidebook http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17799 6/10/2008
Transit Cyber Security Guidebook http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17769 6/6/2008
Analyze the Issues that Influence Widespread http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17637 5/27/2008
Deployability of Automated Transportation Systems,
Reducing Flangeway Gaps at Railroad Crossings to http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17644 5/27/2008
such
BetterasAccommodate
Human Attitudes Toward Automation and
Pedestrians
Develop
Impacts on a Comprehensive
Transportation Evaluation Framework
and Community http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17628 5/27/2008
and ToolsTruck
Develop
Development for Vehicle-Infrastructure
and Bus Cooperative Cooperative
Automation http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17638 5/27/2008
Systems
Systems that can be Deployed on Their Own Lanes
Pedestrian Visibility at a Roundabout http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17504 5/19/2008
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Sensor http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17232 4/30/2008
Technology Applications for General Aviation
Public-Private Partnerships for Increasing Capacity in http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15883 3/19/2008
Airports
Rail Corridors
Intermodal Connections for the Transportation of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15887 3/19/2008
Containers by Pneumatic Capsule
Land Use, Transportation, Pipelines
and other Issues http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15884 3/19/2008
Associated with Major Intermodal
Consolidating Freight Movement Origins and Cargo Hubs in http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15886 3/19/2008
Metropolitan
Destinations Areas
at Inland Distribution Centers
Early Integration of Technology Transfer into the http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15604 3/11/2008
Research ProcessBehavior of Different Types of
Gap Acceptance http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15595 3/6/2008
Drivers
Effect of Advanced Technologies on Traffic Flow http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15589 3/6/2008
Pedestrian Signals: Visibility to Pedestrians with http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15575 3/5/2008
Varying Levels of Vision
The Other Side of Coordination What Are the http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15379 2/12/2008
Barriers and Why Are They There?
Maximizing Benefits and Addressing Challenges of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15380 2/12/2008
Volunteer
GHG InventoryDriverasTransportation ProgramsProgram
Part of a Sustainability http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15235 1/14/2008
INM and EDMS Model Validation and Verification http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15234 1/14/2008
Integrating Safety into Regional Capital http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15226 1/11/2008
Improvement Programming
Rate of Degradation of High Processes: Best
Strength Galvanized http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15213 1/8/2008
Practices
Usedand
WireEffect Recommended
in Vertical
Cable Supported Procedures
Bridgeson Column
The of Ground Motion http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15214 1/8/2008
(Deterioration
Shear Capacity Rates of Wires)
Standards and Specifications for Utility Data http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15184 1/1/2008
Submissions
Estimating Density of Rail Use in Planning for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14892 10/26/2007
Intercity
Evaluation Rail
ofNetworks
Alcohol Education Media and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14753 10/4/2007
Enforcement ProgramsEngineering
Prototyping Roadway in Neighborhoods with High
Improvements to http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14749 10/4/2007
Concentrations
Reduce Drunk of DWICrashes
Driving Offenders
Integrated Assessment of Freight Data Needs for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14700 9/26/2007
Management
Creating a Demand and Policy Decisions
for Road Safety Education http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14473 9/4/2007
The Economic Impact of Transportation Systems on http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14405 8/28/2007
Gateway Communities
Best Practices in Working with Retail Outlets for the http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14383 8/27/2007
Sale of Transit
Parking for Public FareTransit
Media http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14384 8/27/2007
The Interface of Smart Cards and Transit Benefits http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14385 8/27/2007
Potential Travel Responses to Alternative Highway http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14292 8/16/2007
Pricing and Financing Systems and the Impact of
Fuel Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Alternative Fuels, Multimodal Freight Transportation http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14300 8/16/2007
Access/Efficiency and Infrastructure
Analyzing the Sustainability of Various Investment
Alternative http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14290 8/16/2007
Needs
Fuels and Advanced Technology Vehicles in Selected
Fuel Economy and Global Warming: Understanding http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14295 8/16/2007
Niche Vehicle Markets
Consumer
Analysis of Behavior
Alternatives andtothe Increasing
CAFE Awareness
for Increasing Fleet http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14289 8/16/2007
of the
Fuel Link
Economy Between Fuel Consumption and Global
Evaluating
Warning and Predicting the Effects of Vibration http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14299 8/16/2007
from Construction
Policy and Use ofvs.
Sensitivity: Trip-Based Transportation
Tour- and Activity- http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14266 8/15/2007
Structures
Based Modelson Buried Archaeological Deposits.
Quantifying the Costs and Benefits of Red Light http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14269 8/15/2007
Camera Enforcement
Identifying and Using Existing Data Sources to http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14260 8/15/2007
Support
Develop the Use of Other
a Framework andor Less Traditional
Methodology for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14257 8/15/2007
Performance
Incorporating Measures
Environmental Factors into
Evolving Role of "Mega-Regions" in Statewide http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14286 8/15/2007
Performance
Transportation Management
Planning Programs
Best Practices on TDM Applications in Regional http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14282 8/15/2007
Long-Range Plans, Land Use Plans/Smart Growth
Performance Measurement and Evaluation of Tolling http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14259 8/15/2007
and
NewCongestion
StakeholderPricing Project
Outreach Benefits
Emphasis in and System http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14287
Statewide 8/15/2007
Impacts
Transportation Planning
Integrating Risk Management into Performance http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14258 8/15/2007
Measurement for Decision Making
Public Private Partnerships-How Do We Evaluate the http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14214 8/14/2007
Deal?
Motorists Perceptions of Bicyclists on Roadways http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14217 8/14/2007
Road Pricing Concepts and Projects: Educating & http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14200 8/14/2007
Informing User Groups & The
Successful Strategic Planning PracticesPublic http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14220 8/14/2007
Survey Design for Activity-Based and Tour-Based http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14197 8/14/2007
(ABTB) Model Calibration
Assessment of Opportunities to Integrate and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14247 8/14/2007
SupplementofSafety
Evaluation and Security
the Potential Measures
Benefits for
of Electronic http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14249 8/14/2007
Hazardous
Shipping Materials
Papers for Transportation
Hazardous Materials Shipments
Marketing, Communications and Funding - http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14229 8/14/2007
Quantifying and
Governing by Network Articulating the Benefits/Costs of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14210 8/14/2007
Making/Deferring Transportation Investments
National Highway System Connector Roads to http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14206 8/14/2007
Airports: Condition and Needs
A Synthesis of Construction Vibration and Potential http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14205 8/14/2007
Effects
CSS andtoSustainability
Historic Buildings Adjacent to
in Transportation http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14153 8/12/2007
Transportation Projects
Improving Transit and Transportation Agency http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14175 8/12/2007
Coordination to Increase the Safety of Mid-Block
Determining Factors that Increase Crashes, Injuries, http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14164 8/12/2007
Pedestrian
and PerceivedCrossings
Risk atnear Transit
Midblock Stops
Locations
Benefits of Community Involvement to Project http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14156 8/12/2007
Delivery
Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflicts Near Schools http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14173 8/12/2007
Increasing the Safety of Interactions between http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14176 8/12/2007
Pedestrians and Large Commercial
Guidelines for Establishing, Sustaining and Vehicles in Urban http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14159 8/12/2007
Areas
Evaluating Inter-Disciplinary Teams
Information Dissemination about the Economic http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14147 8/11/2007
Development
Analytic Methods Consequences
for Evaluatingof Transportation
the Economic http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14145 8/11/2007
Investments
Development Consequences of New Technologies
Data for Evaluating Economic Development http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14146 8/11/2007
and Innovationsof Transportation Investments
Consequences
Costs and Benefits of Pavement Management Data http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14144 8/11/2007
Collection
Movements of Imported Goods within the United http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14118 8/9/2007
States
Assessment of Freight Needs in Urban http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14115 8/9/2007
Transportation
Investigating the Planning
Disaggregate Travel Behavior http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14112 8/8/2007
Effects of the Built Environment
Parking Strategies to Reduce Environmental Impacts http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14113 8/8/2007
and Improveof
Implications Place
Habit Formation and Retention, and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14108 8/8/2007
Perception of
Develop Guidelinesthe Built
for Environment on Time Use,of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14043
Design and Construction 8/6/2007
Travel Choice,
Ultra-Thin and
HMA OverlaysLocation
Economic Impact of Transportation on People and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14036 8/5/2007
Communities
Long-Term Transportation System Impacts on http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14035 8/5/2007
Communities
Climate Change, Displacement, and EJ Populations http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14034 8/5/2007
Synthesis Report of BESTUFS (Best Urban Freight http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13958 8/1/2007
Systems)
The EconomicResearch
Impact of Public Lands Transportation http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13930 7/30/2007
Systems on Gateway Communities
Controlling Air Emissions At Marine Port Terminal http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13903 7/30/2007
Operations
Costs and Financing of Transportation Security: http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13919 7/30/2007
National Policy and Planning Roadmap
Marine Environmental Windows: Beyond Process to http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13898 7/30/2007
Performance
Improving the Adoption of Ballast Water Treatment http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13901 7/30/2007
Systems
Catastrophic Transportation Emergency http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13920 7/30/2007
Management Guidebook
Development of Infrastructure Protection Training http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13914 7/30/2007
Standards and Implementation
Applying Multimodal StrategyAnalysis
LOS to Areawide http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13887 7/29/2007
Freight Impact on Highway Capacity and Level of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13890 7/29/2007
Service
Moving for UrbanOver
America Conditions
the Road -- Trucking's Impact http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13889 7/29/2007
on Highway Intersection
Multimodal Capacity andLevel LevelofofService
Service http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13888 7/29/2007
Performance Measures for Societal Goals http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13873 7/27/2007
Innovative Applications of Sustainability http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13868 7/27/2007
Performance Measures for Transit
Transit Route Management by Demand Planning http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13872 7/27/2007
Transit Corridor & Network Analysis http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13869 7/27/2007
Impact of Land Use and Zoning on Urban Goods http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13867 7/27/2007
Movement
Impact of Poverty on Children's Access to Activities http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13858 7/26/2007
Inventory and Assessment of Transit Willingness-to- http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13844 7/23/2007
pay
The in National Parks
Development and Public for
of 'Guidance' Lands
the Use of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13829 7/23/2007
Visualization within the Transportation
Role of Network Attributes on Telecommuting Planning http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13817 7/20/2007
Process
Determining The Economic Value of Roadway Access http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13779 7/19/2007
Management
Case Studies of Model City/County Ordinances that http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13743 7/18/2007
Support a Vibrant Pedestrian
Security/Hardening NetworkManagement http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13741
of Transportation 7/18/2007
Systems
Quantifying the Air Quality Impacts of Implementing http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13726 7/17/2007
Access Management
Crash Walls vs. Guard Rails in Urban Transit Projects http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13724 7/16/2007
Guidelines for Developing Performance-Based, http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13723 7/16/2007
Transit Track Safety Criteria
Establishing Equity Measures for Environmental http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13633 6/27/2007
Justice
EconomicCost-Benefit Analyses
Viability and Community Impact http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13632 6/27/2007
Assessments in Transportation Decision
Assessing the Impact of New Transportation Making http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13631 6/27/2007
Investments and Emerging
Real-Time Transfer Transportation
of Information to the Customer http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13579 6/20/2007
Technologies on Traditionally Underserved Groups
Geographic Information System Cost/Benefit http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13581 6/20/2007
Analysis Template
Analysis of Property Value Impacts of Transportation http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13543 6/15/2007
Projects
Distribution of the Value of Travel Time Savings http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13545 6/15/2007
Cost of Alternative Finance Systems http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13546 6/15/2007
Predicting Soil Loss on Highway Systems Based on a http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13539 6/15/2007
Revised
Economic Universal
value ofSoil
TDM Loss Equation
impacts (RUSLE) Specific http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13470
to community 6/3/2007
to Highway
development; Site Conditions
role of
Multimodal Design toTDM
Createin "Complete
communityStreets"
vitality and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13441 6/1/2007
regeneration
Operational and Safety Impacts of Angle versus http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13459 6/1/2007
Parallel versus Back-in Parking
Wheelchairs Crossing Flangeway Gaps at Railroad http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13462 6/1/2007
Crossings and Safety Impacts of Four- and Six-
Operational http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13448 6/1/2007
Lane Sections with Raised Medians Versus
Vehicle-Highway Automation - Policy Implications Two-Way http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13423 5/24/2007
Left Turn Lanes
Automated Vehicle Guidance for Mobility Services http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13421 5/24/2007
Saturation Flow Rate Model Verification and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13424 5/24/2007
Validation
Uncertainty Assessment of the FAA Environmental http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13336 5/11/2007
Assessment Tools
Development (AEDT and
of Aircraft and Airport
APMT) Hazardous Air http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13333 5/11/2007
Pollutant Assessment Guidelines
Identification of Improvements in Environmental http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13335 5/11/2007
Review and Compliance Processes
Development of Airspace Analysis Tool for Airport http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13143 4/9/2007
Planning
Guidelines for Using Environment-Friendly Concrete http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13102 3/21/2007
(EFC) in Transportation Infrastructure
Implementation of the Use of New Materials into http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13016 3/21/2007
Highway Construction Practice, including sustainable
Economics of Modern Timber Bridges in the United http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13045 3/21/2007
materials
States
Remediation of Highway Rights-of-Way http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13004 3/21/2007
Design and Effects of Variable Bedding Thicknesses http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13010 3/21/2007
for Precast Concrete
Establishing Pipe and BoxCriteria
Performance-Based Sections
for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13099 3/21/2007
Concrete Pavements
Validation and Implementation of Surface Fatigue http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13089 3/21/2007
Cracking Mechanism for Both
Update OC Curve Analysis Program Mixture and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13041 3/21/2007
Structural Design
Use of Field-Measured Soil Stiffness in Culvert http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13011 3/21/2007
Backfill Installation
Reliability of Metal Quality Control
Loss & Service-Life Estimates for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13003 3/21/2007
Metal-Tensioned
Development of Tools Systems in Geotechnical
for "First Cut" Evaluation of http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13000 3/21/2007
Applications
Carbonate Aggregate Durability
Use of 4D-CAD for Planning, Designing, and http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12994 3/21/2007
Constructing Transportation Projects
Performance Measurement for Evaluating http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12773 1/10/2007
Stakeholder Satisfaction with Context Sensitive
Tools to Identify and Define Project and Regional http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12772 1/10/2007
Design & Solutions
Context
Development of National Service Level Criteria for http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12750 1/9/2007
the Interstate
Effect of Solar and National
Loading Highway System
and Radiational Cooling on http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12766 1/9/2007
Pavement Surface Temperature
Research Program to Establish Environmental Best M http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12749 1/9/2007
Modelling the Evolution of Reinforcing Steel http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12760 1/9/2007
Corrosion and Concrete Structure
Simple Bridge Security Inspection Deterioration as http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12756 1/9/2007
Affected by Chloride Ingress
Bridge Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Synthesis of Practice http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12754 1/9/2007
Early and Continuous Scoping and Stakeholder Invol http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12725 12/29/2006
Guidelines for the Development of Bioretention Sto http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12720 12/29/2006
Remediation of Areas Treated with Residual Herbicid http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12727 12/29/2006
Performance Measurement for Evaluating Stakeholderhttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12719 12/29/2006
Tools to Identify and Define Project and Regional Con http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12718 12/29/2006
Guidelines for Sustainable Use of Unconventional Fillshttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12612 12/28/2006
Optimizing Aggregate Blends in Concrete Pavements http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12594 12/28/2006
for Improved
Long-Term Performance
Performance of Rockfall Mitigation Systemshttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12590 12/28/2006
Multimodal Design to Create Complete Streets http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12642 12/28/2006
Accommodating Bicycles on Rural Highways http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12661 12/28/2006
Distribution Factors for Design of Bridge Girder with http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12700 12/28/2006
FRP Decks
Environmental Impact of Coal Fly Ash in Road Construhttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12636 12/28/2006
Operational and Safety Impacts of Angle versus Parallhttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12662 12/28/2006
Development of Design Provisions for and Extending thttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12678 12/28/2006
A Decision Support System for FRP Laminate Strengthe http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12701 12/28/2006
Rapid Construction of Pre-Fabricated Substructure Sy http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12698 12/28/2006
See-Ahead Technologies for Directional Drilling http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12669 12/28/2006
Operational and Safety Impacts of Four- and Six-Lan http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12652 12/28/2006
Safety and Operational Tradeoffs of Freeway Lane an http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12650 12/28/2006
Ramp Design as a System http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12649 12/28/2006
Transition Zones Design from High-Speed to Low-Speehttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12648 12/28/2006
Investigation of Alternative Geometric Design Highwahttp://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12643 12/28/2006
Guidelines for Design and Construction of Curved Pr http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12683 12/28/2006
Performance of Laterally Loaded Drilled Shafts in Roc http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12621 12/28/2006
Undefined Effects of Rough Airfield Pavements on Air http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12517 12/15/2006
Managing Environmental Impacts of Erosion And http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12511 12/15/2006
Sedimentation From Local Rural Roads in the
Federal Aid Program Due to New Agricultural,
Mining and Logging Economies
Description Sponsoring Committee Search Term Search Term
Research problem statement ADD20, Social and Environment Sustainability
Transportation
RESEARCH PROBLEM STATEMENT agencies are facing an Economic Factors of
AFB20, Roadside Safety Society Environment
increasing need to include public health Transportation Design Safe Mobility of
Iconcerns PROBLEM in their transportation decision- ANB60, Society
Statistics
How do show
different that forms fromof2007 cognitive through Older Persons
RESEARCH
making
2009 there andPROBLEM planning.
were over STATEMENT
This need
11,400 fatalities AFB20, Roadside Safety Environment
impairment
manifests A general itself impact
problem in critical
that
several occurs driving
areas at
of skills? Design
many
the
Problem
that
What resulted
intervention from crashes strategies into are needed ANB60, Safe Mobility of
trees. Environment
existing
National
(Source: Ahighway
Environmental
substantial
Fatal Analysis bridge increase locations
Policyin
Reporting Act both System, the Older Persons
RESEARCH
to
throughout
process, and better inform
MPO PROBLEM
the and helping
United STATEMENT
StateStates professions,
DOT longis where range the AP025(2), Public Environment
number
NHTSA).
The
licensing Summary These
authorities, proportion
of crashes
TCRP in
accounted
Synthesis
individuals, total 98,
and for half Transportation Planning
Background
required
plans
population
of theand fixed length
atof the
object older of projectneedadults
fatalities for
designis guardrail
andexpected level.
nearly that
Yet,for AHD35, Bridge Environment
Ridesharing
family
Transportation
is
the required
various members at asbridge
health aasset Complement
regarding management
ends
analyses awareness
cannotare togenerally
Transit
be uses of and Development Research
Management
SCOPE:
most
20%
(page
variation ofdeveloped
4)allconcludes
inroadway impairments countries.departure
with byAto
the mainfatalities.
following
dementia pointTo AP030, Needs Public Equity
data
installed
not
of
reduce and
required
consideration the objective
due of
numbers to transportation
conflicts
for analysis
road
ofunlikely within
peopledesigners improve
the and
agencies
being killed Transportation Marketing Sustainability
The
statement:
type?
decision
existing amount
How making,
Right-of It
mightof is utility-related
highly
–Waystrategies
with the
(R/W) to
objective resources
that
promote
limits. transit
of
The AFB70, Utilities
and
Transit
road
on the in most
safety agencies
nation’s cases
engineers are
highways, the needed
increasingly
is the itassistresulting
is tools
critical using and rise and Fare Policy
and
can
safe
I.
providing
conflicts
data
literature
absorb
mobility
Research
are may
not the the available
differ anticipated
Problem
required
consist
readily by of to
dementia
Statement
level
accessible an growth
of
existing utility
service
or type?
known in that in AP065, Rail Transit Systems Environment
electronic
in
guidelines
stakeholders
vehicles
Over the thenumber that
pastforms
be in and
developed of
performing
isdecade,
predicted customer
proportion which
over
transportation their of
the older
consider
dutiesnext and
Weekday
the
intersecting
to
I. themost
Research exception
cost
transportation private effective
Problem scheduling
driveway, manner.
agencies.
Statement state inAsset
The rail or local
communication,
road
the
continues
decade.
aging
transit riskusers, posed towho,
Ridesharing
researchers
services by
increase. can
including
given
these
have needs
potentially
their
objects
However,
increased social
tophysical be somedia
provide there
given
ourthat is AP030, Public TransportationEquity
management
roadway
reasons
Fare
channels
vulnerability policy forintersection
and isthisand systems
one
mobile vary; of the
limitations or
butare other
most
applications tools
suffice in to
objects
effective
terms it quantify
to say
that that
this
I.
currently
serious
understanding
better
relevant
do
that not
riskservice
RESEARCH
the
can
allow no be
consideration
performance
need
PROBLEM
information
the to
to ofmanaged Alzheimer’s
customers
placement
consider as
measures,
appropriately.
STATEMENT
aclearinghouse
solution
public ofdisease
by matching
the and
health in of and In ABE10, Revenue and FinanceEquity
into
Society
tools
provide
perceptual,
areas
that
partnership available
where
allows real-time cognitive,
trees to
practitioners
with public
information
are
public and
presenttransit
to
transit psychomotor
easily andagencies
along
if rider the
it
III.
transit
forecast
required
transportation impact
RESEARCH supply on
future
guardrail critical
PROBLEM
to ridership
outcomes
plans driving
length and of skills
STATEMENT
demand
as
programs they
need. (1,are 2,
more
Itis 3,
isonnot AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliEquity Environment
influence
alerts.
performance,
roadside,
While
exchange
congestion, itThese
is revenue
aor process
paramount new
would
otherwise
pollution, and
forms be
isreduce ridership
needed
to
and of
more
invest
access emissions likely
to
aon levels.
wide to array
are
4).
precisely,
affected
unusual
the
III.RESEARCH While
rise by
at some
while
nationally. agency
some PROBLEMnoted
also policies,
existing attention bridge
STATEMENT operating
resource has
sites beento AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliEquity Environment
Often,
communication
have
determine
infrastructure
of
to however,
problems
utility-related
be tamed the in inlevel
the their
inprovidedriving
order
resources. effectiveness
ofsystems.
future.[1] risk
to benefits
and to6),
maintain For asmuch
the to is
transit
motorist.
example,
paid
The
costs
levels,
have to
AASHTO
of
10 other
and urban
feet exogenous
or dementias
LRFD transit
less Bridge
between factors.(5,Design the Specifically,
end less
of
limited
properties
pedestrians
When
RESEARCH
economic
if an agency because
considering and (Staplin
PROBLEM
competitiveness,
wishes of
their inflexible
the customers,
et
tothose al,
placement
STATEMENT:
learn 2001), fare
traditional
how butandof
much Some to
new AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliSustainable Equity
is
Specification
treating
Owners
the
relationships
Much knownbridge effort about
Fridays
of and has use
transportation how
(and
the
toprocess
the
beendifferent perhaps
conflict.
existing
focused dementias
load
infrastructure
body also
on and of
load
structures
questions
adapt
trees
of
funding
detail
It isthe a other
important remain
(self-regulate)
similar
greatest
mechanisms agencies lack
concrete
for aboutof
transit formarket
their should
require whether
behavior
innovations
surface
to lead onorientation.
be these
permit
the today AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliEquity
way
impact
III.
resistance
Mondays)
are
knowledge
rating
Innovative RESEARCH
expectedof critical
bridgesfactors
differently
pricing to driving
PROBLEMsatisfy
forfor skills
the
from
vehicular
strategies anew STATEMENT
design
wide in
other may ways
range
loads. of
weekdays
help other
pipes
of Environment
channels
accordingly.
considered.
are
transportation
forms
towards
than focused
the for a can
utility
future
impacts To
on bridge
User-centered
that
creating
facilities end
installations,
where
observed the – adigital
better roadway
primarily
growth in mixes.
the divide,
personsin search the
travelHybrid or
gas
made
offers
stakeholder
The
RESEARCH
However,
balance
the from
interesting
traditional
perceived most
multiple different
expectations
PROBLEM gap methods
bridge policy
betweenmaterials.
possibilities.
STATEMENT
design forpeople
for
objectives, isbyAs Seemingly,
performance
treating focused such
whothese as AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliEquity Environment
design
understanding
Box
tax
can
demand
with
Historically,
this – Culvert
be have and
time
Alzheimer’s
practice does notroad
project
consuming,
there not
results is improvements
increased needed is initiated
automatically
disease.
has in been of
in
and
different highway
the critical
aandisconnect should
same interest
mean
factors rate of
commuters
outcomes.
situations
Safety
on
revenue
have
accommodate the is
gross
access a
and good trend
Under
have totruck
ridership included
example
technology
older towards
limited
weight,
road targets,using
of more
funding,
while
and
users, aarea
demand
those flexible
short
the
the thesewhere
who
III.RESEARCH
characteristics
in
as
information
growth
between
safety sustainable
thescheduling,
transportation
insoil
between private can PROBLEM
which
development
propertiesbe
designs missed.
automobile STATEMENT
experience
investment
ofused the and
Many numbers.
in new
culvert
concrete, higher AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliEquity
aneeds, Environment
work
expectations
radius
The
people
response
management,
do
fastest not. guardrail
thicknesshave
growing of may
typical
been of
and systemtelecommuting
conflict
bedding
populationaligning
culverts
social that with
under
equity isrelocates
health
group, each
driven buriedand
by other.
by the
proportion
environment
and
stakeholders
However,
III. are
RESEARCH quickly
in of the motor-vehicle
regulations
would losing
current
PROBLEM benefittheir on
climate
STATEMENT tree
waste
ability
greatly of crashes,
to from
high fund a
II.
design
metal
arrangements,
For
barrier
pipes
transportation
the
considerations.
addressing
With
such
disposal.
the
national
OBJECTIVE
example,
is
response
the
that
and
andaround
often
transportation age
trees
compaction
plastic
their
Supplementary
clearinghouse to
of and
achieving
set the
data.
a
may
pipes
at 4½-day
conflict,
single
information
highway "standard"
For
be that
system.
acontrol
involved.
higher
axle
example, weeks,
structures
planted using
Cementitious
The and
needs,
stores
methods
with
result
In
safety
values,a
oftengaps
and
some
shorter
under
an is aa AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliEquity Environment
energy
used
instances,
between
objective
RESEARCH in prices
the maythe
midweek field.
PROBLEM and
apparent
require budget
Culvert
and safety
Friday
drawing
STATEMENT shortfalls
design is
factors
ridership
resources this
typically is
guardrail
without
research
single
limitations
freeway
acceptable
Materials
widening
organizes
often
Trenchless
The
based
appear
have
wheel.
seen toand
objectives
on
widened.
section
regard
groups
gap and
(SCM) trunk
lateral
utility-related
as
implicit
range
tosuch
Research
between
an
construction are
that
cost
capabilities—and
and highways
offset
impossible
from or
does
as
Fibers
twofold:
or
explicit
is SafeTREC
isor
expenditures
roughlyresources.
not
engineering
needed
the are approaching
maintained
dream.
1)
meet
part
process
Document
assumptions
1.2
to
in
to
atAof the
UC
and
5.0. in AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliEquity
the
of
Environment
away
required
requirements.
Berkeley
evaluate
Faced
RESEARCH
addition,
50
their years, from
with
existing length
the
have
their
there capacity
fare
PROBLEMimpact of
Most
created
revenue
perception
issimilarities
locations ato projects,
need,
need concerns,
of STATEMENT using
GIS-based
truck shortfalls
to
without of thus
loads
risk.
inspect a with crash having
crashon
andand the a AFF70, Culverts and HydrauliEquity Environment
picture,
revenues.
critical
Meanwhile,
installing
evidence
about
This is the
a redirecting
first and
of There
historic step
it
the
deformational is
replacing have
is
often
practice industrial
been
prepare
pointed
underground many
and
properties
that abyproducts
may outplan efforts
that
or for
of may the
negative
A
attenuator,
regards
databases
culvert
declining
Two
Recent
repair
compromising great recent deal
to
work effect
population
household
Ajustified
these critical of
relocation
bedding,
thatTCRPwith
systems. on
guidance
include mobility.
andrelate
synthesis
highway
motorist Kennedy of
income to has
the
layers to Efforts
evaluate
safety
safety. Space been
conflict
the
of
levels
studies minimum
health
issue to
the or
transit
Center, is the AFP70, Mineral Aggregates Sustainable
from
to
developing
I.
there
infrastructure
differences
soil
not
Exception bridge
Problem
under
be landfills
is this
significant
and and
across
schedules and
funding
without
around
by supplying
operating underused
dementias
the gap
open-cut
the
loads,
neither using
this concrete
culvert. related
known
were direct
information
capacity The
nor with
to in
are Economy
analyze
developed
leaving
thickness,
data
loand
agencies
touched
FL,
potential has (e.g.,
and the
the are
upon
demonstrated on tradeoffs
end
firmness,
resistance
areas
discrepancy culvert
looking
this of where bridge
and
issue. among
durability,
factor
for thata
between thebarrier
high
ways
Report performance
aggregate
design
reinforced inspection
proportion
to the improve
91, (LRFR)Use
greatest
user
clearinghouse.
the
excavation.
Young’s
strength
unusual;
I. charges
empty
impact
Research durability,
moduli
of
transitseats
onThe
the
Problemor increasing
The
use
critical
are
pipeof
operators strength,
plan
private
of
the driving
materials
Statementprincipal taxes,
should
technology ran and
vehicles,skills;
and
full which
answer
soil like
and 2) AFF10, General Structures Environment
measures
procedures,
unprotected.
size.
of
procedures
the
and
concrete
“objective”
These
It isstudentsInstructures,
current
effectiveness
Deployment
not the can are and
are
for
risk
intent made
beSince thatrating
specifications,
rating
eligibleof
of
strengthened
located
of difficult
most
their
Mobile
isthis systems.
culverts
for
attributedtypical
fare by
reduced-price
Device
beneath
project the the
addressing
policies.
while This
Test
to theprovelevel
performance.
can
questions
Construction
particularly
pipe
Increase
parameters.
installed
Saturday
Fire, be directly
jacking,
although such
awareness
backfill
lunchtime during leveraged.
as:
aggregates
micro-tunneling,
However,
an soils which
peakof
infrequent those
during
involved.
rush-hours makeHowever,
organizations
travel load, up
times
horizontal
similarities
in more
the when
dissimilar
information
3
specified
school
the
Many
I.
Technology
corrosive
roadways
roadbeds,
that (TL-3)
loading
RESEARCH
inclusion tangent
lunch),
have measurement
bedding
(road has
conditions
adopted
chloridesfor
sometimes with
PROBLEM
of been
or
Real-Time
sections,
trees flared
thickness
safe
are used
private
at systems
isspecific
routes
STATEMENT
removed by
guardrail
Transit
road
great
the is
sector
right often
to
sites)
depths, used;
by thingend
culverts.
school the
using
by for
or AFH70, Fabrication and InspeSociety
will
among
should
than
congestion
directional
and
construction,
interwar
constitutes
example,
departments 80 all
be
differencespercent
era, different
involved,
is
drilling,at
there
while
aprofessionals’
condition severe
of andof
its options
how
the
worst
guided
is
transportationtheir
have
private
load total
often to
levels.
not that
getaggregates
boring,
implications
bus
which been
measured can
started,
companies,
as can pipe
well bein for
as
treatment
same,
data
The
models,
Research
Information,
electrochemical
road
require
wrong
Name regardless
structural
and
safety that
thing
aresearchcrash
such
must
design systems asresponse
briefly
they
to do. of
information.
be price
repair
and
challenge, are
the
performed
addressed
There normally
fill
of
differentiation
treatments.
surrounding height.
a
tools
is
and aculvert
Another
to the
need and
there around
establishDesigns
isand
Such
is a a AFF10, General Structures Economy
the
for
used
RESEARCH
what
market,
bursting,
safety
available
Load
airlines,
compromise
terms
local to
should
factor
of
agencies bridge
and
andand PROBLEM
practical
element be
are
evaluations
freight
the the
pipe
to the
andused gap,
splitting
methods
integrity mainly
practice.
railroads
condition
estimate indirect
STATEMENT
implementation
need of hasfor for
The
toroad
operate
awithin
states
service leveraging
road
measuring
account and
life
37
are
safety
controlled
revenue
the
question
treatment
“subjective”
materials
guidance
concrete
through
timeline,
base,
For
significantly
following
soil
for
RESEARCH
exceptions
–most50
acceptable
this
feet
data
riprap,
modulus
current
often
ofbe
for
mix
Public
how
problem
by
management
uses
research
day
in
source, the
information
risk length,
inspectedbased
limits
low
decision-makers
with
much
cement
increased
PROBLEM
today. and Private interaction
Crash
attributed
SCMs
statement it
on
of
voltages
activities
confirming
inspectionSystematic
there
(yield
will
concrete,
intheir
STATEMENT
minimum
heat
andOutcome
equity,
from
Partnerships by
cost,
recent
is
the
are
controls,
of
the
typically
affected
(<40 to
Fibers andthe
defined
anduse
concept
years,V)
design
Data
Water inand
culvert
to
users.
the
that
(PPP)
what zone aas
of
is ADC60, Waste Management Sustainable
transportation
health
level
problem
bedding
Evaluation
with
management)
(HAZ)
“providing
extract
Such
structure
analyzing of
the index,
deterioration
toughnesswith
thickness,
surrounding
chlorides
discrepancies System
real-time
itself.
the whilestructure.
fitting
strategies
risk for
from
Through safety
canthe
which
(CODES),
all
associated of
soil.
the Fire
end
to
welding
information
reveal
theis
usually
Somebe in
concrete withcanterms
culvert
treatment
goes better
how
years, relate
load
a
processes
by step of
is
able
while
well
asis of to and
can
has
Geotechnical
strategies
asphalt.
road-based
driven
envisioned:
assumptions.
deflection
asignificantly
consideration solve
received
precious by As it.
should
the theRecent
testing,
finite special
alter designers
passengership
need
Commonly,
of be
transportation
resource to
etc.research
day-of-week
the attention,
put need
install
mechanicalin soil
Effective
in place
is new
theevaluated
particularly
absolute
introduced.
density
scheduling topipe
means
United
and ensure
accident
infrastructure.
systems
further
carried
Research
to
currently
means
simultaneously
roadway
groundwater
placement worst-case
respond
behavior by
ofand rate
and the
Problem
allowed
at to least
infrastructure and
guardrail
scenario
links In
culvert
changes
has
ofrehabilitate
roadside mobility
addition,
police-reported
by
two
inserting Statement
the
infiltrated transitions
with
andinis
trees is
demand.a
AASHTO/AWS
dissemination
positively
understood,
thein
regards
some number
and termsby to
crash
joints,
the to the
the of it AFF10, General Structures Society
because
support
the
infrastructure
On
systems
a.
measured
offsetting
States
in
durability
delay
highway
bridge
bedding
data
soil.
This
D1.5
long-term
the
urban As time
with
project
Bridgerail PPPs
settlement
basis
Conduct
and and
local as
likely
properties
agencies
effects.
shown and
at
injury will aof
that
throughout
Welding
can
aby
buses
these
concrete
sustainability
continues
surrogate
distance.
dataSome
leverage
traffic
literature
variationshave
NCHRP
contribute
toand
of
restricted
from
Code
size
the
thetomade
congestion
aging
for public
spread
age
review
in
suburban
In
implemented,
concerns
Report
of
world.
aconcrete
hospital
to
(SMAW, multi-the
sites.
with
and
sewers,
measurement
design of
Water
have
647
SCMs
footings
grow,
occurs
express
SAW,and to is
media
charged
perceived,
has
maintenance
such
Problem:
resources
or
information
the
on
culverts
multiple to carried
need
the as
tip in fly both
pozzolanic
the
roads,
and for
formsandand
with
ash pilesofaudio
useresponded
and
clearinghouse.
repairs,
and
distribution
of it
existing
forsome
the
that
dementia and
nanoparticles.
ground ofvisual
trees.
efficiency
Service
reconstruction
increments to
the
pipelines. and by
granulated
Limit formats.”
road
Research
of
their The
tothe
State andrail
Critical ADC50, Historic and ArcheoloSociety Environment
of
assumptions
resource
buses
steel
objective
various
Additionally,
arisen
records.
Recommended
implementing
FCAW, soil
II. Research modulus.
confirmed
used limitations
degrees,
regarding
GMAW, in
framework, noneed
these Historically,
that to
culvert
current
structures
Design
AASHTO-HSCOBS
Objective
and are
ESW) be
Friday
structures.
it is identified,
currently
necessary
inspection
short
Specifications
using and density
modifications
radius the
ASTM and
“Grand is
tofor
A709
Report
hardened
users.
surrounding
needed
blast-furnace
Mitigation
private
loads.
new
capacity
applications
impact 99
This to
sector
However,
construction
on take (forthcoming),
cement
knowledge
learn
for soilaslag
the
to
include
critical long which
how
makepaste
(GGBFS)
adverse
structural
grows,
drivingtime can
conduit has
roadside
the Uses
phase
and
to inform
caused
and
effects
delivery
designers
skills. the
realize, of
crossingsin
trees
Fibers
The Social
concrete
to voids
demand of can
theare
review
measured
III.
evaluated
expected
were
Immediately
have
programs,
guardrail
appropriate
Live
Challenge
Describe
bridge RESEARCH
best
aasteels.
Load way to rather
and,
system to
which be
leveraged after
bedding
Distribution
1:
pricing PROBLEM
where
one
standardize
Extending than of
incorporate
has
theories in
amaintained
fire
been modulus
the
thickness STATEMENT
appropriate,
properly
event,
toService main
the
able
Buried
and the because
scaling
formalized
to
when
Life.”
strategies, meet deep it
of AFH10, Construction Manag Environment
Media
can
designers’
to
be
under
historic
previously
more
The
for
opportunity
under
should contain
form
introduced in
concerned
purpose
aggregates
highways,Public
around
variety
properties
culminate as
ability
infeasible
of
for much
and Transportation,
the
of
this
expands. to
with
transit
streets,
with as
accommodate
structure.
conditions.
under projects 50% Section
differential
research to Nevertheless,
manage
railroads
identifying calcium
is more toidentified
without
Correlations106 (older)
develop
growth
and
research of
is
SHRP2
included
environmental
distributing
residual
each
inspection
NCHRP
fills
Research
One
Structures,
and easier
areofrelevant
their to
Renewal
Reportin
capacity
encountered.
the Problemdo
future
services.
scheduling
primary
the
application so.
350 Project
challenges
performance of
mechanics The
ora
Statement adequacy
specifications.
MASH
These
limitations
to R-10
fire-loaded
and fare facing (Project
measure,
documentation.
of Test
concerns
this
policy. of of
the
structure
Level
using This to 3for AFK20, Characteristics of Bi Sustainable
are
multicultural
hydroxide.
road
compromising
were
the
possible.
settlement
ain
high
other
gaps master
travel users,
found
National
quality
or plan
demand
transportation
encouraging Thd
and
among
Nevertheless,
that considerations
safety.
Historic
for
aggregate cannanoparticles
guide the
(and the development
develop source
Preservation
Public
implementation
materials
congestion)
lines,
replication where as
forces an
can
and
Private
ofare area
use rapidly
Act
ininof
studies the
ofon
the
of a
density
Management
Resistance
United
must
make
(TL-3)
magnified
During
health
interaction
Severely
will
It Most
is be
include
well it
of as
States
safety
the
data ain
assessed
possible
these
limited
established a surrogate
factors Strategies
as
performance
the
Strategic
are
for review for
programs,
case
different are
population
for
transportation
budgets of
thatofmeasurement
to
Highway for
abe
determination
decision among Complex
however,developed
growth
criteria
hard
necessitate
innovative
the makers
Research
most decision-
concrete,for
fare and
areof
brittlefor
to high
cost- not
further
convert
educational
In
Scope:
proportion
often
Partnership
superstructure addition, research.
entailsthis
Over of paste
countermeasures
piping
the
an the
agreements past However,
to
of
SCMs
“economic”
components. more
water
two and
are of
decades,these
flows the
Fibers
exercise
usually
Both with C-S-H
has the
United
for of
very Sustainable Environment
national
becoming
near-term
trenchless
previously
modulus
Projects)
the
unsustainable
While
whether
make
tailored
speed
foundation.
Program
making
metal
effective
policy
part
considerations basis
of routes
valid
anda toclearinghouse
roadways.
is increasingly
found
of
the
(SHRP),will
technology
conducted
depends
that
repair acomparisons
yield
ferritic
be
water
clearly
structure
national
thermoplastic that
inconsistencies
health
of
were
tied
the
steel Inon
older
management the
many to
can
withfor
scarce
empirical
practices
have can
audience,
data
weld
not
the
means
among utility
reduce
cases
performance-grading
culverts.
bridges.
the are
is
rate
persons
that
different
remain in
and
primaryoftenby may
continues. at
dissimilar
arethe
strategies
the Also
Repairing
which
with
which
inday-of-
not
HAZ focus not a ANF10, Pedestrians
binder
potential
potentially
States
curing
trying
complex,
absolute materialto
transportation
conditions,
to estimate
are
and influence
removed that
associated
differential is
concrete
the soil already
the
policy
value with perceptions
support has
set
settlementsof huge found
thetime, from in
historic of
information.
expensive
people
disruption
Alzheimer’s
Scope:
relationships
complex
actually
It
week
service.
objectives.
comprehensive
private
system
aggregated
captured
adue
that
of
concrete.
this
beneath
transitioned
strength
property
uncertainties
can
member have
to
either
group be are
Sidewalk
occur
ridership
or
that
its by in
arguedto
been
prepared
transportation
Unfortunately,
public
ofto
coarse
research
the Lab
in
development,
adversely was
Specific
many
transportation
disease
between
awithin
simplified
aaand
from metal
results
manner
structure. that parts
maintenance
characteristics,
in developed
geographic
adopted
grained
to
effort.
focusing
to
addressing
entity objectives
the
we be
is
design
bridge
have
affected,
require that
To
and
of
validate
density
project
bypipe
in
the the
passengers
the
unwilling
a
and
lack
for
scale
is
transit
structure
demonstrated
the enhances
mainly
cracking
longand
and
all country
what
practices
and isof
asphalt
methods problems
United
overall
frequently
extent that to can
financed
backfill
and
on
taking
term is an ANF10, Pedestrians
that
Environment
be
follow:Identify
because
when
associated
measures
should
modulus
can
materials
States
trends
quantitative
NCHRP
structural,
relocate ofhave interest
be
are
were gravel
traveling that
a
Project
the asare
notwith
addressed
pronouncedto
have
specified
not the
mines
by
paying
assessment
hydraulic,
driveway, maintenance
backfilled
transferrable
clear.
12-67, organizations
road
been inand
as
forSome–
a TRB
effect
publishedwell
the rock
whether
trenches.
to
previously
procedures
geotechnical,
intersecting as
real
routes engineers.
other
synthesis.
on to
quarries
the
asthe
costin be
have
has
report
and and
SCOPE:
This
too
binders
common
less
agencies
carbide
that
their
voids
automobile
potential.
action
analysis research
large
expensive
3-5 isof
mobility.
and for
inlargely
both
dissolution
day soil
commensurate use
costs will
analyzing
than
in
treatments today
support
infrastructure, especially
based
the
and due U.S.isthe
fabricating on
the
to
have
problems
with
revenues. and what
the address
effects
fact
efficiency,
the weld
increased is
that
aAssetnew
exist
loss. of knownsix
as one.
and (6) ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
involved
are
buses,
cognitive
Given
established
ultimate
accountability
benefit
barely
frequently
590,
environmental
roadway
As
issues anbeing vans,
the
developedof (e.g.,
cost
discernable
increasing
on or lost
impairments;
severely
water foror
resulted
other
Congestion, to FHWA,
to
of cars.other
different
adesign
as
issues, the local
Friday
conflict
number InAASHTO,
constrained land
terms
what
and
materials
incompressive
utility and
Energy soil
and
structure uses.
ridership
function
ofanddo of
impacts
types
construct
regional
not APWA,
involved.
the
communities
and ownersThese
the
resources byeffects
produce
State on
it, as
specific
as
the
If
internationally.
thermal
concrete
Over the
the load 60% useful
bridge transportation
increases
cycle.
tensile
of is
thetemperature
historic,
Special
The and theAmerican
electricity interventions.
relative
there interval,
consideration
generatedis distribution
an
Welding or UTI.
A
shall
in
around
safety
Unfortunately,
management
When
IRWA,
aggregate
impact
While
critical
facing
laboratory
well
V.
water
whereas
choosing
framework
condition
DOT
promote
Environment,
further
The
of
additional
be
Society load as
isof
to
use these
on
driving
local
the
resources
left
performance
given
accommodating
evaluating
DBIA, materials
of
others
toand
limitation
to to
(AWS) the to
with
walking the
congestion,
or
final
RESEARCHthis
close
cultural
examples
structures,
the
requires
skills
governments
field
enable scope
are
have
performance
dealing
Infrastructure,
culvert
has and
and
is
value
settlement,
utility
grade are
technology
remain
testing. of
OBJECTIVE
decreasing
the
benefit
never large
replace
the with
bicycling
relative
of
research
of
aindustry,
level
(PG)
the
strategic
classified
traveler
and
work.
pricing
an
Since
and
optimization
of
prescribed datais
constant
aof
needs
bothhistoric
related
Emergency
to It
preserving
and
in
quite
structures
safety
to who
asphalt
the
for
increasing,
there
alsois
quality
improve
strategies a
of
short- use
soilHAZ are AFP40, Physicochemical and Environment
all
of Bi
strengths
Objective
Eastern
needed
types
There
property
approach
term
academia);
and
travels
Several
it
across
pedestrian
relatively is and
placed
largely are
as U.S.
to is
states by
a
dementias;several
to
large ain over
is
determine
transportation
difficult
long-term
passenger produced
consider
quantities
are
contractor
safety, changes 100%
structural
inandto needcost and
estimate.
on-going
components
rather
accessibility, by
system
based
driven
where
in for
modulushave
coal
effective
Fibers
than
a users,
on An
operation
pragmatic
industry
impacts
and reduced
mustthat
as means
old
witha are
be
may Environment
found
and
actionable
based
bridge
compatible
problem.
public
Preparedness,
confidentiality
binders that
quantity.
onprogram
health,
that visual financing
effects.
with
are Aquifer
the
and perception
management
requiredculvertWork anddepletions
environment,
purchased Safety. project
is needed
managementof
health
today surface
decisions delivery
for
and is to AFP40, Physicochemical and Bi
can
members
from
toughness
Issues
the
combustion,
of
including
available
photograph
and
considered
specifications
driver
solution
differ
liability
relatively
change.
the
migration
detecting The
maintenance
byhas
engineers in
for because
private
associated the
specific
concerns,
small
These
requirement
objectives
pedestrians
the
inof
a with
and rate
same sector
market
family
design.
and
compelling with
representing
subjects
they
of
resulting
locating
needs
testing
dementia.
changes many of
and
impact are
and
for
information
chlorides this
place,
members
Current these
while need
primary
their
welds
techniques
agencies
in research
abundant
bicyclists. but
regardless
long-term byvoids
infrastructure
density, long
involving
AASHTO toadata.
adoption
used
to
would
be
equity
factor
name
gone
density are
from
thatofin
method
This
domestic
confirm
damage.
considering
An
strategies
neighborhood
These
defined research
under-useddata were
rail and
This
and
asConventional
thetransit
multiplehighly
will
agricultural
type
constraints methodology
systems.
livability, correlated.
significantly
ridership
of emergency
objectives.
there water inis aid
patterns, While
It
motor in
demands
adetailed
need and to ANB70, Truck and Bus SafetySociety Environment
investigated
witnesses
by
bridge
include
of
1)
quantities
within
According
abenefit
might
the
LRFD
·mode.
are
problem
owners,
b.Convene
must
financing
achieving
are
identify
replacement
described
carrier
Typically
broaden
fewthe
seven.
to economic
not public
the
that
fetch
specifications
Conduct
be always
from
unsustainable.
andin to
fabrication.
the
determine of
measured
research state
the
these
the the
geotechnical
three
several
for
the
structures.
to
are athe
aquantify arange
sector.
following:
fly
few heavy
the
ash
promising
assessment
linked
goals
tends
nation’s
2010
survey
State:
summary
andis expert The
pennies
doas
with
of
to
federal
of
Surface
to the
methodologies
traditional
understanding the the
can
correlationtemperatures
truck
only
chloride
residue.
USDOT
notof for
the
consultants,
underlying
be
intensive at
oflimit
loads
industrial qualifications
the
provide
stakeholders
panels:
of application
evaluation
best
considerable
highway
June
systems
prohibitively
solutions
of
between
The
policy
atrade-offs
yard 1)
2005
toclear
researchand fly
health
practices
factors
for
carrier
pedestrian are
over
ofash
sale, of
Determine
and
which
assure
heritage.
of
Over
extraction
the
occasionally
statement,
but
among
and weld fine-grained
levelthethe
that
development
its
concise metal
owner last
of
alternative the
material
culvert
alone
safety
“The contains
might
explanationeffect
prescribed
several analysis
does
DOT of
arecannot
options. of
capacities
years,
not be
particularvariable
significant
policy
as be for
in expected
the
there
increase
follows:
of is
willing
This
the are
to AWS bedding
roadway
two properly
has
amounts
approach to to been
part ABE20, Transportation EconoEquity
the
geomechanical
others
professionals
for
accuracy.
projects
Grand
continue
affecting
expensive
scaling
case
The
not
and practitioners
aggregate
sidewalk
study.
Federal
very
bicycle stillis
Challenges
Friday
and
performance have
usually
torecognition
practical Case
Highway
safety. resource.
maintenance.
have can rail to
(stiffness
questions
responsible via
posted
high
studies
for help
rapid
have
This public
thedepletion
measures characterize
Though
and regarding
for
by Sidewalk
ridership
significant
might
Administration
sites
includes strength)
screening
funding,
the be
and the
AASHTO
demands
todamage. make
used the toit
thicknesses
transportation
have
evaluated
In
Bridge
aof
strength
sites/sections,
The
incorporate
Polypropylene(
with
combines
components, unburnedacceptable
particular,
growing Welding
objective
it for and for on
thousands the
can
carbon
safe
engineering of asthe
plans
rating.Code study design
performance
actually
perceived
this
and
structural
corresponding and
Overly
(AWS
in
(i.e., will
research
convenient
of and the and
programs.
high address
causeD1.5)
by
–fibrillated),
dollars. economic
load under
conservative
isaging
loss to are
walking
In on Yet
the
assist
factors,thefield
road
purpose,
I.
traditional
The
and
disturbance
maintenance,
airports,
Highway
that
deviations
impacts
possible
tell
(FHWA)
prevents
pedestrian RESEARCH
Ridesharing
drainage
assessment
are
awelding content,
impacting
on
to
comprehensive
developed
the procedures
seaports,
Subcommittee
from
theto
compare
and as
bridge PROBLEM
overlying
of
weekday
traveling
bicycle and
Institute
characteristics
definedimpaired
and
water and
awhere
endand structure
on
comprehensive has STATEMENT
current
quality
and
safety of
infrastructure
here,
transit Bridges
averages.
public.
weight
holistic any analyzed
drivers;
in graded
is
agenciesofthe
and
them
story
other
parking aand
and 2)in
Some ofas AFB20, Roadside Safety Desi Environment
the
like
performance
there
conditions.
rating
Arc
following
macroetches,
transportation
The
users,
ignition)
state,
Steel
case
analysis
and of
the are
procedures
assembly
and
federal
bicycling
(low a todueexamples is
questions:
the
carbon),
building,
limits identify of
to
and
to pipe,
economical
side-bend
of community
level
the
facilities abe result
treatment
local
the of
common
Glass box
safety in sections,
tests,
government
into
real
cost-effective
used groups
expensive
for
that
(alkali
in estate uselocalized
setup
transportation
design. reduced
provided of are
consistent
resistant-
value low to ofto
national
Nationally,
specifications
rates
aggregate
pavements,
Medical
function
Recent
well
Structures.
quantity
indices
Transit
Research
utility
how
program
hazards
lot as
areas. of for clearinghouse
road-based
base
Advisory
of
technology
transportation
requiring
agencies
functions.
particular inis
around as and
The
route
needed
1986 fuel
have
preserving, (GAB)
7are
motor
the The
to prices
buildings,
Board been
Grandcommuter
innovations
hydrologic
propertiesstruggling
to
address
bridge for
stone trend
members
repairing
agencies utility
adequate
and
Challenges
facilitate
project
carriers from delivered
(number
the upward,
other
to
have have
at
the and theand
deliver
global
being led
are:
andat AP025(2), Public Transporta Sustainable
structures
using
replacements
repair
•·the
section
or
involves
nitrogen
aagencies
projects.
with
investment What
reliable
road
historic neighborhood-
of
Accesstension
zirconium), are
standard
user
oxide
to under
damaged
travel
Every
building to
inspect or
examples
test,
mobile
according
decisions. (NOx) deep
upgrades,
times steel
trenchless
and
transportation
Polyvinyl
might and
Charpyfills.
burners
While ofand
technology
are to
remediate
be the This
county-level
while
alcohol, iron
innovative
V-notch
important
technology
low, in would
recent
agency,
companies due their
Carbon,(CVN)
to to
information;
roadside
have
‘passengership’,
highly
buried
associated
restoring
municipal
modifications
size
the
development
demonstrated
adopted
need
properly of
most generally
to variablemanagers
infrastructure
business with
hard-surface
level
effective
new
identify,
protected for
of produced
the
safety that
gradations
licensing
rapid,
have in
collection
districts
guidanceservice
methods
quantifybyorais,every
that the
variety
a other long
sidewalks
portable, to
occurs
served,
with
for
and
longitudinal state
rates
and
inthe
authorities; thelasting
financing
an
management
rate and
at
in
and
compact
storage.
station
limitedinformalwhich
the and
include
data
Modification
unconservative
members.
pricing
At
and
travelers
bladders
International
years.
sewer,
including
Cellulose
the
bidding least
locationThisanswering
toabsolute
understand
strategies
80
all-weld-metal and
that
culvert,
on DOT,
and Corroded
US
ash and of
the
hold asphalt
rating
cities
Assessment
and
has
Nylon.
Public-Private the
that health
movement areas
are
atension
treatment
storm
the
condition following
are
carbon binders
procedures
reportedand
can
being
tests.
Programme
tunnel
responsibility
of ofthe be had
used
goods.
liquids
content could
restored
to
While
building, been
beof
to or12- AP025(2), Public Transporta Economic
Since
territory
roads,
people
construction
vicinity.
3)
keeping
devices
instruments
1
Water
character,
resources.
assessment
way,
practices
culverts.
barrier.
By
questions:
transportation.
an
result
to
have
advancing -patient
Extending
but
design,
available
original in
the
there
using
Theare
them
for
depletions
did
and
The
In care
route
Revenue
premature ofseeking
is
field
that
not
many
parking the
sites.
expansion
in
the
endlikely
advocates
Service
post-event
technology
profile
potential
streetcar
road
condition
attempt
Cities
differential
GAB
measurement
are
in
length,
outcomes
by to
ways
significant
for
streams,
product
cases
lots is
of
available
someLife are
such
deterioration
padding,
be
projects stop
the aPartnerships
prior
to
their
mostly
soil
damage
adopted formal
was
areas
as ofcontrol
representing
for
waterState
as
settlement
trip
around
safe,
of
and
spacing,
including
to these
the
Madison,
and a soil
systems
with
the and
by and
new
means
to
delivered
the the use
for
the
·(iRap)
This
within
20%,
structures
improve
but
must
RESEARCH
criteria
·work
cost
opportunity
from
pipes
dementia-specific
convenient
modulus.
of
2
have
the
specification-
interventions.
side
may
the
publicof Internet
has
ride
the a
Star
being
Optimizing
express/local/zonal
fare caused
revenues
bend
reflect
given
no
historic
consider
are
Investigate
roadside
determination
Rating
using
conditions
asPROBLEM
quarries,
Devices
private value
based
for and
access
section
this
passengers,
replaced
and environmental
or and
A
a
mowing.
better
accessiblereduced
resignation
protocol;
as
technology
value onbut and
include
partnerships
Structural
estimation
case of
a
long-term
a“Culvert
sample or of
of
STATEMENT
service,
sales value
organizations.
residual
study thepipe.
concrete
and
occasionally section
and
opportunities
engineeringthe of and
Annually,
use.
the
Systems
taxes, of
is to by
building
found
excavation
impacts
Prior
approach
successful
(P3)
“radialness”
were
2)
be
Humboldt
capacity.
scaling
not
the
a
to
additive,
is to
that
hit for
oftoto AP025(2), Public Transporta Development
Society Environment
publication
Department
frequent
WI
outcome
even
steel
transit
provide
tension
public
treatment,
identify
and
equipment
walking
The
might have failures.
can
cannot that
addition
be the
and motor
GIS-based
of
be
agencies,
circulation
test great titled
some
grossof
SHRP
joined
do
site
be
thatbicycling
of Transportation’s
vehicle
is
fly
insofarand
include research.
systems
to
and
congestion
cracks
characteristics
efficiently cost
ash, old
what
and
as and
are to
generate
the Inspection
are
re-burnt
effective
GGBFS to
many pedestrian
of
What
HAZ,replace
is
patched the
integrate will the
each
inevitable,
that
and and
people lessons-
by with
other PG
is
using
optimize
As
assumptions
information
individual
achieved
significant
recycled
ground
c.
Maintenance
GeoGauge,
increasing
3
Currently,
have
or
hard
Although
functions,
controlled - global
Pending
Accelerating for
affected
“feederness”,
by the ain
crushed bid
positioning
states
in
there Briaudand
the
transportation
Great
instead that
clearinghouses
sustainable
variation
installation
the outcomes
includes
Bridge
threatened
is andGAB
a includes
judgment
spend systems
between
Compaction
highway
Recession
long
leaving ofmillions
engineering
produced
repairing
whether new
ofsector.
Construction
related
and
history
it annual
rather
in
toandUS(GPS)
activitiespipesof
surface
Device,
endangered
colleges
eachof Each than
cities.
some and
dollars
activities
are can a
slow As AHB10, Regional Sustainability Sustainable
aexperiment
Manual,”
require
activity.
·As
neighborhood-level
system
severely
learned?
development
just
so
non-shrinking
account
current
dependable.
walking
industrial an ab,What
merely that
While
showed
example
statically
BroadbandforFHWA-IP-86-2.
damaged abicycling
effects
achieving
technology.
and observed
byproducts design
there
of
within
The was
loaded
grout. how does
sections.
access and
exception
are
sustainability
that
downtowns
Recent
ability test.
consistency few
an There
the
important
discrepancies
into
to to itincreased
cannot
state
addition
However,
Since
data
determine
their
cement isindicate
be inand
and abridges
or
this critical
travel of
work
theof Transportation Systems
might
resources
Internet
systematic
transportation,
mowing
practices.
aand
result
defects
Prima
financing
4
are
species
were
to
research
individual percent
manufacturers
- Advancing
being
recover. see
in and
Light-Weight
(South
present) for
connections
roadside
For
of
ground
determine affected
assessing strong
scientific
all
changes
alternative
Transit
agency. operation,
the and
example,
road-based
are heave
Platte
could if connection
turf,
also
AASHTO
by in
be are
research
identify
carries maintenance
level,
Deflectometer,
regional
River)
ridership
the getting
collectively
sufficient orlocally
utilized.
developed
performance key
commuters,
settlement.
with
that
and between
findings,
available
evidence
controlling
Specificationsand cheaper
features;
Millions
it
impact small-
a
global
and
operating of and
The
isolate
need
acquired
national
bedding
indicators
polymers
is
Problem tocell to
the specific
update
to
crash
thickness
and
that
national install cause-effect
other this
databases
include have publication
anything
additives
transportation on
health available
therelationships.
less to
than
design
increased
and to theand
engineers
•between
activity
are
times
that
size
transportation
Fibers
the
replacement
for
associated
estimated
aggregates,
car,
tons
soil
exists
vegetation
scale
different
5
phenomena.
water
correlated
costs
materials
AASHTO,
The
How
subject
and
vanof
loads, rather
approximately
building
to
plate
- reflected
Monitoringusage
have
advantage and
GAB can
centers.
theare
location
inphonemultiple
to to
pulling
develop
set to
under
state risen
than
and
bus
are reluctant
specific
variable
objective
costs
overestimate
be users,
manufacturing
encroachments
load of
for It more
Bridge
is
ridership
Many
of
systems.” as
passengers
used
tests,
with forces,
unclear the
transportation
fire,
governments,
of the
fare
eliminating
68%
combinations
their well
in to
are
loading,
ratings
informational/toolkit
constraints and
Condition
fuel
there
case
of
voids
personal
innovative
than or
patternshow
specify
policy
asattracted
this and
repayment
underestimate
$500
byproduct
construction
and as
the
and
prices.
has
study (excluding
possible
and well fatigue
congestion
andhigh-
can
history.
mobile
Dynamic
each
these
projects
and
been
welded
objectives
then
million.
as
Squeezed
toofthe
little of ANB70, Truck and Bus
Management and
Environment
incorporate
required
quantify
how
transportation
the
infrastructure,
Surveys
repairs
be
streetcar
and
·subjective
has
Evaluate
carbon
prepare
improve
Problem: do
useful
fracture
become to
Social use
fly length
parking
these high
old
concept
the
contracts
concrete new
in
become
media
the of
effects
data.
the pipe
lot
temperature
questionnaires
material,
different
effectiveness
estimations.
ash (HCFA) byneed
Virginia
use
objective.
for technology
conflicts,
relate
The
having
ais
their
workability, in withCounty
part
pricing
concern
placed The
of or of
Departmentthe
visited
repair qualitative
monetarily
this the
interviews
because products
proper
Health
strategies
and
greater
in
durability asphalt
or
landfills,
is AWS
the read to
of Safety
Similarly,
lenders
applications
in
·drivers)
That –the
materials
highway
damage
training
snow/ice
Cone
constraint
6
events
and
trends.
by
research
international
methodology,
including
guardrail
assessments
the
and
allowable
Develop
amount range
Penetrometer
Contributing
product might
operations
higher with
bases
to
materials
and thea
creates
costs
completed
materials
end have
cost
archaeological
return
and
fluctuates
recycled
from
due
new
debris
influence
agencies
however,
treatment.
recognize to
(U.S.
and seriously
limits
–for test
an 5.3%
to on
pipes
targeted
(using of
its
removal.
impact
National
Fish
lower
on
(plastic
initially
equity
regional
the
haveis and impacted
settlement
aparking
prototype
unpredictably
granular
inbeing
to Akron,
satisfactory sites,
While
correlations).
revenues,
that on
PolicyWildlife
full-scale
begun
pipe),
State
and itin materials
installed
the
lots can tothe
Ohio,
coatings,
the
may
major
.many
tell
asandlong ANF20, Bicycle TransportatioSustainable
thea Operations Society
Rankings
binders
Transportation
to
AWS
and
about
currently
emphasis
treatment
thereby
desired
However,
and
Public
historic obtain
investment,
social
adversely
architecture
with codes
fare the
The
long-term
the by combine
outcome
lands
value
networking the making
information
affect
price do
structures?
development
does
on
consumingmethod
needed
musttravel
public
for most
of (VDOT)
not
strength,
of the
safety
a health
them
prescribe
servetime
in from
pre-qualify
the
research
valuable
the
common
site
investment
habits
web-based
fuel. is
and a more
that outcomes
responsible
knowledgeable
reliability
laboratory
government
but
is
of broad aa
land
metrics
calculated
technology resistant
welding
accompanied
will dynamic
gap
functionality reveal
decisions
information may
space
in for
used
as the toof
to
are
Problem:
project
7
Service,
transit –19.7%
mechanical
professionals
construction alsodifferent
Managing
transportation in
influenced
delivery In New
Mountain-Prairie
agencies or
the quality
properties.
and
Knowledge York
last toby
reconstruction
process.
management
increased standards
and
the
decade, The
individuals For 18.2% fines
trenchless
Region,
fares bicycle
example
and andin
content
activities August their
use a in in ANF20, Bicycle Environment
structural
develop
complete
and
Department
complex
term?
(morbidity
permanent
maintaining
individuals
procedure
•·correlation
the
test
also
field
and
agencies.
to
knowledge
population
the
are
savvy
rehabilitative
What
recent
thatAccess
reflect
costwith
creating
evaluate
often
bridge
clearinghouse;
properties
Honolulu. users of
performance
bridge
story
environments
are
includes
the
made and
or
ormoreof
deformation,
an
exist
base for
between
the
recovering
canas those
specifications
goal
national, well
management
and
mortality)
inventory
examples
implementation
increase
be people the present
linings.
Transportation’s affected
complicated
with
with of
potential
about as
used weld
making of
with
subjective
state,the
diverse
the
short-term
their for
with or
for
construction
to
transportation
These
with
of toand it
important itsystems
rutting.
18,985
by
wrought
successful
of
HAZ. in
potentially aand
disabilities
and
impact
variationinterests
behavioral
replace
anew
that
behavioral,
streetcars
estimated
local
time the
cut
realistic
use
in
costs.
that
iron
and
of
family
such
service.GAB
construction
·Significant
the
operations,
9,
Earlier
structures
rely
context.
technologies
these
dangerous
social,
Moreover, onas
United
transportation
2007). can
members.
widening
studiesIt
Meanwhile,
the As
traditional
Is andthe be
research
States
isespecially
under
methods
such,
design
itoutdoor highly
processes.
project
expected
have
require
pedestrian,
built-environment
also (Note:
ahas
fire
case
solutions variable
sidewalk
concerning
shown seen
others
benefit
showed loading,
in
the Use
It
funded
fromthat
NCHRP
studies maya
that
inclusion
bicycle, are of
theto
looked
derived and
marked
water pressurized
be
with
alsocomply
andthe
labor
particularly
areReport is
that
more
ofmoreoften
soil-
motor
from new the an Transportation
athat
bridges,
particular
or
pricingforsafety
Portland’s
scheduled
commercially
road steel of
strategies which
issue.
produced
Pearl
personal
and viable. In
the 7,205
in
District, comparison
before
regard
lifestyles
RPS, The or as 38%
to:
Seattle’s
proposed the factors
this
(e.g.,
attributed are
to other
South inthat
due workfor
fact to
aquatic
transportation
performance
desires
information
horizons
characteristics.
Scientific
Proponents
unsuitable
related
drilling
first
with
structure
increase.
municipal
Especially
perspective
resources,
agreements
broadly
in
590.
likely
nearlyregard
inspection
exposed
vehicle
increase
large
research
introduction
Lake
Other
·the o wave
All
to all
resources
for
to
mud,
culverts
Time
Union at
of
be that
accessibility
to
in
industries
Linguistic
criteria
As
to crushing
of
interaction
bonds
relevant
these
interactions.
counties
methods
that
of
soil,the
of of
may
permitting
strategies
the
meaningful
guidelines
greater
bedding
systems
high-temperature
of of
area, that
day
concrete
Various
mowing
particularly
materials
particularly use
strategicare
construct
must
post-fire
Grade
and
in
mightnot
systems
and inrisk
are
such
fares
outside
various
recreation,
process
requirements
to and
to
Someand
thickness
the
are
be
incorporate
needed surveys
hypothesize
developed
phenomenon
be
this
in during
Friday
increase
and
to
still
containing
lost;
residual
inspected
36,
Tacoma.
cultural as will
US,
of the
circa
road
in
visibility
delivered
research,
planning,
the States.
bridge
to the
Western
need
compelling
procedures
local and
focused
including
however,
have
provide
or
scheduling
public
properties
diversity 1962.
To
life-
quarry.
will
of adding
efficiency
proportional
as has
at
as
capacity.
it part
emulate atoto
be
U.S.
for
being of
dual
would
Roadways
In
mainlysome
Scanning
an
this
cycle
·Synthesis
decreasing income
road
increasing
revealed presumes
base/subbase
The
more
missing
been
bicycling include
on
costing
efficient
Prepare
crushing
directional general sections
cases,
the
links
performed 98 have
automobile
Electron
the families
drilling,
continues to intreatment
segment
and that
following: high
where
foundation
an
suggests
of the by and
the
potential
Microscopy
the
long-term
implementation
frequency
layer, nature
sidewalk
in can critical
and
of
orPinellas
stone
recent
to changing
of
Star
conducted
substitute
transit
lead
grow,tomeans design.
and
at
networks
years.lab
public
society to
introduce
so Rating
soil
asset for
(SCM)and
extent
agencies
the blowout
too large
support
transit
thatwork
Bridge
plan
virgin
quarry are
Because
doesfield
and
theof or
cost
shown
but
and
Recent
objective
both
injured that
decision-making,
jurisdictions,
to
the
thesethe
includes
could
commonlybridge
experimentation
o be in
increasingly
exceptionseffectiveness.
key Dayin
depth does
experiencesthe
advancements
target
culverts scalingas
accidents
measures
accomplished ofsuch
inspection
ofperform not
research
part
week in
audiences
and fill? orandexceed
other
of
One
functions
storm
as
of
in as
This
crash
fares
HAZ the
otherdescription
interaction
picked/bid
in example
these drain
without
program. the
parts
fire
for
food
datain
places,
toughness sites bonded
testing
order
motor of
systems.
County, any with
the
crew
of
(JLARC,
collection, below,
andthis
to
carrierFL,
testing
responsibilities)
core
protocol
volume
is missing,
modes.
Fibers samples use(see
These
from of
immediate
various followed
below),
HCFA. that
performance depend
Inand
sources bymany
repairs treatment
the on cases,
may
measures
has areliable
limited abe ofthe
these full
participates
will
that
mowing
broader recover
management
Internet
foundation
aggregates
partner
generally
laboratory
realize
safety
Facilities
future
find
surveys
Engineers
streetcar
as part
arrivals
scale
materials
made
includes
hydrofracture
broad
important
of
its othis,
amount.
is the
elected
country,
schedules more
development
environment,
detriment
2000, to the
risk
Adequacy
will
with
evidence
recognition the
attempt does
look
improvements:
have
Service
of
through
culverts.
identification
used
for
user
Additionally,
officials.
will could in
that
traffic
also
potential
designed
than
to
need
sponsors
their
can
avert is
capabilitiesofbiking.
items
increase
organizations
tonot
several
of
be
and
providing
by the
additional
of
the 20%
physical
to
information.
perspectives.
construction in
categories
welding
the
is
the
community
specific
structure togrowing
such
bound
decrease
San
bedding
know
need
replaced for
of the
soil
low-temperature
and
Yet,
encourage
policymakers
answer
Several
be
areduce the
stressed
are
fleet buscosts
as
Francisco
Management
advantages.
day. when
and
to
opportunities
number
now
litigation
reported
activity,
procedures.
At
roadway
with
collape,
This
surrounding
safe by
start-up
layers
that
financing
Grand
major the
and
has Also,
from
operating
multi-objective
accommodate safety
factor
the
40%
can
and
approach
ofas
further
as
making
welded
premium
understand same
suitable
and
and
coordinate
and
from
it
better
Challenges of
Surveys
per
and
asphalt
climate
aand
traffic-
The itits
the
the
include
use
to
may
year.
reduced
annual
severity
and by
travel
presumes
mechanical
boring,
research
convenient result
cement
ridesharing
understanding
credible vehicle
the
and by
and
mode producers.
that
in bicycle
significantly
costs,
of accidents.fewer
mixes. miles
the
potential
(carpooling/vanpooling)
strength
significant
development
conditions of the inuses
To
transport traveled
national
archaeological
by
and This
properly of
using
funding
environmental
for
performance preventive
untested
stiffness
of
pedestrian
rather (VMT),
parks
more sources,
identify
targeted site
of
than to
the
ofand has
inthe
charges
1, 2,range
function
related
properties
VDOTs
are
repairs
service
full
CVN
time,
HCFAs
4,
societal/global
change
costs
Metropolitan
possible
analysis.
operational
aquatic
accidents.
pedestrian by
relatively
test
goods
characteristics
5,for
where
are to
of
injury.
Highway 6,
0.6%
While
organism
surcharges
that may the
and
test
bedding
intended
and
contributing
are easy
be
movement bonds
that
7used;
events
median
using
Transportation
managers.
crashes full-scale
theMaintenance
are
normally toweighting
passage
are
not themselves
have
height.
to
most temperatures
vehicle-hours
createin highway
indicate (AOP),
parking
appropriate,
factors
this
has occurred
and
entails
strongly
disposed Authority’s
become ofthat cracking
Program.) become
bridge
lots.
led
cutting and
more toa
The
related
motor
other
no other
More
realistic
maintenance
hypothesis
aggregate
help
material
practice
travel,
complex
recreational
a component absorb
consequences. problems.
vehicle
public
theythanintrinsic
settlement
source
delivered
strategies).
buried lands
generates
growth
areniche.level
techniques
one-half
responsibilities,
of In
not The
are
value,of
criteria
quality
soil-pipe
the to in
addition the
defined
One of
highsafety
service
relatively
travel
overall such
needwhich
American
linked
site.to
system.that
frequency asof
(LOS),
sources
asdemand.
cost studies
look Ontothe
may
will
to Aof
workers
limited. the
no in
hours
teens of
and
of
large
deliver
Problem: Cities around the world have ANF20, Bicycle TransportatioEnvironment Economy
begun to invest in the
Problem: Federal and State Departments AFH30, Emerging TechnologySustainability benefits cycling has Sustainable
to
of offer their communities,
Transportation (DOT) are environment
searching for AFH30, Emerging
Problem: Nanomaterials have been Sustainability Sustainable
aand
successfully tool economy.
to quantify used
Cycling the
to improve
is being
environmental the
promoted
durability social Technology for Design and
Problem
as
and a healthy,
economic Statement environmentally
impacts of their friendly and AFH30, Emerging Environment
and
Construction
economical sustainability equipment
alternative of transportation mode operators of travel use to Construction
Technology for Design and
I.
operations.
applications Problem Statement Thisintroducing tool shouldtechnologies have the AFH30, Emerging Environment
machines
the
With
ability automobile.
the to to by manipulate
implementation
quantify If the increasing energy earth
of the andandresource
modal share Construction
Technology for Design and
III.
such
materials RESEARCH
as low-energy at OBJECTIVE
construction cements, and mining AFH30, Emerging TechnologySustainable Environment
of cycling
Superpave
consumption,
photocatalytic
isvolumetric
to bewell
as
coatings,
successful, as mix emission
and design this
self andsites Construction
method
healing
RESEARCH
by
transportation
and
waste manipulating
the PROBLEM
useHowever,
generation of stiffermode levers,
resulting STATEMENT
needs
binders,footfrom pedals,
to become
the rutting
design an ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
Ultimately,
additives.
How
switches,
integrated much and the
do
part project
specific
joysticks.
of lack
transport goal of is
improvements
Operator to
consideration
planning improve
training to
and
Scope:
problem
and
the
of theperformance,
netAsthat
construction awareness previously
environmental ofsafety of the
transportation troubled
and benefitslink economy between
many
may of ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
the
typically
modeling.
transportation
pavement
projects. pedestrian consists
Itengineers
will environment
and
also of operating
other
be has able disciplines
been around
to the physical
significantly
integrate
RESEARCH
our
yield tostops
transit
equipment nation’s offsettingPROBLEM
infrastructures
and impacts
stations STATEMENT for
and an overall
increase the benefit
walk ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
continues
minimized.
the
The
of
inferior itslife costing
availability
citizens.
product.toin grow,
Recent aprincipals
training
and
Specifically,
Many the
studies
quality
environment
interest in
studies this have
its
of in now
protocols
pedestrian
project
are being will
Scope:
access
while
In
measuring
indicated a report Sidewalk
mode
receiving thatonshares,
and maintenance
individualized
Separated
evaluating
reflection transit Bikeways,
and the system practices
instruction
pedestrian
fatigue ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
and
access
develop
carried measure to
outand transit
todeliveradded
quantifystops asocial are
sensor-platform
the benefits
critical
environmental for inthe that
should
efficiency,
about
sponsored
RESEARCH
environment
cracking be
performance
has addressed
and
by
PROBLEM
becomethe
will overall and
Institute
continue in a
transit
STATEMENT
atransit TRB
machine
tophowever, of
toconcern synthesis.
usage?
increase. controls. In
forand Environment
terms
use
aimed
impact
Given
addition, Trainingand of
the user
ofpromotion
to use
nanomaterials;
severely
how
provides
time,
state-of-the-art
much
health
of
constrained
some do pedestrian
basic
and safety
services.
remote
resources
operating none The ANF10, Pedestrians
Transportation
Research
Over
many
comfort
Objective
frequent the
Departmentsis
past
driving
absence needed Engineers
severalconditions. to
ofsidewalks
oftransportation document
years, (ITE)
Transportation tools
Hence Pedestrian
that how
and this
would ANB70, Truck and Bus SafetySustainable Society
technologies
of
facing
improvements
experience
and them Bicyclelocal focuses and forincrease
governments
Council, short
on
allows aabout and
for and
transit
significant long-term
familiarizationrelated
customer
need for
transit
methods
(DOT).
tool
In
provide
health a will
broad agencies
The
for ranging
enhance
monitoring concern
sense,
pedestrian havefrom
the of cooperated
informal
sustainability
envisioned
access
infrastructures stiffer to with
checklists
more
study
transit of and the
applications.
I.
pedestrian
satisfaction?
with
usage Research equipment
of Problem
safety,
separated Objective:
A sector.
considerable
controls, Statement
accessibility,
bikeways The proposed
amount
maneuvering, in and
the United of AFF80, Structural Fiber Rein Sustainable
other
to
brittle
transportation
would detailed transportation,
mixes
isask engineering-level
which will continue planning,
To especially
create and
analyses such lawwith
a
stops
bridges.
research
liability
research
efficiency,
States
Problem and
well At
has
concerns,
has and known;
the
Canada
Statement: as
looked itslarge
same
safety. many
has
however,
overall
at truck
time,theagencies
been goal ittransport
walking this
also thewould
identified. provides
enforcement
have
the
tool,
vehicles
“knowledge”
instant
initiation
Recently,
benefit
behavior
abeen
national methodology
provide
traffic
from of developedagencies
push
studies
high-modulus
of a
public is
flow the
mostly
summary
to iswith
use
greatest
information,
in
transit
to
needed
based
whichcarbon
of
address
more
users.
the
best lifeonintent
and
that
benefits
structure
cycle
fiber
practices
The
more
can to ABJ30, Urban TransportationEnvironment
of
However,
pedestrian
evaluating
recycled
evaluate
Problem more
the safety
the
asphalt often
walking
ecological at
pavement than
mid-block environment.
footprint not(RAP) it is
pedestrian
ofand a the
society
experiencing
digital
inventory
reinforced
for
pedestrian
While
difficult sidewalk some
while
tracking (LCI)
polymers
proposition
aresulting
general
maintenance
environment
vocational capability
are compiled
have
to
in
lack the
at
can
schools
provide been of
Sidewalk forleast
affectsidewalks
relatively carrying
developed
offer
separate
harm.
anair low ABE40, Critical Transportatio Environment
Climate
crossings
These
recycled
industry,
Specially,
and not change,
methods
on near
asphalt
assist
the data, transit
in
study energy
vary
shingles
selecting
since instops.
would security
their
related (RAS). Many
purpose,
sustainable
determine data and existing
Many are
cost.
out
Problem
with
maintenance, This
evaluations - will
ITS be of
services
as accomplished
the
defined environmental
(traffic here, and through
asisconductedthetravel Sustainable
individual's
equipment
bikeways/bike
quality
transit
degree
decades
materials,
crash
rarely
four
footprints
information In 2004, harm concerns
stops
ofof
available.
distinct the of
decision
training
are
formality,
research
products
per boulevards
Federal
work are
placed
ton-mile
Other
nano-manufacturing
provided tasks,
to
courses,
at
number
have
and Transit
to
walk,
the
in
pedestrian to
been
processes
(and,
including
end-users
most
all
forefront
locations and if
well
the training
types
for
possible,and
asofuse
where of ABE40, Critical Transportatio
moduli
function
tolerable
occurs
III. RESEARCH of
on of elasticity
the preserving,
walking job
PROBLEM twice
distance.
siteurban withrepairingthat Inthe of
addition,
instruction
STATEMENT and
existing
contemporary
the
factors
to
in
Administration
comparable
accommodations,
technologies
used
conventional
restoring
shortest
develop
construction,
by
routes
included,
traffic
a
or used
sidewalkmild
in
challenges
pedestrian
identify
(FTA)
volume-related
centers
an
data
identifysuch
in
steel. andpublished
the and
access
acollection
as in
practical,
data set-up.
transit
transportation
Preliminary
keeping emergencygaps route
the simple
stop
it in Transit AHB65, Operational Effects oSociety
Hence,
in
Environment
customers
from
The
to
transportation
involves
processes,
performance
I.
current Research experienced
proposed
promote demand
crossing cycling
and
Background
transportation research
sector. a
geographic
related safe
operators
in
busy cities
test High and
project
street
for
processes, it convenient
who
quality
scope. is atwill are
necessary
a and travel not AHB65, Operational Effects oEnvironment
Security
denominators)
covers,
Task
industry.
managers)
research
condition Ito Design
provisions
- Literature
These
has
for tend safe, forConsiderations
LCI’s major
for
toSearch.mergewill
convenient safe belarge
crossing,
This
atrade used
wider andoutlining
truck
task as etc.,
will
variety a input
ways
familiar
consider
to
behavior
challenging
Accordingly,
characterizing
As
guide accept
traffic the access
withthe
that
data
volumes benefits
mid-block
each
development transit.
formalized
cyclists
provides
the tool
cracking
in most and Pedestrian
will an training
location.
has of use
important
specific
areas
new behavior the In methods.
offs same
continue
processes uses, of or
how
configurations,
are
focus
III.
library
of
indicated
accessible data transit
also on often
what
Research
for
sources life
that agencies
use. notincluding
are
cycle available.
the
Problem
(from
externally
Maintenance could
assessment essential
different STs, benefit
Statement:
bonded CTs, and
studies
sensors,
includes and
high-from asto AHB65, Operational Effects oSustainable Environment
improvements
associated
adjacent
into
addition,
pros
(hot/warm)
to
or Training
grow the
and
activities in
andcons, this
with
road-space
analyses
many asphalt can
right-of-way
towards manner
roadway
mid-block
and help
required as
limitations.
mixes
a net meet
is
the and often
feature
to
crossings
which
reduction these
automobiles.
address
However,
available can near be
of
taking
many
desired
quantify
different
modulus
repairing a
HPV/LCVsystems
parameters
the
road
CFRP
surface sustainability
network approach
configurations
laminates
defects for researchers
managers,
can
and to
of designing
as
integrating
effectively
changes possible.and in be
demands.
Research
inconsistent
identification
these
transit issues. These
Problem and lighting pedestrian
Unfortunately, Statement
requires versus use due of
designed theto in AHB65, Operational Effects oEnvironment
many
used
funding
resource
security
[1]
The
engineers
There
different
used
level
improvements
Highway
physical
lighting
To
organizational promote
at
The
issues
as isinvolve
transportation
the
to
wellproject
to
nano
transit mix
build
requirements
systems.that
increasing
designers
equipment,
systems. asmake
cycling
negotiating
design
new
need
products Since
venue the
operators).
snow/ice
can
silos, (Note: include
are
as
professionals
to
recognition
which
data a
stage.
infrastructure
and
that
would
be
comprehensive
underinand
roadway
major
high-speed,
the
privacy is
emissions
time,
addressed
This However,
bethat
debris
facilities trend
increasing
expensive
mode
aare
feature
concerns
large
for of
high-volume
unaware
III.
despite
become
an
significant
western
successfully
assessment
successful RESEARCH
economically thisthat
limited,
U.S. funding traffic
effort such
PROBLEM
state
before
of
roadway the more
&to and
tools
there
socially
has
permitting
physical
highway
geometric are
been exist,
STATEMENT
is no
emphasis not
conciseness and
widely
provided
LCVs
conditions
structures equipped
design,is or, placed usedto toa AHB65, Operational Effects oSociety
and
transportation
reflects
for
removal.
walking
pressure
due
identification
transport,
and short-term
to
the the While
along
to
operating
high it need
maximize
is industry
strengthening
the major
lighting
cost importantcosts
of optimize
roadway primary construction
the and
generally touse (e.g.,
lost
assess data
of
data of steel
sidewalks
available
productive
refers or to
the
with
furthermore
The
test
on
protocol.
transit
preferably,
access
III. adequate
Interactive
used
adding
RESEARCH agencies
transit to do
Objective:
awhat group infrastructure
stops
PROBLEMnot
Highway
characterize
additional to have
implement
ofcan capacity
The contiguous
be an
Safety
the
proposed
STATEMENT easy
improved (e.g.,
cracking
to Design way
existing
security median
states to
healthy
in
accuracy
bridges.
reconstruction
on
right-of-way
time. particular
both Thereand
A and
sides successful
thorough
in
is coverage.
of activities
also are
streets;
freeway the designs
investigationThough
suchcurrently
adequate
corridors as for of aurban
end-users'
widening
to the AHB65, Operational Effects oSustainable Environment
single
safety,
collection,
crossing
determine
Model
behavior
infrastructure
research
technologies,
and
include,
As
available
streets,
information we
luminaire
Canadian accessibility
move but
mustaims key
islands,
(IHSDM) of which
systems asphalt
are
forwardor
to
but placed
players
is
effectively
service aan
pedestrian
tool and
decision
mixes
constructing
conceive,
provinces.
not little
to limited
withisincreased
implement
providers
to
the
often
information
serve
identify
appropriate
in
The
a
efficiency
do
crossing
support
terms
develop,
to,
more new notrisk
involvement
collecting
all
are the more
have
of
on of
in
test of
tool a
the
long-term
asidewalk
Background
provide
injury
roadway
the sidewalk to width
safety,
other toroad
element. complyto
mobility,
workers serve
Designed with andand Americans
pedestrians capacity
damage
lighting of with
tofor all ANB30, Operator Education aSociety
access
signals,
given
that
reflection
facilities
and
extent
of
data
sustainable
monitoring?
transportation
and
performance
Disability
Licenses
abilities;
growing atexisting
refine
least toetc.).
context.
consiststo
regarding
more to
the
withcracking,
aand
which
one
market
Act
smooth,
traffic
of
operate
data
Finally,
of
This
higherthe
multi-dimensional
U.S.
existing
What
transport
these
built
modes
steel
Accessibility
demand.
needed
project
state
operators,
level, motor
because
following
fatigue
iscapacities.
initiatives
the
and
bridges iscurrent
conditions,
environment,
infrastructure
for
would
cracking,
important
provide
Guidelines
vehicles
slip-resistant
With public
developing
pedestrians
modules:
life-cycle
reinforcedbenefited
right-of-way itand
status
an
are is
surrounding
systems
from
informed
are
Problem
document
intersection
low
Unfortunately,
assessment
from under a
temperature refer
mode-specific
an integrated,solutions
time
Statement
the property.
to
review,
tool range lighting
pressure to
cracking.
upgrading
that of
traffic
systems these systems
perspective.
tools
integrates to or challenges.
catch
analysis, and
replacing
approach designed
hybrid It
buses
methods is life
has ADC40, Transportation-Relat Environment
because
identifying
important
that
appropriate
authorities
with
(ADAAG)
regulated
sidewalk
limitations, individual
high-modulus the toand
are largest
requirements
by
surfaces; provide
balance
each
increased prioritizing
states
still of North
very
CFRP
buffer an
have
among
the use ormuchhas American
needed
integrated
undertaken
adding
fifty
space
of those
not involved
sates
context yet
between ramp
modes.
missing
and been in
to
thus
Key
and
There
in
driver/vehicle,
such
cycle
been
studies meet
use required
players
trains,has
and
facilitiesspecific
assessment
compiled
on in
they
been
establish
LCV to
reducingvisibility
policy
using
or
safety‘plan
may
a steadily be and
guidelines
principals
disseminated.review,
traditional
to requirements
vehicle
more
date model’
increasing
with willing
design
have as
design to
life the to
the
cycle on
In
improvements,
and
pilot
An
data
conducted.
links
the development
ramp
studies
effective
production
to
District
roadway sidewalkterminalto
urban
Furthermore,
of and of
identifying
implement
Columbiaon the
networksdesign
street
one
sidewalk), AASHTO
hand
for due cost-effective
that
health-
design
are all and
to LRFD
will must
the
important
drivers, provide of AFF50, Seismic Design and Sustainability Sustainable
sensitive
Recently,
urban
environmental
exhibit
concern
appropriateness
consistency,
One
solutions
costing
primarily
Bridge roadway.)
study.transport
risky designs,
the
over
is
principals
Design been and
under
often industry
behaviorThe
the in of and
network
footprintpast
crash
theresults
each
prohibitively
to
Canada.
Specifications assess implementation
has
at
two of
of
under
prediction.
National shown
include
mid-block acrossing
decades
the the
as city an
research
auto
differing
costly
well by about
Through as or Performance of Bridges
solutions,
for
monitoring
often
information
limited
Transit safe and
accommodate
number
and and efficient
systems
use securing
for
of
carpooling/vanpooling on motor
traffic
large-scale funding.
transportation
critical and vehicles highway These
emergency
specimens of the
for
with
roadways
managed
interest
will
treating
manufacturers,
crossings
the
circumstances.
2008,
Cooperation
simply
environmental,
Objective
AASHTO
pose
current
structures?
providing
an
provide
adverse IHSDM additional
in
cannot
significant
and
(e.g.,
facilities
cycling
Guide
training
near safe
guidance
effects
future
This was
Research
be as
electric
transit
Particular
social
and
accessible regulation
a(i.e.,
operators
only
Specifications
challenges ofmajor
accommodated
road
information
toconvenient
stops HOV,
exposure
and able
Highwaythe
utility
users.
pedestrian
mode(e.g.,
attention
to
economic
and
for
HOT,
using
following
will
companies,
forThetobe
assess of
Program
are LRFD
or
dart travel
should
because
further into AHB35, High-Occupancy Sustainability
many
management
which
(ridesharing)
conditions
commercial
signals,
TOTL),
equipment
design
similar
and
Problem types
havecurb
designers
and
to
transportation for- passenger
can
driver on
simulators.
operational
public
Statement: the
pedestrian
extensions, be
must licensing
transport other
powerful
planningThe vehicles,
maximizeand
Construction
decisions: or
realityhand.
travel, imposedallies
median
vehicular
agencies the
of trucks,
they – use are
such of Vehicle,
AHB35, High-Occupancy
High-Occupancy Environment
the
transportation
be
planned
(NCHRP)
of
performances
The
Seismic
complicated street
given
spaceproject to
or without
9-19 data
existing
availability,
Bridge would
by noise
evaluated
of
Design
related looking
collection
likely on
two-lane
environmental
transportation the
(SGS), five
require for health
requirements,
testsapproaching
rural
several several of
1)
American
studied
buses
However,
been
especially
not
across
islands),
freeway
equipment
1.
traffic.
as
improving
traffic,
exposed Doesdefined
State and
tested,
the
run
to
theand
cross
DOTs Association
determine
sometimes
“private€
if
the as
states awaiting
leveraged
simulators
simple
diagonally
populations. detailed
maintenance.
sections.
and by MPOs.
transportation the at
placement ifofownership
rail
across
The
State
remote
federal
transit
While
consist transit
data
understanding
together magnitude the
Highway
monitoring
providers
Although
stops
freeway
of
of a–a 3D
street, while
single (e.g.,
of of Toll, andHigh-Occupancy
Vehicle, Managed Lanes
and
highways.
dynamic
impacts,
applications
This
Concrete
years
unresolved
arrangements. the
research
of data relationship
However,
modulus
or other
overlays in
issues willorder
collection
ifMost test,
factors
document
in between
in
associated to 2009,
2)
conjunctionachieve indirect
that
toridesharing,
obtain the
the the
constrain
with data
crash
tensile
with
avirtual
the aA AFD80, Strength and Sustainability
and
was
also
(e.g.
the
creatively.
sidewalks
government.
benches,
cross
simulation
luminaire
infrastructure
not
these
and
prediction
creep
the
sustainability.
experiences
bituminous
sufficient
Transportation
used
accommodating
floating
load-transfer
check
design section
effects
intended
test,
and
toBy
are
shelters,
for3)
sample
car
computer
has
capabilities today
traffic
uses.
indirect
environment.
of
interlayer The
so,
embracing
not or
Regulation
design
identify transit not
of
what
mobile
mechanisms
subjected
and
main isafrequently,
Officials’
non-vehicular
guidance
approaching
HPV/LCVbeen arrival
application,
geometric
that
of
tensile
successes
usually
the
research
authorities
have
data)
to(AASHTO)
agencies
fully
been
of
IHSDMthe
time
resilient
crashes
transit
suggestsincrease
the
from
in
used
or
modes
same
consists
feature must
were all
as
and Toll, and Managed
Deformation Lanes
Characteristics
design
agencies
Policy
failures
such
their
Today,
high-modulus
transit
"traffic
of testing as on
role,of
indid doearth
Geometric
pedestrians
models
agencies
loads" for not
they
especially CFRP
as retaining
have
have.
like
have
qualificationsroads Design
andin the
fault
retrofit
been and structures
responsibility
Deliverable:
bicyclists.
informationtree of
has
seen
streets,
to Highways
analysis,
notto have
niches
yet
expand
in or AR070, Railroad Environment
information).
that
display
(curve,
Objective:
consider
lanes
determined
expanded
modulus
objectives
implementing
early
exposure
been
the
and
Synthesis
Additionally,
(e.g.
functions
been
their
some
12-foot
on
as
authority
Streets
specific
system,
intersection,
athe
test,
1913.
identified.
established.
market
ways
The
data.
lanes
multilane
to
are nor
contains
report.
performed
In
include
types
base,
maintenance
4)goal
environment
to:
More
for
space
addition,
andhave
security
Active
The
with
indirect
(a) equipment
of
pedestrian
of
Research
as
etc.)
recently
most
within by
this
street).
the
rural
developsystems
government
general
with
8-tensile
traffic/vehicles
well humans
of
to
provide
research
in
cost
multilane
critical
the
as on
them
the alicensure,
10-foot
Poorly- better
of controls.
unbonded
access
guidelines
any
planning
the
robust
and of
right-of-way
enhancethe areis to
effect
inside
isthese
moreor
just
to
life-
for of Pavement
Operational Sections
Safety
including
pedestrian
and
Simulators
safety
develop
Switching
of
designed
effects.
The
highways
fatigue/repeated
Interchanges
cycle outsidebenefits?
transportation
objective Most
assessment minimum
a(UBOLs) accommodations,
are
network
mid-block
and shoulders
operations of
of available
urban
represent the
theload
tool driver
analysis
projects; in
crossings
concern
synthesis
and isthe
test,
to in
railroad education,
ideal, full-motion
suburban
determine and
most has more
methodology
minimize canthere
yards
document
5) be
focused riders
indirect
complex, the is
the
aand and AR070, Railroad Environment
technologies
overlays
participation
unresolved
transit
the
must
types
treated
of
transit
challenging
minimum stops.
relationship
typically
of theevents).
operations. issues
same
than
physical on
and
In be bushave
support
are
addition,
of ramp
provided
There
way Ridesharing
maintenance
requirements,the
asbeen rail
anwould
for
functions vehicles,
used
distribution
transit
isdesign roadside
increasing
ofcan be in
agencies
speed roads
and many to Operational Safety
may
limited
static
2.
·for
account
negative
safety
primarily
is
arterials,
tensile
and
environmental,
I.RESEARCH Does
to be
mixed
hence risk
provide willing
research
formats.
afor
Automobile designed
travel
impacts
on
as
strength to the
a
most a all
potentialto
faithful
PROBLEM walk
findings
Full-motion
including
majority
of or
researchers
pedestrians,
convenient
test.
challenging
social, farther
engineered
construction; on
of bicycle
cardiovascular
implementation
None
and
STATEMENT resource
of how
simulators
employee than
and
particularly
them
instance
economic asand the
lightinga
thatwas on
of
of
infrastructure
states
required.
magnitude
often
the
Task
hardware,
need
performed
environmental
supplement
and
imposition
commonly-assumed
deviations
include
arrangement
major
duty
manufacturers
work
transit
effects
mainline over
operate
IIfatalities
to
streets.
to
- an
mode Embedded
reduce
customers.
(e.g.,
the
setState/provincial
of
by
of
from The
electric
of
components
the
in
highway
underground last
organizations,
transit technical
exposure,
sanctions
offer
and situation
these
transport
need
30
seismic
several RF
orservices
1/4-mile
significant
injuries.
travel
transportation-related
hypertension, Safe
years,
design
Remote
for
ideals
hydraulic
and and
objects.
in
and
Police
earth
jurisdictions
isprocesses
including generally
speed,
above- Sensor-
inindividually,
cities.
behavior the
complicated
criminal maximum
motion
benefits
convenient
myocardial
Accident
pressure
Althoughhigh- and AFB40, Landscape and
as
traffic
data
Environment
would
Part
found
these
impacts
Inappropriate
communications
with
Report
behind
thus
well
Platform
ground
Problem Care
as summarize
of
to
reports of
(PAR)
walls the
have
infrastructure
not
general first
Communication
utilities,
Statement forms
that
even good
transportation
of speed and
varying the
edition
are
guidelines
and part needs.
wouldis
other most
correlation one
information
degrees
restrained
of of
the important
the
At
products
of
likely
for
Design
urban local
the Highway
with
these
the of
need
in and
primary
systems.
their
design
fixtures. theto Environmental
A0020T, SpecialDesign
Task Force Equity
techniques
it
exposure
cost
by
behavior.
walking
or
platform
over
Currently,
Between
to
pollution
pedestrian
infarctions, is the
in possible
peak
investigate wide
acombination,
roadway toto
inmuch
1998 in
period, to
variety
replicate
the
access
and order
moisture,
Well-established
distance. and state
andfeature
of
processcan theto
2007
develop
to
arrhythmia) human
oftransit
Further,
will the put
chlorides
serve
parties
effect traffic
movements
identification
discussion
human
–capture
all failure
marginal
systems
systems
electrifiedfreeway
within
stops
and andand
responsible of
factors
is
immune rates,
that exist
the paths
Safety
observed
locations,
processes;
safety
The
performance.
be
ability
government
speed
Finalization.
Further,
Policy revised Manual.
hazards
benefitsto
of the
interest the
move
ramp infrastructure
fatigue
(c)
to and
The Base
In Methods
facing
accurately
design cracking
implications
lessons
laterally.
organizations
terminals,
in proof
low the
Minnesota,
should carbon to
developed
highway assessment
There
concept inof
learned
where
which
be assess
experimental
somedifficult
fuel users.
also from
they
includes
sensor-
coordinated the
tool
of
different oron on Climate Change and
the
travel
human
thermal
routes
for
to
have
operations
experienced
Problem sidewalk
certify data
been failure
thatloading in
are
providers
and common,
behavior
construction
designed
during on
costly
safety. andwith for
operation, in
is
record
Highway warehouses,
different
transit,
and
short the and
distances
designers
while from can
static
lighting
related
vehicles
economic
essential
system
methods
design
test
innovative
astandards
Most
implementing
earliest
truck
remains
operate.
freeway
platform
with
due
technical
the
increase
maintenance
provision
bicyclists
sections
methodology
totheroad
performance
placement?
incidents
such reality
for
deficiencies.
and
consistency design
documented
configurations
uncertainty in
agencies
Frequently,
entrance
currently
use
economies (LCFS)
failure
theof
and
and
as
transit
tools
thenationally
that
justification
(e.g.,
required
accounted
hybrid
of
ason
ofand
of
behavior.
budget
customers.
and
for
choices In
in-service
can
attempt
guidance
in
developed
“context” use
regarding
the
ahigh-modulus
state means
scale
and
addition,
to
multi-lane
crashes.
exit
education,
accepted
assess
of
local
for in
All
governments,
for
plug-in
constraints
succinctly
must to
contained
concrete
terminals
of of
HOV at
data
the
38%
Thisexposure
roads.
be
issues
achieve
Some
seismic
adjacent rural
reducing
and
hybrid
fusion
CFRP
of
and in A0020T,
One Energy
Special Task Force Environment
between
need
simulators guidance stops
do not to
on account
the
provide operational for
movement. poor and on Climate Change
3.
manuals,
railway
electric
and
project
to
describe
highways
Problem:
of
carefully
specifically
the
overlays
police
earth
government
highway
LTRC/CAMD-LSU
properties.
GHG
and
equations
reinforced
designations
different
existing
Under
the funding
transportation
right
FTA mainwill
training
pressure
emissions
quality
what
guides,
incidents
vehicles
their
wasand
and in reasons
related
operating
report, Any onwould
does
intersections.
control.
fault
bridges
levels
criminal that
conditions
shortfalls.
focus data
urban
thoroughly
is
of TH
behind and
leading
(HEVs
Transiton
noise
will
street not
growing
tree
has
serve
local
justice 12 be
Quality
reports
mid-block
requirements.
to and
for
speed be andthe
Security
east
free
have to
Managed
and should
suburban
understood
transportation among
necessary
However,
design optimized
analysis
nottransit
injuries
PHEVs).
ofthe
standing
the
rapidly.
been
jurisdictions,
systems of
revolves
difficulty
St.
that Design
data
are
as
an
lanes
pedestrian
existence
The
drivers
Paul
ownership
thewell.as [FRA
On-
during
is
based in
not
walls
land inIf A0020T, Special
well.
of Taskand
Force Sustainable Environment
walking
safety
Evidence
engineered
around
2005].
road
projects
crossings
of
benefit
arterials
developing
Transportation
only
applications
by any toconsumer
imposing of conditions
impacts
of
ensure suggests
“shared
The havenear
these
are the alighting
Federal
not thefor
all
cracking
including
speed use
travel
medical
resource
Research
the types may
cross
that
available. system
paths”
Railroad
potential
mobility
limits. test
but be
profiles
ofsection
there
problems
is able
be
and
to
transit
that
Development
Board’s
is
not due
goals
Unfortunately areput
help
it to
design
hence
improve
limited be
synergies
into
inform
stops,
would may
Special
to
are the toit is Energy
Considerations,
1955.
that
of
design
Problem:
this
successfully
California
high
on
conducted.
ridesharing
developers,
adequately Alsopedestrian
theperiod In
required
have of
importance thisability
Common
ramps
assumption of project,
meets
Governor
and
and
enforce would will
project. to
facilities
has
for
transit
private allbe
move
roadway
not
Arnold
that
and a
be highlighted,
5-inch
atraditionally
either;
Specifically,
of
travelers these
failure sufficient
laterally
alternatives
property
report thick,
ownership
construction
as objectives
well
rates during
the are
owners).
sanctions 24-
state-
been
as
follow A0020T, Special Task Force Sustainability Sustainable
redesigned
trade-offs
Simulators
between
service?
absolutely
Administration
design
mobility
including
predispose
serve
of
complex
Report
achieved,
heat
several design as
island decisions
298:awhile
national but to
while
transit,
present
essential
transit
individuals
point
consistency
nature Driving improve
also
mitigation, trying
(FRA)
reducing
of land
(engine,
stations,
and an to
entry
asphalt
thatand use,service
to
opportunity
consider
identified
to the
procedures
the balance
into
the
energy,
international and
amotor,
bus increase
higher
mixtures
Built
priority efficiency.
pricing
stops,
the waste corridor
bicyclists
the batteryto
level
for of
studies andintrain
and of
including:
foot
wide
seismic
may
viewed
practices
connectivity
is
Schwarzenegger
traffic
apackaged
Furthermore,
Many
for wide
currently
stochastic sample
belong loading.
as
managers,
jurisdictions
unacceptable system-wide
PCC
impact
an toof
often of layer
distribution
together, the traffic
the
integrated
the The
our
signed was
county
available
referred
especially
fatigue
they
have
driving security
environment.
an placed
monitoring
resolution system or
to
function.
capacity
can
ordinances
behavior. the
sensors
as
executive
in attract of
astrategies
over
abnormal stations
these
state.
consisting
We
of an
or aand
order
large-
Transit
Problem
capacity,
operators
strategies
It
as
following
sizing,
pollution
light-rail isa proposed
susceptibility
pedestrian
these
their
Environment:
preserving
emission
have part agencies
etc),
facility project
of that
for
and
stops.
interactions
shown network
factors
and
and
reduction,
that stressful
to
infrastructure
types
The and
enhance
that costs,
as
allow
minimizing
Mid-block
adverse
with
enhancing
the the
will
Effects transportation
analysis.
most
sustainable
speed public
and
workthe
estimation
provide
the the tough
frequent
crossingsgreenhouse
physiological
of pavement
public for impact
Compact
limit this of
aSP5209-22
full
safety
is are
very study
fuelon
suite isto A0020T, Special Task Force Environment
and
sand
with
issues
This
of
Impacts
data
“complete
on
situations
know
scale
even
laws
However,
There the architectures,
January seal
the is
dispersed
three
acquisition
that
bridge
larger
addressing
would to and
capability
essential
in streams
18,
(high
this members
market
thebe on
integral
street.” 2007 TH
ownership to
systems integrated
congestion,
assumption
sidewalk
value
area of
Theand169
safe
parts
that
share, of under
distinguishing
rivers
need
reinforced
in a and
willrepresents
which
initiated
is
displacing
maintenance.
discerning
driver’s be
forsecurity
economical
have
emergency)
true form
studied
more a
for
with been
a lowthe the : on Climate Change
planners
involvement,
construction
gas
would
contributors
savings
the
between
effects
of
structure,
Development
met.
landscapes
much
systems,
between
different
seismic
additional
ramp:
monitored
determine
“complete”
carbon
(GHG)Most be
environment.
assessment/evaluation
Problem mobility from
violated,
the
need
two
and
design.
fuel
reduction
carried
relative and to
other
environment,
commonly,
Saint
large
barriers
ramp
and
how
and
geometric
standard
guidance
environments.
these
to
roadway
on safety environmental
out Also,
asustaining
and
aspecificity
systems
Peter
truck
However,
areproper to
remote at effect
conventional
stressors,
Motorized and
body at
considered
to the
best regarding
intersections
incidents
certain
intersections.
process,
assessment
and
approach
improving
and
roadway Le
reduce
of
capacity Operators
ecosystems;
these serves
types. Seur
the
monitoring
each
including
Travel,
traffic between
types
in and
issues
the
impacts.
when
tools
only
to
when
This
physical
design
the the Energy
carbon
as
ofas
They ina A0020T,
in Special Taskand
Force Society
inadequate
technical
high-modulus
single
However,
physical/mental
realistic
ability
can
implemented
considerable
In
2001
technologies
managed
may
exposure briefquickly occupant
and
includeof auto
the the
2004:
lanes
to information
failures,
pedestrian
and CFRP
operating auto
together.
amounts
objectives
under
marked
occupational at
fitness
efficiently
projects least
has in
environment
of
“real-world”of
crosswalks based
not
a and at
growing
context/profile
toHowever,
may drive,
be
existing
this
noise, the
been on
enforcement static
there
introduced
research
lend orotherlow
number
changes
more
research is to
will Energy
would
Landside
for
loading.
Use,
restriction
and
a1967
designing
capability
Problem
cannot
conditions
appropriate
design
system
urban
intensity use
guide and
(d) a allow
be
and
can
areas vehicles—including
designers
Crack
CO2
simulate
to
6-inch at
does
Statement: practitioners
drivers.
and
resolved
for Emissions
interchanges
thick,
construction
be
oftransit terminals,
has
fuels the
exist
transit
employed
beenthroughout
propagation
implementing
for The dynamic
24-foot
A
within ability
some
low
users.
whether
well
light-duty the to
recommended
process.
and involve
carbon quickly
itself
wide
recognized,private
the
of
to
security
commercially
existing project
is ramp
exploring
influence
PCC
freeway
reliable
vehicles. fuel
Effortsa data on Climate Change and
and A0020T, Special Task Force Sustainability
quality
level
established.
of
patchwork
use
to
In
detailed
on
be,
operation.
themselves
unmarked
environmental metropolitan
these
impact
addition,
equipment,
crash
Improper data
inofcomparison
the regulations
of may
middle
The
there
information
reductions
to line
crossing result
areas.
evaluation usage
operation,
switches
alternative
noises, part
long-term
iswith vary
concern
at on
locations. Atin
of
transit
and and
the non
the
andthe
widely.
intersections.
and performance
(track
fundingservice
over desirable
magnitude
non-noise “bath
same
reporting
machine
The In
travel. the
switches time
spite tube”
We
part-
The
identify
automobiles,
development
complex
specific
connections,
innovative
vehicle
technologies.
overlay
available
standard
knowledge
or
have
transmission
much
The highway, been
has
standard an
research
speeds
was appropriate
phenomena
and
systems.
(LCFS)
beenbase.
madeand and
placedtaxis,
process.
In
achieved.
limits sets
on on
the
evolutionary
through
addition,
to
written limos,
Data
Therefore,the
overa
each
reduce
the where tool
potential
the
target
Thefrom
about
life sideshuttles,
effects
the
aknows0.1-mm for
other
cycle the
selection
to their
of
carriers
research
of
performance
the crack
treatment
technologies
experience
reduce
the land
impacts
weighted ramp of
is use Energy
the
traffic
curve.
of
Problem
some
approaches,
tend
time
controls.
and
work
not
strategies
crossings
stressors. steel
these
characteristics. fullyto
use and
However,
transit
characteristics
should ofThetravel
Statement:
challenges,
compare
aligned
to
may
All agencies
most
existing
result
help
of use
be Such behaviors.
nobody
mean
during
these of of
in
reduce Regulatory
there
them
shoulders
controlled seem
guidance
simulators
these
recommendations
car
concerns are
characteristics However,
reluctant
represented
movement)
financial by a about
and
number
would
astraffic
synergies saves
have HOV, the
the
to
of
need
fuel,
isof
been by of A0020T, Special Task Force Sustainability Sustainable
needs.
delivery
essentially
patterns
to
the
and
polyethylene
employing
greenhouse
needed
Safe
proper.
of
importance
average increase
directand
roadway
the Following
characteristics
benefits trucks
to and
developed
carbon finds
research
HPVsgas
provide
convenient the
mobility
construction
of and
resulting
sheet thefrom
form
would
(GHG)
designing and
of
a other
weakest
service
(bond the
sound the
and
development
from
pedestrian
sensor-platform,
intensity also
intensity vehicles
such
for
of mindset
location
roadway often
breaker).
be
basis
thelink
collaboration
as in
required.
transportation of for
access
dust,
safe that
andthat
of
the
involves these
and to
increasing
distribution
bridges
market
get
jurisdictions
aHOT
the
to
equipment
not
that
(16%)
·signals
Problem
constraints
well into
single
modes
account
or
available.
can
Identifying [FRApressures
Utilityname;
general
be
(i.e.,
documented centralization
reinforced
ridesharing. function
when
for that
wear,
applied
2005]. the
acompanies
and Medical
user
use
Research
allow
pedestrian are
are
it
and with
travel
in comes
totheofmounting
For
using
theother inand/or
human
high-modulus
demand
need
projects the
Advisory
characteristics;
facilities to
inherent
this
crossing
scientific transit
innovative
energy
during
geometric
to toareafusion
failure
thatBoard.
ofbe land
peak
risks and
would
cycling
signal) ofof A0020T, Special Task Force Sustainable
“what
travel
The
complex
more
(1)
efforts
the
among
However,
Crash,
transportation
aspects
transit
noise
especially
efficient
fuel. the
adjacenttogets
objective
compact,
mileage
and
Several of
stops and
asphalt
construction
towards
organizations
the measured,
the is
emissions.
the
travel from
bills of
first this
mixed-use
exposure,
fuels.
seismic
essential
communication
of all
that the
aggregate
enhancing
environment true of Fuel
user airport—often
gets
researchaunbonded
within
design
However,
would to and done”,
development
multi-lane
the
providers
modesserve isbetween
combination,
could transitcarrier
of
establishtheto
be
Earth wider
loop
overlay
transit
along amust athe
data
rates.
CFRP
would
agencies
practices
climate
use
hour.
damage
help
features
trips
understand
completed
or
literature, In raises
We
needs
context;
The
local encourage
between
2003,
uncontrolled. and just
that
to
analysis,
suchandquality
theto
the
trade-offs
the
sooner
mainly know
are
accomplish
injury.
as be
state
FRA curves.
different
electrical
Thefromand,
already
and
relative
than the
aestablished
transition
yet
between
governments,
Simulation
determined
most above,
failure
we
The
origin
under
studies very
high-quality,
cost,
grid know
appropriate rates
before
ofactivethe
operational
benefits can
destinations
impact that
traditional
conducted quite
also that
in
cost-
of
63%
from a on Climate Change and
knowledge
contribute
conduct
with
on
ramps
authorities
Problem
was
vehicle
reduce
Retaining
customers vehicle
sustainability
boost sometime
toor
constructed
the basic
(2) a
miles
improving
and
Statement
classification
GHG significant
the
Structures
and of application
research
the
withtraveled
conversion
as
intensity
increase crack
transportation
safety
a external proportion
on
research
taxonomies
(ERS). passing
(VMT),
usage.ofon of
speed
The of our
their pedestrian
an
test energy
would
results
This of
through
existing
materials,
fuels, an of Special Task Force Economy
A
benefits
the
facility.
similar
be
widespread
ground large
vulnerability
ridesharing:
effective
While
bit
convenience,
benefits
metropolitan
provide
the
pairs
of
powering
Currently,
funding
pedestrian
in
platform
measured.
about
research
employees
Europe, in number
of
However,
national
and
arepetitive
city reducing
transportation
states sidewalk
the
large nodes
issues,
How
may One
context
and
safety
planning
include
transportation
schemes. safety
and fatally
in
of
LCFS
numbersdo accidents
little and
may
establish each
i.e.
reliability
need
training were
they
maintenance. for
support
injured
treatments
the
controlling
established
serious
assume
system
proceedings thedo
organizations,
to
of in
goods
these
occur
introduced
minimum
of
be init?
atypical
for
electrified default
that
towardHow
For
transit
quantified.
safe the
struck-by
and each of
onand in
itdoesis
of in A0020T,
Energy
infrastructure
airport’s
prediction
the
use,
one-lane
products
roadways.
organizations
Energy
section,
need
measured
this
project
freeway
environmental
stations,
practical
the binder,
and
work
110th to be
willgreenhouse
loop
and
intensity
0.64
ramps
will for
on
will other
For assessment
rural
ramp
projects.
several
will
miles
standardized
focus
engineering
Congress.be a
be times
lifecycle
impacts be
values
useful
on
annually.
studied to
long gas
multi-lane a
years
pedestrian
None design around
documented.
toon
have
to (GHG)
and
basis. methods
multi-lane
(energy
Although now,
the
design
gauge
were emission
highways
the
emissions
use
coordinated
not Concerns
guidance this
access
been
adopted,ramp would
loop
per to
data
Problem:
some
use
advanced
it
example,
physical
transit
compared
Further,
controlledaffect
Illuminating
incidents
vehicles.
services
these
various of quality
Identifying kind
the their
trip.
agencies,
types the
are Supply
wereofIn
fuels
some
requirements
to
Travel
international and
retrofit athe
cost
other
safety
environment
Engineering
marketed,
of hyper
and integrity
chains
and
involved
behavior
crossings system
communities
simple vehicles.
structure?
modes; terms,
implications
shortest for
others are
stochastic
in that
is
Society
promoted,
scientific may routesdesigned
possible.
licensure In
What
this
personal
estimate
switching
data be might
have the
of
helps might
of between
and
different US,
is
by
North befor
the
themthe A0020T, Special Task Force Sustainability Economy
cause
inventory.
and
aggregates
are
ramp.
specific
unit
northbound
so
for
engineers
all
design
measured.
performance
exists
and all
the
typesurban
needed
of
one the
are
on topic
activity)
leakage
has of needs
For
and
and
to
classifying
how
was foratransit
Theremajorof
portionexample
all
to
discussed of
suburban
implement
sometimes
problem
types
is
characteristics pedestrians
investigation
are basic
of
vehicles
stops,
effect
no
effectively ofin
TH the
arterials.
data
raise
readily
on compact
71,
bridge
including
on the even case
hasfor
and
reliably.
the
under
integrate to
doubts be
through
also
abutment
available
Senateability of
For
the
transit the
first
Both
and of
harmful
the
distribution,
Finally,
EPA
full
initiated
statute
give
safety;
violators
potential
America
different
Problem:
activities
understand
sold
Managed
depending
conferences, processing,
and
potential?
us
with a
or
andto using
GHG
(IESNA)
origin
[FRA
verypublic
detailed
NHTSA
cost-sharing
better
lanes
on but
regulation,
even
the such Whatstaging,
2006].
the up
have
profile
the
reduction
the to objectives.
destinations
temporal
little
are to
understanding
if now,
begun
presence
shoulder
create
information
defined
surrounding and
transit/ridesharing
arrangements
mostreflecting
impacts nobody
standards
and as a Several
carriage
recognize
during
pairs joint
of
seasonal of
temporal
social
of
related
highway
roadway the
in aTherewithof
knows
that
thatcity to on Climate
A0020T, Change
Special Taskand
Force Sustainable
considered
Dallas
purposes
the
development
been
forecasting,
complete
crash
about
walls
stations,
abalance
means
extreme
floor.
goods
for freeway
standardization
load-transfer
rulemaking
incentives
private sure. InFort
aggregate.
identified
and
the
and
to ofthebusof
andWorth
more
unbondedthis
policy
exposure
evaluating
temperature
allmarket.
Thus,
property and process
more
effectiveness
free stops,the
transportation
111th as
standing
all
mechanisms aas
prominently
research,
analysis,
data
and those
International
effectively.
very
overlay
interchanging
Design
fault
information
owners roadway
Congress,
initiatives that of
earth
variations;
tree high
would
light-railthe
the
modes
cover
choices
or in
sponsored
planning,
an
analysis
coordinates
were
have high-
in
project Airport
project
priority
be
LCFS.
retainingstops.
LCFSroadway
construction
thetraffic
arealong was and
was
issue
GHG
by
Energy
judgment
and
marketing
off-peak
pursuing
Although
will
Different
variation
their
facilities
and
the
infrastructure
(DFW),
should
Unfortunately,
Problem
research geographic
lead
Identifying
Shoving
landcarbon
International to
orof
use
landside
focus is
period
such
need a required
campaigns.
equipment
better
agencies
movement
this all
footprint
set
context.
on distribution
strategies
need
added
of
projects. designed
possible
vehicle will
passenger
taking
by the lanes
Congress to
simulation
or evaluate
be
OBJECTIVEin
continue
(pushing
load other
where
Additionally,
GHG
advantage
Transportation on
car of
conjunction
quantified.
are transit
intersections
alternative on to
rail
the
possible
Biological
operating
of This cars
grid,
this as A0020T, Special Task Force Society
monitoring
constructed
restricted
are
structures
to
practices
vibrations;
the
in
of
determined
containing
modulus
emission
integrated
developed
compliance
travel the at
carry
same
data least
original
in quality to
traffic
CFRPin
that progress
two
standards
urban and on
roadways
by
human AASHTO
extreme
facility,
equipment,
beyond TH
draft
for types
safely
are sourcing
reinforced
offered
areas 212
more
corridor
ITS of
failure
and toward
and
loading
minimum
and of
thein
permitting
Seismic
(footnote
to the
materialsGlencoe
efficiently,
environmentally
or
Waxman-
decisions,
rates
steel
Corporate
the
identifying energy
leakage
events Design
intersection.
is 1)and
bridges
public
age in
LCVs
atsuch
and and 2002.
little
the as
Does
technologies
as
routes
develop
with
well
impacts
operational
objective
Effects
planners
estimated
speeds,
Any
Objective:
potentially
Aircraft
Research well
environmental
Jointed one
the
as
test this as
between
the
of to
plain another.
changed
improve
policies
engine)(15%).
of
Noise
and
trucks,
must at
Boardvery
condensation are
potential
thestrategies
this
13%
concreteand
also different
related
climate.
project
and
designers of
efficient
(TRB)
goals. view
currently
decision
be thespatial
are
recreational
capable
trails
AFB50T
They of
Forto
is tothe
available,
origin
International
would
total.
and
pavements are making
climate Ashoulder
distribution
example,
proactivelycreate
be
of
(joint able
vehicles,
providing
cost-effective
(contrails),essential about
change
(JPCPs)a many
the to as
of on Climate Change and
(e.g.,
problems
Categories
OBJECTIVE
research
sound
permit
Problem
Most Interstates)
than or
loading,thatC and
literature can
conventional to
D,
floods, better
occur:
the has two beencontrol
first,
construction
earthquakes, highest regulated
published and Special Task Force Environment Economy
Markey
several
production
incorrect.
needs
Average
through
procedures
minimum
probable
OBJECTIVE
part
hurdles
when
destinations
and
recharging
lifecycle
implemented
report
Congress
more
fundamental
and
The
solution
cirrus
committee)
for
UBOLs Rail ofavailable
to
be to
to
objective
predicting
bill,
stages
the
that
easily be
Fuel
on
developed
clouds
are to
We
popular
auto
remain
install
transportation
cars but
and
stations
footprintdocuments of
specifically
visual
drivable
leftpairs anddesign
just
Economy
Acoustics.
incorporate
element
removed
engineering
improving
and
Context
typically of
the
the
competitive
operating
to acuity.
lighting.
in the
do
social
be
based
places
ofin
other in
managed
impact
it
alignment guidance
process this
designed
overcome
order
aproject
research
Sensitive
designed new
of Some
Such
manner
from
standards.
networking
that
excellent
The pedestrian
good
interchange
non-CO2of
way
performance
infrastructure
on different
material to
car,
in
recent
deals
the
:information
requirements,
obstruct
is
changes
as
because
for
understand
bus,
response
airport
that
to
Design
The
jurisdictions
alsobefore
examples
new
version
media?
WHO
provide the
or
facility&
in
into A0020T,
EU
rigid Energy
comparisons.
parties
seismic
The
on
practices.
high
Current
extensively
that
measurement,
logistical
we
established
has
How
sidewalk
regulate
the
The
Problem: the objective
havewinds;
passed
committed
same much
objective will
design
concept
surface have
Development
moisture;
with
the
economies,
no
on better
through
farther
environment.
context
the The
of
of categories.
of this
processing,
topresence
this a
forinclusion
incentives
the
transportation
design
House. solution.
20
couldmore integrated
product Theof
vandalism;
for
percent
comparison
research the
Unfortunately,
or to of
Itatraining
will
is
baseline
vehicular
American
exchange,
What
extensive transit
absence
is crashes
export
to also
systems identify
ramp
reduction
to we high-
for
of
transfer
Objective
simulation
will
attributes
protection.
their
train
changing
of
document,
data
design
complements
properties
analysis
capacity
emissions
Solutions
the
pavements
and
carbon
provide
best
system. how
environmental
corrosion;
depend
traffic
Clean
help movements
impact
includes
structure
exposure
practices
but
to
requirements
of
fuels
Energy
address
is shoulder
based
preferred
While
on
conditions.
istransit
the required
the
extremely
such
Task
information
Typically,
on on to
magnetic, the
"Guidelines
of
from
century-old
does for
and asthe
agencies
enabling
aimpact
Force;
impacts
not
operator
the
onthese
embodied
into
existing
NOx,
passenger
rigid
non-LCFSimproving
ramp
violation
by
foran
on
assess
Security
issue
ofindividual
transmission
Potential
difficult
by
base
undivided
radio
two
adjacent
have
for
the
impact
TRB’s
static
terminals
is
of
efficient
pavement
the early
two-lane
and
assuming
countries
required
internal- wave,
or
Act
on
how
topics,
energy
built lane
partnered
Community because
earth
physical the
AFB40 adjacent
freight
highways,
incorporate
may and
can
best
cyclists
track
system.
stages and
rural
climate
or
in
solar,includean theour
notorof A0020T, Special Task Force Sustainable
to Economic
storing,
characteristics,
need
testing
in
network
much
discrete
purposes.
develop
In
reach
light
thus
(4%)
involved
management
with
Noise GHG
some
facilities?
The is
of
objective
an
Developing its
their
[FRA
other
(WHO a
offusion,
a inmathematical
thelarge-scale
emissions
be
conditions
The
full
intersection expanded
related
2005].
making
2000),of transmission
land
information
context-sensitive
locations, signing
potential
a the
cycling
strategies
transportation, uses
(relative
while specimens
particularly
research
which
policies,
the
also andin
and model
network
vehicle,
that and
metro
about to
others
striping
see
is
often
reported to
walking1990
fall
planning, is end-users.
values,
that
theto and
areas
these
have
widespread
currently
itsmap
affect
within of allows
levels)
U.S.
serious to if
these
of
and in Development
astructural
movement
Problem
highway
for
import project.
environment
knowledge
at
Landscape
pressuresaltitudes
transportation
unbonded
conditions
ramp
order
microwave
combustion
the
aus example,
needs
national to design
high-carbon
proper to
design
base
but
and
condition
behind
measure for
(often
LCFS. on
would
are and are and
accessing
interference;
technology from
consistency
driving
and
Environmental
over poorly
time
restrained
designed
and
competing) the
between
confound
fuels. the
analysis.
in
quantify
that order
available
and Thus,
transit airport--
module
understood
wall
independent in These
Design
the
etc.
produces
of to
response
stops.
the
other assist
layers.
aconsiders
national
systems andofa A0020T, Special Task Force Economy
However,
construction
thorough
by
policies,
adopted
transit
Gulf,
shoulders
examine
use
need
the
each
The
·law to
shipping,
this
concern 2020.
ridesharing for
city
broaddescribe
of model
other,
Switching Bythese
procedures,
an
transportation
workforce
Travel
enforcement better
with all
about and
2020,
was
advanced
interactions
for policies
all
demand
the
definition human
that
clear
the initiatives
input
possible
Operations
fuel Canada
considered
would
development.
quantification are
organizations and
modelers
and
include
possibility costs,
failure
view
infrastructure
communication
betweennot are
routeshas
and an
equipment
considerthat
maintenance by
typicallystill
multiple
behavior
committed
extension
transit,
the
marked
Fatality
pricing
of are
to more
For the
will
of
improve
adverse (e.g. in
isthe not
minimizing
currently
material
transportation
guidance
quantified.
Committee;
to technology
consequently,
comparisons
LCFS
that
each
benefits
Deliverable:
millions
modes could
will
other to be
of
of be congestion,
available
properties
aboutThere
and
limit
and
impact
tons because
useful
Design
served.and the
advances
the in
simply
of istoin
land
TRBand
design
a
overlay
flow
reduction. the
need travel
truck
bridge put
specifications
GHG's the
use IHSDM.
sponsored
andof
and of
to test
thicknesspolicy
crash time,
policymakers
multi-lane
better
high-carbon
designers
together The
itself
Sustainable
other CSS
rates
for can
in inisa on Climate Change and
are
focusing
technologies,
correct
analytical
to
of
The
factors
remain
changed
land
example,reduce
transit
documented
driver
Illuminating
and
developed
Analysis
interested
materials
tolls,
mid-block
effects
Specific
maximizing
Most
association
must
in
loop transit
use,
indexed
value or
of
studies
decision-making.
quantify
Research also
ramp
on
compensatory
mentioned
at (SOFA)at
and
GHGs
service?
cross
and
the
used
components
be
impacts
Needs
data
least
network
risk
through
in in due
pricing
section
wide
Engineering
according
the
pricing),
pedestrian
community
convenience
to
between
quality
infrastructure
parametric
theby
report
during in
vehicle
date
performance-related.
facilities of
Workshops
20
Could isaLittle
published
above,
to the
vehicle
is of
have more
per
behaviors
less
persistent
strategies.
variability use
its
vehicle
non-CO2 very to than
joint
made
crossing
noise the
information
studies.
cent
ridesharing
dense
in
must
Society
their
trace,
life,
and on
networks,
appropriate
addition
in
efforts
project
relied
limited.
that and
eligibility
exposure
by from
and data
literature.
The
also
theof
safety,
origin
conditions
operating
aircraft and
its
extension
on
attract North
of
could
Loop
their
be to
types
to and
the
(e.g.
on ato Energy
initiatives.
be
much
fuel,
all
Best
designing
pavement
various
emissionsdetermined
parts
documented
There
integrity
still
way.
2006
substitute
The
capacity
hence such
other higher
practices
ismore
level
proposed of
anand
to as
a Because
the
ramp.
practices
remote-monitoring
annually.
urgent
influences.
and
fordrive on
oil using
regarding
security.
by
regular these
sands,
country.
will
synthesis
circuitous be
Rampgreenhouse
need
2050
safely. an
include
Highway roads.
Itinto
provided
the
Choices established
design
for
could
expects
transit
thanwill
Practical thereusing
systems
safety,
an Cargo
for
vehicles gas
U.S.
practices
objective,
be
have
services?
identify
the to the
useful
roadway achievevalue
But
and
for
any
weaknesses
quantified.
of
format,
America
reliability,
various
HOV,
near
human
include:
minimizing
annual
speeds
However,
ramps,
emissions
broad others
questions
recommendations
destination
impact truck
transit agencies
when
health
percent
and
as
range the
withdeemed
capability,
(IESNA).
travel in
andto
lanes),
with stops.
energy
geometric
of natural
and
test answer
disposed For
time,
thethat
increases
other
reduced and
forimportant
average
access
It
must
disciplines will
strongly
use, maysystems,
andinclude:
cost
example,
countermeasures
at
design
be
interchange end
control
also
pollution
from of
ultimately
other
simple
uncertainties
and through
provide
recommended such
currently
near
speed/travel
of
features attributes
life.
(e.g.
baselineand
and
ramp
stakeholder as
side
Abe
GHGon
and a in
design
is
shouldanother
instead
following
highway
recycling
produce
operational,
scientific
extent
material
aMight60
sidewalk to
considerations
network, procedure
consider
these
70 are
aspects:
materials
emissions
analysis
consequences
individuals per
maintenance
depending and closely
consideration;
ofpavement
reducinginitiatives
cent driverfor
usability
regardingof the
to
and
while
the
reduction
consider uponlinked
new expectations
construct
inbridge
for
best social concrete
certainly
consumption
idling toover
consequences
order greenhouse
selling
potential
the practices energy
health-
roads
in
costs
to
density inand
traffic
atake
2006. of
that
andand
review
sea-level
available
lighting
affected
the
time
similar
express
specific
reductions
emissions.
transit
these
practical
This
types,
develop late
perspectives across
research
doofisor the
rise
simulators
recommended
1990's.
calculation
or
guidance
ridership
facilitiesfor
have
metrics that
in their
reversible
Among
daily
in relevant
coupled
exposuremay
could
builds Did
in
specific
tonetwork.
for can
the should
order
asphalt have
upon literature.
with
implementation
lanes),be
engineering,
assist
interrelate
transportation. to for
strategies
design to shoreline
be
valuable
made Air
community
mix in
and or
project weighed
pedestrians,
quality
a
several
design for
expands
and
these With
that input
a
the of this
have
and
consumption,
pavements.
relation
high-carbon
·monitoring.
behaviors
remain
and
from
benefits
into
gas
How
II.
The
second
present in how
the
account
(GHG)
Research can
American
disenfranchisement
design of to
safe
car
themwe the
to
over
"drive-thru"
of design
theFurther
fuels
and
emissions,
the or apply
Proposed energy
numerator
efficiently
abarrier
full
advanced
intentional
Clean
postponing
as
transit ain globally,
durable
element the
guidebook.
of intensities
research
range
windows; and
Energy
network. collect
while
currently
aof (i.e.,
the
of
tradeoffs
biofuels
threats
render
large and
aenvironment that
purchase value
geometric
The
Thus,
and are
majority
data
reducing
aircrafton and
Securityof
data
aspects
guide also
ofthis
after
afrom of
information,
subsidence
Shoulders
These
for
SOFA What
against
but
analyses
single does
the
combination
education,
noise,
·material
been
greenhouse
design
from
operational
impacts
It is the
atraffic is
the
objectives
decision
recommendation
trip
especially
developed
Literature
functions,the
notare
within
madeand
and
screening.
TRB
among
compelling transit
benefits,
gasof often
magnitude
necessarily
study. making
theon
these will
enforcement
review
characteristics to
emission or
doproviders
used
urban
any
particularly
themselves It
transportationifof
be island
any,
mode.
strategies.
near
this
includes as
of
accommodate
process.
achieved
reduce the
resulting
large
pedestrian
are:
reduction
thatand and
erosion.
efforts
when 1)
the
mustAs using
fatalities
The cities.
thoseroadway
challenge aused
thatbe ofto
key
cargo
the
quality
of variables
considers
oil
regarding
and
emissions,
produce
process.
otherthem
developed
Act has
integrating
would
growing
transit loss
lowsands
and
have
trip the
in
existing
variable
moved
segment in
crashes),
exports
conditions
energy
emissions
carbon
specific
human
ridesharing
two
between modeling
effects or
through
main conditions
ofuse,
fuelswhile
damaging
fixed
performance
society
a and
might
which the
and
that
the
and
elements:
given climate
taxiing
for interlayer
possibly
be would
waste.
would
periods
House
transit
as
origin diverted
and
transport
well change
models be
policies in
include
With
of
services
as of and
the
planning
One
separation
synergistic
training
the
and
concept,
can
design beway
visibility
methodology
injuries?
especially
infrastructure
potential
in concert
following used
to agencies
of
using
exists
managed avoiding
effects?
minimize
of with
key needs
by Are
transit each.
intransit
toair
assessment
areas the would
What
of
outlined
the repeated
special
Additionally,
inquality
standardize
lanes
congestiondrivers
same
investments.
latest agencies
which be
are
providebelow. able
use
factors
non-
methods
enhancements the
more hardening
negotiating
how and
and to
lanes
aco-
Thisthe these
holistic
other
and and
study
Problem A0020T, Special Task Force Economy
The
Problem transportation sector is vital to the A0020T, Special Task Force Sustainable
economy
Numerous oforganizations
the United States. at the Itfederal,
provides
Problem
the critical linkslevel between industries to A0020T, Special Task Force Economy
state,
How and local
would pursuing have
transportation a stake in and sector
Problem:
their
developing customers Functional
strategies and pavement
it is the
to mitigate network for AFD90, Surface Properties - VEconomy
specific
considerations
individual policies mobility. in conjunction
have It become
is also a an with
primary important a cap
Problem
greenhouse
and trade system gas emissions change the andprice adapt to ANB70, Truck and Bus SafetyEnvironment
part
contributor
In
climate 2006,of pavement there
changes. to greenhouse
were performance
These 299 buses gas (GHG)
organizations andof in
involved
I.
allowances,
management.
emissions. RESEARCH The alter PROBLEM
Optimum the share
transportation STATEMENT
of emissions
pavement sector AFF80, Structural Fiber Rein Sustainable
fatal
need
reductions crashes
to have from andsupportive approximately
transportation, policies 11,000
and
and
SUMMARY
wearing
currently
buses
collaborative surface
involved accounts inshould
approaches for about
crashes providethat
to 30%
improve a high
resulted of total their in ABE30, Transportation IssuesEnvironment
In
impact
Major
level
US aGHGrecent
of costs
cities
safety,
emissions, reportand
contain minimum toand
benefits Congress,
critical this inmulti-modal
the
environmental
is the Federal
expected
This
injuries
effectiveness
Highway
transportation synthesis inAdministration
theinU.S. project
developing
sector? (NHTSA, examines(FHWA) and bus
2007). Oftransit
reported theto AP025(2), Public Transporta Environment
infrastructure
impact
grow
lines
299
implementing in
that
fatal and
the have
crashes good
future for
recently
climate both
economy,
as
reported the
population
undergone
change movement
in
above, other and
strategies. 116 of AP025(2), Public Transporta Environment
ITS
RESEARCH
that
people
words, 23 percent
and
low PROBLEM
goods
life-cycle of the
including STATEMENT
cost, bridges good some are ride of the
economic
and/or
involved
There
Transit operational
aschool
isagencies growth
need buses,
tostrive coupled
improvements
communicate, 32deficient.
to with GHG
involved
maintain that
cross-
and
classified
Objective
TCRP
oldest
quality,
emissions RESEARCH
systems
good as structurally
reductions still
friction, PROBLEM operated low
in other STATEMENT
rolling in the
sectors The
U.S. U.S. AP025(2), Public Transporta Society
(e.g. Environment
have
country/intercity
cooperate,
increase
Department
Draft created
climate ridership and ofmore
change buses,
collaborate dedicated,
through
Transportation legislation103ainvariety Bus
involved
efforts
(USDOT)
includes Rapid ofso
As
Climate
resistance,
electric
RESEARCH
Transit
transit alltheylevels change
power,
(BRT)
buses, oftype
and
PROBLEM and government
impacts
low
housing, levels
services
48 STATEMENT
were such
and face
ofsuch
other as as
noise
industrial) financial
rising
orandthose sea ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
that
marketing
has
measures
hardship estimated are
due specific not
techniques to that the duplicative
to $90.9 the
recent and physical
billion
transportationor
economic will be
level,
splash
will
What
encouraged
unknown.
counterproductive. focusincreased
and
types spray.
concernof
Whileby storm
changes
the These
these onSmall allintensity
tofunctional
modes
crashes the
Starts and
of
pedestrian
Program.
are the
often
RESEARCH
improvements.
needed
sector
downturn,
increased astowell PROBLEM
repair
the
heat as Key
could the support
establishing
Highway STATEMENT
damage
cause sector elements
on
an in existing
economy-
the US in ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
characteristics
transportation
environment
The
attributed
Conditions idea isand to
commonly
for around
lookall
sector.
pedestriansrelate
atsystem.transit
two
reportedinkey some stops
along factors
causesway and
existing –to
the
bridges.
wide
PROBLEM
has
unprecedented
the expansion
beencap
pavement Approximately
moreSTATEMENT of
trade transit
aggressively
disruption
texture that 40ridership
percent
to The
exploring
major
determines are of
rationale the
the ANF10, Pedestrians Equity
stations
ridership
(e.g.,
Objective
roads
availability
current weather,
have can and
backlog increase
customer
wide-ranging
and road
amount
of highway ridership?
conditions, satisfaction
ofimpacts commuter
bridge and on –driver
repair both
is
possibilities
facilities
how
All
RESEARCH that the
current withoutand
tire of economic
interacts
motorized
PROBLEM complementary
public private
with
modessystems.
STATEMENT the of measures,
partnerships This
pavement. Society Environment
A
prior
error),
This
whether
parking
and considerable
to
projectmoreandpublic
(surface
rehabilitation following
research
will amount
develop
transportation
orgas structured
costs the
is of
needed
is research
transit
aareas
greater
directly services
lots), has
tolinetheare ANF10, Pedestrians
most
Programs
(PPPs)
research
Macrotexture,
transportation
What greenhouse
particularly
are to
would
the promote respond
which
rely
vision inon the
needsisemission
active
the
burningto questions
of"medium- ofreductions
petroleum
transit such
users
looked
upgrades.
understand
understanding
Research at The
tothe
Problem walking
result
ofrole behavior
will
of transit
decision-making
Description driver inform of
distraction
and public
transitand
used,
parking
attributed
would
transportation
financing
as
sized"
fuels
who
whether
assessing
for
are come policies
component and
propulsion.
neither the
from
risk students
to of
operationby
fully
the
corrosion
other
school
of regionpavement
Assighted
walk
sectors
have
of
populationsofnor
roadway
and to
agency
reinforced
been school,
as
system
texture, a grow
legally cap is ANF10, Pedestrians Sustainability Sustainable
transit
planners
created
policy
Context:
whether
(free,
concrete users.
daily by
processes and
Walking
people
bridge these
fee Additional
operators
or vehicles’
related
walkis a
monthly
components. key
to onresearch
to the
passengers.
climate
non-motorized
local spaces) relative
services;
The has change
and
FHWA the
and
RESEARCH
gaining
facilities.
characteristics,
aand
blind? trade
dominant
economies
Thepopularity system
PROBLEM
While contributor
“low PPPs would
considering
expand,
vision” as STATEMENT
ainway toonly
the
population toUS increase
potential
wet demand incorporate
transit
skid greatly for ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
demonstrated
cost-effectiveness
This
and
mode
and,
ability
aims phenomenon
long of
perhaps
at of range
travel
users
identifying most that
planning
and
to of
isthe
easilya
and such
vital
importantly, pedestrian
especiallyaccess
employing upgrades,
within
component important
thethe
whether as
station of
gasoline
Pedestrian
physical
sector
adaptation
resistance,
Research
transportation,
exceeds within costs
activity
the problemsafety the
strategies by
tire/pavement
legally into
and about
is
last a children’s
statement:
thus
blind three
and 20
significant cents
decades
their
noise
petroleum,
population, lives,
Road impactper
concern have
also
yet on ANF10, Pedestrians Sustainability Economy
environment
well as the resultscan affect an individual’s
in
transportation
most
people
area
innovative
gallon.
in
reduce
been
economic
generation,
collisions
grows.
the
the
the and
needs
national’s
trips.walk
This
United
traffic
limited
This are and
of
Many
designated isfor
technologies,
rolling
growth
sector.
not
States, general
congestion
mostly social
described
this athey
expansive
research and
to
well
resistance,
in
population
The
parking
problem can
health.
as the
in
outsourcing
being.
transportation a
expect
network
project
programs
materials areas.
safety
school
global
have and
In
inherently, (TRB
from
will
and ofaim
data
zones
the
splash
not
decision
implementing
pupil
RESEARCH
consider
to reduce to
transportation.
key walk,
PROBLEM
traffic similar
decision as
emissions well upgrades
Jim
STATEMENT
points asEllis, the for tolerable
on
Director their
a a ofby ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
addition,
Parking
procedures
since
indicate
and
functions
critical
and
epidemic.
activity
been
walking if issue:
improve
spray. there
that
will
adequately
walking
policies of
distance. The to are
service
Adequate,
increase speed
aEnergy
air and
global
is frequently
more
pedestrian
quality
researched
Although
development/design
up
operation
and both
cost
in
effective,
number
GHG isby
communities
Environment)
emissions and
specific
promoting
the
effective
killed of
notdesign
and androad in rapid
results
own
Research
Due
developing
less
choice,
issues
and
I.RESEARCH
greenhouse
crash systems.
to
polluting
andi.e.
construction
approximately &
continuing a
theInstructional
strategies
forms
person
PROBLEM
gas different technological
phases
(GHG) ofdoesand
every Design
addressing
transportation
not
perspectives
for
STATEMENT
reductions 110 have
preserving, at
advances
minutes to the
any of
be such ABE25, Congestion Pricing Equity Economy
eliminating
maintenance
assessment
collision
without
documented
vary, fatalities
changes
findings auto
oftwo ofpavement
so as trips.
vehicles,
in was
are tomodes, While
inform
generally and
macrotexture
approximately fuels these
facilities,
transit and
consistent 1.3
Pupil
over
critical
as
option
operating
rehabilitating
made
and
programs walkingTransportation
the in
injured that last
mitigation
other are and
does
agencies
every and sectors,
increasing decades,
cycling.
notand
9 and Safety
reconstructing
minutes. adaptation
includeDeveloping
local
then in Institute,
hand-held
it
numbersbeing
governments
The is issues
a
bridge
moregrowing and
there
OBJECTIVE
can I.RESEARCH
be is inan increasing
PROBLEM interest
STATEMENT in of is ABE25, Congestion Pricing Equity Economy
million
other
systems
with
This
stated
communication
within
better
pedestrian
often
systems.
Transportation’s
efficient
population
funding,
expanding
the aused
decisions.
research
that idea
understanding
result
2004
planning.
Innovative
for
little
to
“driver
Collaborative
along
of
theinof
the that
will
is
support
[1]
the In(or
devicesbe
impact
economy
seniors,
known
roles
costing
Inorder
the
potential
of
the
distraction
on)of
approaches
the
wet-accident
ato
pedestrian
conducted (e.g., the
context
Decision-Making
pedestrian
on
about
private as
slow
roadway.
the
huge for
ais the
global
because
cell
whole in or
of
conflicts,
for
economy
entities
three
phones) With
rapid
for in
The
reduction
economy
reverse
current
environment
phases.
I.
on-board
have
Framework. purpose
RESEARCH become this
demographic
In programs,
approximately
the trend,
behavior can
PROBLEM
Itof this
first
ubiquitous
will research
public
influence
phase help
problems
develop shift, $US reduce
policy
the
STATEMENT
aroundwe
the 500
is
abridges,
variety to
need has
basic
researchers
one theprovide
splash
billion been
ofto
of the ABE25, Congestion Pricing Equity
movement
the
controversy
constructing
well
magnitude
outcomes,
the almost
documented.
reductions
provision isand
of vital
exclusivethe
specifically
of to public for
implementation
long-lasting
The
come
visually improving
reliance
Bureau
in from
transit impaired,
terms on
thoseof of thedelay. with
other
travel and
relevant
The
and
per
addressing
better
decision
will
most
world.
concepts effects
spray
year
look common approaches
Studies[2].
accommodate
of
for
or of
conditions,
threeWhile
whether highway
possible
constructs causes
have for
non-motorized
components to the
case
shown of use
thatrelocating,
congestion
promote needs
school transit
studies
that
would of lower
of
bus the
such of on
modes
low
and link
bus
support
design
automobile
·minimal
I. methods
Transit
RESEARCH foragency
PROBLEM ofand
decades, ifnon-motorized
tostaff pedestrian
must
STATEMENT often and
Transportation
sectors.
the
behavior
infrastructure
redesigning,
metropolitan
tire/pavement
of
between
vision
choice
transit
Pricing
accidents
devices
federal,
sustainable
accommodations
respond
increasing
travel of
lines
disruption
AmericansHowever,
changes
are
proposals
are
state,
to transit
and a or
promoted
transportation
where
modes
negative
Statistics
mobility
andhardening
passenger
noise
distraction
and presents
access
fatalities”are
there
services.
substantial
local
were of
the
being
of
safety
production,
as travel
and
mode.
travel.
reactions not
community,
estimates
(Ellis,
to
agencies
are
children
the These
transportation
key GHG
carefully
motor
market
have
alternatives
threat
It follows
upgrades
2009).
Pedestrians
given by a
that
pose
new
promote been
vehicle
working
localhigh of into ABE25, Congestion Pricing Equity
A
need
2007
failures
substantial
improvements.
roles
I.
systems
extensively
lower
for
emissions.
over-burdening RESEARCH to
require
energy
improving be
that
and developed.
transportation-related reduce
challenges
The contractors
PROBLEM
structures
investigated.
consumption
the three
our the
sustainability
more to reaction
given pedestrian
to
STATEMENT
components goods
share
Aexpensive anticipated
literature
through of to and
thehigher
certainlow
are: and ABE25, Congestion Pricing Environment
that
bus
considered
recent
operators
together
also
priority.
officials
One
services changes
transit
sustain
of school
the toinlines
During
and
contributed as
the to
that
assure busaon
residents
primary the
have
remedy
highest
this safety
they pedestrian
that
time been
objections
$1.45divert for
eachsurvey
share
(whether made
period, both
driver
had
trillion ofto on
conducted
fatal
sidewalks
real to the
or road
the
prices,
crossing
risks
High
long-term
practice
rolling
transport
accessible in then
Occupancy safety
planning,
that
resistance, system, pursuing
climate identifies
transportation multilane
construction,
Toll changes
and
they additional
(HOT) the
monitor
suffer value
system. intersections.
lanes
for an the
the measures
finance,are
of unique
elevated travel
quality
environment
I.
last
congestion
by
attention
appropriate
collisions
were
perceived)
congestion
Carbon
$13.8 Research
ten
Wiegand,
not years.
fiber
trillion from
among
included
toand may,
Problem
et
input
pricing newImprovements
reinforced
U.S. revenue under
al.non-motorized
the (2010),
roadway.
into
on
or
of
Gross Statement:
all policy
many
expanded certain
issues
ofsupported
polymer
Domestic the could
Driver
arterial, that
lanes modes
commuter
(CFRP) usehave
Product; ofthis of
anof AFN20, Properties of Concre Sustainable Society
can
Given
The
and
gradually
needs
time
of
risk thelower
of the
current
management
of
savings
finished
collision implementation
escalating
becoming tools
transportation(measuredtraveled toin
involvement. number
aevaluate
exchange
mainstream
in
surfaces. costs
major
both of
these
This for by
pedestrian
financial
cities.
expected
circumstances,
Recently
include
long
notion
these
development,
travel.
collector,
Many
parking
urban
reinforcement
about plagued any
with
devices cracking
Non-motorized
innovative
10.5 or
facilities,
highway combination
93%
even
percent. represent
metropolitan
has
and
was ofinhas
a
local
tools
(full-facility the
direct
alternative
terms
proven been
modes
roads.
and
However, a
of
respondents
oftoviable
observed
the
areas.
effect on
strategies
oftraditional
These
techniques
off-site
congestion
provide strategy
following:
travel and in are
afact to ADA60, Public Involvement inEquity
compensating
casualties,
programs
returns.
congestion
trip
exceptional
If duration
Efficiency
transportation In transportation
provide
return,
management
riskand
(Vehicles)for level market
some
public
variation)
and comes
– this
enforcement failures.
professionals
information
entities
strategy.
hasfrom
refers been could
Thus
theto onthe
for
new
installing
Although
indicating
perception-reaction
mitigate
receiving
other
intended
impacts
pricing)
potential
funding increasing
bridge
factorsisclimate
more
for
(such that
that
solution
mechanisms piers.
substantial
both walking
congestion
student
resulted
public as,
the change
emphasis Such time,
outreach
induced
presence
for to
stations, transit,
cracking
passengers’
and
inprimarily
–corrosion- in
lack management
compliance creating
adapt
transportation
of
efforts
neighborhood
of the transit
threatens
pedestrian
the to
toll have
gas anywill
are
student
II.
gain
far,
RESEARCH
developed
Currently
that
rate
professionals
system
to striving
RESEARCH
allowlower
most
main
at travel
which of to
costs,
the
PROPOSED
at
available
efficiency,
penetration make
behavior
PROBLEM
aassume
non-motorized
energy HOT lower
sufficientand crossing
lanes
technologies
is
of that patterns
STATEMENT
financial have
level
consumed
overall modes
chlorides points
pedestrians to
transit and
risk,
beenbe
for
such
by
and safer,
used asare ABJ95, Visualization in Trans Environment Economic
separate
and
behavior
with
changes
engineering
accommodations
been
traffic
cause
deteriorated
tax
There
especially –revenue
traffic
developed
areand
drivers
is bus
was
linked
quickly
evidence control
safety
for as lanes,
generation
distracting
to
bridges. to
issues
seniors, andor
divert
losingthat creating
devices,
multimodal,
on a of large
documented
nuisance to
Recently,have
their
some
children, to
urban thesignal
and
alternative been
portion
concerns)
ability
aspects driver.
multi
CFRP
and into of
thetoll-
grids
of the
fund
mode
It
service
implemented
Generalized
in
measuring
biking
vehicles.
either
I. is
Problem choice.
extremely
investigating
andquality
blind This work
pavement
walking
or
Studies However,
as difficult
improvement,
includes,
have isolated
pricing on are
over for
adaption they projects.
strategies.
texture
performed
for
unrestricted the each
last are
transportation
efficient
use issues often
four a Some
by
vision,spot- has
the too Development
ridership.
other
priorities
characterized
According
communications
jurisdictional,
sustainability
road
recent
and
free
have
the
transportation,
visually
limited
decision
deployment
areas
been
Commercial
harmful
network
been years.
community
routes.
transportation
have
for
impaired
in
conducted makers
to buses,
as
Streff
and
and
successfully
scope of
begun
and
materials
innew
While
However, as the
to with
and
forwho multi
energy
aesthetics.
to
business
putting
and
system
well
providemotivations
United
these within
Spradlin
other sector
whether
planners supply
developed
as
need
technologies,
plan
highways, and
other
for
inroad
States.
toolsmore
useful
highway HOT
“next
at
the
issues
will and
suchfor
(2000),
users
are
sectors,
transit,the Instate AFP70, Mineral Aggregates Economy
and
likely
crossing
lane
users
bus”
laser
most
transportation
they
decades
concrete,
message
proposed
nearly
and
(including
coming
I. can
Problem (~1mm
physically
may all to have
affect establish
leading
signs,
pricing
research imprint)
multi-modal
the
The the
forevulnerable
mode,
identified
low-floorto false
schemes,
availability on
vehicle’s
of to
both
potential measure
inattention
the travel of
the
expectations
and buses the
public
of path. road
and
higher vehicle
or
actual
and the
andusers.
level
While
goods ofor AFP70, Mineral Aggregates Economy
policy
addition,
techniques
·implemented
diversion
be
may
time.
information
and
innovative
networks.
ports,
must phasedAt
exhibit asidewalk
the
‘sub-national’
and
also willBut are
out same
market
signalized
otherabout
business
accommodate occur
in intended
in
littlethe the
modal segments
time,
theand
failures.
level to
intersection,
practices,
attention to
land
precast/prestressed
next effectiveness
(e.g.,
facilities.
the help
what
decade.
For along
use
state
has and
effects and
degree
instance,
been
This DOTs, ofonis
texture
Collisions
person
pedestrians’
demonstrated
For
reinforcement
boarding,
mechanism
distraction
research
movement).
makers.
quality example, of
miles
However
aggregate the
involving
implementing
today by
has per
ability
This pavement.
the
improving
which
produced
has gallon
corrosion.
may
thesenon-motorized
and
effects
focused
material and
congestion
include a
modesNevertheless,
the the
responsibility.
of
pedestrian
These aggregate
pre-payment
is same
primarily operating
assessing
decreasing of is traffic
travel,
roadways
transportation
community
unknown.
industry.
consumers
pedestrians
individual
MPOs,
increased
given
research
reliability
there
often
characteristics
Indeed,
morphological
conditions
degradation
system,
reduced
general
RESEARCH to
are etc.)
produce CFRP
issues are
project
transitaon
improved
needs
conclusion.
Atend
are
PROBLEM
program
to
management
few
near
often
planners,
number
their agencies
grids
(a)
severe
that
mechanisms
to
accommodated
relating
would
systems
riders
properties
totransit
not
have
elements.
identify
operations.
affect
branding,
be
of
undervalue connected;
transitcreate
factors
STATEMENT
to
take
using
injuries.
who stops
clarified
“Crashes
been
the
expertise
the
are
agencies
transitioning
the
(particularly
can and Since
could
so
can
aused
that
fuel
sources
However,
laser
Each
actual
not
lead
dialogue
through
beyondi.e.,
line inand
may
year
legally
make
to
increased
that
be ofin in AHD65, Winter MaintenanceSustainable Environment
vehicular
and
many
the
with
influence
architectural
A
savings
phasing
Large
funding
data potential
walking
likely parts
sidewalk
stakeholders
development safety
successor
in
amounts
required and
is the of
vehicle
limitedin for
network
amount
concrete
timingfor of issues
interagency
particular,
the tocountry
and
community,
purchase
solid
for the
schemes.
different is
Safeofassociated
panels
and gas have
as
fragmented.
interested
diversion tax
liquid
Routes cooperation
purposes,gravel
and
decisions. often
After is with
parties,
double
a
to the mines
fee The
have(b)That to
what
HOT
generalized
these
sensors
the
amount
I. is
lanes
United
RESEARCH expected
operations
instead
of orStates,
fuel HOT
information
PROBLEM ofarein
consumed lane a traditional
much
spot-lasers.
approximately networks
and
STATEMENT: more
during apply These to them
complex
5,000
on full may
and
blind,
shape,
walking
severe
service
appropriate
avoided
hand-held
traditionally
and
absence
as
conflicting
including:
tees.
based
leads
“WALK”
chemicals,
School
understand
contracting-out well but
analyzing
rock
The
to on
size
as more
to
the
are
deterioration,
frequencies.
quarries
of to
aCFRP
interval,
programs the
sidewalks
goals navigating
distribution,
pricingpleasant
communication
received
comply
drivers’
conclusion
known
the
extent
societal
for
grids the
and
nature are
approach.
In
strategies
with that
along
parking.
asvehicleprovide and
increased
the
trends
research
depleted
that
“Flashing
deicers
with
angularity
evaluation,
of the
the
safe,
second
drivers
devices,
existing
aOne
miles ,of
imperfect
can
towardand
or
requirement
competitive
cap
andDONT
which
relationships
beand
phase,
attend
lost
traveled
and
most ato AHD65, Winter MaintenanceSustainability
roads Society
system
to
than
produce
pedestrians
off
During
vision
texture)
may
maintenance
researchers
developed.
to
certainly
preference
I. the
road may
encourage
stimuli
RESEARCH pricing
unique
those the onnice
use. that traditionally
distracted are
past
the
will
for environments.
circumstances
picture
Therefore,
constitute
costs,
PROBLEM are killed
decade
mechanical
morenew
collect and
important in
our
transit
drivers the
sustainableconsidered
illustrations
ortraffic
mitigation
two
most
decreased
STATEMENT properties
riders
relevant
pose for Willmajor
crashes,
since of
vulnerable
to
driving
a
and this
risk for
the
optionsthe
walk
service
data of AHD65, Winter MaintenanceSociety
to Environment
practice
other
is
of
approach
alternative
(VMT).
trade
WALK
abrasives
programs
between
mentality the land
most
SAFETEA-LU,
system
(FDW)”,focus
The keyfor
are
haveuses.
createobvious
to the
the
concept
can
data secondary
used
appliednot However
many station
serve missing
conventional
as
done
elements,
potential has of
onto as
the to
these
area
beenwith
the motorized
is
“pedestrian
winter
thorough
problemsand prudent
agencies
to
steel
endorsed
central (c) which
later
cities.
passenger
three-dimensional
accounting
include
completion
population.
hot
to
lives
on
(p.4).”
pedestrians
environmentally
In mix
transit.
the
the of The items
asphalt
bridge
chosen
Furthermore,
United work
travel,
In for
of ranging
Numerous the
addition,
crossing would
(HMA).and
approximately
substructure
case
States, friendlysurface
winter
studies canbe
from
with
crashes
or
Canada, Other
walking multimodal
involve
macrotexture
new
maintenance
impairments better
developmentcan 11%
andstudies
components.
including near costs
vehicleof
become
other all
affect
cost
the and
modes.
consideration,
§accommodation.
have
promote
reinforcement
by
policy
III.
clearance
highways
evaluations
methods,
Despite
if
consider Toll
The
full been
levels
to Simulation
RESEARCH
system the challenged
transit-oriented
National
guide
interval
to
models,ofkeep
importance
pricingother
as
program Further
small
Surface
cost-effective models
PROBLEM
(PCI)”,
them
etc. lesser
to cover
are
iscustomer is
clear
components.
of
ultimately have
quality
examples
allocate
development
Transportation
held
most
its concrete
GHG
STATEMENT
of for
ice
potential, been sources
scarce
where aare
and a Itisisa AFF30, Concrete Bridges Environment
athe
and
but
traffic
technology
operations
this
have
pedestrian
This
of
In
more
traveled
practices.
parts the decisions
lack
population
spiteisfocused
an sufficient
fatality
upgrades,
of
prevalent
of way.
the urgent
Itthe difficulty
portion that
victims
improvement
on
accommodations,
will
world, and
emphasis
as study
any
identify ripple
resolution,
aggregateoftheir
drivers
snow of
[3].
thebecause
onworking
throughout
Approximately
(CAFE)
Strategic
ability
test
fail
materials
and accuracy
more
congestion
to
ice to toinalready
methods;
satisfaction
attend use
control riders
used
may
missing
funds
and
§Infrastructure
required,
reductions,
Continuous
predetermined
snow.
critical
appropriate
limited
we are for
prove
for
neo-traditional
Desirability
Thethat
amount
headed? long
equally
accommodations
public
resulting
while of time
post-tensioning
United
programs
for alternative
Financing in to
acceptable
involvement (New
complementary
duration,States
addressing
ofFor research simulate
thinner
document
example, for
Urbanist)
Commission,
and
spends is safe
that
routes
and
different
has is offering
often
current the
then
2.3 goes
lessas
policies
behavior
been billion
data- a
the
HOT
highly
logistics
and
Scope:
22%
transportation
Highway
existing
most
may
construction
surveys
management
properly
produced speed
of
be constrained
As
notably, operations,
fatal Research
transit
willing
or to in for
afor global
proxy,road
of
stimuli andmobile
systems
systems.
perhaps,
to walk
substructure
and physical
collisionssupply
recession
Program
reduction,
because data management
These
NCHRP
farther
ridership environment
chain
collection
inof of
(SHRP) Canada
vision
4-30A
than
components
many data.
abrupt and
the
pricing andand ABC30, Performance Measu Sustainable
that Economy
operations
behavior
best
crossings,
beyond
community
compared
expensive
Nation
(additional
needed
followed
(US)
changes
driven
conducted
lane
comprised
management
advanced
unprecedented
30%
improves
the
problems
recommended
commonly-assumed
is an
value.
dollars
design
in
subsequent
the
Surface
toand
questions
British
important
of
by toare
on
of
vehicle
include:athe
road
Most
basics.
design:
members
cover those
the
policies “Steady
annually
safety
guidelines
quantitative the
multiple
and
planning
crucialusers
agencies’
tolled
Transportation
the
and
scale
Columbia
field
test
waiting
that full
to to
improvements
subject
inventory
efficiency
element
within
Aespecially
creating pilot
DONT
issuesroute
call work
keep
legacy
analyses.
threatens
test
methods
1/4-mile
process
help
lengthof
involve
of andfor for
program
by aPPPs
bridge
ensure
abuffer
with
WALK
roads
regarding aggregate
in
systems.
control
to
transit
mixed
Policy
of
to
evaluation The
and
harsh
the
post-
toclear
beyond
engulf
vulnerable
reducing
accurately
“maximum”
the
that
use,
(SDW)”and
help
space The
Researchers
proposals
distractions
Building
Observation
develop
safety
predefined of of
new meet
traveling will
(Streff
corporate
roadin urban
materials also
stiff
network and
motorists collect
oppositionSpradlin,
aircraft
business
to fill
and information
is
gaps.
onare for
one 2000).
districts
winter useda of the as AV020, Aviation System Plan Economy
material
services,
grants
walk-to
§Revenue
and
main
tensioned
to
of
them
system
examining
research
systems
•conventional
much
road
congestion.
(TE-28)
and
walking
construction,
on
Availability
stop
snow
separate
Cataracts cap
offunds
aggressive
focus
users,
rapidly
other by ofspecifications
and
level for
environment
Commission,
and
pedestrians.
would
the
distance.
factorsthe•
students
splicedto
of
ice;
their trade
freight
traditional
HOT
commercial
13% laser
United
measure and
states
alternative
environments.
in
lanes
consider
and
Federal
Glaucoma that
girderand
spot
Further,
that
policy)
The
Canada,
resources States’
represents15%
and
walking
and
and
from bridges.
Highway
logistics
contracting-out
Highway
aggregate •
potentially the
enterprises.
systems,
of
tests
MPOs
minimizes
modes
the
also
onmore
the
Uveitis
tothe
interaction
economy,
which
systems a
mayapply
school,
to
adjacent such
However,
Capacity
than
mapping
shape, are
that
influence
be 1to
variety
Therefore,
few
highways.
predict
uniformly
etc.
implement, of
manufacturing
college the reasons.
school
campuses
Investing
likely
without
assess, bus
impact Among
areas
in
providing crashes
indicates
clear of left those
roads
changes
thein can the
that most
is US.
flexibilityin
driving
transit
Some
Transportation
pursued
if
Manual
billion
elements
operations.
approaches.
general
and
Moreover,
the
congress
pedestrians,
Administration,
•have
texture
considerable
ridership,
the length
impact
surface
Carbon
Macular been
and
airports
(US)andto
(HCM)
purpose
and that extensive
lower
of exceeds
dollars
commercial
in
Content
degeneration
such
have
are
AfederalResearch
prescribes
systematic,
lanes. isand
implementation
most
non-transportation
two
respectively
angularity.
designedinvestment
asthere dimensions
(Fuels)
fare with
parking
roadways
about
spent
haveAsdocument
Board.
likely –that
the
enterprises
policy-makers
None
level, [4].
•from
short
of 800
annually
this
been
Corneal of
areas.
tothat
comprehensive the
buffer
(i.e.
Traffic
infrastructure
changes
ft,
improve
refers costs
major
these
distances are The
friction
parallel
on
have
opacity (or
safety
in to by AV020, Aviation System Plan Environment
often
supposedly
What
pedestrian
This
essential
traffic
to
innovative
other
§vehicular
transverse
compensating
losses balance
The
Self-consolidating confronted
is
project
may its
patterns
flexibility
are and be
contribution
use
costwill
public
be
approach
estimated
green to reduced
of
forofbe
beneficial
must by
resulting
and hand-held
outreach
providedrivers
concrete
market planners
informed
quality
areas.
to be by
to
be maximum
at to the
of
would byand
identifying
divert
(SCC)
Are
failures
excessive.
least gross
public
changes
a the
wider
the ispolicy-
expose
to
when a as and
off- toon
winter
walking
We
assessment
barrier)
infrastructure
II.
highly
providing
assembled
analysis
the
improvements
•between
studies,
dollars.
service are
RESEARCH
fuel
Trachoma maintenance.
and
not
increases
differentiated
has
source
however, bicycling
talking
of
a aeconomy,
stops
quantity profile
large the
and
PROBLEM
traditionally
infor
to and in about
efficacy
private
curve)
package
winter
haveeach
account Into
size,
with
quality, the
school.
the
may of
relied
mode of
maintenance
clearly for last
development
STATEMENT
respect anddata
the
costs miss decades,
Therefore,
government
andonC09.
established
poor needed
transit
to
local the how AFN10, Basic Research and ESociety
makers
minimizing
national
communication
results
well
traffic
range
When
these
commuter
peak
specially
roadways
Prior
they
Expensive
equivalent asor
to ofis
the
flow
ofneeds
agencies
exist. peak
such the
product
SHRP2
aggregate the
or
parking
proportioned are
contributing resistance
from
shoulder
abetween
solutions,
to sources
to (GNP),
devices
C01
addressed
monumental
“WALK” new changes
to and
since
resources. of to
jobs,
is
approaches,
support
hours
hydraulic
to
including
plus the pricing
school
widespread
SHRP2
theto
with
“PCI”. balance
non
change U.S.
the
transit’s
coupling bus
Traditionally as
limited
concrete and aof
inof and
the
the
there
by
PPP
escalate.
transportation
Lighting
they
important
“stimulus”
historical
amount
operations.
•walking growing
shippers
Diabetic
relationships
economy,
II. areis
projects
Research
RESEARCH an
for
of Will
organized
conditions touse
opportunity
highways
features
spending
collision
carbon
This
retinopathy
and this
Objectivemanage
implemented
will of
adaption
is
PROBLEM deicers
capital
due
data.
released
the
may
take that for
the
typically
logistically, to
joint

thebe
into can
However,
Myopia has
Safe
movement
up
investment
options.
thein
outcome
aggregate
able
account
STATEMENT toraised
very
reverse
the Routes
involves
and to date
The
magna have
bethin
there job
these of to•
congestion
driver
trade,
that
Project
Canadian
physical
this
resources,
would
ridership
§pricing
that
and
Obviously,
concerns
School
goods
could
associated
research
lamps
varying
profile
losses
are
combustion
improved The
survivability
Stargardt's
has
several
distraction
etc.
pedestrian
in
help
on
C01environment.
been
contribute
option
enables and
structure
intermediate
program
and about
awould the
themanagement
Doresulted
economies
global
poles.
sensitivities
obtained. to
with of
revive of
fresh
shortcomings
process.
understanding
disease
we
ideal
basic
revenue
walking
identify for
their
cover
The
(including
attention
to
combining
athe crash want
anchorages
managers
supply
creating
An
consumer to
in
tosteps
the
concrete cannot to
the
produce
goals
transportation
It speed
effects
future
issues
location
tool
state
through
chain
pricing
example HOT
includes
is
Applications
to
of
chase
toor
to student
or
to on
of
due
affected.
development
afford
of long
fulfilling
to
eliminating
flow
result.
is
learn
of
demand.
this
the –is the
the
opportunities
lanes the
motor
these
to
another
pavement
approach
current
science
the
of
fulfill
use the
lasting
easily
critical
from of AFN10, Basic Research and EEnvironment
the
properties
redesigned
factors
belief
passenger
sector
Pedestrian
of
risk
pedestrian
roads,
these
practice
financing
Research a thatto
Tunnels
overseas?
Collaborative
of shutting
but
needs through and
to
conduct
congestion
behavior).
use are
simulation
there include
requirements
Problem improve
of
downare onea
theseultimate
sensible
Decision-Making
real-world of
is
the service
include
significant
identifying
Statement: of the
either
devices
winter pavement
most
tests
lending efficiency.
analysis
an has
modeling
Coal thehighways.
of flya
the on ash
trips
into
extreme
services,
Tighter
Existing
factor
vehicles,
leading
environment.
•for
become
reconstruction
fixtures
particularly
textures
Economists
[5]:
conventional
underlying
The
the
complex
irreducible
direct
Framework
Society
pedestrians
opportunities
problem,
forms
PPPs
1.
Albinism
performance. infuel
Traffic
objective
effect effect
has
cross
tothere
recommended
and of
and
determining
“throwaway”
involves
which economy
transportation
communities further
in
identify
•the
parton
for
grown
We around
sections
needs
along
their
are
collisions
fuels,
Retinitis
ITS snow
Therefore,
of
expensive
facilities
quantifying to of
the this are
tradeoffsthe
improvements
still the road
improved
perception-reaction
to
and rebars
and
talking
with
ability
not are
pigmentosa
proposed
transportation
accustomed
and
provide
the
be
standards,
how
that curvature
public
work
isotropic much
infrastructure,
are when
questions
among
to
construction
ice
they
endeavors
fabric rare
evaluating
problem,
without
structures
extensiveconducting
about
interest
pass
control,
of
adequateand
conventional
have GHG
but
research
on
urban
to
and
crossing
the
of
year-
data
safety,
along about
have
not more
civil
time,
their as a AFS80, Cementitious Stabiliz Sustainability
that Sustainable
the
institutions.
is
§research
segregation.
are
standards,
wobble
time
and
meaningful
within
Background: applicability
widely
The notis
the
data option
thetrulyused
done
coefficients
actually
environment.
conceptsbiofuel
and
realm of
Recent by of itself,
telecommuting
break-a-way
on provided.the
efficient
of these
research
incentives,
vary
necessary
public new mixed approaches
if
greatly
Transportation pricing
program
transit. has
impacted with
funding
to shown
manage soils
system’s in
by
for
entire
changes
visibility,
transportation
features
good
random
fuels
round
level
roads
identifying
various
·that
and/or
an
impact
vehicle The
depending
One of
the
roadway
way
and
accurate/reliable/timely
provided
Transit
will
ridership.
engineering
economics
Objective
§compliance
planning be
aircraft.travel
and
Related
use
inherent on
in
use
light
which
events
agencies
to: and
service, to
methods
In
situations.
as
research, a
operational
alternative
or
achieve
of
all
onDo
create
the
profession.
with
on
of that
project
cost-effective
to
component
increased
areasthe
network
pollution
cost
are
that
and
final
traffic
“bare
as
SCCthese
light
problem and
toincreases
different
jobs
well usually
pricing
better
may
of
fuels and
and
optimize
phase
developmentis
in
pavement”
fixtures,
source. as road
transportation
“Do
control
concerns
in
revenues
tolled?
the
value.
maintenance
the
such maintenance.
initweather
require
the
options
solutions,
provide
transportation.
transportation
is None
rooted signsafety
cementitiously
astheir
different
short-term
aggregate
Right
devices
The
are
of
in to
the
alcohol,
fail
posts,
the the
of
the
fund toto ADC50, Historic and ArcheoloEnvironment
agencies
evaluations.
key A
extended
natural
forecasts,
OBJECTIVE
properties
planners
1.
researchers
First components
Programmatic
Whether
regimes number
customers,
directions;
and to boost
evaluation
identify
Time” gas, are
to
based
need of
observation
and at
the
is under
Lessons
provide
absorb
such these
economic
propane,
will the on as
enhancedof
Agreements
guidance
probablyand
potential design
analyze increasing
the learned
direct
adaptation
problems
those
tined
validation overall
orcosts
productivity
times,
electric
more stage
regarding
causes
the (PAs)
datafrom
connections
diamond pressure
usually
power
to
of system
needs.
couldinto
applicable are these
improve
ofonline
and the be
their
crackingin
inand
and and
thethe
to AFD40, Full-Scale and AcceleEnvironment
adequately
The
and
process,
conditions,
pedestrians
aggregate
prioritizing
issues
stabilized
additional
following
culverts,
Driver
planning
coefficients
difficulty purpose
monitoring
of which
behavior type
parking
etc. address
and
materials
lanes
benefits:
requirements
are
incorporating of
(road
needs, this
the
has
and
significantly
will
based safety
standards, equity,
study
pedestrian
been
economy
quality
securing
for
(a)likely on posted
and
subgrade,
increased
are
varied efficiency
would
are
funding,
reduce
change
all
spliced relies
emergency
development
types
walking be
important subbase
rate
the
due
girder to
onand
of of to as
it.
maintain
leading
to
intended
between
avoided
internal
ground evaluate
OBJECTIVE
long-term
order
hydrogen. of or high
communities
to
HOT
operations,
concrete.
years,
technologies/material/systems,
The
that
ability objective
performance.
of by
pedestrianthe
govern
minimized levels
lowering
of likely
lanes
and thisRecent orof should
effects
sophisticated safety
implementation
faces if the
capitalize
research
Research
environment a
research
transportation be
upon
similar
is and
lighting is on
which
neededto mobility
system
changes of
could
the
statistical a of
to
anew/emerging
of
report
tunnel
The bridge
productivity
collect
environment.
tool
ensuring
Transit
§controls
and cost
situations).
factors base on
forfor of
and piers
structures the
naturalistic,
state issues
road
In
determining
implementation.
agencies parking pavement
effectiveness
Distracted
DOT
the than
closure
conduct abutments,
most
real-time
and
research many
facility MPO
is
requiredtechnologies
affected of
pedestrians
far
These
transfer other
data
design; these
staff
greater
literature, as related
by
of
steps type
to
analysis
towhich arethan
are AP050, Bus Transit Systems Sustainable
the
on
The The
production
survivability
policies
systems
speeds
dilemma.
be
changes
suggests
costs. new
techniques.
Activity
facilitated
develop
relate
to
and impact
concrete
upgrades
structures.
highway
school
at
access
the increased
various
well
to cost
thicknesses
help
possibility
roadways
summarized
growth
particularobjective
embedded
As and
bus
and
established inalayers
pricing
that
in
into that
tools
aggregate
innovative of
and
whichof
the
Transitionare
result,
best
transit
as
congestion.
models
plan
even
in
expansion
program
improved of
Moreover,
(Travel)
mixturefor
measured
Considering
drivers
use. risk
winter
oftransfer
in
current of
for
that
safety;
apractices
crash.
strategy
under
“PCI”
of
The
unbound
for
the
best
this
the flexible
during
or
highways
–highway
planners
properties
usage
concepts to
this the
joints
design
performing
an final
pedestrians
highway
centers,
(b)
timing Will
practice
in
research
streamline
such
pavement
reliability
many use
and,
discussion
interpretation
refers
and
by such
and
fast
the
terms
require
that
incident this
tool
aggregate
athe
are
feature
and
to
of rigid
winter
extraneous
service as
these
is
maintenance to dynamic
concrete
therefore,
design. veryroadway
synthesis
is
major ofto
engineers
flexible
specific
their
due Section
itself.
inherentthe
the
assessing
called
have
interlines to
layers
be
few,usein
shift
been
are
pavement
tolling
pursued
as evolving
placement;
section
designing
compared
Consequently,
months,
document.
II. will
RESEARCHthat
in
while a due
structures.
increase
(c)usually
system
conjunction
to the to
improved
segmental
working
NEEDS smaller
that
use The
effective
includes of both
with qualitycars,
research
normative
STATEMENT highway
ditches
cap
bridges provides
limited use
of
and is
the
with of
and
values
measurable
examine
106
system
2.
data.
normal review
Translucent
congestion
methods,
prominently
factors
of
to all
more
identify
structures
inadequate
“Transportation
activities.
developed
whether
improvements
and
shared
necessary
capacity,
finished
other timed
can
vehicles
accommodate
pavement
characteristics.
their in-service whether
driving
the
vehicles
drainage
which
proactive the
arebebenefits.
for
concrete
pricing
in
change
performanceto
monitoring
(biggest
Helbing
transfers.
to
increase
product; better
complex
difficult
the
Such or
compute
provide
the
long-term
characteristics
typically
tasks
application
on for
and (d)
structures the
not
proposed
during
approaches We
during and
provides
proposals.
mobility
guidance
Communities-
1995, under
of
federal,
Travel
greater
understand
speeds, reduced
the
and
is
are
projects,
thecostly
either
the
transportation
bus
Still
in
lower
provide
talking
involvement
of such
(e.g.,
and
adequately
performance. would
awalking
the
models
community 2000,
state,
labor
routine
without
a safety
observation
concrete
huge
routes.
howtravel
a
an
andneed AFF30, Concrete Bridges
about
anti-
the
needs;
Economy
trade.
joints
has
financial
RESEARCH
One
data
of remained
adequately
approach.
In of
and
private
projects,
evaluating
wavelength
Congressional
period,
service.
icing).
needs
Previous As
ofHow
every
the and
data
further
Itfailing
low revenues
6would
OBJECTIVES
entities to
common:
staffing
considering
includes
techniques
studies and
spectrum 12
concepts
similar
economic
vision in
complicating
have and
pursuing
ft.
problems
a Test
resources
resource
establishing
programsare
transit or increases
the
necessary
variety
these
a
being
demonstrated results
2003
single
stimulus
users. facing
the of
that types
issues
any and the
from
Manual
to
aspects—
number
bill
analysis.
adopted the
with
inand
that a
account
to
This account
In-service
mixtures
water
Substantial
surface,
Advancing
Kerridge
pavement
local
typically
design
properties
costs
(e)
negative data
lower
efficiency body,
levels,
transportation
California
on and
Uniform
recognizing
forthat
would
2001,
take
sensitivity. of
cause
noise
environment?
of
the
for
assessment
athe
progress
Projects
working
where
cast-in-place
user
reduce
rugged
to
one-half
existing
Traffic
the
pertinent
be
Daamen check
reverse
levels;
system
sector
corrosion
characteristics;
the
has
thoroughly
through
platform requires
mountainous
well-developed
Control andthe
and
specific
box been
for
2004,
would
properties
likelihood
approaching
headway
new
diversion(f)
girder
Devices
and lessmadethe
analyzed
Partnerships”.
Teknomo
construction
types
be
policies to land
of
terrain
optimal.
bridges in
ofof
the the
into torecy
fly AFH50, Portland Cement ConSustainability
bridge
facilitate
planning,
predictable
current
congestion
representing
about
2.
discourage
into
design.
use
cracking
or an
evaluating
determine engineering
$30
Collision-based
practice,
context;
consideration HOT
The
extremely insystem
design,outcome
the lane
pricing
billion the
properties
the
bridge
the
distractionof use
research build,
in
relative
the community
effectiveness
planning
proposal,
texture,
safety
of
piers
congested
effects new finance,
regarding
vehicles
and
of
interaction
of and
sources such
federaland
analysis
shape,
cost, it
abutments
urban
reliability is
as
thatis
(i.e., the
effects
design.
vital
mean
money
is
texture
between being
ona
use that
the
motor
Project
Snow
2006,
For
tolled
pumpinginmany
However,
conjunction
have
(MUTCD) low
methodologies,
connecting
ash
environmental
The
cracking vehicles
and
correlate CO9
Antonini
highway
shown
objective to
and ice
decades
pressure,
those
designatedattempts
medium
route with
with
friction
of before
control
2006),
processes,
as
cannot
cap
challenges
deteriorationthis now,
the
thusand to
volume
the and
ais entering
operations
and determine
performance
reducing
be
fixed
research wobblea
driverless
average and
the
trade few
related
of pavement
walkingis
concrete the
only allow
dedicated
wait
change
to wear
tosuchhow
vehicles
of timethe AP020, New Public TransportEnvironment
able
operation,
cultural
What
Translucent
planners
profile
for
reactive
high to
implementation
The
and
3. are
pavements,
carbon
project
angularity
convenience,
traffic
recommend
environment,
performance
experienced ‘see’
resources.
depth
loading, and other
approach, or
management,
concrete
will
by policy
(MPD),
fuels,
and
of to
candesign
bridges,
do
materials
strategies
corrections
the
these ‘visualize’
Evaluating
makers
which
promotes
continues so
now
reliabilitymay
highwayby
busand
made
and
be and
not
means
in the
categorizing
measured
of
properties,
to
to the
operation
by
understand
be
tunnels
areas
mitigate
driversa transit
faulty
system. adequate
that
and ishow
and awith
their as
roadway
the
funding
to
concerns
the
As
chemical
describe
bridge consideration
maintenance
commercial
have
design been
transfer,
OBJECTIVE
pavements
and tear
price
coefficients
speed (4.0
transportation
decks. and
applications.
sources
ofas
of
and
best aand
in
the
somefollowing
agencies
software
dreamwhich
allowances,
to
feet/second) be exist
then
pumps
material
practices
For of (or
Various
travelers,
very
agencies
atransit
long to
apply
they unpredictable
greenhouse
to
offerings
a
and
small,
usage.
for keep
nightmare
address
are
alter
for
time, a
thelocally
the
seek as
evaluating the
are
value-of-time
used
itneed
particularly
the “PCI”
to
was gas
problems
under
share
compared forfor SRTS of ABJ50, Information Systems Environment
measurable
maintenance—in
effectiveness
issues
embedding
the
in
likely effects
transportation
advanced
vision
automated
compared
environmental
cracking
design
Reliability
association we
applications
significant tois or flow
used.
in will of
remote
to
is relationships
number toof
optical face
pricing
techniques
bridge
constructionother
also
with It PAs
requiring
state
alternatives
effects. in
of has
fibers the
on
measurements
catalogs modes;
piers
becoming
the been
departments
that
The
and
could
occurrence between
service
transition?
or
equity
advanced
collisions the and
offer based
lightguides
incidence
personal
primary
abutments.
more be issues
must
very
of the
provisions
of
systems
higher
widely on
How
safety- be in
of
paths.
emissions
highway
some)
available
with
weight
Evaluate
the
In
cranes
low the
emissions
to
timing.
modernize
programs
believed the
income
segmental which
prevailingto
absence
to
This system
highway
rail,
that is,
(Crowd
aggregates
calculate
deliver
and or
seemed
bus
travelers,
reductions could
of
bridges.
practice
and safe,
add
develop Dynamics,
superstructure network
and
environmentalempirical
concrete or
has be,
mobile,
unattainable
afunctionality
transfer
may
fromaResearchintegrated
granular
transit been
set to
in
be VISSIM
data
of reliable,
serve
penalty
systems
conditions.
buckets
negatively
transportation,
less
flexibility is
to in
materials into
(PTV
needed
than atto
and and
had
manipulation
and
trial
shall
relative
modeling
Wikis
and
the
precision
safety; projects
and
conventional
disadvantage
complicated
recognized
critical they
transportation
reported
encourages began
innovative
variety to
and
eventserrorbe
of
before
than of up
passenger
the
as
even
as and of
increases and
addressed?
concrete,
vision
of system
to
akey
winter
(i.e., free,
conventional
the
such date
focused
tire/pavement
(DOTs)
an expensive
asituations. action travel.
in
open
road
impairments
presence
factor
crashes, an parameters
has
with2009
vehicle on
evaluation
in produced
the
It
issurface
taken.
site
methods. short-term
is
and fibers
arguably
ofoccupancy
ifnear-crashes,
bothnot for and2010.
social
delay and inIn ABJ50, Information Systems Environment
traditional
productive.
2004),
current
can
vehicular
estimate
stations
In
impacted
and
to
existing
Too be
particular,
developed
the job
impact
establish
effective,
often,
recommended
no
system effect SIMWALK).
traffic
usedin
site. an by atransportation
traffic.
since
information
on the
effectiveness). Nonetheless,
from to
OD
sample
Other
this
costs
credible
bridge replace
documented
its Such
travel
properly
system
selection
best in Yet of
long-term
use the there
processes
matrix.
values
is
systems,
practices
deck community
to planning
the
However,
unsuitable (EPRI
designed
ato
transportation
increasingly
of snowis
deterioration. cost
no
Presently
benefits
pointbe
many
for and
2006) of
used
and
local and
widely-
soil
where
are such
settings
ice or
in
overall
rather
oriented
just
the
addition
marketing
approach
The as
interaction.
3.
rates.
anyoneThere
treatmentU.S. This
research
impossible.
and
A values
than
congestion and in
important
are
population
crash-relevant
multimodal to is specific
areaA
techniques.
these
campaigns.
the
The for
long-term
will –public
three-dimensional
well-known
everyone also
extensive
be
failure
reduction
transportation directions
ifpavement
by
properties, not
includes
to
carried
conflicts). age.transit
results.
of more
concerns
contribute
time
–theThen,
out so
changes
other
especiallyroof
system providers,
Federal
so
periodthat
–with
(3D)
it
through for
ideas,
factors
slabs will and
light
in
for a ANF10, Pedestrians
of
project
RESEARCH
activities
recognized
robotics
construct
funding
there
to
include
their
sector?
spliced
unsustainable
adopting
control
SRTS
Recent are
determine:
time-dependent
research development
mobility
programs.are
field is
research
a
few
studies,
longevity PROBLEM
Universities,
girder or
materials such
model
flexible
rarely tools
is
designs.
exploring
researchgivenA a the
of
severely
is major
for
has
in
changes
case the processes.
STATEMENT
walking
progressed
place
service degree
government
seniors,
focused use
and outlay
in
bridges
study for
planners
hampered
of fly of
the
open
solely behavior
base
improving
approach
observations ash This
that
diversion,
as they
visually
on it
layer.
can
unless Society
transit
state
II.
is
share OBJECTIVE
transmitted
planners
measurement,
For
the
land
Before, the
quantity
identifies
to use
consider
required
thorough
the
recurring
involve users,
agencies
knowledge
Central and
highways
planning
during,
to how private
and
include
obtain
program
Artery
congestion
pedestrians find
from
policy-makers
however,
and
these element
quality
that
and one
afterfirms,
themselves
potentially
of
Tunnel
and side
leads will
of
experience,
impairments
aggregate
literature
associated ofand
winter
in
vehicles to of
provide
the
collision
to
Boston, point society-at-
dealing
athe
understand
meaningful lower
review,
with
in post
storms,
affect and
close athe
data.
research
demands
that
Denseâ€
conditions
use
(1)
will
these
agencies,
impaired,to
the
mineralogy
and beemerged
tremendously
its
architecture
material
should
suggest
The UPS analyze
role
causes
less
impacts
be  proposal
cost
that close
and graded
for
and
likely
used
‘whiteboard’ orandfrom
andscrutiny.
since
pedestrians.
customer
can
other impacts
childrento
service
to
superstructure builds
morphology validation
the
aggregates
solutions
be have
effectiveness
provide To
anticipated
researchers
who
oriented
ads on
1960’s
travel
of large In both
minimize
commuter
will
add
examples and
are when
addition,
will that
voids.
flexibility
represent of
be cross-
usually
remain
haveand
significant
(effective these
usesthe
of
an used
large.
with angry constituents or locked
concrete
the
more
economic
Collision
reliance
materials
winter
mass
This
results.
field
capacity
proximity
projects,
Pedestrian
adverse
comparison
first
preferred
walking
multiple
parking,
studied
unknown
mitigated.
complex
One
objective
highlyrealistic
identified
strength
research
robotics
variabilityof
architectures
temperature
meaningful
plays
effective an the
on structure
data
maintenance
effects
and orstimulus
Additionally,
investigations,
Massachusetts for
routes
in
across and
economic
to
important
means
low
limitations.
but to and one
theof
differentiated
and
reporting
explore
vision
will
studies.
terms
This as
vehicles
variables
and and
thatthis
energywell
another.
main
bicyclist
of
constructing
biking or of
environmental
potentially
walking
(SOA). research
of
to
winter
needs
modes
models
role
using
research
package
aIn
toitanother.
comprehensive
needs
investigate
and as
tragically
were
traffic
speeds.
Open
level-of-service
efficient
is
However, is
be
and
efficiency
vision.
activities the
safety
fact,
in
often
often
laboratory
difference In
storms
to of
such
are
hinder
focuses
to
to
any
model
able
evaluated
evaluation
bridge
visualization
is
often
complete
generation,
be
isThe
segmented
Wikipedia
allow
transit
effects
the
killed
the to
ato
parameters
estimate
The
architecture onisinto
public
the
1)tips
vehicles
afollowing
difficult,
such move
layer
impacts).
deck
for
ofusers.
testing.
athat
road
as and
of
is
financial
study
the
blending.
question:fibers
commercial
assessment
successful,
incomplete,
for
probably
Knowing
impractical,
Specific
motorist
research
conflicts,
the how
transportation.
safe
primary
significant commitments
and the
that
thecan traffic
Pavement
How
project
in and
of
state
and/or
July
focus
concern be
has the
inconsistently
best
effective
low can
pedestrian patterns
modified
business
DOTs
tasks
2006 pavement
known
vision
been
of for mustthat
movement
performance
changes
expensive
is
thiswill a of
peopleand
so
markets
be:
grim
conducted
is cannot
these
to
clearly
research
communities thatvolumes
texture.
quickly
reported the
to of the
sites
typically
reminder obtain be
served
roll
by
to-date,
the
will inthe light
This
betheor
of
users,
validation
centimeter
with
considered
trips
transit
of
impact
allowance
part
upcoming
involves
Procurement
methods. instate
the
moisture,
acceptance
The advantages
of
deterioration.
simple
RESEARCH of
the primary
adeployment
access
narrative is
corridor
aif and
by
VMT
pricesseldom
together
of
friction
MUTCD
PROPOSED and
temperature
decisions
These local
centimeter
ofto function
congestion
on
andortransitdone
employing
loss
will agencies
and
network.
drivers
convey ofGHG study
lower
loosely
too
observations at
up
to
frequently
ridership;
and
tolling aserve
based to
reductions
often
basic is
the spend
level now
leachability.
reinforced
the and on
design
coupled, load
ignore
are
system the
and their
met
would
is
by
out the
different
and
people
have
properties
pedestrian
account
•in
the an when
visible
projects
vulnerable
United change
highway
help
provides
little
Literature
importance
attempt
developmentand only
for
States. appropriate
to any
all
review
user. in
understand
jurisdiction.that
goods.abe
environment
to as
the aget
certain
system
positive
training,
of metropolitan
considered
Walking of data
and
effective
establish
Pedestrian a contingencies
stimulus
These
Significant CDMF directions.
and
and
lesson
and
and this
increase
problem a tomodel
and
QA/QC
value
safety be
money
shortcomings
on
population
information
for
bicycling area
investments able
the Since
the
optimized
walk
for
is
climate oneare
to to is
significant
comparable
where,
distribution.
same
(2)
This the
implementation
SCC
income
from
influence
walking in group
will thanks
role
bridge
other provide
group.
speed of amountto
or
and
sectors.
the piersmotorized
mostly
Aggregates
professional
to interactive
of
duct of
information
3.5 projects.
confined resources
to
Examples
material
ft/sec the
with traffic.
for various
deals
effects
withhigh
on include
onthe annually
Only
how fines
with
of
CFRP
losses. the
modular
costs
equally
concepts
The
not
transitions
light
provide
value
in winter
harder
include
mode
required
definition:
techniques
travel
of the
change
account
of
project
addressed
can
tire/pavement
construction
are even of
timetotrue
ansoftware
corrosion
beof
informed,
more
durability,
access
Federal from firstfor
global
would
efficiently
open
maintenance
serve
review
decision-making
for sector
during or
shares,
reliability, steel
to
interaction,
pronounced
Highway
approximately
components
aand
supply
examine
accounted
community
through
in-service resistance
the
the and
limited
balanced
and and environmental
transmitted
into
research concrete
chains,
targeted
published
hasdesign transitcase
experimental
at primarily
Administration’s
the
13 for
number
andand
in theof
to the
phase,
whose
itsin
have
loads, aPCI,
studies
over
equitable
broader
case
services
system
literature
federal,
percent PA.
of of
set-
initial
of
of
in
High
EPA’sperforming
recently
military
(minus
both
commuter
type
II.
grids
Plastic
and
impacts.
bridges. 3.0
interfaces
alternative
transit
Policies modes
frequency
and
OBJECTIVE
have
ADAGE
and has
programs
No.
ft/sec
InAn
projects,
agreed are 200within
parking
magnitude
not
steel
the afor
validation
model.
asset based
distribution US,variety
sieve
grids
been ducts
both
upon throughout
the onan size)
are
of of
been
investigated
management
there onHowever,
by could
total
PPPs maintenance
organization.
and these the by
published,
is
methods, WALK
a
and
signatories conducted
contents most
have
trend the
different
changes yet.world,
plus
traditional and/or
non-
to to use aare at
PA
HOT
long
economy.
been
and
ups.
on
focused lanes
distances
consideration
implication
pedestrian-involved
Options
contributors.
are
frictional
efficiency, made
concrete
construction, better
on and
With
inproperties,
all
and on
in
thebridgeto
and then
by
friction,
three
Todaythe
served
overall
relative optical
acommercial
significant
United
the deckto
areas a
through
etc.transit
service fully
noise,
collisions.
organizations fibers,
may
States
The
overlays.
value priced
and
splash
commitment
usage?
life
of For
be itreliability,
and
Universal
current isThis
needed
both
of and
other
such (and
RESEARCH PROBLEM STATEMENT ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
In
III. an increasingly complex
RESEARCH PROBLEM STATEMENT AHB70, Access ManagementSociety pedestrian Environment
environment, where the pedestrian
III.
phasesThe RESEARCH
may not be PROBLEM
concurrent STATEMENT with are AHB70, Access ManagementEnvironment
In the early purposes
stages of this research
(1960-1962) of
RESEARCH
vehicular
three-fold: PROBLEM
green, recognition STATEMENT of pedestrian AFB70, Utilities Society
developing
The
signal collection
indications the Interstate
and is depiction
necessary. Highway of utilities
Safe System,
In
1.
ainformation theAssess
few past eight
individuals the current years,
recognized transit
application the agenciesneed offor, AP020, New Public TransportSustainability Sustainable
initiation
from
visualization Seattle on
of pedestrian
to
in highway
Washington,
access plansDC
crossing
management allows at
have
Transit
and
highway
signalized system
proposed, designers
intersections capital
planning to the efficiency
consider of development
depends is
methods often
onteam both toin AP020, New Public TransportEconomic
partnered
projects.
criticized In
due withdoing to car-sharing
low so, ridership researchoperatorsand high with
the
II.
avoid
knowledge
the
hopes
vicinity
RESEARCH
goals them
to of
learn
of
and
of interchanges.
NEEDS
the
improvingwhatallowsonset STATEMENTconstructors
of the access,
station
visualization
These walk tools to AFD90, Surface Properties - VDevelopment
Environment
capital
proposals
Safety
know
interval, costs,
is
where a
as were
top combining
they
indicated received
priority are byso at to
with
every
as
the limit
to little
avoid
pedestrian level or of no the
Problem
increasing
and
competitive
interest, methods Statement:
and ridership,
inwere
economic some and
previously providing
application
cases, usedof
hostility. wider
and this ANB10, Transportation Safe Sustainable
transportation
damaging
signal
As
mobility
assess of Januaryindication,
any them.
options hierarchy
2008,
corresponding However,
and
for on
forty-three
customers. (local,
the utilities
successes. ability state,
stats
TCRP tohad and
This
Research
transportation
federal).
information Problem
Highway mode.
is sensitive Statement:
safety The and relatively
is clearlyneeds The public-
atoof lowbe AV020, Aviation System Plan Sustainability
simultaneously
announced
Report
effort
use will
airports 108, funding
result in monitor
Car-Sharing:
the in a for
Unitedpreliminary conflicting
statewide
Where
States and
set
areSafe How
all
volume
The
II.
multidisciplinary Florida
RESEARCH of transit
Department
PROBLEM vehicles
problem of and
STATEMENT
thatTransportation may AV020, Aviation System Plan Environment
protected
movement
Routes
it
professional
unique
infrastructure
(FDOT) Succeeds to from
of
School
tounacceptable
was theirprovided those
vehicles
considerations
the programs
locations,
compared
first ainthat
state
society
comprehensive
local
to
highway forhas
may
involving
highway
be three
that
using
industry turning
agency
As
interacting
use
across
Research
nearly compatible
it for
the
2,000 components:
crosswalk
Problem land
schools. acquisition
or
Statement: thatthe
purposes. vehicle,
may concerns
to theis AV020, Aviation System Plan Environment
beThere
overview
visualization
and
solutions
(circa
continue
driver,
therefore
running
populations,
1995)
and the
of to
limits
toa the
the
on
rise
need
red
development
access
and
roadway and
competition
adopt in
light. the
each aIt
their is critical
management
guideline ownership
implementationand
infrastructure.
state
of car-
to for
The
articulate
sharing,
projects.
With 517rising commercial
the the impacts
ofgeographic
fuel prices, service
of andthe
growing airports
Safe
demographic Routes
concerns
models.
economies
spacing
of
Therefore,
determine
Persons more There
from
non-precision
having to an are
scale
achieve
essential off-ramp
reduced
several
resulting and
significant
activities visual
different
terminal inrequiring
precision high
fields safety tomay the ADA60, Public Involvement inEnvironment
according
to
markets
2.
for
ownership
capital School
the Develop where to
programs
environment,
costs. the
models:The an it National thus
succeeds,
interactive
state
necessity and farPlan
expanding
agencies,ofand
and of
visualization
a to
the
mode
first
Background
approaches
improvements,
utilities
particularly right-in/right-out
information are itdeveloped
have isSystems
necessary
difficultyand access with
consistent
locating and to newto
improve the
andthe ANB60, Safe Mobility of OldeEconomy
Integrated
address
impacts
prototype
waistlines,
municipalities,
change toonreach Airport
challenges
to vehicle
biking communicate and
counties,
larger in
ownership order
walking
client aretovolumes
key
authorities, areexpected
sustain
and access travel
gaining in ABE40, Critical TransportatioEconomy
first
instrumentation
in
accountable
pedestrian
Transit all full
Because
three movement
revenue areas birthrates
methods
signals (GPS)
and
theft in access
a by for rose
approaches,
their
visually connection.
transit dramatically
interactions.
protecting cluttered
employees that
to
momentum
behavior.
management
popularity
private
low require
to enterprise
medium $41
Itdecades
as has billion
generated proved
atechniques
mode (an
population in by
choice capital
individual this
valuable
that density very
are
across not
or young
only
typically
a the
areas
The
in
acquisition
This
information. the guideline
two
proposed of was
aviation
project
These based
following upon
easements
would the
focus traffic areon the ABE40, Critical TransportatioSociety
background.
and
developments
federal
to
difficult
II.
nation.
company),
increases theprogram.
transit general
to agency
RESEARCH
Bicycle convey
or
travel
Persons
over
and
aWorld public
staff amethods
having
topedestrian
combination
times the
PROBLEM fiveis public.
but
and ayear
reduces
low
problem
also must
to acuity
period.[1]
An
STATEMENT
facilities
thereof. other be
that
the
operational
conclusion
expected
contact
acceptable
often
needs have
toplannedto
between
be of
toanalysis,
rise.
difficultyboth
addressed. One
the antidotal
War
highway of
roadway
discriminating II
the
Employee and andprimary
andthereafter
utilitythe
the
theft,
The
partners
example
may large
be and
such
conceptual medium
as local
as part hub
governments,
graphic aairports
visualizing serve
Time
attractiveness
information,
Background:
declined,
questions
vehicle
organizations.
signal
in
89%
Objectives:
universities,
and
particular,
of byand time
information.
the often and
providing
may
scheduled
and
ofagain,
further the
observations
asked byofproperty
airport
alternative.
owing
guidelines
While
frequently
developers. passenger it is
roadway
toownership
go at
While
the
on
assumed an owners
the
unnoticed the
AHB15, Intelligent Transport Environment
such
improvement
status
Additionally
interchange
During
extension
who access
are comes
the askedin management
the
area
mid-1990s study,
into
expectedto lack
where
sell public
question. of the techniques
multi-mode transportation
litigation
lifespan
their This
National
aviation study
enjoyed was use is byof
rights AHB60, Highway/Rail Grade CEnvironment
desired
The
that
because
enplanements.
report
provided Americans
color
objectivesfrictional
provides
employees
concluded with
of The properties
the 1.aare
that Disabilities
helpful
Airport
researchcognizant
car-sharing of
cue
Improvementthe
are Acttooverall
about
to
study,
should
the
involved.
Automated
that
for
pavement given
the or
generation,
safe ain
evaluate Figure
study
infrastructure
The Highway
navigation
surfaces dedicated
the
evaluation
the fordifferences
System
domestic of investment
also to
aircraft
different non-
concluded
Consortium of
population
roadis each
raises
“what of
RESEARCH
Accessibility
discriminate
transit
Program
understand
has
Background:
3.
As
motorized a operations
strong
Measure
described (AIP) OBJECTIVE
modes.Guidelines
howpedestrian
role
in supports
the
the and
in and with
reducing
value
National
Outreach (ADAAG)
havesignal
airport
andwhat daily
vehicle
benefits
Infrastructure
to require
access
safety,
impacts
existing travel
to to
is AHB15, Intelligent Transport Economy
the
public
that
(NAHSC)
will
characteristics,
The
that possible
happen transport
separation
likely
objective
gaps conducted
include
in ownership
to ofmy
pedestrian fares
between
an
functional
this extensive
unusually
property research models
and/or
pathsan valuessubsidy
off-ramp
classifications,
is so
research
large
(sidewalksto that
once
identifyand on
information,
revenue
capacity,
the
and
Deployment
both
Protection
airport Safe
boosting and
and
Routes
practitioners
potentialowners, Plan low
inventory
of vision
environmental
transit to School
comprehensive
users (NIPP), and
communities of ridership, may
storage
the
cyber
bicycle affect
legislation
public projects
and itareas ability
provided
vehicle-
of
state as
to
being
using
burden.
Background:
downstream
automated
proportion
the
State
and
to easement
geographical
and
crosswalks)
discriminate localof access
transportation
elderly
is inmobility
not
color was
place.”
conditions.
Departments for
exceed
under more systems,
athere
spanItvaried
1/2 is
of critical
ofnation.
unknown
inch. 30 (i.e.,
lighting The AHB15, Intelligent Transport Environment
well
thousands
implemented;
little
infrastructure
such
pedestrian
legislators as
data
a other
tool. on of sensitive
airports
the
facilities
will research
cooperation
includes
have should
informationareas
across
iftrucks
impacts
electronic asbe of
the the
is
envisioned
considered aof
necessary key
Transit
longer
including
years
if
Driver
Transportation
Draft
conditions.
agency. there or buses
distance
more
are development
perception
Guidelines
In any and
Usability
transit is
commencing heavy
required)
specific
(DOTs)
for of aofand
Accessible
systems of
studies
pedestrian
pedestrian than
operational
in
utility
using or are the
around
which
Rights
smart likely
conflict
signals of to ANB75T, Task Force on Roun Environment
The
minimum
submarkets
in
Background:
information
an
to
A the Operational
integral
make
potential VII Level
initiative
informed where
and
aspect
solution ofEvolution
Service
transit
will
communications
of
decisionsthese
exists require Partnership
for
and
in studies.
ontheschool
urban
the formsystems,
future
be
separation
concepts
2016.
address
III.
or
companies
Way
by
cards
(OEP)
children
II.RESEARCH
planners
investments
In
and
the
the
pedestrians
1999,the or
has
early
RESEARCH
(June and
Considerable
this
possibility
Automated
need
NCHRP that
17,
focused
walking
information
adopters
between
issuetechnologies;
PROBLEM
of have
2002)
with to
specific
billions so
OBJECTIVE
ofon
published
a
wealth
alow that
allow
Fare
school;
of
keyfull
conflict
developed
contained
vehicle
movement
an
vision
STATEMENT
information.
of
investigation
has
answer
needs
pedestrian
Collection
airport
dollarsresearch
Report
been
methods
appears
inon by 420,
those toofto AV020, Aviation System Plan Environment
could
For
public
Considerations
of
networked
automation
access
accumulated
be
The
occur the
traffic,
provided airport.
and
objective
at the electric
an
societal to byof
earliest include
technologies
on-ramp.
the and
members
this transportation
property
work
possible safety,based
Investigations
institutionalof
would this
owner.mobility,
moment. where
“baby
be thethe
for
paths
systems,
developments
addresses
The
example,
agencies,
“Impacts
systems. determining
crossing
influenced
aviation revenue
the
agency
private
of Access
Information when
railroads
strongly
atI2V
liability
industry theft
the
staff
industry is
Management utilities
by
nationsby atdifferences
concerns
often
and keenly grade
employees
and needs information
busiest
awareand
private toto have is a a AT045, Intermodal Freight TrEnvironment
in
of
accessibility,
I.
light
use
from
impacts;
boom”
Identifying
determination
This Research
of weight
the V2V
which
statement Oregon
and and
an connectivity,
Problem
vehicles
a haspublic
answer
of also
the
proposes Statement
can
cooperative
Department demonstration.
to aesthetics,
enter
distinguished
frictional this
a study of and
question data exit and
for
itself a
should
2-1/2
lighting
minimized
airports
societal
the
know
individuals.
Techniques”
communications need thebe
inch and
along
barriers
for provided
gap
by
impacts glare. on
reducing
with
increased
Before
where the and
implementing
of
systems such
it inside
coordinated thehow
safety
car-sharing
identifiedlarge
are cash ofitand should
the
Safethat
air
on
investments
composed over rail
securityis
traffic
access
100 be
for of AT045, Intermodal Freight TrSociety
other
Rail
guideway
variety
Transportation
However,
from
would
I.
requirements
pedestrian Research factors
capacity
its of
allowpredecessor inof
infrastructure
reasons:
for the
those
Problem of
visibility relevance
many
(ODOT)past
ainitiatives.
highway inparts
consultants decade,
Statement
including to
expanded
liberal to of
achieveusers.
surface the
thework
spending
and U.S.
uponfirst
on
within
impacts is Environment
protected
the
In
accessible
management
Routes
at
mode
can
individual
hardware railroad
order
airports.
be to
share,toin
made, when
to
School car’s
judge employees.
However,
access
and on the provided.
awheel
initiatives
parking
software safe
investors
management most flanges
time
and However,
demand
that of
need to the
process, (3to
begin
investments. inches
focus
in
techniques joint
see is
However,
stretched
and
-highway
this
behavior.
sponsors
Many
the
of last
work amajor
context
lighting mile
simpler to
and
automation
to planning
its
travel
Anticipating
and better
ofseaports limits.
driving
developed
overall
other segments
address for
has At
in this non-motorized
the
environment
more
been
the
functional
elements same
inlargely
demographic
property
nation thetime,
extensive
such same
arecan
as
are
crossing,
revenue
During
I.
on
development
clear
and
store,
modes, allowed
Research
larger, the
indications
recommended
and pastfor
pedestrians
theft Problem
commercial
outreach communicate. tracks
stilldecade,
projects,of occurs
the
efforts carrying
need
Statement
service
correspondingand through
capacity
comparison to
on
Processing
must freight).
airports
travel
extend AT045, Intermodal Freight Tr Economic
As
the
vehicle
be
separation
dormant
shift,
owner
over-crowded
performance.
newspaper
The part
freight
offered,
state
Public of
used the
while
concerns railroad
since
and for
distances.
boxes, analysis
guideway
transit
substantial
federal
with
Rights-of-WayThese related industry
containers.
shrubs, itgovernment
These
frictional will
buses
to this
and is
travel. beentering
distances
progress
Accessibility and interesting
issue.
This
other The heavy
hasand an
simultaneously
reprogramming
constraints
Major
located
behavior
between
classifications
includes
beyond
I. Research intermodal
in for
the
the
the across
large, use
of
urban
welfare-to-work
benefits
based
creation,
community
Problem the
cargosignal
smart on National
they hubs
areas. information
cards
policy
access,
Statement of will
users. by
often
Many Aviation
recipients.
receive
and This are
of
design Development
AT045, Intermodal Freight TrEquity
to
era
same
trucks
were
been
transportation
contributes
expectations
obstructions
Advisory note
of new
madecan
adoptedwhat
guideway operate
Committee on
to form
constraints by
should is
many
officials
congestion
anywhere of
used
in
Oregon be ownership
their
of onfor
the
have
based
in
recommended its small
own financial
Administrative
on
the underlying
developed
roadways public
special-
onorhighway
stopping that
be
sophisticated
System
located
these
Sustainable
and
criteria.
modification,
need aware
the (NAS)
in
airports
providescosts
This ofor vehicular
hackers
nearhave
are
development
they
project
andan thebecome
receiving
will is
destruction threats
who
historic
incur.
not may monies
requirements
intended that
progressively
core
Vehicle-
of should
may
ofto
to not
consistently
performance.
transit
purpose
Rule.
enabling
evidence
Objective
III.
and
alignment,
distance
this
inhibit
be
more
older
upgrade
also
infrastructure
validate
OBJECTIVE
air
exception
employed and lanes,
crossing
binding
metropolitan
bring passenger
new
existing
yields
freight
technologies
that
pollution
line highwayof
by this
asexpire
at
needs inopportunity
Intermodal
segregated
sight
the
cooperation
the
vehicles
population
the
research densely
areas.
and since
agency.
secular
besttraffic
upstream
onset
for Many
facilities
results
that
from
theseof
standardized
or involves
for
will
populated
Light
trend from
the
practices, cargo
the
islarger
are
the be for
the
WALK
rail
of
security the
such
an ABG30, Technology Transfer Sustainable
but
information.
implementation
The
airport
fastest
captive
hazards
(telecommunications,
challenged
The
areas ResearchFederal
purpose in
growing
to
of
adjacent terms
the
isnormal
to Storage
Highway
needed
of preserve
to of
of
component
guideway
this growth
driving;
port to includes
innovative
Administration’s
project and
software,
its
assess and of
mobility.
facilities. use
would paper,
public
therail Along freight
off-line
be to
features/environment,
top
gaps
signal.
systems
I.
demand
hubs
as
indicators
complex
is ofcan
Research
funding
intended the
were Older trap
are curb
presses built
for
revealing
interactions
to ramp.
wheelchair
pedestrians
particularly
Problem these
develop against
before Statement
airports
how within
aand
This
the the
each would
wheels traffic
typically
vulnerable NAS’s
widespread
is
the
visualization modemore include
(manual
havetooffare AHB45, Traffic Flow Theory aEnvironment
magnetic,
involvement
(FHWA)
sustainability.
traffic
loading
-computing,
NCHRP
following:
conduct
with and Freight
and
custom-made,
It Synthesis
has
concerns amotor electronic,
has and
sensing,
been
multi-step Use
put
unloading
about facilitation
Analysis
332,
widely of and
considerable real
effort all
Framework
facilities.
high-value
Access
electronic
congestion case
reported to other
techniques.
assessstudies
strain
While
heavy
actuation,
and media
that theonA
on
characteristics.
the
and
decreased
evasion
The
component
usage
readily
travel
transportation
resource point
motorized,
types of
can of
problems
available.
help
that view
contrast
and limits. Best
relative of
motorized
due
vehicles.
in
system,
complements The
Smaller
reducingthepractices,
sensitivityto pedestrian.
the
influences
FAA,
and mobility
Cargo
general useand both
individual
negative
with
existing hubs, of
theof
aviationSight
visual
the
types.
I.
synthesis
forecasts
would
the
vehicles
Management
etc.).
about
Current
question
pollution Research
capacity
guideway,Communications
be willis
that
Furthermore,
two practices
of
are Problem
helpfulproposed
thirdsof
be
the U.S.
on the
electric
concernslikelyin
Crossroads
of
impactfor Statement
domestic
providing
existing
the to topower
planning
of include
document
adopt
transportation
Gross
about an freight
in afor
infrastructure.
is new sharing
full
fed
the
Domestic
aviation
safety the
to
Vicinity
and the AHB45, Traffic Flow Theory aEnvironment
domestically
distance
scooter
acuity,
honor
exogenous
states
residences,
airports,
impacts
economy
informational and triangle
wheels,
reduced
systemincluding and
variablesand
communities,
and
(environment,
as a whole, abroad,
and
other
peripheral
the
commercial
materials rural other
mobility
lack
determining
that will
the
airports
pollution,
used vision,
of be
illustrations
airlines,
areas
conventionalto aids
turnstiles critically
that and
gap
car (i.e.
tended and ora
and
experiences
volumes
understanding
Further
vehicles
capabilities
of
environment
RESEARCH distribution
Interchanges and
projected
in real
in of
PROBLEM has of
time
less of
(2004) information.
transportation
international airport
growth
time
changed, as they
and
provided
STATEMENT freight
ownership.
in withmove,
with agencies
freight an volumes
less
increased overall
thus in
Product
transferability
easement
security
reviewed,
and
walker,
reduced
other
acceptance
the
to
support
ownership)
transportation
communicate
Unlike
developing
measures
locate access
ultimate other
of
at
alocal onthe
port
documented
cane,
“useful are
relatively
and
and
thein
controlUnited
need
consumer
flows
research
value
facilities,
crutches
field
unknown
economies, near
facilitating
project
the to States
of
mechanisms.
principals
applying such
and
cover
of or
ofevaluation
one
as
project
view,”abraces)
especially
for
air
have
public travel
air,
(GDP)
parcel
integrated
the (Wilson
situations
transport
another
and motorist
limited
water, for
benefits
is
over
asall
and
Fare inand
and in AHB50, Traffic Control Devic Environment
will
and
eliminating
development
exhaustive
concerns
In
attributable
conceptualization
the
related
into
-internet an increase
intermodal
short
pedestrianincreasingly
to
guidelines about
and the
review
to
possible by
line cost 67
in
on-board
traffic
consumer
long-term
that of percent
particular
than
of
complex
(scanning,
terrorist
will
sight if
nationwide energy
they
congestion,
period
help and will
pedestrian
spending.
usage were
develop
attocompetitive
all 85
of cause
locations,storage
practice
serious
its
of It is
some
Grayson,
A
evaders
such
services
part
funding
populations
approaches
of
participation recent
access as cases,
because are
lane
and Age-related
Government
have the
typically
changing,
management.
packets, feet
practical
transportation
resources
segments
aretools not traffic
and of
caught
likely andpedestrians.
differences
Accountability
entering
available
(increasing
The
flow only
choices
be
existing
isthat atoin
when
adequate.
unique the
priority
access That
were in AP060, Paratransit Equity Society
percent,
more
challenge
applied
and
consideration
environment,
reasonable
benchmarking,
existence
containers
more
especially
committee
Office
transit
road
constraints
limited,
upgrade
to a
capacity
provides
crossing
or (GAO)
flexible
torespectively,
pro-active
personnel
passing
that
andpassenger
theto
slow-moving,
the to
on safety
mode
constraints
has
recommendations
of
where
conclude
carry etc.)
provide
beginning
recognized,
behavior
reportthe other
limited
construction
friction
conduct the
materials
identified
commitment
of and astrategies
between
cars; of
vehicles
and
travel). of
however,and
electric
pedestrian
that
written
(or adult
fare
security the
skid
the
expensive. of
more
on
Since
1998
issues.
for
new
cross
checks;
of
in
that
a
vehicle
spending
document
if
features
and
rural
the
toll
walk,
than no
New
informational
RESEARCH
that
planning
2020.
range
-roads
research.
phases
power evaluation
it involves
The and
introduction
and may
of the PROBLEM
FHWA
application.
According
dedicated
not approaches
materials
driver
designingbe
generation suggests
of to new
truck
concurrent include,
STATEMENT:
intelligence
the
This
this that will
bicycle
solution
capabilities
document,
facilities,
described this
with be
but inSince
and are
the
and the AP060, Paratransit
will Sustainability Environment
Potential
that
deployed
resistance)
the
technology
pedestrians,
60
therefore
road.
financial
Numerous
at
TCRP
needed
not
the
Cyber their can
point
federal Report
limited
mid to
systems
befor
could
of
Particularly,
resources
facility. innovation
referenced
policies
entry.
exists
programs
while
business
108
simultaneously
to,
late the cause
Publication
many
A
1970s,
are to
the
was or
This
to reduce
that
and
critical
following:
used
by
role
the in
considerable
programs,
helps
fare
published
the inNo. building
industry
provide
of
air
residences
need the
evasion
satisfy
use
a wideavoid
TRRL-L-933,
velocity
transport
of gapdefine
exists
in the aabove
funding
2005,
range crash
to of
loop.
pedestrian
growth,
In
leverages
be
following
Currently,
newly
vehicular
plays
transferability
professionals
damage
frictional adone aThe
nation via effect
especially
the
areas
concentrated
and green,
substantial infrastructure.
where
airports trend
professional
and
loss
investigatory into of
are driver
in
airports
recognition
of the
real international
toward
lacking
develop
attention
contributory
life process
estate
or intelligence
inityear are
drivers
nearby the
across
Greenhouse
of
intervention closed
on and
pedestrian
role
(systems
professionals trade,
North
densely in on
daily,
the is
Gas AV030,
(GHG) Environmental
inventories largely
Impact
through
Sustainability
voluntary
Sustainable
means. One of the reasons for develop
and
without
Transport
for
citations
differences
system
moved
examine
some
needs
volunteers,
transit should
human andincreasing
away
systems
of are and
low-cost
the
applications, help
service
has
the
and fromRoad
issued
have
decision improve
been
services the
the Research
transportation.
each rarely
technologies
particularlyexperiencedcargo
makers
including yield
likelihood
provides.hub in
volunteer behavior.
Laboratory,
itU.S.
investigated. is
that
transit as
the of Ittrain
believed
Since
can be
traffic
likely
could
Public
electrification
maintenance
America:
overcoming
signal
GDP.
approaches,
when
populated
levels, to flow
there present
agencies
indications
conducting
select isbe
the
areas. two-fold,
ofa
staffs challenges
direct
face
the
deployment
is
stakeholder-driven
optimized thata vehicle
necessary.
aviation
Pneumatic i.e.
will
pavement traffic
relationship
similar to
be
easement situation:
platform,
capsule flow
better
challenges
Safe ports
processes, and of
Pedestrian
Many
derailment.
Crowthorne,
seems airport
that size Flangeway
every isfare
programs
England, not
study well require
fillers
1980),
done accounted that
all
over the
of areuse
which for ofinINM
AV030,
andEnvironmental
EDMS to provide Impact
accurate
Sustainability
noise contours and emissions or concentration p
that
resources
technology
used
impressive
·political,
drivers,
operations,
influences
and
between
highways
it
equipped opens
many
to
FHWA
border
vehicle-infrastructure
initiation
etc.)
projects.
pipelines
surfaces, There
increase
has
the
more
are
airport
are
of to
(PCPs)
and/or
increases
corporate, Access
become finite
improved,
maintenance
driver
gateways.
over
transportation
deal
pedestrian
is
the
aresearch.behavior
ownership,
capacity,
with
demonstrated
represent
define
evaders
itfinancial
inbehooves
safety
Management
an core
terms
These
the increasingly
and
cooperative
crossing
land
and
which, succeed
of
and
challenges
airport
freight
energy
limitations
an
performance
the
at
association
alternative inthe
values
security
members
scheduling; Primer:
traffic
market
past
in
ofInat
sight
currently
may
30
stealing
II.
federal
increased,
general
and
Problem
consumer years
Researchdistance
affect
available hasavailable
revenue
government
aviation
http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publication
popular
administration, their
and indicated
Objectives
sectors.
strategy cars ability
from do
transportation
HR airport.
to and to not
accommodate
functions to
thatEven
transit
allocate
stations. hold
use there a
and three
up
pedestrian
systems.
the
options
With areto
the
payroll; foot
the
few, ANB10, Transportation Safe Equity
return,
could
sustainability
is
to
immature
·if
systems.
signalized
between
Integration
that exploding,
specificationsany be
The
could alters
fuel substantial
13
After that
systems
of
help traffic
and
and
access
intersections
driving thiscan the when
cessation
transferability
for address
new flow.
airport forfinancial
generate
spacing
hiatus, Though
intermodal
life
they
dependsitto
concerns
pavements. and expectancy?
factors
makes
into resources
electricity
are ahand,on first
drop
the
aboutsense
both in
high
weights
signal
addition,
Identify any,
discretionary
became
these
transit
advanced shrub
new and
information
substantive
the
cheaper.
s/amprimer/access_mgmt_primer.htm
unmet mobility
ITS effectively
transit speeds
main
numbers,
operationsfunds
technologies needsOn while
toof
barriers
systems
factors the screens
travel
those
car-sharing
of
including
may simultaneously
have
for
other
seniors gap the
common
inventories
projects
come and,view
Automaticin toon ofa
facilities
to
thus
PROBLEM
introduced;
presented
knowledge
consumption
selection
congestion,
afreight accommodate
small creating
re-examine where
child andSTATEMENT
inof this
by the
the freight
competition
funding
pollution,
standing growth
report
about issues
onset is of
half
process
safety,
or exchanged
are
(see and
that
wheel the
(1). limited.
and improving
chapter
are walk
chair likely
Among
security. user to AFF20, Steel Bridges Environment
monitoring
coordination,
of
acceptance
which
·many
Intrusions
organizations
Regional
It
certain
Vehicle
various a wide
is elderly,
possible
FHWAsystems.
are
businesses
extent,range
Location
forms most
to
planning vehicular
and and That
of
their
likely
adeployability
to
Accessaresmall
other
such that
supplies
remained
facing
evaluate has
systems committee
movement.
general
Management
as “problems”
relative
to long serve
new
some
transportation-
better for that
been weight.
the
inanalyzed
or
aviation
challenges
buses, aspects
information, stressed
may Twenty-
near
very are
most
Tri-fold
and be theof
between
III.
Adding
-energy
During
three)
influence
interval,
the
Such
III.
sitting Objective
rail
an
automation
and
pipelines
RESEARCH asmodes,
security
at suitable
ato capacity
inspection
the others
indicated
non-drivers
pedestrian while
could
PROBLEM for
should example,
provides
of
technologies
by
be reducing
ramp.athe
make
usedsuspension
be of
STATEMENT The at
significant
noise
can
automated
pedestrian
13
to marine
shopping
carry
AASHTO help and
to AFF50, Seismic Design and P Society
the
five
allegedly
accessible
Develop
potential
cargo
airport’s
and
sensitive need
percent
need hub
vehicle-infrastructure
Brochure:
disadvantaged
train
more control for
due
air to
due
property
to of
convenient/comfortable research
their
develop
mobility
and older
toto
passengers “attitudes”
people. employees.
microscopic
advantages
can
signal to
persons
come
methods
needs find
and
cooperative
This
systems of
for
is asurveyed
offer solution
state
A
models.
associated
from and
motor
particularly
for
devices NJ the
both or into
tools
system
trains as
facilities
relief
air
bridge
reduce
determine
systems
signal
trips
containers
There
standard in
emissions.
per the in
the
cable,
to
indication,
has month,
is theintermodal
high
an
from
been
three many,
determine nation’s
Automation
aoperating
appropriateand
while
portgreat
feet. if not
on leading
supply
whether
facilities
deal
This the
drivers all, of
costs
methodology
is owners
ability
oftoomake
to ports.
chain
guideway of
these
less
researchhigh to30while
transit may
for in
this
Orlando,
local
Transit
most
with
II. problem.
staff
value FL
employee
clustering,
RESEARCH personnel
to This
reportedthem.the problem
was
PROBLEM need that
and/orcharged
Communities they
to exists
to
be
STATEMENT had
real
with
near for orboth
people
advanced
vehicle,
feasibility
and
(e.g.
relieving
travel
request
buses
which
be
during
children
heavy
difficulty
perceived less
simultaneously
shopping
populated other and
theand
automotive
increases
of
the
and an the
and
as
transit,
aand
http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/access_mg
the case in animals,
rural
command
heavy
combined
trips those
need
estimate
concern
inland
last
light
seeing
barriers per
chairs.few
and
viability
areas
features),
rail. for
throughput
trucks
monitor
pedestrianyears
creating
available
freight
of
Only
or
effects
than
month(2).
locations However
attributable
by
where
as on
means
control
enormous
the ato
and
well
they
conflicting for
of
where
both
transportation.
more
capacity
remaining
vertical
small
signals the astransit
these
were
to
of
center
peace
costs safety
the and
when
problem
(Bailey,
statutes, in AFB70, Utilities
in
life Environment
stealing
regularly
specialized
problems
and
mind
The
Problem:More
mathematical There
traffic more
recently
mt/docs/benefits_am_trifold.pdf
traditional
functions; (e.g.
increasing bring
are
as
Withmodeling
transit
and
safe a
well than
proposals
transportation
large as
pedestrian
analysis
intra-
road and
importance
growing $23,000
number
security
to
and
and manage
and
paratransit and in
the
facilities of
simulation
inter-agency
vehicle
highway of transit
concerns. federal
utility
this
bicycle
designs),
and such As as
highway
improves
of
providing
factors
the
movement
Statement
containers
ground
percentage
is
Jones, the
more
regulations,
inventory
government
waterways,
installations
these
growth
mobility
methods,
·The
strategies
NAHSC
communications
their
cable.
small
10
effectsand
construction
could
motion
and
safety
critical
Stout, andof
could
Principles
are of At
capabilities
work
of and
andon
be
the
airportsthe
at
Bailey,
experiencing
although
while
the
vehicles
andquantified
was
beProblem
policy
replacement
expecting other
state
accessibility
are cost of
present
person
heavy stored,
its
Kass,
new
functions.
eventually
and
forstill
terminated.
that
impact
therail
reasons
rights
develop,
Access
prohibitive.
maintenance.
isoffering
labor/time
and
interpretations.
FAA
state
into
may
inspected,
visible
bus
of
alternative
needs
models on
crossings,
Morgan,
way
theythat
Management
Cyber
attributed
an
be
parts
to have
will
Formalized
of the
turning
bridges.
and
fundvaried
(ROW).
attract and
types
systems and
totheitInis AR010, Intercity Passenger RaEquity
intermodalism
Objectives
airport
The
vehicle
knowledge,
savings.
appropriate
across Freight congestion,
occupants
the
Because
purpose ofRail
this this
spacing
crosswalk
of wasBottom
is
economic
the onlyrecognized
research
and
stress-free
distance
studyor a with
Line
thatguess.include
conditions
is to maybasedin
increasing
Report
reliable the
Several
identify be an issued
on
are
distributed
Most
asking
particularly
1992,
spite
then
new
among
Accurate
more
of
been
probably
–running
are
the
federalCourtesy
volunteer
analysis
concerns
by
travel
models
current also
the
of
ofIssues
selling
and
services.and this
abusinesses.
lotfor
this,
expanded
meaningfully
change times of be
used
Intermodal
American
have
and about
by
locations
more
of
driverwhere
of
the of
the truck
research
needed.
where
the
Frank
for
been
future
elderly
transportation
Moreover, stolen
people
driver driver
there
programs
person
advantages
energy
or
airport
and
integrated
Broen:
Surface
Association
attention
proposed
desired
rail
suggests
items
who
competition
However,
behavior. and to
tohave
is
pedestrians.
constraints and intermediate
discern
freightvia
facilities
characteristics may that
into
vehicle
Transportation
and of
to
geometric,
even
thenot
other
become
Therefore,
State
the
estimate
athat
train
and be
driving of a ANB10, Transportation Safe Society
small
sensitive
neighborhoods
and
vertical
child's
traffic.
Transportation
human
Internet.
may
The
many final
already
purpose As theto
ground
head
service an
While
installations red
modest
destinations,
in
beof a light.
with
motion
increasing busy
Research
professionals
some
competitively
the are fluctuations
high
study and
of thereby
duringconcentrations
amount visually
Record
the
unknown, continue
revenue
isconsiderable
to served in
helping
of
1375).
explore making activity,
complex
light and totoin ANB10, Transportation Safe Society
familiar
between
regional
aspects
Efficiency
disadvantages
greenhouse
Highway
task
the
Although
operational, is
remainingnot withcar-sharing
planning
will
http://www.accessmanagement.info/10pr
staple
access central for
control
andmany
Act gasthe
require
problem
required.
automated and and
(ISTEA)
of
life. procedures
and
transit the
emissions,
each
Transportation The
traffic suppliers
hereof
busesprogramming
experimentaland
management
form is
1991,
most
control human
to
of
and for is operating
arising
understand
the
ownership
Officials
promising trucks service
and
Persons
concern
of
address
rail
The
insist
inventory
the
roadway
As DWI
earthquakes
environment.installations
MUTCD
and
investment having
has
offenders
congestion
give
security
engineering arisen
is
2003 reduced
not
This and
interface
examples
ofMPO andathat
and
would
tactics
infrastructure to
life-safety
the visual
loss
target
pollution
of
improvementsonly
with
ITE the
coincide of fields
bemobility
focused
issue
current
Pedestrian one
existence
funds with may
for
thatof
ROW
on
new
(AASHTO)
cable
have acargo
processes. the
verification.
inciples.html
agencies,
operations
the
II.
characteristics
particularly
among
alcohol
concerns
most
several
areas,
complexity
Transportation
of
attention hubs
management
airport.
RESEARCH
public-use
degradation
been the has
education
bridges.
sight as
generating
Many
sometimes
of
indicates
developed
have
grew,
Because
been
wealthiest
well
Providing
other
distance
and
Equity PROBLEM
airport;
of the their
activities
focused
that
model
difficulty
as
However, and
of
as
security in
potentially
needs
capital
interdependency
Act demand
low
athe for
including,
crossroad at uses
generation
enforcement
issues one the
prototype on
locating
at
cost
to
scale
stand-alone
area
that thestate
better
applications.
STATEMENT
the current
the
reducing
and
21st
but
facility.
in
for
safety
form
where the of
not a ABJ90, Freight Transportatio Economy
street
Traffic
of
general
may
can
space
assess many
departments
and
improvement
complexity
·Problem
program
traffic
Both
Century behave
theinfrastructure
Control
this
Access
system such
security
increased
security or little
implemented
public
(TEA of
as of Signal
“barriers”
or
solutions
transportation practices
programming
the
Management
21),one
involving
and no
while
transportation
system more
Indications
effect
to
component
passed private the
could at
reduce
human pedestrians,
the
(e.g.,
supplyon
availability
envisioned
in go
(CIP)
Overview
sectors
1998, state
the
ofuse
a –could
drunk
(DOTs)long
and
a Part
and and
of
broad
need of
in way
1997 2be
the
limited
potential
investment
The
condition
and
·driving
pedestrian objective
tested
To to, for state,
ofon
provide increased
level,
wires
signals is
test to municipality,
the develop
inside
tracks,
consistency use
freight the
they of
ain railthe
authority
high-level
cable
within have nation’s
system atfrom
anotwill
nation’s
efforts
the
results
local
video
processes
the
(video
array
and
intercity
could
technology
various
yet
likelihood
investigated.
particularly
provide
stimulation
appropriately
increasingly
in VII
intelligence,
freight
Safe, level.
improving
integrate of
private.
have
carry
advanced
history
towards
minimal
surveillance),
crashes.
itCD)
initiative,
on freight
locations with
have
transportation
data.
Accountable, the
causedof
Lighting
those
Somewhere,
of traffic
AThe
roadmap
could
these
demand
zoned
difficult. very
final
beyondand
same isin
damaging
requirements
Itexisting
operational these
as
there
flow,
private
aThe
concern
using is
generally
land
specific
Flexible,
summary
a passenger
visually
result
neighborhoods.
volume
and or
scaling
the
an there
are
the
transit
experiments
services.
and
sector
analyze
impacts
diminished.
implications
safety is
additional
mobility cluttered
in
and
is
other
accepted
performance
advanced
Efficient
prototype should
of
factor and athe
aids,
networks.
In
uses
railway
freight
the
tragic
thewill In
stageofAn ANB23T, Task Force on High Environment
lastin
given
background.
sequestration
The
evaluation
terrorists’
shear
issue.
be
guidance
specific
The affected
disconnect
improvement transportation
science
capacity
Most on
strategies
introduction willofPersons
activities
research
by how
between of
of safety
be
of
this aof
air developed
bridge
to in
issue.
that agency
having
substantial
hasdensely
assumes
make
how
public
transport may changed
columns.
Many and
low
pedestrian
the be of part
daylight,acuity
the
populated
heavy
regulations
transportation used
services of
Nearand that
and
at a ADA40, Transportation NeedsSustainable Equity
yet
that
some
ineffective
security
Again,
measures
likely
decade,
technologies.
freight most
Transportation
describe
system
2020
impact
applied
of cases,
have
that
development.in
data
as
of at
to the DWI
and
clear
it
a to
organizations
a tonearby
utility
these current
does
sharedbe crashes
tools quite
improve
productive
laboratoryEquity
differences
today,
To land
management
airports.for quest are
Act:
electric-powered
do could
In
assessing
large
dedicated
logistics
waybut A
so behavioral
for
deterioration
so would to many
and
Legacy
that
little be
on
sustainable
and
resolve a
costly
to rezoned
state
more.
requirecases,
the
for
airport in
rate in
throughout
often
cohort’s
dramatically
effectiveness
areas
fault,
higher
light have
near
vertical
rail wealth.
volume
commuter North
difficulty
over
ports. in
ground Were
reducing
pedestrian America,
the discriminating
past
motion
stations this DWI tothe
decade,
activity
havecanoccur,
over manner
put the
but
occurs
access it a the in
signal
are
issues
systems
that
nature,
to
ROW
access
Due
RESEARCH
marketing
Users
owners
these
With being
alternatives,
project’s
order
In short:
delivery to
transportation
from
the
which
signal
would
indications
that
locale.
industrial,
are
to
more
stageto
the
development
in
one
of
(SAFETEA
nationwide
and
spacing
written
far
information.
coincide
need
the
general
potential
produce
by or or
reaching
transit
providing
services
increased
PROBLEM
whiledecision
freight
to stage
to
national
more the
LU)
network
distances
with
usable
at
existing
of
be
aviation
to
added the
of
problems.
of drivers
agencies
value
credible more
Whilea aand
seniorsby
Federal
considered.
parks
cargo
and
sophistication
STATEMENT
public
makers
a2005.
period to
architecture
wire
are
it
pedestrians.
being
directly
airports
results.
visualizationsector
robust the
is
and
as
All
at hub
impact
or
Except
(see
measured
assumed
of
level
well other
others
three
the
highwayuses
NCHRP
They
impact
islocal,
offorand
asbills
on
Careful
tool ato AP030, Public TransportationSociety
current
short
column
in
the
Six
how
are
public early
property as
intoxicated
public
uncontrolled.
urban period
platforms,
inch they road
into
morning
high
follows:
lands
planners are
could with
through:safety
isof
tension
being
(A)
hasthe
which
symbols be
Limited peak
alcohol
need workforce
study.
forcross
executed
Securing
been
re-developed
1) are
more short
hours Several
prompted
or
increased
access the
permitted
and
otherandat is
durations
controls
guidance largely
tracks.
the
to studies
evenings
by
drugs.
risk for
local
and the of
all
given
attention
that
solely
hackers,
The
freight
included
state
the
system,
evaluating
537
II.
that
unaware
have
Moving
time,
after
Finally,
crossings
theregional
effectthrough
Northeast
and
report,
implementations
(e.g., data
centerline
RESEARCH
anticipated color
demonstrated
dark.
needs
public
concerns
and of
provisions
federal
AASHTO
materials
reducing
communities
up at to these
section
provides system.
can
aunskilled
fiscal
Illumination
to
to
volunteer
manage
Corridor,
minimum
the
100and
PROBLEM of be
levels
stress
by
directly
that
systems
estimatesaddressing
a2.6.2)
the
end
that
column’s
feet helpful
are
These
devoted
and
can
in
pneumatic and
of adrivers
terrorists
the
ofto
automation interact
STATEMENT
during
new
the
installing
in
can
improve
make
that tools
ashear
few
estimate
taper)
length,
up-front
emissions,
cue which
methodshave
may
only
thecapsule
pedestrian need
toroutes
over could
paved, aand
(e.g.
with,
be
theseek
the
the 20- to AP030, Public TransportationEnvironment
level.
accounting
growth
The
Yet,
accommodate
costs
and/or
the
been
to
Transit
estimated state
studies
understanding
travel
defining hope
attack
transportation
for
decisions
in states
large forThis
formed in
demand and
roadway
airport
theis
cyber
agenciesand
in inresearch
both
metropolitan for
ontypes
that unregistered
the
regional
the
growth.
design
with
models,
athroughout
the largethe
infrastructure,
try
infrastructure.
metropolitan
best toproject
number
locations
development,
of respect transportation
testingIn
anomalies
comprehension
scale make
interest
areas, other
network
the
either would,
funds:
of
toof
and
it
areas
most visitors
United
of and
as DWI
areas,
by
Without
thethat
car-sharing
the
easy
to
of to
for of
recent the
and
have
scale
the as the
year
energy,
condition
hardware
be
The
and
pipeline
capacity
relative
pedestrian
although
II. window,
reviewed
discriminate
number provision congestion,
of
technologies.
disproportionate
RESEARCH tois
to of
and
a
the
MUTCD the
to costs
of
relatively
just
paths the
driver
PROBLEM wires
software,
determine
pedestrian
retirees parking
RRD
number
that
4E.04tosafety,
reaches
shear shippers
at
new
requires302
cross so
saysvarious
ofif
spaces
signal emergency
that
strength
STATEMENT itsa
documents
DWI
technology would
peak.
additional
railroads
“Pedestrian times
they
universal
at or
of can
near
the inthe
extent
example
the
planning
crashes
options
access
States.
cyber
possible
monitoringnumber
operations,
hangars
supply,
simulation,
of the
systematically
develop
airports
U.S.
equal
response,
the
last railway
future.
for
possible,
do revenues
were
and
impact
tests agencies,
management
The
attacks
$326the for
and andfindof
and limited
taxiways
individual
that
Beverly
lifetheon
customers
their
transportation
system
billion, on compile
motor
specific may
federal
impact
identifying airports,
management;
will individual
communities
economic
of the is
costsbe for
very be
vehicles
techniques
Foundation, to aall listing
collected
locations
rezoning
intersectional
needed close
agencies
plans purchase
after
privately-owned.
vehicle; to FAA,
and
the
highway
development used
and
their
andthat
and intoof
and
where
or
being
for 2)known
the
collective
order
(even
can
from
to DOT
transit
use
potential
depend
users visit
by ato AP030, Public TransportationSociety Environment
measurement
transit
information,
lack
offenders
which
transverse
research
separately
signal
Smart
and
passengers
public
need of State
an boarding
formal
currently
head
card
documented
lands. on comeand
from
objective low
lighting
systems might
indications
duringThere points
training
reinforcement. vision
Federal
from
is being
roadways
state be
placement.
and
special
air are determined
evokes
may
governments
available
certain used
should
and
108
passenger and
transit affect
local
events publicin mixedto
several
sidewalks.
be benefit
laws,
in
market road and
ability
bulk need
disproportionate
redevelopment,
increased
landside
travel
capacity
provide
described
The
example,
the
fare
road
uses
programs
on
Under
would
aspects. Dept.
media
them. behavior
proposed
users costs
facilities,
analyses)
the has
ofprofessionals
freight ofin
that
deregulation,
equal Research knowledge
such
undercurrent
a
Defense
$492 and
research number
forcing
for
database
data, as real
incorporate utility
can
can
7-day site green
create
interactionmeasure
resources that
would
traffic
itthese
billion, isthe ofof
was
or
difficult
and the such
infrastructure
is
almost
31-day field
safety
beisbetween
hacked),
conditions
railway such
criticalto
importance
additional crashes
raised issues
400 to the to ADC70, Transportation EnergEconomy
detect,
successfully
feelings
to
safety discriminate
know
neighborhoods,
locations.
conspicuous
programs identify
within
if For
are used
elderly
and and
the
color
one
example,
perhaps intasksrespond
locating
transit
mobility
from
recognizableofunderthe should
PCPs industry
themostloss to
access
variedU.S. include
characteristics
are faults
during
being and as96
points.
lighting athe
the
regulations,
(e.g.,
transportation
based
occur.
development
arelocation
for
networks
passes,
(not
identify
of
highway many
performance
support
conducted
level
volunteer
topic
literature
A
they
using
of
under
intermodal
companies
research
·fare-related
local
conditions.
period
perspective.
of which
method
The
occur which
or
Further
communities
years
small
and
informed
transit
costs
is
in
driver and
large
purpose
activities.
multi-ride
synergies an
are
review,
project
in
a
for
will to policies,
bins)
systems
airports
modes assess
characteristics
several
experimental
facilities.
order concerned
would
research
Usability
2015
One
high
of
manufacturing
decision
facilitate
programs
cyber (i.e.,
development
into
to
that
through
necessary
to to
the
Coordinate
steps:
security
tickets.
equal
of
concentration
in
that and
alleviate
theoperation
study
increase making
opportunities
this
minimize
could
the with
pedestrian $21 may
as
areflecting
more
matter
2045 be
industryisto
their
proposed
These
environment)
ingredient
important
change
an all
will
andbe
overall
optimizing
billion
ofthe
will
of a at
be
about
alikely
urgent
has types
to(not
high-
signals
bars
in
for
to
used
Research
pedestrians
needs
identify
distribution
attribute
preventable in
interpretations
congestion.
national
accessibility.
average forJapan is
park required
Objective:
airport
potential
data
vehicle from to
innovations
Currently
facilities
with
In for transport
the
regarding
units, system and
roadway
utility
simple,
addition,
travel to
The
that timedetermine
beginning
there aof minerals,
objective
the
coordination.
smaller is
developments
engineering
continued
installations
low
transit no
cost past
of of
the
number
agencies ten
to this
have
VII
variety
one.
of
or
return
by
result
making
and
deployment.
engaging
fare
by
collect
counting
level
recently
burden
conducted
serves.
pedestrians
whether
research
controlled
years.
Such
registering in
liquor
construction to
To
aand
of
technology
that
Some
the and
program
instruments
estimating
datainjury
this
is
date,
substantive, to
once
shareholders.
additional
been to such
training
stores. is
mechanism
collaborative
with
to
materials, their
canceled
review
people for
the
ainterest
develop
crosswalk....”
models.
roadmap,
faultscan
There
serious
however, lowmultiple
maintenance
agency
believe
available
specific
usually
impact
Investment
because
would
economy,
and
to vision
appears
problem.
promising
Symbol
there awith
relationship
account
Examples
and
prior
robust
access
that
solidis be
purposes)
imposeand
appears
has to
and and to
itdesignsin
itcreate
to
wastes
colors Onewould
been
for
of
betheir
new
on
theand toor
ain a
of
1. systems
across
improvements
serve
historically
solutions.
have
without
between
Identify
different
purchased
use using
priorities
SAFETEA
railway
bridge
cost/benefits acosts).
expresseda the
models at
constellation
rely
external
(i.e.,
LU
capacity, at
simulation areas
originated
Airport
particularpublicthat
on
transit
providedwhere
analysis the
include:
while operated
could
operators
costs
and of
cargo
from
project,
stations,
models
resourcesinairport
reduce
those
additional
ofperhapsof
the hubs by
utility
have
helping or
highway
transfer
(after
shared other
facilities
changeDWI
in
should
in the the
extend
their be
appeared
the
control
be
over
question
for
shapes adriver.
better
influenced
whether
demand.
‘culture
relatively short distances
flangeway
comprehensive
amount of
areof to
is that
Such
elderly
At operate
least
alcohol’
distances
littlewhether the
standardized
money enhanced
strongly
gap and
integration
catalogueneeded
mobility
two which
placed in the
common
columns
that by
paths in data
systems
effectiveness
differences
policy are
encourages
circular
meetof
into MUTCD carrier
these
actual would
can
available:
pipes
designed
ADAAG
the need
two in
one
4E.04,
bins. not
toof
public
imbedded
crashes,
urban
relocation
encountered
the
bicycle sharing
organizations
transportation lands
core. including
level and agencies.
within
Inofmany
concept some
utility
service
trying
that the
changes
areareas, Growth
landscape
permitting
situations bicycles
with in and wherein
roadway
neighboring andof the
processes
without low-isa
centers,
impact
focused
encouragement
public
electric-powered
be
to
the
feeder
DWI.
meter
resistfound.
be
lighting
mitigate
one
requirements
and
innovations.
regulatory
Because
visitation,
overall
geometry,
property
in
operated
distances
stemming or
interest,
services
and
Anti-DWI
in
shear
minimum that In administrative
experimental
first)
diameter
the
communities using
barriers,
combined
for
thaton
glare.
injury,
for
Transit must
in
to
from data
for project,
education
unregistered
signaling,
owners theor
objected ifto
intermodal
realistic
maintaining
line-haul
the
pedestrian
brightness yield
transportationin
compiled
with
they
employ
any.sensitive
collection.
combined
benefits
signage, job
one facilities.
environments
rates
short
environments,
and
values
funds the
transit
market
meter
increasing
serve.
to path
are
from
them,
(6”)
creation
expansion
to
freight
of There
network
safety,
shear
for
most
have gaps
In
return
and
square
day
useanof
within
someone
speed
particular
thereby
changes
addition,
(traffic
ahigh
need
transport,
specimens
dealing
capacity, enough
alternative,
facilities,
In
the order
other
enforcement
rectangular
strength
often
sources
unknown do An
night
DOTs.
electric
with
not
providedto
of
has
simulator,
to andproject.
setting
in the
transit
identify
including
of and
judge
investigation
through
viewing
directly
value,
However,
to
the driven
vehicles
level
cable the
be
longevity
to
programs
conduits.
the
endanger
agencies
range The
discourage
adrivers,
concrete
using are
involved
the safe or
stage
of
questionnaire
the the
competitive
completion wire
encouraging Tokeyeffective
ofof
walked
(for
mobility
vehicle-miles
of
trains.
the
funds time
have
provided
for
often example,
questions
establishment
were
operating
thean
date,
and
physical
withare ofa up
more
interchange
access
to
available
not
the no
capture
cooperate
survey,
with
ayoung
exposed final
begin
Successful
these in
to
generally
vulnerable system
the
to
that
byother data
ITE toof
and
of
and private
Numerous
obstacles
the cargo
aircraft
improve management
when toautomobiles
hub.
mobilitymodels
slow
performance measures used for scoring, theyAnd of
for have
in
had yet
utility to
no
seniors). beenaccess
automated
other developed
installation
legitimate these
areas,
Anticipated
Problem: An emerging public policy issue AT030, Agricultural Transpor Sustainability Environment
that
This research will likelyshould have significant address the and ADC80, Alternative TransportSustainability Sustainable
potentially
numerous far-reaching
technology and impacts market is the
The
growing first interestgoal of this inbarriers
andproject usefor is to
of study and ADC70, Transportation EnergEconomy
renewable
opportunities
understand allofand aspects of consumer the use of
The
and
specialized purpose
bio-fuels. vehicle The this goal research
markets of reducing
as is to follow
U.S. ADC70, Transportation EnergEquity Economy
behavior—how
up
dependence on the NRC on they
committee
foreign getenergy information
work on
sources CAFE on
introductory
fuel Problem consumption, markets what andthey “launching do with it, ADC50, Historic and ArcheoloEnvironment
and
while
When
pads” provide
promoting
determining
for analyses
alternative domestically
the ofpotential
fuel different
and produced
advanced effect a ADB40, Transportation DemaEquity
Problem
how
alternatives
renewable it influences to
fuels CAFE.suchtheirAn aspurchase evaluation
ethanol decisions,
and ofbio-
project
technology
how much maythey have
vehicles value onincludingan the archaeological
fuel the
savings, and ANB40, Traffic Law EnforcemSociety
Problem:
different
diesel
site,
following. have
indirect The
alternative
1. A societal
considerable
effectscomprehensive CAFE
as fuel costs
well impacts and
structures
asasked benefits
directfor on
The
why
of
would types
they
red light
agricultural/food bemust doof questions
not
cameras
performed value
markets, have being
including, beensavings
ruraland minimally
butdata of
not the
PROBLEM:
impacts
identification
travel demand The be
and models data
considered. sources
characterization are expanding of ABC30, Performance Measu Sustainable Equity
full
evaluated.
limited
communities,
collection
Encapsulating
vehicle
useful to
market
lifeThe
gallon
techniques
of
the
a
atarget.
issue
site
segments
vehicle.
environment
underofused red
An that
The
to
filllight
example project
and
measure
material
are camera
being iswell or
PROBLEM:
beyond
should
usage
modification mere
provide
affects Transportation
totraffic
our information
the society projections
existing performance
that
in multiple
CAFE wouldThe ABC30, Performance Measu Environment
and
transportation
outputs
capping
considered
management or
it withoutcomes
as is systems/infrastructure.
concrete
first now ofwell
applications
a thecan services
provide
established for or
some
transit
help
Statement
dimensions
structure.
benefits ridership.
researchers and of that Purpose
success Decision-makers
assess
include of and the consumer’s
Need:
intersection
these renewable Aare recent now ADA10, Statewide Multimodal Equity Environment
products
direct
alternative
and
concerned
value surface
accepted
of a
fuel transportation
fuels,
about protection
best
savings. advanced
the practice technical
It should butagency
for there
conventional
also are
include
report
injury
fuels
Description
provides,
many in by
crashthe
variables the of
typically US
impacts,
marketplace
Need
that Regional
includeand
may jurisprudence Plan
depends
Research
snow
indirectly Association
on
plowing, affecta ABE50, Transportation Dem Sustainable
fuels,
establishing
assessment
an
predicts and
assessment that advanced
accountability
of most the
of how of vehicle
effectiveness
the much and
nation’s technologies.
energy driving
of pricing
implications,
•long
Objectives
highway Fuel
archaeological
This list
shouldeconomy-based
ofand dynamic privacy
bridge
include deposits impacts,systems,
uncertainties
reconstruction
the from
number financial
where
construction that
andHolistic can
type ABC30, Performance Measu Equity
RESEARCH
results
techniques,
security inconcerns PROBLEM
transportation
transit-oriented might STATEMENT agencies. development, Environment
population
impacts,
each
dramatically
contracts,
and
of use
vehicle manufacturer
ofandetc.growth
the
sales; stress
alter There
finished
quantity
and
issues
gets
economic are aaffect
economic including
fleet-average
likely
transportation
of fuel
consumer
viabilityother driver
and
or
approaches
greenhouse
decisions.
Statement
expansion
safety
miles concerns.
per• The
of to
gas
between performance
Attribute-based consequences,
second
Purpose Little now goal
and and
available is
Need: management
to
the
standards, peak
assess Recent
year
research ADA10, Statewide Multimodal Equity
long-term
A
less
structure.
consumed;
Highway
require growing
traditionalthat sustainability,
number
Trafficcosts; uses
performance the
congestion of that communities
type including
have and
will and
measures notlevel
likely are
been of
and
spreading,
ways
requirements
2050
has
such
transportation to
will
focused
as increase
take
weight, and on detailed
within
place
a public
size,holistic
efficiency in SAFETEA-LU,
and 10 equity
awareness
emerging
approach
class.
(both into of
plus
toand the
thethe
PROBLEM:
incorporating
considered.
subsidy;
become There
suitability
worse TDM
There in As is
the no
applications
may
of consensus
vehicle evenas bedemand
and insome on
fuel how
regional that ABC30, Performance Measu Environment
considerations
environmental
link
increased
“mega-regions.”
evaluation
The
out
risk
long-range
are
between
ofgoal
management
measured is
processing emphasis
of
to fuel be
justice
automated
provide
transportation
by byfuture
integrated
consumption
facilities).
should
others,
analyses.
metropolitanfederal
comprehensivetraffic
be and
including
into
Investment
integrated and
and all
devices.
land-use areas global
state
local in
In
PROBLEM:
for
functions
warming. evaluating
characteristics highway from effects,
Privateto
facilities
Different policy specialized
tollconstruction
increases roads,
development
strategies market;
the
and
should leasing
supply
and and ABC20, Management and Prod Equity
officials
grapple
This
analyses
ethanol
into
planning
planning,
methods
distinction
of publichaswith
performance on
led
that transportation
processing to
processes.
health,
and between
assets
this analyses
could
equipment
to
increasedbe
plants
metrics.
economic,
private This
light-, used focusing
are
security,
population
Yetto
throughout
iscorporations,
due
etc.
medium-, key inon
explain
risk The part abe
result the
use
and to
(or
long
The
assessed,
Problem:
in
and
single capacity)
the range
activity-based
need
compete
affect including,
Bicyclists
to remains
planning forreach
orExcavators, the
dimension. to
modeling
but
report
out stagnant.
means programming
not they
to“SmartaThe
toapproach
limited
broaderPeak
are
payoutcome to,
for timesethas
the ANF20, Bicycle TransportatioEnvironment
each
Midwest
management
the
of
components.
heavy-duty
privatized
spreading, other alternative;
growing U.S.
or busless has
is
emphasis
applications.
loss an that
already
traditional
services
of productivity is,
increasingly on
funded howincreased the
performance
cranes, by
during concept
popular
Growth,”
graders,
public farm-
budgeting,
emerged
consumer
harassed
of
infrastructure
is
works stakeholders
that the
and as
by program
law
the amotorists
education potentially
in
required
enforcement
impact the andcampaigns,
when
Statewide
on to project
more
meet
cost, bicycling
community delivery,
suitable
Planning
increased on
Problem
gate
way
sustainable
measures
etc.,
funds,
congested tocorn
can betterStatement:
prices
contractormay
weighperiods identify,
development, and
result
80-100 leasing
and land assess,
inmetric allocated
benefits and
arrangements,
underutilization prioritize,
other
tons. to to
Effectscorn of ABE25, Congestion Pricing Equity
system
tool
advertising,
the
process.
demand,
and
manufacturer
The for
roadways. operations,
answering
policymakers
current new social
Statewide
system Motorists
partnerships
flexibility,are maintenance
these
marketing,
Plans
of provided
funding types
often
fuel can and andof
believe
provide
a
with
consumption
our and
greater
roadsa that
the
production
planning
sustainable
from
PROBLEM: communicate
vibration, as
practices grain
transportation,
Most compaction producers
future
that
transportation strive risks, the
or to respond
andintegrate
agencies make to
2.
and
existing
monitoring
questions
outreach
bicyclists
primary
level
series
reduction,
and
market
decisions
trip
environment,
Anon
destabilization
assessment
of ofand
highways
reduction
capacity
tothan
are
means on.
and
collaboration
research
prices,
tosafety, notdoes
maximize
All
the
schoolteachers
to
leading
strategies
quality
of
of
during
reporting are
entitled
outcomes
and not
subsurface
manufacturer
traditional
define, will
of
either
offbe
inequities
toprovide to peak
results.
and
describe
increased
opportunities
into
life,
use being
required
that
andasoils
periods
trip-basedcan In
roadways
between
sufficient
social and
from cost
and to of ABC10, Strategic Manageme Economic
have
willingness
discussed
are
addition,
approach.
Task some strategic
1: Model or
of to
holistic
When the plans
develop,
being current put
approaches
assessing
Assessment in place.
manufacture,
in place
system the
and Some
need in
relative
Data use
states
to sell, Development
administrators.
or
document
balance
contradict
manufacturers.
capacity
production
minimize
comprehensive
equity.
excavation
these
and
that
plans
service
roadways
There such
transportation
or andquality
for
threats.
areas may
various
Similar
that
outreach
misinform
To help
of
livestock/meat
vision
possible.
their Performance
be of cases,
bicyclists
goals
service
creative
overarching
alternative
efforts
the
illustrate
regional
Vibrations
such
foruses
are
outlined
impact and
the
all
producers as
guideline
fuels who
that
fromandofat ABJ40, Travel Survey MethodEconomy
legallythe
across
management
reflect
merits
Needs the
all nation.
the
these challenges.
key two But
performance
types how aof does
Transportation
modelingareasone ofair AT040, Transportation of HazEconomy
increasing
entitled
provide
both
this
Description
various
want
who
measurement
community
are
pile
for
advanced
evaluate
authorities
law
not toof
regional
utilize
driving
business
toABTB:
widely
public
use
representation
enforcement
impacts,
use of
them, and
mobility
vehicle
“The and isshould
the
corn/soybeanknown
construction
operations
Deal”
concern
athe state
Need
and
vital and
technologies
organizations to
not
tool.
analyses
or oflevels.
traffic
management
while
with
asopen
accessibility.
may
shoring
ascertain not
criteria
cross-section
should
some
to bicyclist
Traditional
congestion
inputs toand
around ifhave
or itand
ahave doistool
bridge
niche the not
fair
concern
approaches,
pollutants,
usage.
of
system
In
include
has organizations
allgrown50 Shareincluding
should
responsibility,
states
likely to one
The and and
manufacturer
such system
mustbe
Roadway
U.S.
an agenciesmake
evaluated
programming
extent and signs
territories, the facility
that
response.
that have the
building
decreased
that
been must
considered, economic
include the
and viability
predictable
therefore for ethanol
results
unlikely
Description
footings
use
market
in
country
conditions,
assessment
There
assessed
been
not
authority
Costs
flow
new
plants
of
Research
them
both
ofinstalled
traditionally
of
roads
decisions
can
over
the
isthatand
red
at
for
and
commerce
in by
ofexceed
all.
an
short
abroad
congestion
based
considerable the
relevant
light
developed
in
this by
service
itself
the
What
extended
topic
andNeed
many
been on
camera
forces
have
includes
will
design,
are
long-term,
not and
discussion
lessons.
area
the created
period
explored
only mobility,
jurisdictions
considered.
delivery
not enforcement
the
solve
construction
would
factors
how of
on
movement
the
by
time.
and
well
Inthe
identify
that
inthis anto AT040, Transportation of HazEnvironment
be
Emergency
earthquakes,
make
What
especially
applied
safety,
PROBLEM: implemented.
the
factors
cost to
capacity responders
strategic which
change
the
effectiveness
Communicating public?
improvementmay
planningthe have cause
Isas there
to long
effort
willingness
well one
strategies
funding as stressed
behardertoor a
the
inadequacies
A
attempt
context
expectations
include
of
A
problem. models
variety
flammable,
market-based
production/processing
and
TDM
OBJECTIVE:
the
liquefaction.
worthwhile?
sustain
set
as of
well operation to
of
direct
strategies
importance presence
models
as
replicate
ofRecent
several
of
research
reduce
increasedwill
Tocosts
ofand the
Liquefaction
Howthat
need
explosive,
system, conflicts
researchof
transportation
identify
of in can are
having
the
DOTs
observed
four-step
tools
attention
Transportation
to be
implementation,
expectations
compatible
and
or
should
caustic,
suchaccess
between
has
occurs
transportation
niche the as
use
travel
trip-based
and
revisited
shown
market? and
facilities
public existing
to
because
Demand with
and
real that ABC10, Strategic ManagemeSociety
in
to
conditions,
modeling
considered
bicyclists
concern
light
PROBLEM:
potential
biological
continuously
the measure
decision-makers of
public and
about
this areas
but
process.
for
shifting
Governing
negative
materials
and also
each
motorists
the
variable
key whysuch Atthe
securityit
goal,
demographic
reactions
that by
transportation as
is
present environmental
models’
including
although
Network
pose
manufacturer offrom nearly
the use
and focus
nation’s all
of
is an use ABC20, Management and Prod
the Sustainable
lower
while
complementary
data
time
of
agencies
sector
Management
factors. changes input
accounting
sources
or can nearbetterin
use prices.
to
real
pore
andto to
use for
support
time
assessThis possible
long-range
pressure
their
Transportation isthe
hazardous particularly
strategicand
equityunintended
planning,
innovative materials
reduced for
System
critical/important
sensitivity
urban
groups,
these
transportation
political
emerging
public
fundamental
incentives
stakeholders areas
signs
due surveys,to
model
tois
landscape. usedifferent
generally
privacy
risks
(feebates).
do this
and
systems,
of
not to
to how increase
have demand
approach,
experimental
issues,
the• viewed
itstateis
public
Tradable
a now
sense DOTs
indirect in
as
if one
moreanet
they
credits
of andcosts
the are to
complicated
consequences
reasonable
RESEARCH
of
identification
effective
planning
3.
those
Management
transportationother
As or assessment
involved?or
stressless
process when
PROBLEM
goals of those
traditional
information
between
methodsOr and
of
allocations considering
established
fuel
are STATEMENT
product
the
indecisions.
solid
provider
an for
performance
forvariables
has the
respondingTDM,
particles
to
effort
not improvetotoo
been and ABC20, Management and Prod
Equity
management
form
economics.
stopgap
important
other
related
accidentally
determine
comparative
energy another
tomeasure
transportationto
collection
their
use/utilizationor policies
engage
costs andatand
deliberately
impact best.
of and
alternative
organizations
providers
and fines,
with
benefits strategies.
This
air and
released.
fuel of methods
hostile
are
pollution otherat
various Yet,
At
planning
The
measures
to
generated
business
willingness
complex
mitigate
Problem
easy
the
are Intermodal
hazmat toresearch
policy
in the do. techniques
and
the by
by
operations
to
In the
different
negative
the
sensitivities
experimental Transportation
researchers,
transportation
establish presence
past, and
and thatand
consequences
While
oflong tools
designers
incidents.
deliver of
prevent
standing
some
activity-based
stage, that
Efficiency
liquid.
maintain such better and
This
It
this
asof a is ADC50, Historic and ArcheoloSociety Environment
environment
multiple
More
delivering
issues
the
economy-based
solutions
aspects
OBJECTIVE:
successfully
Act same
(ISTEA) reveledgovernmental
for toservices
time,of can
traffic
ethanol
To
integrate
1991is
through
the deter
needed
systems
identify and
continuous
congestion,
when
authorized
TDM bicycling
levels
programs
analysis
from to
and compared that
better of
flow
attribute
the
measures on deal
once
existing
particularly
body ofwith of
into
practitioners.
need
often
services
fuel
approach?
current
research
relationships
models
activity-based
roadways. also
caused to
infrastructure
and
havehasincludes
their
As by
future
been
with
not PPP’s
and severe
customers?
been the
and evolve,
congestion
politicians
done
tour-based desire
shaking,
produce,
fully on can to have
and
we
levels.
environmental
who
vetted. models, have can
expect
This
with
This
understand
exclusively
research.
these
based
congestion
fossil
available
planning
establishment emergency
research
hazardous
not
fuels, how
furnished
Benefits
consider would
pricing.
including
research
approaches of response
Statewide
ahow of
materials focus
taxes by
red
Therefore,
all
Nationaland or and
on
light
is
production,
risk defining
Transportation
government. camera
essential
other
management
documents.
Highway itto would tobe AFB50T, Task Force on ContexSustainability
sustai
At Sustainable
definitive
cause
OBJECTIVE:
distribute,
more
What
performance
been
research
with Historic a sediments
critical
has
engaged
few material
and
been
will ones Determine
Preservation sell
assessment
evaluate to
realized
measures,
in identification
mix;
various
transportation
being the much
professionals
the in andmanykey
fuels
environmental
implemented relative like
realistic areas
have athese
and
and is
been
management,
Plans
the
enforcement
mechanisms
valuable
transportation,
techniques
RESEARCH
Additionally,
System Chicagowill
strategic to
(NHS) need Summer
may
research,
and
PROBLEMthetolawto
functions
directed enforcement,
incorporate
include
processing,
methods
research
meet TRB of
primarily
design,
STATEMENT
defense meeting,
reductions
the
have
would regional
national
develop
distribution atbuildings
been highlight inand ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
information,
liquid.
components
markets.
representations?
that
owners
management
relied
effectiveness
applied.
Objectives: There
significant
on and What
to
Given e.g.,
may
of
residents
sway
This of factors
capacity
systems trip-
the the
also
strategic
What
decisions
research and
emergencespecific
inbe
change
and do long
plans.we
expansion
historic
particular
towards
activity-based
project chemical
term
Identify
the
need
of effects
to
activity-
would: do 1)
international
priorities
William
property
economy
consumers
pilot
and
integrated
Research
effective
requirements, test
passenger and
Eggers,
damage
a
is national
into border
instead
needed
characteristicsperspectives,
who
national
vehicle costs,
performance
serve of security,
along
public
to human
defense.
manufacturers
consumption.
document
interstate of while
with
education
TDM ports
measures.
and former
costs
Risks still
best
elements ofanddue
to
name
from
transportation
willingness
to
Problem:
opportunities
often
environmental improve
transportation.
models
based
Survey of
vibration
express
and a material
Many
atforeign
members to
our
answering
tour-based and
agencies
sustain
assessment
pedestrian
concern
are impact
In of that
compaction
limited
aon presence
political
the theseabout
areasis
models,where
due
public more
injuries
and the
system
(air
policy to caused
strategic
in their
and
potential
quality,
surveys
regarding by
thatofis ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
entry
considering
Mayor
to
public
should
outreach
Specifically
practices
included
interregional
descriptive injuries forof
health
include or geographic
Indianapolis
initiative
of
in deaths,
and the
recommendations
transit
long-range
than travel, cargo,
safety
typical economic
agencies
and and
reductionsequity,
Steven
congestion
and are
provide
shipping more.
managed,
landand system
Goldsmith
in
efficiency
and use
an Many
stress
pricing
local
names plans.
use
plans
market?4.
approaches
fatalities
environmental,
damage
noise,
constantly
questions.
(whether
their
This
of of
these the
have
wetlands,
perceptions
research transportation
occur
caused made
The on
changing
household
agencies wouldcapacity
at
this
right
by a
etc.),
on
and significant
midblock
emerging
vibration
of
with
travela
bicycling
focus of
way facility
specialized
comprehensive
new
organizations onsurveys, positive
locations
and
fromtopic?
players
on over
financial
identifying with
transit
have and AFB50T, Task Force on Contex Sustainable
connectivity,
co-authored
associated
minimized,
the
that
The
improvements
transportation
interconnected
such
time. system,
attempts
movement
as on flammablewith
and aand
equity tobook
to other
driver
mitigated (or
highlight
toward
agencies
systemevaluate offairness),
liquids, the
ofsystem
safety bysame
the
alternative
coordinating
principal
n.o.s. wide
concerns,
systems
full
transportation andname,
One fuelsgoals
for
arterialto is
impact
markets
and
constraints,
transportation
framework
in
on-board
roadways;
the
little a without
hyper
tangible
or no business
tosurveys,
absorb
media
2)
historycrosswalks.
thus
and construction
determine
benefits one
etc…)
of operations.
maximizing
approach
society, of
working or the more
the
musthas
community activities.
existing
need
not
reasonsbe
with Look
new yet to
designed
statefuels
whyand
been
and
presented
handling
potential
spectrum
occurring
III.
facility
improve
routes
promising objectives.
other
RESEARCH and
design,
to for
theof
atthe
issues
serve
step topic
moving
gaming
acosts,
PROBLEM
time
safety Conflicts
revealed
construction
major
toward to
when
and a
hazardous
(loopholes).
benefits will
full
STATEMENT house
through
and
agriculture
convenience
population
realizing and arise impacts.
these of
analysis
materials
centers, ofto ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
specifically
and
OBJECTIVE:
underused
Expressing
fully
communicate
Objective
in
persons
involvement
DOTs ways vehicle
developed
in that
who
long-rangefor
their
capacity
meet
as cases
technologies
Purpose
believe concerns
transportation
for
part the where
has of
integrating
of
system needs
bicyclists this
become
project funding
simultaneously
before project
planningfunding
of do such
delivery the
not was
is
and
between
conference
of
with
The
producers
Pedestrian
operation.
pedestrian
international
goals
An existinghighly
first
would
alternative the
step are
crashes
access
be need
attendees.
research.
developed
in such
increasingly
border the
method to to
near anprotect
The
Revenue
safety
transit.
crossings,
availability to effort
elementary
reliant
mitigate long-
prototype,
and
In generation
would
ofports, on
particular, be
and
adverse a
increased
RESEARCH
on
address
Objective:
paramount.
beginning
environmental
needs
efforts,
belong
including
prioritizing a sustainable
these
clearly
and
on due
ofPROBLEM
Use aand
would
responsibility
the
processes. tofactors
roadway strategic
basis.
questions:
case
project simply
most STATEMENT
study What
they
into and so
likely
feel planning.
analysis
may factors
performance
that be
ownership request
everyone
designed
way; Select
and/or 3)in ANF10, Pedestrians Sustainable
distance
which
from
accountability
review
multimodal
middle
case
airports,
electronic redis
studiesof mobility
still
light
schoolsstate,
public emerging
freightcamera
should
shipping features.
local,
are versus
transportationdocument
papers andand
transportation
a particular reliable
enforcement
The being
excellent
regional
or access
shaped
concern
how
facilities,
electronic isother
efforts tois
·effects
key
Pedestrians
change
regression
costly
management
can
This
differently,
Results
determine
CSS
regional
becoming
considered
three How
processes from
the
monitoring;
understand
research ofand priority
NCHRP
moreas
transportation
and
capacity
prevalent
analysis programs.
item
ifcompared
bikeway
localand
aaccess
large
the
used
business
separate will
synthesisof
identify
are
expressed
message
outcomes.
activity commercial
tobe fleets
designation
in how
projects,
areas
public-private
design
Specific
geared
surveys on
centers
issue
or
during
is
the CSS
The
that
(i.e.,
critical. vehicles
issues
toward
usedof and
located
public might for AFB50T, Task Force on ContexSustainable
record
that
efficiencies
for
agencies
and
manifests.
than
safety,
(buses,
consumers
partnerships
characteristics have
communities
other of safety
archaeologicalbeen
have
major
With
preservation, to
tractor-semitrailers,
in inthese
of in
the
state these
undertaken.
across
cooperated
travel
midblock and
evolving
data
economic
markets
DOTs? the systems
compete
destinations.to
recovery,nation
to address
wireless
tractor-double
locations
How create is
do largely
that
in
whichThe
wethat
One
construction
include
OBJECTIVE:
comparing
trip-based
multi-disciplinary
roadways
benefits
More
near
sector
be
due of the
the
research
critical
considered
toto and
the would lesser
impacts
state their
appropriate
Identify
sensitivities
models.
diligence include
is
transportation
DOTs
either used
concerns
teams successful
This
motorists
required of a tools
of environmental
task
increased
provide
cost
shippers trip
revealed
to orare
in the
and
shall
perceptions
ascertain
facilities. usually
ways
services.
benefit,
andthe a for
activity-
need New
Transportation
global
want
challenging
provision
communication
can
development,
trailers,
sustainable
know
result be markets
this
in provide
costly,
and
an of
and mid-block
an investments
and safe
interconnected
technology
isdifferences.
increase wherethe
environmental
tractor-triple
demand? appropriate
conditions
controlled
in pedestrian
How
and crashes are
today,
trailers)
does
what becoming
for
system
burial
protection,
and
are ofwas ADD10, Transportation and Environment Economic
congestion
more
measures
quantifying
based
highlight
for
of
occurrences
strategic
protocols
The
depending
receivers passionate
bicyclists’ models
establishing
Governing to
such management
and
approaches
mayon
working include
to
entitlement
of be and
articulating
the
guidelines
financial
by
one’s required
Network
closely the
following
and
perspective.such tool
sought-after
for
partnering,
to
with to the
use
methodologies
model box
aengageprogram
key
the the
federal, is
uses tolling
increasingly
This
investment
walking
crossings.
to
responders
One research
includeimportant and Whenincomplex.
principal
could effort
cycling
ruralarea agencies
query would
road
to Decision
arterials
of school. and
shipment
research provide
do and A
not makers
isrecent
other a
to Development
significant
land
routinely
competition
sources
injuries.
remedies
and
benefits/costs
sensitivity
development
roadway;
improved
for
multiple
third
state,
must
synthesis
use,
congestion
the
structuring
party
and
take
forA4)
of
sites
etc.)
interact
sample
more this
appropriate
areas:
public
MPOs, within
of
provide
providers,
local
into efforts
and
of
andunder in determine
information?
time
pricing
makingof
relations,
local
regulatory
account
the
these
approach
multi-disciplinary
other
soliciting highway
mid-block
consumingof urban
transportation
including
undertaken a
markets
existing
and expedited
and
wider
fill
strategies
road
deferring
input andtheand
range
or
nationally
affect
andlevel
teams
from
private new
of of ADD10, Transportation and Economy Economic
transportation
national
coordinate,
highways
databases
explore
·encapsulation
that
network.
this
pedestrian
infrastructure.
costly. have
capacity?
What study
the helped
The transit
providing
and economic
crashes estimated
infrastructure
access
under
increased
5.
indicators H
However, stops
agenciesconnections
(taken are that,
may
shipment-specific
asphalt
development
demand achieve
used
therefrom maintenance
orbe from placed
to
cement.
to
is for
police
aofmeasure1991
major in Development
detail
transportation
Efforts forto considering
evaluate investments. the environmental
economic Use case
Task
including
recommendations
project
these
agencies,
sector,
Objective:
enforcement
factors.
and
is
to
locations
intermodal
material
Some
strategic
freight
success
reports)
growing,
2:new
critical.
consequences1999, Data
NGO’s
These
internationally
to
who
schedules,
and
more
literature AsThe
that
goals aCollection
partner
terminals,
information
transportation
shouldprovide
national
needs
the
and study
agencies.
factors
result,
than
cause
of
and exists
be
state
otherby
1,190to
sustainable
to increase
agencies.
should
many
pedestrians
in
and
be
DOT
include
both
including
productivity-enhancing
objectives.
evidence
analyzed.
momentum on
coupled
aresearch
Survey
organizations
children
near-real
vibration
part
in
that
The
utilize motorist
the
successful effective
In
with
Factors
within to
airports.
time.
PPPs aNeeds
effects
agedthese
researchpolicy
cross
impacts
the less
thatand
are 5- ADD10, Transportation and Economic
performance
studies
development
Price
of
teams,
acceptance
should
planning
commonly
analysis
Problem
of
unsuccessfulABTB:
transportation
transportation as
sensitivity,
how
defineat well
format these
of
this factors
associatedhow as
consequences
pricing tosuch
on-road develop
solutions,teams
their
mega-regional
compare
systems at as
with
projects various
in
input new
should
bicycling.
etc.
as of
tolling
federal
a techniques
stages
This
can
scale.
status
amarket
to stimulant or
operate,
highlightbe
and quo of of AFD20, Pavement Monitoring, Development
Environment
questions
13
the
With
Such
to
innovations
implementing
desire
6.
bringing
should
government were
the
An street
Objectives tobekilled
apassage
system
built
assessment arise
at
make
ais included
more
and ofand regarding
challenging
would
environment;
that the
are
strategic
urban of more
competitive
transportation
Benefits in National
the be
being areas
the athan
plans, how
mid-block
reasonable
however,
introduced
potential more
analysis
entities103,000
the
Highway
what for not
were
walkable
include
toand into
the
for
transportation
research
incorporated
Guidance
state
In
local
PHMSA
growth
best both
theplanning,
congestion-pricing
what methods the
government.
development
government
practices on
promulgates
and asquantification
closely development,
in
the ainvestments
of
and the type
cost applications
engagement
related
withoutformation
and
lessons and
of of toand delivery
frequently
the
decision-making
introduction
red
enforces
growth. learned are
of the
light They most
currentabout of
also
adoption
children
locations,
System
The
alternative
regarding
existing U.S. in of this
andtoalternative
Designation
transportation
transport
the age
mid-block
higher-cost
archaeological group
Act fuel
of
system suffered
crossingstechnology,
1995,
satellite the
carries injuries
near
trackingUS aof ABJ40, Travel Survey MethodEconomy
successful
and
various
discipline
traffic
explore
operation.
communication.
come
Sensitivity
Data
useful
NCHRP
Statewide
arrangements
technological
camera
regulations
include
public
resultant
(not
sustainable,
volume,
upfor that
collection
15-32, ways
specialized
to
against
to
team
goals
enforcement
the
messages
involving crop for
these
option
effects and
to asystems.
have
pedestrian
Provide
transit-oriented
efforts get
markets
programs
effectiveness,
Quantification
the
school and
advances and
production theand
glaring
safe
on to
agency
resulted
must
objectives, evaluate
unique
the in
possible
Ato
volume,
information
gap
transportation
communications
buses) be
pavement
record
environment
patternas
framework
andofstaff
--in
serve
and the high
services,
its
setting
roles the
how in
as
lack
for
shifts, on ofof
transit
Congress
merchandise
and
transportation
should
engaged
expectations
launching
as
number
performance.
Problem
the
of they
This use
information may
communication
beare
synthesis
ofofin not
developed
provided
padsthe
argued
travel
Statement
marketingimports
for A be
context.
will
on lanes,
growing
theequipped
implementation
for engineersthe
and specific
and
provide valued
technology. Little
benchmarks
broader
are
approaches
flows travel and
numbernot with
criteria
at
to
transportation
of well
no
and
use However,
other
simply
speed,
goods to of
ofarea for
over
use
states
and ABJ40, Travel Survey MethodEquity
development
coordinated
should
Benefits
priorities,
state,
OBJECTIVE:
management,
alternative
hazardous
and
programs.
private
pedestrians on the
regional
the of
investmentteam’s
andCSS So
policy
materials.
quality
The or patterns
with and
pavement the
research
bicyclists performance
identification
and
what options
of
inthe
local does
The
life and
methods results
entities the
this
design,
that of
regulations
within
would
transportation
during resulting
used
of
new
meanincluding
include
theand
identify
school this
within toto
are
adequate
identifying
$1
widespread
research
should
strategic
alternative
privatization
traffic,
are
agencies
While
proactively
people. trillion.
transportationconsidering
a be
crosswalkinfrastructure
with
number
This connector
But
exists
established
plan? fuels what
availability
efforts?
recast
is as
This
most and
necessary
andof to
professionals
presence,
the how
research
or roads
happensfor
vehicle
efforts
commonJust (e.g.,
ofbackground
toelectronic
understanding
implementing
public’s to
as median
serving
to
effectively
project
to
technologies.
warning
integrate these
provide
importantly,
perception
in urban bills
will
signs,
and
transit
develop
satisfaction
research
funding
Problem
this
state
other
various
harmonized
served
proven competing
equipment/facilities
travel DOTsridership
activity-based
would
transportation
by of
partnerships.
Statement
and
implementations
the
practices
hours[1]. with team consequences
help
public
contextthe
transportation
In on ain members
focus models.
Additionally,
transportation
is
management
standards
gaining
2004
to ship an
of
CDCthe be
important
red
inputsystem. In
research
light
and
nationwide forsome
the
tools, In ADD30, Transportation and Environment
crossing
various
imports
of
evaluate
the
produce
What
efficient,
·tolling lading
driveways/curb
guidance
freight
since
of
studies, thebroad are
Whatand islands,
types
once
issues
investmentswould
avibration
economic
forset
effective,
the
transportation
though are of
they
congestion
theofthe
factors
into pedestrian
major
require
how
cuts,
data enter
impacts,
and
evaluation that
different
transportation intermodal
consequences
to’s safe
pedestrian
pricing
environmental
onservices the
substantial
based crossing
increase
region-wide United
long
transportation
ofPPP term
on
projects
the
and models
crossing ofmay
real
this
planning
FTA
cases,
measured.
for
research
Increasingly,
outcome
providers?
the
camera
guidance
some
effective New
this
most
renewable/bio-fuel,
survey urban
cases,
of Starts
project.
should
of
often
enforcement
message The
What
parents, areas
changes
this
the ridership
NCHRP
define
research.
are
neglected
international ability have thein
to
development,
traffic-related
and the
to and
project
spent
model’s
how full
neighborhood
impediment
achieve
organizations
locate user-benefit
8-68
rangenet
a
different best
and
danger of uses
to
signals,
Problem
facilities.
States?
changes
effects
these
case
potential?
systems
and
signals,
such
potential
at
mitigation
products
freight the variations
as urbanetc.).
Statement
For
Current
in
innovations.
of
experiencesto
nearby
HOT for the
vibration
Are
delivered
movements are Lack
commercial
accommodate
lanes
level and(or
way
some with
building
vibration
often haveof
To
and
which
(Orski,
by
is coordination
currently
business
fuels
drivenbe
adamage
also been
stateaviation
compaction
assured
strategic these
and
are
setbacks,
Ken, by
commonly accessible)
is most
made
DOT now that
planning.
users.
Innovation
to
permitting onits ADD30, Transportation and Environment
airports,
historic
andover
applicability
considerable
meet
potential
and
implementation
reductions
such
transportation
crafting
types
was the the
commercial
limitations
asof the needs
partners
second in
bio-fuel amounts
United in
societal
public of
area
is
project
most the this
and
data
Nations,
message
subsidies of
design
costs
in
commontopic.
the
public amoney
collection criteria
are
sector
associated
willthe
particular
content impact to
being
reason thatobtain
and
costs.andplace
the
between
One
the
data
conducted
archaeological
research
technologies
However,
appropriate
character
Briefs:
Problem
buildings.
the
and
partners.
deficient. pastof
primary
sources
resource the
News transit
of most
and
Statement criteria
encompasses
there do
for
the
Analysis
Itenvironmental
decade,
New will
agency agencies
could
sites
suitableis powerful
not
public limited
surrounding
provide
there
research were
answer
nor entail
only the
“Highway the
still
decisions, is and
asfactors
knowledge
transportation?for
guidance follows
this
some
issues
exists
needed local
effectiveness
these
land question
Tolling sort
use,
a to in for ofetc. ADD30, Transportation and Sustainable
has Environment
Equity
data
should
proposed
transportation
The
with
International
depends
communication
freight
cited only
industry
red
for and
be to
applied
and
light
on
transportation
not find
is
the violators.
Civil
allowing out
implemented
agencies
ripe
consent to
techniques with
Aviation that
identify
children
system in justice
the
examples.
of in state
most
particular?
Organization,
residents
including
andurban
to walk
theof the Is
toas
engineering
reinforcing
major
with
regulatory
of
important
markets?
about
·reachedBy site
Researchers
evaluating
significant anyintermodal
burial
the
How
identifying
transportation
Part
develop 1 – the
ways to departments
auto-dependent
significant
requirement
whether
gap
Research as
decision
interaction
do you
Tipping
in of a
factors
fields
in facilities:
degree
mitigation
measure
understanding
agencies that
using makers
of
with
Point.”).
such
historic for
these
develops
may
existing may
asaof
some
measure.
the in increase
development
certainty
two
significant
In
buildings
not thehigh-
addition,
a data
have
resources new
user This
are
sensitivities,
practice
III.
appropriate
areas
this
Consider,
within
effective RESEARCH
the
agricultural/food
from as
aprecluding
truly
that models
solutions
new
just
International such
area.
delivery
school[2]. PROBLEM
partners
at model
the as
require
Forto effects
time
mechanisms.
markets The in
instance,
Maritime additional
STATEMENT
adata
transportation
that given
when
practice
that ofparticularly
will state
remain
we
expansion
rely of are
upon or
and
driving AFD60, Flexible Pavement DeEnvironment
safety
and
Passengers:
to
hazard
project mode
millennium,
groups
performance
relationship
USDOT
environmental
particularly
needs,
control
standardized
to improve risks
will
and
just
what
overand/or
materials. to
gather
theahow
the
to
issued all
scheduled
ofsystemwide
vulnerable
the pedestrians,
alternative
final
There
critical
PPPs
pedestrian
psychology, abase
freight
methodology/framework
qualitythese set in commercial
destination.
to
and are
factors
relation
of
issues
factors transportation
and some
crashes,
national
social
vibration for
availability regional
that
are
are to This service
initial
predictive
more
learning,
relative offor
transportation
information
Ultra-thin
regional
environmental
sustainable
coming
Organization.
of
this
children Interstate
system. to HMA
context. or
grips or is
highway
The and
dooverlays
problems.
its
with not development
Research
life
carrier require
spurs span
measurement areTravel the
defined
objectives
limited?
regulations
through scenarios
behavior of as
urban
are
Brief
transit
modes
with
imported
efforts
modeling,
economic
7.
increase The
traditional more isto
background
customers.
to
energy the
the and
than
freight
create
perspective
synthesize
DOT riskand from
prevailinganofof
250,000
may
service school
issue change
electronic
this
environmental
collisions will and
assumption
annual
data
performancehave has, its
ownership
manifest
with
between to inimpacts
be turn,
that ADD50, Environmental Justice Economic
roadways,
strategies
and
damage.
to
weighted
must
varies
These
resilient
organized
areas
The
often
the
quantifying
data
on
information
having
importance:
public historical
needed
low-income afor
include
depending
orand
research the
contributed
signage,
tohealth
within
thicknessand
other
modulus reduce
Currently,
accordingto
collected.or
guidance
siting
would
�Other
have
planning
reporting
holistic
demonstrate
on
questions
ofof
to
and
congestion
much
transit-dependent
of a1shaper
the
asphalt
to
also
traffic and
new
the
shown
For
inch
the
major
of
performance
both
design
be
surrounding
objectives
areor
case the
example,the that
less
concrete,
transportation
airport
designed
conditions
federal,
that
economic
ofstudy
coming human
which
the itto
within
would to isto
the
state Development
all
system
existing
maintained.
of
them.
compare
Brief
built
includes
perception
information
urban
management
and
economic
households new
enplanements,
and use
sustainable suburban
more
data
Because
background
environment
qualityareas, theparticular
pricing is
ofon a
how thanor
Researchers
and specialty
costs of
major
frameworks.
consequences life developments
tocan
concepts.
vibration one
evaluate
the
of and
impacts,issue
definelimited
be mode
applications, must
markets
benefits?
of its
and
changed
and (U.S.
bythe
Often,of of
its
its will
applicability
be taken
behavior.
state,
transportation effectssuch
mindful
to
funds be
ofThebe as
on ADD50, Environmental Justice
Environment
possible
are
examples
built
light
contractor
modes
be
assess
Objective:
around
and to
highly
Coordination local be
environment
as the
of that
specificused
of Governing
developing
scrutinized
rail,
schools
government sate
as
effective
highway, the
approaches
betweentending at of both
and the
final
outreach
by
the air,
to
programs
transit art
wearing
ends
Network
AASHTO
most and
to
reduce modeoptions
of
likely
water.
elicit
and from the
model
2002
an
child
local trip.
served
Cargo:
transportation
the
to
of
alone
safer
Research
buildingsthe
problem(s),
going
both
investments Automated
archaeological
understanding
·Department
importance: or
How
for by
100
direct isfree
dotrucks
pedestrians.social
collectively,
During
needed
of
isolated
what
preservation/stewardship
towards in youparking.
prior
of per
Commercial
issues,
the
measure
Transportation,
environmental
acommon.
way to
effects
the
that
in and day
that Furthermore,
reaching
potential 1950s
Individual
specific
term in
develop
of
under
explores each
Environment
customer
freight
enhances and its
safety
project
and a
various
factors
Nationalthe final
1960s
really local
and
public files
choice
Development
surface.
prepared
It
becomes
pavement
modal
resisted
ongoing is likewise
pedestrian
Identify
housing model In
agencies
by for
more
dialogue
the
to addition
design
local
safety.
extent
education can
projects,
ease
affected share
agencies have
of
guide
residents.
with and touse
byof station
conflicts,
theisthe
inroadway by
magnitude economic
State
quality
advocating
enforcement.
economic
is To
critical selection,
further and
users DOT
when ofand toAlla ADD50, Environmental Justice
aas
how Sustainable
governments’
direction
destination.
(ACE)
framework
transportation
scenarios
problems
stakeholder
prior
can
Strategy
ability
or
performance
means
capacity also
state
understanding being
to to the
be
to
DOT
within on
where
and for
transfer the
With
adoptionzoning
developed
satisfaction?
analyzed,
Reduce
research
transportation are
the and principal
predictivethe
investment
solutions
niche
approaches
subsumed
context
steers codes
percentage
of
such
Congestion by
markets DHS
modeling
as
associated
important
departments.
system of
clear generally
connecting
into
an wellfor
serve
pedestrian
fromon
ofurban
the ofborder
as in
with the
these
black By
“cost
mode
disasters
benefit
planners
availability
shift
of
complicate
1. the to
Descriptionof aof
modal arrival
can
andultra-thin
of
different
the cause
agencies
of selection
practitioners.
transportation
process,
the displacements
measureoverlays
Need are and
decisions -
under sub-mode
there
facilities
the of
dynamic
DOT are and
with
ensure
adoption
development,
new
require
route,
imported
crossings.
evaluating
economic
critical
their
national
age,
America’s
disciplines
gathering
of
area, doing
investments.
box
(e.g.
transit
or
gender,
and
models.
rail
adequate
more
interaction of
100,000
goods
launchingAlso, alternative
service
effects.
adverse
protections
and
business,
the
versus and
Transportation
to thethere
than the in
reviewing
dichotomy
bus)
input
tons
consumed
pad is
”five are
urban
physical for
understanding
sincebeing
evolving
and for
selection.
and
fuels
parking
percumulative
fuels
areas,
communities appropriate
methodologies
year
ability,
Network
this
that
most will
established
locally
Vehicle spaces
and impact:
arriving
few
information,
exists
But so
of varying
that
(May
the
this per
such or AT025, Urban Freight TranspoEnvironment
or Economy
persons
·many
services,
the Questions:
modulus.
concerning
Commercial exception
responsiveness
Many
and
existing
1,000
departing or
instances
injuries which
Thecommunities.
Agricultural/food
available
square service
by transport
and where
connect
emergence
transportation
of to
information
feet
highway is USCG,specific
fatalities
modified.
of the
is
commercial
mode. trip
which Itof
crucial is
use
stakeholder
production
aboutcould anticipated
ends.
asset
investments
These of
has to very
be
effectThe
the thin
ofare ADA40, Transportation NeedsSustainable
ajurisdictions
2006) good
Infrastructure
impacts
Problem
vehicles
as
factors
the
between
Part
type
that the
education wider
transportation
2with
of –to deal
Civil from
to
that
Support
modelglobal by
Statement:
enter have
Rights
programs
influence
community
national US
Integration
transportation
the
agencies
cannot the port
developed
Act,
and
climate canmass of
Section
travel
of
state
application dobe
statistically
