Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4


Pakistan’s worst ever flooding disaster has damaged twenty percent area of the country, which is roughly
equal to the size of England. It affected twenty million peoples, intensified the energy crisis and may
create fears of social unrest in the near future.

This humanitarian disaster left more than five million people homeless and around ten million in urgent
need of humanitarian aid. According to the United Nations, the disaster has affected close to 20 million
people, killing 1,600 and leaving 1.2 million homes damaged or destroyed.

It is worth mentioning that most disastrous aspect of the river’s floods is not its immediate effects; its
after effects are considered much severe than its immediate damages. Earthquakes and tsunamis damage
suddenly the human life on earth, but river floods are considered as slow tsunami because they affect the
human life more severely when flooding crisis is over. For instance flood along Yangtze River in China in
1931 left 1.4 million people dead by drowning; while ultimately this number had reached 3.7 million
because of diseases and starvation.

Apart from the human losses, the worst ever disaster in Pakistan is threatening to disrupt the economy.
Though, it is too early to estimate the economic cost of the devastating floods at this stage as waves of
floodwaters may bring more destruction.

In comparison of magnitudes of human casualties and economic losses, the worst ever disaster in Pakistan
seems a less devastating; its severe problematic aspect is its timing and the socio-economic
characteristics of the region affected by the flood. Majority of the poor in Pakistan lives in flood affected
areas. Big urban business tycoons or financial houses are not its direct sufferers; it directly hits the areas
where majority of the people under the absolute poverty is living.

This was the time when they were expecting to earn their long waiting annual income by sale of cotton,
sugarcane and other seasonal crops and they were planning to start the cultivation of wheat in the coming
month. The crisis during the holy month of Ramazan and before celebrating Eid-ul-Fitr will further deepen
the social and psychological problems in the poor regions of Pakistan.

It is notable that the production and distribution of cotton has a pivotal role in the economy of Pakistan.
It is not only a part of economic strategy, but has its social dimensions. Rural population in cotton and
sugarcane growing areas prepares its annual schedules of social activities with consideration of expected
cash flows. Those cash flows are received twice in a year: after the sale of wheat and cotton crops.

In the rural Pakistan, sale and purchase of assets, date of marriages, social functions and gatherings,
home construction, stock of consumable goods, purchase of consumer durables, redemption of loans,
funding for education and the purchase of jewellery and clothes are based on the receipts of income from
cotton, sugarcane, rice and wheat crops.

When income from crops goes into the pockets of the growers, they transfer it into banks and retailers of
urban areas. The demand for consumers’ goods in the urban areas increases at the end of crop seasons
and income of the traders and manufacturers of durable and consumers’ goods increases. This is the basic
simultaneity in the domestic economy of Pakistan. Unfortunately, flood damaged this simultaneity.

MACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS Several methods and techniques are available in economic literature to
quantify the economic losses by flooding. ‘HAZUS-MH Flood Loss Estimation Methodology’, Loss of Life
Estimation Risk Assessment System’, GIS-Based distributed techniques’, ‘Elsevier Mathematical Model’,
and ‘Input-Output method’ are included in these techniques. ‘HAZUS-MH Flood Loss Estimation
Methodology’ is based on estimated property damage.
This model estimates shelter needs and direct and indirect economic losses arising from floods. ‘Loss of
life estimation in flood risk assessment’ method estimates economic losses on the basis of loss of life due
to flood. ‘GIS-based distributed technique for assessing economic losses from flood’ is another method to
estimate economic losses by floods; this method is more appropriate where industrial assets were
damaged because of flood.

‘Elsevier Mathematical Model’ is used for rapid estimation of economic losses by floods in the urban
catchments. ‘Input-output method’ and the ‘Aggregate Macroeconomic Cost Estimation’ are the other
possible techniques to estimate the economic losses by floods. All these methods have been used to
assess the economic losses in different times in various regions.

The basic problem with the available estimation techniques is that they cannot be used at the earlier
stage because non-availability of required data. However, an approximation has been attempted to get
some idea of the economic impact of present flooding in the country.

