Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
For permission to copy or republish, contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104
RADIATION ENHANCEMENT BY NONEQUILIBRIUM I N EARTH'S AW3SPqERE
Chul Park*
NASA Ames Kesearch C e n t e r , M o f f e t t F i e l d , C a l i f o r n i a
v
Abs t r a c t r a t e s f o r c h e m i c a l l y e q u i l i b r i u m f l o w s have been
improved g r e a t l y i n t h e r e c e n t y e a r s , m o s t l y
The s t a t u s of k n m l e d g e of s h o c k - l a y e r r a d i a - because of P r o j e c t Galileo.
t i o n i n t h e l o w - d e n s i t y , n a n e q u i l i b r i u m regime, as
a p p r o p r i a t e t o t h e f l i g h t of t h e proposed aero- The purpose of t h e p r e s e n t two-part p a p e r is
a s s i s t e d o r b i t a l t r a n s f e r v e h i c l e , i s surveyed. t o s u r v e y t h e S t a t u s of knowledge of r a d i a t i o n in
The e x i s t i n g l a b o r a t o r y d a t a and t h e f l i g h t d a t a t h e n o n e q u i l i b r i u m regime t h a t is a p p r o p r i a t e t o
from A p a l l o and Fire are s c r u t i n i z e d . Nonequilib- t h e f l i g h t of AOTV's. I n t h e f i r s t P a r t , t h e prob-
rium r a d i a t i o n is found t o b e s i g n i f i c a n t i n t h e l e m is examined from t h e programmatic and e m p i r i c a l
f l i g h t regime of t h e v e h i c l e , b u t a f a c t o r of 3 p o i n t s of view. To do s o , t h e reasons why AOTV's
u n c e r t a i n t y i s found i n i t s magnitude. The avail- must f l y i n t h e low-density regimes a r e f i r s t
a b l e t h e o r e t i c a l models a r e reviewed, t h e i r weak- d e l i n e a t e d . The e s s e n t i a l f i n d i n g s of t h e l a b o r a -
nesses a r e p o i n t e d o u t . a computer code t h a t tory s t u d i e s 0f.nonequilibrium radiation f o r the
a p p r o x i m a t e l y r e p r o d u c e s t h e e x i s t i n g d a t a is i n t r o - l o w - d e n s i t y regime are then reviewed, and t h e
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES on July 30, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-410
3
s t a g n a t i o n p o i n t , c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o a P r a n d t l number q u a l i t a t i v e l y , why t h e c a l o r i m e t e r s and r a d i o m e t e r s
of a b o u t 0.01. Such a low P r a n d t l number o c c u r s measured a p p r o x i m a t e l y t h e same h e a t f l u x e s .
o n l y a t t h e v e r y edge of t h e boundary l a y e r f o r an
e q u i l i b r i u m flow; however, as t e m p e r a t u r e f a l l s Using t h e a b l a t i o n r a t e s so o b t a i n e d , t h e
toward t h e w a l l , t h e P r a n d t l number r a p i d l y boundary-layer f l o w s are s o l v e d f o r Apollo 4 in t h e d
increases toward 0.72. Hence, t h e boundary-layer same manner as f o r F i r e 1. I n F i g . l o b , t h e
p r o f i l e can b e determined a p p r o x i m a t e l y by a s s m i n g e n t h a l p y p r o f i l e s so o b t a i n e d are shown f o r a n
P r t o be 0.72. A s shown i n F i g . l o a , t h e edge of a l t i t u d e of 7 3 . 5 km. A s seen i n F i g . l o b , t h e
t h e e q u i l i b r i u m boundary l a y e r e x t e n d s almost t o flowing l a y e r o c c u p i e s a major p o r t i o n of t h e t o t a l
t h e shock wave i n t h i s case. shock-layer t h i c k n e s s , b o t h f o r t h e e q u i l i b r i u m and
n o n e q u i l i b r i u m cases. As was t r u e f o r Fire 1 (Fig.
