Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
It should be resolved that our present administration should not reintroduce death
penalty as punishment for criminals in our society. Our government should not look
into it as an option in punishing individuals who have done wrong in the society.
Our society should re-think their position about this matter since it would not only
affect this generation but also the generations to come. Death penalty should not be
an option, and ultimately it should not be a solution to the crimes committed by
individuals. Individuals who have erred in the society should not be sentenced to
death; as if we are saying that all hope of changing is lost because of their societal
defects.
Nevertheless, on the other hand, those who are in favor of this kind of system say
that these criminalities we specifically describe as heinous crimes should result into
death penalty, since these crimes are gravely heavy that brought trauma, emotional
damages, and psychological damages to those who were victimized. Rape for
example is a heinous crime that numerous individuals have done; sexually torturing
other individuals is indeed grotesque and inhuman; it is heinous and should not be
allowed of impunity, since if we allow impunity we would commit a great injustice
towards those who were victimized by the rapist. Justice should be served in all
means necessary, since the victim was forced by all means by the criminal. These
kinds of criminals should be punished, and punished without any consideration of
morality since they have done the crime without moral constraints. Death penalty is
a just punishment for them and it should be done without moral constraints since
they have done the deed without moral constrains, and this is how justice should be
served.
When we say that death penalty is a necessary evil, it is an evil that would bring
good to the whole society despite that its essence of evil manifests. Nevertheless, it
would only victimize individuals, and these individuals whom I am referring to are
those individuals who are living in depraved economic conditions. The economically
deprived individuals in our society would be the inevitable and the most vulnerable
victims of this system of punishment, since they do not have means to protect
themselves unlike those individuals who are economically privileged that could
summon the best of lawyers that could defend them from any legal suits that are
against them. When death penalty was still in effect in the past, the number of
criminality statistically did not decrease, this then is neither a necessary evil for the
society because it didn’t help in decreasing the number of criminality nor it is a way
of teaching Filipinos, it only inculcated the consciousness of a punitive and barbaric
society. Death penalty is neither a showcase of justice nor a tool that give educative
value to Filipinos; it is only a tool that would instil fear.
I do not think that Filipinos are lacking in fear when it comes to be judged according
to the law, since I believe that we as Filipinos are in nature fearing and respectful of
laws. I believe that Filipinos neither lack fear nor lack respect of the law; I stand on
the claim that Filipinos are lacking in comprehension of the law, and that death
penalty is the easiest way to force Filipinos to respect and obey the laws. We only
fear and respect something that is known to us; individuals would dare do things
that they don’t know to be dangerous, since they haven’t comprehended nor
experienced the cause of the pain produced by the action. It would take
comprehension of laws to respect laws. Our government should instil educative and
moral values that lead to the respect and obedience to the law, and not instil fear.