Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPC

Name of Employee: RICHILIEN L. TENESO

Position: TEACHER II
Service/Division: Schools Division of Iloilo
Rating Period: AUGUST 2018- OCTOBER 2018

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
MFOs KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
Basic Teaching * Prepared Lesson plans or daily logs of August 2018 to 10%
Education -Learning activities. October 2018
Services Process

* Facilitated learning through the use of August 2018 to 20%

instructional materials and innovative October 2018
teaching startegies.

*Monitored attendance, maintained safe August 2018 to 10%

and motivating environment, cleanliness October 2018
and orderliness of classrooms.

Learner's *Checked, recorded, evaluated and August 2018 to 10%

Outcome monitored learner's progress. October 2018

*Conducted remediation for slow learners, August 2018 to 6%

reinforcement for average and enrichment October 2018
activity for the fast learners.

*Kept and maintained accurate learners August 2018 to 7.50%

school records. October 2018

Community Conducted periodic Homeroom Meetings. August 2018 to 10%

Linkages October 2018

Conducted home visitation of SARDOs and August 2018 to 10%

pupils needing academic October 2018
monitoring/follow-up.

Initiated projects and activities with August 2018 to 7.50%

external funding/ sponsorship October 2018

Plus Factor Attended Trainings Based on Idividual Plan August 2018 to 4%

For Professional Development Needs October 2018
 Plus Factor

Served as Brigada Eskwela Coordinator: August 2018 to 4.00%

raised funds and awareness campaign to October 2018
stakeholders; directed the conduct of the
activity

Earn 9 units in Post Graduate Study (Mba) August 2018 to 1.00%

October 2018

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

RICHILIEN L. TENESO MERLITA C. LUNTAO

TEACHER II MASTER TEACHER 1
Ratee Rater
 Annex F
rmance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF)

MERLITA C. LUNTAO Name of Rater

PRINCIPAL II Position
31-Oct-18 Date Review

ACTUAL RESULT
N DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RATING
SCORE
Q E T Ave.
5- All daily lesson logs had the following objective that aligned with the CG , indicating
Teacher's guide, Manual, Textbook & Module, No. learners within mastery level, No. of
learners needing remediation/reinforcement, 4- lacked 1 indicator, 3- lacked 2 indicators, 4 4 4 4.00 0.400
2- lacked 3 indicators, 1- lacked 4 indicators

5- Has provided learning activities that allow all learners reach their full potential, aligned
the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities, instructional materials and
other resources appropriate to the learners, 4- lacked 1 indicator, 3- lacked 2 indicators, 2-
lacked 3 indicators and 1- lacked 4 indicators 5 4 4 4.33 0.867

5- Has checked daily attendance, provided equal opportunities, recognized

fairness and consideration among learners and maintained safe and orderly
classroom, 4- lacked 1 indicator, 3- lacked 2 indicators, 2- lacked 3 indicators and 4 4 4 4.00 0.400
1- lacked 4 indicators

5-Has conducted valid and reliable formative and summative tests as seen in
the pupils portfolio. Has recorded, enterpreted and used test result in improving
teaching learning process and manifisted fairness in the interpretation of test
results, 4- lacked 1 indicator, 3- lacked 2 indicators, 2- lacked 3 indicators and 1- 5 4 4 4.33 0.433
lacked 4 indicators

5- Evidences showed the records of remediation, reinforcement and one-on- one

enrichment activity. Has listed the benificiaries of the activities and given time allotment
as shown in the class program, 4- lacked 1 indicator, 3- lacked 2 indicators , 2- lacked 3 5 5 4 4.67 0.280
indicators and 1- lacked 4 indicators

5- Has prepared Teacher's portfolio contains the records of pupils such as;
School Forms 1, 2 and 5, class record, nutrional status, records of feeding,
grading sheets, age profile, form 137, report card signed by parents, 4- lacked 1
indicator, 3- lacked 2 indicators, 2- lacked 3 indicators and 1- lacked 4 indicators. 5 5 4 4.67 0.350

5- Has showed the minutes of meetings conducted, attendance sheet, action

plan for pupils that needs development and Memorandum of Agreement from
parents of PARDOs, 4- lacked 1 indicator, 3- lacked 2 indicators, 2- lacked 3
indicators, 1- lacked 4 indicators 5 5 4 4.67 0.467

5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%

accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished and 1- below 50%.
4 4 4 4.00 0.400

5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%

accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished, 1- below 50%.
5 4 4 4.33 0.325

5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%

accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished, 1- below 50%. 4 4 4 4.00 0.160
5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%
accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished, 1- below 50%.
4 4 4 4.00 0.160

5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%

accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished, 1- below 50%.
4 3 3 3.33 0.033

Overall Rating for

Accomplishment 4.275

Very Satisfactory

CHARLIE B. CORONADO
PRINCIPAL II
Approving Authority
 Annex F
Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: EUGENIO L. MALLORCA NORDY D. SIASON JR.Name of Rater