changeentry,
(VII)
market. specific
targeted
notand
transportation
needs 4(f), it
program
projects is
location
of
the be NEPA
and
the to and Equity
overlays
extent
·Growth
management
transferred
increasingly
modern
needs.
avoided
patterns
public
changes
development.
difficult How Theis
urban
if
and
spending
tomay desirable.
which
prevalent
to
traffic
trackresearch
product
create proposed
technology
being DHS.
economy
on
Although made
operations
where is Often
would
specific
new the
Environmental
movements
these at will
based usegeometric
changes
the
identify
near
groups.
pedestrian
these of
require
local
on
imports in
schools and
While land
aare
level.
being
assist
engineering,
and
specific
officials, the
independently
issues
methodologies
calibrated
number considered
inversusdecisions
in
Uniform
groups,visitation
cultural
of if education,
http://isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/OST/01298
choice. Ecological thethe
displaced as
track byas
Act,
resource
and/orlocal
travel FHWA’s
to
needed.
models to
the many appropriate
national
(i.e.,and
cost
conduct
survey
persons used ITS
enforcement
communities
This
specialists
urban)of
data
may in program
parks,
research
direct
an public
needs and
analysis
does
be
concerns,
use
Governing
future
·health mix,
Protection
The
decreasing
assess
were
different
“desire”
requirements
An
going airport – shift
devolution
madethe
Investment bridge
density,
by from
Agency
stocks,
various
safer,
industries
lines not
directly Network
of
between
canmeeting clearances,
and
traditional
intobut
inmechanisms
be may improvements
responsibility
(EPA)
fragmented in
little federal,
and
equipment/facilities
justified
the a use
activity
US research
primary curb
knowledge
Department
different
on
interior; of
shipments
used
locations
the and
state in
has
criterion to
basis
could
mitigation
wildlife
8.
strategies
were A collect
project
8.pdf;
historic
mitigation
and
in
not each eventually
summary
issues.
unprecedented. refuges,
severely
should
explain measures.
to
preservation
state or
the target
to of
factors
design provide
forests,
the
disrupted
also
develop
station
It alsothis conclusions
provide that
advocates
specifications the
conservation
issue.
bythat shape
state-specific
agenerate
had person been technological
construction
general will about
chooses, have
that data a
gutter
connectivity
and
based
of
to
types
and
that
could local
transportation
Labor
solicit
examined
ship/move
locally new of
they
besituations
frequent
input
or government
engineering
(DOL)
protect between
pedestrian
and
segmentation
transit
designated
inland mandate
projects
rules
deliveries,
develop
alternative
stops, solutions
overlap
surrounding
after as complementary
currently?
crashes involves
(home
an
storage express
responsive
fuels
NHS toat
with only What
economics
many
and
aand
ownership
more
facility those
nearbythin
near ifareit
infrastructure
Objectives
This
areas,
the
of
much the
provide
on
how the can
characteristics
guidelines
household-
Illustrating
suggested themore include
historic
interstate for
person and
this
that needed
when
thorough
environmental
economic any
monuments
highway of
person-level
impacts
problem
theaccess anew
low-income for
these
mid-block
basisbenefit.
the is a
system.
ofthe widespread
technologies
and
successful
for choices
station, other
discerning
fact
persons Starting
crosswalk
that
and
·overlays
uses
the
based
more
urgent
strategies
schools
for
met
that
public
markets
Research
in
is the
(live,
projected
housing,
pedestrian
neighborhoods
acan
distribution
electronic
appropriate,
These
affecting
legitimate
Performance
Study
are
decisions
transportation
partners
secondary
land
1990s
work,
deliveries
in
Multimodal to
detail.
trips
enhance
should
options,
Objective shows
human
from
possible.
address
college
center;
manifest
areas, in
portions be
play)
estimates
supported
in
from
given the
and
Morein
freight
an
criterion
that
however, the
combined
health.
spurious
measurement
aarea
the
attendance Aresearch
increase
fast
"spillover"
locally
system.
prepared to
aaapproximately
process,
few
efficiency
of variety
research
costs,
the
its
with
areas,
system
to growing
regarding
right
Also,
with
on
system
Decision-choice
also
concerns. face
systems
transit
deployment
which
ofbenefits,
use parking,
off
of
h
study
isroadway
for the
DHS/TSA home
needed
the
the 10-
have
This
that
and is
transportation
most
what
would
required
nonmotorized
now
engineeringis
particularly
include
delivery
perceptions
to analyses
transit
understand be
state
not toaffected
market. provide of
sub-modeinvestment.
travel,
governments/DOTS
technology.
only
when
and the the
agencies
In materials
issues relation
European
factors the
disproportionately.
a concise
reduce of The thatperson
are
involved
both between
guide
auto
practical
have and
stored
cities, used.
into
it in and
has
such
efficiency
education
transit
they
volumes
dock;
is
1. currently
existing
Tostudy
increasing
20% may
or service,
determinehighwayor
lead
(passenger
from use auto
assessing to
one or
of the availability
increase
excessive
coast
system.
private or the
levels, freight)
to the
investment
another.
potential
Examples
depth,
automobiles fornumber
or other
forOften
distance
include toainof
reached
and
discussion
fully
The
Part 3of
land
considerable
models
transportation
While
Some
designing
dependence,
the
bottom years –collisions
incorporate
the the
useduse
Develop
evidence
line; has
level
and
ahead? end
objective
tofactors.
in
political
of
of involving
of
environmental
been their
environmental
candidate
investment
constructing
improve
enable effort
these is and
hampered
to
air
the for
impactspedestrians
design
public
perform messages
anddata
these
quality,
realization life.
psychology
by
economic the
collection
have
reduce State
aoverlays
criticalfor
in
traditionally
· waste
been
proponents
crashes,
parking. calculated
transportation)
transit
considerations
this
national
and freight
intelligent Modal
effects transport.
including
vehicles
It
truckisis
highway
of dealt
and shifts
estimated
drayed that
operating
identified
tracking
vibration with
opponents each
environmental
generally and to
systems, transportation
traffic
that
afrom
center. all
on
in job
nearby of
in
the generates
pricing.
pattern
government
surface
urban issues,
legislation.
There
congestion
the isofaIn
Problem: In response to increased global AW030, Marine EnvironmentEnvironment Economy
trade,
II. RESEARCH freight imports PROBLEM at STATEMENT
marine ports ABE40, Critical TransportatioSociety
around
There is the
general United States
consensus (US) that continue
major to
Problem:
grow at record Environmental levels. The work
US isnational windows
the AW030, Marine EnvironmentEnvironment
investments
(“windows”) in security
areimport one ofmarket; of
the the management
Problem:
world's
critical largest Exotic
infrastructure Species had areto and spread
be madein 2006, world and AW030, Marine EnvironmentEnvironment
tools
wide
imports promoted
through to the US byrose
ballast the water.state
by 5.5 The federal
IMO had
RESEARCH
have
fish and to be wildlife PROBLEM
continually agencies STATEMENT:
made to if nationalto a ABE40, Critical TransportatioSustainability
percent
protect Environment
proposed
high
Catastrophic
security of 1.8is to standards
trillion
emergencies
achieveand for
dollars. the
aSTATEMENT
level While treatment
– whether
of protection two ofof
RESEARCH
endangered
ballast
the US’s water.
top PROBLEM
species
threeThese import standards which
partners, enable
when ABE40, Critical TransportatioEconomy
terrorist
and
necessary security attacks that
dredging or is natural
to
and be disasters
acceptable
marine –as
RESEARCH
adopted
Canada
transcend
“safe,” and
ratherwill PROBLEMrequire
Mexico,
geographic than haveSTATEMENT
monitoring
borders land bridge
and and AHB40, Highway Capacity and Environment
Critical
construction
The
enforcement
connections need Infrastructures
for for
tofunding
if the the“safer” purpose
desired
US, for are
China new
(than,
theoutcomeof physical
highways
and
for
marine other is to
RESEARCH
organizational
example,
and cyber-based atPROBLEM
theboundaries.
time
systems ofSTATEMENT
the that Both
World Trade AHB40, Highway Capacity and Economy
transportation
and
be
Asian
Freight
September
Center
RESEARCH
capacity
effective.
markets
traffic
catastrophe.) 11thThe
PROBLEM
and
improvement
are
growth states
and
trade.
becoming has ofissue
Hurricane
The
STATEMENT
The
California
contributed a serve
projects windows
larger
of Katrina critical
the
far
and to AHB40, Highway Capacity andEconomy
necessary
are
exceeds specified the functionsperiods to of all spectrums
the year when of
Michigan
portion
the
exposed
transportation
Freight
needs
marine growth of
of have
US inavailable
aindividuals,
traffic myriad
construction
Environmental
imports
vehicle
growth of issues,
infrastructure resources.
which
miles
has
government
activities
in
traffic Permitting
especially
contributed turn
protection
(e.g.
The
asistruck the
to
RESEARCH
practical
processes
increasing reality
inPROBLEM isneeds,
anintegrate
activity effort that
at at STATEMENT
towe
marine can
control nothe
ports. longer US AHB40, Highway Capacity and Equity
traffic
need
(CTIP),
the
agencies,
dredging
Throughout
build
ballast
to
growth
our
has
itsbetter
water andincreased
scope,
and
way inthe vehicle
private
dredged
out U.S.
discharges. of milesacosts
sectors.
there material
congestion.
rate
the
is
However a
faster
shared
traffic and
Protection
disposal,
desire asThe than
truck
types to
mainly
DESCRIPTION
person
responsibilities
financing
traffic hasimports
travel. has
increased OF
been equipment
Trucks NEED
of government, also
incompletely
atto amanage
ratehavegoods, faster afrom
military, than AP010, Transit Management Society Economy
of
pile
evaluate
Increasing
of
manufactured critical
driving
ballast the infrastructures
the
water for wharf
quality
ability
treatment
products, of against
construction)
transportation
equipment
hydrocarbons and are will
Municipalities
disproportionate
the
addressed, private sector, and
particularly transit
impact
and the
from on agenciesroadway
public. often
Further,
There
person
man-made
permissible.
service
operate
change
and
have
capacity
these
istravel.
chemicals.
to of
as
a long
the
justify its and State
system,
technology
particularly
catastrophes
and
This
roadways natural
their andsuccessful
disproportionate
reducing
onand
transit
raised
disasters
federal
from
networks science athe
projects
expectations
history
fish therefore
multimodal
demand and
on the
of AP010, Transit Management Sustainability
to AP010, Transit Management Economy
Sustainable
standpoint
TRB
growth
is
wildlife
The
perspective. and
essential
standard in other
agencies of
truck
to establishing
research
the
vehicle
The volume overall
under on
can
their
inregulatory
Transportation an
national
bus local agreed
performance
be attributed
respective
transit security.
Equity
through
improve.
basis
dominated
be
public better of better
policy. Additionally
increasinglyby
prepared coordination
arterials
Indeed, andcomplex
thereand
not ofgoals.
repeat
is no land agencies
streets. use
past Some
measures
to
This
endangered
operations
Act
and afornumber
research the
transportation, foris
21st of management
is factors
species
the designed
heavy
Century laws
and including
duty,to
have
(TEA-21)
providing anddevelop operations
the
determined
40-foot calls
choicesshift
bus.for
may
Transit
agencies
Depending
mistakes.
consensus
planning adopt With
agencies
are
of newer
ononincreased
public the
who more
conduct
implementing context,
should
transit. stringent
global atraining
betransfer trade
alternative
arail
Transit large
involved comes
truck in AP010, Transit Management Sustainable Environment
of
that
An
the
to
standards many
infrastructure adverse
entire
mainstreaming
travelers freight
operational,
for
requiring items
protection
impactsusing of from
to fishery
bureaucratic
transit,
alternate
replacement and
and
pedestrian
modes other
and are
increased
analysis,
fuels
can
policy-making
Description
operators
modes to
consume tohelp concern
either
have
truck their
of andthetheapplied
and from
electronically
cities
equivalent
planning,
Need. the communities
meet
this Land
changes ofwith
letclean
research use several
alone
inmay new
and air
the and AT025, Urban Freight TranspoEnvironment Economic
standards
wildlife
grant
and
major
equipment.
surrounding bicycle species
structure
themes and projects their
in
Carriers
port do
has TEA-21.not associated
been
complexesintoand likely built
the
shippers occur training
around
planning,
regarding or are
thisbe
fare
mandates.
cars
Within
agreement
zoning
now
economy collection
worth decisions
routinely andofOthers
transportation,
on technologies,
roadway
who
measure
businesscan areshouldhave instituting
capacity
thea an
broad
practices ability
be or made
impact manually
due
range new
suchto to on of
as the
pay Development
and
below
Young
bus,
design
mandated
ambient exerciseaand minimum
people
to routesthe airto point implementation
operation
use
quality are that threshold
increasingly
this and the
of the
technology, 40-foot
potential strategies.
during
U.S.’s not bus
butis
health these
biking ABE70, Women's Issues in TrSociety
by
transit
physical
prepare
for
the
performance,
just-in-time collecting
security
efficiency size,
for and transfer
to
the
innovations.
and
from
deliveries satisfy
acceleration,
respond movement
service slips
of to
A and
environmental
inventory sorting
turning
catastrophic
roadmap of
effectiveness urban items
The
seasonal
or
defines
transportation
Many
there
Research standards
walking State
is the periods.
frequentlyto
Problem need
activities.
standard system.
governments The to
aadded for
lag
Statement: be
question
Zoning
all
Largelydeveloped
have
between buses. practices
in
enacted
Public the It by
is the
effects
them
justice
radius
emergencies
required.
goods
(e.g.,
that
synthesizing
recommended
500,000-mile,
response
legislation
into
load
increase
have
from
concerns.
and
within To other
separated
to that
both
afactor),
From/To
holds
date
an
delivery
best
TEA-21, for
12-year
guides
localized
Yet
performance
financial
urban efficiency
practices
study
matrix.
uses
others
NCHRP area
frequencies.
vehicleismake
development
and This
are
significance
shortfalls
ofby (e.g.,
whether
Project
regional
being
ituse
against cost
difficultAt
3-70
in per ADA40, Transportation NeedsSustainable
told
the Equity
technological
transportation
increased
information
that
characteristics.
because
RESEARCH they of air
are is
the
NEED: improvement
patrons
pollution.
helpful
“key”role to
ofthe
The in typically
Almost
solvingplanning
system
general and all
their the
plays
consensus port
transfer transit
towns’
inand
between
determining
hour
same
infrastructure
environmental
to
which
(Multimodal
harmony
legislative
to walk
save
ortime or
alltime, the
mile), an
bike
other
with
action
costs
the
Level
save to location
operational
increasing
protection,
windows
transit activities
of
transportation
requiring
money,
identified
vehicles
Service of
are orthe–the
performance
proportion
while athe needs
origins
therefore,
for
and are the
supportable
Urban
tripother of the ABJ95, Visualization in Trans Equity Environment
emissions
centers,
congestion
delivering
is
available
and
(e.g.,
highway that there
destinations
speed come
interlines
revenues
system problems.
neededoris not from
of
schedule
is and
resources
adequate
demonstrate
goods.
undergoing diesel-fueled
timed
The adherence),These transfers.
difficulty
to render
'guidance' gross source
origins with
to aid
for
implementation
Past
management
young
measured.
Streets)
infrastructure.
improvements.
quality
categories studiespeople
andhas evaluating
However,
been tool
must
convenience
including Thisstrategies
There that
funded rely
type
oceanonce
isthe
achieves
on ofandneed
further
is role
being
agoing
better transit ofto
the
isexample,
development nearing
delay ICT
driven
than
vessels, goalson
as to ADB20, Telecommunications Environment
Models
this
This
use
impediments
and
effectiveness
rehabilitation broad of
disproportionate
limit
by travel
set
further
transportation
destinations, toof
(e.g.,
without behavior
goals
damage.
implementation
as farewell growth
systemboxthat
as
increasing typically
For no
in
planning
restrictions
return one
truckof take
or
capacity. vital cost on in
address
travel
of
their
operator
completion.
favors
Access
companies
there
on-road enabling both
behavior
activities. has
pedestrian,
management
private drayage marine
wait atraining
have
In
fleet
Whereas until
automobile. low-income
of
bicycle
trucks, on assessment
largely
construction
the 40-foot
that and
roadways
final
cargo limited
project
These buses,
transit
due
handling and
projects,
households has the
date
factors for AHB70, Access ManagementEnvironment
one-half
transit
volume
an
personnel
security
time
per
During influenza
and
passenger). canthe
solution in
measures.
routes
construction, beheadway
pandemic
the works.
attributed
application
followed,
Transit Creative
work of A
or the
solution
to
a
operatorsall
zones a
ofconnecting
number
biological
financing
impact use
can for thebasic
have of
delivery
focus
such
the
these
concentrated as
ratio to
must mechanisms
socio-economic
dredging
of because
operational
be on used, and
integrating and
dredged
whether and performance
vehicles demographic
modal material
empty totransfer, levelorbe
modes.
been
installation
have
equipment,
route
mobility
factors
RESEARCH
attack,
visualization
mechanisms
efficiency
these
less
measures.
studies. than as
andthe This
demonstrated
traditionally
the
may
including
New PROBLEMtype
harbor
average
not
transportation
and
similar
ideal methods
and cost ofof
help
the
multiple
conditions
research measures
todevelopment
there
determined
craft wait have
with
dispersion
STATEMENT
and
urbanis
(tugs),
time
system
sources
from
needed
significant
istechniques
no
congestion
goods
to anto
set incentive
and
ofdifficult
the must
to
can
are atof ANF10, Pedestrians Environment
disposal,
licensed
full,
service
used
benefits
to
individuals’
railroad
and during
incur to
then in
theto
drivers
analyses
promote be
peak
terms
locomotives.
apply financialcompleted
isor
at
willingness-to-pay
a oflow. off-peak.
the
mixed-use,reducing
value-of-timecosts
While It may
facility while
earlier.
the be
This
level
the and leads
costs
Federal
weight and
This
a of
to to
all,
population
An
deliver
required
movements
performance
passenger
Research
examine while
increasing needed
thea
under
to solution
carand
address
Problem and number
targets
role employment,
pharmaceuticals
SAFTEA-LU.
the
perspectiveof developed
that
costs
Statement:and
network of communities
problem.
to
evaluate
in 3D/4D the for
consumers
termsThe
attributes and air
shift
In ofthe of
are
in AHB20, Freeway Operations Environment
simultaneously
for
aincorporating
delay
transit
Clean
calculate young
wide
interconnection,
traffic may
Airvariety
crash
service people
Actbe
awhile
transfer of
those
injuries, protecting
extensive
providers
(CAA) from
undesirable
and techniques
and dense
traffic
penalty. low
andfee
its endangered
income
land
crash
inhibit
structure
subsequent
Transfers into uses
property that
for
are
quality
many
working
medical
visualization
addition,
and
progress,
narrower
purpose
Background
affecting producers.benefits
freight to
supplies
of in provide
lanes,
travel peer
this items
tools may
thereto
Often,
but usedfrom
more
comparisons,
project
behavior. thenot
hospitals,
have in
land
is alleviate
rail
comfortable
impact
tothe
Thebeen and
use medical
research and
on other
engineering
several
and
hypothesis servicein
trucks and
fishery
households
consequences,
HCM,
I. and
itfor
RESEARCH did wildlife.
to
not access
including
concentrate
PROBLEM activities the on
STATEMENT which
operation are of
are
damage,
adoption
service.
amendments
considered
issues
modes
convenient
centers,
development
actions
zoning
benchmarking
and
methods
is
part
buses
multimodal that
pedestrian
their
of anto
takenand
and
decisions
growing
that
of
the
truckinthe
influence
and
area
exceed do
by and
travel
service
elderly
pedestrian to
develop
not
interactions
best
regulate
and
dispensaryup not
the
are transit
delays.
identify
onthe
extensive
and
weight
solution
these
planning,
and
directly
U.S.
made smaller
friendly
Most
persons
changes
networks.
points
government
recommended
generally
at without
opportunities
standards
the
toat
sources,
meet
in
butain
vehicles
safety in
with
They
the there
the
the on reato AHB70, Access ManagementEconomy
the
right
There
urban
research
problem.
CAA
are
disabilities.
RESEARCH few is
form
isgreater
oftena
tools renewed
studies andnot
The
PROBLEM to design.
have
enough
use
best interest
forfor shown
way
STATEMENT to
analyzing
to nationally
controloverall
approach their incrash and
this
economy
seek
time
needs
transportation
consideration
improve
through
practices
The
transportation
participating
persistent
intersection
internationally
rate
The
localized
and of
Executive
The
reductions
Carriers
Alternative air
and
in
planners the
performance.
the on issue
basis,work
inbe
level,
quality
business
pedestrian
to
increasing
Orderright
security
the
resources
infrom
shouldwith
society. zone
reduced
where
vehicular
Transportation
efficient
on practices
amounts.
To
managing
issues be is
orsafety
collaboration
(involving
support
undetermined.
“hardening”
Critical
may
environmental
flexibility
the flow
emissions,
rewarded
because
and Insuch
prepare
greatest
inaccess
federal
of
these
Parks to
for
the
as
the the AR055, Rail Transit InfrastrucEnvironment
its
to
effect
problem
just-in-time
security
addition,
user
government
commodities
established
RESEARCH needsonIn to ridership
may
urban deliveries
improve
information
and to
areas between,
requirements
reorganization,
within
applications,
PROBLEM recall
access
the where
isof that
inventory
needed
STATEMENTurban to
transit say,
light“you
activity
attempts to
systemsrail get
items
help at
security
Infrastructure
residents
windows
adapt
amount
particularly
Developers
be
moving
and
emission
crosstown
what
transit
that
locations on
decision-makers
identification
outreach
environment.
collect Publicthe
you
increase
ofsources
schedules
of
beyond
(LRT)
and
to
for
and
to
Transportation
interaction
orderas
of
Lands
routes.
measure.”
Protection
telecommute
dredging
tracks
state
have delivery
public
process.
and
itcompliance
relates
projects
of 40
program
are are
effectively
governments,
access
and
routes
toamong
eitherofto 60
located
frequencies.
transit, to
Management
issued
more
dredged
the
various
25
for
when
authorized
exemptthe
percent.
mitigate
manage next
years
bysizes
varying
formation
local
modes the
offrom
to
the& inare AR055, Rail Transit InfrastrucEnvironment
The
Depending
Systems
White
frequently
material
To
demand
Problem rail
examine transit
House (TMS’s).
over on
than
disposal
Statement access(on
theagencies
the an The
is context,
Oct.toarea
that
service research
16, of
with
essentialit is
day, North
2001)a large
rich will
difficult
and activitiesAmerica
stated truck
cover
so toon.
occurs.
of
increasingly
Reductions
installing,
SAFETEA-LU
federal
existing
growing
Research
current
do
can
how
that
greenhouse
transportation
regional not
transportation
complete
by consume
the
regulation
freight
and
have traffic
infrastructure
young
of
authorities seeking
maintaining,
Objective.
“hardening”
needed
people historic
gases.
personal
aprovidesrailroad
congestion,
system
unified
the resources.
from
(i.e. and
equivalentAfor
data
protection
dredging
To
multimodal
for
system
low
date,
injury
and
foreign
in the
tracks
order
the
research
from
both and there
crashes
operating
development
flagged
because
private
of
of
within
income to
all
options
reduce limit
synthesis
track
several
logical
could transit
has
sector
“help
a quality
very
are
and the ADD50, Environmental Justice
of
the Equity
There
been
to
somewhat
equipment.
of
vessels)
High
Problem
The
limited
community
spread reduce no are
transportation
frequency
way
HCM, and/or many
research
orlower
Statement
to
right-of-way
of the eliminate
Shippers
develop
costs
disease definitions
are
grids
world’s specific
but
alternatives
of
while diesel still
are
solutions their
should
availability,
private leading theto
ensuring of
significant.
equipment the
auto be
mostthe
anticipated
to
that
source air
freight term
rewarded
private
travel.
the address with
for ADD50, Environmental Justice
Equity Economic
OBJECTIVE:
with
project
operators
safety
cars
physical
to
households.
It vested
worth
protect
“short”window-
would
“equity.†isof
criteria. needed
security
be the To
interests
through
of valuable develop
The
roadway
people,can
time
The to the to
way in
identify
Federal
be user
all
uniform
capacity modes
addressed
economy,
frame discover
equity guidance
both
Railroad
(in system
due
S. of
positive
essential
F.
iswhether
defined to
Bay, forof
the a
The
impacts
Literature
for
motor
low
customer
Transportation
the
tracks
highway
Walking
movement current
using
turnover
multiplicity
are on
vehicle on
carriers
often
capacity
is also
ofsignalized
implementing
the
attractive the
rates.
 transportation
decision
of traffic
that
transportation
located
being
goods, issues
and network intersections
are
Additionally,
level access
operations
compliant
makers
encouraged
supplies, faced
less of fornetwork
design,
than in
service
and and to
the transit
25
to and
and
larger
but
feet in Development
transportation
transportation)
and
Problem negative Statement system
impactsthere are
of planning discontinuities
land use and
accounts
Administration’s
physical
throughout
human
the
more
influences
unsignalized
management
other
impacts
further
accommodate
US
they
stakeholders
for
from
window
Ports,
are
today’s
determinations,
improve
resources.
diverse
theareas. size,
and
of and
rewarded the the
access
especially
only complex
nearest
personal
records
the
government
have
(FRA)
life
isintersections
about
fleet
visitor
sustainable
acceleration,
distributive
treatments. –cycle
management
for
LRT the
touted
provides
and
4-5
able established
using Track
access
society
track.
of
services,
months).
Ports
public to
in
thegoals
those
fairly In
Safety
atransit
andTMS.
iscarry
chapters
Access of and
economic
to of
is
situations
constant
health,
by
and
the an
carriers
mobility
NY/NJ, ofFTA
other
This the ADD50, Environmental Justice Equity
professionals
and
zoning
Standards
performance
project
national
Another
Problem:
maximum
action. gaps
the in
decisions
industry
will were
security
issue data
focus
load
Cost-benefit on in alternative
and
on
in
developed
characteristics.
ofon
encounteredthe the
the information
commodity
TMS peak
analysis, National
Unitedthat for
ininvisualization
The
40
for the flows
support
theStates.”
foot that
TransitHCM,
example, railroad
San will
and
and the ABJ20, Statewide TransportaEquity
HCM2000
management
somewhat
that
needs
Los
intensive
development
determine
where move
Angeles,atfreight essentially
more
beyond
congested
areas.
what Longtreatments
benefit
tracks limited,
The
the compliance.
Beach, only
national
timed-transfer
are of
performance address
separate
but
and
improvements
located indicates
parks
Tacoma, Ideally
next the
speed
andisand
criteria are
to
passenger-car
provide
tools
allow
costs.
Transportation
Database.
industry.
the
traditional
Extensive
Francisco
larger
usually
level
differentials,
Current
that
there
public
increasingly
Objective
designed
our
are, ofand
world’s
Transportation
accessbuses
should
recreation,
discussion,
A second
employs
service
NCHRP
lands
transportation
and then
their
to
This
Althoughleading
traffic
research
Bay but
equivalence
remove
management
be
and/or
serving
offer to
recommended
but
region,
ofa
debate
investments
research
also
the
Project
an
not
the
and
also
source
management
has
agencies
positive
develop in
the providing
utilitarian
turning
attractive
infrastructure.
create
been
3-70
and
focuses
applicable
isautomobile
that can
factors
significant
for
have
reinforcement
environmentally
national
measures
economic
application.
decision-
producehighway
aroles
conducted
there the
concept
traffic
would
provide on by
more
market
connection It
by
is
mode. atoof
ability
from
is
for
an
ABJ20, Statewide TransportaEnvironment
LRT
roadway
benefits.
Yet,
making
objective
different aerial
the in isguideway,
type.
The
ever-increasing
the
benefits to For
communities
formulation
identify for AREMA
example, the complexity,
different of
most thatguidelines
the
public have
efficient
members policy
statute,
capacity
functions
since
shortage
to
equity:
Automobiles,
through
provide collect
broadly-based
significantly
for
sensitive
creating
To
that
important
those
require
equivalence
then,
carriers
develop
is the
a challenges
these
and
of for
considerable
lanes,
building
areas
further
sustainable
criteria.
crash toaand standards
level
traffic
focusing
contractors
positiveservice
distribution
buses,
andshippers
where
local
cost/benefit
understand
Thus,
walls
factor
of
with
at
for
in
signal
on
benefits
if
applications
service the
and
data
private
conflict
all
are
throughout
of
pedestrians,
restrict
block for
that
less
congestion
control,
goods
left
template
piers
signalized
commonly
methodologies
equipment
about
facility
in
wantturns
motor
as
frequent
transportation of and/or
terms
local
the andis
of
freeway
how
the
level
to
to to
a
LRT of
air aof
day,
been
coupled
and
Research
arrangements
the
transit
used
determinations,
management,
and most
long-range
public.
as
best
limited withNeed:
performance
aare successful
Decision
template
practices growing
of
and
disposal transportation
Highway
land
provides bymakers at
budget
uses
measures.
sub-system
of many
protecting
site promoting
and for
fairly often
availability constraints,
transitsecurity
rail
the Although
constant projects
need
critical to to ADC10, Environmental Analysi Economic
transportation
including
services
bicycles
improve
multimodal
reduced thatoff-peak,
traffic all
LOS. facility
maximizes
potential
flow in and 30is performing.
betotalfoot
users
improve and
welfare
of less
urban
safety. As or
move
vehicle
quality
assess
service
environmental
problem,
structure
intersections
pedestrian
requires
planning.
inevitably
economic
know
there
agencies
passenger-car
components
infrastructures.
accommodate
The
technology
buses value
beyond
how
mayrisk
and
built atravel
travel
concernsbut
and and
support
. less
movement
ofthese
be is delay
compliance.
ambient
is
transportation
fundamentally
Considerable
affect broad
for
(e.g.,
travel
becomes
for the
inappropriate.
2.0.
With
long
must
prioritize
intensive
justice
benefits
the
equivalence field
timeAand
locations
property life of
support and
air
growing
minimum
all
approximately
more –
improved
these
The
weighed
potential
transit
equity,
quality
values.
commodities
may
devices,
savings
may
toin
options
new
information
factors
and be beEPA’s
protect
number
approach
concept
track
efforts
use.
is
control
(VTTS)
more
and
4mcy
more by
traffic
against
also and
inthe ato
of
of
is a ABE20, Transportation Development
EconoEquity
social
street
Access
level
Smartway
the
Geographic
Timed
balance
problem,
guideway
professionals
recognize
address ofutility.
need intersections.
management
service.
transfer
the to
what
from
that
catastrophes, The
Transportation
transport
Information
incidenceaisEvenalternative
commonly
performance
possible
question safe At
has
and goods
of urban
these been
System
impacts
impacts
especiallyusable with
limited
Program to street
shown
employed
criteria
values, support the
products
that
thosein isthe an
can toin
data
Increased
within
distributed,
when
safety
roadway
software,
place,
annual
critical
sophisticated,
cost-effective
highest
intersections existsan
transit
standards
there type.
maintenance
input
net regarding
accessibility
urban
system especially
is operators
to
benefit
the anFor area.
developed
software,
emergent
benefit-cost
transportation
than modes technology
example, will
This
on
dredgingand
aisareinforcement
fixed-size
the increase
synthesis
traditionally
advocates
in-house.
the
need
“winner.â€
also for
analysis,
agencies
fleet
interact and
factors
toall of there
would 40
be
A
research
example
There
While
the
for
smaller
decision
we
might
especially
pedestrian
that
is
number
focus
underserved
assert
However,
for an
communication
develop
highly
significant
U.S.
program
useare is
public
be
emerging
level onthatto of effective
exists
growing
economy.
transit
making.
global
of
US under
two-lane
training
amount
positive
determine
causedenvironment
customers
practice,
transit
because
on
transportation
development.
systems
in
social byOne in
the
evidence
For
congested
nature
consensus groups.
ismake
the good
highways
network,
standards
terms
of that
butrail
literature
impacts
example,
and
familiar
whether
derailed that
requires
suchthat
alsocan
for
links
ofsystems
in improving
of
conditions.
Compared
transit
forare as the
larger
axiom
our about
freight
CTIP
reach
should
the to 1.1,
security
exists
access
much but
industry
share
motoriswith
have
metro
will
and
itbe
one
to
 ABE20, Transportation EconoEquity
In
sponsors
understanding
have
foot
However,
each
both
that
management
does
fuel
been
of
areas
that
proposed every the
heavy
other
traffic
considers
not
tax, to the
implemented
four-lane during
ability
duty
this
include
three such
facilitatesafety
service on
primary tothis
traveler
vehicles.
approach
the that and
commercial
marine
containers
roadways in
crosstown
meets brief
potentialsource
variousdoes
improvements
traffic
are
both window.
behavior,
real-time
Some
that to
transportation.
of
andnot
flow. of
moderate
business
National and
enters/exits
directly
goals? address
suburban All
the
Crash in
tied
Are
train.
stop-and-go
more
pandemics.
Description
best
commercial
consider
prior
environment,
does
for
information
personal
dredging These
than
achieved
studies
not
freeways practices
share
or
projects crash
of traffic,
meeting
All
area
that
and
with
other Need
by
improves
common wallslarge
organizations,minimum
and
astakeholders,
and multi-tiered
elsewhere;
focus
multilane
individuals
require are
increase
on tractor
Research
mobility the
equipment massive
highways
permits national
includingtrailers
system
property
especially
having for
control from in
low-
or1.5. ofin ADC10, Environmental Analysi Environment
determining
performance
benefits
the
quality
rate
activity
The
transportation
Parks
the
Research
travel
to distributions
capital
United
economic
issuesand of
reductions
demand
andmight
patterns. service
Need cost
Federal the
land
States date asofbest
include
through
fundingof toavailable
highbenefits
one
development/land
However,
development.
complimentary? installing
Lands
goes use reduced
as
at the
through of
mode
changes50
the
travel Into
or
ballast
That the
may
percent
federal
service
many fuel
burdens
in
the
behavior
is, theuse
water
Los areon
and
type,
state
does
size,
have
standards.
transportation,
Objectives:
technologies,
values.
Europe
measurement
income
even
A
center have
growing a
track much
On
where a the
communities, significant
gage
number slower
High-quality
Currently need
devices,
other
there
of anddirect of start
areto
hand,
wheel visual
there
and
or up
pedestrian
approach
active
outputs is impact
time
nuisance
contributes
professionals profilesno
components. basic
initiatives
of than
this as on
tothe
responsibility
Description
multiple
transportation
customer.
(grater
specific
improve
well-documented
built
values,
treatment
state
fee
Angeles/Long
From
models
highway
addressing
the
passenger
environments
complexity
methodology
Reliable
effects
to a(TMC)).
surrounding
promote
transportation
livable,
railroads
question
use
environment.
level,
structure, but agencies
program
do cost
(noise,
healthy,
do,
Research
populations
or
these
of
lower
it
systems
may
not
departments
for
ofconsistently
congestion
cars.
with
urban
the to
data
Need
feecapital
smaller
Beach
are not the
the
in
development
usually
urban
Especially
congestion, places
apredict
full
and
improvements
orFRA
values, goods
isand
(including
This
will
be
collection protection
(San
economically
funds.
needed
vehicles),
because
quality
before be
railroad
Research
literature
sufficient
soil
financial Pedro
accommodate
itin is and
especially widely
environment,
where
integration and
indicates lengthy
relevant
How
of
considerable
systems
loss
pollution,
movement
to
itof
such
standards
of
reduced
does
service
after
Bayto
standpoint,
itself
or of
viable
to
is
under
critical
are
as
not
acover
and
Ports)
and
etc.)
for ABE50, Transportation Dem Economic
do AHB65, Operational Effects oEnvironment
infrastructures,
Objectives:
endangered
select
determine
exhaust
consider
another
research
summarized
Research
neutral
and
operation
type
port
incorporating
timed-transfer, a
carriers
oflane
complex. proper
emissions
federal costs
individual
mode.
where
Problem
economic and species
in
currentlyantheir
VTTSand
access
maintenance
land
This
Geographic
often peror
article and
Statement
impact or
researchdepartments
has
benefits
have
using essential
been
vehicle,
community
management
by
National in Reid
most
little
costs
topic
Information
half of the real-time
increased
Park
the Ewing
economic or
fish
subject
factors.
ofcontrol
will has
the
differ Development
accepted
address
are
the
pedestrians
strategy,
recommend
information,
may
planning,
more
communities,
not
congested
TMS’s
within expensive
equivalencies
decrease
address have
theirthe that
management,
and air
are
miles,
many
conditions.
the any
to
erosion quality
however,
property
in
transit build.roadway
of
anticipated,
Canada,
however,
potential
jurisdictions. issues trucks
and goals?
is operations,
struggles
In sediment
sorely
values.
wherethe
specific expansion
in
stop-and-go
to
The play Or
areas
encouraged
to lacking
Analysis
purpose urban
a are
to where
vital therein
is of
habitat
of
transfer
ridership
An
been
and
There
situations.
incentive
existing numerous
alternative consultations)
of
implemented.
Robert is with
increasing
to
highway In empirical
performance
Cervero improved
with
cases
install system the
In
in
recognition
where
them. andand data
addition,
the careful
perceived
highest modeling
to
Transportation
access
Grants, net
that the low benefit
(e.g.
address
System
headway.
project
unintended
loading
Research
and
people,
measures
order
such
land
measurement
demonstrate
individual
traffic,
role
for
Travel
coordination
studies,
customer. in
them
through
will to
impacts
use the
(GIS)
will
zones
and
largeact
and
managing
Demand to
This
howeverrailspur
Problem
congregate. park,
dichotomy
capabilities
leads
of aeconomic
consequences
are
technology
specifically
on destination
present.
implementation
istransit
transportation
credibly
tractor-trailers
better
and component
benefits
traffic
Management
to
Statement
understand
planning
almost These
for
what –nor
between
properties. intuitively
erroneous
during
all(orof
highway itof
have
among
the
development
such of
plans park,
raising
communities
integrating outcomes)
can and
how
(TDM) oncost
alocal
social are makes
tonot
such
actually
much
ofand
and AHB65, Operational Effects oEnvironment
comfort,
could
Compounding
improvements
Research
successful
management
interest
replacement
urban,
regional
sense
ridership
and
average
There
are concentrate
with
provide As
is
developing greater
loans,
rural,
air Record
vehicle
a an highway
emissions
increased
estimates
sizablejobs. the
in
produces
and and
etc.). mobility
1780
speeds
alternative
new benefits
problem
travel
bodytaxdesigns,
capacity
Also,
and
However, access
ordinances speed
(2001).
large
incentives
by
of the
controls
does
to for in
using and
enhancement
type
to
there
improving
literature the
one
notan
and
gains Itand
and transit-
have
of traffic
support
crash are inpublic
an no
the a
just
projects.
(a)
economic
well-linked.
realized
contribute
slower
Problem: systems,
system(s).. by
start Lackimpact but
different
to up of
That
these timeamission
methodology
deficiency
analysis social
and
than and
other as
groups
passenger information,
has
required
broad impairs to
is be by
cars.
following
protect
strategies
agencies
investigations
dependent,
population
integrated
flow
demonstrates
particularly
mean
history
of
emphasis
information
good
hard
transit
walls
There
examining
design Specifically,
have
congested
transportation data is
the
travel
of
corridor and
service,
mandated ato
guidelines
emergencies.
are infrastructures
and
segment
multimodal
also
promoting
on
to and
growing
the
most
project
have
research
been
the
successful
speed,
segments reduced
system
expanding
or
demonstrate
or by
safetythe
network
of
often
need
torail and
responsiveness
the early
development The
sponsors,
produced is
approach
documented.
designs needed
wear
burdens
economic
implementing
AREMA, effects of
implemented
the
to
surface
under
implemented
adoption
the
service
under goods
this
quantify
of and
foriswhat
average
current
angle to normal
essential
to
in
ofIt
impact
research of
design. tear
urban is
travel
of
vary
the and not on AHB60, Highway/Rail Grade CEnvironment
to
within
the
addressed.
NEPA.
complex.
societal
In
Especially
Flangeway
transportation
and
mitigate
or
values
determine
the ability
order afor
Without
emergency
permits
street “mega-community”
goals.
trafficof
Priorprovide
relevant
gaps
are
the
the
network DOT's
Concomitantly,
aconditions.
studies
Federal
not
entireat clear
network,
congestion
effectiveness toencourage
operational
are
issued
fromurban meet
synthesis
often
legislation
the
crossings
whether
and
over orwiththe
The of
measure
equivalencies
population
of work
axle
mixed-use
common
the
and
are
real-time in
assistance
it
developed
contribute the
weightan
is or to AHB65, Operational Effects oEnvironment
another.
evaluate
Research
uncommon
demand
streets,
on
anti
network.
with business
pollution
regard Such
intersections
to
must Problem
Afterfor
changes
to an the
effectively
activity
technology outcome
adjusting
being Statement
peak
in
and is hour
density,
isserve
landand
for may
relatively mean lead
diversity,
all
should
inflation little to
travel
be
and
movement
spatial
situations
alternative
proposal
actual
parallel
development
purpose
requirements
generation
rigorous
benefits
Safe,
to
of
improved
uncompleted.
for
data
vehicles.
potential
research its
trucks
accessibility
directly
training large
analysis
affects
parking.
Accountable,
tomembers and
in
affected
standards
influenceairanetwork
roadway
fuels
suggests
of
evaluation,
as
subgroups
Some work of
concern tools
patterns
unity
reliable
functionin
quality.
environmental
conducted Theof
and
trucks
What the
zones.
by of
environmentalitmandatory
and
expansion
Flexible,
this
and
travel
the a for
research
of
on
the
technologies?
useon
and
effort.
cost
is
of
area,
disaster
Some not absence
outputs
of
our
outputs streets
data
difficult
wheelchair
materials
travelers.
decisions
increased
how justice
will
guard
urban
always
Stove-piped
Efficient
the or
communities,
question
actual
or
laws
andto to
from
American
not,
should
Thereof
costs
problems.
thatofareas
provide
rail such
predict
users,
is
aon
be
Multilane
speed
design,
transportation
development
considered
increases
voluntary
national
improve
FTA
economic
Problem: New of and road
urban
in
use.
policy.
decision
Starts regional
asfuel
development
The may cross
arterials
modes
possible
This
and
policy actually
efficiency
making. sections
research
Small
issues to
accessibility.
andpositive improve
provide
be
over
However,
Starts
opportunities.
that are
positive.
topic the
for
will often
The
an by
years,
will
LRTthe
need 10
the
to
evident
serve
solutions
as
financial
agency
also
individuals,
might
Thus,
travelers
designed
miles
literature
appropriate
There
the
Transportation
Public
and
always
delivered
however,
today
reinforcement
the
also
individual
and
freight
support
impacts
are
exists
motor
seek
BRT
is:
aisTransit
variety
Endangered
include
itguideway
per
is is
can
activities
thean
littlein
are
whether, tacks
the
information,
some
evaluate
to
hour
onfuel
GIS
projects
no
passenger
important
include
the
balance
of
ofexploring
impediment
means
the more
after
literature
identify tax
product
in
ability
various
Equityrather
Association
most by
under
research the
transportation
longer Species
quality
connection
actions are today
to
which
vehicles,
to
some
access
among
standardto
vicinity
there
on
be
types
Act: safely
than
to
effective
TDMthe onA
transportation
understand
of
considered
type
the
promote
Act
(APTA)
the
generally
development
examples
is of of
aand
“windows”
the
higher
service
management
between
those
and
outcomes
Legacy
response, manner;
strategies
impact
air of
the
modes.
Rail
value the
for
which
median, at
modes.
Ballast
quality can
LRT as AHB30, Vehicle-Highway AutEquity
of
land
of
Environment
The
One
to
aerial
efficiently
There
sufficient
Clean
requirement be
transportation
that
Users
Problem:
Transit
There
Architectural
recovery
therefore,
possible community
very
are addressed
is
Water
is a
the
(SAFETEA-LU)
Task current
move
need
or
The
atools
and growingeffective.
Act.
to
social
Force
training and impacts,
to
to as example
goods
analyze
facilities
potential
evacuation
to and
enhance the
confine
share
need requires
(RT-S-FS-008-01)
Transportation
and and
on
economicincluding
potential
mobility
tois
exercise of
thea
information
and property
quantifythis
derailed
people
determine
metropolitan
accomplished.
economic foris
changes
Barriersthe
inthe
V-HA
the the AHB30, Vehicle-Highway AutEconomic
regulation,
travel
service
maintenance
standards
intersections.
either
treatments
use
An
access
Water
provides
With
control
be
restructuring
effects
goal and
effective
complex
of time
the providers,
depressed,
management
Management.
of
meeting of there
reliability,
have
transportation and
equity
street
approximately
implementation
measures with
business Level
routes has
been
the and
garaging
can
raised,of
design
that
ambient onbeen
which
need
into
relocations, freight
may meet
service
the or
implemented.
suggest must
one-third
oftoprogress
be is
costs,
flush. aidentified
haulers.
for
environment,
the
access
trunk-and-feeder
air quality closely
that
are larger
of Wheninthe the
This a
systems
freight
areas
·values.
about
respective
resulting
areas
improvements,
developed,
actual
Compliance
The
implementation
vitality
regional where
the
to
controlthe is
train
effects
of from realized
context
tools
developroles to
“Standards
Board
center
aimproved
windows’ of
community a
expansion limited
used
of
service an
including
trucks
methodsneed
within
(ATBCB)
of
programs by
stakeholders
TMS’s of
for
onorto
lateral
which
leading
provision.
intermodal roadways
traffic
Inspection
highway
need goal
region contain movement
these
and
Perhaps
planning
flow
of
to
established and be is
having
the and Development
related
research
vehicle
RESEARCH
environmental
motorized
flush
While
traditional
accommodate
for
purchasing
Alternative
implemented
information
corridors
particularly
standards
and median
instance
linked the although
Awards isthat
maintenance especially
PROBLEM
vehicles
with
topower is
neighborhoods,
air distinct
justice
selected,
vehicles
quality,
and
Transportation
industry
across,force
important urban
ongoing it in
otherdid
and
new important
staff,
STATEMENT
traffic
buses.and consideration.
requirements
the it
noise,
in
wide. formsadditional
HCM2000
the
in
externally
researchtransfers
elements often
flow
with
users energy
Some of
1960s,
Parks andfor
to includes
implies
high of formal
and and
to, and
is
all
cities
to the
may AHB40, Highway Capacity and Environment
generally
findings
communities
The
beneficiaries
this
process
improvements,
Maintenance
facilities
asupport
staff
studied,
over prevent
nexus
RUSLE
is
continuous
and
the one are
that
that
or not is
reason
resources
including
past the
encouragean
applicable
between to
an
of
begins
of
are
path possibility
option.
develop
agriculturally
the
offered
several Fixed why
either
for public
investments
with
that
delivery a
yearsthe
by
Structure
arePlanners
(surroundings,
a
purely
wheelchairs
vibrant of
transportation
health
social
20-year
automated
to an
based
critical
mechanisms address – impact
in
long-haul
and benefits
Transit
with
to soil
CTIP. the a
influences
drivers
The
how
based
atypes:
improved
density, ability
to
two-way
efficiency,
recognition
notwithstanding
Public
organization.
be
For
evaluate
have
deployment
with
engineers
traffic perceived
both on and
Lands
bought
the mixed
passenger
the
in
LRT
volumes); on
to
needother
operationalize
control
left
fuel
and by
the travel
accurately
whole turn
economy
land delay,
greenhouse
environmental
federal
There
negatively.
Aviation
planning
support increases
decision
to be among
operating
lane
use,
vehicles,land
are
fleets them estimate
but
(TWLTL).
and
with
often
to
processes.
structure.
able of in
managers
However,
Environmental regions
widencosts.
in
that
reduced
trucks,
gas a ways
groups,
fuel
multiple
Compressed
more service
gridded
emissions. In
atax
Both new and
that
urban
willrates AV030, Environmental ImpactEnvironment
systems
preparedness
loss
Ultimately
Research
of
strategic
vehicle prediction
different that there
Objectives:
plan
guidance forms and
withtool will
on of modified
needs, needpedestrian
transportation
Existing
transportation
freeways to
goals, for
be
case
have aactivity.
an
and has agreed
studies not
Track”.
or
maximum
ensure
and
healthy
issues
The
states
street dual
saturation
facilitate
measure
areas,
emissions,
pedestrians,
governmental
over
need
options
Light
Design
roadway.
Natural
intended
effectively
·construction
been
distribution
assessment
use
the
a
Rail
theto
the This
purpose
the
level
discussed
of
network
for
Tool
Gas
gap
support
their
has
decades.
better
The
sufficiently Many
and
standard
efficient
average
flow
choice
it
United
lines
safetyGIS of
not
has
(AEDT)
buses,
quantify
of
of
sites. and
bicycles,
and in
rates
inclusion the
been
not
understanding
project
with
businesses
unintended
effects
costs
their
inch.
performance
development.
above.
studied
and
VTTS
iscategorize
often is an
transit-oriented
States
well
and
because
Thethe
acrossand
non-governmental need
Ongoing
development
is
been in has
fundamental
verified.
impacts
of or
Highway
excellent
effective
Is there
transit.
Environmental
selection
designed
the that
outcomes
back-in
the
cost-benefit
between
quantified.
ofto
Aviation
these
measures.
understood
multiple
serve
regulatory
Invisitors
with
have
of
what
virtue
Recent
version abeen
reliable,
of
feeder
emit
angle for
design
of
locating Itof is
of
and
Collaborate
investments
problems
recognized.
template
both
actions
response,
ways
safe,
being
effective
The
determining
analyses.
pedestrian statistics
commuters
and
Rhode todata
simple to
for with
recovery,
This that
are
be
However,
transit
promulgate
what
efficiently-operating
Island
and and so
exchanges
signalized
may the
resolved
and
bicycle extent
Public and
avoiding
mean Federal
frequently
systems the
long-haul
federalthrough
potential
evacuation
can
among
Transitcertain
intersection property
Aviation
and
disaggregating
research TDM overlooked.
marine is
freight.
regulations
states
Authority
in quite
that
pitfalls
Florida AV030, Environmental ImpactEnvironment
raised
well-known
features,
Facilities
This
agencies
willingness-to-pay
Protection
limited
services
Environmental
developed
very
deploying
OBJECTIVE
shipping
parking;
This
when
the
sectors low median
research
research
RUSLE it have
for
of
levels
comes
of next
(or
intensive that
(HUSLE)
society:each
is
shippers
Agency
organizational
have and
the
will motor
intended
attracted
Portfolio
not)of
toto agovernment
based
(USEPA)
the
Volatile
various
land
document TWLTL.
potential
transportation
who
catastrophic
is needed vehicles
resources to
use
on
substantially
Management
roadway
uses Organic
levels to In
provide
fare
and
the vessels
establishes
to some
reducetraveling
areofmode
pricing,
including
improve
fill
(federal, amore
V-HA
a bigthe
that the
Tool
value
Administration
transportation
mobility
comprehensive
With
for
may
strategies be impacts
more
accessibility improvements
required of
Objective of
the in
on transportation
(FAA),
investmentsscope,
national
during public
and the for Environmental
but and
arterial
system
rights-of-way
various
Approach it isprojects
strategies.
types also roads,
being of AV030, Environmental ImpactEnvironment
transportation
related
Research
under
reorganized
performance
analysis
has
instances
at
number
must
Fuel-based
service
National
·budgetary,
riders
(APMT),
dependent
Compounds
are
the involved
amode
near
comprehensive
proactively be
inputs
regulatory,
emergencies,
void
regional, in than
unclear.
the The
to
section
of
type,
the ameet
issocial
Ambient
conduct
state,
needed
constant
provided its
costs
revenue
time
the
on 1201
actual
designer
vehicle
address
federal
and
What
objective
to
safety the
financial,
way
these
system
equity,
routes
measures and
economic
and
one-seat
the
requiringno
DOT's
and Air
tools
effects
to
of objectives?
pedestrians
isspeed
trips
awith thewould and
shortfalls
land/
clear
of
and
local), Quality
personnel.
quantitative
traffic
particulate in
support
SAFETEA-LU.
in
benefits this
used
of
determine
the
suchof
taken
the
spreadis
amodes
which
National
express
andbuffer
healthy
late
as
prefer
35
evaluation
that to
and
are to
of
Standards
their
research
to
administrative
further transportation manage
planning
1990’s
capacity,
the
and
the 50
spaces
research,
What
athe
safely
Invasive
services
matter.erosion local
raised
miles
Parkisof
specific to
by
Protection
Proposed
On
congested
fairly the
physically
require
emergencies.
TDM
marine
for
delay,
level. a
bicyclists generalsome
strategies
recommendations
improvements and
funding
environment
particular
and in Agency
Research.
surface
or
queues. type
in
TMC’s
in
determining side,
nature
financially
resolution
provide
purpose of
(EPA),
mightThis
streets, facility
TEA-21
provide
environmental
The as asthe
a– and
research
Highway itparking
constrained
of result
otherwise
to
level is
this (various
a other
encourages
intended
greatest
better
of issue.
number
of review
Capacity
service will
the each
be
serve be
Rail asaa
of
median
per
separated.
the
Species
expected
unit
(NAAQS).
II.
they
assessment
location.
However,
effects
develop
traffic.
between
tools
analysis,
control hour
vehicle-miles
value
authorities type
RESEARCH
replaced.
used of in tend
would
and of
to
andorder
V-HA
through
and by
recommendationsof
Traditionally,
with of to
Additionally,
roadway
increase
Maximumprovidebe to
growing
will produce
travel.
communities
guidance
(public, very
characteristic,
PROBLEM
The enhance
current
uncertainty.Thisplay
traffic
private access
in space
helpful
pollutantthe
STATEMENT
business
reliable
toconcerns
out
lanes tools
address
for to
and atmobility
considerably
future,
etc.
datainmust
management
the
and
create
highway moving
appear
impacts
public-about
gaps as
core be
parking and
we ofto AV020, Aviation System Plan Environment
cross-sections,
stakeholders
undertaken
level
facilities,
afunctions
year,
lines
The model
economic
windows’
dominated
and
Manaual
thresholds playing
solutions
that
objective
compliance
Objectives:
growing and
for carry
and in
all to
ground
development
programs?
proportion
(HCM)atby for greenways)
create
three
rail
for
perform
of trucks
fright
the
benefits transit
processes
method
intersections. ofphases.
where
effectively need
project
Hasandand
tasks
benefits?
gained
its of an toand/or
implement
systems.
a
ridership. The
planning
transit
3moving
that
is
predicting
Initial inch
to
enhanced
by
better first
are
develop buses,
The
Can Along a
safety,
less
provided
from
the
move
are
global
the
regarding
lanes;
vibrant
and
private),
I. pollutant
an
adoption
concentrations
The
Challenges
overstate
assessment
handledto
country’s but
development
climate
shortfalls
construction. for
economic abutting
increased
the to will
effective
pedestrian
Research emissions
roadside
of
state
under
transportation future
and
It ballast
generally
problemsprovide
change,
would
Problem of theproperty
viewpoint.
utilization
DOT
use advanced
social
networks.
to of
areas
some
promoteof
serve than
hardware
treatment
shall
managers
transfers,
guidance
and
guard
businesses
Statement and
those
The
wherenot
cities
as Case and
navigation
economic
best
therail(s)business
analysis
toexceed
arefour
studies
basis
and in
surrounding
standardized
phase
agencies
are
APTA
freight
minimum
required
training
TDM
achieve
several not
efficiency
extremely
saturation
Proposed
conclusions
owners
involved
RESEARCH
underground
should
processes
efficiency
willyet
document
traffic
strategies have
for
timely
of
express
in
consider
be
RIPTA’s
flow land
flangeway
standards
of
high
Research:
are
"stop guideline
thea
are
OBJECTIVES
forward.
(as andthe
understood.
emergency is use
literature
contribute
marine
development
rates
that flexibility
intended
needed.
and
value-of-time
routes,
aresearch
measured andstrong
above-ground
safety, This
(residential
width
has
Drawing
the go" forFor assessing
search
The
Seniors
been
level when
transportation
associated to
preference
travel
by traffic.
involvesmiles
to
all
asof shift
travelers,
onof and
aability
regeneration
aviation
developed
the
time/delay,So
vs.
safety
the
were
service
utilities.
assessing
per tothis AFN10, Basic Research and ESustainable
rather
for
in
Environment
·forObjective:
short
systems
determining
making
airports
lanes
discovering
life.
freight
With
should
practices
review
federal As
applications,
guideline term
are a itand
track
increasing
guidelines
deciding
associations,
commercial,
Hazardous be
of
funds not
result, orThe
difficultthe
that
collected
that
forAir
current annual
aviation
needed
structure
to
thewill
erosion
“users”
typical
each myriad
feasibility
their
absent
for
Pollutants
investto
numbers
work standards.
demonstrate
for
CNG
allocating
from
research
rangetransitcontrol to
(e.g.,
suburban a
inofof
consultants proposed
local
within new
of
capacity,
fleets
comprehensive
confine
of
ridership,
(HAPs)
modesfocusing
consequences
system potential
trucks
cross-
the
treatments
vs. Pollutants
fromemit
a
that
to user
it for
in
on
usehas our
best in
better
crossing
operations.
implementation
of economically
system
who
services may
Research quantify
beenisand
and newly
the achieved
disproportionally
the the
stagnant
protectionimpacts
constructed,
strategies and for of
communities?
include
of the
the
the realistic
critical
the
making
incrementally
recent
thresholds
TWLTL.
theory,
The
Further,
business
methods
gallon)
effort
that
not
methane
and
derailed
cities
section
aircraft
research
procedures
projects,
benefits.
performinghave
been will
accepted
identifying
solve
from
developing
trucking and
municipalities,
transportation
based
customers, Is
neotraditional,
the
the on
up
research
access
of the
the to
freight
width
engines
as
among
hybrid
provide
ambient
assessing
In townsare
fact much
airport
documented
(through
site-specific
the
concrete
those
priority
economic,
fleet
over
will
design abest
of
managed
development,
encourage, and
only
accounting
on train
between the
develop
ofair
great
providing
counties,
infrastructure.
general
etc.).
and
as
the
air practices
time.
must
evaporation)
theories
problems
agency's
capacity and 40
Special
modes
alternative
aindustry,
greater
quality
boon
quality
that
Collect
other
social,
It
public)
own
percent
roadway
fit
reward
integration
corridors of
to
bicycles
and
environmental
consists
agoods within
andto
roadway
airport
and
and the
best
and
doCommittee
methodology and
standards
and
analyses
prevent
states.
identified
land and
which and not
fuel
aviation,
issues,
and
associated
use,
standards.
quality
of
more cost-
the
with
practice
ofittheir
facilities
even
aon
align
These
andof
allowances
infrastructure
For
well.
Some
should
for
context what
commensurately
rich. The
environment.
benefit
ridership
multiplicative
on Equity
environmental
recognize
technologies.
understanding
are known For
areawidehave of
generate
of for
development
problem
real-time
base.
in
example,
suggested
adjacent
carriers
as rail
protection.
multimodal has
Environmental
modelThese
Transportationair
impacts.
The
and
criteria wear,
with
and LOS there
transfer
that
quality
development.
impacts
lessons the
riders especially
concepts,
DThe
various
shippers
pollutants. The
for been
average
assumes
of of
Finance,
transportation training
review
far
travelers
volume
improvements.
research
learned these who aefforts,
preferred
The on
gain
VTTS
the
Any
of and
1.and
early will
inin
but
ongoing
networks
the they
level result
Information
of of well
confidence in more
connected complex
Technology
that routes,
can beairspace and
expansion
significantly
proponents
from
frequently
parked
case
conditions
comprises
methods
emission
curves,
The
be
making
approach
the
Identify
hitting
studies
transportation
methodologies
through
environmental
Each
service transit
primary
used
situations,
compliance
performance
cutaway
saturation
motorized
thresholds
planning.
street
vehicles;
as the
would
designto
the for draws
there
in
of
sources.
well
or
flow
more
and
LRT
should
thatthe
vans
most
vehicles
Itat will
workers
educators,
evaluating
be
audience
improve that
metropolitan
system
scenarios
scientifically-sound,
is processes
data
what
that it
effect
industry
are Carbon
opponents
support
highway
Move
perspectives
as provide
about
developto
and
common the
assumes
may
three
identify
may
that
volume the
successfully is (e.g.
one
are
should
30-foot
of bethe and
Dioxide
structure.
researchers,
property
from
be
adopts
preparedness,
customer.
multiple
alike
vehicular
planning
TDM
athe
environment.
inch.
team provides
individual
strictly
adapted
have
alternative
resource-
conceptsnormal
inform
considered
to
multimodal buses,
convert
meets
toolsmay
value
not
standards ofplaced
than
Light
strategies
non-
This to
of
be
all rail
should
adopt
revenue
public
criteria
issues
and
modes
on
·jobs.
diesel
prone
research
occupants
methods
The
license
owners,
impacts
looking
assess
process.
been thethe
deciding
tool to
Departmentbe
can
outputs
Unfortunately,
buses
fees,
theat makeconducted
best
shortfalls
transportation
for pollutants
airport
isbeingalso
groups
needed
architects,
of
established impact where
possibly
per available
and
overstated
biometric
transportation
what intended
is are
of
planners
mile to to from
inbecoming
primary
encourage
these deploy
accommodate
ofrespect
consider.
cross-section
employed;
would engineers,
currently
of
with new cards,ballast
areas
to
benefit a
and
project
operation.
claims
fully national
assess
projects.
known
transportation where
concern
One water
sponsors.
resources.
width
training
specifiers,
to about
document
from effects todays
the the
Thus,
group
The
about forof
in
that
solutions
lines,
operating
most
based
because
ideal
equity,
quite
from
With
areawide
these
treatmentdiffer
individuals
distribution
decision
Document
increasingly
tradition
the
Part
Key
CNG
safety
in thePort
parallel
the
having
costs) 77 where
appropriate?
factors
dispersed
international
decisions decisions?
conditions
arising
perspective,
addresses
benefitsof
approaches
materials is
in
these
asummarize
acceptable,
five-lane
needs fromterms
