Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Theory
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 25TH, 2010 | COMMENTS OFF | SHARE:
If you haven’t noticed it yet, most leadership theories build on the previous one. In the
same manner, situational leadership theory builds upon contingency theory. Where
contingency theory asserts that certain leaders work best in certain environments
because of their leadership style, situational leadership theory argues that any leader
can work best in any environment by changing their style accordingly.
In the time since its inception, situational leadership II has become a standard model
for use in training managers and leaders. The situational approach is effective and
provides a prescription for leadership success rather than merely describing why certain
leaders work in certain situations. In this way, situational leadership theory further
eroded the notion of, “one best way” of leadership. Despite a broad base of support from
trainers and consultants, situational leadership theory lacks a significant body of
research-based support. While situational leadership considers the followers in
determining leadership style, it does so on a one-on-one basis and does not provide
guidelines on how to use the model when leading group.
The situational leadership theory refers to those leaders
who adopt different leadership styles according to the
situation and the development level of their team members.
It is an effective way of leadership because it adapts to the
team’s needs and sets a beneficial balance for the whole
organization.
The best known situational leadership model in the field of
psychology and HR is the one established by Paul Hersey
and Ken Blanchard. These two experts established two
basic levels of leadership behavior:
1. Management: The managerial behavior of the leader is
focused on the definition of tasks. The what, when and
how to perform them is established.