Hydrodynamic calculation Howell Bunger valve

!"#$ = 0,6)
* = 0,5555)
# = 0,1583)
/ = 0,1361)
0 = 0,5694)
3 = 0,6861)
4 = 0,1222)
6 = 0,0666)
Fig.1

The Howell Bunger valve today is one of the most widely used valves of dam outlets. Its
construction is simple and the operating forces during opening are relatively small. Other
advantages compared to other types of valves include efficient effluent damping as well as
good aeration of water, which can often be critical to improving its quality.
Incorrect hydraulic design of the discharge object, or even in the case of improper design of
the shutter itself, can result in dangerous shocks and vibrations, which can cause a crash of
the Howell Bunger valve.
The main components are the cylindrical valve body, the outlet cone with radial ribs, the
sliding cylinder and the drive. The outflow cone forms an annular opening with the
cylindrical valve body. The outflow of water creates a hollow cone which is directed in the
outflow chamber into the drain channel. By vigorously swirling water and air in the effluent
chamber, the effluent energy of the water is significantly dampened in a relatively small
space.
The sliding cylinder is the only sliding part of the valve that allows continuous flow control.
The driving forces of the sliding cylinder are small and practically unchanged over the entire
stroke.

1
Fig.2 model no.1

2
Fig.3 model no.2

3
Fig.4 model no.3

4
Fig.5 model no.1

Fig.6 model no.2

5
Fig.7 model no.3

6
1. Calculation of pressure on the Howell Bunger valve during its
rapid closure:
To calculate the pressure on the Howell Bunger valve, we need to know the rated net head
at the zero flow (closed valve). Increase pressure on water hammer must be calculated
before the hydrodynamic calculation of the Howell Bunger. The pressure loss before the
valve must be defined without the Howell Bunger valve (to diameter D).
To calculate the pressure on the Howell Bunger valve because of the ignorance of the piping
system, a calculation for a simple serial connection of the control valves (variable and
constant resistance) will be used.

Relative Flow:
$%
!" =
&' + $%) (1 − ')

Qp relative flow []
fr reduced free flow area in the throttle control system []
p pressure parameter []

Reduced free flow area in the throttle control system:

./
$% =
./012

fr reduced free flow area in the throttle control system []

KQ flow coefficient []
KQmax max. flow coefficient []

Pressure parameter:
∆ℎ
'=
ℎ5

p pressure parameter []
Dh theoretical pressure in the closure at full opening [m]
h0 rated net head [m]

Theoretical pressure in the closure at full opening:

65)
∆ℎ = ∗ (: + 1)
28

Dh theoretical pressure in the closure at full opening [m]

v0 valve speed [m/s]
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
z local loss factor for open valve []

Valve speed:
4!012
65 =
< ∗ =)

7
v0 valve speed [m/s]
Qmax flow [m3/s]
D valve diameter [mm]

Flow in pipeline:
! = !" ∗ !012

Q flow in pipeline [m3/s]

Qp relative flow []
Qmax flow [m3/s]

The water speed in the pipeline:

4!
6=
< ∗ =)

v the water speed in the pipeline [m/s]

Q flow in pipeline [m3/s]
D valve diameter [mm]

The pressure loss in the pipeline:

6)
>? = :
28

HL the pressure loss in the pipeline [m]

v the water speed in the pipeline [m/s]
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
z loss factor []

Loss factor:
1 − ./)
:=
./)

z loss factor []
KQ flow coefficient []

Pressure on the Howell Bunger (when closing the flow):

6) 6)
>@ BCDE FCDGHIJ = ℎD − K5 + − : + L1 − !" M ∗ ΔK
28 28

Hv flow closing pressure on the Howell Bunger valve [m]

h0 rated net head [m]
v the water speed in the pipeline [m/s]
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
Qp relative flow []
ΔP increasing pressure on water hammer [m]

8
P0 under-pressure behind the valve [m]
z loss factor []

9
2. Calculation of pressure on the Howell Bunger valve:
To calculate the pressure on the Howell Bunger valve, we need to know the rated net head
at the zero flow (closed valve). The pressure loss before the valve must be defined without
the Howell Bunger valve (to diameter D).
To calculate the pressure on the Howell Bunger valve because of the ignorance of the piping
system, a calculation for a simple serial connection of the control valves (variable and
constant resistance) will be used.