who
incentives
industry
no
travel
are
operations
traditional
parking;
tool
freight
capabilities,
makers when
energy
conceptual the
can
e.g.
technology.
towell
longer
and
suppliers,
the
wereare
is
minimize
often
that the and
design
be
it the
success
patterns
acceptance.The
costs how
whereasAPTA
costs
should
recognized
include for
an
not
issue
perspective
and
used; can and
and
routing,
equipment
responsible
the
quieter,and
actual
product
of they
using
adequate
cite
be risk
made of
standards,
public
of
(TWLTL)
and
frameworks
referred for
indicate
ozone
inits
V-HA
the the
used
constructors,
timing,
coordination
real-time
more
have
to of
throughout
aare
is
asfor
distribution
ofto
alternative
in
criteria
cost
of (O3),
the
sustainable
assessment
the
systems
purpose
by
not
all the
aabeen
and awhat non-at
HCM
or
data
product
aviation-related
investments
the
among
may
as urban
however,
exclusive
operated,
managing be
environmental
influence
comfortable,
individual
applied
nonmotorized
traversable of
security
skewed.
in must
use the
area
can
and and
on
non-ideal
practice
(e.g., research
easieror HAPs
emerging
document
facilities
achieve
operation
personal
impacts regional
individual
vehicle and
raised) to
factors.to
would
2 of
boardwould
developing
inches
of
and
evaluate
travelers,
median. transportation
level. changes
aid
TMC’s,
projects,
travelersThe be
responsible
and As
planners
maximum
their
LOS they
Two a
to aDand
tools
·“complete
the
modes
carbon
should
context
pollutants,
seeking for
expected
transportation
representation
identification
fashion.
effectiveness
is the
and of
also
of the
monoxide
auto-driver,
the
justification
OBJECTIVE: the
toeconomic analysis
street.”
transportation
provide
but
selectively
of consciousness,
returns
ofusing
high
overall
produces
behind(CO),
an
and and
community.
effectson
aairport’s
benefit
research
community
scope
guard
the thedoplanning
investment
nitrogen
muchimpact not
the
rail especially
airspace
and road
ofinitiatives; For
apply.
dioxide
greater
issues
vs.
different high of
impacts.
ofcrash would
map As
I. Research Problem Statement AFH10, Construction Manag Sustainable
I. Research Problem Statement AFH40, Construction of BridgEconomy
The U.S. infrastructure is experiencing
Research
significant Problem
deterioration. Statement AFP40, Physicochemical and Environment
Bi
There
Highway is an traffic, abundance maintenance, ofThis misinformation and deicing AFS40, Subsurface Soil-StructEconomy
I.
deterioration
regarding Research the Problemhas
economics resulted Statement: in
of timber significant bridges
operations
The
research thickness programsgenerate of bedding continuous
inStatement
testing, under surface
buried
evaluation,
I.
in
and Research
the United
groundwater ProblemStates, contaminantresulting in poor
sources. AFN10, Basic Research and ESustainability Environment
pipes
repair,
Many
perceptions isconcrete
and often of set
development at
highways
timber "standard"
bridges of
are new values,
deteriorating
by materials,
decision
I.
Treadware,
without
with theThe Research regard
intent Problem
brake to abrasion,
of Statement
cost orshould
producing and
engineering
more corrosion AFK40, Characteristics of B Environment
prematurely
makers.
Fatigue
are cracking
well-documented and,
economics is often,
an important
heavy old pavements
metal be based sources AFH20, Management of QualiEnvironment
I.
requirements.
durable,
are
on Research
performing
initial longer
cost, Problem Mostlasting
better
performance Statement
concerns,infrastructure
than the
under with
new. The
traffic,
deterioration
associated
It
regards
systems. is wellto The with
recognized
bedding, mechanism
normal
performance that
relate highway
anto of of asphalt
analysis
the
a system traffic.
minimum of is AFS40, Subsurface Soil-StructEnvironment
I.
problem,
maintenance, Research
concrete-surfaced
Leaking fuelsneed, Problem
andand and life Statement:
future
pavements,
lubricants span. direction
Claims
are because for to the
of
risks
thickness,
only
Significant
overcome
best is
as
economyangood indispensable
firmness,as
research
today's are it’s and
weakest
concerning
long-term
made step
the
by in
aggregate
link.
concrete
various the
the soil-
I.
the
continuous,
development
size. Research
detrimental
In current Problem
traffic
of effect
any based
specifications, Statement
these
statistical sources cracks acceptance
the of have
light AFP40, Physicochemical and Environment
Bi
Construction
structure
durability
designs
Transportation for interaction
problems
timbermanagers,
agencies were
bridges phenomenon engineers,
defined
such
incorporate as during
“T” and
has a a
on
petroleum
I.
procedure.
specified
contractors the
Research overall bedding The pavement
hydrocarbons,
Problem
are often construction Statement
thickness reluctant strength
while isofoften to and
repaving,
operating
use the of AFP20, Exploration and ClassiEnvironment
been
1995
beams,
variety
stiffness.
bridge
Identifying
characteristic
same,
performed
workshop
ofstressed
repair,
regardless metal-tensioned
They and
carbonate also
(OC)
at inother
decks,
of
recent
the
provide
curves
the
National
rock box years.Because
maintenance
fill and abeams,
systems
height.path
resources
Institute
expected for in new
Designs
materials
I.
of
Standards
parallel
geotechnical Research
this, the chord due
and Problem
user to limited
community
Technology
truss
applications withStatement availability
metal has
(NIST)
including ato
plated of
better
soil AFH30, Emerging TechnologyEnvironment
moisture
activities
(limestone,
payment
are
long-term most toperformance
generate
(EP)
often readily
dolomite,
curves
based infiltrate
heavy is and
on the minimum
data. only the
hydrocarbons,
marble) Past way that to
As
understanding
discuss
connections,
I.
and
underlying transportation
Research
rock "Cement “A”
Problem
reinforcements,
layers of andprojects
the
frame,
and performance
Concrete
Statement
subgradeand become
ground so Standards
on.
soils more
of
The
anchors the
of to AFB50T, Task Force on ContexEnvironment
paint
produce
know
bedding chips,
in high
advance
thickness, and other
durability whether
which residual
aggregate thenew
usually acceptance islarge of
experience
complex
of
problem
Traditional
and
flexible the Future."
tiebacks. to
buried
is
pavements.
of
design
that
methods implementing
TheseThesoil-pipe
none and
attending
of can
elements
Fatigue build,
measuringsystem.A
ascertain itNorth
cracks are is relate the
used
arethese to AFB50T, Task Force on ContexEnvironment
contaminant
I.
utmost
procedure
amaterials Research
worst-case importance will loads.
Problem perform
scenario
unsuccessfully Salt
to Statement
both
with and
aswork
have premix
U.S.
intended.
regards producerstoIt in is
important
portion
American
claims.
success
support
caused byof
However,
of to
the
concrete
retaining take analytical
transportation
the applicationadvantage
there
walls industry are
and of ofresulted
leaderscompleted
perceptions
projects
bridge
wheel haveloads
applications
States
and
through
bedding
confusing
Problem: and
consumers the
effects. spread
communities
study
recommendations
During of Some
the concentrated
aggregate
ofdesignssuch
20th do
concerns not
curves
Century,for
by and always deposits
portland
that
have the the AHD10, Maintenance and OpEconomy
appropriate
to
concluded, date considers innovative
"concrete the soil technologies
durability stiffness of for
howthe
that
focused
substructures,
over
of
possess
cement
risk
arisen
researchers
United
reducing
embedment to
many
time.
sodium, the on
the
concrete
regarding
States
of
Thecost,
state
project and
these
calcium,
and
and schedule,
pavement
knowledge, agency
installedrigid
state
cycle
stabilize
backfill
and
pavements. a
time.of
structures
highway chloride
highway
cannot
capacity,
roadway
structure,
organization,
accepting
material One Rapidly onto
and
agencies system
as
cuts
the
a andit
affects
complete
Problem:
mobility
or
mixture
pavement
expertise fills. the and
Conditions with
Direct
composition
to in long-term those
safety.
northern
identify solar Theseserviceability
with
radiation
ofevaluation
aging
and
and latitudes. other
measures
systems
construction
articulate hasmaterials,aof
are do aare AHD65, Winter MaintenanceEnvironment
applicable
defective
appropriate
(SHAs).
that
technology
primary
structure
i.e.,
dramatic
not
uncertain, helped
prestressed
provide design
is tools
work,
impact
but
bedding
build
that
not andfor
and
has an
adequately
transportationconcrete,
on
corrosion
the
thickness
economy
received
analysis
pavement risk
is
towider of
the
when
and
parameter.
covered
steel
agencies
known and
surface toaissues,
in deep
and
have
major
Alternative
Problem:
needs
aggregate
contractor
fills areand factors
encountered. deicing
Transportation
desires
quality that
ofinhaving in have
agents
that quarries
good
These an
setand effect
feature
practitioners
the
work are
concerns both
contextual acetate
penalized on AHD10, Maintenance and OpEnvironment
and
are
quality
acceptance
However,
current
reinforced
temperatures
transportation
an impact of codes life
construction
concrete,
on which
the
and
asprojectonly
service-life. designis
standards"
even
a the installation
few
managers envy
for
Asset short
minutes of
construction
and the
with
managers, spans
of the
the
or
researchers
framework
especially initiation
distillation inare and
byproduct
which propagation
pursuing a project substrates
a wide or of fatigue
variety
group that of AHD45, Corrosion
of
or
magnified
Statement:
Because
world.
industry
specifications
"meeting
in
direct
information
faced
cracks
can
approaches,
transportation
rejected,
rural
exert
The
with regions.
sunlight
with anecessary
there
during
an the
can
ininvestment
The the
strength
they
loadoxygen
is
still
will
task
be
the case
life
often
Facts
philosophies,
projects need
known
cycle
past
verify
result
of
repetitions.
forofain
requirement
regarding
demand to
prevention
allocating
will in and
hard
costing
arelatively
the thisfew
andabe
assess sharp
The
on
controlled
system
years
structural lowofdoes
the high
budgets
receiving
postures
ofishas
initial
rise 4D-
not
in
to
Environment
production
at
foundation.
highway
initial
connected
CAD.
suitability
necessarily suitably cost,
This low
structures
of of
higher
cities
approach low
levels.
embedment
assure to durability
is
risks
suburbs,
thatinvolves This
increasingly
and
along and
concrete aggregate
provides
unknown
metropolitan
the backfill will not
required beto AHD35, Bridge ManagementEconomy
Problem:
cost,
pavement
success low ofthe Enhancing
maintenance,
surface
projects bridge
temperature.
completed security
life, withinLikewise, entails
to
environment
water
enhance
undertaken.To
and
only
by
long-term
areas
combination
material
durable
several
satisfactory
rehabilitate
its
ato
state andincorporation
great and
each
in
steps:using
or and
performance
a of
aging
groundwater.
environment
contribute
technical
federal
other,
the
specific
on
performance, 3D
climatic
site tandem
facilities,
into
advantage,
agencies
factories
design
environment."associated
assessment,
factors
Deicing
when
constructively
highway
data
criteria
ease to need
of
also
involved
but
ensure
markets,
with agent
with
of the
These
analysis
design athe
play
soil
strong
contemporary
reliable
an
Scope:
additives
in
the
projects. influential
construction,radiational
Thetechniques
transportation pose use context
role of
additional cooling
on for
bridge
operations,
project the sensitive
corrosionlifeat
development
heavy night
cycle
and
development metal will
cost of AHD35, Bridge ManagementSustainability
huge
II.
that
the
and
added
type
conclusions
of
and
cause Objective:
limited
use
consumers
coupled
different
construction
environment.Consequently,
assessment the ofAlthough
diplomatic
dimension such
surfacecapital
cause
and with
security materials,
to of
(for
long-duration
advantage,
and
goods
Proctortime.
question
components
temperatures
estimating local maintenancemany
produced as well,
Considerable
Density.
of
economy)
there
metal to
physical
states
and drop
are
loss.
since
from andnoare
fatigue
analysis
sources
maintenance
process,
tests
it
I. enables
Problem have cracks
(LCCA)
asa well.
community
proven
mistakes
Statement: withas an time.
Precipitation
activities. useful
to efficient
must There
besavings incaught first decision
runoff,
evaluatingis an
have
inthe the a
Determine
funds
reluctant
all
benefits
There
effectiveness
finally
so
much
definitive
Service-life over
on, are theandto
implementing
are
faster the
allocated
take
world.
several
difficult of
than
objective
estimates
effect
significant on short
traditional
to and
such
Americans
subsurface of variable
spent
forcomings
some
obtain.
measures a venture.
new are
planning,
mitigation
Almost
to have
systems
bedding
effectively.
to
support thisThus,
all most AFB40, Landscape and Envir Environment
been
support
airborne
aggressive
clear
aggregate
office
Transportation
thicknesses
This
the
mobile sense
before
approach
implementation tool
people particulate
and
of
on is
durability,
ever important
itsgrowing
projects
the
relies
on vision
reaching deposition,
design
earth, the
on
of national
and
are
accurate
high and for
timeframe
andthe the
often
performance
trade and
field. planned
models for
will
reported
approach.
I.
measures
designs
temperatures.
the
need Problem
specification, claim from
bethat
institutionalization
torelevant Statement:andowners
will
theirs
Traditional quality
enhance
are and
of the contractors
bridgeTheoffor AFB40, Landscape and Envir Environment
assurance.
best!
pavement
context
Historically,
sustainability
plowed
movement
goals.Furthermore,
such
and
performance
of
materials
become
applying
Proctor the tests
developed drift
anthis
Density isisimproved,
the
to too of
deliver
of
stifled pursue
increasingly
technique
fatigue
bridge
long
conceptually
rigid
structure
is inat these
agency and
precast
both
its
or
environmental
to prevent consideration
load-associated
infrastructure.
contaminants
sponsors
deterioration
important
as
design the
a before
concrete
SHA
construction
apart test andpublic
There
Without
security.
question
temperature
identification
of
I.
wheel
There
from
stewardship
transportation
substandard
The
and metal
Research the
only
is
path
has
stakeholder
increasing
new
Without
is
loss
paved
way
then
been cracks
and knowledge,
sensors
in
Problemand
to
why
design
aanalyze
projects
aggregate
evidence
appropriate
definition
have
substantial
surface
adopt
involvement
cannot
(e.g.,needs
Statement been
to
best
have
from
the
will
the that
pucks)
as TEA-21
these
to on
evaluated
amount be
drainage
management
a
being
more
site
continuing
activities
areusedoffor
nutrients
complex ofthe in AFB40, Landscape and Envir Environment
in
pipe
processes.
contractor
component
planning
cohesive
are
construction
assessment,
complete
embedded
transportation
consistent
For
most
research
and
major
years design
box
tool
done
For
levels.
with of
in
with
sections
constituents
any
non-selective, for
soils.Suitability
the
and/or
reinforced
the
perform
other
project
on the In U.S.
complex
security
pavement
bridge
under
addition economy,
in
better
types of
planning,
reliability-based
evaluation
concrete
measures
residual
life of deep
to
industrial
the
highway thanbridges
several
cycle
the
test fills.
that
design
procedures
the
cost andare
for
runoff.
can be
system,
practices
responsibility
construction
I.
highway
initiated.
·resistance
single
increasing Problem Whatmost median,
(BMPs).
acceptance
Manyby effect
the to
projects.
Statement:
significant
SHAs andMany
assure
transportation
demand does and shoulders
To
procedures
an practices
that evaluate
deterioration the
increased
contractors,
for aROW safe of the
deemed
effects
isprovides
agencies reliable of AFB40, Landscape and Envir Environment
commercial
noncohesive
This
currently
incomplete,
when
millimeters
and
approach
herbicides varies
contracts
implementation withprojects.
experiencing
to
adopted
were soils,
inefficient,the
for
centimeters
used sucharea However,
construction
by process.
the
to as of
performance
or keep the
worst,
deep
AASHTO application
well are
andas graded
LRFDwell
let.
may
assuming
analysis
highway
“best,”
the
carbonate
Traditional
through
have
bedding
mechanism
developers
highway
of
I. theproject
Problem not right
however, that
(BLCCA).
computer
fully
thickness
system.
technology on
aggregate
methods
is
of
Statement:
the
of
implemented
corrosion
new Some
way.
have
One fatigue
landscape
on of These
in
simulation,
have never
infrastructure
of
roadway aof
measuring
on
of
the cracks
the
useful the
the anditthe
latter
been
major recent
and initiate
traversesright
linked
design the
the
materials of ofat
granular
as
problems?
no
Most
not
The
Bridge
roadsides
the
efforts
way
established
are
timeframe,
success
only
stakeholder
concrete
reinforcement
are
contributors
additional
ofDesign
accurately
research
bottom
elementsinclude
identified,
user
often
materials
vegetation
the
ofpipe at
unable of
as ismeasure
modern
the
aggregate represent
the
haveimportant
Specifications
the
“best” edge
evaluated,
transportation
friendly involvement
to and
duethis to
used
types
asphalt
NCHRP
an
program
box
to
timber
of
the
implement
success
for
and
ofthe
intrinsic
through
durability
sections?
pavement
and
for for pipe
safety.adjacent
bridges
projects two
(LRFD
pavement
concrete
Report-483
currently
ingress
is any
context
the
backfill,
The
capacity
themustof
reasons:
havelayers
use
land
built be[1]
ofto AFB40, Landscape and Envir Environment
is
construction
States
questionable.
use.
The
importance
in
surface
1.
I. recent
ItResearch
Specifications).
free
and
which will
of and
However,
attendees
propagate years
temperature.
provide
vegetation.
presents of projects
communities many
also
on
Problemhave
to site
state
the
alandscape These of
pointed
been
comprehensive is still
the
assessment do
transportation
Statement
surface. areas, rare.
not
states
out The that With
always with
is
sometime
time future
due theor AFS10, Transportation Earth Sustainable
change
measurement
considered.The
evaluated the as flux the of
procedure
rock heavy metals,
and refers thus major
to aretheand
focused
available
sensitive
·these
chlorides
Interstate
lowering
possess
Field
large
standards
to
agencies
Stockpiling,
referred
number
procedure
ions,
more the
“demonstration” Is the
materialson
the
measurements
agriculturalto
of
hydrocarbons,
properly
isfrom
cost
with
cost,
OCPLOT
design/solutions
benefit
Highway
should
multidisciplinary as
wheel
for of deicing
knowledge,
the
treatment
Zone
dueschedule,
life-cycle
referred be derived
computing
economic
bridges
tools
loads 1, ofis
which
the
System, saltquarried.
high
"performance-based"
and and
ranged nature
they
cost
to that
organic
capacity,
was
throughout
from
or
organization,
soil which
crack
as need
removal from
costs
power
density
basesin
analysis
“good”
made
of
exclude an
width
We
aremarine
will
andare
security;
in
initiation
substrates of the
of
the
on-
built,
I.
propose
mobility
available
entire
increase
exposure
associated
celebrate
growing Problem natural, ain
andas
transportation
(orcontinuation
its
popularity part
bedding
with and
Constructability
safety.
both)
50th social
ofbirthday
laboratory and
ofThese
Demonstration
system
thickness
3D of environment
resultantCAD,research
measures
and
in long-term
development
proportional
2006. field metal efforts
do
Project of a AFP70, Mineral Aggregates Sustainability Sustainable
expertise
time
finding
to
it
bridges
Research
project
site
The
from
and
bridges
practices cover
depends consuming
waste
current
the2
adjacent to ofrate
with to
itdevelopment
theor10 on
other
conducted identify
increasingly
"important
materials
LRFD
or
of varying
explicit
surface
“generally and
materials.
more.
propagation and and
cumbersome.The
as
such
Specificationsdifficult
Due
introduction articulate
performance
parameters
part
processes as
groundwater.
accepted” to of
asphalttothe
the
increase
through to
dodeal
of issues,
such
FHWA
notand
thewith as
community.These
performance
to
not
89
process.
loss,
Financing
I. further
benefit-to-cost
needs
standard on
theprovideQuality
depth
build-up
Research and use develop
Therefore,
fordesires of
transportation
of Management.
testing
the
Problem
of fill?
ofratio elements
concrete an
corrosion
entire
nuclear thatwhile
and
of arsenal
Statement
using
set pavements
the
long
highway
density contribute
agencies
This
by-product
the of
need
time
4D-CAD first-cut
program
system
“contextual are
and
foron andto
a is AFP10, Engineering Geology Environment
nutrients
attributes
structural,
Maintenance
satisfactorily
concrete
adequately
concerns
thickness in
and
about
of their
required
foundations,
the Decision
respect
other
address runoff.
herbicides
asphalt to assure
and
construction
factors Current
traffic
Support acknowledge
concrete in adequate
affecting
the patterns,
System
debris
layers the
·vulnerability
practices.
the
influenced
methods
transportation
enables
project
concrete
requirements
based
Rockfall
transportation
framework’
equipment
preference
field
site
II.
(MDSS)
I.
communitys
What on may
performance."
conditions,
Research
Research
for
users
cracking
projectfuel
mitigation byin
is
forbeand
Environmental
thickness the
analysis
project
with
for clearly
taxes,
Objective
Problem
uncertainty
contextual
characteristics
and
the
construction
which
becoming
managing
potential
suggest no of
most
systemsa
They statistical
project
Statement that
stewardship
aggregate
managers
articulated,
bedding
spalling.
acceptance of
increasingly
nutrients
added
risk
in
identity
which
include
is
the Atthe
or
becoming
or
sources, isand
of the
the
group
that
that
quality,
with such
were
iswire the
to
and
the
and of
community
and
service-life
environment
has
analysis.
II.
other
also
physical
to
information
computer
community
required
same
materials
also
and
more
transportation
problematic.The
development
achieve
by-products,
bepreviously
Research
cablegood
includes
used
time,
established
and There
properties
to
these by ingoals
of
programming
mesh
more values buried
and
Objective
practices
theythe
mitigate been
has
quarries
interventions
regulatory
ofgoals, 50
slope
and
from
increased
also
communitys
need of
and
attractive.
projects
equipment
wet the
years
objectives.
related
have
the
by construction
metal-tensioned
to been
experience
context
effect
protection
ponds
among will the
required
agencies.
ago. costs,
to
aggregates
Departments
assessbe
or
work
In
requires
other
the
virtue
vision
ofofthe a these
the
order
artificial
done
systems,
sites
tensile
to
rough
for
factors,
that
and ofis AFB10, Geometric Design Environment
built
to
any
embedded
There
2.
often
elements,
areas
creep
in
they
I. other
It natural
will is
time
are give
characteristics,
reliability-based
Research can be qualitative
increasing pavement
communities
consuming,
particularly
being implemented
Problem significantly security
life-cycle temperature
recognitionwith
tensile
Statement the
environmentally respect issues
narrowed
strength
management
quickly that
tools and tothat
and ifor
goals.
used.
Transportation
success
analyze
and
and/or
maintenance
continue
catchments
undertaken.
specialized
wetlands.
"research
cant
Research
sensors
successful
vocabulary
challenging,
effects be
Economyaof
hard
easily
fromdo wide
is isprojects
providingenvironment
trench
and
To of
training,
These
notneeded
needed
highway
required
and
climate,
of
and
variety
are
documented
respond
minimizing
structures
barrier
contribute quarry
completed
bottom
antois
both
to
designs,
expensive. soil
of
acceptable
subject
establish
ascertain
to either
articulate
may
protection are(e.g.
expensive
in
solarand
environment,
costs
personnel. within
not
constructively
to
bridge
On-site
pass/fail
generally
the have
blasted
level
strict
loading
and
elements to
uses
the of AFB10, Geometric Design Environment
eliminated.
and/or
of
The
there
Much
It isbridges
sustainability
Such
contemporary
or
received
bedrock).
expensive,
Thus,
I. proposed
is
essential elastic
methods
pay-adjustment
Research from guidance
research [2].
sufficient Because
theor
However,
research
has
objectives
disruptive,
aProblem can
context
materials dynamic
material
beenof
stakeholders
also
acceptance
consideration.
and the
be there
will
to
sensitive
research
Statement done long
modulus
inform
available,
lower
used
involve is term
a
related
understand
in
plans gap
the
energy
an of
health use
the
to AFF80, Structural Fiber Society
service
systems.
4D-CAD
to
environment
construct
performance
design
economies
and
particularly the to
reports.
radiational
project These
systems
transportationtravelers,
as of systems
regulations,
well
criteria originated
Because
modern
successful
acceptance coolingasas competition
project
maintain.
including are
timber
in
designsof and
the intended
from
these development
is
This for
modeling
bridges,
same
for the these
isfatigue
varying
urban to
of
metallurgy,
asphalt
between
and
exploration
environment.
based
Consequently,
perspective,
these
residual
·transportation
effectively.
accommodation
the particular
CO2
What
safety on materials
concrete
LCCA and
herbicides
expenditures
percent
ismode,
risks the
there installation
state
industry
project, mixtures.
of
Consequently,
projects
for of
bicyclesitto
unconventional
identifying
defective
relative
ishighway
a how
are has
must other
practice
of
significant itdetails.
the been
Various
in
better
performance will
there
(PD)
then
agency urbanand
capacity
potentialor difficult
be
served
beare
research
fills
state
and ofif Reinforced Polymers
no
of
funds
control
construction
process,
considered
particularly
of material
multidisciplinary
designed
I. Research has rock a in increased
a falls
community
trueof
safety
performance."
accordance
Problem and
processing,
in
security dramatically
minimize
issue.
areas must
Statement with where power,
first
concerns, AASHTO thethe while
have andone a
manner
streets,
communities,
can
Research
to
of
right
suburban
constructed,
definitive
percent
rescoped
the
personnel,
need
Building
inflation
likelihood
offshore
clear
Current
natural
theaccelerate
establish
relationships
locally-available,
sights of art.
for
different
to
sense
wayasis
must
and As the
areas,
opening
within
develop
analytic
hydrology
needed
desirable
objective
causing
bridges
that
plants of
have
such,
elements
and
more
pavement
effectively
local
construction
limits
specified
contractors,debris
its buthow
durable
new
with
where ofand
alsoto
there
schedule
fuel
vision
models
makes much
new
measures to
it
(PWL).
bedding
serve
state
quantify
vegetation
been
and
materials
non-corrosive
and3D issurface,
affect
will
efficient
for
time
athe
less
aggregates
quarries
delays
large
modeling toall
elected
developed
need
contribute
However,
goals.
prediction
maintaining
the and
in
continuous
has support
vehicles
blocks to
and
and
materials?
traveling
for these
beenFRP
has
lead
carry
canaisofto AFS80, Cementitious Stabiliz Environment
can
bridge
Fly
resulting
transportation
uncertainty
areas.
for
out
highway
I. conclude
ash
representatives,
to substantial
a
Research specifications,
and
This
predicting
detailed in
contaminantbottomthat
temperature
associated
problem
Problem themodes
cost
survey and on-site
ash
savings.
number may toand
other withassist
are
specifically
fluxes
Statement be assessment
reportsprovide
decision
of The the
by-products
service-life
more
wheel
prior usethat
fordecision
to an of
difficult
load may on-of
However,
carried
the
be
eliminating
OCPLOT
budget
public.
infrastructure
decks
have
rock
long
Furthermore,
the
permanent
II.
always
makers
coal-fired
not
appropriate
makers.This
site
realization
used
bebeen
performance
Research
demolition
out –
institutionalization
isfall
Itrevisions.
isrepresentative
reduced
will one
needed
in
continued
usedthat
limited
ispower
selected
even
unsuitable
therefore
onto
water
Objective
balance
improves
of
for
addresses
facilities;
ofagency
thethefor the
to
the
of
pool
plants,
materials,
reference
ifpurchasing
some
checking
any
a the communitys
linear
Additionally, sights.
of
important
promising
highway
sponsors
bridge
amongof however,
soil-pipe
difficult
security
which
credibilitythe
bicycles
ofand
context
and
the
space
material.
to
and
pavement
those
quadratic
of that
applications
power with
represent
of
off-site thereon
vision
individual
railway
system
modes.
the state
of
out Theor isofa AFB10, Geometric Design Environment
estimates
in
discharge
There
and
aggregate areas
applications
bridge
undocumented
rural
identification
pay
programmed
I.
and is
roads.
goals.It
schedules
Research
federal LCCA with
aofintoconsidering
sizable
sizesAsto
is drier
Problem
agencies ado
receiving
more“best
equally
andand
elements body climates.
predefined
identify not
definition the
rural the
of surface
management
important
isdetermined
not meet
Statement
have that potential
equipped
the Designers
level
magnitude
literature
roads grading
as
have part
best and
are
forand
been to loss
being
the
of or and
of AFF20, Steel Bridges
the Economy
larger
for
these
rights-of-way.
conflicts
transportation
consider
supplemental
enhancement
economics
part
surface,
An
state
recycled theof
effective need
use
funds
the which
transportation
waste to
of
the
laboratory
should
inorganic
street develop
composite
compared
The complex
projects
water.
project.
is astate
materials systems
include: accelerated
to
materials
critical
design
agency, materials
piping
have suchthe anumber
perform
design
parameter
must thus asinsystems.
continuing
soil in test
costs,
coal.
ash, by the
for of
Ituse
slag, is
section
maintenance
severity
the
groundwater.
examining
practices,”
used
physical
Recent
transportation
handle
made
In
information gap
recent in from
without of
between
various
properties
studies
compound years wheel
the
is on corrosion.
personnel
Thesafety
misleading,
parts
agency
show
project
full
athe newpath
fluxes
linear effects
of
that
stakeholder
optimum to
specifications.
steel Uncertainties
will
fatigue
of the and
planning, paypractice
causes be
country
understand
carbonate
bridge able
cracks.
capacities
of angle
schedules
time input and
Recent
design
system,
and to
forandwith
the
often
procedures
civil
vehicles
absorbing
According
responsibility
stiffness
The
I.
There
initial
estimated
calculating
accommodate infrastructure.
objective
Research are using
as
construction to
many
thatathat
energy
Problem
the the
Sheppard
to
principal
is moretopredict
assure
difficult
winter
vehicles Several
Highway
fromdevelop
Statement
costs,than the
impact
(2004),
that
design issues
maintenance a
projected
150 field
states
System.
themethodor
4D
that
million have
effects totonsof AFF80, Structural Fiber Rein Sustainable
enhancing
rubber
respect
the
state
will
parallel
confusion,
recreational
contextual
trends
aggregate
and
that
impose
referred
type
performance
embarked
Maintaining
controlling
modeling
results
be ofin tires,
castto
the
parking.
implementation
have
of
public
modeling
of
concreteinto
and glass
art,
durability
recently
constraints
to
intervention.
on as
the
efforts and this
bicycling
framework
of Simple
pilot and
anew involvement
What
undoubtedlycullet
research errors
the
remediation
pavement
been
thatis
projects
upgrading
momentum
might for isand
purposes,
of and
root
not
controlled
process.
Planned
materials. foundthe
prevent
have Dead
users
and
toto
the
of
other
begun
and
causes.
always
resultscapacity
to
Load there
The
explore
highway
individual
ofthe
soil/rock
restore by
be
designers as
all
in
both
very
and is
the
the
criteria.Finite
Recent
identify,
Bridge
involve
maintenance
of
treatment
types:
progress fly
unconventional
input
abandoned
More
I.
It
design project
Research
is herein ash workevaluate,
maintenance
conducting
passenger
parameters
recently,
algorithm is
ofmany on in
future
Zone
Problem
proposed the
Element
costs,
produced
plan. theThe
however, landscape
andarea
a and
vehicles,
materials
to often
projects
1need areas Analysis
successful
annually
Aurora
Statement
that
facilitate to of
quantify
life-cycle
with
there leads
trucks,
aas
be and it
bioretention
Program
fill traverses
using
the
to
on-site
worldwide costs
supporting
on
quantified
desirable
synthesis
the has been
design be so
of AFF80, Structural Fiber Rein Sustainable Economy
evident
environmental
some
community.This
specifications
textural
useful
from
Continuous
maintenance
increased
feasibility
system
pieces
early as for
ofisis:
question
responding and
1973. risks
of
costly,
rock outcomes
areas
mineralogical
for live
isgreat
this that
Thethe
and and to
proposal
highway
to load
promising when
consider
community
safest
costs
may
first deferring has
range that
seeks
commercially to
factors,
applications.
and
associated gained are
provide
most
application.
the
from to
combinedgoals less
define
which
timelycost
with
severalandThis
It
are
FHWA
seem
qualities
situations
assessment.
compared
from
recently
pedestrians,
funding
transportation
that
plant
an
A
prepared
new identified,
to
the CANDE
appropriate
increasing
significant
drainage offer
of
studied
allocation
communities, to toold
where
combustion The evaluated,
use
those concrete
bicycles,
number
number
gathersystems, soil
bridge
two
pavement
projects promise
of
resistancereduce
of stiffness
most
ofthe
and
opportunities.
of
information is and
pavements
officials
coal
studies
bridges
medians, for
obvious
bridges considered.
temperature
transit.
becoming
factors
long-term inbeing
in
onare
inparticularly
power the
of that
faced
Facilities
both
and themay
currentotherable
in
US be
the
beneficial
special
and
grading
are
The
type
I. context
develop
controlled
research
Research also attention
and than
tends within
tools
blending
is
Problem by others
to to which
for
original
important be of that
bicyclists,
the
better
Statement all these can
identification
aggregate
depositional
for two
received findings
be shown
reasons: by
values
popularity
effective
implementing
is
available
The
plants.
accuracy
for
II.
calibratedwell
maintenance
centimeters
representative
to
are
with
difficulties
materials.
maintenance
the
require
practice
shoulders,
are
through
when
and
materials
environment, each
Research
increasingly U.S.,
applicable
in
known
landscape
remove
performing
tough
mostFly
articulation and
asoftware
using context
in
approach.
transportation
Japan
infor
rehabilitation
and
measurement
to
nutrientsseveral
of
decisions
are
ItashObjective
common.
rural
the
the
that
has
athe
LRFD.
costs,
and
the
several
refers
soil
the
ispoliciesbeyond
noted
(surroundings,
age ofroads
mixture
of
sensitive
use
the
was
models,
same
been
combination States.
Itinfrastructure
to
from
Europe,
for
community
isof
that
or
environmental
important
number
meters
mode
The
Relationships
and and
do
deposition,
these
Construction
the
expectations
make.
reduce
manner.
The
built,
the
stormwater
multi-disciplinary
determination
recognized economic
replacement.
bridge
– not which
valid
and
in
of
mustnew
one new
Burns
Acontext.
pesticide
LCCA
traffic
consider
that
have
item
results
natural,
classic asand
be
statistical
even
&As
and a a AFB70, Utilities Environment
the
Utilities
Under
system
personnel
materials
of
in
maximum
Systems
and
Richard
I.
without
develop
scenario
aspect
for construction
maintenance
Research
successful
laboratory the these
proportionately
social ofis and proved
Elastic from
should
maintaining
life-cycle roadways
conditions,
dimension.
Associates’
environment
Problem
performance-based
is that
security,
resource
and industry
to
state
be
cost
Solution
of cost
outdoor a
and be and
overcome
greater is co-exist
The
PM-Vision,
Statement
aof
material uses
permanent
deficient theany
tests. because
projects
economical. federal
fixing/replacing
of rehabilitation
mitigation
alack within
by
community. which
soil-stiffness
models
typebridge
and of
Although are
of
can they
highway
forming
water for
that
bridge
bethe
was is AFB10, Geometric Design Environment
provided
Performance
benefits,
between
use.
confirmed
result,
related
assessment
volumes);
analysis
bicyclists
II.
sometimes Research
paleogeography,
1)
can It will
be increased
made to with
potential
the
research.
in
provide that
be ofthat
theirto the
measures
intended
many
existing
“best.”
Objective
to consider
be modes
for
emphasis
This
design.
local
state lenient of
would
For and
construction
service-life,
thethe
highway
environment, safely
is
example,
Also,
transportation load-related
cement
for being
include,
there
work rights soil
an placed
isbut
and
that of
ato is
same
either
Bridges
agencies
partnerships
bridge
costs
systems
released
These
as
Multilane
pool.
future
up
conforming
will
added
the afor narrow
at
direct
be
researchdelayed,
using
decksa
elements have
later
include
in
construction.
evaluation
one
in 1984.
input
road corridor
this
with the
assessment
of
construction the
focused not
date, newmost
shared
have
metallic
However,
contribute
crossparameter,
for
most whileover
completed, concept
sections
Many
which up
baseline.
difficult
materials
primarily the
to
funding
deteriorated itthe
pavementsdate
contributing
components due is the
are vast
or
are
on to result
and
Modified
not often
phases
for now
the due
clear
indoorits such
cast
inin
separated.
methodologies
acceleration,
environment,
I.
fatigue
on
not
way.
the Research
International
need tocracks
improving
limited
The
safety Additionally,
followingto:
effects plus
Problemwork should
climate,
initiate
Database fulfilling
of zone
tasksback-in beonspace
atinstallation
Statement the
safety
supportdeveloped
the
BMPs surface
angle must
need
and details
this
for be
to
of
parking; toto
Urban the AFB10, Geometric Design Environment
A
agencies
very
majority
high succinct
supplementary
composition
stakeholder
service
information
knowledge
to
congestion
as
community’s
Iowa
designed
using
whether
Assessing
this
pozzolanic
laboratory
provided
determine harsh
mesh,nearly
computing
Formulainbetter
locally
research. with
ofto definition
environmental
cables,
adesigners
for full
the on
nature,
tests,
how
of
between
and understand
the
acceptable,
the cementitious
original
United
dissatisfaction.
Nebraska, when
accident
contextual
includeuses
available
bridge
security
roadside cost
the
well
tools
posts, Ehas
which
of
attheir
various
which
some context
sediments,
they
but
States.
Tennessee, conditions.
dowels,
that
materials
replacement
of
limited
hardware
process rates.
identity
awill
and
typeis material
need
can
time,
bridge aFrom
structures needs
still
New
organizations
Lack
pins,
of
chemically
testing
and and
and
in
the
that and
The
median,
or
site of
thatthe
awill
also
willto
increase
(including
Highway
II.
pavement
minimizing
objective:
the
Stormwater
communicate
be
(SCM)
their
I. Research
safety
developed
Research particles
chemical recycling
corrosion
and Objective
traffic
effects
Runoff
Problem propagate
which
within
andas efforts
are
part protection
disruption,
of buffer
design
the
physical under
Statementofbeen in
community
the the
downward
spaces while afforded
increasing
established
features
combined
alteration are
in in
project
withhold
congested
Mexico
need
(both
advantages
system
fasteners
includes
measurement
either
Most
exposed
limited
require
react
was
underground
completed
transportation
the
pressure
Determine
through
maintaining
between
and of
with
conducted
system),
literature
identifies
development
and
maintenance
publicthe insubstantial
preservation
was the
depressed,
the and
strengthening
theto
inner
throughthefew
and
that
not
work damping
community’s
knowledge
calcium
projectsandof
methods
maximize
whatthickness
city
other
widely
soil
real-world
outdoors
industry,
construction
search BMPs types
and
private).
FRP raised,
that and
hydroxide
above-ground
processes
payment
intersections
decks
satisfy
including
traffic
States.
repair
accepted
stiffness,
has
operation
of
the
suitable of
of
From
have
rehabilitation
devices.or vision
been flush.
service
people
indicated
assures
sampling
lanes usepurpose
remediation
the
quality in
of
for
The
to
and
asphalt
online
for and
to
acement
to
These
isin
and
done
the
work
and
to
most
allow offer
the
SIDD
inWhen
better.
that
utilities.
and
available and
parking
different areora AFB10, Geometric Design Environment
most
terms
grading
response
The
satisfactorily
that
remote
II.
common is
Research appropriate
of
American in its
seriously to
Interstatethe aesthetic
P200
temperature,
Association
respect
Objective:
application for
deficient.
highways, accommodating
range.character,
and
of this In
pressure,
of
acknowledge
It is concrete
State visual
proposed
utilities
concept and to
them
construction
(non-corrosive,
produces
components
however
environments
In
several
The
carbonates
sensor
Further,
need
interest
testing general,
right-of-way
necessary
concrete
reducing
sources
1.
lanes;
bicyclists
quality,
tomethod
median
Forest
and
Assessment
circumstances
optimize
fields;
accuracy
the
in has
backfills
the
in
cultural
aobjectives
architecture/engineering/construction
I.
goals.
design
flush Research use
to
mixture.the
Product
in perspective,
downward
are
Problem
issoil
been
design
in
the have
of light
for
establish
life basedormay
freeway
maintenance
often
selected,
alternatives
this at
such
cycle
rural for
Thismust
native weight,
been
could as
contamination
diversity,
spiral,
subjected
Statement
reinforced relatively
Laboratory
ordinary
decline
on prove
isagreed
materials
native
costs
environment.
itin
afit
there
soils,
corridors
extensive
and more
etc.)
often
and
which
service
available
during
within
orhow toplanning
concrete
upon
and is
(FPL),
as to
to
also
includes
smallbe
desirable
severethe
sources
is
for
fill
data
these ahas
very
are:
strong
by a40 AFB10, Geometric Design Environment
for
“mixture
chemically
Highway
community
modify
parallel
been
and
need
outweigh
largely
harsh
(AEC)
According
pipe
aX
drainage
or two-way
Do more to
budgeting.
used
nothing OCPLOT
ortheand
invisible
environments
industry. cross
determine
its
to
soil
basins
years. left designâ€
active
goals
caseTransportation
the turn
The
solution to
to
Bechtel,
stiffness
such fluids
and
directly
disadvantages of be
the
National I
lane girder
factors
that
as
question  –
(diagenesis
objectives.
capable under
traveling
inthe persist the
Officials
bridges,
thatleading
Highway
determining
(TWLTL).
parking to ofkey
(connection mixture
handling
influence
public.
be within
lots.In and
with
Traffic
urban
This the
costly
USDA
temperatures
solar
context
the
I.
many
modeling
provide
plant
case
environmental
and
guidelines
collection
elements full
Research than
surveying
their venue.
Forest
loading of
range
years. safety,
communities adjacent
the
impacts
forProblem
errors, the
regarding
translate The
Service,
and
oftomobility,
traditional
impact.
state
allocating basic
form
radiational
muston in
into and
development.
stakeholders.Examples
Statement
all
areas
DOTs qualitative
compounds
The and
transportation
relevant many
beto
evaluation
use
and
cross-section
the cooling.
considered
capacity
where of
local
performance
existing nature
Any offor
residual of AFB10, Geometric Design Environment
characteristics
metamorphism).
(AASHTO)
up
each
the
details,
This
mountainous
contractor
Safety
It
Heger
areas,
work
answered
X is to
transportation
The Limitedgoalthree
span
long-term of
Administration,
essential
Soil
the
needs Policy
vulnerability
deterioration of connected
this
length
Pressure
choice
by to required
field
terrains
industrial
the be
research
strengthening on
arteries.Such
research
of Geometric
approximately
performance
to
eventually
stakeholders
is for
aspeeding
including
Distribution.
often
extended is degree
linear
Trenchless
dynamic
plants
"Why the
isbetween to pay
impacts
of
the
didpavement
identifyof
Design of
loads,
severe
isthe
understand less
one
a newly
larger
they the
U.S., of
of
of
possessing
street
performance
fatigue
innovative
agencies
facilities
width
measures
The
context.
II. on-site
universities
Accomplishing
and
growing
herbicides design
incorporated traffic
cracks,
between
productResearchand assessments
including
cementitious
were
(Biological
ofthat
measures
the
demand.
because
prefabricated
the used.successfully
in design
subsurface
bicycles
this
Problem the West can
This
Oxygen
research include:
itdesign
With
and of
allows
systems make
Virginia
properties a
would
Statement meets
highway
environment.
parked
Demand,
will beit
process.
right-of-way non-
when
include:
water
away used all andof AFF30, Concrete Bridges
its Economy
application
complexity
Highways
2)
equations,
technology
processes
than
entire
winter
also
the
Several
raised
scale
perform
X Itmost
Reinforcement
developed
etc.), Large will
130
which
of system giveft.
conditions,
developed
particular light
medianthe
as
scale and
and are
leads
(directional
materials.
prevalent can by
weight,
highway
they developed,
Streets
communities
suitable tools
anda
project, to
corrosion
all
causing
did
strengthening 3D be
high
a aUniversity,
for
to great
contains
computer
factors matching
Factors
how
portable
TWLTL. drilling
incorporate
improved
environment
and starts
much
rainfall,
how usually
degree
the that
contributing
it Inwill general
tools
gages
can for
once
by
needed
high
aided
some the
be without
to
the of and
early “S”
the
further
influx
have to
uniform
University,
it
Pavement
these
The is
limitations,
Determine
other
from
vehicles;
Dissolved
to
The
Curved in
project
three-dimensional
While contact
needs
use
likelihood
foreign
the
interviewing
determine
research from
steel work ofBucknell
surface
is can one
increased
if
Oxygen, the with
safe
on-site
of
debris
when
will
girder zone be
a site
for
climate
selected water.
temperature
referred
features
Total
identifyto and
successful
to
can
bridges to
both
use
better another,
makes
penetrate
be
agencies
Suspended On
recycled
of
the the
an
haveto the
(alignment University
design
context
variousas
user
a
efficient based
other
a
the
received and
Solids,
reference
vertical
guidelines
vocabulary
curve
underground
and
concentration
influence
research.
funding
I.
of
engineering
traffic
constructed,
been
instances
determine continuous
Research
water
characteristics
X Replacement and
relationships
to
crashes.
introduced from to
thefor
However,
be
astreet. the
lateral
required
designer
the the
utility
of
diverted
Problem
system
and runoff
In particular
scoping
performanceto
practical
ofof 2002,
how
that variability
relationship
chloride that
theto
emplacement
as and
called
superstructureit
would articulate
fromare
and
iswinter
Statement
will
market
limits
concrete or
speeding aggregate
ionsofoften
always
new in of
stakeholder
at
aof
groundwater
Walkthru.
contribute
prefer the
which ramp
elements
the
material
wasand
the
aetc.) case
raisedaandtoin AFS30, Foundations of BridgeEconomy
on
of
hand,
information
complete
the
and
materials
should
sensitive
difference
pavement
solution,
2.
the
organics, the
Maine,
identifying
Evaluate
accommodate
techniques
considerable needed person(s)
however,
community.
cross-section)
be and
can
whichin
metals, is
quantified,
designs, the Iowa
have
residual
structure,problem
cross-section
currently
NCHRP fly
critical who
would
ability and ash
andState
temperature,
bicyclists are
for
short-term
and typically
herbicide
increasing
address
areas
of
employed
and onthe conducting
University,
appurtenances
implementation adjusted
width
FHWA that
highway
rural contains
snow
benefits,
the
many
pH,
byforcreated
roads
research on
stressthe
and
of
rightto
the
of
sources
durability
design
of
associated
some
involvement
In project
this
reinforcing
the
with
construction
seeps,
Jacobus
contributing
have
median
X civil
the
Replacement speed
system
laboratory that
maintenance)
corrosive
realization in of steelwill
carbonate
acceptance
with
infrastructure
Technology,
ability
order to
that each
are
projects
factor of
drainage
be ofto be
the
ground
to the inused.
optimizes
surface,
often mainline
performance-related
has
rapidly
enhance
quantified,
entire to
individual
to
Inc.,
31 rock
hadother
not The
termed
applications,
repair
and
community’s
basins, bridge measurethe
rain
established
percent mixture
resources.
ahighway
significant
opportunities
girders,
mobility
the
improved the
same
water
of all
vision
soil
relative FRP
in
andas a AFD90, Surface Properties - VEnvironment
assessments.
others,
regulated
ice
I.
The
provide
they
basis
managed
breakdown.
concentration
the
of
parallel
and
communities
attention control
Research
way need
project
should
challenges
gap
careful
what under
ofspeed, for
aimpact
between
elements
parking; elements
foroperations.
Problem
is
only
cost/benefit
facilities
indesign the
complete
in
drainage, at
in
statistical
the to the
to
and auspices
harmony
be such
(i.e.,
bridge
research
features
articulate
past crack
adsorb,
15 The
Statement
traffic
utilized streets
analysis.
analysisHOV, as
years. are of
with
tips
construction,
and
their the
arsenic,
uncertainty
control
with
HOT,
deposit, has
the
and
practice
(regression,
best
The goals National
Research been
or
to and and in
Each
design
communities,
specifications
positive
for
simple
critical
factors
decks
prematurely
Drilled
conditions,
1991
fatal
and
life
upon, of ledge
context
by may
have
crashes,
goals.
stiffness.However,
safety, beam,
chloride
that
shaft
but
the
and two It include
may
sensitive
and agingas
local
(PRS).
are
influence
notfoundations
former
is
abuttingand
bioretention
used have
on well
roadway
equally
as a
and
roadway
placed
concentration,
been nominal
a
as
There
components.
13,713 employees
correlation
aofproperty different
general
state
design/solutions
the
widely
important
reference over
are
spray
lives
vegetative are safety
performance maximum
elected
widely
and three
the
accepted,
were
with
for durability
ofguidelines
exceeds
Properly
for
business
system,
the ways
used
Bechtel,
lost
the anda
ofin
It
Timber
barium,
the
Airfield
TOTL), is
recognized,
community.
safety,
engineering
is
Determining
propagating
rehabilitation
release,
the
Analysis
Research proposed
actual
needed
identifying
economic Bridge
boron,
pavement
requires
designers
dilute,
of pavement
to
Problem and what
the to
knowledge
develop
and
the
Variance, effects establish
Initiative
cadmium,
much
aentire
must
crack roughness
well-defined
types surface
the
replacement,
barriers
concentrate, of
etc.)
Statement has Program
of
maximize
at of
an abeen
their
statistics
differentof security
chromium,temperature
is
remediation
accelerated
BLCCA
or and
generally
written
process.
long-term
the
in
consume for
terms
parking useFPL,
lead,
such of
accommodate
visions.The
research
aggregate
and
for
supports
threshold
rightly
laboratory
owners
the
future?"
Obviously,
checklist
are
mercury,
complicates
associated
about
The
AASHTO
behavior;
an
freeway
can
rate.
of the
that
the
representatives,
this
athrough
throughout could
material
scheduled
for
contaminated
developed bridge
speeding-related
transportation
cost
conducting
project
analysis.
be As
design
so,
the
has
ledge
express
useda
systemsof size
be
reductions
before
manual
and
cross
success
value.
in
by the
highway done:
the
foundations
and
stiffness
construction
Investigators
decisions
selenium,
with an
importance
poor
result,meets
toits
them.
resulted
and
may
speed
with a and
casting
However,
field.
bridge
marketed
agency
pilot
sections.
breakdown
design
some
strong
that
research
already
there or
have
in
and
data
etc.
predecessor,
selection
It
of
deicing
crashes. are
and
the
in
other
must
has
of
exceeds
is
will
LRFD
ramp
pavement is
and
While
effort, a
widely
transportation
Work
to the
community.
bridge
where or a be
techniques
constraints
decision
understand
solely
The on
difficult deck
research
is
salts
4D
needed
preference
the
passenger
multimodal
or
used
terminals,
needed
large
Communicating
maintenance.
identify
timber
improper
desperate made
potential
the
AASHTO,
different
slab.
applied
simulation
decision
freeway
neutralized
on-site to by
andon
This
axial
for will
the
onuse
and
to to AFB30, Low-Volume Roads Society
of
Environment
implementation
heavy
choices.
Many
state
be
the
which
makers.
maintenance,
system
Prior
field
identify and
evaluated
Specificationgrading.
characteristics metals,
local
includes
tothe This local
development
experiencehardening
and rural andmajor
documentroad
changes
There as at
roads
freeway
improves
traffic in it agencies
is
ofis
North ions
officials
recommendations
a in were
need
quarried
process
slab 2004 and
entrance
credibility
congestion,
current deck
America that
designed
with
to as andallow have
laterally.
and
of
and 2005
follows:
each
practicesand the moreto
exit
girder
research
maintenance
and
the
changes
contextual
assess
TWLTL.
pavements,
cost
resolving
bridges.
environmental
making
complaints
of
cross
remaining
critical
provide
lateral
highway
considerations.
expectations
developed these
construction
BMS
hydrocarbons.
Objective:
jurisdiction
developed
that
leeway
Carbonate
terminals
state
II.
basis. called
section
unify
Research need
in
inwill
the
process
materials
land
transportation the
loads
speed
afor
Theover
arriving
and
address
(or
during
framework
suitability
examine
However,
about above
of
highway
herbicides
to impact
design
time,
access
aggregate the
the
are
Construction
whereby
address
These
purpose
design
highway
Objective aat
However,
designers,
rural can winter
environment
minimum
use
of
with
an
one
lack
to of
archived
design
of
be
determining
difficulties
particularlead
guidance
in
elements
roads.
by
sources
agency,
these
the
of
the
coalof
ifthere
several
little
overall
it),
to
this
the
resisted.
conditions.
Simulation
owners,process
soil,
communities.It
straight
intersections. thusin
has
gages.and
community.
records,
fly of
runway major
isand
increased
suggests
following
lane of
such
include:
research
thought
blend
aand
drivers
on-site
ash
little
closure
different
the
was
that
asorisin
gaps
and
safety
behaves
elsewhere
infrastructure
barriers
lasting
Where
Toolkit.
need
This
Some
Give
sample,
cost
security
primarily
environmental
taxiway. to hazards.
impact
proposal
the
of rock
have CIFE
each as
that
adjust has
apparent
test,
bridge
studied
Airfield simple
bearing shown
construction
prohibit
on
(Centertheir
seeks
suggested
and
alternative beam,
those
assessments.
factors through
pavement tostrata
for
speed
performance
quantify that
many critical
define
various
must is with
Integrated this
and
are
is designers
their
not
leaching
be maximum
value
difficult.
and
Such
roughness volumeto
issues
present,
and develop
develop
considereda tests can
Facility
the from
is
practical
stakeholders.
has
maintenance
Data
that
soil been
describing
12-foot
amendments, guidance
essentially costs
lanes the onand
with how
unchanged
subsurface reduced
8- toto effectively
10-foot since it In
inside
in
time,
given
is
curved
grading
regions
However,technology.
·individual
Recent
to
enhancing
The
Identify
moment
vary
the
adopting
affecting
Rockfall
Engineering)
Transitioning
tools
III.
thresholds
potential
characteristics.
straightforward
checklist
(References
together
much
serve
The
was
serviceable
and
identifying
drainage
establish
anticipatedtobeams.
objectives
widely
bestfor
Researchmore
all
project
formalized
ofhigh
and the
the
minimum
experimentation
the
traditional
being
practices aof
aggregate
public
and
drilled
mitigation
should
with at
difference
the
usesystems,
research
traffic
that The
different
design
are
at
nation.The
of is
identification
Objective:
what
1shoulders
than
transportation
achieves
life 7). It
in
of aaddition
needs
the
ashafts
Stanford
high-speed is
simply
pavementcover
The
the
orenvironmental
concept
involvement
the
of to:
for
systems
volume
in
not
“ride
sizes
of
processes
facilities.a
(1)
middle
probabilistic
FRP cost
of
featuring
program
heavy examines
recommended
ages,
ramps
implementing update
decks.
development
are
because
all
release
level
1940s.
ofof
agencies
(and
University
rural
suggested andcapable
have
to
of
pertinent
information.
quality”
modes of of
The
soil
loadings.
using
likewise,
and
of has
and the
AASHTO
highways
of
drop
that
different
the
been
articulation
convert
wet these
along
not
the
function
ponds
that
the
issue.
excellence.
Unfortunately, current
and
back-in
span.
the
of
used
bridge Aof
the in
environment,
and
impact.
the
structures,
angle
would
some
III.
techniques
curved
materials
may
traditionally
progress
current outside
microorganisms,
resources
Research
Unfortunately,
practices
The showparking
use
areas
detailingconcreteof
version or culverts,
measurement
this
will
similar
common metal
they
as
Objective
minerals
been
future
is of
the
such cover
an
includes
include
beams havetype
pipes,
alternative
complexities.
viewed
projects
OCPLOT
utility
to or
many
that is
crops,
asfor (metallurgy),
ideal,
and
higher
stakeholder
recycled and
an
as
service
bridge bridge
and
in a etc.there
stilling
to
defensible
alternate
DOS composite LCCA
head-in
classified
materials
supporting
transportation format.
industry
behaves is to
rather
use
has
National
supporting
service
this
through
of
The
from
in
new
security
elements
lack
Rough
same
The
process
few arid
uncertain of
always
tests
of
project
studiesthan
new
software
community
proposed
a oralong Service
small
five-lane
pavements
facilitycan semi-arid
issues
knowledge be
nature
to being
materials.
provided
very roadways
andrural
context.
project
developed
the
or
exhibits
be
involve with fixed
Level
largeits
design
of
environment
corridor.
briefly on simplified
towns
areas
the later
simple,
reduce has
the
efficient
more or
Criteria
loads. in
(TWLTL)
outlinedas
future
Mostof constant.
Europe
versions,
and
three
the
true
thanthe the
butand of
will means
for
Lateral
into the
and
significant
to
country
pavement
fatigue
available
a as most
accurate a From
effectiveload
also
the
follows:non-
lifeby
the
level
limited
Determine
Identify
(personnel,
basins
angle
statistical
“farm
The
identification
curved
where
system
funding
This
has
agencies
as of
form corrosion
research
parking.
to
proposed and
steel market”
appropriate)
encountered
continuous consisting
allocation
suchwillwhatconfirm
resources
analysis and
beams Current
research
continue
as
for aprotection
findings
types
orto
conflict
of is
to the
the andof
research
establish
collector will
unrecognized
opportunities.
significant
long-range
any meet
loads to on
threeplants
accurate
time) afforded
how
result
resolution
run routes
needed are
in
integral
as
technology
planning,
applied the crack
inRhodebest
a
byon
after to
aInterstate
which
with deterministic
capacity
USA
appropriate
repair
questions.
generate
surface
of
design
use theof
Dimensionally
qualitative for
suburban/urban
objectives:
traversable
this the
work the
schemes.can
more
aircraft,
guidance
the help
candesign
andBy be
(e.g., than
of
offer
petrography
significant
temperatureresources perspective,
National
answeringIt
increase
based,
consideration of
substantial
AutoCad
deals 30
environment
raised)
may aprevailing
impactcomplex
substantial
could
of Highway
years,
cheaper
with
with and
these (for
median.
operational
all the the
because
toand
result 3D is
tests
design
design critical
bridge
savings
to System
their
adrive
questions,
the
involved indesign
Two ofafor
exist.
accept
human,
for
valuespoor
and use
in
the
deviations
suited
·parts
Island
guide
the
chloride
Research
system
would
their
along
modeling)
challenge.
II.
system,
environmental
which
components.
most
performance
To
present
hurdle prevent
implementation
concrete
Research
Correlate
concerns
meeting
The
awildlife
limitedold
to
initiation-propagation
Simultaneouslysedimentation
is
bridges
that
designers.
which
large
comprehensive
winter which
can
place
railways
and
examining
program fromand
re-colonize
provides
use
concentration
should
about
repair
maintenance andbeform It
deck
Increasing
field
stormwater
concretes
BMPs
and the
these
with
should
restrains Several
requirements
of
carried
emphasis
diameter predates
Objective:Primavera
gage
ecosystem. is
address
non-traversable
were
alternative,
picture
these
the
basins
tradeoffs
guidance
substandard
the
does
planning, ideals
mechanisms.
relevant
pavementsramp:
in
hardened.
and out also
the
is
and
transition
soil-stiffness
management
strategies,cast
Coal aof
FHWAs
projects
the
superior
their of
andthe
areas.between
while
the
Windows
use
concept
largely
without
(forassure
with
however
the
to
flyash
were
and/or
identify long-term
individually,
This
following
application highway
in
aggregate,
of ramp
scheduling),
safety moment
median
portland
security
which caused
bike
is
support
particular
parties.
for
behavior
or
rapid
The inphysical
mechanisms
Determine combination,
construction,
designed
warrants
partnerships,
Florida,
optimizing
tools
proper
II. Research
environment; for and costs,
construction
synthesis
replacement
lane width of
for
on modeif
and
Pennsylvania,
rapid the
the plant
whenandincrease
dimensions
these
of would
wetlands
Objective: but
corrosion
parking
maintenance
infrequent
use
evaluation
(2) appropriate will not
materials.
succession
(Get
bicycles
may
update bethe require
effect
in, with
directly
valuable
width.
heavy
identify
Colorado and (uniform,
Get
and
should
materials
of how
freeway
The
aggregate
terminals,
put stopping
out,
thederived
to to
operations
loading,
and thebe Stay
role
at serve
most of
directional
development,
includes
unknown
questions:
resorting
allocation
resistance.
by
to
an
could the
apply
designs
furtherimportant
measurements
mandates.
cement,
situation
groundwater
distance,
the
The
from
galvanic
operations
methodologies
Identify
out!
·well
pavement
even
highway
lead
competing
project
tables
policy),
researchers,
activities.medians
accommodatedthen
municipal/regional
recently
are
work the
the
to
4D-CAD
sand,
of of
reduce
action,
drilling
function
to
only
Nebraska
the
was
and
and
live
costly environmental
limited
Drilled
goal.
will to
stone,
excessive
needs loads
industry.
inneed
bridge
contamination
the
designed
charts.
localized
safety.
(adaptive
structural-mixture
markingthe
practitioners
Development bridge
seeing
on
in
of
refined
shafts congested
addressing
laboratory
additional and
life
diagrams
rural of
planning
have
due
concrete
resources
to
will
use
Highway of are
The
multiple
community
those of
to
methods.
travel
water.
beand
highways
demonstrated the
pitting,
management)
the in
traffic
larger
to
long-term
stiffness
done
emerge.
ofhas built
urban
analysis,
component
particularly deal
distance
Those
been
chemicals,
pavement,
property
policy
recent
research
organizations in
modes.
stress
designers with
has
loads
and 2input
and
Since
Since are
the
hand.
quality
whether
and
areas.
design,
dead
with
AASHTO's
A output
materials,
the 1930s,
performance
succinct
results
and
still There
these
suited
construction
time
the must
This
loads freeway
construction,
due
primary mix isbe
stages
problem
that
designers
critical
to
Policy
definitionof also
planning
to developed
are
design or in
onissues.
conditions
these
the
mix a is need
highway,
Windows
applied the
and
parameters,
have
systems
Geometric
of issues
indirectioncontext
ingredients. where toand
used move
inadvertent
maintenance
after on format.each
simplified
scour,
isDesign
(Collier aOnly
needs
caused away
concrete
and side
et.the
to al.
ofby
Search Term Search Term Search Term Sust. Topic Sust. Topic Sust. Topic
Health/Environ
mental
Safety Damage
Safety
Safety
Safety
Efficiency