Government officials have estimated only public sector infrastructure losses, which range from $10 to $15
billion, which the country will have to spare for rehabilitating and reconstructing of the infrastructure.
The donor organisations, including World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and the United Nations, are also
measuring the economic impact of the floods. All sources are agreed that Pakistan’s economy would likely
grow slower than predicted because of the extent of the damage caused by the flooding. According to the
Asian Development Bank’s estimates, now Pakistan is unlikely to meet its 4.5 percent economic growth
rate target.

It is noteworthy that after recording its lowest growth in a decade, GDP had been expected to grow by
4.5 per cent in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011. Now, it was assessed that Pakistan could achieve
about 3.5 percent GDP growth rate this fiscal year. It means a loss of around two billion dollars in terms
of GDP. This loss does not include the losses of assets and properties.

Agriculture accounts for 20 percent of Pakistan’s gross domestic product (GDP). Flood has damaged crops
sown over 1.93 million acres. It estimated crop loss at one billion dollars, saying the full impact on soil
erosion and agriculture could only be assessed when the water recedes around mid-September. The
country has lost around 20 percent of its cotton crops.

The destruction of cotton, rice, sugarcane, vegetable crops and fish farms are enormous as well. Damage
to cotton, rice, sugarcane and maize will hit the export sector, the main source for Pakistan’s foreign
exchange reserves. Textiles and agriculture account for about three quarters of Pakistan’s 21 billion
dollar export target this year. The floods have eaten about 20 percent of the cotton crop (14 million bales
for this year). It may negatively affect large-scale manufacturing and exports by 25 percent.

The tragedy will strain the government’s finances in different ways. Before the crisis, the budget deficit
was expected to reach at 4.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but now it could widen to as
much as 6 percent to 7 percent of GDP. Obviously to fulfil IMF conditionality in term of Budget Deficit to
GDP ratio is not possible in the present situation. The higher fiscal deficit would lead to increase
government borrowing. The crisis of external debt will become more serious.

It may be noted that the government is planning to launch convertible bonds to collect money to finance
the loss making business entities in public sector. According to the Privatisation Commission’s feasibility,
after investment of the funds raised by these convertible bonds, the loss making institutions would
become profitable.

This strategic move at the time of present crisis gives signals that government is intending to transfer the
funds from the previously announced bail out package to the flood relief fund, and the gap will be filled
by the issuance of convertible bonds. However, the assumption of transforming the loss making
institutions into profit earning centers is questionable. This is against the history of the public sector
business entities in Pakistan.
Those institutions have been consuming huge public funds, but their crises have always been becoming
more severe. Moreover, the successful launching of those bonds in the present state of affairs is against
the economic rationale. Moody’s Investors Service, which had expected Pakistan’s economic growth to
expand to 4.5 percent this fiscal year, may lower its estimate.

An upgrading in Pakistan’s credit rating in coming months is unlikely due to the devastation from the
floods and its fiscal effects, but the country’s current ‘B3′ rating “adequately captures the risk” of the
likely economic slowdown. A ‘B3′ rating is just one stage above the ‘C level’ while a ‘C level’ rating
indicates sovereign default of the country.

However, positive inflow of foreign direct and portfolio investment and subscription of Pakistan’s bond at
abroad are the indicators that foreign investors do not have any apprehension about default risk. It is a
sign that investors anticipate IMF and US support to prevent any fiscal crisis. Pakistan’s equity market
index (KSE-100) is in line with other emerging market indexes.

The average magnitude of foreign remittance in recent years is around 10 percent of GDP, however it is
strongly expected that it may rise to help the families at home by the expatriate Pakistanis. Before the
floods, the country had a healthy foreign exchange reserve of 16.45 billion dollars, though these reserves
were achieved by IMF rescue package to save Pakistan from balance of payment crisis.

Losses of public and private assets and properties: There is no doubt that the flooding in Pakistan will
inflict serious damage on the present economic growth, pubic finances and socio-economic conditions,
but the long-term effects will come from the damages assets and properties. Floods have inflicted
widespread damage on infrastructure. In cities, floodwaters have destroyed electricity installations, roads
and phone lines.