Relative Flow:
$%
!" =
&' + $%) (1 − ')

Qp relative flow []
fr reduced free flow area in the throttle control system []
p pressure parameter []

Reduced free flow area in the throttle control system:

./
$% =
./012

fr reduced free flow area in the throttle control system []

KQ flow coefficient []
KQmax max. flow coefficient []

Pressure parameter:
∆ℎ
'=
ℎ5

p pressure parameter []
Dh theoretical pressure in the closure at full opening [m]
h0 rated net head [m]

Theoretical pressure in the closure at full opening:

65)
∆ℎ = ∗ (: + 1)
28

Dh theoretical pressure in the closure at full opening [m]

v0 valve speed [m/s]
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
z local loss factor for open valve []

Valve speed:
4!012
65 =
< ∗ =)

v0 valve speed [m/s]

10
Qmax flow [m3/s]
D valve diameter [mm]

Flow in pipeline:
! = !" ∗ !012

Q flow in pipeline [m3/s]

Qp relative flow []
Qmax flow [m3/s]

The water speed in the pipeline:

4!
6=
< ∗ =)

v the water speed in the pipeline [m/s]

Q flow in pipeline [m3/s]
D valve diameter [mm]

The pressure loss in the pipeline:

6)
>? = :
28

HL the pressure loss in the pipeline [m]

v the water speed in the pipeline [m/s]
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
z loss factor []

Loss factor:
1 − ./)
:=
./)

z loss factor []
KQ flow coefficient []

Pressure on the Howell Bunger:

6) 6)
>@ = ℎD − K5 + − :
28 28

Hv pressure on the Howell Bunger valve [m]

h0 rated net head [m]
v the water speed in the pipeline [m/s]
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
P0 under-pressure behind the valve [m]
z loss factor []

11
3. Guideline for the use of the hydrodynamic characteristics of the
Howell Bunger valve:
In the annex section of Fig. 8 to 55, charts of dimensionless coefficients are constructed.
These graphs are the basis for constructing the hydrodynamic characteristics of the Howell
Bunger valve for the projected water dam.

Cavitation number:
10 − 0,1 + ℎ5 − >?
OP =
>@

σα cavitation number []
h0 rated net head [m]
HL the pressure loss in the pipeline [m]
Hv pressure on the Howell Bunger valve [m]

Under-pressure behind the valve:

K5 = STU{.W5 ∗ >@ ; −10}

P0 under-pressure behind the valve [m]

KP0 coefficient of under-pressure []
Hv pressure on the Howell Bunger valve [m]

Forces in axis x:
<=)
Z2 = ∗ [ ∗ 8 ∗ >@ (.2 ± T2 )
4

Fx forces in axis x [kN]

D valve diameter [mm]
r density of liquid [Kg/m3]
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
Hv pressure on the Howell Bunger valve [m]
Kx coefficient of hydraulic force in the axis x []
ax the amplitude of the hydraulic force to the axis x []

Energy before the valve:

For model no.1 a 2
6) 6)
]2 = ℎ5 + + 2,5= − Σ:
28 28
For model no.3
6) 6)
]2 = ℎ5 + + 1,5= − Σ:
28 28

Tx energy before the valve [m]

h0 rated net head [m]
v the water speed in the pipeline [m/s]
D valve diameter [m]

12
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]
Sx pressure loss before valve without Howell Bunger valve []

Under-pressure in hole 1:
K`abc = STU {.W`abc ∗ >@ ; −10}

P1AIR under-pressure in hole 1 [m]