Intragenerationa Access
l Equity
Efficiency
Safety Efficiency
Efficiency Affordability
Safety

Environment Economy Efficiency Safety Emissions and


Waste
Economy

Efficiency

Safety Efficiency
Non-renewable
Resources
Economy Efficiency
Efficiency
Efficiency
Access Safety Intragenerationa
Efficiency l Equity
Safety
Emissions and
Waste
Safety
Efficiency Access
Safety
Efficiency Affordability
Efficiency
Efficiency Access
Equity Environment Economy

Access
Access
Safety Access Efficiency
Society Environment Health/Environ Emissions and Social Cost
Society Environment mental Damage
Emissions and Waste
Waste

Economy Safety Efficiency Social Cost


Access Safety Efficiency
Access Safety Efficiency
Access Safety
Safety Access
Safety
Economy Safety Social Cost

Emissions and Energy Efficiency


Waste

Safety
Efficiency Emissions and
Access Waste
Safety
Safety Access
Safety
Safety

Health/Environ Noise
mental
Safety Damage
Access Affordability Health/Environ
Health/Environ Emissions and mental Damage
Efficiency
mental Damage Waste
Safety Efficiency
Safety
Safety Efficiency
Energy Efficiency Intragenerationa
Emissions and Efficiency lSocial
EquityCost
Waste
Health/Environ Access Intergenerationa
Society Environment mental Damage
Emissions and Energy lSocial
EquityCost
Waste
Access Efficiency Emissions and
Emissions and Health/Environ Waste
Waste
Emissions and mental Damage
Non-renewable Energy
Economy Waste
Energy Resources
Emissions and Non-renewable
Energy Waste
Emissions and Resources
Standards
Energy Waste
Emissions and
Economic Emissions and Waste
Energy
Development Waste
Emissions and Energy
Waste
Emissions and Health/Environ
Waste
Emissions and mental Damage
Renewable
Waste
Efficiency Resources
Safety
Emissions and Standards
Waste
Emissions and Efficiency
Waste
Emissions and Energy
Waste
Energy Emissions and
Safety Waste
Noise
Safety
Efficiency
Health/Environ Safety Efficiency
mental
Access Damage Efficiency
Access Land Use
Efficiency Affordability
Access Safety Efficiency
Access Efficiency
Intragenerationa Emissions and
lIntragenerationa
Equity Waste
Safety Access
Environment lSafety
Equity Access
Safety
Safety
Safety
Intragenerationa Social Cost Efficiency
lIntragenerationa
Equity Social Cost Efficiency
lSocial
EquityCost Efficiency
Social Cost Efficiency
Efficiency Social Cost

Intragenerationa
lEfficiency
Equity

Safety Health/Environ Efficiency


Economy Emissions and mental
Safety Damage
Economy Waste
Efficiency Safety

Efficiency Employment Affordability


Efficiency Employment
Safety
Safety Efficiency

Efficiency

Access

Recycling

Safety Access
Safety
Access
Safety

Equity Environment Access Intragenerationa Emissions and


Efficiency lEnergy
Equity Waste
Safety
Access
Efficiency
Intragenerationa
lAccess
Equity Efficiency
Intragenerationa Health/Environ Safety
l Equity mental Damage
Efficiency

Affordability Land Use


Safety Intragenerationa
Efficiency l Equity

Safety
Safety
Efficiency Access Emissions and
Efficiency Safety Waste
Efficiency
Efficiency

Safety
Environment Access Intragenerationa
Access lIntragenerationa
Equity
Emissions and lHealth/Environ
Equity Non-renewable
Waste
Noise mental
Emissions and Resources
Damage
Safety Waste

Efficiency Emissions and Access


Safety Waste
Safety
Efficiency Health/Environ
Safety mental Damage
Employment
Economic Efficiency Access Health/Environ
Development Efficiency Access mental Damage
Access Efficiency
Efficiency
Energy Social Cost Efficiency
Renewable Efficiency Emissions and
Resources
Energy Affordability Waste
Energy Social Cost
Energy

Intragenerationa Social Cost Health/Environ


lSocial
EquityCost Safety mental Damage
Efficiency
Society Environment Health/Environ Intragenerationa Social Cost
mental
StandardsDamage lHealth/Environ
Equity
Access mental Damage
Intragenerationa
Access lLand
Equity
Use
Efficiency Social Cost
Intragenerationa
l Equity
Efficiency Affordability
Safety Access Health/Environ
Social Cost Efficiency mental Damage
Intragenerationa
Efficiency l Equity
Emissions and
Waste
Safety
Safety

Equity Economic Standards


Development Safety Access
Safety Intragenerationa
Intragenerationa l Equity
lSafety
Equity
Safety

Efficiency Intragenerationa
Efficiency l Equity
Efficiency

Land Use Health/Environ Access


Land Use mental Damage Efficiency
Health/Environ
Access mental Damage
Efficiency
Intragenerationa Efficiency
lIntragenerationa
Equity Efficiency
lIntragenerationa
Equity
Economic lEfficiency
Equity Emissions and
Development
Economic Health/Environ Waste
Access Efficiency
Development mental Damage
Health/Environ Emissions and Efficiency
mental Damage Waste
Efficiency Intragenerationa Safety
Health/Environ lEfficiency
Equity
mental Damage
Health/Environ Emissions and
mental
Safety Damage Waste
Health/Environ
Safety mental Damage
Access Land Use
Efficiency Safety
Efficiency Safety
Access
Efficiency Intragenerationa Health/Environ
Equity Environment Standards lIntragenerationa
Equity mental Damage
Health/Environ
Energy lEmissions
Equity and mental
Access Damage
Access Waste
Efficiency Land Use
Intragenerationa Access
lSocial
EquityCost Health/Environ
mental Damage
Efficiency Employment
Affordability Safety Health/Environ
Access Safety mental Damage
Efficiency
Safety
Emissions and Safety
Waste
Safety
Safety
Intragenerationa Health/Environ Efficiency
lEfficiency
Equity mental Damage Employment
Intragenerationa
Intragenerationa lEfficiency
Equity
lAccess
Equity Efficiency
Efficiency
Intragenerationa Efficiency Social Cost
lEfficiency
Equity Access
Efficiency Social Cost
Health/Environ
mental Damage Intragenerationa
Efficiency
Access lSafety
Equity Intragenerationa
Safety Efficiency l Equity
Safety
Safety
Efficiency Access Health/Environ
Efficiency Access mental
Land Use Damage

Emissions and
Waste
Emissions and
Waste
Standards
Safety Noise
Non-renewable Emissions and
Resources Waste
Efficiency Emissions and
Efficiency Waste
Health/Environ
mental Damage

Intragenerationa Efficiency Access


l Equity
Safety Energy Efficiency
Safety Health/Environ Efficiency
Standards mental Damage
Health/Environ
Efficiency mental
Safety Damage
Safety

Intragenerationa Health/Environ Land Use


l Equity and mental
Emissions Damage
Efficiency
Waste
Health/Environ
mental Damage
Intragenerationa
lIntragenerationa
Equity
lEfficiency
Equity Recycling Safety
Economy Emissions and Efficiency
Waste
Safety Efficiency
Access Safety
Safety Access
Efficiency Affordability
Health/Environ Emissions and
mental Damage Waste
Efficiency
Efficiency
Efficiency
Efficiency
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety

Safety Efficiency
Health/Environ Land Use
mental Damage
Primary Category Secondary Category TRB Subject TRB Subject
Programming Project Development Data and Planning and
Programming Project Development Information
Highways Forecasting
Design
Technology
Programming Highways Planning and
Programming Operations Highways Forecasting
Design
Programming Operations Highways Design
Systems Planning Programming Public Planning and
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Administration and Forecasting
Maintenance and
Programming Project Development Management
Public Preservation
Data and
Operations Transportation
Highways Information
Pipelines
Technology
Programming Operations Public Railroads
Operations Transportation
Public Passenger
Project Development Transportation
Administration and Transportation
Transportation
Construction Maintenance Management
Highways (General)
Pipelines
Maintenance Construction Highways Pipelines
Construction Maintenance Highways Pipelines
Operations Maintenance Highways Pipelines
Construction Maintenance Highways Pipelines
Maintenance Construction Highways Pipelines
Construction Maintenance Highways Pipelines
Maintenance Construction Highways Pipelines
Construction Highways Pipelines
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Maintenance Construction Highways Maintenance and
Construction Construction Preservation
Design
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Systems Planning Highways Maintenance and
Maintenance Construction Preservation
Design
Maintenance Highways History
Programming Project Development Highways Administration and
Construction Maintenance Highways Management
Construction
Systems Planning Programming Pedestrians and Data and
Maintenance Construction Bicyclists
Pedestrians and Information
Maintenance and
Bicyclists Technology
Preservation
Programming Operations Highways Pedestrians and
Construction Maintenance Highways Bicyclists
Materials
Construction Maintenance Highways Materials
Operations Programming Motor Carriers Research
Systems Planning Programming Highways Planning and
Maintenance Operations Highways Forecasting
Maintenance and
Systems Planning Programming Public Preservation
Finance
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Public Planning and
Programming Transportation
Public Forecasting
Data and
Systems Planning Operations Transportation
Operations and Information
Planning and
Traffic Technology
Forecasting
Systems Planning Programming Motor Carriers Data and
Management Information and
Systems Planning Operations Pedestrians and Administration
Bicyclists Technology
Management
Systems Planning Programming Pedestrians and Data and
Bicyclists Information
Technology
Systems Planning Programming Pedestrians and Design
Systems Planning Programming Bicyclists
Construction Design
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Construction Operations Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Maintenance Highways Construction
Systems Planning Programming Pedestrians and Public
Systems Planning Programming Bicyclists
Pedestrians and Transportation
Maintenance and
Systems Planning Programming Bicyclists
Pedestrians and Preservation
Public
Maintenance Operations Bicyclists
Pedestrians and Transportation
Maintenance and
Systems Planning Programming Bicyclists
Highways Preservation
Pedestrians and
Operations Motor Carriers Bicyclists
Freight
Construction Maintenance Highways Transportation
Design
Systems Planning Programming Data and Planning and
Systems Planning Programming Information
Public Forecasting
Security and
Technology
Transportation Emergencies
Programming Highways Administration and
Programming Maintenance Highways Management
Design
Construction Project Development Highways Design
Systems Planning Programming Highways Design
Operations Programming Highways Design
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Construction Operations Highways Design
Operations Highways Research
Systems Planning Programming Aviation Safety and Human
Construction Maintenance Highways Factors
Geotechnology
Systems Planning Programming Public
Programming Construction Transportation
Highways Design
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Operations Programming Railroads Safety and Human
Programming Operations Railroads Factors
Safety and Human
Programming Operations Highways Factors
Pedestrians and
Operations Highways Bicyclists
Public
Systems Planning Programming Public Transportation
Energy
Systems Planning Project Development Transportation
Highways Energy
Systems Planning Highways Energy
Systems Planning Programming Public Energy
Programming Operations Transportation
Aviation Highways
Systems Planning Programming Transportation Energy
Systems Planning Programming (General)
Highways Energy
Programming Transportation Energy
Systems Planning Operations (General)
Highways Energy
Systems Planning Highways Freight
Systems Planning Highways Transportation
Transportation
Programming Operations Aviation (General)
Energy
Systems Planning Operations Aviation Railroads
Operations Maintenance Highways Transportation
Systems Planning Programming Public (General)
Energy
Transportation
Systems Planning Programming Energy
Systems Planning Energy
Systems Planning Programming Energy
Operations Construction Aviation Highways
Programming Operations Motor Carriers Research
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Systems Planning Security and Transportation
Programming Operations Emergencies
Public (General)
Data and
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Public Information
Planning and
Transportation Technology
Forecasting
Project Development Public Administration and
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Pedestrians and Management
Public
Systems Planning Programming Bicyclists
Pedestrians and Transportation
Public
Programming Bicyclists
Pedestrians and Transportation
Safety and Human
Programming Project Development Bicyclists
Pedestrians and Factors
Public
Systems Planning Operations Bicyclists
Pedestrians and Transportation
Data and
Programming Operations Bicyclists and
Pedestrians Information
Data and
Bicyclists Technology
Information
Systems Planning Pedestrians and Data and
Bicyclists Technology
Information
Systems Planning Programming Pedestrians and Safety and Human
Bicyclists Technology
Factors
Programming Transportation Finance
Programming (General)
Highways Freight
Programming Operations and Transportation
Transportation
Programming Traffic
Highways (General)
Operations and
Management Traffic
Systems Planning Programming Operations and Transportation
Traffic Management
(General)
Maintenance Construction Bridges and other
Management structures
Programming Highways Public
Programming Operations Highways Transportation
Marine
Construction Maintenance Highways Transportation
Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Operations Highways Maintenance and
Maintenance Highways Preservation
Maintenance and
Maintenance Highways Preservation
Maintenance and
Construction Maintenance Highways Preservation
Design
Programming Highways Administration and
Operations Aviation Management
Economics
Operations Aviation Highways
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Programming Systems Planning Highways Public
Construction Maintenance Highways Transportation
Design
Systems Planning Programming Public Data and
Construction Maintenance Transportation
Highways Information
Design
Technology
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Systems Planning Programming Highways Public
Systems Planning Programming Highways Transportation
Data and
Systems Planning Programming Highways Information
Data and
Technology
Information
Programming Highways Pedestrians and
Technology
Bicyclists
Programming Operations Pedestrians and Design
Programming Project Development Bicyclists
Highways Data and
Programming Operations Highways Information
Design
Technology
Operations Construction Highways Design
Systems Planning Highways Public
Systems Planning Public Transportation
Research
Programming Operations Transportation
Aviation Highways
Programming Pedestrians and Public
Systems Planning Operations Bicyclists
Aviation Transportation
Administration and
Project Development Aviation Management
Planning and
Systems Planning Programming Aviation Forecasting
Operations and
Systems Planning Programming Highways Traffic
Pedestrians and
Management
Bicyclists
Programming Operations Highways Research
Programming Operations Public Data and
Operations Transportation
Highways Information
Public
Technology
Transportation
Systems Planning Operations Highways Operations and
Programming Operations Highways Traffic
Railroads
Management
Programming Project Development Highways Operations and
Systems Planning Programming Highways Traffic
Motor Carriers
Management
Programming Operations Highways Pedestrians and
Programming Operations Aviation Bicyclists
Data and
Programming Maintenance Highways Information
Railroads
Technology
Programming Operations Pipelines Freight
Operations Programming Highways Transportation
Freight
Systems Planning Highways Transportation
Marine
Programming Administration and Transportation
Research
Systems Planning Programming Management
Highways Data and
Systems Planning Programming Highways Information
Data and
Technology
Information
Programming Operations Pedestrians and Operations and
Bicyclists Technology
Traffic
Systems Planning Programming Public Planning and
Transportation Management
Forecasting
Systems Planning Operations Public Society
Operations Transportation
Aviation Highways
Operations Aviation Environment
Programming Administration and Operations and
Maintenance Construction Management
Highways Traffic
Construction
Management
Maintenance Construction Highways Design
Programming Construction Highways Pipelines
Programming Railroads Research
Programming Highways Research
Programming Highways Operations and
Programming Systems Planning Highways Traffic
Data and
Management
Information
Systems Planning Programming Highways Safety and Human
Technology
Factors
Systems Planning Programming Public Operations and
Programming Transportation
Public Traffic
Passenger
Transportation Management
Transportation
Systems Planning Programming Public Operations and
Programming Transportation
Public Traffic
Transportation Management
Programming Operations Highways Public
Transportation
Systems Planning Operations Freight Economics
Systems Planning Operations Transportation
Highways Motor Carriers
Programming Highways Society
Programming Highways Vehicles and
Construction Operations Highways Equipment
Construction
Systems Planning Highways Public
Programming Operations Highways Transportation
Administration and
Systems Planning Administration and Management
Data and
Systems Planning Programming Management
Public Information
Administration and
Transportation Technology
Management
Systems Planning Programming Highways Planning and
Systems Planning Highways Forecasting
Public
Systems Planning Programming Highways Transportation
Administration and
Systems Planning Programming Planning and Management
Safety and Human
Programming Project Development Forecasting
Highways Factors
Public
Programming Highways Transportation
Public
Programming Operations Highways Transportation
Pedestrians and
Programming Highways Bicyclists
Public
Systems Planning Aviation Transportation
Highways
Systems Planning Programming Public Data and
Operations Programming Transportation
Highways Information
Freight
Technology
Transportation
Systems Planning Operations Data and Freight
Programming Information
Highways Transportation
Public
Technology Transportation
Systems Planning Programming Highways Public
Systems Planning Aviation Transportation
Freight
Maintenance Operations Highways Transportation
Construction
Systems Planning Highways Public
Programming Operations Highways Transportation
Pedestrians and
Programming Operations Highways Bicyclists
Pedestrians and
Project Development Highways Bicyclists
Public
Programming Operations Highways Transportation
Pedestrians and
Programming Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Freight
Systems Planning Bicyclists
Highways Transportation
Public
Programming Project Development Highways Transportation
Administration and
Systems Planning Programming Highways Management
Planning and
Programming Project Development Highways Forecasting
Data and
Construction Programming Highways Information
Data and
Technology
Information
Operations Programming Highways Freight
Technology
Transportation
Systems Planning Highways Freight
Systems Planning Programming Pedestrians and Transportation
Public
Systems Planning Programming Bicyclists
Highways Transportation
Planning and
Systems Planning Highways Forecasting
Pedestrians and
Construction Maintenance Highways Bicyclists
Materials
Programming Project Development Highways Planning and
Maintenance Construction Highways Forecasting
Planning and
Programming Public Forecasting
Security and
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Highways Emergencies
Freight
Systems Planning Programming Public Transportation
Administration and
Transportation Management
Programming Operations Marine Data and
Programming Transportation
Highways Information
Safety and Human
Technology
Factors
Operations Construction Marine Construction
Operations Maintenance Transportation
Marine Operations and
Systems Planning Transportation
Highways Traffic
Operations and
Management
Traffic and
Operations Programming Highways Security
Management
Emergencies
Systems Planning Programming Highways Pedestrians and
Systems Planning Programming Highways Bicyclists
Motor Carriers
Systems Planning Programming Highways Motor Carriers
Systems Planning Programming Highways Pedestrians and
Programming Project Development Public Bicyclists
Administration and
Systems Planning Operations Transportation
Public Management
Administration and
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Public Management
Administration and
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Public Management
Administration and
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Highways Management
Freight
Programming Pedestrians and Transportation
Public
Programming Bicyclists
Public Transportation
Administration and
Systems Planning Transportation
Highways Management
Design
Systems Planning Operations Highways Operations and
Programming Operations Highways Traffic
Design
Management
Systems Planning Programming Pedestrians and Design
Systems Planning Operations Bicyclists
Highways Administration and
Programming Operations Highways Management
Operations and
Construction Operations Public Traffic
Construction
Transportation Management
Programming Operations Public Construction
Programming Transportation
Highways Society
Systems Planning Programming Highways Public
Systems Planning Programming Highways Transportation
Pedestrians and
Programming Operations Highways Bicyclists
Administration and
Programming Operations Highways Management
Administration and
Programming Project Development Highways Management
Railroads
Systems Planning Programming Highways Operations and
Programming Highways Traffic
Operations and
Management
Traffic
Construction Operations Highways Construction
Management
Programming Project Development Public Planning and
Systems Planning Programming Transportation
Highways Forecasting
Pedestrians and
Programming Operations Highways Bicyclists
Operations and
Construction Operations Pedestrians and Traffic
Railroads
Bicyclists Management
Programming Operations Highways Design
Programming Highways Operations and
Systems Planning Programming Highways Traffic
Public
Management
Transportation
Systems Planning Programming Highways Operations and
Operations Programming Aviation Traffic
Terminals and
Management
Facilities
Programming Operations Aviation Terminals and
Programming Project Development Aviation Facilities
Planning and
Systems Planning Programming Aviation Forecasting
Planning and
Construction Maintenance Highways Forecasting
Construction
Construction Maintenance Construction Bridges and other
Construction Maintenance Highways structures
Construction
Construction Operations Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Maintenance Construction Highways Construction
Operations Programming Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Construction Operations Highways Construction
Project Development Programming Highways Public
Systems Planning Project Development Highways Transportation
Public
Maintenance Programming Highways Transportation
Maintenance and
Maintenance Operations Highways Preservation
Maintenance and
Construction Operations Highways Preservation
Construction
Maintenance Construction Highways Maintenance and
Maintenance Operations Highways Preservation
Maintenance and
Construction Maintenance Highways Preservation
Maintenance and
Programming Project Development Highways Preservation
Public
Construction Operations Highways Transportation
Construction
Maintenance Programming Highways Construction
Project Development Programming Highways Public
Project Development Programming Highways Transportation
Public
Construction Maintenance Highways Transportation
Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Systems Planning Programming Highways Construction
Programming Operations Highways Pedestrians and
Construction Maintenance Highways Bicyclists
Construction
Construction Operations Highways Construction
Construction Programming Highways Construction
Construction Highways Design
Maintenance Highways Construction
Maintenance Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
Programming Operations Highways Design
Construction Operations Highways Construction
Construction Operations Highways Construction
Construction Operations Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Design
Construction Highways Construction
Construction Highways Construction
Construction Maintenance Aviation Construction
Construction Maintenance Highways Construction
TRB Subject TRB Subject TRB Subject TRB Subject TRB Subject
Society Transportation Policy
Safety and Human (General)
Factors
Safety and Human Education and Passenger
Factors
Safety and Human Training
Bridges and other Transportation
Factors
Planning and structures
Safety and Human
Forecasting
Transportation Factors
Passenger Policy
(General)
Bridges and other Transportation
structures
Data and Design
Information
Administration and Planning and Policy
Technology
Management Forecasting
Finance
Finance Economics
Construction Design Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Bridges and other
Pavements Geotechnology structures
Materials Bridges and other
Materials structures
Research Bridges and other
Geotechnology Bridges and other structures
Planning and structures
Energy Environment
Forecasting
Maintenance and Materials Bridges and other
Preservation
Environment structures
Construction Design Finance
Materials Pavements
Planning and Policy
Forecasting
Pavements Policy
Data and Safety and Human Policy
Information
Geotechnology Factors
Technology
Geotechnology
Education and
Training
Economics Policy
Safety and Human
Factors
Policy
Economics Policy
Planning and
Forecasting
Transportation Policy
(General)
Operations and Planning and Policy
Traffic
Policy Forecasting
Management
Planning and
Forecasting
Planning and
Forecasting
Planning and
Forecasting
Design Materials
Education and
Training
Materials