Position: School Principal I ASDS Position
Service/Division: Schools Division of Iloilo 31-Mar-16 Date Review
Rating Period: June 2015 to March 2016
ACTUAL RESULT
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RATING
MFOs KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per SCORE
KRA Q E T Ave.
Basic Instructional June to March 10% 5 - NAT Performance and GSA is 130% and above; 4- NAT Performance and GSA is 115-
Education Leadership Accounted for learning outcomes of 129%; 3- NAT performance and GSA is 100-114%; 2- NAT performance and GSA is 51-99%;
Services schools and centers viz-a-viz goals and 1- NAT performance and GSA is 50% and below. 3 4 4 3.67 0.367
targets

June to March 20% 5 - collected, analyzed and utilized data to identify and plan needed interventions;
recommended localized curriculum; organized appropriate class programs, ADM, flexible
learning options and home visitations; 4 - 4 of 5 requirements satisfied; 3- 3 of 5 are
Performed instructional supervision to satisfied; 2- some requirements done without evidences; 1- requirements and reports 4 3 4 3.67 0.733
achieve learning outcomes largely missing

June to March 10% 5- 130% and above teachers provided with evidences; 4 - at least 115-129% teachers
Provided technical assistance to teachers provided with evidences; 3- at least 100-114% of the teachers provided with required
on classroom management, skills and evidences; 2- 51-99% of the teachers with technical assistance; 1- 50% and below of 4 3 4 3.67 0.367
teachers provided with technical assistance
instructional competence

Learning June to March 10% 5-130% and above accomplishment on adherence to child-friendly environment
Environment supported with evidences, 4- lack some minimal requirements, 3- no evidences, 2-
incomplete mechanisms and absence of reports and 1- mechanisms and reports are
Provided safe and child friendly learning missing 5 4 4 4.33 0.433
and school environment for learners

June to March 5% 5-130% and above accomplishment on adherence to DRRM policies of the department,
Conducted DRRM orientation to all 4- lack some minimal requirements, 3- no evidences, 2- incomplete mechanisms and
stakeholders: students and parents of the absence of reports and 1- mechanisms and reports are missing 4 4 4 4.00 0.200
school

June to March
Performed school leadership and
management and operations functions
5% 5- with clear financial management system (with evidences), allocated funds for programs
and school facilities improvement and maintenance, communicated financial obligations,
set-up transparency board and updated liquidations, 4- lacked 1 indicator, 3- lacked 2
indicators, 2- lacked 3 indicators and 1- lacked 4 indicators. 4 4 3 3.67 0.183
 Parents' June to March 15% 5- Has stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan (with evidences), organized programs
Involvement with stakeholders and obtained resources for the school, 4- has mobilization plan and
and occasionally meets stakeholders, 3- lacked resources generated and evidences are
Community Established school and family and missing, 2- Poor mobilization skills and seldom meets with stakeholders, 1- no evidence in
this area 4 4 4 4.00 0.600
Partnership community partnership for performance

June to March 10% 5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%

accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished and 1- below 50%.
Performed data-based strategic planning 4 4 4 4.00 0.400

June to March 5% 5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%

Initiated projects and activities with accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished, 1- below 50%.
5 5 5 5.00 0.250
external funding/ sponsorship

Plus Factor June to March 5% 5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%
Acted as Trainer, Resource Speaker, Focal Person accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished, 1- below 50%.
for technical assistance in the National, Regional 5 5 5 5.00 0.250
and Division level trainings

June to March 2.50% 5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%

accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished, 1- below 50%.
Led the acquisition of the new site for the 5 5 5 5.00 0.125
school

June to March 2.50% 5- 130% percent accomplished, 4- 115%-129% accomplished, 3- 100%-114%

Initiated school-led Remediation Program accomplished, 2- 51% to 99% accomplished, 1- below 50%.
for learners with reading and numeracy 5 5 5 5.00 0.125
difficulties

Overall Rating for

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned Accomplishment 4.033

Very Satisfactory

EUGENIO L. MALLORCA NORDY D. SIASON JR., Ed.D., CESE

School Principal I Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Ratee Rater

MYRNA S. CASTILLO, Ph.D., CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority
 RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outsanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSIO

Final Performance results

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Rater- Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and th

Name of employee ROSEMARIE C.SERVA

Signature

PART IV: DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Strengths Developmental Needs Action Plan (Recommended

Developmental Intervention)

ROSEMARIE C.SERVA CHARLIE B. CORONADO

TEACHER II PRINCIPAL II
(Ratee) (Rater)
OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Rating Adjectival Rating

3.708 Very Satisfactory 0

ntent of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Superior CHARLIE B. CORONADO

Signature

ELOPMENTAL PLANS

lan (Recommended Timeline Resources Needed

opmental Intervention)

ARLIE B. CORONADO
PRINCIPAL II
(Approving Authority)

DepEd RPMS Form for Teachers