Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: Gear is one of the most important machine elements in mechanical power transmission system. It is a rotating machine part
having cut tooth which meshes with another tooth part in order to transmit torque. The application of gears has a wide range starting
from tiny wrist watch to huge heavy machinery such as automobile, aerospace industry and marine engines due to its high degree of
reliability and compactness. Spur gears have straight tooth and are parallel to the axis of the wheel. The bending stress and total
deformation of gear tooth is considered to be the paramount objective of for modern gear design. A pair of spur gear tooth in action is
generally subjected to two types of cyclic stress, contact stress and bending stress including fatigue. In this paper, the contact stress
analysis of stainless steel spur gear by theoretical method using Hertz equation and Finite element analysis using ANSYS 16.0
workbench. The present work is an attempt to find root bending stress distribution, maximum allowable contact stress and total
deformation of a stainless steel spur gear tooth.
Keywords: Stainless Steel Spur Gear, Static load, Contact Stress, Bending Stress, Total Deformation, ANSYS Workbench 16.0
www.ijsea.com 208
International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications
Volume 7–Issue 08,208-213, 2018, ISSN:-2319–7560
The line tangent to the pitch circles is termed the pitch line.
The line perpendicular to the surfaces of the teeth at the
contact point is termed the pressure line or line of contact.
www.ijsea.com 209
International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications
Volume 7–Issue 08,208-213, 2018, ISSN:-2319–7560
20˚ full depth spur gear made of stainless steel transmitting If the material of both cylinders are the same, then the moduli
torque at 10 kW power with 3000rpm. of elasticity and poisson’s ratio will be equal. Substituting E1
= E2 = E and μ1 = μ2 = μ in eq.(iii),
Table 2. Specification of Spur Gear Tooth
σc2 =
(iv)
Now applying this equation to a pair of spur gear teeth in
contact, replacing the radii r1 and r2 by the radii of curvature at
the pitch point.
r1 = and r2 =
where dpp = pitch circle diameter of pinion
dpg = pitch circle diameter of gear
Since the pinion and gear have equal geometry in all respects
as given in table 2, therefore
dpp = dpg = dp,
r1 = and r2 =
σc = 0.6792
(vii)
From table 3 modulus of elasticity E = 193000MPa and
substitute in (vii),
3.1 Theoretical Calculation
3.1.1 Contact stress calculation using Hertz σc = 0.6792
Equation
Earle Buckingham(1926) used the Hertz theory to determine σc = 298.386
the contact stress between a pair of teeth while transmitting
(viii)
power by treating the pair of teeth in contact as cylinders of
radii equal to the radii of curvature of the mating involutes at from (v) r= =
the pitch point. According to Hertz theory, when the two
cylinders are pressed together, the contact stress is given by,
Therefore σc = 298.386
σc (i)
(ix)
B= (ii)
Now, F = where Ft is the tangential component of the
resultant force F between two meshing teeth. Substitute this
where σc = maximum value of contact stress (N/mm2) value in (ix),
F = force pressing two cylinders together (N)
B = half width of deformation (mm)
L = axial length of cylinders (mm) σc = 298.386
d1, d2 = diameters of two cylinders (mm)
(x)
E1, E2 = moduli of elasticity of two cylinder
Also the axial length L is equal to the face width b of spur
materials (N/mm2)
gears, therefore replacing L by b in (x),
μ1,μ2 = poisson’s ratio of materials
Substituting the value of half width of deformation B in
equation(i) and squaring both sides, σc = 298.386
(xi)
Equation (xi) is the general mathematical model for
σc2 = evaluating the contact stress for a pair of stainless steel spur
gear teeth in contact, for the equal geometry and dimensions
(iii) of pinion and gear in mesh.
www.ijsea.com 210
International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications
Volume 7–Issue 08,208-213, 2018, ISSN:-2319–7560
Considering the power to be transmitted P = 10 kW and the The tolerance factor ϕ is given by,
rotational speed of the pinion np = 3000 rpm, the tangential
ϕ = m + 0.25
component of force can be obtained from;
where m = module, dp = pitch circle diameter
P= (xii)
for top precision as grade 1;
Where T is transmitting torque in N-mm. e = 2ep = 2eg = 2(0.8 + 0.06ϕ ) = 2.6486×10-3 mm
=> T = 31831 N-mm from eq.(xv) the dynamic load Fd = 1850.15 N
Also Ft = and from table 2, dp = 120 mm Fts = 1918.517 N > Fd = 1850.15 N
Therefore, the design is safe from surface durability
=> Ft = 530.517 N
consideration.
Again b = 54 mm , ϕ = 20˚ and rp = 60 mm are substituted in
(xi) σc = 212.98 MPa 3.2 Assumption of Lewis Equation
Allowable maximum contact stress,
The analysis of bending stress in gear tooth was done by Mr.
σc,all = where S.F is safety factor. Wilfred Lewis in his paper, ‘The investigation of the strength
Taking S.F as 2.736, σc,all = 77.84 MPa of gear tooth’ submitted at the Engineers club of Philadelphia
Again from eq.(xi) in 1892. Even today, the Lewis equation is considered as the
basic equation in the design of gears. Lewis considered gear
tooth as a cantilever beam with static normal force F applied
σc = 298.386 at the tip. Assumptions made in the derivation are:
1. The full load is applied to the tip of a single tooth in static
condition.
Ft = brpsinϕcosϕ
2. The radial component is negligible.
(xiii) 3. The load is distributed uniformly across the full face width.
Replacing σc by the maximum allowable Hertz stress σH 4. Forces due to tooth sliding friction are negligible.
in(xii), the tooth surface strength of pinion is; 5. Stress concentration in the tooth fillet is negligible.