The shutting down of one major gas field and six power plants will compound the consumer’s misery by
adding another 1500 MW to the already 4500 MW of power shortfall. The total number of bridges, roads
and railway tracks washed away will be calculated when the crisis will be over. The quantification of
losses in communication sector is currently impractical. The World Bank, which has announced a 900
million dollar loan for Pakistan, expects the economic impact to be huge, indicating that direct damage
was greatest in housing, roads, irrigation and agriculture.

According to an estimate, the reconstruction in northern areas alone could cost 2.5 billion dollars.
According to the Director General of the Pakistan Electric Power Company, they faced losses of more than
four billion rupees (47 million dollars) due to the floods with some grid stations wiped out, while around
1000 villages in flood-hit districts of southern Punjab are without power, where two grid stations are
badly affected. The installations of new poles, wires and feeders are required.

The losses of assets and properties in private sector includes housing, business premises, livestock, dairy
farms, fish forms, agriculture lands, crops of cotton, rice, sugarcane, maize, fruits, vegetables, domestic
appliances, installations, furniture, fixtures and uncountable domestic assets and consumer durables.

Effects on poverty and regional imbalances: No financial compensation is possible for these great
private losses. Even no mechanism is possible to verify and quantify these private losses. Such losses have
a long-term social cost. They may change the economic ranking of the families which will create social
and economic complication and restructuring in the society.

The huge economic losses can lead the massive unemployment, hyper-inflation and social unrest. The
huge loss of food items and livestock will lead to higher inflation. Prices of vegetables, fruits, cloth, milk
and meet can be accelerated. The floods are likely to push up food prices and transportation costs for
other goods, so further increase in inflation is expected. It is an important aspect that reconstruction
activities will lead the unusual increase in the cost of construction materials including steel, cement and
other relevant accessories.
It is also an important aspect of the present crisis that this may further enhance the regional imbalances,
because this damaged the economy of those regions which are already in underdeveloped and belong to
economically depressed areas. The losses of income and business assets are the basic cause of
unemployment, while unemployment along with inflation may add further poverty in the region where
majority of poor is residing.

If policy measures are not taken, the enhancing poverty will not be limited up to the flood affected areas
it will be transformed ultimately to the urban centers, because inflation led by the shortage of food items
and mobility of peoples in search of employment will affect the entire country.

Effects on charity institutions and urban poverty: In the last, two important implications of present
crisis are considerable. Fairly a large number of urban poor, needy persons and white collars wait for the
holy month of Ramazan on the hope of their help by the affluent peoples in the form of charity and Zakat.
Their entire annual activities are based on the inflow of funds during this month. Many humanitarian and
welfare organisations and NGOs expect the extraordinary jump in their collection of funds for charitable

It is very much likely that their expectations will be badly hit at this stage of abnormality, particularly
when accelerating inflation and shrinking in economic activities badly damaged the economic status of a
large number of urban households. This situation may further deepen the crisis and social unrest.

The justifiable utilisation and genuine transfer of the funds collected from the general public in the name
of flood affected peoples is another important concern. Thousands of the political and non-political
groups are busy in collection of cash and goods for flood affected peoples in every town and street. There
is no possibility to create transparency in the collection and distribution of those public funds.

Helping the needy peoples by own pockets is not questionable, but utilisation and transfer of those funds
which have been collected from general public must be questionable. They must be audited. Particularly,
transparency and audit is required when big political parties, large NGOs, trade organisations, and
business associations are competing and claiming for their role in human welfare activities. Their certified
rankings may lead a positive and transparent environment.

My name is Saeed Waheed Murad and I have applied for Verona Fair 2010 to the Italian
Embassy Islamabad to get visa and in this regard my passport No. AB0975602 is lying with
Italian Embassy. The event datee were 29 th 2nd of October and the dates have already been
passed. My passport is still lying with you and I have a plan to go to Saudi Arabia to perform
pilgrimage/Hajj. Sir, as you are well aware that I cannot apply for visa unless I have a passport
which is in your with your The Verona Fair is approaching near and date of the event is 29th
September 2010 and I have to manage travel and other formailities, If you grant visa to me. It is
therefore requested that Visa procedure may kindly be expedited so that I should arrange my
travel plan.