A t t h e d e n s i t y regime of t h e f l i g h t of F i r e 1, l o a ) . t h e frozen-flow boundary l a y e r e x t e n d s beyond
however, i t is l i k e l y t h a t t h e boundary-layer f l o w t h e shock wave. One c o n c l u d e s , t h e r e f o r e , t h a t t h e
was c h e m i c a l l y f r o z e n . Hence, e l e c t r o n s p r e s e n t a t n o n e q u i l i b r i u m r a d i a t i o n must have been s e v e r e l y
t h e edge of t h e boundary l a y e r must have d i f f u s e d t r u n c a t e d a t t h e h i g h a l t i t u d e s f o r t h e Apollo
toward t h e w a l l through t h e boundary l a y e r . Assum- f l i g h t s a l s o . One notes here a l s o t h a t such a t h i c k
i n g t h a t t h e w a l l was f u l l y c a t a l y t i c t o elQCtrOn a b l a t i o n l a y e r c o u l d have absorbed t h e r a d i a t i o n
recombination, t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f e l e c t r o n s i n b e f o r e i t reached t h e w a l l . The blowing l a y e r
t h e boundary l a y e r would v a r y smoothly from t h e a b s o r p t i o n can e x p l a i n t h e h y s t e r e s i s phenomenon
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES on July 30, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-410
d e n s i t y regime of concern. By a s s m i n g t h e r a d i a - = -d do
t i o n t a be o p t i c a l l y - t h i n , g a s l u m i n o s i t y is dx ( P D E) + Rf - R, (2)
underestimated. The o p t i c a l d e p t h o f n o n e q u i l i b -
rium r a d i a t i o n i n t h e end-on d i r e c t i o n toward t h e Here P , u, and D a r e d e n s i t y , v e l o c i t y , and d i f -
w a l l i n a shock l a y e r is s m a l l e r t h a n 1 5 cm ( t y p i - f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t , and Rf and Rr are t h e forward
c a l l y a b o u t 1 cm), and hence t h e o p t i c a l - t h i n n e s s and r e v e r s e chemical r a t e , r e s p e c t i v e l y . Eleven
a p p r o x i m a t i o n h o l d s closer. The p r o c e d u r e adopted chemical s p e c i e s (N2. 02, N , 0, NO, q,
0::. N+, 0+,
r e s u l t s , t h e r e f o r e , in an u n d e r e s t i m a t i o n of t h e NO+, and e - ) must b e accounted f o r i n t h e AOTV
t r u e r a d i a t i v e h e a t f l u x i n t o t h e b l u n t body. T h i s f l i g h t regime, and a t l e a s t 20 chemical r e a c t i o n s
u n d e r e s t i m a t i o n of r a d i a t i o n i s more pronounced a t occur s i g n i f i c a n t l y among t h e s e s p e c i e s i n t h a t
t h e l o w shock v e l o c i t i e s where i o n i z a t i o n is regime. The r e a c t i o n - r a t e c o e f f i c i e n t s f o r t h e s e
a b s e n t - b e c a u s e t h e s p e c t r a l l i n e s are narrower i n are known t o w i t h i n a f a c t o r of 2 t o 3 ( s e e , e . g . ,
such regimes and hence more s e l f - a b s o r p t i o n occurs. Ref. 2 2 ) .
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES on July 30, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-410
5
P "dx q
(Ne + M) Te
P 1 = rate of heat conduc-
tion in electron gas
collisional reactions given i n Ref. 22 are included
for this calculation, with the rate coefficients
given also i n the reference. The vibrational
relaxation time is expressed as the sum of the low-
+ rate of energy g a i n
temperature and high-temperature v a l u e s . The low-
u/
by elastic collisions
with heavy particles temperature relaxation time is taken to be the
nitrogen value given i n R e f . 25. The high-
+ rate of net e n c r g y temperature relaxation time is estimated using a
hard-sphere collision model and choosing the exci-
gain during the
inelastic (collisional tation cross section so that the high-temperature
ionization) processes relaxation time would be the same as the low.
temperature relaxation time at the temperature of
+ rate of energy gain 10,000 K. This model reproduces the existing
due to collisional vibrational relaxation rate data for nitrogen at
excitation of v i h r a . - the low temperatures, and yields a finite excita-
tional mode (4) tion cross section at high temperatures, although
the absolute magnitude of the high-temperature
The expressions for the four terns in the value may not be correct. A typical result of this
calculation is shown in Fig. 12. A s seen here,
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES on July 30, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-410
To illustrate the extent of the separation where A i j is the transition probability and nf
between the heavy-particle and electron-vibrational i s the number density of state i. For collisional
temperature and the possibility of significant transitions, the rate becomes
transport processes. a simple calculation is per-
formed i n the present study by neglecting the
transport terms in these equations. All
6
where Kij is the collisional transition rate case of atomic systems, and cannot be modeled at
coefficient and X is the number density of the
colliding particle causing the transition. The
present.
left sides of Figs. 13a and 13b schematically show Approximate Computing Method
v the types of transitions involved. In both atomic
and molecular systems, the transitions occur in Because of the need to estimate the radiative
four different directions, that is, to and from heat fluxes to the AOTV's, an approximate calcula-
the upper and lower states from the state under tion method was developed at Ames Research Center.
consideration. The destination of these transi- This model assumes that the vibrational and elec-
tions, suffixed j i n Eqs. (7) and (E), must tron temperatures are the same as the gas tempera-
include all possible States i n the system. The ture: all transport phenomena are neglected. Ten
colliding partner X can be either a heavy par- chemical reactions [(02 + X + 0 + 0 + X);
ticle o r an electron. But electrons are several (N2 + X + N + N + X); (NO + X + N + 0 + X);
orders of magnitude more effective in causing the (NO + N + 0 + N 2 ) ; (NO + 0 + 02 + N ) ;
electronic and vibrational transitions than the (N + e + N+ + e + e ) ; (0 + e + O + + e + e ) ;
heavy particles.19 For these transitions, there- (N$ + e * N + N ) ; (NO+ + e + N + 0); and
fore, heavy-particle contributions can be neglected. (08 + e + 0 + O)] are included in the calculation.
The rate coefficients for these reactions are the
When all such transitions are summed up into same as those given i n Ref. 2 2 . The mechanisms of
Eq. ( 6 ) , one obtains a system of simultaneous radiation included are 1) all atomic lines of N
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES on July 30, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-410
linear equations of an order equal to the number and 0 given i n Ref. 2 9 ; 2 ) all atomic bound-free
of available states, with the state densities ni's continuum of N and 0 given i n Ref. 30; 3) @
as the unknowns in the left-hand side and the con- first-negative band; 4 ) N2 first-positive band;
centrations of the gas species N i ' s a s the known 5 ) N2 second-positive band; 6 ) NO beta; 7) NO
quantities i n the right-hand side i n the formz3 gamma, and 8) the 02 Schumann-Rurge band. The
intensity parameters for the atomic lines are taken
from Ref. 2 9 , the continuum intensity parameters
from Ref. 30, and the molecular bands from Ref. 31.
The matrix [Bijl contains the collisional and Widths of the spectral lines are determined by the
radiative transition rate coefficients, and the method given in Ref. 32, and the calculation is
vector ci specifies the equilibrium thermo- carried out line-by-line with the method described
dynamic parameters. By solving Eq. ( 9 ) , one i n Ref. 33.
obtains the distribution of number densities of all
internal states. When the resulting n i ' s are In Fig. 7, the results of this calculation are
divided by the multiplicity gi's and plotted in a compared with the experimental data. The simple
semilogarithmic form, one obtains a plot such as code produces results that agree fairly well with
that shown in the right sides of Figs. 13a and 13b. the laboratory data, especially at high flight
velocities. At l o w velocities, the code over-
'W estimates by a factor of about 3. As mentioned
For atomic systems, the collisional and radi-
ative transition rate coefficients are known to a earlier, however, the experimental data at low
fair accuracy. For nitrogen atom, which is the velocities are likely to underestimate. Hence,
most important atomic radiator in the AOTV flight the discrepancy between the present theoretical
regime, the excitation rate coefficients have been results and the experimental data is overlooked.
tabulated,24 and the state population distributions I n essence, the code is believed to be accurate to
calculated using these excitation rates have been within a factor of about 3. The code is used in
compared with experiment. Agreement between theory Ref. 34 to compute the radiative heat fluxes for
and experiment w a s g ~ d . ~ 'The right side of Fig. AOTV's.
