CHAPTER 3

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of data gathered in this
study. The data were organized using the tabular and contextual presentation
sequenced on the basis of the sub-problem posed in the study.

Profile of Respondents

Table 1 presents the back ground information about the profile of the Lupon
Tagpamayapa and the Brgy. Officials of Brgy. Tabon, in the province of Surigao del Sur.

Table 1

AGE Frequency Percentage

(30-45YRS OLD) 0 0%
(45-55 YRS. OLD) 9 45%
(55-60 YRS. OLD) 6 30%
(60 YRS AND ABOVE 5 25%
Total 20 100%
The table shows that out of 20 respondents there are 9 or 45 percent of the total
respondents who ranged from 45-55 years old.

Table 1.2

SEX Frequency Percentage

MALE 15 75%
FEMALE 5 25%
Total 20 100%

Table 1.2 shows that 75 percent of the total respondents are male and there are
only 25 percent who are female.
Table 1.3

RELIGION Frequency Percentage

ROMAN CATHOLIC 18 90%
PROTESTANT 2 10%
Total 20 100%

Table 1.3 shows that most of the respondents are Roman Catholic, however 10
percent of the total are Protestant.

Table 1.4

EDUCATIONAL Frequency Percentage

ATTAINMENT
COLLEGE LEVEL 3 15%
COLLEGE GRADUATE 17 85%
Total 20 100%

The table 1.4 shows that 85 percent of the respondents are college graduate
while 15 percent of the total are college level.

Table 1.5

YEARS IN SERVICE Frequency Percentage

LESS THAN 1 YR 5 25%
1-2 YEARS 0 0%
3-4 YEARS 5 25%
5 YEARS AND UP 10 50%
Total 20 100%

Table 1.5 shows that out of 20 respondents 10 of them have a 5 years and up
years in service, while both 25% are 3-4 years and less than 1 year in Years in Service.
TABLE 2 TYPES OF CASE FILED

TYPES OF CASE MEAN VERBAL

INTERPRETATION
A. CRIMINAL CASES
1.Physical injuries 2.7 OFTEN
2.Robbery/Theft 2.55 OFTEN
3. Threats 2.55 OFTEN
4. Slander/Oral defamation 2.4 SELDOM
5. Damage to property 2.5 OFTEN
6. Coercion/Unjust 2.05 OFTEN
vexation
7. Trespassing 2.25 OFTEN
8. Estafa 2 SELDOM
Others( Pls. Specify)
B. CIVIL CASES
9. Collection of debts or 2.4 SELDOM
rental
10. Family/Marital 2.45 OFTEN
relations
11. Demand for specific 2.7 OFTEN
performance of obligation
arising from breach of
contracts
12. Damages 2.1 SELDOM
13. Ejectment 2.2 SELDOM
C. MISCELLANIOUS
CASES
14. Violation of local 2.25 OFTEN
ordinances
15. Labor cases 2.3 SELDOM
16. Boundary disputes 2.75 OFTEN
17. Agrarian cases 2.05 OFTEN
20 100%
Legend:

3.26- 4 ALWAYS

2.51-3.25 OFTEN

1.76-2.50 SELDOM
1-1.75- NEVER

TABLE 2.1 STATUS OF CASE FILED

TYPES OF CASE MEAN VERBAL

INTERPRETATION
D. CRIMINAL CASES
1.Physical injuries 2.75 RESOLVED
2.Robbery/Theft 2.85 RESOLVED
3. Threats 2.9 RESOLVED
4. Slander/Oral defamation 2.85 RESOLVED
5. Damage to property 2.9 RESOLVED
6. Coercion/Unjust 2.9 RESOLVED
vexation
7. Trespassing 2.95 RESOLVED
8. Estafa 2.55 RESOLVED
Others( Pls. Specify)
E. CIVIL CASES
9. Collection of debts or 2.9 RESOLVED
rental
10. Family/Marital 2.7 RESOLVED
relations
11. Demand for specific 2.75 RESOLVED
performance of obligation
arising from breach of
contracts
12. Damages 2.6 RESOLVED
13. Ejectment 2.6 RESOLVED
F. MISCELLANIOUS
CASES
14. Violation of local 2.75 RESOLVED
ordinances
15. Labor cases 2.6 RESOLVED
16. Boundary disputes 2.6 RESOLVED
17. Agrarian cases 2.75 RESOLVED
20 100%

LEGEND

3- Resolved

2- Unresolved
1- Elevated

TABLE 2.2 PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED

Problems encountered by the Mean Verbal Interpretation

Lupon Tagapamayapa
members?
1. Insufficient trainings and 1.9 Mild problems which doesn’t required
seminars. immediate actions
2. Non-compliance of the 1.75 Mild problems which doesn’t required
respondent regarding thee immediate actions
summon.
3. Failure to track or contact the 1.8 Mild problems which doesn’t required
respondent. immediate actions
4. Non- compliance with the 1.65 Mild problems which doesn’t required
agreement made. immediate actions
5. Giving false statements by the 1.45 Mild problems which doesn’t required
complainant or respondents. immediate actions
6. Disorganized the record 1.35 Mild problems which doesn’t required
system. immediate actions
7. Inadequate fund to support 1.45 Mild problems which doesn’t required
and other forms of assistance immediate actions
for the Lupon Tagapamayapa
from the Barangay and other
forms of assistance.
8. Failure to reach the agreement 1.35 Mild problems which doesn’t required
between thecomplainanat and immediate actions
respondents.
9. Unidentified respondents 1.55 Mild problems which doesn’t required
immediate actions
10. Inadequate manpower in 1.5 Mild problems which doesn’t required
Barangay Justice System% immediate actions
20 100%

Legend:

1- Not a problem

2- Mild problem which doesn’t require immediate action

3- Severe problem which requires immediate action

TABLE 2.3 STATEGIES TO IMPROVE BARRANGAY JUSTICE SYSTEM

What are the proposed Mean Verbal Interpretation
strategies that can improve the
Barangay Justce System of
Brgy. Tabon?
1. Conduct training and 2.5 Can significantly help the
developments work on improvements of Brgy.
the Lupon. Justice System.
2. Work in close 2.5 Can significantly help the
coordination with the improvements of Brgy.
barangay council for Justice System.
funding and other
services.
3. Conduct Barangay 2.6 Can significantly help the
Justice System improvements of Brgy.
Information Justice System.
dissemination during the
Barangay Assembly.
4. Use preemptive 2.3 Can help in the
measures to limit improvement of Brgy.
unwanted acts. Justice System

20 100%
Legend:

1- Cannot help in the improvement of Brgy. Justice System,

2- Can help in the improvement of Brgy. Justice System

3- Can significantly help in the improvements of Brgy. Justice System

 CHAPTER 4

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter contains the summary, conclusions, and recommendations of the

study.

SUMMARY

The study assessed the Effectiveness of Lupon Tagapamayapa Implementing

Barangay Justice System of Barangay Tabon, Bislig City in the province of Surigao del

Sur. The data gathered involved descriptive- survey using structures questionnaire and

Focus Group Discussion (FGD) using a grand tour open-ended question. The data were

analyzed using frequency count, percentage distribution, mean, and standard deviation
and one-way analysis of variables (ANOVA). The qualitative data elicited from the FGD

sessions were analyzed contently using the coding technique. The findings of the study

were serve as the basis for developing effectiveness of Lupon Tagapamayapa

implementing Barangay Justice System of Brgy. Tabon.

FINDINGS

On the basis of the data gathered, the following findings are summarized.

1. Out of 20 respondents 45 percent of them have a ranged of 45-55 years

old in terms of age, 15 or 75 percent of the respondents are male and 5 or 25 percent

are the female.

2. Out of 20 respondents 18 or 90 percent of them are Roman Catholic while

2 or 10 percent are Protestant, In terms in Educational Attainment 17 or 85 percent are

College Graduate while 3 or 15 percent are College Level.

3. In Years in Service out of 20 respondents are 10 or 50 percent are having

5 years and up years in service while both 5 or 25 percent are less than 1 year and 3-4

years in service.

4. In types of case 26.8 or 57 percent of case filed are mostly encountered,

on the other hand the status of case filed have 100 percent are resolved cased.

5. In problem encountered by the Lupon Tagapamayapa, all of them they

have mild problems which doesn’t required actions.

 6.

Recommendations

1. Conduct more training to enhance their skills in solving problems as well

as for the settlements of good two parties.

2. Conduct Barangay Justice System information dissemination during the

barangay assembly.

3. Upgrade their facilities to make their work easier.