KP1AIR under-pressure coefficient in hole 1 []
Hv pressure on the Howell Bunger valve [m]

Under-pressure in hole 2:
K)abc = STU {.W)abc ∗ >@ ; −10}

P2AIR under-pressure in hole 2 [m]

KP2AIR under-pressure coefficient in hole 2 []
Hv pressure on the Howell Bunger valve [m]

13
4. Dimensioning aerated hole:
To reduce valve vibration, pulsation of hydrodynamic forces and erosion effects of cavitation
by aerating the area behind the valve. The aerated hole should be large enough for air flow
to reach according to research results.

Air flow:
!∗d
!1 =
100

Qa air flow [m3/s]

Q flow in pipeline [m3/s]
b aerated coefficient []

Air velocity in hole 1 and 2:

Air velocity in the narrowest cross section
2 ∗ 8 ∗ K`abc ∗ [
61` = Sef g0,7 ∗ i ; 250j
[1H%

2 ∗ 8 ∗ K)abc ∗ [
61) = Sef g0,7 ∗ i ; 250j
[1H%

va1 air velocity in hole 1 [m/s]

va2 air velocity in hole 2 [m/s]
P1AIR under-pressure in hole 1 [m]
P2AIR under-pressure in hole 2 [m]
rair air density [Kg/m3]
r density of liquid [Kg/m3]
g gravitational acceleration [m/s2]

Hole area 1 and 2:

!1
k=
61` + 61)

S hole area 1 and 2 [m2]

va1 air velocity in hole 1 [m/s]
va2 air velocity in hole 2 [m/s]

Diameter of the hole 1 and 2:

4k
=1 = i
<

Da diameter of the hole 1 and 2 [m]

S hole area 1 and 2 [m2]

14
5. Conclusion:
The most effective is the No.3 design, the design is simple and has very good hydraulic
parameters, mainly the effective aeration of the space before and after the outflow cone,
very good damping of the water and low force loading of the Howell Bunger valve with small
pulsations of hydrodynamic forces and pressures.

Literature:
Miroslav Žajdlík: Výskum priehradových výpustov s rozstrekovacími uzáverami 1980
Miroslav Nechleba: Vodní turbíny jejich konstrukce a příslušenství 1954
V. Kolář, St. Vinopal: Hydraulika průmyslových armatur 1963

15
Fig.8 model no.1

16
Fig.9 model no.1

17
Fig.10 model no.1

18
Fig.11 model no.1

19
Fig.12 model no.1

20
Fig.13 model no.1

21
Fig.14 model no.1

22
Fig.15 model no.1

23
Fig.16 model no.1

24
Fig.17 model no.1

25
Fig.18 model no.1

26
Fig.19 model no.1

27
Fig.20 model no.1

28
Fig.21 model no.1

29
Fig.22 model no.1

30
Fig.23 model no.1

31
Fig.24 model no.2

32
Fig.25 model no.2

33
Fig.26 model no.2

34
Fig.27 model no.2

35
Fig.28 model no.2

36
Fig.29 model no.2

37
Fig.30 model no.2

38
Fig.31 model no.2

39
Fig.32 model no.2

40
Fig.33 model no.2

41
Fig.34 model no.2

42
Fig.35 model no.2

43
Fig.36 model no.2

44
Fig.37 model no.2

45
Fig.38 model no.2

46
Fig.39 model no.2

47
Fig.40 model no.3

48
Fig.41 model no.3

49
Fig.42 model no.3

50
Fig.43 model no.3

51
Fig.44 model no.3

52
Fig.45 model no.3

53
Fig.46 model no.3

54
Fig.47 model no.3

55
Fig.48 model no.3

56
Fig.49 model no.3

57
Fig.50 model no.3

58
Fig.51 model no.3

59
Fig.52 model no.3

60
Fig.53 model no.3

61
Fig.54 model no.3

62
Fig.55 model no.3

63