13a shows typical such results. Shown also in the
figure is a straight line connecting the ground
State and the ionized state. The existing data Recommendations for Future Work
indicate that when the flow is ionized Signifi-
cantly, the population density distribution Both theoretical work and experimental work
approximately follows this line. For a first are needed in order to make reliable determina-
approximation, therefore, this logarithmically tions of the radiative heat fluxes to the AOTV's.
linear distribution can be used for the AOTV cal- Experimentally, the scatter existing in the experi-
culation. mental data ( s e e Fig. 6 ) must be narrowed. The
factor of 4 scatter among the heat-flux data shown
I n the right-side of Fig. 13b, the corres- in Fig. 7 is too large to be tolerated. The fac-
ponding case of a molecular system is shown. tor of 3 deviation between the present computed
Unlike the atomic systems, very little is known of results and some of the experimental data points
the collisional transition rates in molecular shown i n Fig. 7 corresponds to an uncertainty in
systems. An effort was made in the present study radiation-equilibrium wall temperature of a factor
to approximate the distribution by the one desig- of 1.3, which is also intolerably large. The
nated "2-distribution" in the figure, in which the uncertainty concerning tha transformation of the
upper state is assumed to be in equilibrium with radiative heat-flux data obtained at the side-on
the free (atomic) state while the lower state is position ( s e e Fig. 5 ) into the end-on position
in equilibrium with the ground state." The must be removed. Preferably, a radiation measure-
resulting spectra were compared with the available ment would be made with a radiation sensor located
experimental data. The calculated spectra did not at the stagnation point, as was done far the
resemble the observed spectra. It seems, there- Apollo and Fire vehicles (see Fig. 5c). Both
fore, that the distribution of the internal states shock-tube and ballistic-range facilities could be
of the molecular systems is more complex than the used for such a test. Whether and where the
binary-scaling law of nonequilibrium radiation is
violated at the very low density owing to the 'Hornby, H. and A l l e n , W. H., ' N i s s i o n to the
collision-limiting phenomenon needs to be investi- Libration Centers,'' Astronautics &Aeronautics,
gated. Experiments are needed also to provide Vol. 4, No. 7, July 1966, pp. 78-82.
physical property values f o r theoretical modeling.
This includes: 1) vibrational relaxation rate 5Candra, E. and Arthur, P. D., "Orbit Plane v,
coefficient at temperatures above 10,000 K, Change by External Burning Aerocruise," Journal of
2) excitation rate coefficients for molecules, and Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 3 , No. 3 , Mar. 1966,
3) spectral linewidths, especially of molecules in pp. 347-352.
an ionized regime. In addition it would be desir-
able to improve the accuracy of the known chemical 'Cam, J . C., Kivel, B., Taylor, R. L., and
reaction-rate coefficients and spectral intensity Teare, 3 . D., "Absolute Intensity of Nonequflibrim
parameters. Radiation in A i r and Stagnation Heating at High
Altitudes." Research Report 93, AVCO-Everett
Theoretical investigations must be made on Research Laboratory, Everett, Mass., 1959.
several fronts also. Most urgent is the examina-
tion and analysis of the existing laboratory and 7Teare, J. D., Georgiev. S . , and Allen, R. A . ,
flight data and their incorporation into a theo- "Radiation From the Nonequilibrium Shock Front,"
retical model. Theoretical calculation of physical Research Report 112, AVCO-Everett Research Labora-
properties such as vibrational relaxation rate, tory, Everett, Mass., 1961.
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES on July 30, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-410
8
19Massey, H. S. W. and Burhop, E. H. S . , 33Amold, J. O., Cooper, D. M., Park, C., and
-_-
tronic and Ionic Impact Phenomena, Oxford h i -
versity Press, London, 1954.
Prakash, S. G., "Line-by-line Transport Calcula-
tions for Jupiter Entry Probes," Progress &
Astronautics & Aeronautics. 59, Entry Heat-
V 2aAppleton, J. P. and Bray, K. N. C., "The i n g and Thermal Protection, W. G. Olstad, ed.,
Conservation Equation for a Nonequilibrium Plasma," American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 20, No. 4, Dec.
__-- New York, N.Y. 1980, pp. 52-82.
1964, pp. 659-672.
34Menees, G . P., "Trajectory Analysis of Radia-
210kuno, A. F. and Park, C., "Stagnation-Point tive Heating for Planetary Missions with Aero-
Heat Transfer Rate in Nitrogen Plasma Flows: braking of Spacecraft," AIAA Paper 83-0407, Reno,
Theory and Experiment," Transaction of the ASME, Nev., Jan. 1983.
Series C, Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 92, NO. 3,
Aug. 1970, pp. 372-384. -AV
29Wiese, W. L., Smith, M. W., and Glennon, (8) LOW-LIFT (AERO-BRAKING) BALLISTIC
8. M., ptomic Transition Probabilities, %I.
adrogen through &, National Standard Reference PAYLOAD
Data Series-National Bureau of Standards, NSRDS-
NBS 4, National Bureau of Standards. May 1966.
9
M = 10,000 kg
M/lCdAI = 84.9 kg/rn2
(b) APOLLO
0.6 rn 0.9 rn M = 84 kg
L- ~~
MIlCdAI = 160 kg/rn2
7 IcJ FIRE W
Fig. 3 Typical d i r n r i > s i n n s o f AOTV, A p o l l o , a n d F i r e v e h i c l e s .
100 -
80-
z.
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
AIR-RELATIVE VELOCITY, V
,, krnlrec
10
TIME
..
(a) SHOCK TUBE EXPERIMENT
t-’Y)i .
p = 1 torr
/ 0
/
SENSOR
(SIDE-ON)
/
(bl BALLISTIC RANGE EXPERIMENT
z
0
-- PRESENT THEORY
z o SHOCK TUBE^-^
0 BALLISTIC RANGE’.’’
SENSOR 0 0
IC)
fEND.ONl
kmlrec
14
11
1000
I FIRE 1 AND 2 I
N NONEQ. RADIATIVE q
(PRESENT MODEL1
I
YI
2
n
10
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES on July 30, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-410
COLLISION-LIMITING
THEORY~~
60 65 70 75 80 85
ALTITUDE, km
looor i-r
I THEORETICAL
TOTAL q (REF. 13)
NDNEQ. RADIATIVE q
COLLISION-
..-.. -..
55 60 65 70 75 80
A&TlTUDE, km
Ibl APOLLO 6
12
40r-
DISTANCE, X. mm
V NONEO.
8
.iLSHOCK POSITION (INVISCID1
A (a) F l R E l , h = 7 8 . 1 km
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES on July 30, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-410
I\SHOCK POSITION
.2
(‘NVISCID’
(b) APOLLO 4, h = 73.5 km
0 5 10 15 20 25
DISTANCE FROM WALL, cm
Fig. 10 Enthalpy profiles for the Fire Fig. 12 Gas and vibrational-electron tempera-
and Apollo vehicles calculated assuming ture calculated for an altitude of 80 !a and a
equilibrium and nonequilibrium chemistry flight velocity of 9 . 6 kmlsec, neglecting
transport phenomena.
ENERGY POPULATION
LEVELS
-
(a1 ATOMIC SYSTEM
NE loo0l
20 . 30 40 . 50 60 70
TIME, t, sac Ibl MOLECULAR SYSTEM
L/
Fig. 11 Heat-transfer rate history for Apollo 4 , Fig. 13 Schematic of atomic and molecular
combining measured data with CMA calculation. systems under nonequilibrium excitation.
13