Fts = brpsinϕcosϕ
(xiv)
The maximum allowable Hertz stress for stainless steel spur
gears is 405.015 N/mm2.
Fts = 1918.527 N
For the design to be safe, the tooth surface strength F ts must
be greater than the dynamic load on gear tooth F d. The
dynamic load on gear tooth is given by;
Fd =
(xv) Figure 6. Force on a gear tooth
Where v = pitch line velocity (m/s) In the above Figure 3.1, the following notations are used: F is
C = deformation factor (N/mm2) the Full load, Fr and Ft are the Radial and Tangential
e = sum of error between two meshing teeth (mm) component of the full load, h, b and t are the height, face-
b = face width of tooth (mm) width and thickness of the tooth at critical section
Ft = tangential component of force (N) respectively.
The deformation factor C is given by,
C= 3.2.1 Calculation of Bending Stress
In calculation of bending stress of tooth we consider the
where k = 0.111 constant depending on form of tooth Lewis assumption as discussed above in 3.2. From the Figure
C = 10711.5 N/mm2 3 at point ‘a’
Bending moment Mb = Ft * h (1)
Area moment of inertia I = bt3/12 (2)
Pitch line velocity v = ; n = 3000 rpm and Then the bending stress is given by σb=
dp = 120mm, v = 18.84 m/s
from the Eq. (1) and Eq. (2). After the rearranging we have
The error e is a function of the quality of the gear and the
method of manufacturing. There are twelve different grades of
Ft = b*σb* (3)
gears as listed in table 4.
Multiplying numerator and denominator by module (m) from
Table 4. Tolerances on the adjacent pitch
the Eq. (3) we have the tangential component of the force is
rewritten as Ft =m ∗ b ∗ σ ∗ Y (5)
When the tangential force increased the stress also increases.
When the stress reaches the permissible magnitude of bending
www.ijsea.com 211
International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications
Volume 7–Issue 08,208-213, 2018, ISSN:-2319–7560
4. STATIC ANALYSIS
4.1 Meshing
Meshing is basically the division of the entire model into
small cell so that at each and every cell the equations are
solved. It gives the accurate solution and also improves the
quality of solution. Here the element size of 1 mm with Figure 10. Distribution of Equivalent (Von Mises) stress
medium smoothing is considered for mesh generation.
.
www.ijsea.com 212
International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications
Volume 7–Issue 08,208-213, 2018, ISSN:-2319–7560
FEAGitin
[1] provides results
M Maitra, Spurthat
gear,are comparable
Handbook with
of Gear theoretical
Design,
2nd ed. New
analysis Delhi,
results India,
as was McGraw
in the contactHill Education,
stress analysisISBN:
of spur gears
0-07-460237-3, 2010, Ch.
in the present study. FEA02,cansec.2.25,
predictpp.2.99-2.100.
whether a product will
[2] http:/ coewww.rutgers.edu/classes/mae488/hw/lectures
break, wear out, or work the way it was designed. Hence, FEA
/gear/gear.htm
can prove very helpful in the product development process by
[3] http://nptel.ac.in/courses/112106137/pdf/2_7.pdf.
forecasting
[4] its behavior in operation. A number of research
http://www.gizmology.net/gears.htm.
studies
[5] have been carried
Kailash.C.Bhosale, out inofthe
Analysis contextstrength
bending of spurofgear
the using
helical gear
different by fem,
types The international
of materials. institute
An extended for science,
version of the above
technology
work basedand on education (iiste),Volume
the same software can also2, No 4, 2011,out for the
be carried
analysis of shear stress between two mating gears.
6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Special deep thanks to teacher Dr. Theingi (Rector) for
encouraging me to make this paper and her kind support and
valuable suggestions. We also wish to thank HOD and all the
faculty members of mechanical engineering department for their
constant help and patient understanding.
7. REFERENCES
[1] Gitin M Maitra, Spur gear, Handbook of Gear Design,
2nd ed. New Delhi, India, McGraw Hill Education, ISBN:
0-07-460237-3, 2010, Ch. 02, sec.2.25, pp.2.99-2.100.
[2] Bhandari, V. B. Design of machine elements. Tata McGraw-
Hill Education,2010
[3] http://nptel.ac.in/courses/112106137/pdf/2_7.pdf.
[4] http://www.gizmology.net/gears.htm.
[5] Kailash.C.Bhosale, Analysis of bending strength of the
helical gear by fem, The international institute for science,
technology and education (iiste),Volume 2, No 4, 2011,
ISSN 2222-1727(Paper) ISSN 2222-2871
[6] Khurmi, R.S., 1997. “Theory of machine”. Khanna
publication.
[7] Rattan, S.S., 1998. “theory of machines”. Dhanpat rai
publication.
[8] R.S. Khurmi, J.K. Gupta, Spur gear, A Text Book of Machine
Design, S. Chand, Eurasia Publishing House (pvt.) ltd., 2005.
[9] S. Baud, P.Velex, Static and dynamic tooth loading in spur
and helical geared systems experiments and model
validation, Journal of Mechanical Design, 124(2), 2002, pp.
334–346.
[10] Shubham A. Badkas and NimishAjmera, Static and
dynamic analysis of spur gear, International Journal
of Mechanical Engineering & Technology (IJMET), Volume
7, Issue 4, July–Aug 2016, pp.8–21.
[11] Sunil Kumar, K.K. Mishra, JatinderMadan, Stress analysis
of spur gear using fem method, National Conference of
Advancements and Futuristic Trends in Mechanical and
Material Engineering, Feb 19-20.2010.
[12] V.Rajaprabakaran, Mr.R.Ashokraj, Spur gear tooth stress
analysis and stress reduction, IOSR Journal of Mechanical
and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), e-ISSN: 2278-1684,
ISSN: 2320-334X,pp.38-48.
www.ijsea.com 213