Planning and
Forecasting
Planning and
Forecasting
Planning and Safety and Human
Forecasting
Safety and Human Factors
Factors
Public Safety and Human
Transportation
Vehicles and Factors
Equipment
Materials Bridges and other
Vehicles and structures
Energy Environment
Equipment
Data and
Information
Safety and Human
Technology
Factors
Operations and
Traffic
Management
Operations and Safety and Human
Traffic
Operations and Factors and
Planning
Management
Traffic Forecasting
Operations and
Management
Traffic
Safety and Human
Management
Factors
Society Environment
Bridges and other
structures
Operations and Policy
Traffic
Pavements Research
Management

Design Society Environment


Energy

Environment
Environment

Energy Environment

Environment

Energy
Energy
Environment
History Energy Environment
Energy
Environment
Public Construction Pavements
Transportation
Safety and Human Education and Passenger
Factors
Materials Training
Research Transportation
Bridges and other
Policy Energy structures
Environment
Planning and Transportation
Forecasting
Transportation (General)
Policy
(General)
Planning and Finance Policy
Forecasting
Planning and
Forecasting
Policy
Education and Policy
Training
Safety and Human
Factors
Operations and Planning and
Traffic
Operations and Forecasting
Planning and Safety and Human
Management
Traffic Forecasting Factors
Safety and Human
Management
Factors
Law
Economics Policy
Finance Economics Policy
Finance Economics Policy
Finance Economics Policy
Finance Economics Policy

Planning and Society


Forecasting
Data and Freight Planning and Terminals and Economics
Information
Design Transportation
Materials Forecasting
Pavements Facilities
Technology
Pavements Geotechnology
Operations and Finance
Traffic
Operations and Planning and Research Finance
Management
Traffic Forecasting
Operations and Education and Finance
Management
Traffic Training
Bridges and other
Management
structures
Planning and Research Economics
Forecasting
Design Safety and Human Terminals and
Materials Factors
Pavements Facilities
Bridges and other
Design Research structures
Bridges and other
Materials Pavements structures
Geotechnology
Administration and Planning and
Management
Materials Forecasting
Pavements Research
Operations and Planning and Research Terminals and Finance
Traffic
Bridges and other Forecasting Facilities
Management
structures
Pavements Research
Research Vehicles and
Equipment

Design Safety and Human


Factors
Safety and Human
Factors
Operations and Safety and Human Education and
Traffic
Operations and Factors
Planning and Training
Research
Management
Traffic Forecasting
Management
Planning and Research
Forecasting
Energy
Pavements Safety and Human
Planning and Factors
Education and
Forecasting
Planning and Training
Terminals and Policy
Forecasting
Society Facilities
Economics
Planning and Passenger Terminals and Economics
Forecasting
Public Transportation
Planning and Facilities
Terminals and
Transportation
Safety and Human Forecasting
Economics Facilities
Policy
Factors
Security and Finance
Emergencies
Data and Education and Economics
Information
Safety and Human Training
Society Vehicles and
Technology
Factors Equipment
Operations and Safety and Human
Traffic
Planning and Factors
Vehicles and
Management
Forecasting Equipment
Public Research Vehicles and Finance
Transportation
Design Operations and Equipment
Safety and Human
Planning and Traffic
Terminals and Factors
Forecasting Management
Facilities
Freight
Transportation
Planning and Security and Terminals and
Forecasting
Planning and Emergencies
Terminals and Facilities
Economics
Forecasting
Freight Facilities
Planning and Terminals and
Transportation
Education and Forecasting
Society Facilities
Finance
Training
Operations and Safety and Human
Traffic
Operations and Factors
Safety and Human Vehicles and
Management
Traffic Factors Equipment
Research Safety and Human
Management Factors
Passenger
Transportation
Administration and Environment
Management
Planning and Safety and Human
Forecasting
Design Factors
Research Bridges and other
Research Geotechnology structures
Bridges and other
Construction Design structures
Passenger
Transportation
Safety and Human
Factors
Safety and Human
Factors
Freight
Transportation
Education and Economics
Training
Terminals and Economics Environment
Facilities
Terminals and
Facilities
Planning and Finance Energy
Forecasting
Energy
Vehicles and Energy
Equipment
Vehicles and Economics Environment
Equipment
Energy
Design Geotechnology History
Planning and Finance
Forecasting
Safety and Human Society Finance
Factors
Planning and Society
Forecasting
Planning and Society Environment
Forecasting
Economics
Planning and Economics
Forecasting
Operations and Planning and Finance
Traffic
Security and Forecasting
Education and Society
Management
Emergencies Training
Administration and
Management
Administration and Economics
Management
Operations and Safety and Human Education and
Traffic
Planning and Factors
Finance Training
Management
Forecasting
Public Administration and Education and
Transportation Management Training
Safety and Human Security and
Factors
Operations and Emergencies
Safety and Human Security and
Traffic
Administration and Factors
Economics Emergencies
Management
Management
Administration and
Management
Planning and Terminals and
Forecasting
Design Facilities
Planning and History
Economics Forecasting
Environment
Railroads Operations and Safety and Human Terminals and
Design Traffic
Safety and Human Factors Facilities
Management
Factors
Construction Design Planning and
Design Planning and Forecasting
Safety and Human
Operations and Forecasting
Safety and Human Factors
Traffic Factors
Administration and Design Planning and
Management
Management Forecasting
Economics
Economics
Freight Economics
Transportation
Pavements Finance

Planning and Policy


Forecasting
Terminals and Finance
Facilities
Public Planning and Safety and Human
Transportation
Pavements Forecasting Factors
Society Transportation Economics
Research (General)
Society Economics
Society Law Environment
Planning and
Forecasting
Planning and Terminals and Economics
Forecasting Facilities
Freight Society Terminals and Environment
Transportation
Security and Finance Facilities
Emergencies
Planning and Policy
Forecasting
Policy Environment
Security and
Emergencies
Education and Economics
Training
Operations and Planning and
Traffic
Freight Forecasting
Operations and
Management
Transportation Traffic
Freight Operations and
Transportation Management
Traffic
Operations and
Traffic and Management
Planning
Management
Forecasting
Planning and
Forecasting
Planning and Vehicles and
Forecasting
Data and Equipment
Planning and Terminals and Finance
Information
Planning and Forecasting
Economics Facilities
Technology
Forecasting
Design Planning and Society
Planning and Forecasting
Terminals and Finance
Forecasting
Planning and Facilities
Forecasting
Planning and Economics
Forecasting
Planning and Safety and Human Economics
Forecasting
Planning and Factors
Forecasting
Operations and Security and Terminals and
Traffic
Planning and Emergencies
Energy Facilities
Management
Forecasting
Design Maintenance and Safety and Human
Design Preservation
Safety and Human Factors
Education and
Finance Factors
Economics Training
Society Economics
Public Society Finance
Transportation
Data and Planning and Passenger
Information
Data and Forecasting
Planning and Transportation
Economics
Technology
Information Forecasting
Construction Economics
Technology
Finance
Design Geotechnology Environment
Society Economics
Public Design Operations and Passenger
Transportation
Safety and Human Terminals and Traffic Transportation
Factors Facilities Management
Design Safety and Human Society
Operations and Factorsand Human
Safety
Traffic
Safety and Human Factors
Vehicles and Policy
Management
Factors Equipment
Operations and Safety and Human Society Economics
Traffic
Planning and Factors
Management
Forecasting
Environment
Environment
Environment
Safety and Human Terminals and
Factors
Design Facilities
Materials
Finance Energy Environment
Design Bridges and other
Design structures
Geotechnology Hydraulics and
Design Geotechnology Hydrology
Materials Pavements
Design Materials
Design Pavements Finance
Geotechnology Bridges and other
Design structures
Geotechnology
Design Geotechnology
Design Bridges and other
Design structures
Planning and Economics
Administration and Forecasting
Planning and
Management
Pavements Forecasting
Planning and Economics
Operations and Forecasting
Pavements
Traffic
Maintenance and Operations and Hydraulics and
Management
Preservation Traffic Hydrology
Materials Bridges and other Finance
Management
structures
Security and Bridges and other
Emergencies
Operations and structures
Bridges and other
Traffic
Administration and structures
Design
Management
Management
Design Hydraulics and
Design Hydrology
Environment
Design
Design
Design Geotechnology Economics
Materials Geotechnology
Materials Geotechnology
Design Safety and Human
Design Factors
Operations and
Design Traffic
Bridges and other Economics
Management
structures
Design Geotechnology
Design Terminals and
Planning and Facilities
Bridges and other
Forecasting
Design structures
Bridges and other Finance
Design structures
Materials Bridges and other
Design Pavements structures
Operations and Safety and Human
Traffic
Design Factors
Safety and Human
Management Factors
Design Operations and
Design Traffic
Operations and
Management
Traffic
Maintenance and Planning and
Preservation Management
Forecasting
Design Bridges and other
Geotechnology structures
Bridges and other
Design structures
Pavements Terminals and
Design Hydraulics and Facilities
Environment
Hydrology
Sustainability Score
Environment Economy Equity Total
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0.5 0.5 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0.5 1
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 1 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
1 1 1 3
1 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0.5 1
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0 0
1 0.5 0 1.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
0 0 1 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
1 1 0.5 2.5
1 1 0.5 2.5
1 0 1 2
1 0.5 0.5 2
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
1 0 0.5 1.5
1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0.5 0 0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
1 0 0 1
0.5 0 0 0.5
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 1 1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5
0 1 0.5 1.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0.5 0 1 1.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
1 0 0 1
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0.5 1 0.5 2
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 2
0.5 0.5 0 1
0.5 0.5 0 1
0.5 0 0.5 1
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0.5 0.5 1 2
0 0.5 0.5 1
0.5 0 0.5 1
1 0 0 1
0 0 1 1
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 1 0.5 1.5
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5 Note: "Revised - this project has been funded under the HMCRP as project HM-05"
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0.5 1
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 1 2
1 0.5 0.5 2
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
1 0.5 0.5 2
1 0.5 0.5 2
0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 1 1 2.5
0.5 0.5 1 2
1 0 0.5 1.5
0 0.5 0.5 1 *Note: same project repeated in 2009 but different committee
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 1 1
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 2
0 0.5 1 1.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 1 2
0 1 1 2
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 1 0.5 2
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 1 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0 0 0 0
0.5 0 0 0.5
0.5 0 0 0.5
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
1 0.5 0 1.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5
0 0 0 0
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
1 0 0 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0.5 0.5 1 2
0.5 0.5 0 1
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0.5 0.5 0 1
0.5 0.5 0 1
0 0.5 0.5 1
0 0 1 1
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0.5 0 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0.5 0 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0.5 0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0.5 0.5 1
1 0 0 1
he HMCRP as project HM-05"
Categories TRB Subjects Search Terms
Systems Planning Administration and Management Economic Development
Programming Aviation Economy
Project Development Bridges and other structures Environment
Construction Construction Equity
Operations Data and Information Technology Society
Maintenance Design Sustainability
Economics Sustainable
Education and Training
Energy
Environment
Finance
Freight Transportation
Geotechnology
Highways
History
Hydraulics and Hydrology
Law
Maintenance and Preservation
Marine Transportation
Materials
Motor Carriers
Operations and Traffic Management
Passenger Transportation
Pavements
Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Pipelines
Planning and Forecasting
Policy
Public Transportation
Railroads
Research
Safety and Human Factors
Security and Emergencies
Society
Terminals and Facilities
Transportation (General)
Vehicles and Equipment
Sustainability Topic Sustainability Score
Health/Environmental Damage 0
Standards 0.5
Noise 1
Land Use
Emissions and Waste
This sheet includes lists used to
Renewable Resources populate the 'Records' fields in
Non-renewable Resources the form of drop-down menus.
Energy
Recycling
Access
Safety
Intragenerational Equity
Intergenerational Equity
Affordability
Efficiency
Social Cost
Employment
Total records = 325 Sustainability Topic Count % of records
Efficiency 115 44.57%
Safety 97 37.60%
Access 56 21.71%
Emissions and Waste 44 17.05%
Intragenerational Equity 39 15.12%
Health/Environmental Damage 39 15.12%
Social Cost 20 7.75%
Energy 18 6.98%
Affordability 10 3.88%
Land Use 10 3.88%
Non-renewable Resources 5 1.94%
Employment 5 1.94%
Noise 4 1.55%
Standards 3 1.16%
Recycling 2 0.78%
Renewable Resources 2 0.78%
Intergenerational Equity 1 0.39%
Primary Category Count Secondary Category Count Total % Records related to sustainab
Programming 88 Programming 73 161 0.624031
Systems Planning 91 Systems Planning 2 93 0.360465 Year
Operations 19 Operations 66 85 0.329457 2006
Construction 38 Construction 6 44 0.170543 2007
Maintenance 15 Maintenance 28 43 0.166667 2008
Project Development 7 Project Development 17 24 0.093023 2009
2010
2011
2012
Records related to sustainability by year
Total Records Score % related
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
26 2 16 7 0 1 0 0 92.3%
123 22 40 36 12 12 1 0 82.1%
35 9 17 6 3 0 0 0 74.3%
24 10 8 4 2 0 0 0 58.3%
60 6 16 26 8 2 2 0 90.0%
21 4 7 6 3 0 0 1 81.0%
35 13 19 3 0 0 0 0 62.9%
Records that meet sustainability categories Score for records addressing all three categories
One Two Three Total Score Records
144 82 32 258 1.5 16
55.8% 31.8% 12.4% 2 12
2.5 3
3 1
Sustainability categories addressed by RNS Records Environment
Total Score Records
0.5 1 Total 0.5 1
Environme 69 27 96 0 points 67 - -
Economy 119 12 131 0.5 points 123 16 0
Equity/Soc 156 21 177 1 point 88 27 14
1.5 points 28 17 4
2 points 15 8 6
2.5 points 3 1 2
3 points 1 0 1
Total: 325
Economy Equity
0.5 1 0.5 1
- - - -
34 0 73 0
54 1 53 6
23 2 20 6
8 5 8 7
0 3 2 1
0 1 0 1
Primary Decision-Making Category258 Records
2.71%
5.81%

14.73%
34.11%

Programming
Systems Planning
Operations
Construction
Maintenance
Project Development
7.36%

35.27%
Secondary Decision-Making Category192 Records

8.85%

14.58%

38.02%
Programming
Systems Planning
Operations
Construction
3.13% Maintenance
Project Development

1.04%

34.38%
Total Records Addressing Each Decision-Making Area258 Records - Primary and Secondary Areas Combined
70.00%

62.4%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%
36.0%
32.9%

30.00%

20.00%
17.1% 16.7%

10.00% 9.3%

0.00%
Programming Systems Planning Operations Construction Maintenance Project Development
Number of Records per Year by Score and Percent of Records Related to Sustainability
140 100.0%

92.3%
123 90.0% 90.0%
120
82.1% 81.0% 80.0%

74.3%
100
70.0%
3 points
62.9% 2.5 points

Perent of Records Scoring >0


60.0% 2 points
80 58.3%
1.5 points
Number of Records

1 point
50.0% 0.5 points
0 points
60 total
60
40.0% Percent of records scoring >0

30.0%
40
35 35

26 20.0%
24
21
20
10.0%

0 0.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Records by Total Sustainability Score

4.6%

8.6% 20.6%

0.9% 0.3%

0 points
0.5 points
1 point
1.5 points
2 points
2.5 points
3 points
27.1%

37.8%
Categories addressed by Records Scoring 0.5123 Records
80

73

70

60

50

40

34

30

20
16

10

0
Environment 0 Economy 0 Equity
Categories addressed by Records Scoring 188 Records
70

60

6
1

50

40
1
0.5
14

30
54 53

20

27

10

0
Environment Economy Equity
Categories addressed by Records Scoring 1.528 Records
30

25
2
6

20
4

1
0.5
15

23

10 20

17

0
Environment Economy Equity
Categories addressed by Records Scoring 215 Records
16

14

12

10

1
0.5
8

4 8 8 8

0
Environment Economy Equity
Categories addressed by Records Scoring 2.53 Records
3.5

2.5 1

2 2
1
0.5

1.5 3

1 2

0.5 1

0 0
Environment Economy Equity
Summary of Sustainability Categories Addressed by RNS Records (n=258)
200

180 1 point
0.5 points 21
160

140

12
Number of records

120

100

80 27 156
60 119
40
69
20

0
Environment Economy Equity/Society
Record Environment Economy Equity Total
11 1 1 3
21 1 0.5 2.5
Sust
31 1 0.5 2.5
4 0.5 1 1 2.5 3.5
51 0.5 0.5 2
61 0.5 0.5 2
3
71 0.5 0.5 2
81 0.5 0.5 2
91 1 2
2.5
10 1 1 2
11 0.5 1 0.5 2
12 0.5 1 0.5 2
2
13 0.5 1 0.5 2
14 0.5 1 0.5 2

Score
15 0.5 0.5 1 2
1.5
16 0.5 0.5 1 2
17 0.5 0.5 1 2
18 0.5 0.5 1 2 1
19 1 1 2
20 1 0.5 1.5
21 1 0.5 1.5 0.5
22 1 0.5 1.5
23 1 0.5 1.5
24 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 0
25 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 1 9 1 7 25 33 4 1 49 5 7 6 5 73 8 1 89 9 7 0
1
26 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
27 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
28 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
29 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
30 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
31 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
32 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
33 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
34 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
35 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
36 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
37 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
38 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
39 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5
40 0.5 1 1.5
41 1 0.5 1.5
42 1 0.5 1.5
43 0.5 1 1.5
44 0.5 1 1.5
45 0.5 1 1.5
46 0.5 1 1.5
47 0.5 1 1.5
48 1 1
49 1 1
50 1 1
51 1 1
52 1 1
53 1 1
54 1 1
55 1 1
56 1 1
57 1 1
58 1 1
59 1 1
60 1 1
61 1 1
62 0.5 0.5 1
63 0.5 0.5 1
64 0.5 0.5 1
65 0.5 0.5 1
66 0.5 0.5 1
67 0.5 0.5 1
68 0.5 0.5 1
69 0.5 0.5 1
70 0.5 0.5 1
71 0.5 0.5 1
72 0.5 0.5 1
73 0.5 0.5 1
74 0.5 0.5 1
75 0.5 0.5 1
76 0.5 0.5 1
77 0.5 0.5 1
78 0.5 0.5 1
79 0.5 0.5 1
80 0.5 0.5 1
81 0.5 0.5 1
82 0.5 0.5 1
83 0.5 0.5 1
84 0.5 0.5 1
85 0.5 0.5 1
86 0.5 0.5 1
87 0.5 0.5 1
88 0.5 0.5 1
89 1 1
90 0.5 0.5 1
91 0.5 0.5 1
92 0.5 0.5 1
93 0.5 0.5 1
94 0.5 0.5 1
95 0.5 0.5 1
96 0.5 0.5 1
97 0.5 0.5 1
98 0.5 0.5 1
99 0.5 0.5 1
100 0.5 0.5 1
101 0.5 0.5 1
102 0.5 0.5 1
103 0.5 0.5 1
104 0.5 0.5 1
105 0.5 0.5 1
106 0.5 0.5 1
107 0.5 0.5 1
108 0.5 0.5 1
109 0.5 0.5 1
110 0.5 0.5 1
111 0.5 0.5 1
112 0.5 0.5 1
113 0.5 0.5 1
114 0.5 0.5 1
115 0.5 0.5 1
116 0.5 0.5 1
117 0.5 0.5 1
118 0.5 0.5 1
119 0.5 0.5 1
120 0.5 0.5 1
121 0.5 0.5 1
122 0.5 0.5 1
123 0.5 0.5 1
124 0.5 0.5 1
125 0.5 0.5 1
126 0.5 0.5 1
127 0.5 0.5 1
128 0.5 0.5 1
129 0.5 0.5 1
130 1 1
131 1 1
132 1 1
133 1 1
134 1 1
135 1 1
136 0.5 0.5
137 0.5 0.5
138 0.5 0.5
139 0.5 0.5
140 0.5 0.5
141 0.5 0.5
142 0.5 0.5
143 0.5 0.5
144 0.5 0.5
145 0.5 0.5
146 0.5 0.5
147 0.5 0.5
148 0.5 0.5
149 0.5 0.5
150 0.5 0.5
151 0.5 0.5
152 0.5 0.5
153 0.5 0.5
154 0.5 0.5
155 0.5 0.5
156 0.5 0.5
157 0.5 0.5
158 0.5 0.5
159 0.5 0.5
160 0.5 0.5
161 0.5 0.5
162 0.5 0.5
163 0.5 0.5
164 0.5 0.5
165 0.5 0.5
166 0.5 0.5
167 0.5 0.5
168 0.5 0.5
169 0.5 0.5
170 0.5 0.5
171 0.5 0.5
172 0.5 0.5
173 0.5 0.5
174 0.5 0.5
175 0.5 0.5
176 0.5 0.5
177 0.5 0.5
178 0.5 0.5
179 0.5 0.5
180 0.5 0.5
181 0.5 0.5
182 0.5 0.5
183 0.5 0.5
184 0.5 0.5
185 0.5 0.5
186 0.5 0.5
187 0.5 0.5
188 0.5 0.5
189 0.5 0.5
190 0.5 0.5
191 0.5 0.5
192 0.5 0.5
193 0.5 0.5
194 0.5 0.5
195 0.5 0.5
196 0.5 0.5
197 0.5 0.5
198 0.5 0.5
199 0.5 0.5
200 0.5 0.5
201 0.5 0.5
202 0.5 0.5
203 0.5 0.5
204 0.5 0.5
205 0.5 0.5
206 0.5 0.5
207 0.5 0.5
208 0.5 0.5
209 0.5 0.5
210 0.5 0.5
211 0.5 0.5
212 0.5 0.5
213 0.5 0.5
214 0.5 0.5
215 0.5 0.5
216 0.5 0.5
217 0.5 0.5
218 0.5 0.5
219 0.5 0.5
220 0.5 0.5
221 0.5 0.5
222 0.5 0.5
223 0.5 0.5
224 0.5 0.5
225 0.5 0.5
226 0.5 0.5
227 0.5 0.5
228 0.5 0.5
229 0.5 0.5
230 0.5 0.5
231 0.5 0.5
232 0.5 0.5
233 0.5 0.5
234 0.5 0.5
235 0.5 0.5
236 0.5 0.5
237 0.5 0.5
238 0.5 0.5
239 0.5 0.5
240 0.5 0.5
241 0.5 0.5
242 0.5 0.5
243 0.5 0.5
244 0.5 0.5
245 0.5 0.5
246 0.5 0.5
247 0.5 0.5
248 0.5 0.5
249 0.5 0.5
250 0.5 0.5
251 0.5 0.5
252 0.5 0.5
253 0.5 0.5
254 0.5 0.5
255 0.5 0.5
256 0.5 0.5
257 0.5 0.5
258 0.5 0.5
259 0
260 0
261 0
262 0
263 0
264 0
265 0
266 0
267 0
268 0
269 0
270 0
271 0
272 0
273 0
274 0
275 0
276 0
277 0
278 0
279 0
280 0
281 0
282 0
283 0
284 0
285 0
286 0
287 0
288 0
289 0
290 0
291 0
292 0
293 0
294 0
295 0
296 0
297 0
298 0
299 0
300 0
301 0
302 0
303 0
304 0
305 0
306 0
307 0
308 0
309 0
310 0
311 0
312 0
313 0
314 0
315 0
316 0
317 0
318 0
319 0
320 0
321 0
322 0
323 0
324 0
325 0
Sustainabilty Score for Each Record

4 1 49 5 7 6 5 73 8 1 89 9 7 10 5 11 3 1 2 1 12 9 1 3 7 14 5 15 3 16 1 1 6 9 17 7 18 5 1 9 3 20 1 20 9 21 7 2 2 5 23 3 24 1 2 4 9 25 7 2 6 5 27 3 2 8 1 28 9 29 7 3 0 5 31 3 3 2 1

Record
5 3 1 9 7 5 3 1
2 6 27 2 8 28 29 3 0 31 3 2
Percent of Records (scoring 0.5 and up) that Address Sustainability Areas258 Records
50.00%

45%
45.00%

40.00%
38%

35.00%

30.00%

25.00%
22%
20.00%
17%
15% 15%
15.00%

10.00%
8%
7%

5.00% 4% 4%
2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0%
0.00%
cy fet
y s te i ty ag
e st gy ty e es en
t e s g s ty
en es as qu Co er ili Us rc is rd in ur
ce ui
ci Sa Ac
c W lE am l En ab nd ou y m No nd
a cl Eq
d D ci
a d La s pl
o cy so l
Effi an na ta
l
So or Re Sta Re Re on
a
ns tio en Aff e Em bl
e
ra bl ati
si
o
n e nm wa wa n er
is e e
ge i ro n n ge
Em tra nv -re Re ter
In /E n In
th No
al
He
Percent of Records that Address One or More of the Three Sustainability Dimensions
60.0%

55.8%

50.0%

40.0%
Percent of Records

31.8%

30.0%

20.0%

12.4%

10.0%

0.0%
One Two Three
Score for Records Addressing all 3 Dimensions
18

16
16

14

12
12
Number of Records

10

4
3

2
1

0
1.5 2 2.5 3

Score
No. of Records Number of records that scored…
Search Term Found 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Economic Development 20 0 7 7 2 4 0
Economy 55 10 17 19 6 2 1
Environment 186 40 76 45 15 8 1
Equity 50 11 12 12 8 6 1
Society 44 9 16 13 3 1 1
Sustainability 30 6 8 9 4 2 0
Sustainable 56 8 15 23 4 5 0

3
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
Committee

A0020T, Special Task Force on Climate Change and Energy

AP010, Transit Management and Performance

ADA40, Transportation Needs of National Parks and Public Lands

AFH30, Emerging Technology for Design and Construction

ADB40, Transportation Demand Forecasting


ADC10, Environmental Analysis in Transportation

ADC70, Transportation Energy


ADD30, Transportation and Land Development
ADD50, Environmental Justice in Transportation
AFB40, Landscape and Environmental Design
AHB70, Access Management
AW030, Marine Environment
Sustainability Score
Record Title Envi. Econ. Eq. Total
Analysis of Social Costs and Benefits of Advanced Biofuels and Other Low 1 1 0.5 2.5
Carbon Fuels
Analysis of Synergies between Transit, Land Use, and Pricing Strategies to 1 1 0.5 2.5
Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Quantify and Incorporate Environmental Benefits into Life Cycle Costing Models 1 0.5 0.5 2
for Common Roadway Construction Practices
Performance Measures for Societal Goals 0.5 1 1 2.5
Innovative Applications of Sustainability Performance Measures for Transit 0.5 0.5 1 2
Planning
The Economic Impact of Public Lands Transportation Systems on Gateway 1 0.5 0.5 2
Communities
The Economic Impact of Transportation Systems on Gateway Communities 0.5 1 0.5 2
Research Program to Develop a Sustainable Decision Making Tool for 1 1 1 3
Transportation Applications Based on Life Cycle Assessment
Policy Sensitivity: Trip-Based vs. Tour- and Activity-Based Models 0.5 0.5 1 2
Analysis of Property Value Impacts of Transportation Projects 0.5 1 0.5 2
Potential Travel Responses to Alternative Highway Pricing and Financing Systems 0.5 1 0.5 2
and the Impact of Fuel Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Parking Strategies to Reduce Environmental Impacts and Improve Place 1 0.5 0.5 2
Establishing Equity Measures for Environmental Justice Cost-Benefit Analyses 0.5 0.5 1 2
Early and Continuous Scoping and Stakeholder Involvement 0.5 0.5 1 2
Determining The Economic Value of Roadway Access Management 0.5 1 0.5 2
Controlling Air Emissions At Marine Port Terminal Operations 1 0.5 0.5 2
Committee

AHD65, Winter Maintenance

A0020T, Special Task Force on Climate Change and Energy

AHB30, Vehicle-Highway Automation

ANF10, Pedestrians

ADD30, Transportation and Land Development

ADD50, Environmental Justice in Transportation

ABE30, Transportation Issues in Major U.S. Cities


AFB50T, Task Force on Context Sensitive Design/Solutions (CSD/CSS)

AHB15, Intelligent Transportation Systems

AHB35, High-Occupancy Vehicle, High-Occupancy Toll, and Managed Lanes

AHD10, Maintenance and Operations Management

ANF20, Bicycle Transportation


AR010, Intercity Passenger Rail
AT045, Intermodal Freight Transport
Sustainability Score
Record Title Link
Environment
Demonstrating A Systematic, Multi-Criteria Approach to Deicer Selection http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=22203 0.5
Effect of Solar Loading and Radiational Cooling on Pavement Surface http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12766 0.5
Temperature
Winter Road Maintenance Research Roadmap http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=22202 0.5
Driving and the Built Environment Part II http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25859 1
Improved Modal Operating Profiles for Comparisons with Transit http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25877 0.5
Vehicle-Highway Automation - Policy Implications http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13423 0.5
Automated Vehicle Guidance for Mobility Services http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13421 0.5
Effects of Pedestrian Improvements on Transit Ridership and Customer http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27843 0.5
Satisfaction
Synthesis of Pedestrian Infrastructure Assessment Methods and Tools http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=27840 0.5
Investigating the Disaggregate Travel Behavior Effects of the Built Environment http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14112 1

Economic Viability and Community Impact Assessments in Transportation http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=13632 0


Decision Making
Major Cities' Adaptation to Global Climate Change http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=25168 0.5
CSS and Sustainability in Transportation http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14153 0.5
Analyze the Issues that Influence Widespread Deployability of Automated http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=17637 0.5
Transportation Systems, such as Human Attitudes Toward Automation and
Impacts on Transportation and Community Development

Ridesharing as a Complement to Transit http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=26730 0.5


Development of National Service Level Criteria for the Interstate and National http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=12750 0.5
Highway System
Methodology for Bicycle Network Analysis http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=28124 0.5
Estimating Density of Rail Use in Planning for Intercity Rail Networks http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=14892 0.5
Public-Private Partnerships for Increasing Capacity in Rail Corridors http://rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15883 0.5
Sustainability Score
Economy Equity Total
0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 1.5

0.5 0.5 1.5


0 1 2
0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 1.5

0.5 0.5 1.5


0 1 2

1 1 2

0.5 0.5 1.5


0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 1.5

0.5 0.5 1.5


0.5 0.5 1.5

0.5 0.5 1.5


0.5 0.5 1.5
0.5 0.5 1.5
Sustainability Area TRB Subject
Efficiency Administration and Management This list represents data
Health/Environmental Damage Administration and Management used to create crosstab
Safety Administration and Management
Access Administration and Management
Access Administration and Management
Access Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Energy Administration and Management
Health/Environmental Damage Administration and Management
Safety Administration and Management
Social Cost Administration and Management
Social Cost Administration and Management
Standards Administration and Management
Standards Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Emissions and Waste Administration and Management
Intragenerational Equity Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Affordability Administration and Management
Intragenerational Equity Administration and Management
Access Administration and Management
Affordability Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Emissions and Waste Administration and Management
Employment Administration and Management
Health/Environmental Damage Administration and Management
Health/Environmental Damage Administration and Management
Intragenerational Equity Administration and Management
Intragenerational Equity Administration and Management
Intragenerational Equity Administration and Management
Safety Administration and Management
Social Cost Administration and Management
Affordability Administration and Management
Health/Environmental Damage Administration and Management
Health/Environmental Damage Administration and Management
Social Cost Administration and Management
Access Administration and Management
Affordability Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Efficiency Administration and Management
Health/Environmental Damage Administration and Management
Health/Environmental Damage Administration and Management
Land Use Administration and Management
Non-renewable Resources Administration and Management
Access Aviation
Efficiency Aviation
Efficiency Aviation
Efficiency Aviation
Emissions and Waste Aviation
Emissions and Waste Aviation
Emissions and Waste Aviation
Emissions and Waste Aviation
Emissions and Waste Aviation
Emissions and Waste Aviation
Health/Environmental Damage Aviation
Intragenerational Equity Aviation
Noise Aviation
Safety Aviation
Safety Aviation
Safety Aviation
Safety Aviation
Safety Aviation
Safety Aviation
Standards Aviation
Efficiency Aviation
Efficiency Aviation
Emissions and Waste Aviation
Employment Aviation
Health/Environmental Damage Aviation
Health/Environmental Damage Aviation
Health/Environmental Damage Aviation
Noise Aviation
Noise Aviation
Noise Aviation
Renewable Resources Aviation
Non-renewable Resources Aviation
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Safety Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Safety Bridges and other structures
Safety Bridges and other structures
Safety Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Safety Bridges and other structures
Safety Bridges and other structures
Emissions and Waste Bridges and other structures
Affordability Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Safety Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Bridges and other structures
Safety Bridges and other structures
Emissions and Waste Bridges and other structures
Efficiency Construction
Health/Environmental Damage Construction
Access Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Emissions and Waste Construction
Emissions and Waste Construction
Health/Environmental Damage Construction
Health/Environmental Damage Construction
Health/Environmental Damage Construction
Health/Environmental Damage Construction
Health/Environmental Damage Construction
Health/Environmental Damage Construction
Non-renewable Resources Construction
Recycling Construction
Safety Construction
Safety Construction
Safety Construction
Safety Construction
Safety Construction
Safety Construction
Safety Construction
Safety Construction
Standards Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Intragenerational Equity Construction
Intragenerational Equity Construction
Safety Construction
Safety Construction
Emissions and Waste Construction
Emissions and Waste Construction
Affordability Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Efficiency Construction
Emissions and Waste Construction
Emissions and Waste Construction
Health/Environmental Damage Construction
Land Use Construction
Recycling Construction
Safety Construction
Efficiency Construction
Safety Construction
Noise Construction
Social Cost Construction
Safety Construction
Social Cost Construction
Emissions and Waste Construction
Social Cost Construction
Emissions and Waste Data and Information Technology
Health/Environmental Damage Data and Information Technology
Safety Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Emissions and Waste Data and Information Technology
Health/Environmental Damage Data and Information Technology
Health/Environmental Damage Data and Information Technology
Intragenerational Equity Data and Information Technology
Safety Data and Information Technology
Safety Data and Information Technology
Safety Data and Information Technology
Safety Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Safety Data and Information Technology
Energy Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Access Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Emissions and Waste Data and Information Technology
Health/Environmental Damage Data and Information Technology
Intragenerational Equity Data and Information Technology
Safety Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Efficiency Data and Information Technology
Intragenerational Equity Data and Information Technology
Social Cost Data and Information Technology
Access Design
Access Design
Affordability Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Access Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Intragenerational Equity Design
Intragenerational Equity Design
Intragenerational Equity Design
Intragenerational Equity Design
Non-renewable Resources Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Access Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Intragenerational Equity Design
Intragenerational Equity Design
Safety Design
Access Design
Access Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Access Design
Access Design
Access Design
Affordability Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Intragenerational Equity Design
Land Use Design
Recycling Design
Safety Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Safety Design
Safety Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Efficiency Design
Health/Environmental Damage Design
Social Cost Design
Access Design
Safety Design
Emissions and Waste Design
Intragenerational Equity Design
Land Use Design
Efficiency Economics
Renewable Resources Economics
Access Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Standards Economics
Access Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Energy Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Safety Economics
Safety Economics
Social Cost Economics
Social Cost Economics
Affordability Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Health/Environmental Damage Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Safety Economics
Access Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Employment Economics
Access Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Social Cost Economics
Access Economics
Affordability Economics
Affordability Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Employment Economics
Employment Economics
Health/Environmental Damage Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Intragenerational Equity Economics
Land Use Economics
Land Use Economics
Social Cost Economics
Social Cost Economics
Social Cost Economics
Access Economics
Affordability Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Employment Economics
Energy Economics
Recycling Economics
Safety Economics
Access Economics
Efficiency Economics
Emissions and Waste Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Employment Economics
Health/Environmental Damage Economics
Social Cost Economics
Access Economics
Affordability Economics
Efficiency Economics
Efficiency Economics
Health/Environmental Damage Economics
Safety Economics
Land Use Economics
Intragenerational Equity Education and Training
Safety Education and Training
Safety Education and Training
Safety Education and Training
Access Education and Training
Efficiency Education and Training
Intragenerational Equity Education and Training
Safety Education and Training
Safety Education and Training
Access Education and Training
Efficiency Education and Training
Safety Education and Training
Safety Education and Training
Emissions and Waste Education and Training
Employment Education and Training
Safety Education and Training
Access Education and Training
Health/Environmental Damage Education and Training
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Energy Energy
Access Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Energy Energy
Energy Energy
Energy Energy
Health/Environmental Damage Energy
Efficiency Energy
Efficiency Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Energy Energy
Energy Energy
Renewable Resources Energy
Efficiency Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Energy Energy
Health/Environmental Damage Energy
Non-renewable Resources Energy
Energy Energy
Efficiency Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Energy Energy
Access Energy
Efficiency Energy
Efficiency Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Energy Energy
Health/Environmental Damage Energy
Non-renewable Resources Energy
Standards Energy
Efficiency Energy
Efficiency Energy
Energy Energy
Energy Energy
Energy Energy
Health/Environmental Damage Energy
Safety Energy
Affordability Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Energy Energy
Renewable Resources Energy
Safety Energy
Safety Energy
Social Cost Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Energy Energy
Intergenerational Equity Energy
Non-renewable Resources Energy
Social Cost Energy
Social Cost Energy
Standards Energy
Emissions and Waste Energy
Intragenerational Equity Energy
Efficiency Energy
Efficiency Energy
Efficiency Energy
Noise Environment
Efficiency Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Energy Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Standards Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Standards Environment
Efficiency Environment
Efficiency Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Energy Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Intragenerational Equity Environment
Non-renewable Resources Environment
Safety Environment
Standards Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Access Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Energy Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Standards Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Noise Environment
Access Environment
Efficiency Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Energy Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Land Use Environment
Renewable Resources Environment
Safety Environment
Social Cost Environment
Emissions and Waste Environment
Intergenerational Equity Environment
Social Cost Environment
Standards Environment
Non-renewable Resources Environment
Efficiency Environment
Efficiency Environment
Health/Environmental Damage Environment
Efficiency Environment
Efficiency Finance
Intragenerational Equity Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Intragenerational Equity Finance
Intragenerational Equity Finance
Safety Finance
Social Cost Finance
Social Cost Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Energy Finance
Intragenerational Equity Finance
Land Use Finance
Safety Finance
Social Cost Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Intragenerational Equity Finance
Social Cost Finance
Social Cost Finance
Access Finance
Emissions and Waste Finance
Access Finance
Affordability Finance
Social Cost Finance
Affordability Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Emissions and Waste Finance
Health/Environmental Damage Finance
Social Cost Finance
Social Cost Finance
Social Cost Finance
Affordability Finance
Efficiency Finance
Health/Environmental Damage Finance
Health/Environmental Damage Finance
Intragenerational Equity Finance
Social Cost Finance
Social Cost Finance
Efficiency Finance
Health/Environmental Damage Finance
Safety Finance
Safety Finance
Safety Finance
Social Cost Finance
Safety Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Efficiency Finance
Health/Environmental Damage Finance
Intragenerational Equity Finance
Safety Finance
Efficiency Finance
Renewable Resources Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Emissions and Waste Freight Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Freight Transportation
Safety Freight Transportation
Safety Freight Transportation
Safety Freight Transportation
Safety Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Emissions and Waste Freight Transportation
Energy Freight Transportation
Land Use Freight Transportation
Safety Freight Transportation
Social Cost Freight Transportation
Social Cost Freight Transportation
Access Freight Transportation
Emissions and Waste Freight Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Freight Transportation
Safety Freight Transportation
Safety Freight Transportation
Emissions and Waste Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Efficiency Freight Transportation
Emissions and Waste Freight Transportation
Safety Geotechnology
Emissions and Waste Geotechnology
Safety Geotechnology
Efficiency Geotechnology
Efficiency Geotechnology
Emissions and Waste Geotechnology
Health/Environmental Damage Geotechnology
Health/Environmental Damage Geotechnology
Health/Environmental Damage Geotechnology
Safety Geotechnology
Efficiency Geotechnology
Efficiency Geotechnology
Efficiency Geotechnology
Emissions and Waste Geotechnology
Recycling Geotechnology
Safety Geotechnology
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Affordability Highways
Affordability Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Land Use Highways
Non-renewable Resources Highways
Non-renewable Resources Highways
Recycling Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Standards Highways
Standards Highways
Efficiency Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Access Highways
Affordability Highways
Affordability Highways
Affordability Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Employment Highways
Employment Highways
Employment Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Energy Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Land Use Highways
Land Use Highways
Land Use Highways
Land Use Highways
Land Use Highways
Recycling Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Noise Highways
Access Highways
Affordability Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Efficiency Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Emissions and Waste Highways
Employment Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Health/Environmental Damage Highways
Intergenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Intragenerational Equity Highways
Land Use Highways
Land Use Highways
Non-renewable Resources Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Safety Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Social Cost Highways
Non-renewable Resources Highways
Efficiency History
Emissions and Waste History
Renewable Resources History
Emissions and Waste Hydraulics and Hydrology
Health/Environmental Damage Hydraulics and Hydrology
Health/Environmental Damage Hydraulics and Hydrology
Standards Hydraulics and Hydrology
Efficiency Hydraulics and Hydrology
Land Use Hydraulics and Hydrology
Health/Environmental Damage Hydraulics and Hydrology
Safety Law
Intragenerational Equity Law
Access Maintenance and Preservation
Efficiency Maintenance and Preservation
Efficiency Maintenance and Preservation
Efficiency Maintenance and Preservation
Emissions and Waste Maintenance and Preservation
Non-renewable Resources Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Standards Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Access Maintenance and Preservation
Energy Maintenance and Preservation
Health/Environmental Damage Maintenance and Preservation
Health/Environmental Damage Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Safety Maintenance and Preservation
Health/Environmental Damage Maintenance and Preservation
Efficiency Maintenance and Preservation
Efficiency Maintenance and Preservation
Efficiency Maintenance and Preservation
Efficiency Maintenance and Preservation
Health/Environmental Damage Marine Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Marine Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Marine Transportation
Efficiency Marine Transportation
Efficiency Marine Transportation
Efficiency Marine Transportation
Emissions and Waste Marine Transportation
Emissions and Waste Marine Transportation
Efficiency Marine Transportation
Efficiency Materials
Emissions and Waste Materials
Efficiency Materials
Efficiency Materials
Efficiency Materials
Emissions and Waste Materials
Safety Materials
Safety Materials
Efficiency Materials
Emissions and Waste Materials
Non-renewable Resources Materials
Efficiency Materials
Efficiency Materials
Efficiency Materials
Safety Materials
Emissions and Waste Materials
Safety Motor Carriers
Safety Motor Carriers
Safety Motor Carriers
Efficiency Motor Carriers
Efficiency Motor Carriers
Energy Motor Carriers
Social Cost Motor Carriers
Affordability Motor Carriers
Safety Motor Carriers
Safety Motor Carriers
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Social Cost Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Affordability Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Emissions and Waste Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Social Cost Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Emissions and Waste Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Standards Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Social Cost Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Emissions and Waste Operations and Traffic Management
Employment Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Land Use Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Social Cost Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Emissions and Waste Operations and Traffic Management
Emissions and Waste Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Intragenerational Equity Operations and Traffic Management
Land Use Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Social Cost Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Access Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Safety Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Operations and Traffic Management
Health/Environmental Damage Operations and Traffic Management
Land Use Operations and Traffic Management
Intragenerational Equity Operations and Traffic Management
Efficiency Passenger Transportation
Safety Passenger Transportation
Access Passenger Transportation
Efficiency Passenger Transportation
Access Passenger Transportation
Efficiency Passenger Transportation
Access Passenger Transportation
Safety Passenger Transportation
Safety Passenger Transportation
Access Passenger Transportation
Access Passenger Transportation
Efficiency Passenger Transportation
Emissions and Waste Passenger Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Passenger Transportation
Efficiency Passenger Transportation
Efficiency Passenger Transportation
Safety Passenger Transportation
Access Passenger Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Passenger Transportation
Efficiency Pavements
Efficiency Pavements
Efficiency Pavements
Recycling Pavements
Safety Pavements
Safety Pavements
Efficiency Pavements
Safety Pavements
Safety Pavements
Safety Pavements
Safety Pavements
Safety Pavements
Energy Pavements
Efficiency Pavements
Efficiency Pavements
Health/Environmental Damage Pavements
Noise Pavements
Efficiency Pavements
Efficiency Pavements
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Intragenerational Equity Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Intragenerational Equity Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Intragenerational Equity Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Land Use Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Intragenerational Equity Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Intragenerational Equity Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Emissions and Waste Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Health/Environmental Damage Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Health/Environmental Damage Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Intragenerational Equity Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Land Use Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Access Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Intragenerational Equity Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Health/Environmental Damage Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Intragenerational Equity Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Safety Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Efficiency Pipelines
Efficiency Pipelines
Safety Pipelines
Safety Pipelines
Safety Pipelines
Emissions and Waste Pipelines
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Emissions and Waste Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Land Use Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Standards Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Affordability Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Emissions and Waste Planning and Forecasting
Energy Planning and Forecasting
Energy Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Land Use Planning and Forecasting
Non-renewable Resources Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Social Cost Planning and Forecasting
Social Cost Planning and Forecasting
Standards Planning and Forecasting
Standards Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Emissions and Waste Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Energy Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Land Use Planning and Forecasting
Noise Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Affordability Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Emissions and Waste Planning and Forecasting
Emissions and Waste Planning and Forecasting
Emissions and Waste Planning and Forecasting
Employment Planning and Forecasting
Employment Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Land Use Planning and Forecasting
Land Use Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Social Cost Planning and Forecasting
Social Cost Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Energy Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Land Use Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Social Cost Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Affordability Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Emissions and Waste Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Health/Environmental Damage Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Intragenerational Equity Planning and Forecasting
Social Cost Planning and Forecasting
Social Cost Planning and Forecasting
Access Planning and Forecasting
Efficiency Planning and Forecasting
Safety Planning and Forecasting
Access Policy
Access Policy
Efficiency Policy
Health/Environmental Damage Policy
Health/Environmental Damage Policy
Access Policy
Access Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Health/Environmental Damage Policy
Health/Environmental Damage Policy
Intragenerational Equity Policy
Intragenerational Equity Policy
Land Use Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Health/Environmental Damage Policy
Intragenerational Equity Policy
Safety Policy
Social Cost Policy
Social Cost Policy
Affordability Policy
Efficiency Policy
Emissions and Waste Policy
Safety Policy
Access Policy
Efficiency Policy
Emissions and Waste Policy
Emissions and Waste Policy
Health/Environmental Damage Policy
Land Use Policy
Safety Policy
Social Cost Policy
Access Policy
Affordability Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Social Cost Policy
Social Cost Policy
Efficiency Policy
Access Policy
Efficiency Policy
Efficiency Policy
Intragenerational Equity Policy
Efficiency Policy
Health/Environmental Damage Policy
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Emissions and Waste Public Transportation
Emissions and Waste Public Transportation
Emissions and Waste Public Transportation
Energy Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Social Cost Public Transportation
Standards Public Transportation
Standards Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Energy Public Transportation
Energy Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Land Use Public Transportation
Social Cost Public Transportation
Standards Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Affordability Public Transportation
Affordability Public Transportation
Affordability Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Emissions and Waste Public Transportation
Energy Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Land Use Public Transportation
Standards Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Affordability Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Land Use Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Social Cost Public Transportation
Social Cost Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Noise Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Emissions and Waste Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Social Cost Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Access Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Efficiency Public Transportation
Emissions and Waste Public Transportation
Employment Public Transportation
Health/Environmental Damage Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Land Use Public Transportation
Land Use Public Transportation
Intragenerational Equity Public Transportation
Safety Public Transportation
Efficiency Railroads
Safety Railroads
Safety Railroads
Efficiency Railroads
Efficiency Railroads
Emissions and Waste Railroads
Intragenerational Equity Railroads
Safety Railroads
Safety Railroads
Safety Railroads
Efficiency Railroads
Emissions and Waste Railroads
Access Railroads
Efficiency Railroads
Intragenerational Equity Railroads
Renewable Resources Railroads
Access Railroads
Access Railroads
Emissions and Waste Railroads
Social Cost Railroads
Efficiency Research
Efficiency Research
Safety Research
Safety Research
Safety Research
Intragenerational Equity Research
Safety Research
Access Research
Efficiency Research
Efficiency Research
Recycling Research
Access Research
Emissions and Waste Research
Safety Research
Emissions and Waste Research
Energy Research
Efficiency Research
Employment Research
Intragenerational Equity Research
Safety Research
Access Research
Affordability Research
Emissions and Waste Research
Efficiency Safety and Human Factors
Health/Environmental Damage Safety and Human Factors
Intragenerational Equity Safety and Human Factors
Intragenerational Equity Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Affordability Safety and Human Factors
Efficiency Safety and Human Factors
Intragenerational Equity Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Social Cost Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Affordability Safety and Human Factors
Efficiency Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Efficiency Safety and Human Factors
Emissions and Waste Safety and Human Factors
Employment Safety and Human Factors
Intragenerational Equity Safety and Human Factors
Noise Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Efficiency Safety and Human Factors
Land Use Safety and Human Factors
Noise Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Intragenerational Equity Safety and Human Factors
Intragenerational Equity Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Safety Safety and Human Factors
Access Safety and Human Factors
Efficiency Safety and Human Factors
Health/Environmental Damage Safety and Human Factors
Health/Environmental Damage Safety and Human Factors
Health/Environmental Damage Safety and Human Factors
Land Use Safety and Human Factors
Health/Environmental Damage Security and Emergencies
Intragenerational Equity Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Efficiency Security and Emergencies
Efficiency Security and Emergencies
Intragenerational Equity Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Efficiency Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Health/Environmental Damage Security and Emergencies
Intragenerational Equity Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Efficiency Security and Emergencies
Safety Security and Emergencies
Access Society
Energy Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Efficiency Society
Efficiency Society
Health/Environmental Damage Society
Health/Environmental Damage Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Affordability Society
Health/Environmental Damage Society
Health/Environmental Damage Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Safety Society
Social Cost Society
Standards Society
Efficiency Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Safety Society
Health/Environmental Damage Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Social Cost Society
Efficiency Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Noise Society
Efficiency Society
Efficiency Society
Efficiency Society
Emissions and Waste Society
Health/Environmental Damage Society
Intragenerational Equity Society
Land Use Society
Safety Society
Access Society
Access Society
Efficiency Society
Employment Society
Efficiency Society
Efficiency Society
Social Cost Society
Land Use Society
Emissions and Waste Terminals and Facilities
Emissions and Waste Terminals and Facilities
Access Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Land Use Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Health/Environmental Damage Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Social Cost Terminals and Facilities
Access Terminals and Facilities
Access Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Health/Environmental Damage Terminals and Facilities
Intragenerational Equity Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Access Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Access Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Health/Environmental Damage Terminals and Facilities
Access Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Health/Environmental Damage Terminals and Facilities
Noise Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Emissions and Waste Terminals and Facilities
Health/Environmental Damage Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Access Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Health/Environmental Damage Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Efficiency Terminals and Facilities
Safety Terminals and Facilities
Emissions and Waste Transportation (General)
Energy Transportation (General)
Intragenerational Equity Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Emissions and Waste Transportation (General)
Health/Environmental Damage Transportation (General)
Social Cost Transportation (General)
Access Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Access Transportation (General)
Health/Environmental Damage Transportation (General)
Intragenerational Equity Transportation (General)
Emissions and Waste Transportation (General)
Non-renewable Resources Transportation (General)
Social Cost Transportation (General)
Affordability Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Energy Transportation (General)
Safety Transportation (General)
Safety Transportation (General)
Social Cost Transportation (General)
Land Use Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Energy Transportation (General)
Standards Transportation (General)
Efficiency Transportation (General)
Energy Vehicles and Equipment
Emissions and Waste Vehicles and Equipment
Energy Vehicles and Equipment
Energy Vehicles and Equipment
Safety Vehicles and Equipment
Efficiency Vehicles and Equipment
Efficiency Vehicles and Equipment
Energy Vehicles and Equipment
Affordability Vehicles and Equipment
Affordability Vehicles and Equipment
Energy Vehicles and Equipment
Social Cost Vehicles and Equipment
Social Cost Vehicles and Equipment
Access Vehicles and Equipment
Emissions and Waste Vehicles and Equipment
Land Use Vehicles and Equipment
Efficiency Vehicles and Equipment
Access Vehicles and Equipment
Health/Environmental Damage Vehicles and Equipment
Su

Emissions
Access Affordability Efficiency and Waste Employment Energy
Administration and
Management 5 4 16 2 1 1
Aviation 1 0 5 7 1 0
Bridges and other
structures 0 1 11 2 0 0
Construction 1 1 15 7 0 0
Data and Information
Technology 10 0 10 3 0 1

Design 10 2 23 9 0 0
Economics 8 5 34 1 5 2
Education and Training
3 0 2 1 1 0
Energy 2 1 11 20 0 15
Environment 2 0 7 14 0 4
Finance 2 3 25 2 0 1
Freight Transportation
1 0 14 5 0 1
Geotechnology 0 0 5 3 0 0
Highways 23 6 71 21 4 11
History 0 0 1 1 0 0
Hydraulics and
Hydrology 0 0 1 1 0 0
Law 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maintenance and
Preservation 2 0 7 1 0 1
TRB Subject

Marine Transportation
0 0 4 2 0 0
Materials 0 0 8 4 0 0
Motor Carriers 0 1 2 0 0 1
Operations and Traffic
Management 16 1 21 5 1 0
Passenger
Transportation 6 0 6 1 0 0
Pavements 0 0 8 0 0 1
Pedestrians and
Bicyclists 24 0 9 1 0 0
Pipelines 0 0 2 1 0 0
Planning and
Forecasting 29 3 41 7 2 4
Policy 7 2 18 3 0 0
Public Transportation
29 4 32 6 1 4
Railroads 3 0 5 3 0 0
Research 3 1 5 3 1 1
Safety and Human
Factors 12 2 6 1 1 0
Security and
Emergencies 0 0 4 0 0 0
Society 3 1 10 1 1 1
Terminals and Facilities
7 0 14 3 0 0
Transportation
(General) 2 1 9 3 0 3
Vehicles and
Equipment 2 2 3 2 0 5
Total 213 41 465 146 19 57
Sustainability Area

Health/Environmental Intergenerational Intragenerational Non-renewable


Damage Equity Equity Land Use Noise Resources Recycling
8 0 5 1 0 1 0

4 0 1 0 4 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8 0 2 1 1 1 2

4 0 3 0 0 0 0

9 0 8 2 0 1 1
4 0 12 3 0 0 1

1 0 2 0 0 0 0

4 1 1 0 0 3 0
13 1 1 1 2 2 0
5 0 7 1 0 0 0

2 0 1 1 0 0 0

3 0 0 0 0 0 1
22 1 24 8 1 4 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 0 0 1 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 0 0

3 0 0 0 0 1 0

3 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 0 2 3 0 0 0

0 0 2 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 1 0 1

3 0 8 2 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14 0 19 6 1 1 0

7 0 4 2 0 0 0

11 0 23 5 1 0 0

0 0 2 0 0 0 0
0 0 2 0 0 0 1
4 0 6 2 2 0 0

2 0 3 0 0 0 0

6 0 13 2 1 0 0

6 0 1 1 1 0 0

2 0 2 1 0 1 0

1 0 0 1 0 0 0

162 3 155 44 15 17 9
Renewable Social
Resources Safety Cost Standards Total
0 3 4 2 53

1 6 0 1 32

0 8 0 0 22

0 13 3 1 56

0 7 1 0 39

0 39 1 0 105
1 5 7 1 89

0 8 0 0 18

2 3 3 2 68
1 2 2 5 57
0 7 12 0 65

1 7 2 0 35

0 4 0 0 16
0 65 12 2 277
1 0 0 0 3

0 0 0 1 7

0 1 0 0 2

0 12 0 1 28

0 0 0 0 9

0 3 0 0 16
0 5 1 0 10

0 31 5 1 95

0 4 0 0 19

0 7 0 0 19

0 29 0 0 76

0 3 0 0 6

0 24 7 3 161

0 3 5 0 51

0 11 5 4 136

1 5 1 0 20
0 6 0 0 23
0 48 1 0 85

0 9 0 0 18

0 3 3 1 46

0 9 1 0 43

0 2 3 1 30

0 1 2 0 19

8 393 81 26 -

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi