Performance Indicators

Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Rarely showed 2 2 2 2 0.15
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was prompt and clear
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown communication of
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as guardians as shown
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV in the MOV
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted any 1 of

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was the given MOV
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV was
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was completed in only 1
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown quarter
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Occasionally 3 3 3.000 0.300
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was performed various
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV process as shown in
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted 2 different
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was kinds of acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 3.637
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MICHAEL P. TING NANCY FE. O. CABARLE MARIA CRISELDA S. GESTIADA
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: MICHAEL P. TING

Position: JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: STA. RITA HIGH SCHOOL - OLONGAPO CITY
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 - APRIL 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 4
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4
Objective 3 7.5% 4
Objective 4 7.5% 4
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4
Objective 6 7.5% 4
Objective 7 7.5% 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5
Objective 9 7.5% 4
Objective 10 7.5% 3
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 3
Objective 12 7.5% 2
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 3

MICHAEL P. TING NANCY FE O. CABARLE

Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ient Teacher)

Name of Rater: NANCY FE O. CABARLE

Position: HEAD TEACHER I
Date of Review: Apr-19

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
5 5.000 0.375
3 3.500 0.262
3 3.000 0.225
3 3 3.000 0.225
2 2 2.000 0.150
3 3.000 0.300
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 3.637

NCY FE O. CABARLE MARIA CRISELDA S. GESTIADA

Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FOR

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other
MOV given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action
conduct and application disseminated action research with
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the
research report research report
within the rating within the rating
period period

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
 Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3

more lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom
management of management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
environments.environm Efficiency
ents. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
 Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3
least 4 lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the
differentiated, in the department or
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3

collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the
selection, organization, in the selection, selection,
development and use of organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3

teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown
requirements. in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data assessment data
support learner as shown in the as shown in the
7.5%
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3
different types of of the same kind of
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the
of learner needs, effective effective
progress and communication of communication of
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and
stakeholders, including progress to progress to
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3

of the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3
different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory 0
below 1.499 Poor Ratee
ENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

NNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was
applications of applications of shown
content knowledge content knowledge
within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 6 of 5
Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 from colleagues colleagues and
and supported by supported by any 1
any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given given

Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

research with research with evidence was
colleagues colleagues shown

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV MOV evidence was
shown
Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating shown
period period

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
 strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and supported by any of
supported by any 1 the other MOV
of the other MOV given
given

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Modeled and Modeled and evidence was
shared effective shared effective shown
classroom classroom
management management
strategies that strategies that
engage learners inengage learners in
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
done in different done in different
physical learning physical learning
environments as environments as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6with a rating of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted 2
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
and constructive and constructive evidence was
behavior behavior shown
management skills management skills
by applying positive by applying positive
and non-violent and non-violent
discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
 Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
lessons lesson

Worked with Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
with others with others

Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV with others

Developed and Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies showing strategies showing shown
developmentally- developmentally-
sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the other
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner learner feedback as
feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
 Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
in the selection, selection, shown
organization, organization,
development and development and
appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

reviewed collaboratively evidence was
collaboratively assessment tools shown
assessment tools with colleagues as
with colleagues as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
interpretation of assessment data
assessment data as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV shown

Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
effective communication of shown
communication of learner needs and
learner needs and progress to
progress to parents/ guardians
parents/ guardians as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

MOV MOV

Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted
Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

0 Approving Authority
Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IP
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teache

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeric

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

0 0
Ratee Rater
REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

0 NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority